D. N.

_Pharaoh's Ring_ (Vol. viii., p. 416.).--The mention of the ring conferred

on, or confided to, Joseph by the Pharaoh of Egypt, as stated in Genesis

xli. 42., reminds me of a ring being shown to me some years ago, which was

believed by its then possessor to be the identical ring, or at all events a

signet ring of the very Pharaoh who promoted Joseph to the chief office in

his kingdom.

It was a ring of pure gold, running through a hole in a massive wedge of

gold, about the size, as far as I recollect, of a moderate-sized walnut. On

one of its faces was cut the hieroglyphic (inclosed as usual with the names

of Egyptian kings in an oval), as I was assured, of the king, the friend of

Joseph, as was generally supposed by the readers of hieroglyphics: I

pretend to no knowledge of them myself.

The possessor of the ring, who showed it to me, was Mr. Sams, one of the

Society of Friends, a bookseller at Darlington. Since railroads have {522}

whirled me past that town, I have lost my means of periodical communication

with him. He had, not long before I saw him last, returned from the Holy

Land, where he assured me he had visited every spot that could be

identified mentioned in the New Testament. He had also been some time in

Egypt, and had brought home a great quantity of Egyptian antiquities. The

lesser ones he had in the first floor of a carver and gilder's in Great

Queen Street, between the Freemason's Tavern and Lincoln's Inn Fields. He

was then anxious that these should be bought for the British Museum, and I

think that at his request I wrote to the Earl of Aberdeen to mention this,

and that the answer was that there was already so large a collection in the

Museum, that more, as they must most of them be duplicates, would be of no

use.

What has become of them I know not. I was told that a number of his larger

antiquities, stone and marble, were for some time placed on Waterloo

Bridge, that being a very quiet place, where people might view them without

interruption. I did not happen to be in London that season, and therefore

did not see them.

Notes and Queries, Number 213, November 26, 1853 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 67 / 157 题