CHAPTER VIII

_TUNBRIDGE WELLS_

But these bright and stirring days at Ramsgate were at length brought to

a close by Sir Charles Hardinge inviting me to undertake the living of

Holy Trinity, Tunbridge Wells, in the year 1853.

At first I thought very little of the offer, as I expected Sir Benjamin

Brodie to put his veto upon my removal from the sea. But when I went to

consult him upon the subject, I was not a little surprised by his saying

that, as in 1847 he had judged it necessary for me to go to the seaside,

so now he considered it very desirable that I should leave it. So that

impediment was removed, and I had to face the question whether I was

called to remain where I was or to remove.

It was a very difficult question, and I was greatly perplexed as to the

decision. But, according to Mr. Venn’s principle already referred to, my

thoughts were ultimately established, and I have never seen reason for a

single moment to regret the change. I can scarcely imagine a better

sphere for the ministry than that which I have been permitted to occupy

for nearly thirty-six years. I have had a large parish, which, after

four parochial districts have been taken from it, still contains more

than six thousand persons, the population consisting of a

well-proportioned mixture of gentry, tradesmen, and poor. I have had in

my church a stream of visitors from all parts of England, and not from

England only, but from India, Australia, and America. I have had very

many most kind, faithful, and affectionate friends ready to help me in

everything, so that, on the whole, I believe we have been able to keep

pace with the rapid growth of population; and I have had an excellent

church, which, though I do not suppose it would satisfy the

ecclesiologist, I have found to be most commodious for the worship of

God. There are three things in it quite at variance with modern fashion:

instead of an open roof to generate cold in winter, heat in summer, and

echo at all times, we have had a flat ceiling to protect us from all

changes of the climate; and instead of having the people spread far and

wide on the ground floor, there are deep galleries along three sides of

the church, containing nearly six hundred persons, all within ear-shot;

and instead of a low pulpit scarcely raising the preacher above the heads

of his hearers, there is an old-fashioned “three-decker” of sufficient

height to enable the preacher to see the whole of his congregation.

At Tunbridge Wells was much less to excite than at Ramsgate. There were

no shipwrecks, and no such activity on the part of the Church of Rome,

but there was a great increase of solid pastoral work, and I firmly

believe that our removal was of the Lord. In no period of my life have I

experienced greater mercies.

After ten years of happy work together, it pleased the Lord to take from

me my dearest wife, at which time He showed His abundant mercy in so

strengthening her faith, that she gave a glorious testimony to the power

of that Gospel which she had earnestly desired to teach, and which had

been the subject of our whole ministry. She was kept at perfect peace

through a long and suffering illness, and fell asleep in full and

unbroken trust in the blessed Saviour whom she loved. Shortly before she

died, she quoted to me the words of Mr. Standfast: “I have loved to hear

my Lord spoken of; and wheresoever I have seen the print of His shoe in

the earth, there I have coveted to set my foot too,” and He was faithful

to her to the end.

But, speaking of mercies at that period, I must not omit to mention the

help He raised up for me in my valued friend Dr. Richardson, and my

beloved sister-in-law Lady Parry. Dr. Richardson was the greatest help

to me in the management of my large family, and would come in again and

again as a friend to give me any advice he thought necessary, and tell me

whether he thought it important I should call in medical help, and again

and again has he told me that they wanted no more than their faithful

nurse could give them. As for my dear sister, she was everything that a

widower could desire, tender, wise, considerate, the best of counsellors

and the truest of friends. What she was to me at that time of my

bereavement no words can ever describe.

Then amongst my many mercies at Tunbridge Wells I must reckon the severe

illness which I had ten years afterwards, which I am thoroughly persuaded

my Heavenly Father sent me as a blessing. It called forth the same

unbounded loving-kindness from my parishioners and fellow-townsmen which

I am now experiencing while dictating this sketch of my history, and I

felt at the time that it brought us into a closer relationship with each

other than we had ever known previously. But, above all, it burnt into

my heart those words of the Apostle Paul in 2 Timothy i. 12: “I know whom

I have believed.” Those six words contained the whole of my religion as

I lay for weeks unable to think and pray, for they do not say, “I know

_how_ I have believed Him,” nor do they refer to any qualification in my

own faith, but simply to this qualification as taught in the following

words, “And am persuaded that He is able to keep that which I have

committed unto Him against that day.” It was the entire persuasion of

His perfect sufficiency that kept my soul at peace, and has made me ever

since thankful to God for having brought me into the happy experience of

that sufficiency for one who, like me, was altogether insufficient in

himself. I enjoyed also many proofs of the Lord’s providential care, one

of which was so remarkable that I think it ought to be recorded.

After my degree in 1834, I continued to reside at Cambridge and took

mathematical pupils. One summer I took a long-vacation party to

Killarney, and in the course of our residence there a young man came over

from Cork to see me. He had a great wish to go to Cambridge, and having

heard that there were Cambridge men at Killarney, he came over in order

to obtain information. The result was that he came up the next October,

and I was glad to help him in his work, in which he made good progress.

But after some time he told me that the expenses had exceeded his

estimate and that he feared he should not be able to complete his

University career. If richness be measured by the proportion of income

to expenditure, I was a richer man then than I have ever been since, as,

in addition to my father’s allowance, I received a considerable income

from my pupils. I therefore told him that he must go on to his degree,

and with the help of my dearly beloved friend Henry Goulburn gave him a

cheque which he considered would be sufficient. The result was that he

took his degree and left Cambridge. After that I altogether lost sight

of him, and wondered what had become of him.

Thus twenty-six years passed by, and I was very much interested at

Tunbridge Wells in the erection of St. James’s Church, and had issued a

circular requesting that all subscriptions might be paid in by January

1st, 1862. But though the world gave us credit for being extremely rich,

my account at the bankers was so low that I found I could ill afford the

£100 which I had promised. That 1st of January was therefore to me a day

of real anxiety, and in the early morning I committed the matter solemnly

to God, and my Heavenly Father was “thinking upon me” when, after our

family worship, my letters were brought to me, and there was one from my

young Irish friend in which he said that, though I regarded the money

given at Cambridge as a gift, he had always considered it a loan and now

wished to repay it, so enclosed a cheque of £100. It was that cheque

that I paid into the bank with a thankful heart that morning, as my

contribution to St. James’s Church. So my young friend was employed by

my Heavenly Father to take care of the money until the time when I should

require it.

In addition to the deep interest of my own parish, the proximity to

London brought me into contact with various movements of a more public

character. This involved a conflict between my duty to the parish and my

duty to the Church of which I was a member. But I firmly believe that

the parish was the gainer, not the loser, by my interest in those general

objects, and nothing tends more to wither up a man’s ministry than such

an isolation as brings him into contact with his own limited

surroundings, and leads him to stand aloof from the general work of the

Church of God.

Then it has been my desire to attend as far as possible to diocesan

interests, those connected with the rural deanery, the archdeaconry, and

the diocese, such as ruri-decanal meetings, visitations, and diocesan

conferences. It has appeared to me that when, by our position, we have a

right to attend on such occasions, we ought to do so, and that if we hold

back from taking our legitimate part, we have no right to complain if

things are said and done of which we disapprove.

On the same principle I have attended Church Congresses, and have been

thankful for the opportunity of publicly maintaining those great

principles which are inexpressibly dear to my own heart. I have never

hesitated to state what I have believed as clearly as I knew how to put

it, and my experience is that, if a person will attend them in the Name

of the Lord and as a witness for Christ, and will speak without either

reserve or compromise, he will not only receive courteous treatment from

those in authority, but will find a grand opportunity of spreading the

truth through the length and breadth of the land.

I have myself received letters, from all parts of England, thanking me

for words which I was enabled to speak at one of the Church Congresses,

and I have known more than one instance in which words so spoken have

been blessed to the permanent peace of conscientious inquirers.

I have been deeply interested in the large lay and clerical meetings of

the Evangelical body. When I was quite a beginner I listened to an

address at the Islington Clerical Meeting, by the Honourable Baptist

Noel, which has affected the character of my whole ministry. He was

speaking on the subject of spiritual power, and said that, whenever any

attempt at ornamentation became apparent, power ceased. On those words

of his I have acted ever since I heard them, and I am persuaded that

those meetings are frequently the means of making permanent impression on

many of those who are brought together by them. Thus I have always

availed myself of every opportunity of attending such meetings. In the

course of fifty-four years I have missed the Islington Clerical Meeting

only three times, and then from no choice of my own, and they have led to

a very sacred relationship with many of my beloved and honoured brethren

in all parts of the country.

But I have known none that I have regarded as a greater privilege than

our own Aggregate Clerical Meeting at Tunbridge Wells. From that I have

never been absent, except when detained by severe illness, and nothing

can exceed the sacred privilege which I have enjoyed in those happy

gatherings. We have met as brethren in the Lord Jesus, as one in the

great privileges in which we live, as fellow-labourers in our happy

ministry, and as fellow-partakers of the grace of God. We have often

taken counsel together, and though in the course of thirty-four years

almost all the original founders have passed away, there is still the

same spirit of brotherly harmony, and the same loving interest in each

other’s welfare. I often wonder how it is that some dear brethren appear

to me to undervalue such gatherings of those who fear the Lord.

But of all the objects away from home there was none that called forth my

deepest interest like the Committee of the Church Missionary Society. I

do not know exactly how long I have been a member of it, but I was

invited by Mr. Venn when I was Curate of Richmond to join the Committee

of Correspondence, and as I left Richmond forty-three years ago, I

consider that I must have been at least forty-five years a member of that

body, and I regard that membership as one of the great blessings of my

life.

It has been the practice of its management to be always on the look-out

for men who had distinguished themselves and could bring to the Committee

their own experience of the work of the Gospel in those countries where

their lot had been cast, and the result has been that there have been in

that committee room a body of men, many of whom have filled highest

positions under the Crown, but who gladly gave their time and talents to

the patient consideration of the many difficult questions that have

arisen in the progress of the work.

I can quite believe that the business of the Committee might be conducted

with more despatch, and I have myself desired to see some changes in that

direction, but for calm, patient, and prayerful consideration of the

business before them, I have never known anything to exceed the conduct

of the C.M.S. Committee. I cannot express the confidence that I feel in

the fidelity of that Committee, and when I have heard men finding fault

with their decisions, I have often wished that, before finding fault,

they would attend our deliberations and see for themselves the prayerful

process by which they have been led to their decisions. Again and again

have I known them kneel down in the midst of their business, and plead

with God for His guiding hand. And although it would be absurd to

expect, upon every difficult question, forty or fifty independent minds

should think exactly alike, yet I do not remember ever to have known an

interruption of the unity of spirit, and there are few things that I have

felt more, since it has pleased God to lay me very much aside, than the

necessity of quitting my place in that committee room, and losing the

privilege of uniting with such a body of men in such a work as that of

the Church Missionary Society. I trust God will bless them with His own

rich and abundant blessing. They have a noble work before them, not

merely in spreading the Gospel amongst the heathen, but in uplifting the

banner of truth at home, and I trust it may never happen again that dear

brethren, in their earnestness for the maintenance of a pure Gospel, will

ever think of weakening the Church Missionary Society by forsaking it,

and so rejoicing the heart of the great adversary of souls.

* * * * *

With these words the brief Autobiography is closed, and it is

characteristic of the writer that his faithful heart, like the

compass-needle ever pointing to the North, should, after a brief

deviation to his personal affairs, turn finally to the contemplation of

the glorious work of that Society whose cause he loved to plead.

It is, however, impossible to close the volume at this point. The

forty-one years of ministry at Tunbridge Wells were the most fruitful and

important of his life, yet their events are barely noticed in the last

pages that he dictated. We must therefore devote some space to the work

and character of Edward Hoare in that sphere where he became best known,

in which he bore the greatest trials of life, and whence from pulpit and

press that teaching flowed forth by which the Holy Spirit blessed

thousands of anxious souls.

Extract from the Journal, May 1858.

_Thoughts about Personal Holiness_.—Nearness to Christ. Likeness to

Christ. Singleheartedness to Christ.

_The Whole Work of the Holy Spirit_.—In Christ. With Christ. For

Christ.

_Peculiar Importance to Ministers_.—Because we are acting under a strong

religious stimulus which may be mistaken for true holiness.

Must not expect to draw souls nearer to God than we are ourselves. “Be

ye followers of me.”

Because by-ends mar and impede God’s blessing. “My glory will I not give

to another.” “Ye ask and ye receive not,” etc. God has too much regard

for the minister to trust him with success.

By-ends strike at the root of faith. “How can ye believe?” etc.

Nearness to God carries a man humbly through success, and peacefully

through discouragement.

If we live in Christ we shall be carried through the dying hour.

_The Visible and Invisible Life_.—Men see Christ’s Gospel in us. We are

the visible representatives of an Invisible Presence. Thousands read us

who never read their Bibles.

_Questions_.

Is there the same desire for salvation of souls when others preach?

Is there never pleasure in finding others less than ourselves?

Is there real gratification in the progress and success of others?

* * * * *

“Search me, O Lord” (Psalm cxxxix.). “Cleanse the thoughts of our

hearts.” Lev. xxii. 2: “Profane not,” etc.

“Pardon iniquity of our holy things.” “Be ye clean, ye that bear the

vessels of the Lord.”

Pardoned sinners the only witnesses to converting grace.

Edward Hoare, M.A.: A record of his life based upon a brief autobiography · 第 8 / 18 章