CLAVERING'S AUTO-BIOGRAPHY.

_Containing opinions, characters, &c. of his Cotemporaries._

Shelley had some excellent qualities: I attribute his eccentricities to a

spice of insanity. He often wrote unintelligibly;--sometimes in short

lyrics, beautifully. The ashes of him and Keats sleep together in the

Protestant chapel at Rome. I am resolved once more to visit _Lirici_,

where the funeral pile of his relics were lighted. I am never so happy as

when I am travelling on the Continent; the mere change of air, and

locomotion, gives me vigour. I saw old Sir William Wraxall at Dover, a few

days before he died, and meant to have accompanied him to Paris. He was

still full of anecdote, to which it was necessary to listen with caution;

but his information was often curious and valuable. He was one of our

oldest litterateurs.

Some years ago I met Sismondi: I could not agree with his ULTRA-LIBERAL

politics! He has married an English lady, but does not seem to love the

English. He himself once suffered from excessive revolutionism, and was

condemned to death by it when young, about 1794, in the reign of terror,

when _Monsieur Raville_ and others were shot at Geneva. One would have

thought that this would have made a convert of him in favour of legitimate

governments. But I forget: he does not call them legitimate! He is a thick

man, of middle height, with strong features, sallow, with weak eyes, rapid

and rather indistinct in his articulation, with a character of great

generosity and kindness; but not very tolerant to others in political

thinking.

About 1802, strange lawyers perched upon the judgment-seat. Law, Pepper,

Arden, and John Mitford! The little Pepper once took it into his head to

review a cavalry regiment of fencibles, when he was Master of the Rolls.

An unruly horse of one of the officers got head in a charge, and nearly

ran over the affrighted judge. I was on the field, saw it all; and heard

the small, staring man's terrible shriek! He swore that nothing should

ever make him go soldiering again! He could not recollect his law-cases

for a fortnight to come! He had some fun about him, and was always crying

out, _"Ne sutor ultra crepidam, ne sutor ultra crepidam."_ and indeed he

looked like a shoemaker. A bowel-complaint carried him off. Perhaps it was

the fright!

A certain learned theological bishop of that fraternity, a warm

controversialist, long since dead, was of an amorous disposition. One day,

being left alone with a pretty young lady, he began to be rude to her; she

knocked off his prelated wig, and stamped it under her foot. At that time

the footman entered, and all was confusion! The girl was in tears; the

bishop's pate was bald. The footman was left to wonder! Some squibs

appeared in the papers of the day, which few understood. I wrote a piquant

epigram, which I will not revive. Old Thurlow, who was the prelate's

friend and patron, laughed outright, and clapped me on the back when I

dined with him a few days afterwards.

I have been more than once in company with Washington Irving, a most

amiable man and great genius, but not lively in conversation. The engraved

portraits I have seen of him are not very like him. He frequented the

reading-room of Galignani at Paris, and seemed to have some literary

connexions with him. There I saw Captain Medwin, the author of the book

called _Lord Byron's Conversations_, which I believe to have been

accurately reported. He was with his friend Grattan, the author of

_High-ways and Bye-ways_. I was not personally acquainted with either of

them. Grattan's flat nose is somewhat concealed in the print given of him

in Colburn's Magazine, where this author, of course, makes a distinguished

figure.

The late Professor Pictet, of Geneva, who had spent some of his early days

in England, and was very fond of it, told me some curious anecdotes of

his countryman De Lolme, whose book on the English constitution is much

more commended than it deserves. He once endeavoured to set up a rival

Journal to Old Swinton's _Courrier de l'Europe_, but his absurd denial of

Rodney's victory ruined the project. De Vergennes, the French minister,

patronized it. Brissot was connected with Swinton in the above-named

Journal. One of Swinton's sons holds a high situation in the British

Government in India:--another commanded a ship in the Company's service.

Old Swinton was a Scotch jacobite, and forfeited.

Horace Walpole, who died Earl of Orford, was a little old man with small

features--very lively and amusing,--who talked just as he wrote: but a

little too fond of baubles and curiosities. He had a witty mind, but not a

great one:--yet he was a man of genius. His family was ancient, but his

vanity made him always endeavour to represent it of much more consequence

than it was. They had a great deal of the Norfolk squierarchy about them.

He could not bear his uncle Horace, the diplomatist, whose son, the

grandfather of the present earl, with his little tie-wig, looked like an

old-fashioned glover.

I have mentioned Mrs. Macauley, the historian. She had a dog latterly, of

which she made a great pet, and on being asked why she bestowed so much

care on it, she answered--"Why! are you aware whence it came? It is a true

republican, and has been stroked by the hand of Washington!" The event of

the French Revolution maddened her with joy; but when the news came of

Louis the Sixteenth's escape, and before she heard he had been brought

back, she took to her bed, wrote to her friends that she should die of the

disappointment--and did die. She complained that Dr. Graham had given her

a love-potion! Her young husband used her ill.

Tom Warton, the poet, was a good-natured man, but addicted to low company.

He was fond of

"Smoking his pipe upon an alehouse bench;"

He was tutor to Colonel North, the son of the minister, who thought he

neglected him. This connexion, perhaps, led him to write the _Life of Sir

Thomas Pope_, or rather that this family were founders of Warton's college.

He also wrote the life of the President Bathurst, who was elder brother of

Sir Benjamin Bathurst, a commercial man, father to the first Lord Bathurst,

the friend of Pope the poet, and who lived to the age of ninety, in

possession of his faculties,--always calling his son, the Chancellor,

"the old man!" He was one of Queen Anne's _twelve_ peers--but so rapid has

been the extinction and change, that the Bathursts are now considered old

nobility. He sprung from one of the _Grey Coat_ families in the weald of

Kent, the clothiers.

Old Dr. Farmer, the head of Emanuel College, Cambridge, Prebendary of

Canterbury, and afterwards of St. Paul's, or Westminster, used to frequent

a club in London, to which I belonged. He was at first reserved and silent:

but his forte was humour and drollery. At Cambridge he neglected forms and

ceremonies in his college too much: and was in all his glory when in

dishabille in his study, with his cat by his side, and his Shakspeare

tracts about him. He found no literature at Canterbury, and was disgusted

with his brother members of the cathedral: quaint Dean Horne, and

chattering romancing Dr. Berkeley, and his rhodomontading wife, were not

suited to him, and as little her son Monke Berkeley, of whom she gave such

an absurd and mendacious memoir, and who had none of his celebrated

grandfather Bishop Berkeley's genius. Farmer had some cleverness, but no

leading talent. He collected an immense quantity of rare and forgotten old

English books--especially poetry and the drama--at a trifling price. Todd,

the learned editor of Milton, Spencer, &c., was then a member of that

cathedral; but as his literary superiority was not pleasant to those above

him in that establishment, he was got rid of by promotion, elsewhere, out

of their patronage. He wrote the lives of the Deans of that Church, which

does not rise to more than local interest. It is a dull book.

It has been my fate to be Acquainted with Irish Secretaries. I saw much of

little Charles Abbot--afterwards Speaker--and at last Lord Colchester.

He was a pompous dwarf; yet of an analytical head. Nothing could be more

amusing than to see him strut up the House of Commons to take the chair;

nor was the amusement less to listen to him, when he delivered his edicts,

or the thanks of the House from the chair. His sonorous voice issuing from

a diminutive person, and the epigrammatic points of empty sentences,

formed with great artifice, were in very bad taste--though much admired by

a House which consisted of so few men of a classical education. His rise

was extraordinary, because his talents little exceeded mediocrity. But he

was a courtier, and an intriguant. He was the son of a schoolmaster at

Colchester.

Swift, though of English extraction, was born in Ireland. From some

memoranda of my grandfather's, I learn, that he did not speak of his

residence with Sir William Temple at Moore Park, in Surrey, without spleen.

He seemed to retain a sort of unwilling awe of Sir William; but not to

have loved him. Sir William was a ceremonious courtier: Swift's early

habits were somewhat rude and slovenly. Swift had genius, as Gulliver's

travels prove; but there is no genius in his poetry. He was both proud and

vain. His ancestor was the rector of a small living in Kent; his father an

attorney. When I was quartered at Canterbury, I saw the monument for one

of his ancestors, preserved out of the old church at St. Andrew's and

replaced in the new one. The arms sculptured on it are totally different

from what Swift erroneously supposes the family to have borne: this

ancestor was minister of that parish--not a prebendary, as Swift

represents. Miss Vanhomrigg was cousin of my grandfather, who considered

that Swift had used her very cruelly.

I often met the late Monsieur Etienne Dumont, of Geneva, the friend and

commentator of old Jeremy Bentham, at Romilly's house in London, in 1789.

He was a man of astonishing talents, sagacity, acuteness, and clearness of

head. What part he had in the brilliant effusions of Mirabeau, and in the

French Revolution, may be seen by his posthumous work, just published at

Paris, entitled _Souvenirs de Mirabeau_. He was a short, thick man, of

coarse features, blear eyed, and slovenly in his dress; but of mild

manners, hospitable, an excellent story-teller, and much beloved. I think

he had been at one time librarian to old Lord Lansdowne. He died at Milan,

in 1829, aged about 70. The French cannot contain their rage at the

exposure that he was the spirit who moved their brilliant Mirabeau.

I was once talking to Anna Maria Porter about him, when she expressed her

astonishment at the admiration I bestowed on him! She said, "I thought you

was a Whig, and an aristocrat! how can you commend a revolutionary

radical?" I answered, "You mistake his character, he is not a radical in

the sense you mean! he considers Tom Paine's Rights of Man to be

mischievous nonsense!" I could not convince her: but I made my peace with

her by praising, with the utmost sincerity, her beautiful novel, _The

Recluse of Norway_. I found her full of good sense, and with much command

of language. She will forgive me for saying she had not the personal

beauty of her gentle sister Jane. She paid many compliments to the

imaginative _vivants_ of the green island; for she perceived by my tones

that I was an Irishman, though I am not sure, that she knew even my name;

for the company was numerous, and of all countries. It was an evening

assembly, in which the rooms were so full, that one could hardly move.

Tommy Moore was there, and though he is a very little man, he was the

great lion of the evening: all the young ladies were dying to see the bard

whose verses they had chanted so often with thrilling bosoms, and tears

running down their cheeks. They were not quite satisfied when they saw a

diminutive man, not reaching five feet, with a curly natural brown scratch,

handing about an ugly old dowager or two, who fondly leaned upon his arms,

even though they discovered them to be ladies of high titles.

Rogers came in late, and went away early, looking sallower and more

indifferent than usual. He paid a few bows and compliments to two or three

noble peeresses, and then retired.

The Rev. Thomas Frognel Dibdin was there. He was very facetious and quaint:

when he found himself by my side, he instantly started off, crying to me;

"Brobdignagian; We Lilliputians must not stand by you! You would make a

soldier for the King of Prussia! Look at that tall lady there, that Miss

de V----; why do you not take her for a wife?" E---- G----n heard what he

said, and looked fierce at us both! I expected another _Bluviad!_ Perhaps

the ingenious bibliographer does not recollect the conversation; but he

may be assured it took place. And I entreat also Anna Maria Porter to tax

her memory, and recall the very interesting and sensible conversation I

had with her. I told her some anecdotes of her brother, Sir Robert, whom I

met on our travels, which pleased her. Jane would not talk much that night;

something heavy seemed to have seized her spirits. Let Jane recollect how

she once related to me the curious history and character of Percival

Stockdale! It happened at the house of a friend in London, whom I shall

not point out with too much particularity. Dibdin endeavoured to excite

the envy of some of us litterateurs, that we were not, like him, members

of the Roxburgh, which had dukes, and earls, and chancellors of the

exchequer, and judges, and the great Magician of the North into the

bargain!--_Metropolitan._

* * * * *

The Mirror of Literature, Amusement, and Instruction. Volume 19, No. 554, June 30, 1832 · 第 11 / 30 题