Moslem colleges have been founded at Rabat and Fez in order to

supplement the native education of young Mahometans of the upper

classes, who intend to take up wholesale business or banking, or prepare

for political, judicial or administrative posts under the Sultan's

government. The course lasts four years and comprises: Arabic, French,

mathematics, history, geography, religious (Mahometan) instruction, and

the law of the Koran.

The "Ecole Superieure de la langue arabe et des dialectes berberes" at

Rabat receives European and Moroccan students. The courses are: Arabic,

the Berber dialects, Arab literature, ethnography, administrative

Moroccan law, Moslem law, Berber customary law.

MEDICAL AID

The Protectorate has established 113 medical centres for the native

population, ranging from simple dispensaries and small native

infirmaries to the important hospitals of Rabat, Fez, Meknez, Marrakech,

and Casablanca.

Mobile sanitary formations supplied with light motor ambulances travel

about the country, vaccinating, making tours of sanitary inspection,

investigating infected areas, and giving general hygienic education

throughout the remoter regions.

Native patients treated in 1916 over 900,000

" " " " 1917 " 1,220,800

Night-shelters in towns. Every town is provided with a shelter for the

indigent wayfarers so numerous in Morocco. These shelters are used as

disinfection centres, from which suspicious cases are sent to

quarantine camp at the gates of the towns.

_Central Laboratory at Rabat._ This is a kind of Pasteur Institute. In

1917, 210,000 persons were vaccinated throughout the country and 356

patients treated at the Laboratory for rabies.

_Clinics for venereal diseases_ have been established at Casablanca,

Fez, Rabat, and Marrakech.

More than 15,000 cases were treated in 1917.

_Ophthalmic clinics_ in the same cities gave in 1917, 44,600

consultations.

_Radiotherapy._ Clinics have been opened at Fez and Rabat for the

treatment of skin diseases of the head, from which the native children

habitually suffer.

The French Department of Health distributes annually immense quantities

of quinine in the malarial districts.

Madame Lyautey's private charities comprise admirably administered

child-welfare centres in the principal cities, with dispensaries for the

native mothers and children.

FOOTNOTES:

[21] The loss of Morocco would inevitably have been followed by that of

the whole of French North Africa.

[22] During the first year of the war roads were built in Morocco by

German prisoners; and it was because Germany was so thoroughly aware of

the economic value of the country, and so anxious not to have her

prestige diminished, that she immediately protested, on the absurd plea

of the unwholesomeness of the climate, and threatened reprisals unless

the prisoners were withdrawn.

VII

A SKETCH OF MOROCCAN HISTORY

NOTE.--In the chapters on Moroccan history and art I have tried to set

down a slight and superficial outline of a large and confused subject.

In extenuation of this summary attempt I hasten to explain that its

chief merit is its lack of originality.

Its facts are chiefly drawn from the books mentioned in the short

bibliography at the end of the volume; in addition to which I am deeply

indebted for information given on the spot to the group of remarkable

specialists attached to the French administration, and to the cultivated

and cordial French officials, military and civilian, who, at each stage

of my rapid journey, did their best to answer my questions and open my

eyes.

I

THE BERBERS

In the briefest survey of the Moroccan past account must first of all be

taken of the factor which, from the beginning of recorded events, has

conditioned the whole history of North Africa: the existence, from the

Sahara to the Mediterranean, of a mysterious irreducible indigenous race

with which every successive foreign rule, from Carthage to France, has

had to reckon, and which has but imperfectly and partially assimilated

the language, the religion, and the culture that successive

civilizations have tried to impose upon it.

This race, the race of Berbers, has never, modern explorers tell us,

become really Islamite, any more than it ever really became Phenician,

Roman or Vandal. It has imposed its habits while it appeared to adopt

those of its invaders, and has perpetually represented, outside the

Ismalitic and Hispano-Arabic circle of the Makhzen, the vast tormenting

element of the dissident, the rebellious, the unsubdued tribes of the

Blad-es-Siba.

Who were these indigenous tribes with whom the Phenicians, when they

founded their first counting-houses on the north and west coast of

Africa, exchanged stuffs and pottery and arms for ivory,

ostrich-feathers and slaves?

Historians frankly say they do not know. All sorts of material obstacles

have hitherto hampered the study of Berber origins; but it seems clear

that from the earliest historic times they were a mixed race, and the

ethnologist who attempts to define them is faced by the same problem as

the historian of modern America who should try to find the racial

definition of an "American." For centuries, for ages, North Africa has

been what America now is: the clearing-house of the world. When at

length it occurred to the explorer that the natives of North Africa were

not all Arabs or Moors, he was bewildered by the many vistas of all they

were or might be: so many and tangled were the threads leading up to

them, so interwoven was their pre-Islamite culture with worn-out shreds

of older and richer societies.

M. Saladin, in his "Manuel d'Architecture Musulmane," after attempting

to unravel the influences which went to the making of the mosque of

Kairouan, the walls of Marrakech, the Medersas of Fez--influences that

lead him back to Chaldaean branch-huts, to the walls of Babylon and the

embroideries of Coptic Egypt--somewhat despairingly sums up the result:

"The principal elements contributed to Moslem art by the styles

preceding it may be thus enumerated: from India, floral ornament; from

Persia, the structural principles of the Acheminedes, and the Sassanian

vault. Mesopotamia contributes a system of vaulting, incised ornament,

and proportion; the Copts, ornamental detail in general; Egypt, mass and

unbroken wall-spaces; Spain, construction and Romano-Iberian ornament;

Africa, decorative detail and Romano-Berber traditions (with Byzantine

influences in Persia); Asia Minor, a mixture of Byzantine and Persian

characteristics."

As with the art of North Africa, so with its supposedly indigenous

population. The Berber dialects extend from the Lybian desert to

Senegal. Their language was probably related to Coptic, itself related

to the ancient Egyptian and the non-Semitic dialects of Abyssinia and

Nubia. Yet philologists have discovered what appears to be a far-off

link between the Berber and Semitic languages, and the Chleuhs of the

Draa and the Souss, with their tall slim Egyptian-looking bodies and

hooked noses, may have a strain of Semitic blood. M. Augustin Bernard,

in speaking of the natives of North Africa, ends, much on the same note

as M. Saladin in speaking of Moslem art: "In their blood are the

sediments of many races, Phenician, Punic, Egyptian and Arab."

They were not, like the Arabs, wholly nomadic; but the tent, the flock,

the tribe always entered into their conception of life. M. Augustin

Bernard has pointed out that, in North Africa, the sedentary and nomadic

habit do not imply a permanent difference, but rather a temporary one of

situation and opportunity. The sedentary Berbers are nomadic in certain

conditions; and from the earliest times the invading nomad Berbers

tended to become sedentary when they reached the rich plains north of

the Atlas. But when they built cities it was as their ancestors and

their neighbours pitched tents; and they destroyed or abandoned them as

lightly as their desert forbears packed their camel-bags and moved to

new pastures. Everywhere behind the bristling walls and rock-clamped

towers of old Morocco lurks the shadowy spirit of instability. Every new

Sultan builds himself a new house and lets his predecessors' palaces

fall into decay; and as with the Sultan so with his vassals and

officials. Change is the rule in this apparently unchanged civilization,

where "nought may abide but Mutability."

II

PHENICIANS, ROMANS AND VANDALS

Far to the south of the Anti-Atlas, in the yellow deserts that lead to

Timbuctoo, live the wild Touaregs, the Veiled Men of the south, who ride

to war with their faces covered by linen masks.

These Veiled Men are Berbers; but their alphabet is composed of Lybian

characters, and these are closely related to the signs engraved on

certain vases of the Nile valley that are probably six thousand years

old. Moreover, among the rock-cut images of the African desert is the

likeness of Theban Ammon crowned with the solar disk between serpents;

and the old Berber religion, with its sun and animal worship, has many

points of resemblance with Egyptian beliefs. All this implies trade

contacts far below the horizon of history, and obscure comings and

goings of restless throngs across incredible distances long before the

Phenicians planted their first trading posts on the north African coast

about 1200 B. C.

Five hundred years before Christ, Carthage sent one of her admirals on a

voyage of colonization beyond the Pillars of Hercules. Hannon set out

with sixty fifty-oared galleys carrying thirty thousand people. Some of

them settled at Mehedyia, at the mouth of the Sebou, where Phenician

remains have been found; and apparently the exploration was pushed as

far south as the coast of Guinea, for the inscription recording it

relates that Hannon beheld elephants, hairy men and "savages called

gorillas." At any rate, Carthage founded stable colonies at Melilla,

Larache, Sale and Casablanca.

Then came the Romans, who carried on the business, set up one of their

easy tolerant protectorates over "Tingitanian Mauretania,"[23] and built

one important military outpost, Volubilis in the Zerhoun, which a series

of minor defenses probably connected with Sale on the west coast, thus

guarding the Roman province against the unconquered Berbers to the

south.

Tingitanian Mauretania was one of the numerous African granaries of

Rome. She also supplied the Imperial armies with their famous African

cavalry; and among minor articles of exportation were guinea-hens,

snails, honey, euphorbia, wild beasts, horses and pearls. The Roman

dominion ceased at the line drawn between Volubilis and Sale. There was

no interest in pushing farther south, since the ivory and slave trade

with the Soudan was carried on by way of Tripoli. But the spirit of

enterprise never slept in the race, and Pliny records the journey of a

Roman general--Suetonius Paulinus--who appears to have crossed the

Atlas, probably by the pass of Tizi-n-Telremt, which is even now so

beset with difficulties that access by land to the Souss will remain an

arduous undertaking until the way by Imintanout is safe for European

travel.

The Vandals swept away the Romans in the fifth century. The Lower Empire

restored a brief period of civilization; but its authority finally

dwindled to the half-legendary rule of Count Julian, shut up within his

walls of Ceuta. Then Europe vanished from the shores of Africa; and

though Christianity lingered here and there in vague Donatist colonies,

and in the names of Roman bishoprics, its last faint hold went down in

the eighth century before the irresistible cry: "There is no God but

Allah!"

III

THE ARAB CONQUEST

The first Arab invasion of Morocco is said to have reached the Atlantic

coast; but it left no lasting traces, and the real Islamisation of

Barbary did not happen till near the end of the eighth century, when a

descendant of Ali, driven from Mesopotamia by the Caliphate, reached the

mountains above Volubilis and there founded an empire. The Berbers,

though indifferent in religious matters, had always, from a spirit of

independence, tended to heresy and schism. Under the rule of Christian

Rome they had been Donatists, as M. Bernard puts it, "out of opposition

to the Empire"; and so, out of opposition to the Caliphate, they took up

the cause of one Moslem schismatic after another. Their great popular

movements have always had a religious basis, or perhaps it would be

truer to say, a religious pretext; for they have been in reality the

partly moral, partly envious revolt of hungry and ascetic warrior tribes

against the fatness and corruption of the "cities of the plain."

Idriss I became the first national saint and ruler of Morocco. His rule

extended throughout northern Morocco, and his son, Idriss II, attacking

a Berber tribe on the banks of the Oued Fez, routed them, took

possession of their oasis and founded the city of Fez. Thither came

schismatic refugees from Kairouan and Moors from Andalusia. The Islamite

Empire of Morocco was founded, and Idriss II has become the legendary

ancestor of all its subsequent rulers.

The Idrissite rule is a welter of obscure struggles between rapidly

melting groups of adherents. Its chief features are: the founding of

Moulay Idriss and Fez, and the building of the mosques of El Andalous

and Kairouiyin at Fez for the two groups of refugees from Tunisia and

Spain. Meanwhile the Caliphate of Cordova had reached the height of its

power, while that of the Fatimites extended from the Nile to western

Morocco, and the little Idrissite empire, pulverized under the weight of

these expanding powers, became once more a dust of disintegrated tribes.

It was only in the eleventh century that the dust again conglomerated.

Two Arab tribes from the desert of the Hedjaz, suddenly driven westward

by the Fatimites, entered Morocco, not with a small military expedition,

as the Arabs had hitherto done, but with a horde of emigrants reckoned

as high as 200,000 families; and this first colonizing expedition was

doubtless succeeded by others.

To strengthen their hold in Morocco the Arab colonists embraced the

dynastic feuds of the Berbers. They inaugurated a period of general

havoc which destroyed what little prosperity had survived the break-up

of the Idrissite rule, and many Berber tribes took refuge in the

mountains; but others remained and were merged with the invaders,

reforming into new tribes of mixed Berber and Arab blood. This invasion

was almost purely destructive; it marks one of the most desolate periods

in the progress of the "wasteful Empire" of Moghreb.

IV

ALMORAVIDS AND ALMOHADS

While the Hilalian Arabs were conquering and destroying northern Morocco

another but more fruitful invasion was upon her from the south. The

Almoravids, one of the tribes of Veiled Men of the south, driven by the

usual mixture of religious zeal and lust of booty, set out to invade the

rich black kingdoms north of the Sahara. Thence they crossed the Atlas

under their great chief, Youssef-ben-Tachfin, and founded the city of

Marrakech in 1062. From Marrakech they advanced on Idrissite Fez and the

valley of the Moulouya. Fez rose against her conquerors, and Youssef

put all the male inhabitants to death. By 1084 he was master of Tangier

and the Rif, and his rule stretched as far west as Tlemcen, Oran and

finally Algiers.

His ambition drove him across the straits to Spain, where he conquered

one Moslem prince after another and wiped out the luxurious civilization

of Moorish Andalusia. In 1086, at Zallarca, Youssef gave battle to

Alphonso VI of Castile and Leon. The Almoravid army was a strange rabble

of Arabs, Berbers, blacks, wild tribes of the Sahara and Christian

mercenaries. They conquered the Spanish forces, and Youssef left to his

successors an empire extending from the Ebro to Senegal and from the

Atlantic coast of Africa to the borders of Tunisia. But the empire fell

to pieces of its own weight, leaving little record of its brief and

stormy existence. While Youssef was routing the forces of Christianity

at Zallarca in Spain, another schismatic tribe of his own people was

detaching Marrakech and the south from his rule.

The leader of the new invasion was a Mahdi, one of the numerous Saviours

of the World who have carried death and destruction throughout Islam.

His name was Ibn-Toumert, and he had travelled in Egypt, Syria and

Spain, and made the pilgrimage to Mecca. Preaching the doctrine of a

purified monotheism, he called his followers the Almohads or Unitarians,

to distinguish them from the polytheistic Almoravids, whose heresies he

denounced. He fortified the city of Tinmel in the Souss, and built there

a mosque of which the ruins still exist. When he died, in 1128, he

designated as his successor Abd-el-Moumen, the son of a potter, who had

been his disciple.

Abd-el-Moumen carried on the campaign against the Almoravids. He fought

them not only in Morocco but in Spain, taking Cadiz, Cordova, Granada as

well as Tlemcen and Fez. In 1152 his African dominion reached from

Tripoli to the Souss, and he had formed a disciplined army in which

Christian mercenaries from France and Spain fought side by side with

Berbers and Soudanese. This great captain was also a great

administrator, and under his rule Africa was surveyed from the Souss to

Barka, the country was policed, agriculture was protected, and the

caravans journeyed safely over the trade-routes.

Abd-el-Moumen died in 1163 and was followed by his son, who, though he

suffered reverses in Spain, was also a great ruler. He died in 1184, and

his son, Yacoub-el-Mansour, avenged his father's ill-success in Spain by

the great victory of Alarcos and the conquest of Madrid.

Yacoub-el-Mansour was the greatest of Moroccan Sultans. So far did his

fame extend that the illustrious Saladin sent him presents and asked the

help of his fleet. He was a builder as well as a fighter, and the

noblest period of Arab art in Morocco and Spain coincides with his

reign.

After his death, the Almohad empire followed the downward curve to which

all Oriental rule seems destined. In Spain, the Berber forces were

beaten in the great Christian victory of Las-Navas-de Tolosa; and in

Morocco itself the first stirrings of the Beni-Merins (a new tribe from

the Sahara) were preparing the way for a new dynasty.

V

THE MERINIDS

The Beni-Merins or Merinids were nomads who ranged the desert between

Biskra and the Tafilelt. It was not a religious upheaval that drove them

to the conquest of Morocco. The demoralized Almohads called them in as

mercenaries to defend their crumbling empire; and the Merinids came,

drove out the Almohads, and replaced them.

They took Fez, Meknez, Sale, Rabat and Sidjilmassa in the Tafilelt; and

their second Sultan, Abou-Youssef, built New Fez (Eldjid) on the height

above the old Idrissite city. The Merinids renewed the struggle with the

Sultan of Tlemcen, and carried the Holy War once more into Spain. The

conflict with Tlemcen was long and unsuccessful, and one of the Merinid

Sultans died assassinated under its walls. In the fourteenth century the

Sultan Abou Hassan tried to piece together the scattered bits of the

Almohad empire. Tlemcen was finally taken, and the whole of Algeria

annexed. But in the plain of Kairouan, in Tunisia, Abou Hassan was

defeated by the Arabs. Meanwhile one of his brothers had headed a revolt

in Morocco, and the princes of Tlemcen won back their ancient kingdom.

Constantine and Bougie rebelled in turn, and the kingdom of Abou Hassan

vanished like a mirage. His successors struggled vainly to control

their vassals in Morocco, and to keep their possessions beyond its

borders. Before the end of the fourteenth century Morocco from end to

end was a chaos of antagonistic tribes, owning no allegiance, abiding by

no laws. The last of the Merinids, divided, diminished, bound by

humiliating treaties with Christian Spain, kept up a semblance of

sovereignty at Fez and Marrakech, at war with one another and with their

neighbours; and Spain and Portugal seized this moment of internal

dissolution to drive them from Spain, and carry the war into Morocco

itself.

The short and stormy passage of the Beni-Merins seems hardly to leave

room for the development of the humaner qualities; yet the flowering of

Moroccan art and culture coincided with those tumultuous years, and it

was under the Merinid Sultans that Fez became the centre of Moroccan

learning and industry, a kind of Oxford with Birmingham annexed.

VI

THE SAADIANS

Meanwhile, behind all the Berber turmoil a secret work of religious

propaganda was going on. The Arab element had been crushed but not

extirpated. The crude idolatrous wealth-loving Berbers apparently

dominated; but whenever there was a new uprising or a new invasion it

was based on the religious discontent perpetually stirred up by

Mahometan agents. The longing for a Mahdi, a Saviour, the craving for

purification combined with an opportunity to murder and rob, always gave

the Moslem apostle a ready opening; and the downfall of the Merinids was

the result of a long series of religious movements to which the European

invasion gave an object and a war-cry.

The Saadians were Cherifian Arabs, newcomers from Arabia, to whom the

lax Berber paganism was abhorrent. They preached a return to the creed

of Mahomet, and proclaimed the Holy War against the hated Portuguese,

who had set up fortified posts all along the west coast of Morocco.

It is a mistake to suppose that hatred of the Christian has always

existed among the North African Moslems. The earlier dynasties, and

especially the great Almohad Sultans, were on friendly terms with the

Catholic powers of Europe, and in the thirteenth century a treaty

assured to Christians in Africa full religious liberty, excepting only

the right to preach their doctrine in public places. There was a

Catholic diocese at Fez, and afterward at Marrakech under Gregory IX,

and there is a letter of the Pope thanking the "Miromilan" (the Emir El

Moumenin) for his kindness to the Bishop and the friars living in his

dominions. Another Bishop was recommended by Innocent IV to the Sultan

of Morocco; the Pope even asked that certain strongholds should be

assigned to the Christians in Morocco as places of refuge in times of

disturbance. But the best proof of the friendly relations between

Christians and infidels is the fact that the Christian armies which

helped the Sultans of Morocco to defeat Spain and subjugate Algeria and

Tunisia were not composed of "renegadoes" or captives, as is generally

supposed, but of Christian mercenaries, French and English, led by

knights and nobles, and fighting for the Sultan of Morocco exactly as

they would have fought for the Duke of Burgundy, the Count of Flanders,

or any other Prince who offered high pay and held out the hope of rich

spoils. Any one who has read "Villehardouin" and "Joinville" will own

that there is not much to choose between the motives animating these

noble freebooters and those which caused the Crusaders to loot

Constantinople "on the way" to the Holy Sepulchre. War in those days was

regarded as a lucrative and legitimate form of business, exactly as it

was when the earlier heroes started out to take the rich robber-town of

Troy.

The Berbers have never been religious fanatics, and the Vicomte de

Foucauld, when he made his great journey of exploration in the Atlas in

1883, remarked that antagonism to the foreigner was always due to the

fear of military espionage and never to religious motives. This equally

applies to the Berbers of the sixteenth century, when the Holy War

against Catholic Spain and Portugal was preached. The real cause of the

sudden deadly hatred of the foreigner was twofold. The Spaniards were

detested because of the ferocious cruelty with which they had driven the

Moors from Spain under Ferdinand and Isabella; and the Portuguese

because of the arrogance and brutality of their military colonists in

the fortified trading stations of the west coast. And both were feared

as possible conquerors and overlords.

In Morocco(#39042) · 第 10 / 12 段