CHAPTER 5

SLAVIC EFFORTS BEFORE WORLD WAR I

In the preceding chapters, dealing with the gradual development of an

intellectual interest in Slavic questions, we have largely ignored the

activity of Slavic groups in the United States. This was deliberate, for

the early stages of Slavic study were almost completely apart from the

work of the Slavs themselves and involved only those persons who had

come to the United States and achieved prominence or success outside of

their own communities and background.

These early Slavic efforts could make little imprint upon the American

public, for the first steps were taken under most adverse conditions.

The Slavic masses were composed for the most part of the underprivileged

groups who had come to America in the hope of working for a few years

and then returning. Later they became American citizens, but until 1914

a surprising percentage of the Slavs had not taken out citizenship

papers.

For their self-protection and mutual advantage these masses had formed

their own churches and fraternal organizations. There were in the

nineteenth century many difficulties to be encountered by each and the

communities lived apart with relatively little social or political

contact with the rest of the population.

As entire families began to settle, their children were compelled to

attend the American public schools where instruction was given only in

English. It was not long before the preservation of their native

languages became a burning question, to be acted on by the establishment

of language schools held outside of regular school hours, in the late

afternoons, evenings and on Saturdays. For example, the first Czech

school was founded in 1862 by the _Slovanska Lipa_ Society of Milwaukee,

Wisconsin. In 1864, the first Czech schools were established in Chicago

and, in 1866, in New York. The example of the Czechs was followed later

by the Poles, the Slovaks, the Croatians, the Serbs and the Ukrainians.

These schools were conducted by the best educated men or women in the

community, though this did not of necessity mean much. Classes were

usually held in the building of a church or other organization, but

sometimes in private homes or in public school buildings, the use of

which was given free by the American school authorities. The textbooks

were inadequate, often being those which the teacher had studied years

before in the home country. Sometimes they were heavily laden with

political propaganda, as were the books prepared for the Carpathian

population by the Hungarian government which exercised a considerable

influence through the Greek Catholic priests who were Magyaron in

tendency as a result of their early upbringing. The situation was made

worse by the fact that the schools in the homelands were themselves

unsatisfactory, either in the hands of the alien rulers or the products

of the vague stirrings of the population to secure their own more or

less illegal schools.[28]

Despite all this, these schools did achieve some success but not enough

to be regarded as a satisfactory solution of the problem. Life in

America, even with its lack of legal barriers or restraints, was

unfavorable to active continuation of a foreign tongue. The contrast

between these impromptu courses and the developing American school

system was too striking to escape the attention of the pupils in the two

types of schools as well as the more intelligent leaders of the

community. In addition to this, these schools failed to give the

students an adequate picture of the progress that their relatives at

home were making.

The Roman Catholic schools were gradually remodelled on the normal

parochial school system. The teachers were, for the most part, nuns and

brothers from orders working among a particular national group. Their

quality of teaching was often quite low but the Church schools did enjoy

the possibility of incorporating the innovations which were coming into

the parochial schools. Thus as the parochial schools were improved, so

were the foreign schools under Church auspices.

In the Orthodox and Catholic Uniat Churches, such instruction was

usually given by the dyak or cantor, a layman who superintended the

choirs and took a part in the services. These men had some education but

little training in teaching and their efforts were largely directed

along the same lines as in their homelands.

The Protestant and anti-clerical groups endeavored to find competent

laymen. These stressed the holding of classes in some lay building or on

the property of some secular organization.

As early as 1881, a journal in Johnson County, Iowa, the _Slovan

Americky_, started a campaign to raise money for a Czech college in

America. The newspaper believed that it could accomplish its purpose if

it succeeded in raising $20,000. The proposal, being launched by a

single newspaper, did not secure the support of rival papers and the

entire enterprise was dropped as a failure.[29]

Out of this chaotic and thoroughly unsatisfactory situation two

tendencies became evident just before World War I. Those Catholic

schools which had acquired some stability and organization began to take

the shape of the other parochial schools and where there was sufficient

demand and a sufficient concentration of worshippers, they began to

approximate the parochial high schools and then to pass over to be two

or three year colleges. The work of these was still not of high calibre

but the leaders were constantly striving to make them so. Thus, the

Czech Benedictines founded a school in Chicago in 1887. This passed

through the usual changes and after its removal to Lisle, Illinois, in

1901 it was reorganized as St. Procopius College, now a duly accredited

Catholic institution. St. Vincent College, Latrobe, Pennsylvania, with a

marked emphasis on Slovak, is another of these institutions.

We find the same activity among the Poles. St. Mary’s Seminary, Orchard

Lake, Michigan, early included Polish in its curriculum, as did St.

Francis Seminary, Milwaukee. Various religious orders have long

conducted courses in the Polish language on the high school level in

various centers of population. The Polish Roman Catholic Union, with its

library, was highly developed by Mieczyslaw Haiman, especially in

publishing studies of the career of such Polish soldiers in the United

States as Tadeusz Kosciuszko and the other Poles who fought in the

American Revolution. The Polish Historical Society also has done

outstanding work. All these represent the natural development of the

Poles and their descendants in America, and deserve more than passing

mention.

At the turn of the century, the fraternal organizations also began to

give the question of schools due consideration. Almost all appointed

committees on education and they too decided that the primary need was

the foundation of special colleges where instruction could be given in

the language of the homeland. Thus, in 1902 there was formed in Cedar

Rapids, Iowa, an institution, _Matice Vyssoho Vzdelani_, a center of

higher studies, by Bohumil Simek and G. F. Severa to work for the

establishment of a Czech college, but it also met with no success.

In 1903, the Polish National Alliance also created a committee on

education and schools, which worked for ten years and then in 1912, at

Cambridge Springs, Pennsylvania, opened the Polish National Alliance

College which was incorporated in 1914. Although it was rather on the

level of a high school, it profited by the opportunity to establish a

branch of the Student Army Training Corps during World War I. Its first

rector was Professor Romuald Piatkowski. In 1915, the work of the high

school or academy was augmented by the foundation of a Technical

Institute. It was in this status that the institution passed into the

next general period.[30]

Other forces were at work, however, to preserve the native languages by

introducing the Slavic languages into the already established American

institutions. While the motives were varied the efforts were made first

by the less clerical and the more Protestant parts of the population.

Thus, in 1887, the Congregational Church in Ohio persuaded the

authorities of Oberlin College at Oberlin, Ohio[31] to introduce a

course in Czech for candidates to the Congregational ministry who would

minister to the Czech communities. Professor Louis F. Miskovsky was

appointed instructor, and his became the first chair of Slavic studies

in an American institution. Oberlin’s program differed from the later

attempts at Harvard and elsewhere in that it was frankly intended only

to teach the language. Any Slavic cultural work in a broader sense was

insignificant. It is small wonder then that on Professor Miskovsky’s

death in the 1920’s, the chair was quickly abandoned and the money used

for a course of lectures on Central European affairs given by Professor

Oskar Jaszy, a liberal Hungarian who opposed both Communism and the

regime of Admiral Horthy.

In somewhat the same way, and for the same purpose, instruction in the

Polish language was introduced into Notre Dame University in 1909.

Efforts to include a Slavic language, usually Czech, in the curricula of

state and private colleges were particularly intense in Nebraska and

Iowa.[32] In these states, the Czech population had been among the

earliest settlers; many had prospered and secured appointive and

elective posts in the state governments, which gave them the opportunity

to work for the introduction of their native language into various

institutions.

In 1903, Professor Bohumil Simek of the University of Iowa and F. J.

Pipal, a student of the University of Nebraska, established at Lincoln

the first of the Komensky Educational Clubs. These clubs were intended

to unite the Czech-Americans who had some education. The movement, which

included plans for building a monument to the Czech educator Jan Amos

Komensky (Comenius), spread extensively and finally included twenty-nine

societies, chiefly in the states of Nebraska and Iowa, although there

were some in Texas, Chicago and New York. For a while this loosely knit

organization was even able to publish a periodical bulletin.[33]

These clubs petitioned at once for the establishment of Czech language

courses at the University of Nebraska. Although the request was turned

down on the ground that there was a lack of interest in such a project

among the Czechs, a new attempt was made during the winter of 1906–07.

John Rosicky, an outstanding publisher of Czech newspapers in Nebraska,

and Vaclav Bures, both of Omaha, met the Regents of the state university

along with Frank Rejcha, a member of the Nebraska legislature. The

Chancellor of the university, in refusing the request, proposed a

political deal whereby a tax of one mill would be laid on certain

railroad properties and earmarked for the university. By clever

lobbying, the Czechs secured passage for the bill. Then the Governor of

the state cut the grants to the university and the Chancellor again

declined to set up a Slavonic department. Later the same summer,

however, another request was more successful and courses were started in

the fall of 1907.

The first instructor was Jeffrey Dolezal Hrbek, a graduate of Lafayette

College, Easton, Pennsylvania, and, at the time, a student in the

University of Iowa. He was appointed head of the new Department of

Slavonic and instructor in the Germanic languages and literatures.

Unfortunately Hrbek, a young man of great promise, became ill and died

on December 4, 1907.

He was succeeded by his sister Sarka B. Hrbkova, who graduated from the

University of Iowa in 1909 and received an M.A. from Nebraska in 1914.

Under her period of teaching, the department flourished. In 1910 she was

named adjunct professor; in 1914, an assistant professor; and in 1918,

she became a full professor. She was also very active during the war in

various aspects of Czech-American relations.

During World War I, the outburst against the use of German spread in

Nebraska to all foreign languages. The courses in the university were

dropped and the department was abolished, while Professor Hrbkova moved

to New York and became the manager of the Czechoslovak Section of the

Foreign Language Information Service, ancestor of the Common Council for

American Unity. The outburst was even worse against Czech courses in the

lower schools and in 1919 the so-called Siman Bill provided that “no

person, individually or as a teacher, shall, in any private,

denominational, parochial or public school, teach any subject to any

person in any language other than the English language.” This was made

more stringent in 1921 but in 1923, the measures were declared

unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court.

In the meantime, the break in the university courses was less prolonged.

In 1919–20, during the meeting of the State Constitutional Convention,

two members of Czech origin raised the question of a renewal of the

courses. After negotiations, the teaching of Czech was renewed in the

autumn of 1920 under Professor Orin Stepanek. Stepanek, a native of

Nebraska, received his A.B. from the University of Nebraska in 1913 and

an A.M. from Harvard in 1914. After service in the U.S. Marine Corps he

returned to Harvard and then went to serve under General Snejdarek on

the Magyar frontier. After this, he returned to Nebraska and there

became Assistant Professor of English. While there, he was also giving

courses in Czech and Russian under the auspices of the Department of

Modern Language and, later, of Romance Languages.

We have stressed the history of the establishment of Slavic work at the

University of Nebraska because the Czechs were sufficiently numerous and

influential to be able to reach the university authorities and the state

legislature. More than that, they were persistent and finally succeeded

in securing recognition. Yet in its way, the same type of politics, in

addition to formal applications, was going on with various degrees of

success in many different places.

At about the same time, Czech was included in the University of Iowa

where Miss Anna Heyberger conducted the work. Still later she changed to

Coe College at Cedar Rapids where she became Professor of French and

took a doctorate, with a dissertation on the Czech educator Jan Amos

Comenius, at the University of Paris. Alois Barta was then giving

instructions at Dubuque College and Seminary. For a while before World

War I, B. Prokosch gave courses in Czech at the University of Wisconsin

and Leon Zelenka Lerando at Ohio State University but more lasting

results were obtained by Mr. Charles Knizek at the University of Texas,

where Czech has continued almost without a break since its

introduction.[34] At this time, still other developments, largely

connected with the various churches, were ensuing. For example, Reverend

Andrew Slabey was appointed to the International Baptist Seminary in

Montclair, New Jersey, an institution greatly concerned with training

clergymen for missionary work among various non-English groups and

extensively staffed for such foreign languages as Slovak, Ukrainian and

Hungarian. On the other hand, the Russian Orthodox Archbishop of the

Aleutian Islands and North America established a small Russian seminary

at Minneapolis, Minnesota. This was later moved to Tenafly, New Jersey,

and its head was Reverend Leonid Turkevich, the present Archbishop

Leonty of the Russian Orthodox Church in North America.

We could extend this list even further, but the institutions at this

period cared for little more than the giving of elementary instruction

in a Slavic language, usually either Czech or Polish. The period

witnessed the publication of a considerable number of elementary

grammars, dictionaries and readers. Many of these were not of high

quality but they did reflect the growing maturity of the various Slavic

communities and their efforts to secure the introduction of their

languages into the curricula of American institutions. Furthermore, at

this period, it was rare that any person in one of these smaller state

institutions could secure a post exclusively in Slavic studies. The best

and most scholarly were compelled to carry almost a full load in some

other subject. But the mere fact that this was possible accents the

increasing number of young Slavs who were securing college and

university educations. The situation was still not healthy but at the

beginning of World War I it was by no means as hopeless as it had seemed

earlier.

A history of Slavic studies in the United States · 第 5 / 8 章