BANKSIDE.--OLD THEATRES.

[Illustration: BANKSIDE IN 1648.]

[Illustration: BULL AND BEAR-BAITING THEATRES.]

[Illustration: BEAR-BAITING--ROSE--GLOBE.]

The ancient topography of the southern bank of the Thames (or _Bankside_)

between London and Blackfriars bridges is peculiarly interesting to the

lover of dramatic lore, as well as to the inquirer into the sports and

pastimes of our ancestors. It appears to have been the _Arcadia_ of the

olden metropolis, if such a term be applicable to a place notorious for

the indulgence of brutal sports.

The Cut in the adjoining column represents Bankside in 1648, from which it

appears to have been then in part waste and unenclosed. "It was land

belonging to the crown, and on various parts of it stood the Globe Theatre,

the Bear Garden, and other places of public show; here were also the Pike

Gardens, some time called the Queen's Pike Gardens, with ponds for the

preservation of fresh-water fish, which were said to be kept for the

supply of the royal table, under the inspection of an officer, called the

king's purveyor of pike, who had here a house for his residence."[1] On

the Bankside, prior to the above date, were also the ancient Bordello, or

Stews, which, according to Pennant, were distinguished by their respective

signs painted against the walls, one of which, in particular, was the

Cardinal's Hat; and a small court, now or till lately called _Cardinal's

Hat Court_, still exists on the Bankside, and probably shows the precise

site of the mansion of depravity. In like manner we find on Bankside,

_Pike Garden_, _Globe Alley_, and in the vicinity a public-house with the

sign of the _Globe_. On Bankside also stood an ancient Hall and Palace of

the Bishops of Winchester, stated to have been built by William Gifford,

Bishop of Winchester, about the year 1107, on a piece of ground belonging

to the Prior of Bermondsey, to whom was paid a yearly acknowledgment. The

great court, at one time belonging to this palace, is still known by the

name of _Winchester Square_, and in the adjacent street was, some time

since, an abutment of one of the gates. Near this Palace, on the south, at

one time stood the Episcopal Palace of the Bishops of Rochester; which is

supposed to have bequeathed its name to _Rochester Street_. The whole of

the _Bank_ shown in the Cut is now densely populated, and scarcely a pole

of green sward is left to denote its ancient state. On the opposite or

Middlesex bank may be distinguished the celebrated Castle Baynard.

The second Cut represents the BULL and BEAR-BAITING THEATRES, as they

appeared in their first state, A.D. 1560. This spot was called Paris

Garden, and the two theatres are said to have been the first that were

formed near London. In these, according to Stow, were scaffolds for the

spectators to stand upon, an indulgence for which they paid in the

following manner: "Those who go to Paris Garden, the Bell Savage, or

Theatre, to behold bear-baiting, enterludes, or fence-play, must not

account of any pleasant spectacle unless they first pay one penny at the

gate, another at the entrie of the scaffold, and a third for quiet

standing." One Sunday afternoon, in the year 1582, the scaffold, being

overcharged with spectators, fell down during the performance, and a great

number of persons were killed or maimed by the accident, which the

puritans of the time failed not to attribute to a Divine judgment. These

theatres were patronized by royalty: for we read that Queen Elizabeth, on

the 26th of May, 1599, went by water with the French ambassadors to Paris

Garden, where they saw a baiting of bulls and bears. Indeed, Southwark

seems to have long been of sporting notoriety, for, in the Humorous Lovers,

printed in 1617, one of the characters says, "I'll set up my bills, that

the gamesters of London, Horsly-down, _Southwark_, and Newmarket, may come

in and bait him (the bear,) here before the ladies, &c."[2]

The third Cut includes the GLOBE, ROSE, and BEAR-BAITING THEATRES, as they

appeared about the year 1612. Of the Globe we have been furnished with the

following account by a zealous correspondent, _G.W._:

The Globe Theatre stood on a plot of ground, now occupied by four houses,

contiguous to the present Globe Alley, Maiden Lane, Southwark. This

theatre was of considerable size. It is not certain when it was built.

Hentzner, the German traveller, who gives an amusing description of London

in the time of Queen Elizabeth, alludes to it as existing in 1598, but it

was probably not built long before 1596. It was an hexagonal, wooden

building, partly open to the weather, and partly thatched with reeds, on

which, as well as other theatres, a pole was erected, to which a flag was

affixed. These flags were probably displayed only during the hours of

performance; and it should seem from one of the old comedies that they

were taken down in Lent, in which time, during the early part of King

James's reign, plays were not allowed to be represented, though at a

subsequent period this prohibition was dispensed with by paying a fee to

the Master of the Revels.

It was called the Globe from its sign, which was a figure of Hercules, or

Atlas, supporting a globe, under which was written, _Totus mundus agit

histrionem_, (All the world acts a play):--and not as many have

conjectured, that the Globe though hexagonal at the outside, was a rotunda

within, and that it might have derived its name from its circular form.

This theatre was burnt down June 29, 1613, but it was rebuilt with greater

splendour in the following year. The Cut represents the original theatre.

The account of this accident is given by Sir Henry Wotton, in a letter

dated July 2, 1613.[3] "Now to let matters of state sleepe, I will

entertain you at the present with what happened this week at the Banks

side. The King's players had a new play called All is True, representing

some principal pieces of the reign of Henry the Eighth, which set forth

with many extraordinary circumstances of pomp and majesty even to the

matting of the stage; the knights of the order with their Georges and

Garter, the guards with their embroidered coats, and the like: sufficient

in truth within awhile to make greatness very familiar, if not ridiculous.

Now King Henry making a Masque at the Cardinal Wolsey's house, and certain

cannons being shot off at his entry, some of the paper or other stuff,

wherewith one of them was stopped, did light on the thatch, where being

thought at first but idle smoak, and their eyes more attentive to the show,

it kindled inwardly, and ran round like a train, consuming within less

than an hour the whole house to the very ground. This was the fatal period

of that virtuous fabrick, wherein yet nothing did perish but _wood_ and

_straw_, and a few forsaken cloaks; only one man had his breeches set on

fire, that would perhaps have broyled him, if he had not by the benefit of

a provident wit, put it out with a bottle of ale."

From a letter of Mr. John Chamberlaine to Sir Ralph Winwood, dated July 8,

1613, in which this accident is likewise mentioned, we learn that the

theatre had only two doors.[4] "The burning of the Globe or playhouse on

the Bankside on St. Peter's day cannot escape you; which fell out by a

peal of chambers, (that I know not upon what occasion were to be used in

the play,) the tampin or stopple of one of them lighting in the thatch

that covered the house, burn'd it down to the ground in less than two

hours, with a dwelling-house adjoyning; and it was a great marvaile and a

fair grace of God that the people had so little harm, having but _two

narrow doors_ to get out."

In 1613, was entered in the Stationers' books, "A doleful ballad of the

General Conflagration of the famous Theatre called the Globe."

Taylor, the water poet, commemorates the event in the following lines:

"As gold is better that in fire's tried,

So is the Bankside Globe, that late was burn'd;

For where before it had a thatched hide,

Now to a stately theatre 'tis turn'd;

Which is an emblem that great things are won;

By those that dare through greatest dangers run."

It is also alluded to in some verses by Ben Jonson, entitled, "An

Execration upon Vulcan," from which it appears that Ben Jonson was in the

theatre when it was burnt.

This theatre was open in summer and the performances took place by

daylight; the King's company usually began to play in the month of May.

The exhibitions appear to have been calculated for the lower class of

people, and to have been more frequent than those at the Blackfriars, till

1604 or 5, when it became less fashionable and frequented. Being

contiguous to the Bear Garden, it is probable that those who resorted

there went to the theatre, when the bear-baiting sports were over, and

such persons were not likely to form a very refined audience.

We have no description of the interior of the Globe, but that it was

somewhat similar to our modern theatres, with an open space in the roof:

or perhaps it more resembled an inn-yard, where, in the beginning of Queen

Elizabeth's reign, many of our ancient dramatic pieces were performed. The

galleries in both were arranged on three sides of the building; the small

rooms under the lowest, answered to our present boxes and were called

rooms; the yard bears a sufficient resemblance to the pit, as at present

in use, and where the common people stood to see the exhibition; from

which circumstance they are called by Shakspeare "the _groundlings_," and

by Ben Jonson, "the _understanding_ gentlemen of the _ground_." The stage

was erected in the area, with its back to the gateway where the admission

money was taken. The price of admission into the best _rooms_, or boxes,

was in Shakspeare's time, a shilling, though afterwards it appears to have

risen to two shillings and half-a-crown. The galleries, or scaffolds, as

they were sometimes called, and that part of the house which in private

theatres was named the pit, seem to have been the same price, which was

sixpence, while in some meaner playhouses it was only a penny, and in

others two-pence.

We learn from Sir Henry Hebert, that 20_l_. was the greatest receipt for

one day's performance; by that we may calculate upon the house having

contained about 700 persons, at the prices before stated; that is to say,

100 for the boxes, and the rest in the other parts of the house.

Part of the site of this theatre is now occupied by the brewery of Messrs.

Barclay and Perkins; and in the _History of St. Saviour's_, already quoted,

we read that "the passage which led to the Globe Tavern, of which the

playhouse formed a part, was, till within these few years, known by the

name of Globe Alley, and upon its site now stands a large store-house for

porter."

The _Rose_ or smaller theatre, was erected in the year 1592, and is stated

to have cost £103. 2_s_. 7_d_.--a sum which would scarcely pay half the

expenses of a modern patent theatre for a single night!

These theatres appear to have been cited as nuisances by the parish

officers of St. Saviour's, in which they stood; for in July, 1597-8, a

resolution was agreed to by a vestry of the parish, "that a petition shall

be made to the bodye of the Councell, (Privy Council,) concerning the

play-houses in this parish; wherein all the enormities shall be showed

that come thereby to the parish, and that in respect thereof they may be

dismissed, and put down from playing: and that four, or two of the

Churchwardens, &c. shall present the cause with a collector of the

Boroughside, and another of the Bankside." The presentation of this

petition did not produce the desired effect; for some time afterwards the

play-houses not having been put down, the Churchwardens of St. Saviour's,

as appears from an entry in their Parish Register, endeavoured to obtain

tithes and poor-rates from the owners and managers of the theatres on the

Bankside.[5] This corresponds with the state of the English theatre, at

this period, at the height of its glory and reputation. Dramatic authors

of the first excellence, and eminent actors equally abounded; every year

produced a number of new plays; nay, so great was the passion for show or

representation, that it was the fashion for the nobility to celebrate

their weddings, birthdays, and other occasions of rejoicing, with masques

and interludes; the king, queen, and court frequently performing in those

represented in the royal palaces, and all the nobility being actors in

their old private houses. Alas!

What's gone and what's past help

Should be past grief.

The Mirror of Literature, Amusement, and Instruction. Volume 19, No. 540, March 31, 1832 · 第 2 / 16 题