On the question that the said bill be engrossed for a third reading--

Mr. DAWSON said, when the law which this bill was intended to continue

was first passed, I gave to it my dissent; I did it from a conviction on

my mind that it does violate that constitution which I have sworn to

support, and from a persuasion that the then state of things did not

require it: that while it begat an unjust suspicion of the American

character, it was a stain on our code of legislation.

If these were my impressions at that time, some reflection since, aided

by the productions of men whose names and talents will be long

remembered, and a knowledge of the sentiments of the State from which I

come, and of the people whom I represent, have confirmed those

impressions, and have resolved me to vote against that bill in every

shape and in every stage, and I hope that it will not be suffered to be

engrossed. Sir, it is well remembered by me, nor can it be forgotten by

any gentleman, on what grounds this law was advocated and first passed;

it was then supported and pressed upon us as a necessary link in a chain

of measures which a majority of the two Houses of Congress thought

proper to adopt to meet a particular crisis--to guard against the

supposed intrigues of a foreign nation--to give respectability and

energy to our Executive--to prevent its falling into disrepute with the

people, and to punish factious individuals. The history of the last two

years has, I am persuaded, convinced gentlemen how mistaken were their

opinions of the American character. With me they must now believe that

whatever difference there may be in our political principles, when the

safety, freedom, or honor of our country is threatened by a foreign

nation, like a band of brothers we will rally round our government, and

support it by means which the constitution of our country authorizes,

and which the energy of the case may require. How far this law has given

respectability or energy to our administration I will not pretend to

say; the events of the present day are an ample comment on that point;

but, after the experience which we have had, since some of the objects

for which it was formed do not exist, and others have not been answered,

I did hope that no attempt would have been made to continue it, and that

it would have been suffered to expire like its twin-brother, the Alien

law. In this hope, however, I have been disappointed; gentlemen have

come forward and supported it with a zeal, not uncommon to them on other

occasions, and unexpected in the present, when we were taught to believe

that they were at least indifferent about it, and new reasons have been

assigned for its continuance--formerly it was thought necessary to

protect the administration against the people; and now, sir, it is

wanted to guard individuals against an administration which may be weak

or wicked. Experience has, I am persuaded, convinced gentlemen that it

has not answered the first purpose, and I hope they will find it

unnecessary for the latter. Into whatever hands the administration of

our country may fall, its acts ought to be examined with that freedom

which becomes freemen, and with that decency which becomes gentlemen; so

long as they are guided by justice and wisdom, they will be supported

with decision and firmness by the friends to the administration;

whenever they shall descend from these great principles, the voice of

the people will again sweep the actors from the political theatre.

This law, sir, has been advocated, because it is said to ameliorate the

common law of England, and on this argument much dependence has been

placed; however, admitting it to be true, on a moment's reflection it

will not be found to merit any consideration; for, sir, let it be

remembered that the opponents to this law are also the opponents to the

adoption of that law as the law of the United States, and do not think

it authorized by the constitution; this is the doctrine which they have

uniformly contended for, and which, pardon me if I say, has been

established as fully as one point possibly can be; it is not therefore

probable, nay, I think it impossible, that they ever should appeal to it

to shield them. No, sir, supported by the justice and policy of their

measures, I trust they will need the aid of neither the Alien, Sedition,

nor Common law.

Sir, it will be unnecessary for me to touch on the unconstitutionality

of this law; it has been proven over and over again in this House, and

in every part of the continent, and if what has been said and written

has not convinced gentlemen, no effect would be produced by any thing

which I could say. But, sir, as some of the objects for which the law

was first enacted have passed by, and others have not been answered--as

the friends to the approaching administration do not wish it for their

protection, and the opponents will not need it for theirs, I do hope

that those gentlemen who doubt about the constitutionality will vote

with us, and that the bill will not be permitted to be engrossed.

The question was then taken, and the engrossment refused, 49 to 53, as

follows:

YEAS.--George Baer, Bailey Bartlett, James A. Bayard, John

Brown, Christopher G. Champlin, William Cooper, William

Craik, Samuel W. Dana, John Davenport, Franklin Davenport,

John Dennis, Joseph Dickson, William Edmond, Thomas Evans,

Abiel Foster, Jonathan Freeman, Henry Glenn, Chauncey

Goodrich, Elizur Goodrich, Roger Griswold, William Barry

Grove, Robert Goodloe Harper, Archibald Henderson, William

H. Hill, James H. Imlay, John Wilkes Kittera, Henry Lee,

Silas Lee, Ebenezer Mattoon, Lewis R. Morris, Harrison G.

Otis, Robert Page, Thomas Pinckney, Jonas Platt, Leven

Powell, John Read, Nathan Read, John Rutledge, William

Shepard, John C. Smith, James Sheafe, Samuel Tenney, Geo.

Thatcher, John Chew Thomas, Richard Thomas, Peleg

Wadsworth, Robert Waln, Lemuel Williams, and Henry Woods.

NAYS.--Willis Alston, Theodorus Bailey, Phanuel Bishop,

Robert Brown, Samuel J. Cabell, Gabriel Christie, Matthew

Clay, William C. C. Claiborne, John Condit, Thomas T.

Davis, John Dawson, George Dent, Joseph Eggleston, Lucas

Elmendorph, John Fowler, Albert Gallatin, Samuel Goode,

Edwin Gray, Andrew Gregg, John A. Hanna, Joseph Heister,

David Holmes, Benjamin Huger, George Jackson, Aaron

Kitchell, Michael Leib, Levi Lincoln, Matthew Lyon, James

Linn, Edward Livingston, Nathaniel Macon, Peter Muhlenberg,

Anthony New, John Nicholas, Joseph H. Nicholson, Josiah

Parker, John Randolph, John Smilie, John Smith, Samuel

Smith, Richard Dobbs Spaight, Richard Stanford, David

Stone, Thomas Sumter, John Stewart, Benjamin Taliaferro,

John Thompson, Abram Trigg, John Trigg, Lyttleton W.

Tazewell, Philip Van Cortlandt, Joseph B. Varnum, and

Robert Williams.

WEDNESDAY, February 25.

The House then resolved itself into a Committee of the Whole on the bill

providing for a Naval Peace Establishment, and for other purposes; and,

after some time spent therein, the Committee rose and reported several

amendments thereto; which were read, but, an adjournment being called

for, the House adjourned.

FRIDAY, February 27.

_Uniform System of Bankruptcy._

The House proceeded to consider the amendments reported yesterday, from

the Committee of the whole House, to the bill to amend and continue in

force the act, entitled "An act to establish a uniform system of

bankruptcy throughout the United States;" whereupon the amendments

reported from the Committee of the whole House were, on the question

severally put thereon, agreed to by the House.

The said bill was then further amended at the Clerk's table; and, on the

question that the same be engrossed and read the third time, it was

resolved in the affirmative--yeas 49, nays 42, as follows:

YEAS.--George Baer, Bailey Bartlett, James A. Bayard, John

Bird, John Brown, Christopher G. Champlin, William Cooper,

William Craik, Samuel W. Dana, John Davenport, Franklin

Davenport, John Dennis, George Dent, Joseph Dickson,

William Edmond, Thomas Evans, Abiel Foster, Jonathan

Freeman, Henry Glenn, Chauncey Goodrich, Elizur Goodrich,

Roger Griswold, Robert Goodloe Harper, Archibald Henderson,

William H. Hill, Benjamin Huger, James H. Imlay, John

Wilkes Kittera, Silas Lee, Edward Livingston, Lewis R.

Morris, Harrison G. Otis, Josiah Parker, Thomas Pinckney,

Jonas Platt, Leven Powell, John Read, Nathan Read, William

Shepard, Samuel Smith, John C. Smith, James Sheafe, Samuel

Tenney, George Thatcher, John Chew Thomas, Peleg Wadsworth,

Robert Waln, Lemuel Williams, and Henry Woods.

NAYS.--Willis Alston, Theodorus Bailey, Phanuel Bishop,

Robert Brown, Samuel J. Cabell, Matthew Clay, William

Charles Cole Claiborne, John Condit, John Dawson, Joseph

Eggleston, John Fowler, Albert Gallatin, Edwin Gray, Andrew

Gregg, John A. Hanna, Joseph Heister, David Holmes, George

Jackson, Aaron Kitchell, Michael Leib, Levi Lincoln,

Matthew Lyon, James Linn, Nathaniel Macon, Peter

Muhlenberg, Anthony New, John Nicholas, Joseph H.

Nicholson, John Randolph, John Smilie, John Smith, Richard

Dobbs Spaight, Richard Stanford, David Stone, Thomas

Sumter, John Stewart, Benjamin Taliaferro, John Thompson,

Abram Trigg, John Trigg, Lyttleton W. Tazewell, and Joseph

B. Varnum.

_Ordered_, That the said bill, with the amendments, be engrossed and

read the third time to-morrow.

_Naval Peace Establishment._

An engrossed bill providing for a Naval Peace Establishment, and for

other purposes, was read the third time; and, on the question that the

same do pass, it was resolved in the affirmative--yeas 69, nays 18.

SATURDAY, February 28.

An engrossed bill to augment the salaries of the District Judges in the

districts of Massachusetts, New York, Delaware, and Maryland,

respectively, was read the third time, and passed.

Mr. GREGG, from the committee to whom was this day referred the memorial

of Thomas Claxton and others, made a report; which he delivered in at

the Clerk's table, where the same was twice read and considered;

whereupon,

_Resolved_, That Thomas Claxton, James Mathers, and Thomas Dunn, be

permitted to occupy, free of rent, until otherwise directed by Congress,

the houses now in their respective possession, the property of the

United States, in the public square in the City of Washington, on which

the Capitol stands; together with a small piece of ground contiguous to

each, for a garden, to be enclosed in such manner as not to interfere

with any of the public streets or avenues running through the said

square.

_Ordered_, That the Clerk of this House do carry the said resolution to

the Senate, and desire their concurrence.

Mr. GRISWOLD, from the committee appointed, presented a bill further to

amend the act, entitled "An act for establishing the temporary and

permanent seat of the Government of the United States;" which was read

twice, and committed to a Committee of the whole House on Monday next.

The House resolved itself into a Committee of the Whole on the bill

concerning the Mint; and, after some time spent therein, the committee

rose and reported one amendment thereto; which was twice read, and

agreed to by the House.

_Ordered_, That the said bill, with the amendment, be engrossed, and

read the third time to-day.

_Remonstrance of Georgia._

Mr. DANA, from the committee to whom was referred, on the seventh

ultimo, the memorial and remonstrance of the Legislature of the State of

Georgia, made a report; which was read, and ordered to be committed to a

Committee of the whole House on Monday next.

The report is as follows:

The Committee to whom was referred the Address and

Remonstrance of the Legislature of the State of Georgia,

submit the following Report:

The remonstrance complains of two acts of Congress

respecting the Mississippi Territory; one passed in April,

one thousand seven hundred and ninety-eight, the other in

May, one thousand eight hundred; and prays for their

repeal.

The tract of country called the Mississippi Territory, is

bounded on the west by the River Mississippi, on the east

by the river Appalachicola, or Chatahoochee, on the south

by the Southern boundary of the United States, and on the

north by a line drawn from the confluence of the river

Yazoo with the Mississippi, due east to the before

mentioned river Chatahoochee.

For a view of the claim of the United States to the

territory in question, the committee, in the present

instance, deem it sufficient to refer to a report of the

Attorney General, made to the Senate, at the first session

of the fourth Congress, and to the report of a committee of

the House of Representatives, made at the first session of

the sixth Congress. The last-mentioned report also contains

a summary statement of a variety of individual claims to

land within the territory.

The claim of Georgia is particularly stated in the

remonstrance referred to your committee.

The two acts of Congress, of which the remonstrance

complains, have provided for an adjustment of those claims,

through the agency of Commissioners; and also for the

establishment of a government over the Mississippi

Territory, similar to that established by the ordinance of

Congress, of July one thousand seven hundred and

eighty-seven, for the Territory north-west of the river

Ohio; saving and reserving to the State of Georgia all her

right or claim to the said territory.

Commissioners have accordingly been appointed on the part

of the United States, and also on the part of Georgia, for

negotiating an adjustment of their respective claims. No

report has yet been laid before Congress from the

Commissioners of the United States; but the business of

their commission is understood to be yet pending.

Considering this state of things, the committee deem it

proper for them to abstain from any particular discussion

of the several claims to the Mississippi Territory, while a

hope is cherished that an amicable adjustment may be

ultimately effected. Nor do they think it expedient to

adopt any measure which may be prejudicial to an object so

desirable.

The committee therefore submit the following resolution:

"_Resolved_, That it would not be proper at this time for

the House to take any further order on the Address and

Remonstrance of the Legislature of the State of Georgia."

MONDAY, March 2.

The SPEAKER laid before the House a letter from the President of the

United States elect, which was read, and is as follows:

WASHINGTON, _March 2, 1801_.

SIR: I beg leave through you to inform the Honorable the

House of Representatives of the United States, that I shall

take the oath which the constitution prescribes to the

President of the United States before he enters on the

execution of his office, on Wednesday, the fourth instant,

at twelve o'clock, in the Senate Chamber.

I have the honor to be, with the greatest respect, sir,

your most obedient, and most humble servant,

Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 2 (of 16) · 第 218 / 272 题