If Solomon had been right, fatherhood would be easy; but the simple fact

that even you or I, gentle Reader, being often reproved, will harden

our necks, reveals the widespread tendency to ossification that has

gradually discredited the didactic and strong-arm system. If I may

compose a proverb myself--

The wise man maketh no enemy of his neighbor;

And the wise father maketh a friend of his son.

But it is easier to compose a proverb than to apply it, and friendship,

which can be built only on a good foundation of common understanding and

truthful speech, is here especially difficult. "To speak truth," says

Stevenson, "there must be a moral equality or else no respect; and hence

between parent and child intercourse is apt to degenerate into a verbal

fencing bout, and misapprehensions to become ingrained. And there is

another side to this; for the parent begins with an imperfect notion of

the child's character, formed in early years or during the equinoctial

gales of youth; to this he adheres, noting only the facts that suit with

his preconceptions; and wherever a person fancies himself unjustly

judged, he at once and finally gives up the effort to speak truth."

Somehow or other our Mr. Todd, if he wishes to make the best of his

paternity, must overcome the handicap imposed by his wider mental

experience and his acquired moral distinctions between rightness and

wrongness; somehow or other he must create in Harvey, Jr., an

affectionate regard for his jolly old father that shall make it a line

of least resistance for the little fellow to follow and imitate his

jolly old father's opinions and wishes. Often, indeed, if he is wise,

Mr. Todd will dare to seem foolish. "Foolishness," said Solomon, "is

bound up in the heart of the child"--and there he stopped, after adding

his usual suggestion about the rod as a remedy. But it is bound up also,

O Solomon, in every heart that beats, and is one thing at least that Mr.

Todd and little Harvey have in common to start with.

And so the father plays his unapplauded part--"tragedy, comedy, history,

pastoral, pastoral-comical, historical-pastoral, tragical-historical,

tragical-comical-historical-pastoral, scene individable, or poem

unlimited," as Polonius might enumerate. He wants no applause. He wants

no "Father's Day." He wants no statue. He wants no advice. Yet it seems

to me that a figure and character has lately been perpetuated in

statuary of various kinds that answers all practical purposes, though

most of us think of the original as a Great American rather than as a

Great Father.

V

ON BEING A LANDLORD

_In an informal, but practical way, a landlord is, and must be, a

Justice of the Domestic Peace. If one tenant murders another

tenant, the case passes beyond his jurisdiction: he has no power of

the black cap. But if one tenant annoys another (which may

eventually lead to homicide more or less justifiable), the case

comes to his court: he is both jury and judge, and can in extremity

pronounce sentence of eviction. But so many and subtile are the

ways in which tenants annoy each other that to be a perfectly just

landlord would demand a wisdom greater than Solomon's._--APARTMENTS

TO LET.

On my consciousness are impressed the names of fourteen married women

and one (so far as I know) unmarried man: Mrs. Murphy, Mrs. Smith, Mrs.

Brown, Mrs. Cawkins, Mrs. Trolley, Mrs. Karsen, Mrs. Le Maire, Mrs.

Barber, Mrs. Sibley, Mrs. Carrot, Mrs. Mahoney, Mrs. Hopp, Mrs. Ranee,

Mrs. Button, and Charlie Wah Loo. Their husbands I hardly know at all;

indeed, if Mrs. Carrot should introduce Mr. Hopp to me by that dear

title,--as, for example, 'my husband, Mr. Hopp,'--I should hastily

readjust my ideas and decide that Mrs. Carrot was really Mrs. Hopp, and

Mrs. Hopp really Mrs. Carrot. Charlie Wah Loo _may_ be married; he

devotes his days to the washtub and ironing-board, and his nights (I

like to think) to what Mr. Sax Rohmer, author of "The Yellow Claw,"

mysteriously mentions as "ancient, unnamable evils." In feudal times,

however, I should have known them all better. Tramp! Tramp! Tramp! that

brave little company--

BUTTON

HOPP

CARROT

BARBER

KARSEN

CAWKINS

SMITH

RANEE

MAHONEY

SIBLEY

LE MAIRE

TROLLEY

BROWN

MURPHY

--would have marched sturdily under my banner, each in his stout

leathern jerkin, manfully carrying his trusty pike, halberd, long bow,

short bow, or arbalest; and with them Charlie Wah Loo would have trotted

along by himself as an interesting human curiosity--or, perhaps, in a

cage. Each in his time would have done me fealty, saying, "Know ye this,

my lord, that I will be faithful and true unto you, and faith to you

will bear for the tenements which I claim to hold of you; and that I

will lawfully do to you the customs and services which I ought to do at

the terms assigned. So help me God and his saints."

Those, in retrospect, were pleasant days for the landlord, when rent was

paid in loyal service and a few dozen eggs, or what not. But all that

now remains of the ancient custom is that they continue, vicariously,

through the agency of their beloved helpmates, to pay me rent. In this

sense, Charlie Wah Loo, with his washtub and irons, is his own beloved

helpmate.

Briefly, I am a landlord. But do not hate me, gentle reader, for I am of

that mild, reticent, and reluctant kind to whom even collecting the

rent, to say nothing of raising it, is more a pain than a pleasure.

There are such landlords, products of evolution, inheritance, and a

civilization necessarily based on barter. Our anxious desire is to exact

no more than a "fair rent"; at our weakest, when a tenant gets in

arrears and, evidently enough, cannot catch up, our line of least

resistance would be to go quietly away and leave that tenement to the

tenant, his heirs and assigns forever. It is unpleasant, and becomes

more so every time, to remind him that he owes us money. Only the

inexorable harshness of our own overlords compels us, hating ourselves

the while, to be strict.

I have seen it stated as a scientific deduction that "in the beginning

man probably dwelt in trees after the fashion of his ape-like ancestors.

He lived on nuts, fruits, roots, wild honey, and perhaps even bird's

eggs, grubs from rotten wood, and insects." And my own experience leads

me to feel that there was much to be said for this way of life, though I

draw the line at birds' eggs, grubs from rotten wood, and insects, at

which items of an earlier menu even the scientific mind seems to baulk.

But it may well have happened that some strong fellow presently got

possession of an especially desirable tree, and allowed others to share

its branches only if they kept him supplied with provisions. Thus may

landlordry have been established.

Millions of years have passed since then,--a mere flicker in the great

movie of eternity,--and we are still, many of us, living in trees; but

the trees have been cut down and made into houses, of which at present

there are not enough to go round. We have outgrown our simple arboreal

diet, developed and perfected the hen (no small achievement in itself),

invented underwear, and in countless other cunning ways have created a

complex civilization. Century by century, generation by generation, we

have acquired tastes and conventions that prevent us from returning to

the simple, happy, uncomplicated life of our ape-like ancestors. And in

this civilization that we have made, the figure of the landlord bulks

large and overshadowing, and might, indeed, be likened to Rodin's

Thinker, thinking, in this instance, about how much more he shall raise

the rent. One must assume, of course, that he is thinking about it just

before taking his morning bath.

It is not my purpose to dwell upon those disgraceful landlords who

profiteer. I am concerned rather with the character of the Perfect

Landlord, a just man, respected, if not loved (within reason), by

fourteen married women and a Charlie Wah Loo. But this admirable ideal

seems impracticable. I know a landlord who speaks with pleasure of the

social aspect of collecting his rents; but his is a selected tenantry,

for he lets apartments only to what he calls "nice people," whose

society he feels reasonably certain he will enjoy on rent-day, and whose

financial status, he also feels reasonably certain, is and will remain

such that no painful embarrassment on this sordid but necessary side of

their relations will ever cast a gloom over his visit. Yet even so, I

gather that there are sometimes breaks in the golden chain, when the

nice tenant chats with a too feverish interest about life and things in

general, and the sordid aspect cannot be glossed over by a casual "Ah,

yes, the rent." Such breaks in the golden chain are the test of

landlordry.

I am reminded of a little one-act play which I have just written

entitled

THE RENT

CHARACTERS: MRS. BUTTON, a tenant.

I, a landlord.

SCENE: _A tenement, owned by_ I, _but referred to as_ MRS.

BUTTON'S, _which is perhaps more correct._ MRS. BUTTON _is washing

dishes. The room steams. Slow creaks outside as of a reluctant man

coming upstairs._ MRS. BUTTON _smiles enigmatically. A knocking at

the door, as in "Macbeth."_

MRS. BUTTON. Come in. (I _enters._)

I _(laughing with affected lightness)._ Ah, _good-_morning, Mrs.

Button. I've come for the rent.

MRS. BUTTON _(weeping)._ It's not me, as ye know, sir, that likes

to be behind with th' rint. I'm proud.

I _(touched in spite of himself by the sight of a strong woman in

tears)._ I know _that._ But you've been here seven months, Mrs.

Button, without--

MRS. BUTTON _(wiping her eyes)._ Yis, I'm an old tenant, and 't

would break me heart to go. An' me goin' to begin payin' reg'lar

only nixt week, sir. It's th' only home I've got, an' it's cruel

harrd to leave it.

I (_sternly_). Very well. Very well. I shall _expect_ the money

next week. Good-day, Mrs. Button.

MRS. BUTTON. Good-day, sir.

I _exits_. MRS. BUTTON _resumes washing dishes, smiling

enigmatically. The room steams, and steps are heard going hastily

downstairs, fainter and fainter_.

(CURTAIN)

It is a grave responsibility--this power to dispossess other human

beings of their little home--to say nothing of the recurrent task of

making them behave themselves in it. Perhaps, on some other and happier

plane of being, all landlords will be just and all tenants reasonable of

disposition and stable of income. Then, indeed, the landlord need have

nothing in common with a well-known walrus, of whom it is told that, in

dealing with certain oysters, "with sobs and tears he sorted out those

of the largest size." But something might even now be done by compulsory

psychopathic--I had nearly said psychopathetic--treatment; for thus the

effort to solve the rent problem would go to the soil in which it is

rooted, and no complicated laws would be needed. Landlords and tenants,

in fact everybody, would have to take the treatment,--including, of

course, the psychopathic practitioners, who would treat each other,--but

it would be a fine thing for the world if it worked.

One sees in imagination the profiteering landlord, after looking long

and intently at a bright object, say a five-dollar gold-piece, dropping

peacefully asleep; one hears the voice of the scientist repeating,

firmly and monotonously, "When you wake up you will never want anything

more than a just rent--a just rent--a just rent--a just rent."

One sees this profiteering landlord, once more wide awake, busy at his

desk with pencil and paper, scowling conscientiously as he endeavors to

figure out exactly what a just rent will be. Investment, so much; taxes;

insurance; repairs; laths and plaster here, wall-paper there; water,

light, putty, paint, janitor, Policeman's Annual Ball, postman at

Christmas, wear and tear on landlord's shoes, etc., etc., etc.,

etc.--now, if ever, there is a tired business man.

Or,--to take another aspect of this great reform,--there is the sad case

of Mrs. Murphy, who can no longer endure the children of Mrs. Trolley,

who lives in the flat above her. They run and play, run and play; they

produce in Mrs. Murphy a conviction that presently the floor will give

way, and the children, still running and playing, will come right

through on her poor head. Yet it is the nature of children to run and

play, run and play: the landlord cannot, try as he may, persuade Mrs.

Trolley to chain her offspring. So away, away to the Public Psychopathic

Ward with poor Mrs. Murphy. "Madam, when you awake, the sound of running

feet over your poor head will suggest the joys of innocent childhood,

and you will be very happy when they run and play, run and play--happy

all day--run and play--run and play--happy all day--run and play."

But alas, so far even psychopathic treatment cannot promise to stabilize

incomes. There must still be times when the just landlord must say to

his tenant, "All is over between us; we must part forever--and at once."

To which, judging by the tenor of some of the laws that have lately

been suggested, the tenant may presently answer, "All right, you Old

Devil. This is the tenth of the month, and I'll shake the dust of your

disgraceful premises off my feet two years and six months from

to-morrow."

It's a puzzling time for us landlords. Not long ago I felt compelled to

raise the rent of fourteen married women and one (so far as I know)

unmarried Chinaman. And then, overcome by conscience, I sat down and

figured out a just rent. And when I had finished I came upon a

distressing discovery. I had raised the rent of neither Mrs. Murphy,

Mrs. Smith, Mrs. Brown, Mrs. Cawkins, Mrs. Trolley, Mrs. Karsen, Mrs. Le

Maire, Mrs. Barber, Mrs. Sibley, Mrs. Carrot, Mrs. Mahoney, Mrs. Hopp,

Mrs. Ranee, Mrs. Button, nor Charlie Wah Loo, anything like enough.

VI

OLD FLIES AND OLD MEN

_To-day, my dear, I greatly astonished my grandson by standing on my

head, and by entering the kitchen by turning a back-somersault through

the door--exercises which I frequently practise for the benefit of my

digestion, but not often in public. His bewilderment at seeing a man of

my years perform such acrobatics was most comical. But there, there, one

must amuse one's self with the young sometimes. I have thought more or

less seriously of advising these exercises for general use; but few men

have had the advantage of being brought up in a circus, and what seems

easy to me would no doubt present insuperable obstacles to most. The

main thing, after all, is not to grow old before your time, because the

silly younger generation likes to flatter itself by thinking you

antediluvian._--LETTERS OF FATHER WILLIAM.

Few men read Shakespeare, and so, fortunately enough, few think of

themselves as being some day a pantaloon--lean and slippered (as

Shakespeare described this sixth age of man), with spectacles on nose,

his youthful hose, well-saved, a world too wide for his shrunk shank,

and his big, manly voice, turning again to childish treble, operating

like a penny whistle when he tries to converse. But the Bard made a

bogey: at any rate, there are fewer pantaloons visible than there

probably were in Elizabethan England; and the sixth age of man appears

more logically to offer a kind of Indian summer that is well worth

living for. Shakespeare, it seems to me, slipped a cog in his sequence;

and I prefer to think of Cornaro, the Italian centenarian, who began at

forty to restrict his diet (though this I care less for), and wrote of

himself at eighty-three: "I enjoy a happy state of body and mind. I can

mount my horse without assistance; I climb steep hills; and I have

lately written a play abounding in innocent wit and humor. And I am a

stranger to those peevish and morose humors which fall so often to the

lot of old age."

Granting some other choice of mental employment,--for writing that kind

of a play seems nowadays too useless an occupation even for an old man's

leisure,--this is the kind of an old man I should like to be.

In the light of recent scientific research with flies, Cornaro probably

inherited his longevity from long-lived ancestors, and would have done

about as well on a less restricted diet: he might reasonably have

lasted as long if not as comfortably. Ideas have changed since Pope

asked himself,--

Why has not man a microscopic eye?--

and promptly answered,--

For this plain reason, Man is not a Fly.

Say what the use, were finer optics giv'n,

T' inspect a mite, not comprehend the heav'n?

Man since then has provided himself with a remarkably good microscopic

eye. He has inspected the mite, and discovered resemblances between this

innocently disgusting little insect and himself, which make it

desirable, in some cases, to suspend the swatter, and study instead of

assassinate. Granting that the proper study of mankind is Man, the

proper study of mankind is Flies; for the days of a fly present an

entertaining and instructive parallel to the years of a man: a

seventy-year-old man and a seventy-day-old fly are contemporaries;

other things being equal, they might almost be called twins. Confined in

glass bottles and observed impartially from birth to burial, each baby

fly, it appears, inherits a maximum number of days on this perplexing

planet, and lives fewer according to the activity with which he expends

his inheritance. If flies had copybooks one might compose a maxim for

little flies to copy,--

Do not fly too much or fast,

And you will much longer last.

Thus one scientific gentleman has watched, godlike, the lives of 5836

flies--3216 fair flies (if I may so call them), and 2620 of their

natural, and only, admirers--from their separate birth-minutes till each

in turn paid his or her little debt to nature, and passed away. It is an

odd thing to contemplate--this self-election of a man to the positions

of guardian, health officer, divine providence, nursemaid, matchmaker,

clergyman, physician, undertaker, and sexton to 5836 flies. Yet it

redounds to his credit, and is another proof of the poet's contention

that we men are superior: for what fly would ever think of studying us

to find out anything about himself? And, by deduction, I, like the

little fly, inherit my span of life, although either accident or a germ

may get me if I don't watch out.

But even if man, like the fly, inherits his individual length of life,

he will, again like the fly, go on living it with little concern as to

whatever invisible string may be fastened to his inheritance. He will

think hopefully that any ancestor he has had who died by violence or a

germ might otherwise have lived to be as hale and hearty as Father

William, that lively sage whose habit was to stand on his head at

intervals, and to enter a door by turning a back-somersault. Heredity

is still a mystery; the ancestry of free men is much more complicated

than that of flies in bottles; and any of us, if he anxiously carried

his genealogical research far enough back, would find a goodly number of

forbears, prematurely carried off, from whom he might reasonably have

inherited quite a lot of what the scientific mind calls the

"hypothetical substance or substances which normally prevent old age and

natural death." Flies growing gracefully old in glass bottles therefore

need not worry us, and every ancestor who has been hanged is a reason

for optimism.

And there is another reason even more valuable than a pendent ancestor.

You and I, gentle Reader, have souls (though there may be times of

discouragement when we wish we hadn't), and old age is a mere trivial

incident in our jolly eternal lives. Willy-nilly, we begin growing

older, by the conventional measurement of time, with our first breath;

but who can prove that we are not in reality very much older than we

look in the beginning, and very much younger than we look in the end? I

get these sober thoughts from the laboratory rather than the pulpit,

from evolution rather than dogma. O aged fly, to whom your seventy days

are a long life and your glass bottle a perfectly natural and normal

world in which to have lived it! O aged man, to whom your seventy years

are a long life, and who may also have lived it, for all you know, in a

kind of glass bottle, big enough to contain comfortably this little

planet and all the visible stars! Whoever respects age for its own sake

must impartially salute you both.

"It is a man's own fault," said Dr. Johnson, then seventy years old,

but no pantaloon, "it is from want of use, if the mind grows torpid in

old age." And so plausible is this observation, that any reasonably

intelligent man might make it to his wife at breakfast without at all

astonishing her. Here, to be sure, one gets no help from flies in glass

bottles who depart this world according as they fly more or fly less,

for theirs apparently is a democracy in which no outside observer can

yet say that any one fly thinks more or thinks less than another. A

scientific study of 5836 old men (in biographies instead of bottles)

would very likely do no more than verify the generalization that any

thinker may make at breakfast. And this being the case, civilization

tends naturally enough to reduce the number of pantaloons. Universal

education, books, newspapers, magazines, politics, movies, anything and

everything that to any degree employs and exercises the mind, postpones

its torpidity; and statistics indicate that an increasing proportion of

babies live to be middle-aged people--but a decreasing proportion of

middle-aged people live to be old enough to become pantaloons. For many

a not-so-very-promising baby survives nowadays who would have perished

under earlier conditions; and many a man gets to middle life who would

otherwise be dead already, and lacks the "pep," as a popular magazine

editor might say, to get very much further. What a survival of the

fittest, for example, was that of the beautiful Galeria Copiola, who, I

have read, made her first dazzling appearance in the theatre of ancient

Rome at the age of ninety! She acted and danced; and Roman playgoers of

seventy, sitting in the front rows, had opportunity to become madly

infatuated with a charmer twenty years their senior, such as now falls

only to the lot of the college undergraduate or the tired business man.

And if anybody doubts this surprising youthfulness of Galeria, I offer

the corroborative evidence of the seventeenth-century pamphlet, "The

Olde, Olde, very Olde Man; or the Age and Long Life of Thomas Parr," in

which John Taylor, the Water Poet, describes the pre-Adamite who was

brought up to London at the age of 152, met the King, and had such a

great good time in general, that his death nine months later was

attributed to over-excitement.

He was of old Pythagoras' opinion

That green cheese was most wholesome with an onion;

Coarse meslin bread, and for his daily swig,

Milk, butter-milk, and water, whey and whig:

Sometimes metheglin, and by fortune happy,

He sometimes sipped a cup of ale most nappy.

(I have looked up "metheglin," and I find it to have been a "strong

liquor made by mixing honey with water and flavoring it, yeast or some

similar ferment being added, and the whole allowed to ferment." "Ale"

was also a liquor, but made from malt. "Nappy" means heady and strong:

"Nappie ale," says an old writer, was "so called because, if you taste

it thoroughly, it will either catch you by the nape of the neck or cause

you to take a nappe of sleepe." The use of these drinks, it may still be

argued, shortened Parr's life; but the fly-research that I have

mentioned seems to indicate that their tendency to decrease physical

activity by inducing "nappes" may have materially helped him to conserve

his inheritance of longevity.)

The Seven Ages of Man · 第 2 / 3 段