Any man who knows that, sooner or later, he must go to another afternoon

tea cannot but rejoice at the recent invention of an oval, platter-like

saucer, large enough to hold with ease a cup, a lettuce or other

sandwich, and a dainty trifle of pastry. The thing was needed: the

modesty of the anonymous inventor--evidently _not_ Mr. Edison--reveals

him one of the large body of occasional and unwilling tea-goers. We, the

reluctant and unwilling, are all strangely alike at these functions; and

we have all been embarrassed by the old-fashioned saucer. Circular in

shape, and hardly larger than the cup that belies its reputation and

dances drunkenly whenever another guest joggles our elbow,--which

happens so often that we suspect conspiracy,--the old-fashioned saucer

affords no reasonably secure perch for a sandwich; responds with delight

to the law of gravitation if left to itself; and sets us wishing, those

of us who think scientifically, that evolution had refrained from doing

away with an extension by which alone we could now hope to manage it.

_We mean a tail!_ If afternoon teas had been started in the Oligocene

Epoch instead of the seventeenth century, we are convinced that

evolution, far from discarding this useful appendage, would have

perfected it. A little hand would have evolved at the end of it--such a

one as might hold a Perfect Gentleman's saucer while he sipped from his

tea-cup.

Nay, more. In many ways that will at once occur to the intelligent

reader this little hand would be helpful in our complex modern

civilization. It would hold this essay. It would turn the music at the

piano. It would enable two well-disposed persons cordially to shake

hands when their four other hands were busy with bundles. It would slap

the coward mosquito that stabs in the back. It would be absolutely

perfect for waving farewell. Nor would there be anything 'funny' about

it, or shocking to the most refined sensibilities: the vulgar would

laugh and the refined would hide a shudder at the sight of a man with no

tail! We would, of course, all look like the Devil, but everybody knows

that _his_ tail has never yet kept him out of polite society.

This digression, however, leads us away from our subject into alien

regrets. We put it behind us.

The truth is, we do not like your afternoon teas--except those little

ones, like the nice children of an objectionable mother, that are

informal, intimate, and not destructive of our identity. At larger

gatherings we have no identity: we are supernumeraries, mere tea-cup

bearers, wooden Indians who have been through Hampton, hand-carved

gentlemen, automaton tea-goers. In short, we are so many lay figures,

each with a tea-cup in one hand and food in the other; we know that we

are smiling because we can feel it; we remain where we are laid until

forcibly moved to another spot, and we are capable, under pressure, of

emitting a few set phrases that resemble human speech.

Yet within this odd simulacrum of a worldly, entertaining, and

interested gentleman, a living mind surveys the gay scene with a

strange, emotionless detachment--just so, perhaps, will it eventually

survive the body. We are really alive, conscious that we dislike

change, nervous when moved and stood up in another place, and

intellectually certain that no real harm can come to us. One is reminded

of Seneca's observation: _Vere magnum, habere fragilitatem hominis,

securitatem dei._ There is about us something of the frailty of a man,

something of the security of a god; the pity of it is that we cannot

follow Seneca to his conclusion and comfort ourselves with the thought

that we are 'truly great.'

I have often wondered, while 'dolling up,' as the strikingly appropriate

modernism puts it, for such a function, whether there is any universal

reason why a reluctant man should go to an afternoon tea. There are, of

course, many individual reasons, more or less important to the

individual tea-goer; but for us the impulsion comes inevitably from

without. The verb 'drag,' often applied to the process by which a man is

brought to a tea, indicates how valuable would be the discovery of a

Universal Reason wherefore any man might hope to derive some personal

good from this inescapable experience.

An excellent place for the thinker to examine this problem is in his

bath-tub preparatory to dolling up. He is alone and safe from

interruption, unless he has forgotten to lock the door; his memory and

observation of afternoon teas past is stimulated by afternoon tea to

come; and he is himself more like the Universal Man than on most other

occasions. Featherless biped mammals that we are, what need have we in

common that might conceivably provide a good and sufficient reason for

the dolling up to which I am about to subject myself? Substantial food,

less fleeting, however, than a lettuce or other sandwich and a dainty

trifle of pastry; protective clothing; a house, or even a cave, to

shelter us in cold or stormy weather--these, evidently, are clearly

apprehended necessities, and we will march on the soles of our feet,

like the plantigrade creatures we are, wherever such goods are

obtainable.

If all men were hungry, naked, and homeless, and the afternoon tea

provided food, clothes, and a home, any man would jump at an invitation.

But there are other necessities of living--and here, too, I in my

porcelain dish am one with Christopher Columbus, Lord Chesterfield,

Chang the Chinese Giant, the Editor of the _Atlantic_, and the humblest

illiterate who never heard of him--of which we are not so vividly

conscious. Yet we seek them instinctively, each in his own manner and

degree--amusement, useful experience, friends, and his own soul. So I

read and accept Tagore when he says, 'Man's history is the history of

man's journey to the unknown in quest of his immortal self--his soul.'

Willy-nilly, even higglety-pigglety and helter-skelter, these are what

the featherless biped is after.

As for useful experience, this afternoon tea reminds me of those lower

social gatherings where liquor is, or used to be, sold only to be drunk

on the premises. Granting that I become a finished tea-goer, easy of

speech, nodding, laughing, secure in the graceful manipulation of my

tea-things, never upsetting my tea, never putting my sandwich in the way

of an articulating tongue, yet is all this experience of no use whatever

to me except at other afternoon teas. I go to school simply to learn how

to go to school. The most finished and complete tea-goer, if he behaves

anywhere else as he does at an afternoon tea, creates more widely the

same unfavorable impression that he creates, in his own proper sphere,

on me. Can I then reasonably regard experience as useful which I observe

to be useful only for doing something which I observe to be useless? The

soap agrees that I cannot. Yet, says the sponge, _if_ I might hope at

some afternoon tea to discover my immortal soul, the case would be

different; this experience would be valuable. O foolish sponge! I am

compelled to tell you that at afternoon teas it is especially difficult

for a mortal gentleman to believe that he has any immortal soul to look

for. It is a gathering essentially mundane and ephemeral. For it we put

on our most worldly garments. For it we practise our most worldly smirks

in dumb rehearsal before our mirror and an audience of one silly,

attentive image, thinking that this time, this time--But it is always

the same: the observant mind in the immovable body. As for the immortal

soul, O sponge! it may, and doubtless does, go to strange places--but it

_cannot be dragged_.

And so we come to the final question: is the afternoon tea a place where

one featherless, plantigrade, biped mammal of the genus _Homo_ may meet

another whom he might hope some time to call a friend? I do not mean 'my

friend What's-his-name?' but rather such another biped as Tennyson had

in mind when he wrote,--

Since we deserved the name of friends

And thine effect so lives in me,

A part of mine may live in thee

And move thee on to noble ends.

I grant you, peering out of my tub at the world, that there are many to

whom this thought sounds sublimated and extravagant: a poet says this

sort of thing because such is his poetic business. We come nearer

perhaps to the universal understanding in John Hay's definition that

'Friends are the sunshine of life'; for it is equally true that all men

seek sunlight and that every man seeks a friend after his own kind and

nature. The best and most intelligent of us admit the rarity and value

of friendship; the worst and most ignorant of us are unwittingly the

better for knowing some friendly companion. But these afternoon teas are

inimical to friendship; and the first duty of a hostess is to separate,

expeditiously and without hope of again coming together, any other two

guests who appear to be getting acquainted. On this count, even were we

not Automaton Tea-Goers, debarred by inherent stability from any normal

human intercourse, the afternoon tea must prove more disheartening than

helpful. We might at best glimpse a potential friend as the desert

islander sights a passing sail on the far horizon.

There is, alas, no Universal Reason why a man should go to an afternoon

tea!

So the matter looks to me in my tub, but perhaps, like Diogenes, I am a

cynic philosopher. After all, when a thing cannot be escaped, why seek

for reasons not to escape it? Let us, rather, be brave if we cannot be

gay; cheerful if we cannot talk; ornamental if we cannot move. As the

grave-digger in Elsinore churchyard might say: 'Here lies the afternoon

tea; good: here stands the gentleman; good: If the gentleman go to this

afternoon tea and bore himself, it is, will he, nill he, he goes,--mark

you that? But if the afternoon tea come to him and bore him, he bores

not himself; argal, he that goes not willingly to the afternoon tea

wearies not his own life.'

So, in effect, he that is _dragged_ to an afternoon tea does not go at

all; and when he gets there, he is really somewhere else. This happy

thought is a little difficult to reconcile with circumstances; but when

one has become thoroughly soaked in it, it is a great help.

THE END

Transcriber's Note:

Minor typographical errors have been corrected without note.

End of Project Gutenberg's The Perfect Gentleman, by Ralph Bergengren

The Perfect Gentleman · 第 4 / 4 段