THE HAMLET IN THE HAYMARKET.

With Mr. TREE's impersonation of _Hamlet_ most London playgoers

are by this time acquainted, though not yet familiar. It is a

most interesting performance, especially to those who remember

the inauguration of startling new departures by CHARLES FECHTER.

The question for every fresh _Hamlet_ must always be, "How can I

differentiate my _Hamlet_ from all previous _Hamlets_? What can I

do that nobody has as yet thought of doing?" "To be or not to be"

_Hamlet_, "that is the question"; whether 'tis better continuously to

suffer the tortures of uncertainty as to what you might have achieved

had you essayed the part, or to take up the study of it, and ceasing

to shiver on the bank, leave off your damnable faces, and plunge in?

Mr. TREE has plunged, and is going on swimmingly.

Mrs. TREE's _Ophelia_ sane, is charming. Her distraught _Ophelia_ is

very mad indeed, and her method in her madness is excellent.

[Illustration: "I am thy Father's Ghost!"]

There is a curious monotony in some of the stage-business. Thus,

_Ophelia_ pauses in her exit and comes up quietly behind the

absent-minded Prince as if to play bo-peep with him: then, later on,

after his apparently brutal treatment of her, _Hamlet_ returns, and,

while he is stooping and in tears, he kisses her hair and runs away

noiselessly as if this also were another part of the same game. Then

again, in the Churchyard, after the scandalous brawling (brought

about by the stupid ignorance of a dunderheaded ecclesiastic, to whose

Bishop _Laertes_ ought to have immediately reported him), _Hamlet_

returns to weep and throw flowers into the grave. Now excellent

"returns" are dear to the managerial heart, and consoling to his

pocket, when they attest the overflowing attendance of "friends in

front;" but when "returns" are on the stage, their excellence may be

questioned on the score of monotony. Now, as to the Churchyard Scene,

permit me to make a suggestion:--the Second Gravedigger has been

commissioned by the First Gravedigger, with money down, to go to a

neighbouring publican of the name of YAUGHAN, pronounced Yogan or

Yawn,--probably the latter, on account either of his opening his mouth

wide, or of his being a sleepy-headed fellow,--and fetch a stoop of

liquor. Now, when all the turmoil is over, the remaining gravedigger

would at once set to work, as in fact he does in this scene at the

Haymarket; but here he just shovels a handful of mould into the grave,

and then, without rhyme or reason (with both of which he has been

plentifully supplied by SHAKSPEARE), suddenly away he goes, merely to

allow for the "business" of _Hamlet's_ re-entrance. But why shouldn't

there be here, prior to the return of _Hamlet_, a re-entrance of the

Second Gravedigger, as if coming back from friend YAUGHAN's with

the pot of ale? The sight of this would attract First Gravedigger,

and take the thirsty soul most readily from his work to discuss

the refreshment in some shady nook. Then by all means let _Hamlet_

return to pour out his grief; and on this picture ought the Curtain

effectively descend.

A novel point introduced by Mr. TREE is that his _Hamlet_,

entertaining an affectionate remembrance of the late YORICK, assumes a

friendly and patronising air towards YORICK's successor, a Court Fool,

apparently so youthful that he may still be supposed to be learning

his business. So when His Royal Highness _Hamlet_ has what he

considers "a good thing" to say, Mr. TREE places the novice in jesting

near himself, and pointedly speaks at him; as e.g., when, in reply to

the King's inquiry after his health, he tells him that he "eats air

promise-crammed," adding, with a sly look at the Court Fool, "you

cannot feed capons so." Whereat the Fool, put into a difficult

position, through his fear of offending the Prince by _not_ laughing,

or angering the King (his employer) by laughing, has to acknowledge

the Prince's witticism with a deferential, but somewhat deprecatory,

snigger.

Again, when _Hamlet_ is "going to have a lark" with old _Polonius_--a

proceeding in exquisitely bad taste by the way--Mr. TREE's _Hamlet_

attracts the young Court Jester's attention to his forthcoming

novelty. Now this time, as the repartee is about as rude a thing

as any vulgar cad of an 'ARRY might have uttered, the professional

Jester, who evidently does not owe his appointment to the Lord

Chamberlain's favour, and is exempt from his jurisdiction, grins

all over his countenance, and hops away to explain the jest to some

of the courtiers, while _Hamlet_ himself, to judge by his smiling

countenance, is clearly very much pleased with his own performance

in showing a Jester how the fool should be played. And this notion

is consistent with the character of a Prince who takes upon himself

to lecture the Actors on their own art. There is no subtler touch in

SHAKSPEARE's irony than his putting these instructions to players

in the mouth of a noble amateur. Of the revival, as a whole, one

may truthfully say, _Ça donne à penser_, and, indeed, the study of

_Hamlet_ is inexhaustible.

* * * * *

Punch, Or the London Charivari, Volume 102, April 16, 1892 · 第 15 / 30 题