In the Vulgate, the 14th verse of the 1st chapter of St. John’s Epistle

commences thus: “_Et Verbum caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis_.”

The bell also bears a cross made of a series of stars, and two small

designs in relief placed in duplicate on opposite sides, representing

the one the Virgin and Child, and the other, a saint, probably St.

George or St. Michael.

The bell, in the opinion of an expert to whom a photograph was sent, is

certainly Spanish; the cross and letter are from fifteenth-century

moulds, but the small designs are later, probably sixteenth century. In

casting, old moulds were frequently used. The cross is decidedly

Spanish.

In September 1692, the Council wrote home, “Port Royal which was our

chief stay and where we could muster two thousand effective men is,

since the earthquake, reduced to about two hundred men.”

The old plan of Port Royal which was reproduced on page 442 of the “West

India Committee Circular” of September 23, 1913, was formerly in the

Dockyard there, having been presented to that office by Commodore the

Hon. W. J. Ward, in August 1880. It was handed over to the Institute of

Jamaica by the last commodore after the dockyard was given up. It is

obviously a copy of an older plan in the Colonial Secretary’s office. In

mistake it is stated on it that the original plan was surveyed in June

1857. It should have been 1827.

The wording on the original plan is as follows: “A general plan of the

town, forts and fortifications, etc., of Port Royal, performed by an

order from His Grace William, Duke of Manchester, Captain-General and

Governor-in-Chief of His Majesty’s Island of Jamaica and the territories

thereon depending in America, Chancellor and Vice-Admiral of the same.

Surveyed in June 1827 by Philip A. Morris, Crown Surveyor.”

On the original plan are the following notes: “All within the yellow

lines is Crown property.” “The blue lines represent the town of Port

Royal before the great earthquake of 1692.” “The red line is what

remained of the town after the earthquake.” “The ochre colouring

represents the town as it now stands.” “True copy from Morris, original

Survey. The blue, red and yellow lines added by me.” (Signed) Thos.

Harrison, Govt. Surveyor, 20th September, 1870; (Signed) J. R. Mann, D.

of Rds. and Surveyor-General, 24th October, 1870.

The following interesting experience of a diver during his visit to

submerged Port Royal, appeared in the “Falmouth Post,” of October 7,

1859.

SIR,—Being aware that many erroneous statements regarding my

explorations of old Port Royal have been circulated, I beg to offer

the public, through the medium of your valuable journal, the following

statement, should you deem it worthy a place in your columns.

I first went down on the remains of the old Port Royal on the 29th

August, and found that what I had heard with regard to some of the

buildings being seen when the water was clear was correct. I landed

among the remains of ten or more houses, the walls of which were from

3 to 10 feet above the sand. The day was rather cloudy and I could

only get a view of a small portion at a time.

After repairing H.M. Ship _Valorous_, I went down again on the 9th

instant, at what is called at Port Royal, “The Church Buoy,” but which

ought to be called the “Fort Buoy,” it being placed on the remains of

old Fort James; but the day was unfavourable, the water being muddy—so

that I could not see much; and being impressed with the idea that it

must have been the remains of the church on which I was, my

explorations that day were not satisfactory. About 12 o’clock (being

then down four hours) the water cleared a little, and getting a better

view I concluded that the ruins which I was on must have been those of

a fort. But soon after I found a large granite stone somewhat the

shape and size of a tombstone, which was covered with a coral

formation, so that I could not tell whether it had an inscription or

not. Fancying this stone to have been a tombstone, thereby indicating

the vicinity of a churchyard, I was not satisfied what the character

of the building could have been. I came to the surface about 1 o’clock

determined to wait a more favourable day. In the meantime Mr. de Pass

was so good as to obtain for me, from the collection of Henry

Hutchings, Esq., a map of the old town as it stood before the

earthquake, by which I learnt that the ruins, of the nature of which I

had all along my doubts, were in fact the ruins of old Fort James, and

that the Church stood about the east end of the present dockyard.

Monday, the 19th instant, being a very clear day, I went down about 2

o’clock, and had a very good view of the Fort. At times I could see

objects 100 feet each away from me. The Fort forms an obtuse angle to

the west, on a line with the north end of the hospital—the wall of the

angle runs in a N.E. direction, the other in a S.S.E. The walls are

built of brick, and are as solid as so much rock. I have traced and

examined several of the embrasures and have no doubt but that the guns

in them are covered with coral; that known as “brain stone,” being

large and numerous on the fort. After being down about two hours, I

found an iron gun in one of the embrasures almost covered in the

ruins, with a heavy copper chain to the breech. After sending up the

gun next day, I found the end of another chain not far from where the

gun lay. On heaving it out of the sand and mud, I found it was

attached to a granite stone similar to the one I had seen before. I

have no doubt these stones were part of the embrasures and that the

copper chains were used for slinging the guns. The gun which I found

had no trunnions to it, and therefore could not have been used on a

carriage.

I am of opinion, from what I have seen of old Port Royal, that many of

the houses remained perfect after the earthquake, though sunk in the

water, and that the sand has been thrown up, and the mud settled

around and in them from time to time, until all the largest buildings

are covered over, so that the remains of the houses which I have seen

may have been the top part of the highest buildings; which is

apparently the case from the irregularity of the heights.

I intend paying another visit to the ill-fated town, in a week or two;

and I will take the first opportunity of informing you, and through

you the public, of anything new that may come to my notice.

I remain, Sir, &c.,

(Sgd.) JEREMIAH D. MURPHY.

It would be interesting to know what became of the gun referred to.

Port Royal as a town, never recovered from the effects of the earthquake

of June 17, 1692.

Shortly after, the town of Kingston rose on the mainland across the

harbour, and thither much of the wealth of Port Royal went, and the

principal commercial and shipping street was not unnaturally called Port

Royal Street.

In August 1702, brave old Benbow sailed into Port Royal after his fight

with Du Casse off Santa Marta, extending over five days (a fight which,

thanks to his cowardly captains, was one of the darkest blots on

Britannia’s shield) only to die here of his wounds two months later....

He was buried in Kingston parish church.

In 1703 arrived from Massachusetts one good foot company of volunteers,

“the first men in armes that ever went out of this Province, or from the

Shoar of America”: they were intended for a further expedition.

In January 1703–04, a fire destroyed that part of Port Royal which the

earthquake had spared. The occurrence is thus described by Christian

Lilly: “Between 11 and 12 of the clock in the morning a fire hapn’d thro

carelessness to break out in a warehouse at Port Royall which before

night consumed all ye Town, and left not one house of it standing, by

which meanes a great many people, especially merchants are ruin’d. For

this Town being scituated upon a small Cay, now, of about Thirty Acres

of Land surrounded with the sea, and the whole place taken up with

houses and the streets and lanes extreamly narrow, the poor people had

not that conveniency of saving their goods as might have been expected

in a place where they might have been more at large.”

In 1708, Admiral Sir Charles Wager, commander-in-chief of Jamaica, met

and conquered a Spanish treasure ship, and though, owing to the

cowardice of two of his captains, much of the treasure (said to have

been worth from four to ten millions) was lost, Wager became a wealthy

man. During his command (1707–9), a greater number of prizes were taken

than at any former period of like duration.

On March 23, 1692–93, Beeston, in writing home, had said: “But there is

little of Port Royal left, being now a perfect island of about

twenty-five acres and too small to hold the trade and people.” After the

fire a bill was passed in the Assembly to prevent the re-settling of the

town, but this was warmly opposed and in October 1703 another bill was

passed entitled “an Act for making the Key, whereon Fort Charles and

Fort William are erected, a port of entry”; and in a letter written from

Jamaica in 1712, Port Royal is referred to as a “small island about

fourteen miles from Spanish Town”: In 1716, William Wood, in his preface

to “The Laws of Jamaica” says, “The Town of Port Royal, formerly much

larger and very populous, is built on a key, which before the great

earthquake, joyned to an Isthmus of Land that divides the sea and the

Harbour of Kingston,” and there is additional evidence that, at various

stages in the history of the Palisadoes, channels were formed by the sea

across what is, after all, nothing but a string of islands more or less

closely connected by drifted sand and stone. And an engraving, in Long’s

History, as late as 1774, shows it as an island.

A manuscript chart, in the Institute of Jamaica, entitled “A plan of the

Harbour of Port Royal in Jamaica, survey’d in the year 1724, and

carefully examin’d in the year 1728, by Capt. John Gascoigne,” tells of

the severe shocks which the town and harbour have received within

historic times. As we see by the map, the hurricane of 1722 once more

cut it off from the isthmus to which it is now connected, if, indeed,

the passage existing ten years before had silted up.

Professor Robert T. Hill, in “The Geology and Physical Geography of

Jamaica,” writes:

The Kingston formation is the oldest of the formations of old gravel

and other alluvium occurring upon the plains of the Liguanea type.

This is the formation upon which the city of Kingston and suburbs are

built, including the strip of land known as the Palisades, and the

plain extending back of Kingston to the foot of the mountains. The

material consists of boulders, gravel, and pebble of varying sizes,

usually very angular, and representing every known material of the

Blue Mountain series. These are embedded in a matrix of dull red

arenaceous clay, producing a chocolate soil and derived from the Minho

beds so completely exposed _in situ_ in the mountains north of

Kingston.

With reference to the chart, Mr. Charlton Thompson, R.N., the harbour

master, wrote in 1907 as follows:

“I have always been of opinion that the Palisadoes were originally

coral cays joined gradually by sand-spits. To my knowledge of Port

Royal Point (thirty-one years), I am sure it had grown out about 50

feet during that time, which portion sank during the last earthquake;

and the depressions or subsidences which took place then were all

made-up land. There were also subsidences in the Palisadoes.”

The following account of the hurricane of 1722 above referred to is from

“A Voyage to Guinea, Brasil, and the West Indies; in His Majesty’s ships

the _Swallow_ and _Weymouth_” by John Atkins, a naval surgeon (2nd

edition, London, 1737).

The present hurricane was a week after our arrival; began at eight in

the morning, two days before the change of the moon, gave at least

forty-eight hours notice, by a noisy breaking of the waves upon the

kays, very disproportioned to the breeze, a continued swell, without

reflux of the water; and the two nights preceding, prodigious

lightnings and thunder; which all the old experienced men foretold

would be a hurricane; or that one already had happened at no great

distance. I was ashore at _Port Royal_ and found all the pilots

returned from the windward part of the island, (where they customarily

attend the coming down of ships,) and observing upon the unusual

intumescence of the water, so great the day before, and beat so high,

that our boats could not possibly put on shore at _Gun Kay_ to take

the men off that were set there, to the number of twenty, for trimming

up our cask; themselves making signals not to attempt it. Betimes next

morning, the wind began in flurrys at N.E. and flew quickly round to

S.E. and S.S.E. where it continued the stress of the storm, bringing

such quantities of water, that our little island was overflowed 4 foot

at least; so that what with the fierce driving of shingles (wooden

staves used instead of tiling upon their houses) about our ears, and

the water floating their boats, empty hogheads, and lumber about the

streets, those without doors were every moment in danger of being

knocked on the head, or carried away by the stream. Within it was

worse, for the waters sapping the foundations, gave continual and just

apprehensions of the houses falling, as in effect half of them did,

and buried their inhabitants! Nor indeed after the storm had began,

was it safe to open a door, especially such as faced the wind, lest it

should carry the roofs off; and escaping thence, there was no place of

retreat, we remaining in a very melancholly scituation, both from wind

and water. _The perils of false brethren was nothing to it._ It may be

worth notice, what became of the purser in this common danger; I was

regardless at first, as suspecting more of timidity in the people,

till finding myself left alone proprietor of a shaking old house, the

streets full of water and drift, with shingles flying about like

arrows; I began to meditate a little more seriously upon my safety,

and would have compounded all my _credit_ in the victualling, my

hoops, and bags, for one acre (as _Gonzalo_ says in the _Tempest_) _of

barren ground, long heath, or brown furze_, to have trod dry upon. Our

neighbours had retreated towards the church, as the strongest

building, and highest ground, which I was luckily too late to recover;

but endeavouring to stem upwards for a safer station, was taken into a

house in the lower street, with an old woman wading in the same manner

from her ruined habitation. We were no sooner in, but new fears of

this also falling, thrust us into the yard (the water then at eleven

o’clock, breast high) where we helped one another upon a low

brick-built outhouse, that being more out of the wind, and surrounded

with others, kept the water still. The unhappiness of those who

suffered in stronger, was their facing the wind, which brought the sea

upon them with violence. A platform of one and twenty guns and mortars

were drove some of them to the market-place; the two lines of houses

next the sea, with the church, was undermined and levelled with the

torrent, and in their ruin was our safety; for altho’ we had a greater

depth, they were by such a bank made motionless. The whole rise of the

water was computed at 16 or 18 foot, very admirable at a place where

it is not ordinarily observed to flow above one or two. At 5 in the

evening the waters abated, and with so quick a retreat as to leave the

streets dry before 6; when every one was congratulating his own safety

in condolancies upon the loss of their friends. Of 50 sail in this

harbour, only four men-of-war and 2 merchant ships rid it out, but

with all their masts and booms blown away. All the men we left at _Gun

Kay_ were washed off and perished, except one _Indian_ that drove into

harbour upon a broken gallows that had been there erected. Wrecks and

drowned men were everywhere seen along shore; general complaints of

loss at land (least at _St. Jago_) which made it a melancholy scene,

and to finish the misfortune, the slackness of the sea-breezes, calms,

and lightning, stagnating waters, broods of insects thence, and a

shock or two of earthquake that succeeded to the hurricane, combined

to spread a baneful influence, and brought on a contagious distemper,

fatal for some months through the island. There being no volcanos, the

earthquakes felt here are always after great rains, on a parched earth

that admits their penetration; and possibly nigher the coast, as at

_Port Royal_, may be from the sea in a long process of time

undermining in some manner a loose earth, or finding in its deep

recesses new caverns; or subterranean heats working towards them, the

dreadful contest shocks.

The hurricane occurred on the tenth anniversary of one that visited

Jamaica on August 28, 1712. In it about four hundred persons perished,

and August 28 was appointed by the House of Assembly as a “perpetual

anniversary fast.”

At this time it was “ordered that all masters of sloops and vessels

employed as sugar-drogers in and about this island, shall before they

are permitted to pass His Majesty’s fort at Port Royal, be obliged to

bring one load of stones each, in order to repair the damages done to

the fortifications by the late hurricane.” The Marquis Duquesne got into

trouble with the assembly owing to the manner in which he enforced the

order, and generally in his duties as captain of the fort, and had to

vindicate his position, in “The Marquis Duquesne vindicated in a letter

to a noble lord,” published in 1728.

In a petition presented by the garrison of Fort Charles to a committee

of the Assembly that was inspecting the fort in September 1725, the

following representations occur:

That abundance of us from time to time have been swept away into our

graves; besides several of us, by reson of divers sorts of lingering

distempers, are rendered incapable of doing further service:

“... You are sensible, sirs, our beds are the hard stones, our

covering nothing but the expanded canopy of the heavens! This

certainly is very grievous, especially when we see the company at

Spanish-Town lie in beds, and having barracks fit for men of their

function. Are they more loyal subjects, or more dutiful soldiers, than

we are? Be it far from us to reflect on them or their happiness! but

with sorrow and regret we behold our own misfortunes.

In 1733 Fort Charles was considered not sufficient protection to

Kingston Harbour and a fort at Mosquito Point was suggested; this was

the origin of Fort Augusta.

In 1734 was passed an act to vest Lands in Port Royal in His Majesty,

His Heirs and Successors for the use of His ships of war. The property

consisted of “Lands, tenements, hereditaments or shoal water.” The act,

in the edition of 1738, is accompanied by a plan of land proposed to be

acquired to the north-east of Port Royal. From this it appears that

there was at the time a town wall on the sea front.

In the first half of the eighteenth century smuggling was prevalent in

the British colonies, and subject to violent repression on the part of

Spain. The well-known case in 1731 of Robert Jenkins, master of the brig

_Rebecca_, who lost his ear on his way from Jamaica to London was not

unique. Rear-Admiral Stewart, who then commanded on the Jamaica station,

saw that the fault lay largely with the Jamaica merchants, but the

English merchants made their wrongs felt in the House of Parliament, and

Vernon was amongst their warmest supporters. He pleaded for the

destruction of Porto Bello (where the Spanish guardacostas fitted out),

and offered to effect it with six ships; which he did to his own renown

and the gratification of the English nation in general and the Jamaica

merchants in particular. While in command on the Jamaica station, Vernon

issued an order, which was quickly adopted by the Admiralty, and made

marked improvement in the discipline and efficiency of the British navy,

and enriched the English language with the word grog. The order was to

the effect that the sailors should qualify their rum with water—a quart

of water to half a pint of rum. The sailors did not like their “grog,”

as they nicknamed the new drink, adopting the nickname of Vernon,

derived, it is said, from his using a grogram boat cloak.

Writing about 1740, Leslie, in his “New and Exact Account of Jamaica,”

says:—“Port Royal was once the fairest seaport in America, it flowed in

Riches and Trade, now it is only a small place, but yet it consists of

three handsome streets, several cross lanes and a fine Church. They have

a Hospital for sick or disabled Sailors, and there is lately built a

Yard for the King’s Naval Stores and conveniency of Workmen employed

about His Majesty’s Ships of War.”

Although doubt had been expressed as to the wisdom of appointing Port

Royal as a rendezvous, “for fear of the soldiers staying too long there,

and getting sickness, by drinking too much rum, as has usually been the

case,” on January 17, 1740–41, by far the largest force that ever

assembled in Jamaica waters was gathered together. On that day

twenty-four ships of the line under Sir Chaloner Ogle, with nine

thousand soldiers under Brigadier Wentworth, reached Port Royal as a

reinforcement for Vernon’s fleet. The attempt on Cartagena was a

miserable failure, owing to divided command, lack of ability on

Wentworth’s part, disease caused by the rainy season, and general

mismanagement, which was exposed by Smollett, the novelist, who was

surgeon’s mate on one of Ogle’s vessels. He married a Jamaica lady (the

original of Narcissa in “Roderick Random”) and lived for a time in

Jamaica.

Ill-feeling also between Vernon and Wentworth was responsible for the

lack of success which attended the attack on St. Jago de Cuba.

During a storm in 1744 the larger part of the fleet was luckily at sea

under Sir Chaloner Ogle, but there were in the harbour nine men-of-war

and ninety-six merchant-ships. One hundred and four were stranded,

wrecked or foundered, so that only the _Rippon_ rode it out with the

loss of her masts. A great number of marines perished.

We learn from a petition from the inhabitants of Port Royal to the

Assembly, in October 1751, that during the hurricane of that year, the

sea “by forcing up the sand to a level with the wall, has rendered it

quite unserviceable, as it gained, by that means, a free and easy

passage into the town, and filled the greatest part of it with such a

quantity of water, that many of the inhabitants, in the extremity of the

weather, were obliged to abandon their houses, and fly for shelter to

places of greater safety.” It then appeared that the law of 1717

arranging for the repairing of the wall had been a dead letter since

1737.

When Rodney assumed command in 1771, he found that apartments only were

provided for the admiral at Port Royal, and it was doubtless due to his

action that “Admiral’s Pen” near Kingston (the present poor-house), was

purchased just before he left in 1774. One of the chief objects to which

he devoted his attention while on this station was the watering of the

fleet—the water having hitherto been purchased by the naval authorities;

and he, after investigation at Kingston and the Rio Cobre, decided on

Rock Fort, Vernon’s old spot, at =Harbour Head= as a source of supply.

The sailors, when they found themselves spared the task of rolling heavy

water casks long distances in the hot sun, said “God bless the Admiral,”

but when they realized that improved methods of watering meant shorter

leave on shore, they changed their tune and said, “The devil take the

Admiral.”

Till about the year 1902, when pipes were laid along the Palisadoes to

Port Royal, that town had its water conveyed to it, from Rodney’s source

at Rock Fort, in a sailing ship fitted for the purpose.

Rodney, in order to get timely notice of the approach of foreign ships,

had a look-out erected on the top of the Healthshire Hills on the

opposite side of the harbour from Port Royal; and on the site of

=Rodney’s Look-out= there is still a mark for navigation.

It is quite likely that during the voyage which Nelson made to the West

Indies in 1771–72 in a merchant ship he visited Jamaica, as the ship

belonged to a Jamaica firm; but no such visit has been recorded.

On September 19, 1771, Rodney wrote from Port Royal:

Historic Jamaica · 第 7 / 37 段