In the great days of his preaching, he took us who were his

Produced by Mark C. Orton, Barbara Kosker and the Online

Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net

[Illustration]

FRANK NELSON _of_ CINCINNATI

_Writing is the offspring of thought, the lamp of

remembrance, the tongue of him that is far-off, and

the life of him whose age has been blotted out._

--_Anon_

[Illustration]

_Frank H Nelson

of CINCINNATI_

_by_

WARREN C. HERRICK

_a sometime Assistant_

_With A Foreword

by Charles P. Taft_

LOUISVILLE . THE CLOISTER PRESS . MCMXLV

COPYRIGHT, 1945, BY

The Cloister Press

_All rights reserved. No part of this

book may be reproduced without the

written permission of The Cloister Press._

[Illustration: _The Cloister Press_

VITAL BOOKS]

PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

_To My Wife_

CONTENTS

Page

1. "Arise, and go into the city" 2

2. Reclaiming A Church to Meet A New Age 14

3. The Shepherd Among His Flock 30

4. The Spokesman of The City's Conscience 42

5. They Came to Be in His Presence 62

6. Beyond Cincinnati 76

7. The Mystery of Personality 88

8. Last Years 102

9. The Afterglow 110

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This book is made possible only through the interest and contributions

of the many friends of Frank H. Nelson. Space does not permit my

mentioning by name all who have furnished me with material, but I do

wish to record my gratitude to them. In addition to the years 1925-1928

as Mr. Nelson's assistant I spent two weeks in the autumn of 1943

interviewing a cross-section of Cincinnati and Christ Church. Many

business men gladly gave of their time because they enjoyed recounting

memories of one whom they loved, and often detained me when I felt I had

imposed myself long enough. I noticed also that Mr. Nelson's photograph

occupied a place of honor in more than one office as well as in many

homes.

There are others far better qualified than I to write this story, and I

accepted the task, though with a keen sense of my inadequacy, first,

because Mrs. Nelson honored me with the request, and second because I

have the strong conviction that it should be done for the sake of those

who knew Mr. Nelson, and also for those of a succeeding generation who

ought to know how one minister more than met the requirements of an

exacting profession. Furthermore, I have written as one who owes an

incalculable debt, and, therefore, cannot be wholly objective. While I

have endeavored not to make this biography a eulogy, it is frankly his

life as I saw it, and depicts one whom I loved, admired, and have tried

to follow.

For innumerable suggestions and for valuable material I am particularly

grateful to Mrs. Frank H. Nelson, to Mr. Nelson's sisters, Miss

Margaret[1] and Miss Dorothea Nelson, and to Mr. Howard N. Bacon, who

have helped me more than perhaps they know. Then there is the pleasant

duty of expressing my thanks to Mr. Charles P. Taft, the Junior Warden

of Christ Church, Cincinnati, for writing the foreword; to the Vestry of

Trinity Church, Melrose, Massachusetts for gladly granting me a leave of

absence in 1943, and to Mrs. E. Howard Favor, my secretary, for the

typing cheerfully undertaken. In the labor of preparing the final draft

for the publishers I shall ever remember with gratitude the careful

thought and skillful phrasing of Miss Mary Putnam of the English

Department of the Melrose High School whose corrections and amendments

were nothing less than creative. Finally, I wish to let stand my

heartfelt thanks to the Right Reverend Henry Knox Sherrill, Bishop of

Massachusetts, without whose encouragement and advice this little book

could not have been written.

WARREN C. HERRICK

_Trinity Church_,

_Melrose, Massachusetts_;

1945.

FOOTNOTES:

[1] Deceased, July 6, 1945.

A FOREWORD

How does one life affect another?

I have tried to remember what Frank Nelson directly asked me to do. He

asked me to teach in the Sunday School, and I did it. Gradually I found

myself studying out an intellectual foundation for faith in God. He

never said anything to me about that, except from the pulpit. He wrote

me asking that I act as captain in the Nation-wide Campaign, and I

answered that I could not. But the next thing I remember was being a

visitor in the Nation-wide Campaign, and I was always in it after that.

He asked me to serve on the Vestry, and somehow made me feel that

nothing except being really sick was an excuse for not being there.

Certainly he never exhorted people to be civic patriots or reformers,

and save the city. He just gave you such a human picture of the teeming

life of a great city that it made a tear come to your eye to think of

what the city could be at its best, and it made you love it and the

people in it. Your own actions in civic affairs just naturally followed.

He wasn't an exhorter of virtue, but he made of clean living and noble

service such a fascinating objective that people went to work on their

own problems with fresh faith.

The only time I recall he was really annoyed with me was when I had an

emergency operation for appendicitis in the middle of the night, and

didn't let him know until the next day. He was my minister, and that

meant _minister_. After that, when I had a major choice to make, I felt

I was risking his disappointment unless I went down to talk to him about

it.

He didn't want me to go to a great school as headmaster. "The city is

the place that needs service and talents," said he. To that he had given

his life, in the personal contact with his parish. His life stands as a

symbol of the way a true love of home and community is tied to a love of

all God's children everywhere.

CHARLES P. TAFT

_Arise, And Go

Into The City_

"_Arise, And Go Into The City_"

--_Acts 9:6_

1

"Tell the rector of Christ Church that if he doesn't call off the

Woman's Club, I'll bring the women of the streets to the polls." And he

added, "He knows I can do it." The boss of old Ward Eight, in which

Christ Episcopal Church in downtown Cincinnati is located, had become

alarmed by a serious threat to his power. Although this incident took

place long before the coming of universal suffrage, Reverend Frank H.

Nelson, the young rector, had discovered that women had a legal right to

vote in public school matters. Following his leadership, the Woman's

Club of Christ Church was actively supporting as a candidate for the

Board of Education John R. Schindel, a fearless young lawyer in the

Ward. This independent action was an open challenge to the dominance of

the boss of Ward Eight, Mike Mullen. Though the courageous lawyer was

defeated, and without the aid of the women of the streets, the affair

was one of many which presaged the uprising that eventually wrenched the

control of Cincinnati from the hands of one of the most notorious

political gangs in American democracy.

A second "passage of arms" between the rector and Boss Mullen had its

origin in the work of Christ Church among boys, and ultimately involved

the boss of the entire city and his powerful machine. The privilege of

running gambling games throughout Cincinnati had been alloted to one of

the higher-ups in the organization. Within a block of the Parish House

of Christ Church was a flourishing candy store, so-called, but the chief

"confection" was a crap game run for the boys of the neighborhood under

the direction of a member of the City Council, and with the knowledge

and acquiescence of the police department. It was inevitable that some

members of Christ Church Boys' Clubs should lose their earnings, and

whatever of character the church was building up was thus broken down.

To meet this danger, Mr. Nelson organized a good citizenship club among

his parishioners. The members made a survey of the gambling places which

were catering especially to boys, and found nearly one hundred

throughout the city. The publication of their findings was one of many

"shots heard 'round the ward."[2] When in later years Frank Nelson spoke

for the City Charter or Reform Party, he knew from first-hand experience

the moral and spiritual influence of good government in the lives of

boys and young men. Behind the youthful clergyman's deep concern for

decent government was a vital religious faith, without which he was

convinced social service and reform work can never attain the best

results.

Frank H. Nelson was Rector of Christ Church, Cincinnati, Ohio, from 1900

to 1939, having been the assistant minister in the year 1899. These

forty years in the one parish constitute a career seldom paralleled for

breadth of vision and devoted service. He became one of the first

citizens of a great city, a crusader for honest municipal government,

and the foremost Protestant clergyman. For the understanding of his

ministry and of his religious convictions, one must know something of

his early life and family, and the preparatory years.

Frank Howard Nelson was born in Hartford, Connecticut on September 6,

1869. His father, Henry Wells Nelson, the nephew of the Reverend E. M.

P. Wells, a pioneer in early Christian social service in Boston, was the

Rector of the Church of The Good Shepherd in Hartford. Before Frank was

ten years old, his father accepted a call to Trinity Church, Geneva, New

York, and there exercised a distinguished ministry for twenty-five

years. Geneva, an attractive college town situated on lovely Seneca

Lake, was an ideal place in which to bring up a family. There were five

children: Margaret, George, Frank, Mary, and Dorothea. George now lives

in Brookline, Massachusetts, and Mary, who married Edward L. Pierce,

lives in Princeton, New Jersey. After the father's retirement, Margaret

and Dorothea lived with their parents in the family home at North

Marshfield, Massachusetts where they still reside. Frank was not a

strong child, but in the freedom and simplicity of the life which a

small town affords, he gained strength rapidly. A sister relates that

he was unusually venturesome, and sometimes horrified timid ladies in

the parish by walking on stilts on open rafters, and by frequenting the

canal, where once he fell in and was pulled out by a bargee. As all boys

do, he roamed the environs of his home with his chums, occasionally

pilfering fruit and getting into all kinds of mischief; but though other

boys might go unpunished because of doting parents, he was always firmly

chastised for his pranks.

The influence of both father and mother upon these strong-minded

children was vital and enduring. The father possessed that happy

combination of gaiety and goodness that commends religion. As he was

deeply and naturally spiritual himself, the expression of religion in

his home and parish was unusually beautiful and appealing. The last

twenty-five years of his life were spent in blindness, but his courage

and his deepened understanding of the ways of God because of this

affliction led him to a thankful acceptance of his limitation; and his

continuing interest in people "made the latter years of his ministry,"

to quote Bishop Lawrence, "as fruitful as the more active ones." His

devoted wife, who was Hortense Chew Lewis of New London, Connecticut,

guided the children through their formative years with skill and

understanding. She was an intelligent mother, discriminating in taste

and judgment. Because of her abounding love of good literature, the

family passed many delightful evenings in listening to her readings from

Scott, Milton, Shakespeare and many other great writers. Her fine gifts

of interpretation made the masterpieces of English prose and poetry come

alive. In later years, Christ Church people were to love Frank Nelson's

readings at Christmas parties in the parish house and in his own home.

The older he grew the deeper became his appreciation of the character of

his parents. An intimate friend once said to him, "You are a fortunate

and a blessed man to have had such a father and mother."

The family was privileged in possessing means beyond a minister's

salary, and Frank, at the age of thirteen, was sent to aristocratic St.

Paul's School in Concord, New Hampshire. The headmaster, Dr. Henry A.

Coit, an austere and exacting teacher of the old New England type,

stimulated the natural student, and under his influence Nelson achieved

a scholastic standing among the first five in his class. He was not

particularly skillful in athletics, and had even then a cough which

persisted throughout his life. The lad was not noticeably popular, and

had more than the average measure of shyness peculiar to adolescence. He

was extremely sensitive, somewhat unhappy, and in many accomplishments

and activities was overshadowed by his older brother who was in the same

school.

In the fall of 1886, upon graduation from St. Paul's School, Frank

returned to Geneva and entered Hobart College, a small church college of

considerable standing. There he began to find himself, and became one of

the popular men in his class and in the Sigma Phi Fraternity. Although

in college he took more active interest in athletics and participated in

rowing, tennis, and track, he never excelled in sports. At his

graduation in 1890 he received the degree of Bachelor of Arts, _Magna

Cum Laude_, being valedictorian and a member of Phi Beta Kappa.

Throughout his life he maintained relationships with his Alma Mater,

coming to know the successive presidents, and in 1907 was instrumental

in securing a large gift for a new gymnasium. Still later he refused the

presidency of the college. In 1906 Hobart bestowed upon him the honorary

degree of Doctor of Sacred Theology.

In the course of his undergraduate days at Hobart, Frank Nelson had

seriously considered the profession of the ministry, but graduation

found him still undecided. As it turned out, the summer following the

close of his college years was one of critical importance to his entire

life. He accompanied a surveying expedition to the state of Washington.

The party put up for a while in Merrysville, a rough-mannered,

tough-living town of the old West. Into this place there came one day a

circuit rider who fearlessly preached the Gospel in the face of

opposition and outright hostility. This Methodist minister was utterly

sincere, and Nelson saw what could be done by the sheer power of the

spirit against the forces of evil. It surged over him that a man can

hold the mastery over wrong, an inner conviction which at the same time

was set aflame by a Communion Service held for the surveyors in the

out-of-doors. The circumstances and surroundings were strikingly

different from those associated in his mind with such a service.

Possibly for the first time in his life he was intensely conscious of

the presence of God. As in all such experiences the vision illumined and

deepened his thinking and living. It has been said that in all great

Christian leaders and reformers are found two elements: "The imperious

commission from above, and the tumultuous experience within." Both these

elements were present in the experiences of that eventful summer, and

all Frank Nelson's doubts and waverings concerning the ministry were

resolved. He returned East aware of being called to preach the Gospel.

In the light of this happening one is not surprised that later when a

professor dogmatically stated that there could be no true Sacrament

without the Apostolic Succession, Nelson walked out of the classroom

saying to himself, "It is a lie." To those who knew him through his

forty years' ministry in Christ Church, this experience in the far West

sheds light upon his burning sense of mission, for in those hours of

inward tumult he had come close to God in the breaking of bread and in

the society of his fellows, conditions which he preached throughout his

life as being always the essence of fellowship with God.

On September 18, 1890, he matriculated at the General Theological

Seminary in New York City. The General Seminary is directly under the

government of the General Convention of the Episcopal Church, and while

it has always been characterized by a conservative type of

churchmanship, all shades of opinion were and are to be found within its

faculty and student body. At this time the respectability of the

Episcopal Church was considered an asset and not a liability, and the

Seminary community was in the social forefront. When an upstanding man

like Frank Nelson, whose background was well-known and whose

intellectual gifts and social graces were obvious, entered this

environment, it was inevitable that he should immediately take a leading

place in the undergraduate body. His tall, commanding figure naturally

attracted notice, and within a few days he was elected president of his

class. There was magnetism in his personality, and he was soon welcomed

among the socially distinguished in both seminary and city. His

fellow-students at General, when speculating about the future, as

students do, always considered him destined for the highest office of

the church; throughout those now remote years he clearly revealed the

qualities of the born leader. His class was a notable one, and through

the passing years gave a good account of itself, listing four bishops

and ten honorary degrees, Frank Nelson himself receiving the degree of

Doctor of Sacred Theology from the General Seminary in 1934.

As a student he excelled in Pastoral Theology, Biblical Learning and

Evidences, subjects which in their nature give some indication of his

intensely human interest in all aspects of life. Like many theological

students, he was groping and feeling his way through the multiple

problems that center upon man in the light of God. One of his classmates

says that the curriculum and the methods of instruction in that day bear

poor comparison to modern standards, but Nelson, unlike many students,

was never in a state of open or even tacit rebellion. He did his work

faithfully and well. He was graduated in 1894, but for some reason was

not present at Commencement to receive the degree of Bachelor of Sacred

Theology, which is the mark of scholastic distinction at General. On May

19, 1894, he was made a deacon in his father's church in Geneva, New

York by the Right Reverend Arthur Cleveland Coxe, the Bishop of Western

New York. During his senior year he had assumed work on the staff of St.

George's Church, New York City, and after his ordination was quickly

absorbed into the work of that great parish. Because he did not feel

ready, Frank Nelson, at his own request, was not advanced to the

priesthood until November 14, 1897, when he was so ordered in St.

George's Church by Bishop Henry Codman Potter of the Diocese of New

York.

Another important element in Mr. Nelson's preparation for his unique

ministry in Cincinnati was this experience on the staff of St. George's

Church from 1894 to 1899 under the prophetic leadership of the Reverend

William S. Rainsford. This notable rector possessed unusual gifts and

exerted an incalculable influence upon the Episcopal Church. He gathered

about him a group of young men the like of whom has never been found

elsewhere. St. George's stands as the pioneer of what was known as the

"institutional church," and in the midst of the teeming activities of

the parish house and a heterogeneous congregation, Dr. Rainsford set

loose his young and enthusiastic assistants. They experienced a training

comparable to the clinical instruction gained by an intern in a modern

hospital. Under his tutelage these men received a course in applied

religion, and their rector set a standard of preaching, parish

administration, and pastoral care that not one of his "boys," as he

called them, failed to practice in an unusual manner. Dr. Rainsford's

impassioned preaching of the essentials of Christianity as opposed to

those aspects which are merely traditional, and his forceful efforts,

radical for those times, to democratize a conventional Episcopal parish

were significant contributions to church life throughout America.

Although Dr. Rainsford exerted a lasting influence upon all his young

assistants, he set his stamp to a marked degree upon Frank Nelson. For

the first time in his life this young man, the choicest flowering of a

cultured home, lived among the underprivileged, spending his afternoons

climbing interminable tenement stairs, and his evenings in the parish

house. He came to know poverty and squalor and the honest worth of

struggling humanity. If "The Rector," as Dr. Rainsford's "boys" called

him, bade them preach on the street corners, he himself had done the

same. His example and his personal religious faith were those of a

living St. George touched with the heart-stirring Gospel of Love. Under

him young Nelson found the services and work of the church taking on a

meaning that was like a cool, refreshing breeze. Things concerning the

Church, doctrine, and ritual, which had formerly perplexed his youthful

mind, now seemed subordinate.

Dr. Rainsford evoked a loyalty which held his young men long after they

had "graduated," and when he died in 1933 at the age of eighty-three,

many of his former assistants were in the chancel of old St. George's

for the burial service. One who was present said, "We shall not see a

service like that again, for we shall never see and know another

Rainsford." Eulogies are not customary at funerals in Episcopal

Churches, but on this occasion the tradition was fittingly broken, and

Mr. Nelson delivered a brief address from the pulpit in a breaking

voice, barely audible at times. In this very moving tribute, the speaker

reveals much of himself:

I am not here to presume to speak of the man we loved in any

formal way; to try to weigh the imponderable, to measure the

immeasurable--but only to say a word out of our hearts of

thanksgiving to God that the rector was our rector in the days

that are passed, was The Rector always and will be always, for

those who knew him, who loved him, to whom he gave that

tremendous love of his.

A book was written by a friend of his some years ago, and the

dedication of that book was this: "To William Stephen Rainsford,

who has seen the Christ and has shown Him to men."

I know of no more perfect description of the rector than that.

For twenty years and more of his rectorship in this great parish

he showed Christ to men; showed Him in the incomparable words

that he poured forth Sunday after Sunday and year after year from

this pulpit--in his great concern for the men and women and

little children; for the strong and for the weak; for the wise

and the foolish; for the saints and the sinners; for those who

labor and were hungry and perplexed, and were strained by the

tasks of life. They came here week by week; they heard from him

the words that refreshed them and sent them back with courage and

with faith in God and in man, to the tasks that were breaking

them, to the problems that were perplexing them.

I suppose that to every one of us who knew him in his great days

here and have known him in the years since, the one supreme thing

that poured out of his life was his love of God. Not the love of

God that theologians speak of, that men reason about, but that

pure love that a man gives to his friend, to his loved

ones--personal, intense, vital, real.

We came here church people, professing the Christian faith,

thinking we believed in God and in His son, Jesus Christ, and as

we sat under the rector here Sunday after Sunday, we came to know

that our profession was a form of sound words, that in him was

the form of unsound words, but that he poured forth _reality_ for

the thing that we _professed_ to believe in, and he helped us to

see the real work of God, the real passionate love of God for

men--not for the chosen few, but the weak, the broken, the

struggling--those in sorrow and the hungry--the love of God that

drove him to lay down his life as few men had laid down their

lives before. He gave of himself without stint, rejoicing in the

chance to serve his God and his fellowmen with his whole heart

and soul, with such passionate devotion that at last broke

through his own conventional beliefs and tore them to shreds, and

made him the voice of the living God, to us in St. George's, to

New York and to America.

In the great days of his preaching, he took us who were his

clergy--young, inexperienced and conceited--and made us over. He

took us, to whom religion was a profession, and made of it a

passion. He was ever patient with us, giving us his best; day

after day walking with us around Stuyvesant Square in the

morning, sometimes for hours, and then pouring out to us as we

walked the best religious thought of his time, his judgment on

the questions of the day, his interpretations of religion and the

tremendous work of the church as a gift that God had put into the

souls of men for service to their fellowmen.

He told us of his thought for men and women, of the problems of

the time, of the problems of the church--not conventional, but

vital, not formal, but distinctly real--and then he would take us

into his study and we would kneel there. And never have I heard a

man pray as the rector prayed--without any of the ecclesiastical

technique and form of prayer, without any formal discussions of

the value of prayer, but pouring out the things that we had been

talking of; as real to God as they were real to us, bringing into

them God; God's companionship, God's sympathy, God's

understanding and patience; God's ruthless will that we should

love our fellowmen and serve our fellowmen--without name, without

a distinction.

That is the vivid life, a little of it, that we lived with, which

made God real to New York and to us here at St. George's, and to

his clergy. God has taken him home, and we meet here, every one

of us, because the rector--broken though he was in these later

years--because the rector, whose great and lovely smile we had

loved to see, as we had loved just to touch his hand to gain

strength, courage, faith and joy--because we cannot do that any

more. His work is done and God gives him a safe lodging and he

shall rest in peace to the last. Thank God who gave him to us, to

know and to love, that we might be lifted by him to find God and

Jesus through him.

He wrote a little prayer, and in closing I am going to read it

and ask you to join with me in making it our own. Let us pray:

Heavenly Father, I am trying to do right and be right and help

others to be right. Give me my daily bread. I am Thy child; Thy

little, weak child. Give me Thy strength; Thy patience; Thy

wisdom; Thy love--that with confidence and with joy I may do the

work Thou hast given me to do in my home and among men. Amen.[3]

The charter of Frank Nelson's future is set forth in the impression he

made at the General Theological Seminary, and in the zest and

enlargement of vision which characterized his five years under Dr.

Rainsford at St. George's. When the opportunity presented itself to

create in Christ Church, Cincinnati, Ohio a work similar to that of St.

George's, he displayed a characteristically wise judgment in making his

decision. Henceforth he was to live "in the upper story" of that

decision, conceiving of his work as a mission to the city, and pursuing

it with a fidelity and a diligence that ranked him as an unusual servant

of God.

FOOTNOTES:

[2] For these stories I am indebted to the Rev. J. Howard Melish, D.D.

whose forthright denunciations of political corruption in Cincinnati

were further "shots heard 'round" the city.

[3] _The Churchman_, January 1st, 1934.

_Reclaiming A Church

To Meet A New Age_

"_By the grace of God, and the loyalty of the

members of Christ Church I was enabled to

carry on the work when Alexis Stein had to

give it up._"

--_Frank H. Nelson_

2

The surging currents of city life had left old Christ Church in a back

eddy, and certain leaders including the senior warden advocated selling

the property or turning it over to the Diocese for a mission. The

population, as in many another American city, was shifting from the

downtown district, and many believed that the parish had seen its best

days. In those late nineties, parishioners of wealth and prominence were

moving to the suburbs; the older, conservative members still attended

the morning service, but the young people either attached themselves to

churches nearer their residences or were drifting away from church

affiliations altogether.

Christ Church was established in 1817 when Cincinnati was a small river

town of nine thousand inhabitants; looking at the present church

building which seats over one thousand people and is flanked by an

enormous and ever busy parish house, one finds it difficult to picture

Bishop Philander Chase meeting in that year with a group of men in the

home of Dr. Daniel Drake to lay the foundations of what was to become

one of the largest parishes in the Middle West. The first services were

held in a cotton factory, and the church slowly developed into a strong

parish, small in numbers but served by several very able rectors, one of

whom later became the Bishop of Virginia. As the first Episcopal Church

to be founded in Cincinnati, it was the parent of a number of other

parishes; but at the close of the nineteenth century it appeared that

the "mother-church" was about finished. Churches of other communions

located in the downtown district were going through the same transition.

The slump in finances by reason of removals created something akin to

panic in the fearful and timid vestrymen, but because of some loyal and

far-sighted women Christ Church was not disbanded. They wanted it to

mean to their children what it meant to them, and they gave assurance of

support in substantial ways.

These ardent supporters had a definite vision and plan. In 1897 Dr.

William S. Rainsford had come on from New York City and had packed old

Pike's Opera House for a week in Lent, and thrilled his hearers with the

recital of his efforts to anchor St. George's Church in the heart of

that great metropolis, and make it free to serve the community. When

Bishop Vincent of Southern Ohio wrote him about the difficulties of

Christ Church, he replied with this momentous letter:

I am going to give you the greatest proof I can of my love and

deep interest in Cincinnati. I have a plan for Christ Church.

Here it is. Take two of my men--let them work and live together;

they could take a mighty strong hold, and do a really good work.

I feel sure that in the future many a position of great

difficulty can be much better occupied by two men, pulling

together, than by one alone. There are two magnificent

fellows--dear, dear boys after my own heart--who have been here

with me for years; and I shall be lost without them, if you call

them. Stein (Alexis) is the ablest preacher of his age (28) in

our Church in these United States today. Nelson (Frank) is a

strong, capable man, full of energy and charm and a first-class

organizer. This is a big idea, my friend; but I believe God may

be in it. It is like offering to cut off both my hands for you.

Thus the Reverend Alexis Stein became Rector of Christ Church in

December, 1898, and within a few weeks of his arrival the people of

Cincinnati awoke to the mighty fact that a prophet was in their midst;

the doors of all churches were flung open to him, and everywhere he

spoke, new interest and hope in the Church were born. Stein has been

called a modern Savonarola, but, unlike the great reformer, he was

burned within by the fire of his own consuming message. "He was a

preacher of most unusual power with a message he burned to give; and a

vision of truth that made him a leader of men. He loved God and showed

Him to men; he loved men and led them to God."[4] Before Stein left New

York, he had asked his friend, Frank Nelson, to join him in the new

venture, but it was not until May 21, 1899 that he was free to come.

We came out to Cincinnati because Dr. Rainsford sent us; he told

us that we ought to come--not that we wanted to come. Stein and I

both had always lived in the East. It was the America that we

knew, and it seemed a desirable place to live, just as those of

you who have been born here think that Cincinnati is the most

desirable place to live, because it is your home. But he, with a

larger vision of America, and a larger vision of the calling of

God to a man in the ministry, sent us here to do what we

could.[5]

In February, 1900, the doctor ordered Alexis Stein out West, a victim of

tuberculosis. He lived a short twelve years, but was never well enough

to do more than a little incidental work. This tragedy was a deep,

personal loss to his young associate, for all through their St. George's

days they had been the closest of friends. They complemented one another

and made an ideal team.

Invariably on Good Friday in the course of his address on the Sixth Word

from The Cross, Frank Nelson spoke of Stein's influence upon him and

upon Christ Church: "The work he began is witnessed to by you who are

here. You wouldn't have been here forty years ago or the likes of you

would not have been here, but he opened the door of life and the spirit

to the people of this city, as to the members of this church. His work

goes on. The thing that God wanted him to do he did, and it was

finished." He expressed himself in more intimate fashion to his friend

Bishop Touret: "The heart of all its worth (Nelson's own forty years'

ministry) has been that I was carrying on for Alexis. I've first been

his assistant in my own mind always, and that has made it possible for

me to dare to undertake it." If Stein's work was finished, and a prophet

needs no great length of time, then it was brought to fruition through

the resolute efforts of this devoted servant who with great humility and

genuine searchings of heart took up the reins so tragically

relinquished.

Frank H. Nelson was elected Rector of Christ Church on May 5, 1900. In

the light of subsequent events his letter of acceptance is of interest:

May 16, 1900

Gentlemen:

In a letter from your Secretary, I have been informed of your

action of last Saturday, in electing me to succeed the Rev.

Alexis Stein, as Rector of Christ Church. That I appreciate very

deeply the honor that you have conferred upon me, I do not need

to say. I have considered the subject very carefully, and painful

to us all though the circumstances are that have led to this, I

feel strangely that it is God's work we have undertaken, and that

He has led us in it all. I therefore accept the call you have

given me, and I believe that working together we can, with God's

help, do a real work for Him in this city. For the success of the

work I regard two things as essential: the first that the Church

shall remain absolutely free, and the second that the lines of

work represented by the Parish House shall be continued. I ask

your cooperation and support in them both. I am writing the Rev.

J. H. Melish to ask him to be my associate. I hope to have him

begin his work with us in June. I feel deeply the burden of

responsibility, and the great opportunity that your call

involves. I can but say that I shall do all in my power to be

faithful to both.

Frank Nelson distrusted his own ability. Stein's preaching had packed

the church, and the numbers drastically declined when his eloquent voice

was stilled. The Bishop, conscious of the difficult problem confronting

a downtown church, advised Rev. Mr. Melish not to become associated,

saying "Stein could have solved it, but Frank Nelson never will." The

Bishop, however, had not sufficient evidence to gauge the young rector's

talents, nor could he foresee the capacity of the parish to respond to

the man's magnetic appeal.

There was at this time not only a break in the center of population in

the city, but also a shifting of the center of gravity in religion.

There was dawning a unity of the spirit which led men to break away from

the orthodox emphasis on creeds, and which strove to express itself in

many forms; such as parish houses, Christian associations, reforms, and

educational and missionary movements. Mr. Nelson's mind, being busy with

the stars, was concerned with the moral and spiritual movement which

outlasts the stars. He said, "To some of us it seems that Jesus was not

so much interested in establishing an institution as in revealing a new

quality of life." Likewise, Frank Nelson was not so much interested in

being the rector of a large, prosperous parish as in making the church

an agency for leavening the city's life with the spirit of Jesus Christ.

He caught the imagination of his people when he pointed to the

possibility of a church becoming the community center for multitudes in

the downtown district. In the near neighborhood of Christ Church were

new offices, factories, and boarding houses, and at the distance of one

block began the tenement houses where lived the poor and

underprivileged. He said:

We owe to them the gift of Christian friendship, of spiritual

influence irrespective of religious affiliations. The church

should provide not only a place to pray, but to play; a place not

only for worship, but for friendship. There are no places for

leisure except the streets, saloons, burlesque houses,

pool-rooms, public dance halls, or other commercial places of

entertainment. The Church is not here for its own sake. It is

here to bear witness, and to spread a spirit. It should be the

center from which radiate the forces of righteousness and the

spirit of brotherhood and every human activity and interest in

the community. Therefore, it must speak not to the individual

only, but to the business, social, and political problems,

dealing with them not from the viewpoint of the economist or

political theorist, but from that of the preacher of

righteousness. If Christ Church can be a force for righteousness

in the city, it matters but little whether it gain in numbers.[6]

"Distinction," it has been said, "is the emphasis put upon qualities by

circumstances." There were two circumstances which enabled this young

rector to create in Christ Church, Cincinnati a far-famed chapter in the

history of American churches and cities. One was his conception of the

place and function of the modern church in the new age, as just

outlined. It has been the reproach of the Protestant Churches that they

have too largely attracted only the well-to-do and middle classes. Frank

Nelson made Christ Church a place where rich and poor met on equal

footing. Drawn by his personality, both responded to his vision. There

was something about working in his parish that gave people a peculiar

zest and joy in living. There was, for instance, a Jewish lad in the

Sunday School, (Mr. Nelson never liked the term Church School) who after

his marriage came every Christmas to Christ Church with his wife and two

children. He proudly introduced them to Mr. Nelson, saying, "Though I am

a Jew, this is my church!"

On the other hand, Mr. Nelson's special gifts as a rector were developed

and brought into full flower in Christ Church because of the many

remarkable people who formed the backbone of his parish. In point of

numbers and in ability, they were an unusual group, a group

characterized by breadth of vision, and by a faith sufficient for them

to carry through the bold projects outlined by their leader. Many were

blessed with abundant means, and, above all, were filled with a

consummate loyalty and affection for their church. In this happy

partnership of pastor and parish, each inspired the other to great

accomplishment. The older members who were in the parish at the

beginning of Mr. Nelson's rectorship were vigorous, strong-minded people

accustomed to having their own way. They hewed to the old lines,

suspicious of change. With his deep sense of loyalty, Mr. Nelson felt

bound to maintain the sort of practices and low-church ceremony which

prevailed when he took over, but such was his adroitness, skill and tact

in leading them that he won their complete confidence and trust, and

they gave him an unreserved support as well as a free hand in many

things. This unbounded support of his early work he never forgot; nor

did he let his appreciation diminish with the success of later years. In

the course of the observances that marked his forty years as rector, he

said of them:

We found here, as the days went on, a group of people that I

think have never been equaled. Not a very large group of people,

but a group of people who gave us freedom--freedom to speak the

thing that was in our minds: to do the things that we believed

the Church ought to do and to stand for in the heart of a great

city.

A new parish house had been erected as Alexis Stein's rectorship closed,

and Mr. Nelson's organizing abilities made it hum. With the assistance

of the Rev. J. Howard Melish, the most competent of all his clerical

assistants, a Men's Club was organized, and became a mecca for the young

men of the city. For those of small means, it was the only sort of club

available, and was thrown open to every race and creed. In 1901 the

yearly attendance was 7,000, and by 1903 it had grown to 16,973. In line

with the policy of a community center, the Club included members of all

faiths, Jewish, Protestant, and Catholic. The Roman priest was always

notified of Catholics joining the club and informed that no proselyting

was intended, but rather that it was hoped these young men would become

better members of their own church. Athletic grounds were secured

together with a field-house, and Christ Church teams won an enviable

reputation for high standards of sportsmanship. Their spirit may be

judged by the story of a football player who waxed into colorful

profanity in the heat of a game and was bawled out by a Roman Catholic

teammate in terse words: "Don't you know who you represent?" During an

interim when another parish house was being built, Christ Church

basketball teams used the Holy Cross Monastery Hall for an entire year,

with the full approval of the Roman authorities and the gratitude of Mr.

Nelson. At that time, the captain of the Christ Church team, John M.

Cronin, was a prefect of the St. Xavier Sodality and also the secretary

of the Christ Church Men's Club. By 1911 it was necessary to limit the

Club's membership to six hundred, and there was always a long waiting

list. The social atmosphere, the entertainments, the athletic record,

the camp established by the church on the Miami River made this club one

of the most popular in the city. Mr. Nelson and Mr. Melish spent untold

hours in the work and gained an intimate knowledge of the individual

members and their views, particularly on labor questions. The men

expressed themselves freely, and at the close of an evening's discussion

Mr. Nelson would gather up the points of argument into a clear and

effective summary easily understood and remembered. It was in this club

that a small group once earnestly discussed how they might best help a

member when he should be released from a prison term which he was

serving. Nothing gratified the rector more than this sort of human

comradeship because it is the very essence of the Christian fellowship

which he was striving to implant.

As time went on, an increasing number of girls and young women entering

the business world created a social problem which weighed heavily on the

rector's mind and heart. Knowing the special conditions which these

young women must meet in a large city, he applied grave thought and much

energy to the study of their needs and to the opportunity which Christ

Church had in meeting them. Finding nothing for them socially in the

city except the Y.W.C.A., some distance away, he sent invitations to

department stores for a meeting at the parish house. At this meeting he

proposed to establish a branch of the Girls' Friendly Society which is

found throughout the Episcopal Church and which exists for social and

educational purposes. Mr. Nelson gave himself particularly to this

organization. He gathered a set of workers in the parish, women of

character and cultural background, who became the leaders and friends of

the various groups. He was a frequent visitor at meetings and often

conducted a question box. He encouraged the members to make it one of

their prime objectives to work for the city's interest. The rapid growth

of the Society enabled it to support a bed in the Children's Hospital,

to finance the Vacation House on the Ohio River, and to promote other

civic projects. The Christ Church organization became one of the largest

and most active branches in the national society, and had a succession

of remarkable directors, such as Deaconess Lloyd and Miss Alice Simrall.

Mr. Nelson's faith and incomparable friendship as well as his careful

planning made the Girls' Friendly a strong and useful force in

Cincinnati and an influence in the national body.

In those days the public schools provided nothing in the way of training

in the practical arts, and a large work along these lines was carried on

among the boys and girls who lived in the districts adjacent to Christ

Church. The Sewing School, for instance, grew in membership in three

years from twenty-four to over two hundred under unfavorable conditions

in the already cramped parish house. When the College Settlement on

Third Street closed, the church took over its kindergarten equipment and

its list of members, and every morning gathered in the children of

pre-school age.

When some people said it was a mistake to make a parish house a

community center, because in their minds it was being used only for

social purposes, Mr. Nelson's scorn was beautiful to hear. He asserted,

"The Church claims to be the Body of Christ, doesn't it? How did our

Lord regard His body? He used it freely with no thought of preserving

it, even to the final extent of hanging it upon a Cross. This is the

only way, His Way, that the Church will have eternal life."

Not many years passed before it became apparent that the parish house,

though not an old building, was literally worn out and was entirely

inadequate for such an extensive work. In 1907 Mr. Nelson announced the

gift of a new parish house from Mrs. Thomas J. Emery, a devoted member

of the church. So munificent a gift had rarely been equaled anywhere.

The six-story building, complete in every detail, was not finished until

1909. In it are club rooms, a large auditorium, a gymnasium, locker

rooms, and bowling alleys. At the corner next to the church rises a

beautiful clock tower which before the day of skyscrapers could be seen

from distant parts of the city, and which has been sketched by many

artists. Under the impetus of this gift the parish took on increased

vigor and extended the work into new fields. A Baby Clinic set up by the

Visiting Nurses' Association provided one more opportunity for service;

in 1910 the problem of crowded conditions in the nearby Guilford School

was solved by the use of Christ Church parish house for Kindergarten

and Domestic Science classes. It was a long list of services which gave

Christ Church and Mr. Nelson a far reaching reputation for efficient and

intelligent social service.

In the Parish House we meet each other, not as having the same

point of view, the same opportunities, but as having a common

humanity infinitely various in thought, in faith, in desire. Each

may learn from each, and grow in breadth and depth, and the

knowledge of God through his brother. It is in recognition of

this that we have a free church and free parish house. No

distinction of wealth may mar the worship in the one; no

distinction of faith may hinder the service in the other.[7]

The passing years brought fresh opportunities which were seized upon

with tireless energy by this far-seeing rector. In August, 1917 came the

opportunity to establish a Red Cross unit which through day and evening

groups enlisted the woman power of the parish. At the close of the war,

Mr. Nelson envisioned the continuance of this work on a scale far

exceeding the conventional idea of church missionary work. Tactfully

overcoming certain prejudices and narrow points of view, he again

secured the enthusiastic support of the same group of women. This unit

became one of the largest and most diligent organizations in the parish,

continuing the indispensable Red Cross work, and enlisting larger

numbers in the special program of the Woman's Auxiliary as it is

conducted in Episcopal parishes throughout the country.

Frank H. Nelson of Cincinnati · 第 1 / 8 段