THE CONTINENTAL 'BRADSHAW' IN 1852.

Bradshaw's _Continental Railway Guide_--the square, pale-yellow,

compact, brochure which makes its appearance once a month, and which

has doubled its thickness in its brief existence of five years--is

suggestive of a multitude of thoughts concerning the silent revolution

now passing over Europe. Presidents may have _coups d'état_; kings may

put down parliaments, and emperors abrogate constitutions; Legitimists

may dream of the past, and Communists of the future; but the

_railways_ are marking out a path for themselves in Europe which will

tend to obliterate, or at least to soften, the rugged social barriers

which separate nation from nation. This will not be effected all at

once, and many enthusiasts are disappointed that the cosmopolitanism

advances so slowly; but the result is not the less certain in being

slow.

Our facetious contemporary _Punch_ once gave a railway map of England,

in which the face of the land was covered with intersecting lines at

mutual distances of only a mile or two. A railway map of Europe has

certainly not yet assumed such a labyrinthine character; still, the

lines of civilisation (for so we may well term them) are becoming

closer and closer every year. The outposts of Europe, where the

Scandinavian, the Sclavonian, the Italian, and the Spaniard

respectively rule, are scanty in their exhibition of such lines; but

as we gradually approach the scenes of commercial activity, there do

railways appear in greater and greater proximity. France strikingly

exemplifies its own theory, that 'Paris is France,' by shewing how all

its important railways spring from the metropolis in six directions.

Belgium exhibits its compact net-work of railways, by which nearly all

its principal towns are accommodated. The phlegmatic Dutchman has as

yet placed the locomotive only in that portion of Holland which lies

between the Rhine and the Zuiderzee. Rhineland, from Bâle to

Wiesbaden, is under railway dominion. North Germany, within a circle

of which Magdeburg may be taken as a centre, is railed pretty thickly;

and Vienna has become a point from which lines of great length start.

Exterior to all these are solitary lines, the pioneers of the new

order of things, pointing in directions which will one day come within

the yellow covers of Bradshaw. There is one line straggling out to

Rostock; another to Stettin and Bromberg, on its way to Danzig;

another to Warsaw, on its way to meet the czar at St Petersburg;

another to Pesth, whence it will be carried through the scenes of the

late Hungarian war; another to the neighbourhood of the Adriatic;

others from Central Germany southward to the Swiss highlands, which

bar further progress; and a very modest little group in North Italy.

It is instructive to mark the steps by which these continental

railways have been brought into existence. The English practice of

undertaking all such great works, is very little understood abroad;

there is not capital enough afloat, and the commercial audacity of the

people has not yet arrived at such a high-pressure point. Almost the

whole of the railways now under notice, have been constructed either

by the governments of the respective countries, or by companies which

require some sort of government guarantee before they can obtain their

capital.

Belgium was the first continental country to follow the railway

example of England. Very soon after King Leopold was seated securely

on his throne, he initiated measures for the construction of railways

in Belgium; and a law was passed in 1834, sanctioning that compact

system which, having Mechlin as a centre, branches out in four

directions--to Liege, Antwerp, Brussels, and Ostend; and there were

also lines sanctioned to the Prussian frontier, and the French

frontier--the whole giving a length of about 247 English miles. Three

years afterwards, a law was passed for the construction of 94

additional miles of railway--to Courtrai, Tournay, Namur, and other

towns. In the western part of Belgium, the engineering difficulties

were not of a formidable character; but towards the Prussian frontier,

the bridges, cuttings, and embankments are so extensive, as to have

rendered the works far more costly than in the average of continental

railways. The Belgian Chambers provided the money, or rather

authorised the government to borrow it, year after year. The first

portion of railway was opened in 1835, and every year from thence till

1843, witnessed the opening of additional portions; until at length,

in this last-named year, all the 341 miles mentioned above were opened

for traffic. The cost varied from L.6140 per mile (near Courtrai), to

L.38,700 per mile (near Liege); the entire cost of the whole,

including working-plant, was within L.17,000 per average mile. While

these railways were progressing, private companies were formed for the

construction of other lines, to the extent of about 200 additional

miles, most of which are now open--the Namur and Liege being opened in

1851. These various railways are said to have yielded, on an average,

about 3-1/2 per cent. on the outlay.

It was of course impossible for France to see its little neighbour,

Belgium, advancing in its railway course, without setting a similar

movement on foot; but various circumstances have given a lingering

character to French railway enterprise. It was in 1837 that the short

railway from Paris through Versailles to St Germain--the first

passenger line in France--was opened. In the next following year, two

companies, aided by the government in certain ways, undertook the

construction of the railways from Paris to Rouen, and from Paris to

Orleans. The French government, having a strong taste for

centralisation in national matters, formed in 1842 that plan which has

since, with some modifications, been carried into execution. The plan

consisted in causing the great lines of communication to be surveyed

and marked out by government engineers, and then to be ceded to

joint-stock companies, to be constructed on certain conditions. There

were to be seven such lines radiating from Paris: to the Belgian

frontier; to one or more ports on the Channel; to the Atlantic ports;

to Bordeaux; to the Spanish frontier; to Marseille; and to Rhenish

Prussia. The government has had to concede more favourable conditions

to some of these companies than were at first intended, to get the

lines constructed at all. The first and second of the above lines of

communication are now almost fully opened; the third is finished to

Chartres; the fourth, to Nantes and Poitiers; the fifth, to

Chateauroux; the sixth, to Chalons, with another portion from Avignon

to Marseille; while the seventh, or Paris and Strasbourg Railway, is

that of which the final opening has been recently celebrated with so

much firing of guns, drinking of healths, blessing of locomotives, and

speechifyings of presidents. At the close of 1851, the length of

French railway opened was about 1800 miles; while the portion since

opened, or now in progress or projected, amounts to about as much

more. In the president's speech to the National Assembly in 1851 (of

course, _before_ the _coup d'état_), it was announced that the length

of French railway to be finished and opened in 1851 would be 516

kilomètres (about 320 miles); and in 1852, about 330 kilomètres (205

miles.)

Prussia loves centralisation little less than France in other matters;

but in railway enterprise she has allowed mercantile competition to

have freer scope. Private companies have constructed nearly all the

Prussian railways; but in cases where the traffic appeared likely to

be small, the government has rendered aid in one of three or four

modes. The government will not permit any parallel or competing lines;

and it holds the power of purchasing the railways after a lapse of

thirty years, on certain specified terms. On this principle have been

constructed the railways which radiate from Berlin in five different

directions--towards Hamburg, Hanover, Saxony, Silesia, and the Baltic;

together with minor branches springing out of them, and also the

railways which accommodate the rich Rhenish provinces belonging to

Prussia. The Prussian railways open and at work at the close of 1851

appear to have been about 1800 miles in length.

In the heterogeneous mass of states which constitute Germany, the

railways have for the most part been constructed by, and belong to,

the respective governments. Such is the case in Baden, Hanover,

Brunswick, Würtemberg, Bavaria, and many of the petty states; and such

is also the case in the imperial dominions in Austria, Hungary,

Bohemia, Moravia, and Styria. There may be some among these lines of

railway which belong to companies, but, as a general rule, they

constitute government property. If we include Prussia and the Austrian

dominions in the general name of Germany, we find the railways very

unequally distributed. An oblong quadrangular district, measuring

about 400 miles from east to west, and 200 from north to south, and

lying eastward of the Netherlands, contains a net-work of railways

which contrast remarkably with those of east, south, and central

Germany; it includes Hamburg, Berlin, Leipsic, Dresden, Magdeburg,

Brunswick, Hanover, Bremen, and a busy knot of other important towns.

Although the various German railways twist about in more tortuous

forms than those of England--for the engineers have studied economy by

going round hills rather than through them--and although they are

broken up into many different proprietorships by passing through so

many petty states, yet there may be traced certain great lines of

communication which run nearly or entirely across the whole of

Germany. Starting from Cologne, we find one line running through

Elberfeld, Minden, Hanover, Brunswick, Berlin, to Bromberg and Posen;

another from Cologne--with a short break not yet completed in

Westphalia--to Cassel, Gotha, Weimar, Leipsic, Dresden, Breslau, and

Cracow; a third from Hamburg, through Magdeburg, Leipsic, Dresden,

Prague, Presburg, and Pesth, into the heart of Hungary; a fourth from

the Baltic at Stettin, through Berlin, Leipsic, Nürnberg, Augsburg, to

the vicinity of the Lake of Constance; and a fifth from Warsaw,

through Vienna, to the vicinity of the Adriatic. Dr Lardner has

estimated, that if we include the Netherlands and the Austrian and

Prussian dominions within the German group, the German railways at the

beginning of 1851 were about 5100 miles in length, with 3000 miles

more either in progress or decided on--making a total of between 8000

and 9000 miles. Many hundred miles of railway have been opened since

the date to which this estimate refers.

Our Bradshaw leaves us little to notice on the continent beyond the

groups of railways included under the above four systems. The Dutch

have given a curious serpentine line of railway, about 150 miles in

length, from Rotterdam through Schiedam, Delft, The Hague, Leyden,

Haarlem, Amsterdam, and Utrecht, to Arnhem--an economical mode of

linking most of the chief towns together. Holstein, the recent field

of struggle between the Danes and the Germans, has its humble quota of

about 100 miles of railway, from Altona to Glückstadt, Rendsburg, and

Kiel, connecting the German Ocean with the Baltic in a very convenient

way. Russia has a railway in its Polish dominions from Warsaw to

Cracow; a short bit from St Petersburg to Tsarkoé-soélo; portions of

the projected great lines from St Petersburg to Moscow and to Warsaw,

and a horse railway connecting the Don with the Volga. Italy has a few

bits of railway--perhaps quite as much as we could yet expect in so

strangely governed a country; one from Venice through Padua, Vicenza,

and Verona, to Mantua; another from Treviglio to Milan, Monza, and

Como; a Piedmontese line from Genoa to Alessandria and Turin; a Tuscan

web which connects Florence, Sienna, Pistoja, Lucca, Pisa, and

Leghorn, in a roundabout way; and a few miles of Neapolitan railway,

to connect Naples with Pompeii, Portici, Castel-a-mare, and Capua.

Rome, behindhand in most things, is behindhand in railways.

Switzerland has its little railway of twenty-five miles, from Zurich

to Baden. Spain has its two small lines, from Madrid to Aranjuez, and

from Barcelona to Mataro. Turkey and Greece, in the south-east;

Portugal, in the south-west; Sweden and Norway,[1] in the bleak north,

have yet to become members of the great European railway system.

In comparing all these continental railways with those of our own

country, we find many instructive differences. In the first place, the

engineering, as we lately remarked, is much less daring; there is not

so much capital at command, and the engineers, therefore, bend to

difficulties instead of cutting through them. Still, there are not

wanting engineering works of great magnitude. One such is the great

railway bridge over the Vistula, near Bromberg, the first stone of

which was laid with much form by the king of Prussia some short time

back, and which will form one link in the chain from Berlin to

Königsberg. Another is the double railway bridge over the Elbe at

Dresden, opened in April 1852, having a railway on its eastern half,

and an ordinary roadway on its western. The stupendous Cologne Bridge

will be for the future to talk about: at present, not a single railway

bridge, we believe, crosses the Rhine; so that Western Europe is, in

fact, not yet connected by the iron pathway with Eastern. Among the

many thousand miles of continental railway, there must, of course, be

numerous constructions of great skill and magnitude; but the ratio is

small compared with those of England.

Another feature, is the great prevalence of single lines of rail. In

England, there is so much wrangling against single lines, and so great

a tendency among directors to think that there _ought_ to be traffic

enough for more, that double lines prevail almost everywhere. In the

German railways, double lines are laid down only in places of great

traffic--single lines being the rule, and the others the exception.

Where there are only three or four departures per day, which is the

case on most German railways, one line, with carefully-managed

sidings, is amply sufficient. 'Express trains,' and 'first-class

trains,' and 'special trains,' and anything which disturbs the steady

jog-trot mode of proceeding, are very little known in Germany; the

general speed, including stoppages, is about twenty miles an hour.

Although the first-class fares are only a fraction above 1-1/2d. per

mile, and the second-class just over 1d., yet the Germans travel so

cheaply, and mix among each other with so little exclusiveness, that

it is said only 3-1/2 per cent. of the whole number of passengers

travel by first-class, and 74 per cent. by third-class; the ratios in

England being 14 and 46 per cent. respectively. One apparent effect of

these very low fares is, that although the railways are for the most

part cheaply constructed, the net profits are not supposed to exceed 3

per cent. on an average; but if the fares were higher, perhaps the

number of passengers would be so reduced as to lessen the net profit.

Whatever else may be the superiority of English railways over those of

the continent, assuredly it is not apparent in the _carriages_. The

public press has made an onslaught on the English railway carriages

for twenty years, but with very little success. Let those whose bones

ache with the ill-conditioned wooden seats of our second-class

carriages, think wishfully of the cushioned seats, and the

easily-opened windows shielded with sun-blinds, and the useful

hat-hooks found in many of the French second-class carriages; let

those who shiver under English arrangements, think of the hot-water

tin cases beneath the feet of the first-class French passengers; and

let those who wish to be usefully employed while travelling, think of

the little table, and the pen and ink, provided in some of the

Prussian carriages. The truth is, we spend money on magnificent

stations which ought to be expended on carriages. The cramped-up

position of passengers on English railways is much reprobated by

foreigners. In America, and in many parts of the continent, it is

customary to have carriages long, broad, and high, with an avenue down

the middle, and short seats for two persons each on either side of the

avenue; every person looks towards the engine, and there is a

plentiful supply of window on both sides. In America, these short

seats are not only cushioned, but each seat has its two elbows and its

cushioned back.

Another English annoyance, is the _ticket-taking_. If all the wrath

which is poured out on the heads of the railway directors during this

formality could take effect, they would be among the most miserable

and unfortunate of mortals. Arrived at Euston Station, we will say, by

the last train from the north--some sleepy, some hungry, and all

tired--the passengers are anxious to wend their several ways as

quickly as possible; instead of this, the train is brought to a

stand-still, the man with his bull's-eye lantern pokes his head into

one doorway after another, and all are kept waiting until all the

tickets are collected. One passenger may have dropped his ticket, and

then comes a search among the hat-boxes and carpet-bags beneath the

seats; another may have underpaid his fare, or overridden the power of

his ticket, and then occurs the fuss of paying up the difference; a

third may be sleeping weariedly in the further corner of the carriage,

and then comes the process of waking him, followed, perhaps, by a

search for the ticket in an incalculable number of pockets. All this

is nicely ill-managed! The larger size of many of the continental

carriages, and the avenue through the centre, enable the ticket-taker

to enter the carriage easily while the train is yet in motion, and to

collect the tickets by the time of arrival at the station. On one of

the Austrian railways, the carriages have an exterior gangway

extending the whole length of the train, by which a guard can obtain

easy access to all the passengers: shortly before arriving at a

station, he enters the carriages, calls out the name of the station

about to be approached, and takes the tickets of those who are to

alight at that station. There is one oddity about the railway

management abroad. In England, a railway smoker commits a high crime

and misdemeanour, for which he is frowned at by his neighbours, and

threatened by the guard; but on the continent, not only do the

passengers smoke abundantly, but we were once rather struck at seeing

a ticket-taker enter the carriage with a meerschaum in his mouth; one

passenger, whose pipe was out, asked the customary German question:

'Haben sie feuer?' and the official gave him a light accordingly. We

believe, however, that there is a wish at head-quarters to keep down

this habit of smoking on the continental railways.

There are two sources of embarrassment which the Englishman is spared

in his own country, but which press upon him in full force while

travelling by rail abroad--namely, the different kinds of distance

measurement, and the different kinds of money employed. Accustomed to

English charges varying from three farthings to threepence per mile,

he is frequently thrown out of his reckoning by the absence of miles

abroad. The French kilomètre and the German meile are not English

miles; the former equals 1093 yards, and is therefore a troublesome

fraction of an English mile; while the German meile is as long as

about four and a half English miles.

But this, however, is a minor inconvenience; for our 'Continental

Bradshaw' gives most of the measurements in English miles. Not so in

respect to the current coinage abroad. Although there was a 'railway

congress' held a few years ago, to determine on a plan for

facilitating the intercourse between country and country, yet this

plan did not go so far as to assimilate the moneys of the different

states; the tourist speedily discovers that this is the case, and he

becomes perplexed with a multiplicity of cares. So long as he is in

France or Belgium, the _franc_ (9-1/2d.), with its multiples and

submultiples, are easily managed; but when he gets beyond the Rhine,

his troubles begin. If in Holland, he has to manage with the _guilder_

(1s. 8d.) and its fractional parts in _cents_. If in the neighbourhood

of Hamburg, he has to pay by means of the _mark_ (14-1/2d.), and

certain strange-looking _schillings_ or _skillings_, of which sixteen

equal one mark. Going south and east into Prussia, he finds the ruling

coin to be the _thaler_ (3s.), divisible into thirty _groschen_. and

each of these into twelve _pfennige_; but if he be hovering in

the frontiers of Prussia and Saxony, he will find that the

_neu-groschen_ of the latter country is worth a little more than the

_silber-groschen_ of the former, and that there is some difficulty in

getting rid of either in the country of the other. Getting further

south, to the regions belonging to or adjoining Austria, he will find

his thalers and groschen no longer welcome; he has to attend to the

_florin_ (2s.), and its divisions into sixty _kreutzers_. If he

travels north-east, to the few miles of railway yet existing in

Poland, he will have to pay in _rubles_ (3s. 3d.) and _kopecks_, which

rank at 100 to the ruble. On the little Zurich and Baden Railway, the

only one yet in Switzerland, our traveller meets again with his old

acquaintance the _franc_; but this is worth 14-1/2d., instead of

9-1/2d., and, moreover, it is divided into ten _batzen_, each of which

is worth ten _rappen_. If he crosses the Alps to Austrian Italy, he

finds that his fare is reckoned in Austrian _lire_ (about 8d.) In many

cases, the different states take money from _through_ passengers in

the coin of either country; but the traveller who makes frequent

stoppages, soon finds the embarrassment of the different moneys. A

railway has lately been completed from Dresden to Prague--the capitals

of the two kingdoms of Saxony and Bohemia--along the banks of the

Elbe; it is no great distance, and yet the fees north of the frontier

are charged in _thalers_ and _neu-groschen_, while those south of it

are in _florins_ and _kreutzers_.

There have been very busy and important railway enterprises agreed

upon or discussed within the last year or two, in various parts of the

continent, which augur favourably for the future of Europe. We shall

shortly pass these in review, to shew what may possibly be the aspect

presented by the 'Continental Bradshaw' in 1862.

Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 452 Volume 18, New Series, August 28, 1852 · 第 4 / 17 题