PSALM LXXXIII.

1 O God, let there be no rest to Thee,

Be not dumb, and keep not still, O God.

2 For, behold, Thy enemies make a tumult,

And they who hate Thee lift up the head.

3 Against Thy people they make a crafty plot,

And consult together against Thy hidden ones.

4 They say, Come, and let us cut them off from [being] a nation,

And let the name of Israel be remembered no more.

5 For they consult together with one heart,

Against Thee they make a league:

6 The tents of Edom and the Ishmaelites,

Moab and the Hagarenes,

7 Gebal and Ammon and Amalek,

Philistia with the dwellers in Tyre;

8 Asshur also has joined himself to them,

They have become an arm to the children of Lot. Selah.

9 Do Thou to them as [to] Midian,

As [to] Sisera, [to] Jabin at the brook Kishon,

10 [Who] were destroyed at Endor,

[Who] became manure for the land.

11 Make them, their nobles, like Oreb and like Zeeb,

And like Zebah and like Zalmunnah all their princes,

12 Who say, Let us take for a possession to ourselves

The habitations of God.

13 My God, make them like a whirl of dust,

Like stubble before the wind,

14 Like fire [that] burns [the] forest,

And like flame [that] scorches [the] mountains.

15 So pursue them with Thy storm,

And with Thy tempest strike them with panic.

16 Fill their face with dishonour,

That they may seek Thy name, Jehovah.

17 Let them be ashamed and panic-struck for ever,

And let them be abashed and perish;

18 And let them know that Thou, [even] Thy name, Jehovah, alone

Art the Most High over all the earth.

This psalm is a cry for help against a world in arms. The failure of

all attempts to point to a period when all the allies here represented

as confederate against Israel were or could have been united in

assailing it, inclines one to suppose that the enumeration of enemies

is not history, but poetic idealisation. The psalm would then be,

not the memorial of a fact, but the expression of the standing

relation between Israel and the outlying heathendom. The singer

masses together ancient and modern foes of diverse nationalities and

mutual animosities, and pictures them as burying their enmities and

bridging their separations, and all animated by one fell hatred to the

Dove of God, which sits innocent and helpless in the midst of them.

There are weighty objections to this view; but no other is free from

difficulties even more considerable. There are two theories which divide

the suffrages of commentators. The usual assignment of date is to the

league against Jehoshaphat recorded in 2 Chron. xx. But it is hard to

find that comparatively small local confederacy of three peoples in the

wide-reaching alliance described in the psalm. Chronicles enumerates the

members of the league as being the children of Moab and "the children

of Ammon, and with them some of the Ammonites," which last unmeaning

designation should be read, as in the LXX., "the Me'unim." and adds to

these Edom (2 Chron. xx. 2, corrected text). Even if the contention

of the advocates of this date for the psalm is admitted, and "the

Me'unim" are taken to include the Arab tribes, whom the psalmist calls

Ishmaelites and Hagarenes, there remains the fact that he names also

Philistia, Amalek, Tyre, and Asshur, none of whom is concerned in the

alliance against Jehoshaphat. It was, in fact, confined to eastern and

south-eastern nations, with whom distant western tribes could have no

common interest. Nor is the other view of the circumstances underlying

the psalm free from difficulty. It advocates a Maccabean date. In 1

Macc. v. it is recorded that the nations round about were enraged

at the restoration of the altar and dedication of the Temple after

its pollution by Antiochus Epiphanes, and were ready to break out in

hostility. Cheyne points to the occurrence in Maccabees of six of the

ten names mentioned in the psalm. But of the four not mentioned, two

are Amalek and Asshur, both of which had been blotted out of the roll

of nations long before the Maccabees' era. "The mention of Amalek,"

says Cheyne, "is half-Haggadic, half-antiquarian." But what should

Haggadic or antiquarian elements do in such a list? Asshur is explained

on this hypothesis as meaning Syria, which is very doubtful, and,

even if admitted, leaves unsolved the difficulty that the subordinate

place occupied by the nation in question would not correspond to the

importance of Syria in the time of the Maccabees. Of the two theories,

the second is the more probable, but neither is satisfactory; and

the view already stated, that the psalm does not refer to any actual

alliance, seems to the present writer the most probable. The world is

up in arms against God's people; and what weapon has Israel? Nothing but

prayer.

The psalm naturally falls into two parts, separated by Selah, of which

the first (vv. 1-8) describes Israel's extremity, and the second (vv.

9-18) is its supplication.

The psalmist begins with earnest invocation of God's help, beseeching

Him to break His apparent inactivity and silence. "Let there be no

rest to Thee" is like Isa. lxii. 6. God seems passive. It needs but

His Voice to break the dreary silence, and the foes will be scattered.

And there is strong reason for His intervention, for they are _His_

enemies, who riot and roar like the hoarse chafing of an angry sea,

for so the word rendered "make a tumult" implies (Psalm xlvi. 3). It

is "Thy people" who are the object of their crafty conspiracy, and it

is implied that these are thus hated because they _are_ God's people.

Israel's prerogative, which evokes the heathen's rage, is the ground

of Israel's confidence and the plea urged to God by it. Are we not Thy

"hidden ones"? And shall a hostile world be able to pluck us from our

safe hiding-place in the hollow of Thy hand? The idea of preciousness,

as well as that of protection, is included in the word. Men store

their treasures in secret places; God hides His treasures in the

"secret of His face," the "glorious privacy of light" inaccessible.

How vain are the plotters' whisperings against such a people!

The conspiracy has for its aim nothing short of blotting out the

national existence and the very name of Israel. It is therefore

high-handed opposition to God's counsel, and the confederacy is

against _Him_. The true antagonists are, not Israel and the world,

but God and the world. Calmness, courage, and confidence spring in

the heart with such thoughts. They who can feel that they are hid in

God may look out, as from a safe islet on the wildest seas, and fear

nothing. And all who will may hide in Him.

The enumeration of the confederates in vv. 6-8 groups together peoples

who probably were never really united for any common end. Hatred is

a very potent cement, and the most discordant elements may be fused

together in the fire of a common animosity. What a motley assemblage

is here! What could bring together in one company Ishmaelites and

Tyrians, Moab and Asshur? The first seven names in the list of allies

had their seats to the east and south-east of Palestine. Edom, Moab,

Ammon, and Amalek were ancestral foes, the last of which had been

destroyed in the time of Hezekiah (1 Chron. iv. 43). The mention of

descendants of Ishmael and Hagar, nomad Arab tribes to the south and

east, recalls their ancestors' expulsion from the patriarchal family.

Gebal is probably the mountainous region to the south of the Dead Sea.

Then the psalmist turns to the west, to Philistia, the ancient foe,

and Tyre, "the two peoples of the Mediterranean coast, which also

appear in Amos (ch. i.; _cf._ Joel iii.) as making common cause with

the Edomites against Israel" (Delitzsch). Asshur brings up the rear--a

strange post for it to occupy, to be reduced to be an auxiliary to the

"children of Lot," _i.e._ Moab and Ammon. The ideal character of this

muster-roll is supported by this singular inferiority of position, as

well as by the composition of the allied force, and by the allusion

to the shameful origin of the two leading peoples, which is the only

reference to Lot besides the narrative in Genesis.

The confederacy is formidable, but the psalmist does not enumerate

its members merely in order to emphasise Israel's danger. He is

contrasting this miscellaneous conglomeration of many peoples with

the Almighty One, against whom they are vainly banded. Faith can look

without a tremor on serried battalions of enemies, knowing that one

poor man, with God at his back, outnumbers them all. Let them come

from east and west, south and north, and close round Israel; God

alone is mightier than they. So, after a pause marked by Selah, in

which there is time to let the thought of the multitudinous enemies

sink into the soul, the psalm passes into prayer, which throbs with

confident assurance and anticipatory triumph. The singer recalls

ancient victories, and prays for their repetition. To him, as to

every devout man, to-day's exigencies are as sure of Divine help as

any yesterday's were, and what God has done is pledge and specimen of

what He is doing and will do. The battle is left to be waged by Him

alone. The psalmist does not seem to think of Israel's drawing sword,

but rather that it should stand still and see God fighting for it. The

victory of Gideon over Midian, to which Isaiah also refers as the very

type of complete conquest (Isa. ix. 3), is named first, but thronging

memories drive it out of the singer's mind for a moment, while he goes

back to the other crushing defeat of Jabin and Sisera at the hands of

Barak and Deborah (Judg. iv., v.). He adds a detail to the narrative

in Judges, when he localises the defeat at Endor, which lies on the

eastern edge of the great plain of Esdraelon. In ver. 11 he returns to

his first example of defeat--the slaughter of Midian by Gideon. Oreb

(raven) and Zeeb (wolf) were in command of the Midianites, and were

killed by the Ephraimites in the retreat. Zebah and Zalmunnah were

kings of Midian, and fell by Gideon's own hand (Judg. viii. 21). The

psalmist bases his prayer for such a dread fate for the foes on their

insolent purpose and sacrilegious purpose of making me dwellings (or,

possibly, the pastures) of God their own property. Not because the

land and its peaceful homes belonged to the suppliant and his nation,

but because they were God's, does he thus pray. The enemies had drawn

the sword; it was permissible to pray that they might fall by the

sword, or by some Divine intervention, since such was the only way of

defeating their God-insulting plans.

The psalm rises to high poetic fervour and imaginative beauty in the

terrible petitions of vv. 13-16. The word rendered "whirling dust" in

ver. 13 is somewhat doubtful. It literally means _a rolling thing_,

but what particular thing of the sort is difficult to determine. The

reference is perhaps to "spherical masses of dry weeds which course

over the plains." Thomson ("Land and Book," 1870, p. 563) suggests

the wild artichoke, which, when ripe, forms a globe of about a foot

in diameter. "In autumn the branches become dry and as light as a

feather, the parent stem breaks off at the ground, and the wind

carries these vegetable globes whithersoever it pleaseth. At the

proper season thousands of them come scudding over the plain, rolling,

leaping, bounding." So understood, the clause would form a complete

parallel with the next, which compares the fleeing foe to stubble,

not, of course, rooted, but loose and whirled before the wind. The

metaphor of ver. 14 is highly poetic, likening the flight of the foe

to the swift rush of a forest fire, which licks up (for so the word

rendered _scorches_ means) the woods on the hillsides, and leaves a

bare, blackened space. Still more terrible is the petition in ver. 15,

which asks that God Himself should chase the flying remnants, and

beat them down, helpless and panic-stricken, with storm and hurricane,

as He did the other confederacy of Canaanitish kings, when they fled

down the pass of Beth-Horon, and "Jehovah cast down great stones on

them from heaven" (Josh. x. 10, 11).

But there is a deeper desire in the psalmist's heart than the enemies'

destruction. He wishes that they should be turned into God's friends,

and he wishes for their chastisement as the means to that end. "That

they may seek Thy face, Jehovah," is the sum of his aspirations, as it

is the inmost meaning of God's punitive acts. The end of the judgment

of the world, which is continually going on by means of the history

of the world, is none other than what this psalmist contemplated as

the end of the defeat of that confederacy of God's enemies--that

rebels should seek His face, not in enforced submission, but with

true desire to sun themselves in its light, and with heart-felt

acknowledgment of His Name as supreme through all the earth. The

thought of God as standing alone in His majestic omnipotence, while

a world is vainly arrayed against Him, which we have traced in vv.

5-7, is prominent in the close of the psalm. The language of ver. 18

is somewhat broken, but its purport is plain, and its thought is all

the more impressive for the irregularity of construction. God alone

is the Most High. He is revealed to men by His Name. It stands alone,

as He in His nature does. The highest good of men is to know that

that sovereign Name is unique and high above all creatures, hostile

or obedient. Such knowledge is God's aim in punishment and blessing.

Its universal extension must be the deepest wish of all who have for

themselves learned how strong a fortress against a world in arms that

Name is; and their desires for the foes of God and themselves are not

in harmony with God's heart, nor with this psalmist's song, unless

they are, that His enemies may be led, by salutary defeat of their

enterprises and experience of the weight of God's hand, to bow, in

loving obedience, low before the Name which, whether they recognise

the fact or not, is high above an the earth.

The Expositor's Bible: The Psalms, Vol. 2 Psalms XXXIX.-LXXXIX. · 第 68 / 74 题