FOOTNOTES:

[75] I do not mean necessarily to imply inferiority of rank in

saying that this second class of painters have questionable

qualities. The greatest men have often many faults, and sometimes

their faults are a part of their greatness; but such men are not, of

course, to be looked upon by the student with absolute implicitness

of faith.

[76] Including, under this term, John Lewis, and William Hunt of the

Old Water-color, who, take him all in all, is the best painter of

still life, I believe, that ever existed.

[77] The order in which I place these masters does not in the least

imply superiority or inferiority. I wrote their names down as they

occurred to me; putting Rossetti's last because what I had to say of

him was connected with other subjects; and one or another will

appear to you great, or be found by you useful, according to the

kind of subjects you are studying.

[78] This is especially the case in the St. Cecily, Rossetti's first

illustration to the "Palace of Art," which would have been the best

in the book had it been well engraved. The whole work should be

taken up again, and done by line engraving, perfectly; and wholly

from Pre-Raphaelite designs, with which no other modern work can

bear the least comparison.

[79] The praise I have given incidentally to Flaxman's sculpture in

the "Seven Lamps," and elsewhere, refers wholly to his studies from

Nature, and simple groups in marble, which were always good and

interesting. Still, I have overrated him, even in this respect; and

it is generally to be remembered that, in speaking of artists whose

works I cannot be supposed to have specially studied, the errors I

fall into will always be on the side of praise. For, of course,

praise is most likely to be given when the thing praised is above

one's knowledge; and, therefore, as our knowledge increases, such

things may be found less praiseworthy than we thought. But blame can

only be justly given when the thing blamed is below one's level of

sight; and, practically, I never do blame anything until I have got

well past it, and am certain that there is demonstrable falsehood in

it. I believe, therefore, all my blame to be wholly trust-worthy,

having never yet had occasion to repent of one depreciatory word

that I have ever written, while I have often found that, with

respect to things I had not time to study closely, I was led too far

by sudden admiration, helped, perhaps, by peculiar associations, or

other deceptive accidents; and this the more, because I never care

to check an expression of delight, thinking the chances are, that,

even if mistaken, it will do more good than harm; but I weigh every

word of blame with scrupulous caution. I have sometimes erased a

strong passage of blame from second editions of my books; but this

was only when I found it offended the reader without convincing him,

never because I repented of it myself.

[80] Large line engravings, I mean, in which the lines, as such, are

conspicuous. Small vignettes in line are often beautiful in figures

no less than landscape; as, for instance, those from Stothard's

drawings in Rogers's Italy; and, therefore, I have just recommended

the vignettes to Tennyson to be done by line engraving.

[81] Chapman's, if not the original.

[82] Gary's or Cayley's, if not the original. I do not know which

are the best translations of Plato. Herodotus and Æschylus can only

be read in the original. It may seem strange that I name books like

these for "beginners:" but all the greatest books contain food for

all ages; and an intelligent and rightly bred youth or girl ought to

enjoy much, even in Plato, by the time they are fifteen or sixteen.

* * * * *

The Elements of Drawing, in Three Letters to Beginners · 第 69 / 71 题