CONCLUSIONS.

From a study of the cases of sympathectomy made by Jonnesco and others,

and from the observation of my own cases, I offer these conclusions:

1. Excision of the superior cervical ganglion is a most valuable

procedure in glaucoma.

2. It is of more value in glaucoma simplex than in inflammatory

glaucoma.

3. In inflammatory glaucoma, on which iridectomy has been done without

benefit, excision of the superior cervical ganglion should certainly be

tried.

4. In cases of absolute glaucoma with pain, sympathectomy is to be tried

before resorting to any operation on the eyeball.

5. In cases of simple optic-nerve atrophy, sympathectomy may possibly be

beneficial if done before vision is entirely lost.

6. In cases of exophthalmic goiter, which do not improve under hygienic

medicinal and electric treatment, excision of the cervical sympathetic

on both sides is to be advised.

7. In unilateral glaucoma excision of the sympathetic ganglion is to be

done only on the corresponding side.

8. In the hands of a careful operator, excision of the superior and

middle ganglia is a safe operation, but removal of the inferior ganglion

can be done safely only by the most skillful surgeons.

9. The postmastoid route is to be preferred in excision of any part, or

all of the cervical sympathetic.

10. The fact that glaucoma is improved by sympathectomy and the finding

of pathologic changes in the excised ganglia suggest the conclusion that

this affection is due either to a permanent irritation of the cervical

sympathetic, or to an irritation located elsewhere and transmitted by

means of the cervical sympathetic.

I wish to extend my thanks to Drs. E. C. Renaud and Willard Bartlett for

valuable assistance in the preparation of this paper; to Dr. Carl Fisch

for the pathologic report.

The Journal of Ophthalmology, Otology and Laryngology. Vol. XII. July, 1900. Part 3. · 第 53 / 64 题