ÆTIOLOGY.

Two views on the ætiology of this disease have been brought forward up

to the present time, as far as I know—viz., that the swellings were of a

racial character and that the process was started by the larva of some

insect. With regard to the first I have only to mention that the disease

is found in Ashantis, Grunshis, Fantees, Abantas, the Ga people, etc.,

races quite different from one another, to show that this cannot be

entertained. As to the second, I have never met with evidence which

would support the idea that the disease was started by a larva. On the

other hand there is always the history of yaws and of the tumor starting

during the attack of yaws—_i. e._, during the period of eruption or soon

after. Then, again, the patients complain of pain in the nose with, in

some cases, distinct history of a sore and sometimes discharge preceding

the swelling. This might be due to some irritation or ulceration of the

nasal mucous membrane by the yaws. I have never had the opportunity of

examining any person at this stage of the disease, but in the more

developed cases I have examined the nose for marks or signs of old

ulceration, but have not found them. If, however, the nasal process of

the superior maxilla be examined a few foramina are to be seen, and

these are often joined together by a small groove indicating the

position of a bygone suture. The foramina are for small bloodvessels,

which are said to communicate with those of the mucosa of the nose. The

site of these foramina is the situation where henpuye starts, and I

venture to bring forward the theory that the causation of this peculiar

disease is due to an osteoplastic periostitis brought about by the

absorption of the poison of yaws from the nasal mucous membrane through

the small vessels (or lymphatics) keeping open the foramina which

indicate the suture above mentioned.

The Journal of Ophthalmology, Otology and Laryngology. Vol. XII. July, 1900. Part 3. · 第 24 / 64 题