BY WM. WOODBURN, M. D., DES MOINES, IA.

I do not propose to treat this subject technically or theoretically,

further than to simply say, I consider the first a mild form of the

second, and both a reflex neurosis. I shall relate my experience and

treatment of some half dozen cases illustrating my subject.

CASE I.—Mrs. H., a farmer’s wife, æt. thirty-five, had been troubled

for a number of years with hay fever from harvest time until frost

came in the fall. Inspection of the nose in June, 1899, showed the

lower right and both middle turbinated bodies greatly hypertrophied.

Removal of the anterior and lower half of the middle and

cauterization of the lower, gave complete immunity for the entire

season. This patient could not, at any time, sweep the floor or ride

behind horses against the wind, without violent paroxysms of

sneezing, but since the operation has had no further trouble on this

score.

CASE II.—Mr. D., æt. about thirty-five, a traveling man, the patient

of our secretary, consulted me on August 28 last, in the midst of

his annual attack of hay fever. Examination showed the entire nasal

mucous membrane greatly engorged, as it always is during an attack.

On the right side of the septum, near the floor, was a sharp septal

spur, projecting at right angles about three-eighths of an inch,

prodding the tumefied lower turbinated body. The removal of this

spur under cocaine anæsthesia greatly modified the symptoms

immediately, but a grateful frost, following in a few days,

prevented an exact estimate of the benefit to be ascribed to the

removal of this offending appendage.

This year, however, will furnish opportunity to determine how

permanent the effect will be.

CASE III.—Wm. S., æt. four years, a great sufferer from asthma, at

times when having a slight cold, to which he was very prone, to such

an extent that he could not lie down for several days and nights.

Relief had been sought in the higher altitudes of the Rockies and a

residence of one year at Denver, but none came. I was consulted on

November 25, 1899. An examination showed the post-nasal space almost

occluded with adenoid vegetations. Of course I advised their

removal, which advice was accepted, and their thorough removal,

under the local application of cocaine, accomplished the purpose.

This was the child of a brother practitioner, and in April this year

I had a letter from the doctor, in which was the very gratifying

sentence, “William has not had the asthma since you removed his

adenoids, and is much better in every way.” This was especially

pleasing since his suffering had always been more severe and

constant during his previous winters.

CASE IV.—Male, æt. forty-five, Swede; occupation, bridge-builder.

Had suffered annually for fifteen years with, first, hay fever, and,

later in the season, asthma. In the summer of 1899 he anticipated

his attack by a trip to the mountains of Colorado, where he found

exemption and remained until the first frosts had appeared here, and

then ventured to return. Immediately on arriving at Omaha on his

return, his old antagonist met him and the battle again raged with

even renewed vigor. He consulted me a few days after his arrival

home, in a frame of mind ready to accept any suggestion which

promised him relief. I examined the nasal passages. The right lower

turbinated was greatly hypertrophied, and on the application of

cocaine, 3 per cent. solution, the tumefaction largely disappeared

and great immediate, but of course, temporary, relief was

experienced. On the left side an immense septal spur on the osseous

portion was found and removed. After the temporary swelling incident

to the operation had subsided, his relief was, and remains,

complete. I subsequently cauterized the enlarged right turbinated,

since which time, he informs me, he has breathed more freely than he

has done for fifteen years.

CASE V.—Lady, æt. about twenty-eight, married, had consulted all the

physicians in her home town, except the one she should have at first

consulted. Finally, in desperation she went to a young up-to-date

homeopathic physician, who looked into her nose and assured her he

knew what caused her trouble. He made an application of a solution

of cocaine, and in a few minutes her respiration became nasal and

normal. “Oh, what a relief! That is the first good breath I have had

for weeks,” was her exclamation. Both lower turbinated bodies were

immensely hypertrophied, and the doctor wisely advised their removal

and referred her to me to do the work. When I first saw the patient

she was a frail, pale, wan little woman, thoroughly exhausted. I saw

her about six weeks subsequently, in a remarkably improved

condition. Had gained about twenty pounds in weight and was plump,

rosy-cheeked, and had entirely lost her distressed appearance.

The last two cases both occurred in the practice of my good friend, Dr.

C. M. Harrington of Knoxville, Ia., and are all the more valuable

because he is here to corroborate the fair statement of the cases I have

made, and emphasize the beneficial results in a discussion of my paper.

CASE VI.—An old-school physician, æt. about thirty-five, had for a

number of years been troubled during the late summer months and

early fall with hay fever. Had sought relief from a number of

specialists in his own school of medicine as well as prominent

general practitioners. By chance he was directed to me, not knowing

my school of practice, in the midst of attack in 1899. No

satisfactory examination could be made until a 4 per cent. solution

of cocaine had been applied and caused a lessening of the

engorgement. There was plainly visible a large well-organized simple

polypus hanging by a distinct pedicle from the right middle

turbinated body. Its removal with the cold wire snare gave prompt

and permanent relief and made a lasting and loyal friend of my

old-school confrère.

In none of these cases do I mention any medication. None was used except

to cleanse the mucous membrane of the viscid secretion always present in

such conditions, and following such operations. All of the cases

reported were mechanical obstructions, and demanded mechanical

treatment, and no line of medicinal treatment would have done more than

temporary good.

The Journal of Ophthalmology, Otology and Laryngology. Vol. XII. July, 1900. Part 3. · 第 2 / 64 题