THE LONGING OF A MAN OF SCIENCE.

My first step, of course, was to find suitable apartments. These I

obtained, after a couple of days' search, in Fourth Avenue; a very

pretty second-floor unfurnished, containing sitting-room, bedroom,

and a smaller apartment which I intended to fit up as a laboratory. I

furnished my lodgings simply, but rather elegantly, and then devoted

all my energies to the adornment of the temple of my worship. I

visited Pike, the celebrated optician, and passed in review his

splendid collection of microscopes,--Field's Compound, Higham's,

Spencer's, Nachet's Binocular, (that founded on the principles of

the stereoscope,) and at length fixed upon that form known as

Spencer's Trunnion Microscope, as combining the greatest number of

improvements with an almost perfect freedom from tremor. Along with

this I purchased every possible accessory,--drawtubes, micrometers,

a _camera-lucida_, lever-stage, achromatic condensers, white cloud

illuminators, prisms, parabolic condensers, polarizing apparatus,

forceps, aquatic boxes, fishing-tubes, with a host of other articles,

all of which would have been useful in the hands of an experienced

microscopist, but, as I afterwards discovered, were not of the

slightest present value to me. It takes years of practice to know

how to use a complicated microscope. The optician looked

suspiciously at me as I made these wholesale purchases. He evidently

was uncertain whether to set me down as some scientific celebrity or

a madman. I think he inclined to the latter belief. I suppose I was

mad. Every great genius is mad upon the subject in which he is

greatest. The unsuccessful madman is disgraced, and called a lunatic.

Mad or not, I set myself to work with a zeal which few scientific

students have ever equalled. I had everything to learn relative to

the delicate study upon which I had embarked,--a study involving the

most earnest patience, the most rigid analytic powers, the steadiest

hand, the most untiring eye, the most refined and subtile

manipulation.

For a long time half my apparatus lay inactively on the shelves of

my laboratory, which was now most amply furnished with every

possible contrivance for facilitating my investigations. The fact was

that I did not know how to use some of my scientific accessories,--

never having been taught microscopies,--and those whose use I

understood theoretically were of little avail, until by practice I

could attain the necessary delicacy of handling. Still, such was the

fury of my ambition, such the untiring perseverance of my experiments,

that, difficult of credit as it may be, in the course of one year I

became theoretically and practically an accomplished microscopist.

During this period of my labors, in which I submitted specimens of

every substance that came under my observation to the action of my

lenses, I became a discoverer,--in a small way, it is true, for I

was very young, but still a discoverer. It was I who destroyed

Ehrenberg's theory that the _Volcox globator_ was an animal, and

proved that his "monads" with stomachs and eyes were merely phases

of the formation of a vegetable cell, and were, when they reached

their mature state, incapable of the act of conjugation, or any true

generative act, without which no organism rising to any stage of life

higher than vegetable can be said to be complete. It was I who

resolved the singular problem of rotation in the cells and hairs of

plants into ciliary attraction, in spite of the assertions of

Mr. Wenham and others, that my explanation was the result of an

optical illusion.

But notwithstanding these discoveries, laboriously and painfully

made as they were, I felt horribly dissatisfied. At every step I

found myself stopped by the imperfections of my instruments. Like

all active microscopists, I gave my imagination full play. Indeed,

it is a common complaint against many such, that they supply the

defects of their instruments with the creations of their brains. I

imagined depths beyond depths in Nature which the limited power of

my lenses prohibited me from exploring. I lay awake at night

constructing imaginary microscopes of immeasurable power, with which

I seemed to pierce through all the envelopes of matter down to its

original atom. How I cursed those imperfect mediums which necessity

through ignorance compelled me to use! How I longed to discover the

secret of some perfect lens whose magnifying power should be limited

only by the resolvability of the object, and which at the same time

should be free from spherical and chromatic aberrations, in short

from all the obstacles over which the poor microscopist finds

himself continually stumbling! I felt convinced that the simple

microscope, composed of a single lens of such vast yet perfect power,

was possible of construction. To attempt to bring the compound

microscope up to such a pitch would have been commencing at the

wrong end; this latter being simply a partially successful endeavor

to remedy those very defects of the simple instrument, which, if

conquered, would leave nothing to be desired.

It was in this mood of mind that I became a constructive microscopist.

After another year passed in this new pursuit, experimenting on

every imaginable substance,--glass, gems, flints, crystals,

artificial crystals formed of the alloy of various vitreous materials,--

in short, having constructed as many varieties of lenses as Argus

had eyes, I found myself precisely where I started, with nothing

gained save an extensive knowledge of glass-making. I was almost

dead with despair. My parents were surprised at my apparent want of

progress in my medical studies, (I had not attended one lecture

since my arrival in the city,) and the expenses of my mad pursuit

had been so great as to embarrass me very seriously.

I was in this frame of mind one day, experimenting in my laboratory

on a small diamond,--that stone, from its great refracting power,

having always occupied my attention more than any other,--when a

young Frenchman, who lived on the floor above me, and who was in the

habit of occasionally visiting me, entered the room.

I think that Jules Simon was a Jew. He had many traits of the Hebrew

character: a love of jewelry, of dress, and of good living. There

was something mysterious about him. He always had something to sell,

and yet went into excellent society. When I say sell, I should

perhaps have said peddle; for his operations were generally confined

to the disposal of single articles,--a picture, for instance, or a

rare carving in ivory, or a pair of duelling-pistols, or the dress

of a Mexican _caballero_. When I was first furnishing my rooms, he

paid me a visit, which ended in my purchasing an antique silver lamp,

which he assured me was a Cellini,--it was handsome enough even for

that,--and some other knick-knacks for my sitting-room. Why Simon

should pursue this petty trade I never could imagine. He apparently

had plenty of money, and had the _entrée_ of the best houses in the

city,--taking care, however, I suppose, to drive no bargains within

the enchanted circle of the Upper Ten. I came at length to the

conclusion that this peddling was but a mask to cover some greater

object, and even went so far as to believe my young acquaintance to

be implicated in the slave-trade. That, however, was none of my

affair.

On the present occasion, Simon entered my room in a state of

considerable excitement.

"_Ah! mon ami_!" he cried, before I could even offer him the

ordinary salutation, "it has occurred to me to be the witness of the

most astonishing things in the world. I promenade myself to the

house of Madame -----. How does the little animal--_le renard_--name

himself in the Latin?"

"Vulpes," I answered.

"Ah! yes, Vulpes. I promenade myself to the house of Madame Vulpes."

"The spirit medium?"

"Yes, the great medium. Great Heavens! what a woman! I write on a

slip of paper many of questions concerning affairs the most secret,--

affairs that conceal themselves in the abysses of my heart the most

profound; and behold! by example! what occurs? This devil of a woman

makes me replies the most truthful to all of them. She talks to me

of things that I do not love to talk of to myself. What am I to think?

I am fixed to the earth!"

"Am I to understand you, M. Simon, that this Mrs. Vulpes replied to

questions secretly written by you, which questions related to events

known only to yourself?"

"Ah! more than that, more than that," he answered, with an air of

some alarm. "She related to me things----But," he added, after a

pause, and suddenly changing his manner, "why occupy ourselves with

these follies? It was all the Biology, without doubt. It goes without

saying that it has not my credence.--But why are we here, _mon ami_?

It has occurred to me to discover the most beautiful thing as you

can imagine.--a vase with green lizards on it composed by the great

Bernard Palissy. It is in my apartment; let us mount. I go to show

it to you."

I followed Simon mechanically; but my thoughts were far from Palissy

and his enamelled ware, although I, like him, was seeking in the

dark after a great discovery. This casual mention of the spiritualist,

Madame Vulpes, set me on a new track. What if this spiritualism

should be really a great fact? What if, through communication with

subtiler organisms than my own, I could reach at a single bound the

goal, which perhaps a life of agonizing mental toil would never

enable me to attain?

While purchasing the Palissy vase from my friend Simon, I was

mentally arranging a visit to Madame Vulpes.

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 01, No. 03, January, 1858 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 48 / 65 题