We do not know that we may say that she was _rescued_ from this sort

of life by meeting with Mr. Charles Fulke Greville. He was not a mere

squire, but a gentleman and a connoisseur: he so loved beauty that

when he beheld Romney’s model he longed to possess it as he would

have longed to possess a Grecian statue. In this case the matter was

negotiable: she passed from the studio to the bower. Mr. Greville

discovered her mental powers as well as admired her material beauty,

and he was humane enough to do--what no human being had ever thought of

doing--educate her. It came of the latest, when the tares had choked

the wheat. She progressed, indeed, rapidly in all she studied, and in

music she attained a wonderful perfection: her voice, even in speaking,

was one to melt the heart: in singing it fairly carried it off by

magic. If vanity accompanied the possession of powers such as no one

has since possessed--not even our now silent Nightingale--her apology

is in her course of life, for much of which others were responsible.

This vanity reached its culmination one night at Ranelagh, when,

intoxicated by the remarks flung in her way like flowers as she passed,

she electrified the entire crowd by breaking forth into song, and,

by the exercise of her unequalled vocalisation, flung uncontrollable

ecstasy over the idle public of the place. ‘Mr. Greville’ (says Dr.

Pettigrew, in his interesting ‘Sketch of Lady Hamilton’) ‘had gone

farther than he intended, and became alarmed at her fondness for

admiration, and ventured to reproach her for her indiscretion. She

retired to her room, threw off the elegant attire in which she was

clothed, and, presenting herself before him in a plain cottage dress,

proposed to relieve him of her presence. This act, however, served

only the more securely to bind him in his chains, and a reconciliation

took place.’ It is reported that three children were the fruit of

this connection; but there is a letter from Nelson to Lady Hamilton

extant, which, if it does not prove the contrary, shows at least that

Nelson knew nothing of it--a not likely circumstance if the alleged

fact were one in reality. However this may be, Dr. Pettigrew adds, ‘In

the splendid misery in which she lived she hastened to call to her her

mother, to whom she was through life most affectionate and attentive.’

In 1789, the year of many sorrows, Mr. Greville found himself, by the

French Revolution and other accidents, a nearly ruined man. His uncle,

Sir William Hamilton, our minister at Naples, stepped in to relieve

him of many of his embarrassments--among them of the lady to whom

perhaps some of them might be traced. Dr. Pettigrew says:--‘It is only

charitable to suppose Sir William to have been ignorant of his nephew’s

connection with Emma, but there have not been wanting reports that the

condition of the engagement between Sir William and the lady was the

payment of the nephew’s debts.’ At this time Sir William was within a

year of threescore. He was neither the Pericles of his age, nor was

Emma quite the Aspasia; but when we remember the bond which bound the

great statesman and refined lover of refined art to the most beautiful

and most accomplished woman in Greece--when we remember that in his

home intellect and skill were almost deified--that to it her presence,

her powers, and even her virtues (for all were not wanting because one

was absent) gave its chiefest charm--that without her the war against

Samos would not have been a matter of history--that she inspired great

commanders, and that but for her, much eloquence would have been mute,

which, through her, fired Greece to deeds of noble daring--with these

memories about us, we say, there is much in the persons and lives of

Sir William Hamilton and his wife that reminds us of Pericles and

Aspasia, even down to the very circumstance that the great lawgiver

took the courtesan to wife after she had been his mistress.

Dr. Pettigrew thus describes Sir William himself:--

Sir William Hamilton was a native of Scotland, born in 1730, and

was Minister at Naples for the long period of thirty-six years.

He was a distinguished antiquary, remarkable for his taste in,

and appreciation of, the fine arts. He possessed also scientific

acquirements, and had some knowledge of mineralogy: he was a

Trustee of the British Museum, Fellow of the Royal Society, and

a Vice-President of the Society of Antiquaries: he was also a

distinguished member of the Dillettanti Club, and appears among

their portraits in their meeting-room at the Thatched House

Tavern. A portrait of him, by Sir Joshua Reynolds, one of his

intimate friends, may be seen in the National Gallery. He is known

as an author by his works. With the King of Naples he was a great

favourite, and largely shared with him the enjoyment of the chase

and other sports, to which the sovereign is well known to have

been egregiously addicted.

Such was the sexagenarian philosopher. At this period the Aspasia

of his affections, if we may indeed use such a word, was just

five-and-twenty. She is thus limned by her biographer:--

Already familiarised to the studies of the painter, and, according

to Romney and his biographer, no mean judge of the arts, with

Sir William she had in Italy many opportunities of enjoying her

taste, of improving herself, and also of imparting knowledge.

This she is said to have practically evinced; for with a common

piece of stuff she could so arrange it and clothe herself as

to offer the most appropriate representations of a Jewess, a

Roman matron, a Helen, Penelope, or Aspasia. No character seemed

foreign to her, and the grace she was in the habit of displaying

under such representations excited the admiration of all who

were fortunate enough to have been present on such occasions.

The celebrated ‘Shawl Dance’ owes its origin to her invention;

but it is admitted to have been executed by her with a grace and

elegance far surpassing that with which it has ever been rendered

on the stage of any of our theatres. Under the tuition and

government of Sir William she improved so greatly, and obtained

such complete sway over him, that he resolved upon making her

his wife. They came to England, and on September 6, 1791, she,

writing the name of Emma Harte (an assumed name under which she

had long been known), he married her at the Church of St. George,

Hanover Square, resolving to return with her to Naples that she

might there be recognised by the Neapolitan Court. But prior to

quitting London to return to Naples she was doomed to experience

disappointment; for although she had, through the position of Sir

William Hamilton and his high connections, together with her own

attractions and accomplishments, gained admission into a very high

circle of society, she was very properly refused admission into

the Court of St. James’s, which Sir William in vain endeavoured

most assiduously to effect. In the society, however, in which she

now moved, she became distinguished for her great accomplishments;

and the dulness of fashionable life was greatly relieved by her

displays as a singer and as an actress. The admiration she excited

was universal. It is said that at first, upon the return of Sir

William Hamilton to Naples, there was some difficulty in the way

of her introduction to the Queen, not having been received at the

Court of her own country; that, however, was soon removed, and in

a short time she maintained the confidential intercourse with her

Majesty. That the Queen of Naples should have become intimately

attached to Lady Hamilton cannot be a matter of surprise when we

recollect the calamities her family had sustained by the French

Revolution. To seek consolation in the bosom of the wife of the

English Minister--the Minister of that country which almost stood

alone in its opposition to the principles and conduct of the

French Revolution--seems natural. Friendship is often created

by sympathetic associations called forth under the pressure of

affliction, and is sustained by the consolations of hope derived

from them. There are many letters in my possession from the

Queen of Naples to the Lady Hamilton breathing the most ardent

attachment, the most unbounded friendship, and expressing eternal

gratitude to her.

It was in the year 1793 that Nelson first saw this dangerous beauty.

From the period of her arrival up to this time, she appears to have

been the only source of joy and admiration to the Neapolitan Court.

The Duke of Sussex retained to the last lively recollections of her

charms, and of the effect she produced when singing with the famous

Mrs. Billington. In the eventful year last named Nelson landed at

Naples with despatches from Lord Hood. Sir William, as we have said,

on returning home after his interview with Nelson, told Lady Hamilton

that he was about to introduce to her a little man who could not boast

of being very handsome, but who would be the greatest man that England

ever produced. ‘I know it’ (said Sir William) ‘from the very few

words of conversation I have already had with him. I pronounce’ (said

the Minister) ‘that he will one day astonish the world. I have never

entertained any officer in my house, but I am determined to bring him

here: let him be put in the room prepared for Prince Augustus.’ Nelson

is stated to have been equally impressed with Sir William Hamilton’s

merits. ‘You are’ (he said) ‘a man after my own heart: you do business

in my own way. I am now only captain; but, if I live, I will be

at the top of the tree.’ The impression produced upon him by Lady

Hamilton, and her kindness towards the son of Nelson’s’ wife by her

first marriage, he thus simply describes in one of his letters:--‘Lady

Hamilton has been wonderfully kind and good to Josiah. She is a young

woman of amiable manners, and who does honour to the station to which

she is raised.’

The early attachment entertained by the Queen of Naples for Lady

Hamilton admits of ready and natural explanation. Sir William after his

marriage conducted his young bride to Naples by way of Paris, where she

was received by the ill-fated Marie-Antoinette. This unhappy queen was

sister to the Queen of Naples; and to Lady Hamilton she entrusted the

last letter she ever wrote to her scarcely less unhappy relative. The

wife of the British Minister became at once the personal friend of the

Neapolitan Queen, and her influence so great that the King himself said

of her that she had de-Bourbonised them and made them all English. It

was from this period that her patriotic mission commenced--a mission

which she carried out regardless of personal expense or personal peril,

and for the performance of which, though so great in its results, she

obtained slight acknowledgment and no recompense.

It was for no individual, but for her country solely, that she

exercised her unbounded influence when at Naples. Sir John Jervis named

her the ‘patroness of the navy;’ and when he was engaged upon the

reduction of Corsica he depended upon Lady Hamilton for despatching

to him all the necessaries he required from Naples: he subsequently

confessed that the reduction of the island was facilitated and

expedited by her aid and energy. At a time when British interests were

at stake and nearly all Europe was engaged in destroying them, she was

unceasingly wakeful to maintain and strengthen them. We had about this

time a most uncertain ally in Spain. It came to the knowledge of Lady

Hamilton that a Spanish courier had arrived at Naples with a letter

for the King: she forthwith repaired to the Queen, and so exercised

the power she possessed over even the powerful mind of that Sovereign

that she induced her to repair to the King’s cabinet and abstract

the important document from the monarch’s possession. The letter was

obtained: it was from the King of Spain himself, and it announced his

determination to break up his old alliance and to unite with France

against England. Sir William Hamilton was sick and incapable of action;

but ‘our General’s wife was now the General;’ and she further prevailed

on the Queen to allow her to take a copy of the document. This copy

she transmitted by a secure but costly method to Lord Grenville. To

effect its safe arrival cost her out of her own private purse not less

than four hundred pounds sterling. She was hardly thanked and was never

remunerated.

But ingratitude did not render her patriotism weary or unwilling: year

after year the British flag in the Mediterranean was indebted to her

for triumphs which it achieved, because without her aid the English

could not have profited even by opportunity. It must be remembered,

too, as Dr. Pettigrew justly remarks, ‘that at this period so high were

French ascendency and revolutionary principles in Naples that it was

absolutely dangerous for the British Minister to go to court.’

Her greatest service, though not her last, remains to be mentioned. It

is of that importance that it merits being mentioned in detail, and

the details are so clearly and concisely told by Dr. Pettigrew that

we cannot do better than adopt them. Never was service more greatly

needed: its having been rendered saved England, changed the aspect of

European politics, and gave to Lady Hamilton a branch of the showers of

laurel that fell to the victors at the Nile:--

In June, 1798, about three days after the French fleet had passed

by for Malta, Sir William and Lady Hamilton were awakened one

morning about six o’clock by the arrival of Captain Trowbridge

with a letter from Sir Horatio Nelson, then with the fleet lying

off the bay near to Capri, ‘requesting that the ambassador would

procure him permission to enter with his fleet into Naples or

any of the Sicilian ports to provision, water, &c., as otherwise

he must run for Gibraltar, being in urgent want; and that,

consequently, he would be obliged to give up all further pursuit

of the French fleet which he had missed at Egypt on account of

their having put into Malta.’ At this time Naples had made peace

with France, and an ambassador was resident then at Naples. One

of the stipulations of the treaty which had been entered into was

to the effect that _no more than two English ships of war should

enter into any of the Neapolitan or Sicilian ports_. However,

Sir William Hamilton called up Sir John Acton, the Minister, who

immediately convened a council at which the King was present. This

was about half-past six. Lady Hamilton went immediately to the

Queen, who received her in her bed-room: she represented to her

Majesty that the safety of the two Sicilies now depended upon her

conduct, and that should the council, as she feared that under the

circumstances they must do, decide on negative or half measures,

the Sicilies must be lost if Nelson were not supplied agreeably

to his request, by which he would be enabled to follow the great

French force which had passed in that direction only a few days

before. Nothing could exceed the alarm with which the Queen

received this intelligence: she urged that the King was in council

and would decide with his Ministers. Lady Hamilton dictated, and

the Queen wrote a positive order, ‘directed to all governors of

the two Sicilies to receive with hospitality the British fleet to

water, victual, and aid them.’ In every way this order, as Lady

Hamilton well knew, would be more respected than that which might

emanate from the King. The council did not break up until eight

o’clock, and Lady Hamilton attended Captain Trowbridge and her

husband to their residence! The faces of the King, of Acton, and

Sir William too plainly told the determination at which they had

arrived, and that _they could not then break with France_. On the

way home Lady Hamilton told Sir William and Captain Trowbridge

that she had anticipated the result and provided against it;

that, whilst they were in council debating on the application,

she had been with the Queen and had not without effect implored

her Majesty to render the aid required: she then, to his great

astonishment and delight, produced the order in question. Nothing

could exceed the gladness this occasioned. Trowbridge declared

that it would ‘cheer Nelson to ecstasy;’ and that by this means

they should be enabled to pursue and conquer the French fleet,

otherwise they must have gone for Gibraltar. Sir William Hamilton

wrote to Sir Horatio Nelson, communicating to him the formal

decision of the council; but added, ‘You will receive from Emma

herself what will do the business and procure all your wants.’

Lady Hamilton enclosed to the admiral the order, praying him ‘that

the Queen might be as little committed in the use of it as the

glory and service of the country would admit of.’ To this Nelson

replied that he received the precious order, and that if he gained

the battle it should be called hers and the Queen’s; for to Lady

Hamilton he should owe his success, as without the order their

return to Gibraltar was decided upon; but, he added, ‘I will now

come back to you crowned with laurels or covered with cypress.’

It was more especially for this service rendered when he was in his

utmost need that Nelson, while dying, recommended Lady Hamilton to

the memory and gratitude of his country. The effect of this service

we need not repeat. The British ships watered and victualled at

Syracuse, spread their huge wings in pursuit of their foe, and at

the Nile launched their heavy thunder to his destruction. On the

20th of September the triumphant squadron arrived at Naples, where

ships, officers, and men found every want supplied and every wish

anticipated. ‘But especially’ (says Dr. Pettigrew) ‘were the broken

health and wounded body of the valorous chief regarded. Nelson was

taken into the British Minister’s house, and there personally tended by

her whose sympathies had been so awakened, and by whose attentions he

was after a time restored to health.’ Her services did not terminate

here. While all at Naples were at the very high top-gallant of their

joy, Lady Hamilton induced the court to break altogether with the

French. The ambassador of the Republic was consequently dismissed with

scanty courtesy and in considerable haste. When, at a later period,

a French army marched on Naples itself and the royal family were

reduced to fly to Palermo, the chief arrangements for the safety of

the lives and properties of others were made or carried out by Lady

Hamilton: she privately removed from the palace the royal jewels and

thirty-six barrels of gold. These were marked ‘Stores for Nelson,’ and

under that device were safely shipped. Indeed, it was not till the

treasure was secured that the King consented to embark. In a despatch

to the Admiralty Lord Nelson says, ‘Lady Hamilton seemed to be an

angel dropped from heaven for the preservation of the royal family.’

To effect that preservation she was regardless of her own. On the

night in which she personally assisted the King, Queen, and children

to escape, she attended a party given by Kelim Effendi: she withdrew

from this party on foot, leaving her equipage in front of the house,

hastened to the place of meeting, conducted the royal family by a

subterranean passage to Nelson’s boat waiting to receive them, embarked

with the fugitives, and with them went before the storm that blew them

to Palermo. To accomplish this Sir William and his wife voluntarily

abandoned their entire possessions in their house at Naples: they did

not convey away one single article. The whole of their private property

was thus left behind in order to prevent discovery of their proceedings

in behalf of the royal family. The value of Lady Hamilton’s portion

thus abandoned amounted to 9,000_l._; not less than 30,000_l._’s worth

of property was sacrificed which belonged to Sir William. The virtue of

this sacrifice was the sole reward gained by those who made it.

It was in this year (1799) that Sir Alexander Ball, who held a part of

Malta, the French occupying another part, sent despatches to Nelson

at Palermo for provisions, without which he would be compelled to

surrender. Nelson was absent at his old occupation looking after the

enemies of England. Lady Hamilton opened the despatches, purchased

several entire cargoes of corn at her own risk, and forwarded them to

the half-starved English in Malta. She expended 5,000_l._, of which

not one shilling was ever returned to her. All that she profited

thereby was in receiving the order of St. John of Jerusalem from the

Emperor Paul, Grand Master of the Knights. England owed her much and

acknowledged nothing. The Queen of Naples acted with more generosity:

she put into the hands of Lady Hamilton, on parting from her

subsequently at Vienna, a conveyance of 1,000_l._ per annum; but the

latter magnanimously destroyed the deed, remarking that ‘England was

just, and to her faithful servants generous, and that she should feel

it unbecoming to her own beloved and magnanimous Sovereign to accept of

meed or reward from any other hand.’

In and About Drury Lane, and Other Papers, Vol. 2 (of 2) Reprinted from the pages of the 'Temple Bar' Magazine · 第 14 / 19 段