CHAPTER LXXXVII.

ASTROLOGY. ALMANACKS. PRISCILLIANISM RETAINED IN THEM TO THIS TIME.

I wander 'twixt the poles

And heavenly hinges, 'mongst eccentricals,

Centers, concentricks, circles and epicycles.

ALBUMAZAR.

The connection between astrology and the art of medicine is not more

firmly believed in Persia at this day, than it was among the English

people during the age of almanack-makers. The column which contained

the names of the saints for every day, as fully as they are still

given in Roman Catholic almanacks, was less frequently consulted than

those in which the aspects were set down, and the signs and the parts

of the human body under their respective governance. Nor was any page

in the book regarded with more implicit belief than that which

represented the “Anatomy of Man's body as the parts thereof are

governed by the twelve Constellations, or rather by the Moon as she

passeth by them.” In those representations man indeed was not more

uglily than fearfully made,—as he stood erect and naked, spiculated by

emitted influences from the said signs, like another St. Sebastian; or

as he sate upon the globe placed like a butt for him, while they

radiated their shafts of disease and pain.

Portentous as the Homo in the almanack is, he made a much more

horrific appearance in the Margarita Philosophica which is a

Cyclopedia of the early part of the 16th century. There Homo stands,

naked but not ashamed, upon the two Pisces, one foot upon each, the

Fish being neither in air, nor water, nor upon earth, but

self-suspended as it appears in the void. Aries has alighted with two

feet on Homo's head, and has sent a shaft through the forehead into

his brain. Taurus has quietly seated himself across his neck. The

Gemini are riding astride a little below his right shoulder. The whole

trunk is laid open, as if part of the old accursed punishment for high

treason had been performed upon him. The Lion occupies the thorax as

his proper domain, and the Crab is in possession of the abdomen.

Sagittarius, volant in the void, has just let fly an arrow, which is

on the way to his right arm. Capricornius breathes out a visible

influence that penetrates both knees; Aquarius inflicts similar

punctures upon both legs. Virgo fishes as it were at his intestines;

Libra at the part affected by schoolmasters in their anger; and

Scorpio takes the wickedest aim of all.

The progress of useful knowledge has in our own days at last banished

this man from the almanack; at least from all annuals of that

description that carry with them any appearance of respectability. If

it has put an end to this gross superstition, it has done more than

the Pope could do fourteen centuries ago, when he condemned it, as one

of the pernicious errors of the Priscillianists.

In a letter to Turribius, Bishop of Astorga, concerning that heresy,

Pope St. Leo the Great says: “_Si universæ hæreses, quæ ante

Priscilliani tempus exortæ sunt, diligentius retractentur, nullus pene

invenitur error de quo non traxerit impietas ista contagium: quæ non

contenta eorum recipere falsitates, qui ab Evangelio Christi sub

Christi nomine deviarunt, tenebris se etiam paganitatis immersit, ut

per magicarum artium prophana secreta, et mathematicorum vana

mendacia, religionis fidem, morumque rationem in potestate dæmonum, et

in affectu syderum collocarent. Quod si et credi liceat et doceri, nec

virtutibus præmium, nec vitiis pœna debebitur, omniaque non solum

humanarum legum, sed etiam divinarum constitutionum decreta solventur:

quia neque de bonis, neque de malis actibus ullum poterit esse

judicium, si in utramque partem fatalis necessitas motum mentis

impellit, et quicquid ab hominibus agitur, non est hominum, sed

astrorum. Ad hanc insaniam pertinet prodigiosa illa totius humani

corporis per duodecim Cœli signa distinctio, ut diversis partibus

diversæ præsideant potestates; et creatura, quam Deus ad imaginem suam

fecit, in tantâ sit obligatione syderum, in quantâ est connectione

membrorum._”

But invention has been as rare among heretics as among poets. The

architect of the Priscillian heresy (the male heresy of that name, for

there was a female one also) borrowed this superstition from the

mathematicians,—as the Romans called the astrological impostors of

those times. For this there is the direct testimony of Saint

Augustine: _Astruunt etiam fatalibus stellis homines colligatos,

ipsumque corpus nostrum secundum duodecim signa cœli esse compositum;

sicut hi qui Mathematici vulgo appellantur, constituentes in capite

Arietem, Taurum in cervice, Geminos in humeris, Cancrum in pectore, et

cetera nominatim signa percurrentes ad plantas usque perveniunt, quas

Piscibus tribuunt, quod ultimum signum ab Astrologis nuncupatar._

These impostors derived this part of their craft from Egypt, where

every month was supposed to be under the care of three Decans or

Directors, for the import of the word must be found in the

neighbouring language of the Hebrews and Syrians. There were

thirty-six of these, each superintending ten days; and these Decans

were believed to exercise the most extensive influence over the human

frame. Astrological squares calculated upon this mythology are still

in existence. St. Jerome called it the opprobrium of Egypt.

The medical superstition derived from this remote antiquity has

continued down to the present generation in the English almanacks, is

still continued in the popular almanacks of other countries, and

prevails at this time throughout the whole Mahommedan and Eastern

world. So deeply does error strike its roots, and so widely scatter

its seeds; and so difficult is it to extirpate any error whatsoever,

or any evil, which it is the interest of any class of men to maintain.

And the rogues had much to say for themselves.

“Notwithstanding the abuses put upon the art of Astrology,” said an

eminent Professor, “doubtless some judgement may be made thereby what

any native may be by nature prone or addicted to. For the aspects of

the Planets among themselves, as also the Fixed Stars, 'tis more than

supposed, may cause many strange effects in sublunary bodies, but

especially in those that have been almost worn out with decrepit age,

or debilitated with violent or tedious diseases; wherefore this

knowledge may be requisite, and of excellent use to physicians and

chirurgeons, &c. for old aches and most diseases do vary according to

the change of the air and weather, and that proceeds from the motion

of the heavens and aspects of the planets.”—Who that has any old aches

in his bones,—or has felt his corns shoot—but must acknowledge the

truth that was brought forward here in support of an impudent system

of imposture? The natural pride, and the natural piety of man, were

both appealed to when he was told that the stars were appointed for

signs and tokens,—that “the reason why God hath given him an upright

countenance is, that he might converse with the celestial bodies,

which are placed for his service as so many diamonds in an azure

canopy of perpetuity,”—and that astrologers had a large field to walk

in, for “all the productions of Time were the subjects of their

science, and there is nothing under the Sun but what is the birth of

Time.” There is no truth however pure, and however sacred, upon which

falsehood cannot fasten, and engraft itself therein.

Laurence Humphrey, who was sufficiently known in Queen Elizabeth's

days as one of the standard-bearers of the non-conformists, but who,

like many others, grew conformable in the end as he grew riper in

experience and sager in judgement,—in his Optimates or Treatise

concerning Nobility, which he composed for the use of that class and

of the Gentry, observed how “this science above all others was so

snatched at, so beloved, and even devoured by most persons of honour

and worship, that they needed no excitement to it, but rather a

bridle; no trumpeter to set them on, but a reprover to take them off

from their heat. Many,” he said, “had so trusted to it, that they

almost distrusted God.” He would not indeed wholly condemn the art,

but the nobility should not have him a persuader nor an applauder of

it; for there were already enough! In vain might a Bishop warn his

hearers from the pulpit and from the press that “no soothsayer, no

palterer, no judicial astrologer is able to tell any man the events of

his life.” Man is a dupeable animal. Quacks in medicine, quacks in

religion, and quacks in politics know this, and act upon that

knowledge. There is scarcely any one who may not, like a trout, be

taken by tickling.

The doctor, &c., vol. 3 (of 7) · 第 10 / 28 章