CHAPTER LXXX.

OBSERVATIONS WHICH SHEW THAT WHATEVER PRIDE MEN MAY TAKE IN THE

APPELLATIONS THEY ACQUIRE IN THEIR PROGRESS THROUGH THE WORLD, THEIR

DEAREST NAME DIES BEFORE THEM.

——Thus they who reach

Grey hairs, die piecemeal.

SOUTHEY.

The name of Leonard must now be dropt as we proceed. Some of the

South-American tribes, among whom the Jesuits laboured with such

exemplary zeal, and who take their personal appellations, (as most

names were originally derived,) from beasts, birds, plants and other

visible objects, abolish upon the death of every individual the name

by which he was called, and invent another for the thing from which it

was taken, so that their language, owing to this curiously

inconvenient custom, is in a state of continual change. An abolition

almost as complete with regard to the person had taken place in the

present instance. The name, Leonard, was consecrated to him by all his

dearest and fondest recollections. He had been known by it on his

mother's knees, and in the humble cottage of that aunt who had been to

him a second mother; and by the wife of his bosom, his first, last,

and only love. Margaret had never spoken to him, never thought of him,

by any other name. From the hour of her death no human voice ever

addressed him by it again. He never heard himself so called, except in

dreams. It existed only in the dead letter; he signed it mechanically

in the course of business, but it had ceased to be a living name.

Men willingly prefix a handle to their names, and tack on to them any

two or more honorary letters of the alphabet as a tail; they drop

their surnames for a dignity, and change them for an estate or a

title. They are pleased to be Doctor'd and Professor'd; to be

Captain'd, Major'd, Colonel'd, General'd, or Admiral'd;—to be Sir

John'd, my-Lorded, or your-Graced. “You and I,” says Cranmer in his

Answer to Gardiner's book upon Transubstantiation—“you and I were

delivered from our surnames when we were consecrated Bishops; sithence

which time we have so commonly been used of all men to be called

Bishops, you of Winchester, and I of Canterbury, that the most part of

the people know not that your name is Gardiner, and mine Cranmer. And

I pray God, that we being called to the name of Lords, have not

forgotten our own baser estates, that once we were simple squires!”

But the emotion with which the most successful suitor of Fortune hears

himself first addressed by a new and honourable title, conferred upon

him for his public deserts, touches his heart less, (if that heart be

sound at the core,) than when after long absence, some one who is

privileged so to use it, accosts him by his christian name,—that

household name which he has never heard but from his nearest

relations, and his old familiar friends. By this it is that we are

known to all around us in childhood; it is used only by our parents

and our nearest kin when that stage is past; and as they drop off, it

dies as to its oral uses with them.

It is because we are remembered more naturally in our family and

paternal circles by our baptismal than our hereditary names, and

remember ourselves more naturally by them, that the Roman Catholic,

renouncing, upon a principle of perverted piety, all natural ties when

he enters a convent and voluntarily dies to the world, assumes a new

one. This is one manifestation of that intense selfishness which the

law of monastic life inculcates, and affects to sanctify. Alas, there

need no motives of erroneous religion to wean us from the ties of

blood and of affection! They are weakened and dissolved by fatal

circumstances and the ways of the world, too frequently and too soon.

“Our men of rank,” said my friend one day when he was speaking upon

this subject, “are not the only persons who go by different

appellations in different parts of their lives. We all moult our names

in the natural course of life. I was Dan in my father's house, and

should still be so with my uncle William and Mr. Guy if they were

still living. Upon my removal to Doncaster my master and mistress

called me Daniel, and my acquaintance Dove. In Holland I was Mynheer

Duif. Now I am the Doctor, and not among my patients only; friends,

acquaintance and strangers address me by this appellation; even my

wife calls me by no other name; and I shall never be any thing but the

Doctor again,—till I am registered at my burial by the same names as

at my christening.”

The doctor, &c., vol. 3 (of 7) · 第 3 / 28 章