FOURTH AND FIFTH OF THE FIVE GLORIOUS MYSTERIES.

“4th. The Assumption of the Blessed Virgin; in which after her

death, twelve years after the Resurrection, she is assumed into

heaven by her Divine Son accompanied by the holy angels.

“5th. The Coronation of the Blessed Virgin; in which, amid the great

jubilee and exultation of the whole court of heaven, and to the

particular glory of all the saints, she is crowned by her Son with

the brightest diadem of glory.”—P. 16.

Extracts from a tract, entitled, “_Our Parish Churches as they were and

as they are_. 1. _Old stones tell tales_.”

“I declare, it seems to me that the very idea of worship has almost

died out in England. Do you think that if people really felt they

were speaking to Almighty God, they would sit at their ease, or look

over a book, and never do more? Church of Englandism has such a

_comfortable_ look about it; it is the religion of people well to do

in the world, and have too much business to transact to turn their

minds thoroughly to anything else. It is a _one day a week_

religion. Every thing about it is so formal, so decent, so sober, so

proper and respectable. It would look so odd to seem in earnest; to

be on your knees in prayer before so many well-dressed people, as

though you had a soul to be saved. Church of Englandism is such a

human thing; it smacks so much of the world and of ‘good society.’

It makes a poor man feel awkward, just as he does when he finds

himself in a gentleman’s drawing-room.”—P. 10.

“The Church of England would never have built such churches, though

it is very proud of them now it has got them, and lately has taken to

making a few others in imitation of the old ones. People never seem

to think of this. They are always bragging about their fine old

parish churches, and their venerable cathedrals, and all the while

they were built by the Papists, as they call them; and if it had not

been for the Papists they would never have had them to brag of. The

sparrow stole into the martin’s nest, and said, See what a nice warm

house I have got. He couldn’t say he had _made_ it, but he was quite

as cocky as if he had.”—P. 11.

“‘And what is this?’ said I again; and I pointed at a curious sort of

niche with a hole at the bottom of it. ‘That,’ said he, ‘is a

_piscina_; it was for pouring the water away after the priest had

washed his hands.’ ‘Why should he wash his hands,’ said I, ‘more

than our ministers?’ ‘Because,’ said Peter, ‘he had to touch the

body of the Lord, and to lift Him up, as when He was raised on the

cross. And your ministers have no need to wash theirs, because they

have not got the body of our Lord there at all.’”—p. 14.

“‘What was the use of saying mass for him,’ said I, ‘when he was dead

and buried?’ Peter smiled, and answered, ‘It is said in the

Scriptures, that it is a good and wholesome thought to pray for the

dead, and it certainly must be so.’”—P. 15.

Extracts from a tract, entitled, “_The Church of our Fathers_.”

“St. Peter, the prince of the apostles, to whom our Lord himself gave

the name of Peter, which signifies a rock, and told him at the same

time that on that rock He would build His Church, and that the gates

of hell should not prevail against it,—this same Peter went to Rome

and became its Bishop; and from that time the Church of Rome, as

being the See of St. Peter, has ever been looked upon by the faithful

as the mother and mistress of all churches, and each of his

successors in turn as the visible head of the Church on earth.”—P. 5.

“It is generally believed that Caractacus settled in Rome with his

family; that his daughter was called Claudia, and that she married a

noble Roman called Pudens, who, together with herself, afterwards

became Christian; that they had a daughter who was afterwards

celebrated as a saint under the name of St. Pudentiana; and that this

Pudens and Claudia, whom St. Paul mentions in his Epistle to Timothy

(2 Tim. iv. 21), were no other than these. It is said also that this

noble British household gave shelter and hospitality to St. Peter,

while he lived as Bishop in Rome; a retired room in the house being

set apart as his chapel. A church was afterwards built on the site

of this house, which having been since twice rebuilt, is still known

by the name of St. Pudentiana; and it is this church which, from its

connexion with the history of our country, has been assigned to

Cardinal Wiseman as the church from which he takes his title.”—P. 7.

“Several miracles attended the death of this our first martyr

(Alban). When on his way to death, he came to a river which divided

the town from the hill where he was to suffer; the people thronged

the bridge over it in such multitudes that he feared he should not be

able to pass all that day, and longing for his crown, raised his eyes

to heaven and prayed. And God straightway divided the waters as for

His people of old, so that he walked through dryshod.”—P. 9.

“The next thing that we hear of the Church in Britain is, that two

bishops from Gaul, Germanus and Lupus, were sent over here to preach

to the people, many of whom had been perverted by false teachers; but

all gladly listened to the preaching of these holy bishops, and

returned to the way of truth. They were the more easily persuaded,

because the preaching of these men was also accompanied by the

working of miracles. After a public conference, in which the

heretics had been completely put to silence by the eloquence of the

bishops, an officer in the Roman army stepped forward with his little

daughter who was blind, and begged that they would bestow such relief

upon her as they were able. The bishops desired him to try first the

powers of those false teachers who had been just now disputing

against them. But these declined the trial, and united with the

officer in begging her cure at the hands of Germanus and Lupus. Upon

this Germanus offered up a short prayer, and invoking the Holy

Trinity, pulled from his bosom a little box of relics which he always

carried about him. This he applied to the girl’s eyes, and her sight

was immediately restored.”—Pp. 9, 10.

Extracts from a tract, entitled, “_How Antichrist keeps Christmas_; or,

_A Peep at Christmas in a Catholic country_.”

“It is true, indeed, that Christmas is a festival of such universal

gladness, as to thaw for a moment even the icy heart of

Protestantism; sending a ray of joyousness down into the cold depths

of the population of this country, where all is so smooth and smiling

on the surface, all so chill and joyless underneath. At Christmas I

really believe a thrill of gladness darts through the heart of the

great majority of the people. Churches and chapels are made gay with

shining leaves and scarlet berries; carols are sung in the streets;

the words, ‘A merry Christmas to you!’ pass from mouth to mouth; and

beef and pudding, the outward form which joy is wont to put on in

this cold, hungry climate, smoke on many a board to which, alas! for

every other day in the year they are utter strangers. Nay, it is to

be hoped that even in union workhouses there is an intermission of

gruel for Christmas day.”—Pp. 4, 5.

“Abundant food is a necessity of our climate, and a condition of our

physical well-being to a degree that the people of the South cannot

understand. We are told of our Saxon forefathers, whom I have before

mentioned, that their frames, though so tall and well-formed, were

neither so patient of labour nor of hunger as might be expected from

their apparent strength. Alas! for the necessity which grinds down

our poor to the endurance of both to such a hurtful degree. But to

return to Christmas. The difference between Catholic and Protestant

Christmas is this, that both love Christmas, but Catholics love it

far more distinctly and consciously for Christ’s sake. The very name

of the festival is theirs, Christ’s Mass; to Protestants one part of

the word has confessedly lost its meaning, and the other is a dim

vision. Look at the professedly religious part of the observance of

this feast, and see what it amounts to. In the churches of the

English establishment, except the holly boughs, what is there to tell

of the Lord’s birth? Of course the lesson from Scripture recounting

that event is read; so also are certain Psalms which prophetically

relate to it; and a sermon on the Nativity is (sometimes) preached.

But otherwise the ordinary routine of the service goes on the same as

usual. ‘Dearly beloved brethren,’ holds on the even tenour of its

way, with dulness scarcely mitigated; and there is really nothing

either peculiarly to draw out the devotion of those assisting at it

towards their infant Lord, nor, which is more to our present purpose,

any special outpouring of such devotion on the part of the Church

herself.”—P. 6.

The Spiritual Improvement of the Census A Sermon, Preached in the Parish Church of All Saints, Fulham, 30th March, 1851 · 第 10 / 16 题