ANTIQUITY OF MALT LIQUOR.

Malt liquor appears to have had its origin in the attention paid by an

eastern sovereign to the comfort and health of his soldiers; as we are

informed by the historian Xenophon, that "the virtuous Cyrus" having

observed the good effects that water in which parched barley had been

steeped, produced, exhorted and commanded his troops to drink this

liquor; the historian entitled it "_Maza_." It is highly probable that

Cyrus adopted this drink to counteract the ill effects of impure and

foul water (which had done lasting injury to other warriors of his

time), which is so common in warm, sunny climates; as Pliny informs

us, that if water be impure or corrupted, by putting fried barley into

it, in less than two hours, it will be pure and sweet; that its bad

effects will have evaporated, and that it then may be drunk with

perfect safety; he further adds that, this is the reason why we are in

the habit of "putting barley-meal into the 'wine-strainers' through

which we pass our wines, that they may be refined, purified, and drawn

the sooner." The information conveyed to our readers by Pliny, may be

made of great practical use and benefit by mariners, to whom sweet

water is such a desideratum; and is as important to those who traverse

the arid deserts of Africa, where sweet water is so seldom found.

That the ancients used the "juice of the grape," and that almost as a

common drink, has never been doubted by the most cursory reader of

history; the knowledge of this liquor being nearly coeval with the

first formation of society. In the Book of Genesis we read that Noah

after the flood planted a vineyard, "_manufactured_" wine, and got

intoxicated with this "nectar fit for gods." Beer can likewise boast

of as great antiquity. Its use was not unknown by the Egyptians; as we

are informed by Herodotus that the people of Egypt made use of _a kind

of wine_ made from dried barley, because no vines grew in that

country. According to Tacitus, in his time beer was the common drink

of the Germans, who drank it in preference to that more stimulating

(if not more nutritious) liquor, wine. We are also informed by Pliny,

that it was made and was in common use amongst the Gauls, and by many

of their neighbours. The name he gave to this drink was "_cerevisia_"

which evidently alludes to the article from which it was composed.

Although these nations held this liquor in such estimation, there has

been no record to inform us of their mode of preparing it.

Ale was introduced into our country centuries ago, by our Saxon

ancestors, and it was not long ere it became the favourite and common

drink of all classes of society. Their habit of drinking it out of

skulls, at their feasts, is well known to the reader of romance. It

was then, as it is now, commonly sold at houses of entertainment to

the people. After the Norman Conquest, the vine was very extensively

planted in England, but was drunk alone, as a chronicle of that time

says, "by the wise and the learned;" the people did not lose their

relish for the beverage of their forefathers, and wine was never held

in much respect by them. Hops had hitherto not been used in the

composition of beer; but about the fifteenth century they were

introduced by the brewers of the Netherlands with great success; from

them we adopted the practice, and they came into general use about two

centuries afterwards. Some historians have affirmed that Henry VI.

forbade the planting of hops; but it is certain that "bluff King Hal"

ordered brewers to put neither hops _nor sulphur_ into their ale. The

taste of the nation in the reign of Henry VI. seems to have changed,

as we find in the records of that time that extensive "privileges"

(_monopolies_ these _enlightened_ times would have called them) were

annexed to hop-grounds. In the reign of James I. the produce of

hop-grounds were insufficient for the consumption, and a law was made

against the introduction of "spoilt hops." Walter Blithe, in his

_Improver Improved_, published in 1649, (3rd edit. 1653) has a chapter

upon improvements by plantations of hops, which has this striking

passage. He observes that "hops were then grown to be a national

commodity; but that it was not many years since the famous city of

London petitioned the Parliament of England against two nuisances; and

these were, Newcastle coals, in regard to their stench, &c., and hops,

in regard they would _spoyl the taste of drink_, and endanger the

people: and, had the Parliament been no wiser than they, we had in a

measure pined, and in a great measure starved; which is just

answerable to the principles of those men who cry down all devices, or

ingenious discoveries, as projects, and therefore stifle and choak

improvements." According to a late writer, in the year 1830, there

were 46,727 acres occupied in the cultivation of hops in Great Britain

alone.

Thirty millions of bushels of barley are annually converted into malt

by the breweries of Great Britain; and upwards of eight millions of

barrels of beer (of which more than four-fifths are strong) are brewed

annually. This enormous consumption attests the fondness of the people

for the beverage of their forefathers.

The Mirror of Literature, Amusement, and Instruction. Volume 20, No. 570, October 13, 1832 · 第 7 / 24 题