THE IRISH CRISIS.

Produced by Brownfox, Charlie Howard, and the Online

Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This

file was produced from images generously made available

by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)

THE

IRISH CRISIS.

THE

IRISH CRISIS.

BY

C. E. TREVELYAN, ESQ.

REPRINTED FROM THE “EDINBURGH REVIEW.”

_No._ CLXXV., _January, 1848_.

LONDON:

LONGMAN, BROWN, GREEN & LONGMANS.

1848.

THE IRISH CRISIS.

The time has not yet arrived at which any man can with confidence

say, that he fully appreciates the nature and the bearings of that

great event which will long be inseparably associated with the year

just departed. Yet we think that we may render some service to the

public by attempting thus early to review, with the calm temper of a

future generation, the history of the great Irish famine of 1847[1].

Unless we are much deceived, posterity will trace up to that famine

the commencement of a salutary revolution in the habits of a nation

long singularly unfortunate, and will acknowledge that on this, as on

many other occasions, Supreme Wisdom has educed permanent good out of

transient evil.

If, a few months ago, an enlightened man had been asked what he thought

the most discouraging circumstance in the state of Ireland, we do not

imagine that he would have pitched upon Absenteeism, or Protestant

bigotry, or Roman Catholic bigotry, or Orangeism, or Ribbandism, or

the Repeal cry, or even the system of threatening notices and midday

assassinations. These things, he would have said, are evils; but some

of them are curable; and others are merely symptomatic. They do not

make the case desperate. But what hope is there for a nation which

lives on potatoes?

The consequences of depending upon the potato as the principal article

of popular food, had long been foreseen by thinking persons; and the

following observations extracted from a paper on the native country of

the wild potato[2], published in the Transactions of the Horticultural

Society of London for the year 1822, are a fair specimen of the

opinions which prevailed on the subject previously to the great failure

of 1845.

“The increased growth of the potato, not only in these

kingdoms, but almost in every civilised part of the globe, has

so added to its importance, that any information respecting

it has become valuable. With the exception of wheat and

rice, it is now certainly the vegetable most employed as the

food of man; and it is probable that the period is at no

great distance, when its extensive use will even place it

before those which have hitherto been considered the chief

staples of life. The effect of the unlimited extent to which

its cultivation may be carried, on the human race, must be

a subject of deep interest to the political economist. The

extension of population will be as unbounded as the production

of food, which is capable of being produced in very small

space, and with great facility; and the increased number of

inhabitants of the earth will necessarily induce changes,

not only in the political systems, but in all the artificial

relations of civilised life. How far such changes may conduce

to or increase the happiness of mankind, is very problematical,

more especially when it is considered, that since the potato,

when in cultivation, is very liable to injury from casualties

of season, and that it is not at present known how to keep it

in store for use beyond a few months, a general failure of the

year’s crop, whenever it shall have become the chief or sole

support of a country, must inevitably lead to all the misery of

famine, more dreadful in proportion to the numbers exposed to

its ravages.”

The important influence which has been exercised by this root over

the destinies of the human race, arises from the fact that it yields

an unusually abundant produce as compared with the extent of ground

cultivated, and with the labour, capital, and skill bestowed upon its

cultivation. The same land, which when laid down to corn, will maintain

a given number of persons, will support three times that number when

used for raising potatoes. “A family in the West of Ireland, once

located on from one to three or four acres of land, was provided

for; a cabin could be raised in a few days without the expense of a

sixpence; the potatoes, at the cost of a very little labour, supplied

them with a sufficiency of food, with which, from habit, they were

perfectly content; and a pig, or with some, a cow, or donkey, or pony,

and occasional labour at a very low rate of wages, gave them what was

necessary to pay a rent, and for such clothing and other articles as

were absolutely necessary, and which, with a great proportion, were

on the lowest scale of human existence. The foundation of the whole,

however, was the possession of the bit of land; it was the one, and the

only one thing absolutely necessary; the rent consequently was high,

and generally well paid, being the first demand on all money received,

in order to secure that essential tenure; and only what remained

became applicable to other objects. Although of the lowest grade, it

was an easy mode of subsistence, and led to the encouragement of early

marriages, large families, and a rapidly-increasing population, and at

the same time afforded the proprietor very good return of profit for

his land[3].”

The relations of employer and employed, which knit together the

framework of society, and establish a mutual dependence and good-will,

have no existence in the potato system. The Irish small holder lives

in a state of isolation, the type of which is to be sought for in

the islands of the South Sea, rather than in the great civilized

communities of the ancient world. A fortnight for planting, a week

or ten days for digging, and another fortnight for turf-cutting,

suffice for his subsistence; and during the rest of the year, he is

at leisure to follow his own inclinations, without even the safeguard

of those intellectual tastes and legitimate objects of ambition which

only imperfectly obviate the evils of leisure in the higher ranks of

society. The excessive competition for land maintained rents at a

level which left the Irish peasant the bare means of subsistence; and

poverty, discontent, and idleness, acting on his excitable nature,

produced that state of popular feeling which furnishes the material

for every description of illegal association and misdirected political

agitation. That agrarian code which is at perpetual war with the

laws of God and man, is more especially the offspring of this state

of society, the primary object being to secure the possession of the

plots of land, which, in the absence of wages, are the sole means of

subsistence.

There is a gradation even in potatoes. Those generally used by the

people of Ireland were of the coarsest and most prolific kind, called

“Lumpers,” or “Horse Potatoes,” from their size, and they were, for

the most part, cultivated, not in furrows, but in the slovenly mode

popularly known as “lazy beds;” so that the principle of seeking the

cheapest description of food at the smallest expense of labour, was

maintained in all its force. To the universal dependence on the potato,

and to the absence of farmers of a superior class, it was owing that

agriculture of every description was carried on in a negligent,

imperfect manner[4]. The domestic habits arising out of this mode of

subsistence were of the lowest and most degrading kind. The pigs and

poultry, which share the food of the peasant’s family, became, in

course, inmates of the cabin also. The habit of exclusively living on

this root produced an entire ignorance of every other food and of the

means of preparing it; and there is scarcely a woman of the peasant

class in the West of Ireland, whose culinary art exceeds the boiling of

a potato. Bread is scarcely ever seen, and an oven is unknown.

The first step to improvement was wanting to this state of things. The

people had no incitement to be industrious to procure comforts which

were utterly beyond their reach, and which many of them perhaps had

never seen. Their ordinary food being of the cheapest and commonest

description, and having no value in the market, it gave them no command

of butcher’s meat, manufactures, colonial produce, or any other article

of comfort or enjoyment. To those who subsist chiefly on corn, other

articles of equal value are available, which can be substituted for it

at their discretion; or if they please, they can, by the adoption of a

less expensive diet, accumulate a small capital by which their future

condition may be improved and secured; but the only hope for those who

lived upon potatoes was in some great intervention of Providence to

bring back the potato to its original use and intention as an adjunct,

and not as a principal article of national food; and by compelling the

people of Ireland to recur to other more nutritious means of aliment,

to restore the energy and the vast industrial capabilities of that

country.

A population, whose ordinary food is wheat and beef, and whose ordinary

drink is porter and ale, can retrench in periods of scarcity, and

resort to cheaper kinds of food, such as barley, oats, rice, and

potatoes. But those who are habitually and entirely fed on potatoes,

live upon the extreme verge of human subsistence, and when they are

deprived of their accustomed food, there is nothing cheaper to which

they can resort. They have already reached the lowest point in the

descending scale, and there is nothing beyond but starvation or

beggary. Several circumstances aggravate the hazard of this position.

The produce of the potato is more precarious than that of wheat or

any other grain. Besides many other proofs of the uncertainty of this

crop, there is no instance on record of any such failure of the crops

of corn, as occurred in the case of potatoes in 1821, 1845, 1846,

and 1847; showing that this root can no longer be depended upon as a

staple article of human food. The potato cannot be stored so that the

scarcity of one year may be alleviated by bringing forward the reserves

of former years, as is always done in corn-feeding countries. Every

year is thus left to provide subsistence for itself. When the crop

is luxuriant, the surplus must be given to the pigs; and when it is

deficient, famine and disease necessarily prevail. Lastly, the bulk

of potatoes is such, that they can with difficulty be conveyed from

place to place to supply local deficiencies, and it has often happened

that severe scarcity has prevailed in districts within fifty miles of

which potatoes were to be had in abundance. If a man use two pounds

of meal a-day (which is twice the amount of the ration found to be

sufficient during the late relief operations), a hundredweight of meal

will last him for fifty-six days; whereas a hundredweight of potatoes

will not last more than eight days; and when it was proposed to provide

seed-potatoes for those who had lost their stock in the failure of

1845-6, the plan was found impracticable, because nearly a ton an acre

would have been required for the purpose.

The potato does not, in fact, last even a single year. The old crop

becomes unfit for use in July, and the new crop, as raised by the

inferior husbandry of the poor, does not come into consumption until

September. Hence, July and August are called the “meal months,” from

the necessity the people are under of living upon meal at that period.

This is always a season of great distress and trial for the poorer

peasants; and in the districts in which the potato system has been

carried to the greatest extent, as, for instance, in the barony of

Erris in the county of Mayo, there has been an annual dearth in the

summer months for many years past. Every now and then a “meal year”

occurs, and then masses of the population become a prey to famine and

fever, except so far as they may be relieved by charity.

In 1739 an early and severe frost destroyed the potatoes in the ground,

and the helplessness and despair of the people having led to a great

falling off of tillage in 1740, the calamity was prolonged to the

ensuing year, 1741, which was long known as the _bliadhain an air_, or

year of slaughter. The ordinary burial-grounds were not large enough

to contain those who died by the roadside, or who were taken from the

deserted cabins. The “bloody flux” and “malignant fever,” having begun

among the poor, spread to the rich, and numerous individuals occupying

prominent positions in society, including one of the judges (Mr.

Baron Wainwright), and the Mayor of Limerick (Joseph Roche, Esq.), and

many others of the corporation, fell victims. Measures were adopted

at Dublin on the principle of the English Poor Law, some of the most

essential provisions of which appear to have been well understood

in the great towns of Ireland in that day; and it was “hoped, since

such provision is made for the poor, the inhabitants of the city will

discourage all vagrant beggars, and give their assistance that they

may be sent to Bridewell to hard labour, and thereby free themselves

from a set of idlers who are a scandal and a reproach to the nation.”

Soup-kitchens and other modes of relief were established in different

parts of the country, in which Primate Boulter and the Society of

Friends took the lead; and numerous cargoes of corn were procured on

mercantile account from the North American Colonies, the arrival of

which was looked for with great anxiety. In only one point is there

any decided difference between what then took place in Ireland and the

painful events which have just occurred, after the lapse of upwards

of a century. The famine of 1741 was not regarded with any active

interest either in England or in any foreign country, and the subject

is scarcely alluded to in the literature of the day. No measures were

adopted either by the Executive or the Legislature for the purpose of

relieving the distress caused by this famine. There is no mention of

grants or loans; but an Act was passed by the Irish Parliament in 1741

(15 Geo. II, cap. 8), “For the more effectual securing the payment of

Rents, and preventing frauds by Tenants[5].”

The failure of 1822, in the provinces of Munster and Connaught, was

owing to a continued and excessive humidity, which caused the potatoes

to rot after they had been stored in the pits, so that the deficiency

of food was not discovered till late in the season. On the 7th May,

1822, a public meeting was held in London which was attended by the

Archbishop of Canterbury and the most eminent persons of the day,

when a committee of no less than 109 of the nobility and gentry was

formed, and a subscription was entered into, amounting, with the aid

of a king’s letter, to 311,081ℓ. 5s., 7d., of which 44,177ℓ. 9s. was

raised in Ireland. Many excellent principles were laid down for the

distribution of this large sum; and after reserving what was required

for immediate relief, the balance, amounting to 87,667ℓ., was granted

to various societies which had been established for the future and

permanent benefit of the Irish peasantry[6]. A committee also sat at

the Mansion House at Dublin, which collected 31,260ℓ. from various

quarters, independently of the grants it received from the London

Committee. Central Committees were established in each county town

in the distressed districts, and Sub-Committees in each parish. The

western portion of Ireland was also divided into three districts,

to each of which a civil engineer was appointed for the purpose of

employing the destitute in making roads, and the following sums were

voted by Parliament for carrying on these and other Public Works set on

foot with the same object of relieving the distress[7]:

On 24 June, 1822, £100,000,

“for the employment of the poor in Ireland, and other purposes

relating thereto as the exigency of affairs may require.”

On 23 July, 1822, £200,000,

“to enable His Majesty to take such measures as the exigency of

affairs may require.”

And on the 24 June, 1823, £15,000 was voted,

“to facilitate emigration from the south of Ireland to the Cape

of Good Hope.”

In 1831 another failure of the potato crop occurred in the counties

of Galway, Mayo, and Donegal, upon which another meeting was held in

the City of London, and one committee was established at the Mansion

House, and another at the West End. Great exertions were made to raise

subscriptions; a bazaar was held at the Hanover Square Rooms by many

of the ladies of the nobility, presided over by the Queen in person;

and there was a ball at Drury Lane Theatre, which was honoured by

the presence of the King and Queen. The whole amount collected was

74,410ℓ.; and besides this 40,000ℓ. was granted by Parliament, part of

which was expended on relief works, and part in the actual distribution

of food. Besides these London Committees, two other Committees were

formed at Dublin, through one of which (the Mansion House Committee[8])

8,569ℓ. was collected, and through the other (the Sackville Street

Committee) 21,526ℓ.

In each of the years 1835, 1836, and 1837, the potato crop failed

in one or other of the districts in the West of Ireland, and sums

amounting in the aggregate to 7,572ℓ. were expended from Civil

Contingencies in relieving the distress thereby occasioned, to which

was added the sum of 4,306ℓ. remaining from the English and Irish

subscriptions of 1831.

In 1839 another failure occurred; and in all the Western and Midland

Counties, the average price of potatoes in July and August was 7d. a

stone, and of oatmeal 18s. or 19s. a cwt.; the former double, and the

latter one-third more than the usual price at that time of the year.

On this occasion Captain Chads, R.N., was deputed by the Government

to assist the landlords in employing the destitute in constructing

roads and other useful public works; and it appears from a report

addressed by him to the Chancellor of the Exchequer, dated the 22nd

of August, 1839, that 5,441ℓ. was expended in this way, of which

1840ℓ. was contributed by the Government, besides 1478ℓ. disbursed

through other channels. Towards the conclusion of his report Captain

Chads made the following remarks:--“A recurrence of these seasons of

distress, which have been almost periodical hitherto, must, I fear,

be necessarily expected, so long as the present condition of the poor

continues, and whilst they subsist on that species of food, which in

a year of plenty cannot be stored up for the next, which may be one

of scarcity. A very great alleviation, however, of this evil is most

confidently expected from the Poor Law now being established. I have

conversed on this subject with persons of every class of society, from

one end of the country to the other, and it is universally regarded

as the promise of a great blessing:--to the poor by inducing more

provident and industrious habits; and by making it the interest of the

landlords to give them employment; and to all other classes, comfort

and contentment, from the knowledge that the really distressed are

provided for, and that the country is generally improving by the

extension of employment.”

After this, urgent representations of distress were made in each year

to the Irish Government and to the Poor Law Commissioners, until the

summer of 1842, which was more than usually wet and unfavourable to

vegetation, and it therefore again became necessary to have recourse to

extensive measures of relief. On this occasion 3,448ℓ. was distributed

in aid of local subscriptions, in 121 separate districts; the aggregate

sums raised in each case being expended, partly in public works on

Captain Chads’ plan, and partly in giving gratuitous relief[9].

Besides the grants above enumerated, made for the immediate relief

of the Irish poor, when failures of the potato crop caused unusual

distress, large sums of money have been advanced or granted from the

Imperial Treasury from time to time since the Union, for various

purposes supposed to be conducive to the tranquillity and improvement

of the country, and to the removal of the causes of permanent distress,

as will be seen from the following specimens taken principally from a

return to an order of the House of Commons of the 12th February, 1847,

made on the motion of Mr. John O’Connell[10].

Works for Special Purposes under the Act 57

Geo. III., cap. 34 496,000

Do. for the Employment and Relief of the

Poor, under the 1 & 2 Wm. IV., cap. 33,

and previous Acts 1,339,146

Grants in aid of Public Works under various

Acts of Parliament 125,000

Advanced by the London Loan Commissioners

for sundry Works between 1826 and 1833 322,500

Do. do. for Poor Law Union Workhouses 1,145,800

Kingstown Harbour 1,124,586

Improvement of the River Shannon 533,359

Wide Street Commissioners, Dublin 267,778

Improving Post Roads 515,541

Gaols and Bridewells 713,005

Asylums for Lunatic Poor 710,850

Valuation of Lands and Tenements 172,774

Royal Dublin Society 285,438

Farming Society, Dublin 87,132

Linen Board, Dublin 537,656

Tithe (Relief of Clergy who did not receive

Tithes of 1831) 50,916

Tithe Relief (Million Act) 918,863

Tithe Relief Commissioners (establishing

Composition for Tithes) 279,217

Relief of Trade 178,070

Boards and Officers of Health (Cholera) 196,575

Police Purposes (Proclaimed Districts) 4,693,871

Police Purposes (Constabulary Police) 1,748,712

Other causes concurred with the natural tendency of every people to

have recourse to the cheapest description of food, in encouraging the

growth of a large population depending for its subsistence on the

potato. Ireland was essentially a grazing country until the artificial

enhancement of prices caused by the Acts of the Irish Parliament

passed in 1783 and 1784, for granting a bounty on the exportation,

and restricting the importation of corn, occasioned an immediate and

extraordinary increase of cultivation; and as, owing to the general

want of capital, it was impossible to find tenants for large tillage

farms, the stimulus intended to act exclusively on agriculture, had a

still more powerful effect in causing the subdivision of farms. The new

occupiers also, being, for the most part, exceedingly poor, instead of

paying their labourers in money, allowed them the use of small pieces

of ground whereon they might erect cabins and raise potatoes, and their

labour was set off, at so much a-day, against the annual rent. The plan

of dividing and subdividing for the purpose of making freeholders,

was carried to a great extent after 1792, when the elective franchise

was restored to the Roman Catholics; and although the practice was far

from being general, yet in some parts of the country, where particular

families made it their object to contest or secure the county, it

was carried to a very pernicious extent. Another powerful cause is

that the emoluments of the Roman Catholic priesthood, including the

bishops, depend not only on the extent of the population, but also on

its continual increase; and if the parish priests object to emigration

and the consolidation of small holdings, and look with favour on

early marriages, it is only what any other body of men, in their

circumstances, would equally do. Lastly, the small holding and potato

system offered the inducement of large rents, obtained at the smallest

possible amount of cost and trouble. The embarrassed and improvident

landlord, and the leaseholder whose only object it was to make the

most of his short tenure, equally found their account in this state of

things, and the result in both cases was, that the farms were covered

with hovels and miserable cottiers, in order, through them, to create

profit-rents. When the failure of the potato forced all the “squatters”

and “mock tenants” into notice, the owner of many a neglected estate

was surprised by the apparition of hundreds of miserable beings, who

had grown up on his property without his knowledge, and now claimed the

means of support at his hands. The subsistence of the tenant was at

the minimum; the rent was at the maximum; and the interval between the

ignorant excitable peasantry and the proprietor in chief, was filled

only by the middleman, whose business it was to exact rents and not to

employ labourers. The base and the capital of the column were there,

but the shaft was almost entirely wanting.

The extent to which the welfare of the agricultural population,

and through them of the rest of the community, is affected by the

conditions upon which landed property is held, has become fearfully

apparent during the present social crisis. The dependence for good

and evil of workman on master manufacturer, of subject on Government,

of child on father, is less absolute than that of the Irish peasant

upon the lord of the soil from which he derives his subsistence. This

is a subject to which, if we would save ourselves and our country,

it behoves us to give our most earnest and careful attention at

the present time. We cannot give landed proprietors the will and

disposition (where it is wanting) to fulfil the important part they

have to perform in the scheme of society, but we have it in our power

to strike off the fetters which at present impede every step of their

progress in the performance of the duty they owe to themselves and to

those dependent on them.

One half of the surface of Ireland is said to be let off in perpetuity

leases, with derivative and subderivative interests in an endless

chain, so as to obtain profit-rents at each stage; and these leases

are often open to the additional objection that they are unnecessarily

burthensome or uncertain from the particular mode in which they are

made; such as “leases for lives renewable for ever by the insertion

of other lives when the first-named are dead,” “for three lives _or_

thirty-one years,” and “for three lives _and_ thirty-one years.” Many

proposals have at different times been made for the redemption of these

various interests; but an arbitrary interference with the rights of

property is to be avoided, and our object should rather be to give

every prudent facility for the voluntary transfer of land and of

the various interests connected with it, which must lead, by a safe

but certain gradation, to that degree of improvement of the existing

tenures which is necessary for the encouragement of agriculture. In the

flourishing islands of Guernsey and Jersey, corn-rents of fixed amount

are charged upon the same farm one after another, like the coats of

an onion; but the lowest holder, who is the party really interested

in the improvement of the property, has every requisite security that

he will enjoy the whole profit of any outlay he may make, and the

most essential part of the benefit of ownership is thus obtained. In

Mayo and other western counties the old barbarous Irish tenure called

_Rundale_ (Scotch _runrigg_), still prevails, which stops short of the

institution of individual property, and by making the industrious and

thriving responsible for the short-comings of the idle and improvident,

effectually destroys the spring of all improvement. The cessation of

this antiquated system is an indispensable preliminary to any progress

being made in the localities where it exists; but this improvement may

be effected by the landlords without any change in the law.

The master evil of the agricultural system of Ireland, however, is the

law of Entail, and the Incumbrances which seldom fail to accumulate

upon entailed estates. “Proprietors of estates,” observes the author of

an excellent pamphlet which has recently appeared on this subject[11],

“are too often but mere nominal owners, without influence or power over

the persons holding under them. Their real condition is often pitiable,

nor is it possible, in the great majority of cases, to retrieve the

estates. The burthen of debt, or the evils of improvident leases, are

fastened upon the land in such a manner as to convert the owner into

a mere annuitant, often glad to obtain from a good estate a scanty

annuity (after payment of the incumbrances thereon and the public

burthens) for his own subsistence. Proprietor and tenant are equally

powerless for good; and the whole kingdom suffers from the disorders

which have resulted from this state of real property in Ireland.” And

the author of another valuable publication on the same subject[12]

observes as follows: “The evils resulting from settlements and entails

may be regarded as arising from insecurity or uncertainty of tenure;

because the possessor of the property is not in reality the owner; he

cannot deal with it as an owner; he is merely a trustee for others; he

has no interest in its future thorough permanent improvement, except

so far as he may wish to benefit his successors; he can never reap

the benefit himself; he cannot sell; he cannot dispose of a part,

even though the alienation of a part might greatly enhance the value

of the remainder; he holds it during his lifetime, as his predecessor

held it, unaltered, unimproved, to transmit it to his heir clogged

with the same restrictions alike injurious to him and to his country.

This is the case of an unembarrassed landlord[13]. But let us suppose,

as is unfortunately too often the case, that he has received the

estate incumbered under a settlement, with a jointure to the widow of

the late possessor, and a provision for daughters and younger sons.

In what difficulties is he at once involved! this owner for life of

a large tract of country with a long rent-roll, but in fact a small

property! He cannot maintain his position in society without spending

more than his income; debts accumulate; he mortgages his estate, and

insures his life for the security of the mortgagee. Of course he cannot

afford to lay out anything on improvements; on the contrary, though

perhaps naturally kind-hearted and just, his necessities force him to

resort to every means of increasing his present rental. He looks for

the utmost amount; he lets to the highest bidder, without regard to

character or means of payment. If his tenants are without leases, he

raises their rents. If leases fall in, he cannot afford to give the

preference to the last occupier. Perhaps, with all his exertions, he is

unable to pay the interest or put off his creditors. Proceedings are

commenced against him, and the estate passes during his lifetime under

the care of the worst possible landlord, a Receiver under the Court of

Chancery[14].”

The remedy for this state of things is simply the sale of the

encumbered estate, or of a sufficient portion of it to enable the owner

to discharge his encumbrances and to place him in a position to do his

duty towards the remainder. This is the master-key to unlock the field

of industry in Ireland. The seller, in all such cases, is incapable of

making a proper use of the land. The purchaser, on the other hand, may

safely be assumed to be an improver. It is a natural feeling in which

almost all men indulge, and purchases of land are seldom made without

a distinct view to further profitable investments in improvements. “To

give every prudent facility for the transfer by sale of real property

from man to man, by the adoption of a simple, cheap, and secure system

of transfer, in lieu of the present barbarous, unsafe, and expensive

system, so that real property could be bought and sold in Ireland with

as much freedom and security as other property[15],” is, therefore,

the object at which we ought to aim, and especially to encourage

the investment of small capitals in the land, it being through the

instrumentality of small capitalists chiefly that the country can

be civilized and improved. “The purchasers would give extensive and

permanent employment to numbers of people around them in carrying out

that natural desire of man, the improvement of newly-acquired landed

property; they would promote industry everywhere; they would greatly

increase the value of land generally. By their number, all property

in land would be rendered secure against revolutionary violence. The

habits and example of men who had made money by industry, and who might

invest their savings in land, would place the social system of Ireland

on a solid basis. The best of the Protestants and Roman Catholics,

those who had been careful and industrious, would be purchasers of

land, and all would have a common interest in peace and order. That

surplus population beyond the means of present employment, which now

oppresses and embarrasses the country, might gradually be absorbed, and

become a source of wealth and strength. Towns would everywhere improve,

and new ones might arise by the extension of the railway system,

spreading industry and civilization among men now sunk in indolence and

almost barbarism[16].”

All the parties concerned in these transfers would be benefited by

them. Lands are comparatively valueless to those who have no capital

to improve them, and they are often justly felt to be a burthen and a

disgrace, because they entail duties which the nominal owners have no

means of performing. The effect on the character and prospects of the

whole body of landed proprietors would be as described in the following

passage from the author to whom we are already so much indebted: “When

men, however young, act under responsibility, they usually proceed

with caution; if others will think and act for them, and provide

for their wants, and secure them from poverty and danger, their own

prudential faculties may become dormant; and a man or any class of men

so protected, are likely to exhibit deficiency in the qualities of

prudence and good management of their affairs. But owners of land would

not evince any such deficiency, if once they felt that they would be

ruined, and their families also, if they were not governed by the same

rules of prudence which other men must observe, and which necessarily

enter into the proper management of all other descriptions of property.

The present difficulties of sale of land, and the consequent protection

afforded to entailed properties, are the chief reasons why so many

persons of the class of proprietors are in difficulties. With more

liberty, there would be more prudence and more attention to estates

on the part of owners, from which they and the country would be great

gainers[17].”

The manner in which the interests of the public at large are affected,

is correctly described in the following passage from the other

pamphlet: “If these premises be correct; if employment with regular

wages must be found for the peasantry: if capital be necessary, and the

parties holding the land do not possess sufficient for this purpose;

it follows, either that Government must continue to supply the capital

required, not merely by a loan on an emergency, but as part of its

regular system of action; or else that the land must pass into the

hands of those who do possess the means of employing the people--of men

who will carry on agriculture as a business, and will bring to their

occupation the capital, the habits of business, and the energy and

intelligence which have raised the commerce and manufactures of this

nation to their present pre-eminence[18].”

Her Majesty’s Government being deeply impressed with the importance of

these views, introduced a bill into Parliament in the session of 1847,

the object of which was to enable the owners of encumbered estates in

Ireland to sell the whole or a portion of them, after the circumstances

of each estate had been investigated by a Master in Chancery with a

view to secure the due liquidation of every claim upon it. The sale

was not to take place without the consent of the first incumbrancer,

unless the Court of Chancery should consider the produce sufficient

to pay the principal and all arrears of interest, or unless the owner

or some subsequent incumbrancer should undertake to pay to the first

incumbrancer any deficiency which might exist, and give such security

for the performance of his undertaking as the court might direct. This

bill passed the House of Lords, but was withdrawn in the Commons, owing

to the opposition of some of the Irish proprietors, and to objections

entertained by the great Insurance Companies, who are the principal

lenders on Irish mortgages, to having their investments disturbed. The

failure of the bill was a national misfortune which cannot be too soon

remedied.

The Government, however, did what was in its power. A system has

existed in Ireland since the time of Queen Anne for the registration

of all deeds affecting landed property; and of late years a similar

registration has been established of all judgments relating to that

description of property. The attention of the Lord Lieutenant has been

called to the practicability of diminishing the delay and expense

attending transfers of landed property, by the adoption of two simple

practical measures, viz., that when searches have been made in the

office of the Registrar of Deeds, copies should be recorded in the

office, as well as given to the parties on whose behalf they are made;

and that when judgments, &c., recorded in the office of the Registrar

of Judgments have been satisfied, notice should be immediately sent to

the Registrar, in order that such satisfaction may be recorded in the

books of his office[19]. The consequence of the neglect of the first of

these obvious precautions was, that, after expensive searches had been

made in the Registry Office, the same searches often had to be made

again and again, at the same expense, at the instance of other parties,

however limited the transactions might be for the security of which

these inquiries into past transfers and incumbrances were made; and the

consequence of the neglect of the other precaution was, that if, after

a search had been made through the records deposited in the office of

the Registrar of Judgments, to ascertain whether any judgment had been

passed against the estate, it appeared that any such judgment had been

given, another search had to be made in the courts of law, involving

fresh loss of time and fresh expense, to ascertain whether it had been

satisfied[20].

But it is time that we should resume our narrative.

The potato disease, which had manifested itself in North America in

1844[21], first appeared in these islands late in the autumn of 1845.

The early crop of potatoes, which is generally about one-sixth of the

whole, and is dug in September and October, escaped; but the late,

or what is commonly called the “people’s crop,” and is taken up in

December and January, was tainted after it arrived at an advanced

stage of maturity. When the disease had once commenced, it made steady

progress, and it was often found, on opening the pits, that the

potatoes had become a mass of rottenness. Nevertheless, this year the

attack was partial; and although few parts of the country entirely

escaped, and the destruction of human food was, on the whole, very

great, a considerable portion of the crop, which had been a more than

usually large one, was saved. The wheat crop was a full average; oats

and barley were abundant; and of turnips, carrots, and green crops,

including a plentiful hay harvest, there was a more than sufficient

supply. On the Continent, the rye crops failed partially, and the

potato disease was very destructive in Holland, Belgium, France, and

the west of Germany.

In the following year (1846) the blight in the potatoes took place

earlier, and was of a much more sweeping and decisive kind. “On the

27th of last month (July), I passed,” Father Mathew writes in a letter

published in the Parliamentary Papers, “from Cork to Dublin, and this

doomed plant bloomed in all the luxuriance of an abundant harvest.

Returning on the 3rd instant (August), I beheld with sorrow one wide

waste of putrefying vegetation. In many places the wretched people were

seated on the fences of their decaying gardens, wringing their hands,

and wailing bitterly the destruction that had left them foodless.” The

first symptom of the disease was a little brown spot on the leaf, and

these spots gradually increased in number and size, until the foliage

withered and the stem became brittle, and snapped off immediately when

touched. In less than a week the whole process was accomplished[22].

The fields assumed a blackened appearance, as if they had been burnt

up, and the growth of the potatoes was arrested when they were not

larger than a marble or a pigeon’s egg. No potatoes were pitted this

year. In many districts where they had been most abundant, full-grown

wholesome potatoes were not to be procured; and even in London and

other large towns, they were sold at fancy prices, and were consumed as

a luxury by the wealthy, rice and other substitutes being had recourse

to by the body of the people. The crop of wheat this year was barely

an average one, while barley and oats, and particularly the former,

were decidedly deficient. On the Continent, the rye and potato crops

again failed, and prices rose early in the season above those ruling

in England, which caused the shipments from the Black Sea, Turkey and

Egypt, to be sent to France, Italy, and Belgium; and it was not till

late in the season, that our prices rose to a point which turned the

current of supplies towards England and Ireland. The Indian corn crop

in the United States this year was very abundant, and it became a

resource of the utmost value to this country.

In the third year (1847) the disease had nearly exhausted itself. It

appeared in different parts of the country, but the plants generally

exerted fresh vigour and outgrew it. The result, perhaps, could not

have been better. The wholesome distrust in the potato was maintained,

while time was allowed for making the alterations which the new state

of things required. Although the potatoes sown in Ireland in the year

1847 were estimated only at 1/5th or 1/6th of the usual quantity,

it would have been a serious aggravation of the difficulties and

discouragements under which that portion of the empire was suffering,

if the disease had reappeared in its unmitigated form. The crops of

wheat, barley, and oats, in almost every part of the United Kingdom,

and in most of the neighbouring countries on the Continent, were this

year, to use the epithet generally applied to them, magnificent; and

it became more and more apparent on the brink of what a precipice we

had been standing, as the unusually small remaining stock of old corn

came to light, and the exhausted and embarrassed state to which every

description of business had been reduced, notwithstanding the advantage

of a good harvest, gradually declared itself.

Among the numerous causes which enhanced the difficulty of obtaining

adequate foreign supplies at moderate rates during the most exigent

period of the winter of 1846-7, one of the most embarrassing, was

the sudden and extraordinary advance in freights, which occurred

simultaneously in the ports of the United States of America, the

Mediterranean, and the Black Sea. Vessels were not obtainable in the

Black Sea and the Danube at less than 18s. and 22s. per quarter for

corn, whereas the usual rates are 9s. and 11s.; while in the United

States, where large shipments of grain, flour, and Indian corn, were

going forward to Europe, the comparatively limited number of vessels

caused the rates to run up to 9s. per barrel for flour, and 16s. and

18s. per quarter for Indian corn to British ports, the rates usually

given being 2s. 6d. to 3s. 6d. per barrel of flour, and 8s. and 9s. per

quarter for Indian corn.

On the 27th January, 1846, Sir Robert Peel proposed his measure for

the relaxation of the duties on the importation of foreign corn, by

which the scale of duties payable on wheat was to range from 4s. to

10s. per quarter, and Indian corn, which had previously been charged

with the same duty as barley, was to pay only 1s. a-quarter. This was

to last till February 1849, when an uniform duty of 1s. a-quarter

was to be charged on every description of grain. The bill passed the

House of Lords on the 29th June, 1846; and Sir R. Peel announced his

resignation in the House of Commons on the same day.

Immediately on the meeting of Parliament in January, 1847, Lord J.

Russell introduced bills to suspend until the 1st September, 1847, the

duties on foreign corn, and the restrictions imposed by the Navigation

Laws on the importation of corn in foreign vessels; and he at the same

time moved a resolution permitting the use of sugar in breweries; all

which measures received the sanction of the Legislature. At the close

of the same session, the suspension of the Corn and Navigation Laws was

extended to the 1st March, 1848.

On the first appearance of the blight in the autumn of 1845, Professors

Kane, Lindley, and Playfair, were appointed by Sir Robert Peel to

inquire into the nature of it, and to suggest the best means of

preserving the stock of potatoes from its ravages. The result showed

that the mischief lay beyond the knowledge and power of man. Every

remedy which science or experience could dictate was had recourse to,

but the potato equally melted away under the most opposite modes of

treatment.

The next step was to order from the United States of America 100,000ℓ.

worth of Indian corn. It was considered that the void caused by the

failure of the potato crop might be filled, with the least disturbance

of private trade and market prices, by the introduction of a new

description of popular food. Owing to the prohibitory duty, Indian corn

was unknown as an article of consumption in the United Kingdom[23].

Private merchants, therefore, could not complain of interference with

a trade which did not exist, nor could prices be raised against the

home consumer on an article of which no stock was to be found in the

home market. Nevertheless, with a view to avoid as long as possible,

the doubts and apprehensions which must have arisen if the Government

had appeared as a purchaser in a new class of operations, pains were

taken to keep the transaction secret, and the first cargoes from

America had been more than a fortnight in Cork harbour before it became

generally known that such a measure was in progress.

In order to distribute the food so obtained, central depôts were

established in various parts of Ireland, under the direction of

officers of the Commissariat, with sub-depôts under the charge of the

Constabulary and Coast Guard; and, when the supplies in the local

markets were deficient, meal was sold from these depôts at reasonable

prices to Relief Committees, where any existed, and where they did not,

to the labourers themselves. In the time of the heaviest pressure (June

and July 1846), one sub-depôt retailed 20 tons of meal daily, and the

issues from a single main depôt to its dependencies amounted to 233

tons in one week.

The Relief Committees were formed, under the superintendence of a

Central Commission at Dublin, for the purpose of selling food in detail

to those who could buy it, and of giving it to those who could not; the

requisite funds being derived from private subscriptions, added to, in

certain proportions, by Government donations. The Relief Committees

also selected the persons to be employed on the Relief Works carried on

under the superintendence of the Board of Works.

If the Irish poor had been in the habit of buying their food, as is

the case in England, the object would have been attained when a cheap

substitute had been provided for the potato; but as the labouring class

in Ireland had hitherto subsisted on potatoes grown by themselves, and

money wages were almost unknown, it was necessary to adopt some means

of giving the people a command over the new description of food. This

was done by establishing a system of public works, in accordance with

the previous practice on similar occasions, both in Ireland and in

other countries.

These works, which consisted principally of roads, were undertaken on

the application of the magistrates and principal cess-payers, under

the Act 9 & 10 Vic., c. 1, which was passed for the purpose, and the

expense of executing them was defrayed by advances of public money,

half of which was a grant, and half a loan to be repaid by the barony.

The largest number of persons employed in this first season of relief

was 97,000, in August, 1846.

The first symptoms of neglected tillage appeared in the Spring of 1846,

and they were worst in those districts in which the Relief Works were

carried on to the greatest extent. The improvements in progress on the

Shannon and the arterial drainages were also impeded by the preference

which the labourers showed for the Relief Works.

The measures of which we have been speaking were brought to a close

on the 15th August, 1846, and they may be considered to have answered

their end. The scarcity being partial and local, the deficiency of one

part of the country was supplied from the superabundance of others,

and the pains taken to prevent the people from suffering want, led

to their being better off than in ordinary years. Above all, Ireland

was prepared by the course adopted during this probationary season of

distress, as it may be called, to bear better the heavy affliction of

the succeeding season. No misapplication of the funds deserving of

notice took place, except in the instance of the Relief Works, the

cause of which was as follows:--The landed proprietors of Ireland

had long been accustomed to rely upon Government loans and grants

for making improvements of various kinds, and the terms on which the

Relief Works were to be executed being more advantageous than any

which had been open to them for many years before, a rush took place

from all quarters upon this fund, and the special object of relieving

the people from the consequences of the failure of their accustomed

food, was to a great extent lost sight of in the general fear, which

in many cases was not attempted to be concealed, of being deprived of

what the persons interested called “their share of the grant.” This

description of relief, therefore, instead of acting as a test of real

distress, operated as a bounty on applications for public works from

a class of persons who were at once charged with the administration

of the relief and were interested in the execution of the works. The

result was that, while the applications amounted to 1,289,816ℓ., the

sum actually sanctioned and expended was only 476,000ℓ., and great part

even of this was merely yielded to the distressing appeals pressed on

the Lord Lieutenant on the plea of urgent local destitution, and of

the lamentable consequences to be expected from allowing it to remain

unrelieved. The other expenses connected with this season of relief

were as follows:--Loans on grand jury presentments, 130,000ℓ.; loss

on the purchase and sale of grain, 50,000ℓ.; given in aid of Relief

Committees, 69,845ℓ.; extra staff of the Board of Works, 7,527ℓ.; thus

making the whole sum expended in relief to Ireland, up to the 15th

August, 1846, 733,372ℓ., of which 368,000ℓ. was in loans, and 365,372ℓ.

in grants. The sum raised by voluntary subscription through the Relief

Committees was 98,000ℓ.

The new and more decisive failure of the potato crop called for great

exertions from Lord John Russell’s recently formed Government, and the

plan resolved upon was explained in the Treasury Minute dated the 31st

August, 1846, which was published for general information[24].

The system of public works was renewed by the Act 9 & 10 Vic., c.

107, which was passed without any opposition in either House of

Parliament. In order to check the exorbitant demands which had been

made during the preceding season, the whole of the expense was made a

local charge, and the advances were directed to be repaid by a rate

levied according to the Poor Law valuation, which makes the landlords

liable for the whole rate on tenements under 4ℓ. yearly value, and for

a proportion, generally amounting to one-half, on tenements above

that value, instead of according to the grand jury cess (the basis of

the repayments under the preceding Act), which lays the whole burden

upon the occupier. It was also determined that the wages given on the

Relief Works should be somewhat below the average rate of wages in the

district; that the persons employed, should, as far as possible, be

paid by task or in proportion to the work actually done by them; and

that the Relief Committees, instead of giving tickets entitling persons

to employment on the public works, should furnish lists of persons

requiring relief, which should be carefully revised by the officers of

the Board of Works; the experience of the preceding season having shown

that these precautions were necessary to confine the Relief Works to

the destitute, and to enforce a reasonable quantum of work.

The question which the Government had to decide, in regard to the

renewal of the Commissariat operations, was of the most momentous kind.

After all that had taken place during the last few months, it could not

be expected that private trade would return, as a matter of course,

to its accustomed channels. Neither the wholesale dealers in towns,

nor the retail dealers in the rural districts, would lay in even their

usual stocks of food; still less would they make the extraordinary

provision required to meet the coming emergency, while they had before

them the prospect of the Government throwing into the market supplies

of food of unknown extent, which might make their outlay so much loss

to them. The Government could not, therefore, calculate, as it did on

the former occasion, on finding the private trade, by means of which

the people are ordinarily supplied with food, proceeding as usual, and

on being able to add more or less, at its discretion, to the resources

which that trade afforded. Mercantile confidence in this branch of

business was, for the time, destroyed. The trade was paralysed; and

if this state of things had been suffered to continue, the general

expectation of the Government again interfering would inevitably have

created a necessity for that interference, on a scale which it would

have been quite beyond the power of the Government to support.

Under these circumstances it was announced,--1st. That no orders

for supplies of food would be sent by the Government to foreign

countries. 2ndly. That the interference of the Government would be

confined to those western districts of Ireland in which, owing to the

former prevalence of potato cultivation, no trade in corn for local

consumption existed. And 3rdly. That even in these districts, the

Government depôts would not be opened for the sale of food, while it

could be obtained from private dealers at reasonable prices, with

reference to those which prevailed at the nearest large marts. It was

also determined to adhere to the rule acted upon during the preceding

season, not to make any purchases in the local markets of Ireland,

where the appearance of the Government as a buyer must have had the

effect of keeping up prices and encouraging interested representations;

and a promise was given that every practicable effort would be made to

protect the supplies of food introduced by private traders, both while

they were in transit and when they were stored for future consumption.

The Relief Committees of the preceding season were re-organised;

the rules under which they had acted were carefully revised; and

inspecting officers were appointed to superintend their proceedings,

and keep the Government informed of the progress of events. A large

proportion of the people of Ireland had been accustomed to grow the

food they required, each for himself, on his own little plot of ground;

and the social machinery by which, in other countries, the necessary

supplies of food are collected, stored, and distributed, had no

existence there. Suddenly, without any preparation, the people passed

from a potato food, which they raised themselves, to a grain food,

which they had to purchase from others, and which, in great part, had

to be imported from abroad; and the country was so entirely destitute

of the resources applicable to this new state of things, that often,

even in large villages, neither bread nor flour was to be procured; and

in country districts, the people had sometimes to walk twenty miles

before they could obtain a single stone of meal. The main object for

which the Relief Committees were established, therefore, was to provide

a temporary substitute for the operations of the corn-factor, miller,

baker, and provision-dealer, and to allow time and furnish the example

for a sounder and more permanent state of things; but they were not

precluded from giving gratuitous relief in cases of more than ordinary

destitution. The agency of Relief Committees was this season almost

universally substituted for the coast guard and constabulary depôts

with the object of drawing out the resources of the country before

the Government depôts were had recourse to, of inducing the upper and

middle classes to exert themselves, and of preventing a direct pressure

of the mass of the people upon the Government depôts, which in a time

of real famine it would have been very difficult to resist.

Such was the plan resolved upon for the campaign of 1846-7 against the

approaching famine, and we shall now show the result of the struggle.

It was hoped that a breathing-time would have been allowed at the

season of harvest, to enable the Board of Works to reorganize their

establishments on a scale proportioned to the magnitude of the task

about to devolve on them, and to prepare, through their district

officers, plans and estimates of suitable works for the assistance of

the baronial sessions. This interval was not obtained. The general

failure of the potato crop spread despondency and alarm from one end

of Ireland to the other, and induced every class of persons to throw

themselves upon the Government for aid. On the 6th of September, the

Lord Lieutenant ordered all the discontinued works under the 9 & 10

Vic., c. 1, to be recommenced, and sessions were rapidly held in all

the southern and western counties of Ireland, at which roads were

presented in the mass, under the 9 & 10 Vic., c. 107, the cost of

which, in some cases, much exceeded the annual rental of the barony.

The resident gentry and rate-payers, whose duty it was to ascertain,

as far as possible, the probable amount of destitution in their

neighbourhood, the sum required to relieve it, and the works upon

which that sum could best be expended, and who had the necessary local

knowledge, in almost every case devolved these functions upon the

Board of Works, who could only act on such information as they could

obtain from naval and military officers and engineers, most of whom

were selected from among strangers to the district, in order to prevent

undue influence being used. After that, to advance the funds; to select

the labourers; to superintend the work; to pay the people weekly;

to enforce proper performance of the labour; if the farm works were

interrupted, to ascertain the quantity of labour required for them;

to select and draft off the proper persons to perform it; to settle

the wages to be paid to them by the farmers, and see that they were

paid; to furnish food, not only for all the destitute out of doors,

but in some measure for the paupers in the workhouses, were the duties

which the Government and its officers were called upon to perform. The

proprietors and associated rate-payers having presented _indefinitely_,

said it was the fault of the Government and its officers if the people

were not instantly employed, and these officers were blamed, even by

persons of character and understanding, if they were not at once equal

to execute the duties which in this country are performed in their

respective districts by thousands of country gentlemen, magistrates,

guardians, overseers, surveyors, &c., resident throughout the country,

and trained by the experience of years to the performance of their

various functions. The Board of Works became the centre of a colossal

organization; 5,000 separate works had to be reported upon; 12,000

subordinate officers had to be superintended. Their letters averaged

upwards of 800 a-day, and the number received on each of the following

days was--

January 4th, 3,104

February 15th, 4,900

April 19th, 4,340

May 17th, 6,033[25]

The strain on the springs of society from this monstrous system of

centralisation was fearful in the extreme. The Government, which ought

only to mediate between the different classes of society, had now to

bear the immediate pressure of the millions, on the sensitive points

of wages and food. The opposition to task-work was general, and the

enforcement of it became a trial of strength between the Government and

the multitude. The officers of the Board were in numerous instances

the objects of murderous attacks, and it became necessary for the

preservation of the whole community, to have recourse to the painful

expedient of stopping the works whenever cases of insubordination or

outrage occurred.

Meanwhile, the number of persons employed on the works was rapidly on

the increase. The utmost exertions of two sets of inspecting officers,

one under the Board of Works, and the other under Sir R. Routh, were

insufficient to revise the lists; and the Lord Lieutenant in vain

directed that no person rated above 6ℓ. for the Poor Law cess, should,

except under very special circumstances, be eligible for employment.

Thousands upon thousands were pressed upon the officers of the Board

of Works in every part of Ireland, and it was impossible for those

officers to test the accuracy of the urgent representations which were

made to them. The attraction of money wages regularly paid from the

public purse, or the “Queen’s pay,” as it was popularly called, led to

a general abandonment of other descriptions of industry, in order to

participate in the advantages of the Relief Works. Landlords competed

with each other in getting the names of their tenants placed on the

lists; farmers dismissed their labourers and sent them to the works;

the clergy insisted on the claims of the members of their respective

congregations; the fisheries were deserted; and it was often difficult

even to get a coat patched or a pair of shoes mended, to such an extent

had the population of the south and west of Ireland turned out upon

the roads. The average number employed in October was 114,000; in

November, 285,000; in December, 440,000; and in January, 1847, 570,000.

It was impossible to exact from such multitudes a degree of labour

which would act as a test of destitution. Huddled together in masses,

they contributed to each other’s idleness, and there were no means of

knowing who did a fair proportion of work and who did not. The general

enforcement of the system of task work had justly been considered

necessary to stimulate the industry of the labourers on the Relief

Works, but when this point had been carried, after a hard struggle, the

old abuse reappeared in the aggravated form of an habitual collusion

between the labourers and the overseers who were appointed to measure

their work; so that the labourers, if they could be so called, were not

only as idle as ever, but were enabled withal to enjoy a rate of wages

which ought only to have been the reward of superior industry.

The plan of the Labour Rate Act (9 & 10 Vic., c. 107) was based on the

supposition that the great majority of the landlords and farmers would

make those exertions and submit to those sacrifices which the magnitude

of the crisis demanded, leaving only a manageable proportion of the

population to be supported by the Board of Works; and the Act would

probably have answered its object, if a larger, instead of a smaller

number of persons than usual had been employed in the cultivation and

improvement of the land, and the Relief Committees had put only those

who were really destitute upon the lists. Including the families of the

persons employed, upwards of two millions of people were maintained by

the Relief Works, but there were other multitudes behind, including

often the most helpless portion of the community, for whom no work

could be found. The Relief Works did not always furnish a subsistence

even for those who were employed on them. The wages, paid regularly in

money, were higher than any which had ever been given for agricultural

labour in Ireland, but at the existing prices of food they were

insufficient for the support of a family, melancholy proof of which was

afforded by daily instances of starvation in connexion with the Relief

Works[26]. The fearful extent to which the rural population had been

thrown for support upon the Board of Works also threatened a disastrous

neglect of the ordinary tillage. If the people were retained on the

works, their lands must remain uncultivated; if they were put off the

works, they must starve. A change of system had become inevitable,

and when Parliament met in the end of January, it was announced that

the Government intended to put an end to the Public Works, and to

substitute for them another mode of relief, which will be hereafter

described.

Meanwhile, the pressure on the Relief Works was continually on the

increase, and the persons daily employed, who in January had been

570,000, became in February 708,000, and in March amounted to the

enormous number of 734,000[27], representing, at a moderate estimate

of the average extent of each family, upwards of three millions of

persons. At last, the Government, seeing that the time suited for

agricultural operations was rapidly passing away, and that the utmost

exertions made on the spot had failed in keeping the numbers in check,

took the matter into its own hands, and directed that on the 20th

March, 20 per cent. of the persons employed should be struck off the

lists; after which, successive reductions were ordered, proportioned

to the progress made in bringing the new system of relief into

operation in each district. These orders were obeyed, and the crisis

passed without any disturbance of the public peace or any perceptible

aggravation of the distress. The necessary labour was returned to

agriculture, and the foundation was laid of the late abundant harvest

in Ireland, by which the downward progress of that country has been

mercifully stayed, and new strength and spirits have been given for

working out her regeneration. In the first week in April, the persons

employed on the Relief Works were reduced to 525,000; in the first

week in May to 419,000; in the first week in June to 101,000; and in

the week ending the 26th June to 28,000. The remaining expenditure

was limited to a sum of 200,000ℓ. for the month of May, and to the

rate of 100,000ℓ. a-month for June, July, and the first fifteen days

of August, when the Act expired. These sums were afterwards permitted

to be exceeded to a certain extent, but the object was attained of

putting a curb on this monstrous system and of bringing it gradually

and quietly to a close. Great exertions were made, and a heavy expense

was incurred, to leave the roads and other works in progress in a safe

and passable state as far as they had gone; but their completion must

depend upon the parties locally interested in them. From the first

commencement of the Relief Works in February 1846, repeated warnings

were given that the object was not the works themselves, but the relief

of the prevailing destitution through the employment afforded by them;

that the works would be closed as soon as they were no longer required

for that purpose; and that if the proprietors desired to complete them,

they might do so under the ordinary system of Government loans made on

the security of county presentments[28].

This system threw off a shoot, the history of which it is necessary to

trace. In order to impose some limits on what threatened to become a

gigantic system of permanently supporting one portion of the community

at the expense of the remainder, and of making provision out of the

taxes for classes of undertakings which properly belong to the economy

of private life, the application of the public money under the Labour

Rate Acts was strictly limited to works of a public character, which

were not likely to be undertaken except for the purpose of giving

relief. This condition was generally objected to in Ireland; and

although no disposition was evinced to take advantage of the loans

which the Government was ready to make under the General Improvement

and Drainage Acts, a great desire was expressed that the funds advanced

under the Labour Rate Act should be employed on what were called

reproductive works. The Lord Lieutenant, having obtained the sanction

of the Government, yielded to this general feeling, and authorized

presentments to be made for the drainage and subsoiling of the estates

of individuals, provided they consented to their estates being charged

with the repayment of the sums advanced. This was the arrangement which

acquired so much notoriety under the name of “Labouchere’s Letter,”

owing to its having been announced by the publication of a letter from

Mr. Labouchere, who then held the office of Secretary for Ireland, to

the Board of Works, dated 5th October, 1846; but the result did not

answer the expectations which had been formed. The aggregate amount

presented “under the Letter,” was 380,607ℓ., of which presentments were

acted on to the gross amount of 239,476ℓ. The sum actually expended

was about 180,000ℓ.; and the largest number of persons at any one time

employed was 26,961 in the month of May, 1847. Some incidental good

was done by the example of the advantages of thorough draining, and of

the proper mode of executing it; but, as a remedy for the wide-spread

calamity, the plan totally failed.

Upon this, a two-fold agitation sprang up. Some landed proprietors

required that their liability should be confined to the relief of the

destitute on their own estates; while others demanded that, instead of

being employed on the roads, the people should be paid for working on

their own farms. Both these movements were steadily resisted by the

Government. The objection to the first was, that if the inhabitants

of the pauperised districts had been separated from the rest in the

administration of the measures of relief, they must either have starved

or have become entirely dependent on the Consolidated Fund; while,

if the other plan had been adopted, the entire cost of carrying on

the agriculture of the country would have been transferred to the

Government, without its being possible either to test the applications

for assistance, or to enforce a proper amount of exertion. This last

scheme was most clamorously urged in the county of Clare, and it may

be considered as the masterpiece of that system of social economy

according to which the machine of society should be worked backwards,

and the Government should be made to support the people, instead of

the people the Government. The Government was also to provide tools

and seed as well as wages, but the rent was to be received by the same

parties as before.

Baronial presentments were authorized for the construction of railway

earthworks, as relief works under the 9 & 10 Vic., c. 107, subject

to the conditions required for the fulfilment of the object of the

Act[29]; but advantage was taken of this permission only in two

baronies of the county of Cork, where the Waterford and Limerick

Railway was aided from this source.

The silver currency which had previously sufficed for a people who

lived upon potatoes grown by themselves, and paid their rent by so many

days’ labour, fell short of what was required to pay the labourers

employed on the numerous Relief Works carried on simultaneously in

different parts of the country, and a large supply was therefore

distributed, by means of a Government steamer, among the principal

towns on the coast of Ireland. On the cessation of the Relief Works,

the greater part of this coin accumulated in the banks, which were

relieved by the transmission of the surplus to the Cape of Good Hope to

aid in carrying on the Caffre war.

In the Commissariat branch of the operations, every pledge which

had been given was strictly adhered to, and confidence having been

re-established, prodigious efforts were made by the mercantile

community to provide against the approaching scarcity. The whole world

was ransacked for supplies; Indian corn, the taste for which had by

this time taken root in Ireland, rose to a higher price than wheat;

and the London and Liverpool markets were again and again swept by

the enterprising operations of the Irish dealers, who, from an early

period, appreciated the full extent of the calamity, and acted upon the

principle that the gulf which had opened in Ireland would swallow all

that could be thrown into it, and remain still unsatisfied. In February

1847, the beneficial effect of these measures began to be apparent. On

the 24th of that month, Mr. N. Cummins, a respectable merchant of Cork,

wrote as follows to Mr. Trevelyan:

“From this gloomy picture I turn to the supply of food, and

am happy to say that in this quarter the importations, both

direct and from England, during the past month, have been very

large; heavy cargoes of maize continue almost daily to arrive,

and I feel persuaded that the stocks of bread stuffs generally

are accumulating here to a much larger amount than some of

our dealers would have it believed. Prices cannot, however, be

quoted at more than a turn below the extreme point yet; they

stand as follows,--say Indian corn, by retail, 17ℓ. 15s. and

18ℓ. per ton; Indian meal to 19ℓ.; oatmeal, 25ℓ.; wheaten meal,

19ℓ. to 20ℓ. per ton.”

The Irish Crisis · 第 1 / 18 题