CHAPTER VII

Compagnie Générale des Omnibus de Londres formed--The London General

Omnibus Company starts work--Businesses purchased by the Company--It

offers a prize of £100 for the best design of an omnibus--The

knife-board omnibus introduced--Correspondence system tried--Packets

of tickets sold--Yellow wheels--The L.G.O.C. becomes an English

Limited Liability Company--The first board of directors--Present

position of the Company--The Omnibus: a satire--The Omnibus: a play.

In 1855 the most important event in the history of English omnibuses

occurred, for on December 4 of that year a “Société en Commandite”

was established in Paris with the title of the “Compagnie Générale

des Omnibus de Londres,” for the purpose of running omnibuses in

London and its suburbs. The directors of this Society, or Company,

were sufficiently astute to refrain from making it known to the London

public that the enterprise was a French one. They chose an English

name for public use, and the earliest notices of their contemplated

operations were headed the “London Omnibus Company.” Apparently they

were unaware that a company of that name had existed and come to a

disappointing end, but doubtless this was intimated to them, for the

name was changed speedily--before they started work--to the “London

General Omnibus Company.” Moreover, as the first managers of the

company were well-known London omnibus proprietors, there was nothing

to make the public suspect that the company was not an English one.

Monday, January 7, 1856, was the day selected by the London

General Omnibus Company for taking over and beginning to work the

old-established businesses which they had purchased. On that morning

Wilson’s Islington and Holloway “Favorites” came out of the yards with

“London General Omnibus Company” painted on them. The company could

not possibly have started work under more auspicious circumstances,

for Mr. Wilson was the largest omnibus proprietor in London, and his

vehicles, which were known all over the Metropolis, had the reputation

of being exceedingly well conducted. The property which Wilson sold

to the Company consisted of fifty omnibuses and five hundred horses,

and his employees, numbering about one hundred and eighty men, passed

into the service of the new Company. On the same day Mr. Leonard

Willing and his partners--the former the oldest omnibus proprietor in

London--transferred to the Company the Stoke Newington, Kingsland and

Dalston lines, consisting of twenty-two omnibuses, two hundred horses,

and seventy men.

In a few days several other lines passed into the hands of the Company,

making it the owner of one hundred and ninety-eight vehicles and

nineteen hundred and forty horses, and the employer of six hundred

and seventy men. Of the vehicles purchased seven were four-horse

mails, five running to Woodford and two to Barnet. The Company had

hoped to start work with five hundred omnibuses, but many of the

well-established proprietors could not be persuaded to sell their

businesses, and consequently the London General Omnibus Company had to

be content, for a time, with three hundred.

The proprietors who did dispose of their businesses, and retired

altogether from omnibus proprietorship were: Messrs. Bennet, Breach,

Chancellor, Clark, Forge, Fox, Hartley, Hawtrey, Hinckley, Horne, Hunt,

Johnson, Kerrison, Macnamara, Martin, Proome, Roads, Seale, Smith,

Webb, Westropp, Williams, Willing, Wilson, and Woodford.

One of the Company’s first concerns was to obtain an improved omnibus,

and with that end in view the directors offered a prize of £100 for the

best plan of one suited to their requirements. There were seventy-four

competitors, and the results of their efforts were displayed, in

February, 1856, at the Company’s office, 454, Strand. The two best

plans were sent in respectively by Mr. R. F. Miller and Mr. Wilson, but

the judges, Messrs. George Godwin, Joseph Wright, and Charles Manby,

were by no means pleased with the work submitted to them, and reported

to the directors:--

“We have first to express our regret that although many of the

propositions display considerable ingenuity and offer here and there

improvements, we do not find any one design of supereminent merit, or

calculated in its present shape to afford that increased amount of

comfort and accommodation your company, with praiseworthy foresight,

desires to give the public, and which, moreover, will doubtless be

looked for at your hands.

“Inasmuch, however, as we are required to select one of the designs

as the best of those submitted, considered with regard to your

stipulations and wants, we beg leave to point out the design No. 64

sent in by Mr. Miller, of Hammersmith. Inquiry of Mr. Miller, and the

examination of a full-sized omnibus built by him (after arriving at

this determination) have shown us that if his intentions were more

completely expressed in his drawing than is the case, the design would

be more worthy of the premium.

“We must repeat that we find no design that we can recommend for

adoption intact, or which, to speak truly, is worth the premium

offered; but there are points about some of them which, being combined,

would aid in producing what you and the public desire--a light,

commodious, and well-ventilated omnibus.

“GEORGE GODWIN,

“JOSEPH WRIGHT,

“CHARLES MANBY.”

Mr. Miller was awarded the prize, but the directors, acting on the

advice contained in the judges’ report, had their new omnibuses

built from a design which combined the best suggestions of several

competitors.

In 1857 further improvements were made in the construction of

omnibuses, the most important being the placing of five more seats on

the roof, thereby making accommodation for fourteen outside passengers.

These seats were placed on the near side, and made the “knife-board”

omnibus, which has now almost entirely disappeared from London streets,

but may be found passing the eventide of its existence in sleepy

country towns and populous watering-places.

Before the London General Omnibus Company was a year old it introduced

the system of “correspondence,” which in Paris had proved profitable to

the proprietors and convenient to the public. It was the Company’s idea

that a passenger might be able to travel from any part of London to

another for sixpence. The passenger would get into the omnibus starting

from the neighbourhood in which he resided and ride in it until another

of the Company’s omnibuses, going in the direction he wished to travel,

crossed the road, when he would change into it. By that arrangement

people were able to ride from Bow to Hammersmith or from Starch Green

to Peckham for sixpence--a tremendous ride for the price, and cheaper

than it is at the present day.

The London General Omnibus Company was now increasing rapidly, by

purchase and by starting new lines, the number of its omnibuses,

and in November, 1857, when the “correspondence” system was at its

height, it possessed five hundred and ninety-five on the roads. For

these omnibuses, with horses, harness, and good will, the Company

paid £400,000--nearly £700 per omnibus. With an increased number of

omnibuses the advantages of “corresponding” became greater, and upwards

of four thousand people daily showed their appreciation of the system

by “corresponding” at the Company’s offices opened for that purpose in

Oxford Circus, Cheapside, and Bishopsgate. “The system is only in its

infancy,” the directors declared at that period, and promised that it

would be improved greatly. Difficulties, however, arose in the working

of the system, which, after a time, was discontinued, never to be tried

again.

While the London General Omnibus Company was giving the

“correspondence” system a trial, it was making other attempts to win

the favour of the public. On the first day of 1857 it began the sale

of packets of omnibus tickets, allowing a reduction of ten per cent, on

every purchase of £1, and so greatly was this innovation appreciated

that on the inauguration day ten thousand tickets were sold at the

Company’s Strand office alone. Later the sales increased considerably,

and many linen-drapers in a large way of business purchased thousands

of tickets at a time, and retailed them to their customers at a reduced

rate. To ladies whose purchases reached a certain sum they presented

tickets free of charge.

Evidently the directors found, after a time, that the practice

of selling tickets was not sufficiently remunerative, for it was

discontinued. The directors were astute men of business, and while they

neglected nothing that would conduce to the efficiency of their service

and the comfort of their patrons, they made a number of alterations

which reduced to a considerable extent the working expenses of their

omnibuses. One of these alterations caused a complete revolution in

the colour of omnibus wheels. When the Company started work, omnibus

wheels were painted the same colour as the body of the vehicles, and

consequently it was necessary to keep a stock of red, blue, green,

brown, white, yellow, and chocolate wheels. The directors, however,

soon came to the conclusion that if all the wheels were painted one

colour it would not be necessary to keep so large a stock in reserve.

Therefore they had the wheels of all their omnibuses painted yellow,

and the other proprietors, seeing the convenience and saving to be

derived from such an arrangement, followed their example, and to-day

nearly every omnibus in London, with the exception of those belonging

to the railway companies, has yellow wheels.

In the autumn of 1858 it was decided to convert the “Compagnie

Générale des Omnibus de Londres” into an English Limited Liability

Company, and for that purpose the French Society was dissolved and

the London General Omnibus Company, Limited, started to take over

its property, good will, existing engagements and liabilities. The

latter was registered on November 16, 1858, as a Limited Liability

Company, with a nominal capital of £700,000, divided into 175,000

shares of £4 each. The head office of the Company was, of course, in

London--454, Strand--but a branch office was opened in Paris, where

French shareholders could obtain any information which they required,

and where a duplicate transfer-book was kept for the registering of

transfers of shares held in France. The number of directors was to be

not more than twelve nor less than nine, and at least four of them were

to be Frenchmen. The first Board of Directors of the London General

Omnibus Company, Limited, was constituted as follows:--

Anthony Nicholas Armani, Esq.

M. Felix Carteret.

Edwin Chadwick, Esq., C.B.

William Halliday Cosway, Esq.

William Stratford Dugdale, Esq.

M. le Comte de Lantivy.

Arthur Macnamara, Esq.

William Sheldon, Esq.

Reginald Thornton, Esq.

M. François Frederic Toché.

M. Antoine Vacossin.

James Willing, Esq.

In his early days Mr. Willing was a man of many businesses. Among other

things he was the owner of several toll-gates, the proprietor of many

omnibuses, and an advertising contractor. One day he would be found

standing at a toll-gate, collecting money from passing vehicles, and

the following one he would be seen driving an omnibus. While acting

as a ’bus driver he was able to keep a sharp eye on his advertising

business, and was frequently annoyed to see that his bills, which were

being posted as he drove Citywards, were covered by other people’s

bills when he returned an hour or two later. To put a stop to that

annoyance he started the protected hoardings, which are now so numerous

throughout the land.

At the present time there are only two French directors of the London

General Omnibus Company, the number of shareholders resident in France

having decreased to seven hundred. The office in Paris is still

maintained. The number of English shareholders is seventeen hundred.

From the day that the London General Omnibus Company became an English

concern, it has enjoyed almost unbroken prosperity. During the

half-year ending June 30, 1901, 101,109,572 passengers were carried

by its 1373 omnibuses, which ran 15,965,602 miles. The number of

horses which it possessed was 16,714. The oats, maize, beans, and peas

consumed by the company’s horses in six months weighed 25,299 tons.

The Company builds its own omnibuses at its works at Highbury. Its

stables are dotted all over London, and some of the newly erected ones

are enormous places. Those at Dollis Hill, which accommodate over six

hundred horses, are at present surrounded by fields, and so far away

from public-houses and other delights of London civilization, that the

’busmen, in disgust, have named it “Klondyke.”

From “Klondyke” and many other omnibus stables, a large number of

horses have been sent to the seat of war in South Africa. Some time

ago the Government made an arrangement with various omnibus companies

for the purchase of a certain number of horses in time of war. For

each horse the Government pays, in time of peace, 10_s._ per annum.

The average price paid for each horse claimed for active service was

£60. The horses taken were well seasoned and accustomed to hard work.

The sudden requisitioning of many hundreds of their best animals

caused the various omnibus companies considerable inconvenience. The

daily journeys of many of their omnibuses were reduced in number, and

coachmen and conductors were consequently unable to earn their usual

wages.

[Illustration: RICHMOND CONVEYANCE COMPANY OMNIBUS.]

Two years after the formation of the London General Omnibus Company

there were about 1200 omnibuses in London, only a small proportion

of which worked on Sundays. On the majority of roads they ran on

week-days at intervals of five minutes, the fares being, in most

cases, from twopence to ninepence. Many of the omnibus lines in

existence at that time have been altered or curtailed in consequence

of railway competition. Among these are the following long-distance

routes:--Stratford and Oxford Street, Brentford and St. Paul’s,

Greenwich and Charing Cross, Richmond, Kew and Bank, Finchley and

Bank, Angel and Hampton Court. The Richmond Conveyance Company had

some excellent omnibuses, which ran from Richmond to the Bank, _viâ_

Mortlake, Barnes, Hammersmith, and Piccadilly. They were built by Mr.

H. Gray of Blackfriars.

[Illustration: RICHMOND CONVEYANCE COMPANY OMNIBUS. END VIEW.]

In the early sixties it began to be recognized that, for men, the best

way to see London was from the top of an omnibus. An anonymous poet

published, in 1865, a satire on life seen from an omnibus roof. It was

entitled “The Omnibus.” Here are a few lines from it--

“August four-wheeler! Rolling Paradise!

Thou Juggernaut to dawdling men and mice!

Thou blissful refuge to the footsore cit!

Thou boast of science and inventive wit!

To thee, in pride careering o’er the stones,

The homeward labourer drags his weary bones.

The burdened porter, staggering on the road,

Climbs up thy hulk and there forgets his load.

For thee the merchant his dull desk forsakes,

And leaves Cornhill to night, and thieves, and rakes.

The lover finds thee pensioner of bliss,--

By thee he speeds to reap the promised kiss.

On thy ‘outside,’ no muff can plead his qualms,

And us forbid to colour our meerschaums;

Thy ramparts hold we by an ancient lease,

And there unchallenged, smoke the pipe of peace.

All hail! thou kindest gift of human sense!

Thou envy of the wretch--who lacks three-pence!

All hail! thou huge, earth-born leviathan!

Thou rattling, rambling, two-horse caravan!

Thou dry-land ship, breasting in scorn the waves

Of traffic’s whirlpool that round Cheapside raves.

Behind thee, competition lies,

And jealousy but breathes a curse and dies.

Poor Francis Train just hissed at thee his spite,

Then, with his ‘Tramways’ sank in endless night;

And jobbing railways, near thy presence found,

Smitten with shame, hide, fuming ‘Under-ground.’

Though trampled curs may curse thee with a bark,

And godless cabmen call thee--‘Noah’s Ark;’

Majestic vehicle! much slandered friend,

To lowest Tophet we their libels send,

And chaunt thy praises to the City’s end.

An eighth world-wonder thine arrival bodes,

Thou greatest, best, Colossus of our roads.”

Some years prior to the publication of the above satire, a farcical

comedy, entitled “The Omnibus,” had been produced at the Theatre Royal,

Covent Garden. A man and his wife, seeking rural quietude, take a

house in a charming suburb, only to find that omnibuses run to it from

London. Nearly every omnibus brings them a load of visitors, who drive

the poor man to distraction.

Omnibuses and cabs · 第 7 / 13 章