CHAPTER II

George Shillibeer introduces omnibuses into England--The first omnibus

route--Shillibeer’s conductors defraud him--His plans for preventing

fraud--An omnibus library--Shopkeepers complain of omnibus obstruction.

Laffitte’s omnibuses were so exceedingly well managed that they

continued to prosper in spite of the many new lines started in

opposition to them. With a view to maintaining the superiority of

his omnibuses over those of his rivals, Laffitte decided to have two

vehicles built which should eclipse in comfort and appearance any

others on the streets. He gave the order to Mr. George Shillibeer, a

well-known Parisian coach-builder. Shillibeer had been a midshipman

in the British Navy, but quitted the service and went to Hatchett’s,

in Long Acre, to learn coach-building. Later, he started business for

himself in Paris, and as English carriages were then becoming very

fashionable, he met with considerable success, and built carriages and

coaches for the most influential men of the day.

While executing Laffitte’s order it occurred to Shillibeer that he

might, with considerable advantage to himself, start omnibuses in

London. He decided to do so, and, disposing of his business, returned

to London and took premises at Bury Street, Bloomsbury, whence he made

it known that he was about to introduce “a new vehicle called the

omnibus.” The word “omnibus” was received with marked disapproval by

every person to whom Shillibeer spoke concerning his new venture. “If

one vehicle is to be called an omnibus, what are two or more to be

called?” people said to him.

“Omnibuses,” Shillibeer replied promptly, but his questioners

were horrified, and to their dying days preferred to call them

“Shillibeers.” Some people called them “omnis,” and Mr. Joseph Hume,

speaking years later in the House of Commons, created much laughter by

referring seriously to the vehicles as “omnibi.”

The route which Shillibeer chose for his first omnibus was from the

Yorkshire Stingo at Paddington, along the New Road to the Bank. The New

Road was the name by which Marylebone, Euston and Pentonville Roads

were then known.

Three or four short-stage-coaches had been running on that road for

many years, but as they took three hours to get from Paddington to the

City, and charged two shillings for outside seats and three shillings

for inside ones, they were not patronised by able-bodied people, who

usually preferred to walk. Moreover, the short-stage-coaches were

uncomfortably loaded with luggage, which they collected and delivered

every journey.

On the morning of July 4, 1829, Shillibeer’s two new omnibuses began

to run. A large crowd assembled to witness the start, and general

admiration was expressed at the smart appearance of the vehicles, which

were built to carry twenty-two passengers, all inside, and were drawn

by three beautiful bays, harnessed abreast. The word “Omnibus” was

painted in large letters on both sides of the vehicles. The fare from

the Yorkshire Stingo to the Bank was one shilling; half way, sixpence.

Newspapers and magazines were provided free of charge. The conductors,

too, came in for considerable notice, for it had become known that they

were both the sons of British naval officers--friends of Shillibeer.

These amateur conductors had resided for some years in Paris, and

were, therefore, well acquainted with the duties of the position which

they assumed. The idea of being the first omnibus conductors in England

pleased them greatly, and prompted them to work their hardest to make

Shillibeer’s venture a success. They were attired in smart blue-cloth

uniforms, cut like a midshipman’s; they spoke French fluently, and

their politeness to passengers was a pleasing contrast to the rudeness

of the short-stage-coach guards--a most ill-mannered class of men.

[Illustration: SHILLIBEER’S FIRST OMNIBUS.]

Each omnibus made twelve journeys a day, and was generally full.

So great a success were they that the takings averaged a hundred

pounds a week. Nevertheless, Shillibeer had much to contend with. The

short-stage-coach proprietors, disliking competition, endeavoured to

incite the populace against Shillibeer by declaring that he was a

Frenchman, and ought not to be allowed to run his foreign vehicles

in England. Moreover, the aristocratic and wealthy residents of

Paddington Green objected strongly to the omnibuses coming into

their select neighbourhood, and petitioned the local authorities to

prevent their doing so. And when they found that their endeavours

were futile, they declared solemnly that Paddington Green was doomed.

If they saw the neighbourhood to-day, they would consider, no doubt,

that their prophecy was fulfilled, although, as a matter of fact,

it was railways and not omnibuses that, from a residential point of

view, ruined the neighbourhood. But the threatened doom of Paddington

Green did not deter the sentimental poke-bonneted young ladies, who

resided in the charming suburb, from spending a considerable amount

of their time in watching the omnibuses start. In the middle of the

day many of them were in the habit of taking a ride to King’s Cross

and back, for the sole purpose of improving their French by conversing

with the conductors. That praiseworthy amusement was short-lived,

however, for as soon as the omnibuses were in good working order, the

gentlemen-conductors relinquished their posts and were succeeded by

paid officials.

The new conductors were dressed in dark velvet suits, and as far as

politeness was concerned were all that could be desired. Unfortunately

they became possessed of the belief, not yet quite extinct, that to

rob an omnibus proprietor was no sin. The amount of money handed in

to Shillibeer grew less daily--a very suspicious decrease, considering

that people living on the road which the omnibuses travelled declared

that the vehicles were as well patronised as ever. Shillibeer therefore

made arrangements with various trustworthy people to ride in his

omnibuses, as ordinary passengers, and check the number of people

carried and the amount of fares which they paid. For a few days every

journey that the omnibuses made there was a male or female passenger

watching the conductors, and from their reports Shillibeer discovered

that the two men were, between them, robbing him to the extent of £20 a

week. This was corroborated by the conductors themselves, whose style

of living had become decidedly luxurious. In their time of affluence

they did not forget their poorer friends, and one night, after work

was finished, they treated a number of them to a champagne supper at

the Yorkshire Stingo. The whole party became hilariously drunk, and

while in that condition the hosts threw discretion to the winds, and

bragged loudly that they made £10 each a week out of the omnibuses, in

excess of their pay. Among their guests were detectives employed by

Shillibeer, who repeated the confession of fraud to their employer,

with the result that the first professional omnibus conductors were

discharged. Shillibeer’s leniency, due to his anxiety not to have his

omnibuses mixed up in any scandal, encouraged succeeding conductors to

steal. Shillibeer was at his wits’ end what to do, when a man called on

him with a patent register guaranteed to put a stop to the conductors’

pilferings. The register was designed to be placed underneath the

omnibus, and people entering or leaving the vehicle trod on a plate

fixed in the step, the register recording every person who stepped upon

it. Shillibeer liked the idea, and bought one of the registers on the

condition that the inventor acted as conductor until its reliability

had been proved thoroughly.

For two weeks everything went well, and the conductor was anticipating

an order for a second register, when a gang of men, in sympathy

with the discharged conductors, attacked the omnibus while it was

standing outside the Yorkshire Stingo, smashed the patent register

with sledge-hammers, and half murdered its inventor. Shillibeer, who

had paid £300 for the demolished register, did not order another one

to be made, but tried a new and less expensive check, which was in

use in the Paris omnibuses. A specially made clock was fixed in a

prominent position in each omnibus, with a notice beneath it informing

the public that it was the conductor’s duty to move the hand a certain

distance whenever a passenger entered, and requesting that any neglect

of that duty should be reported to the proprietor. But, in spite of

that appeal, the conductors neglected persistently to act according

to instructions, and not one report of their breach of duty was ever

received by Shillibeer from an ordinary passenger. Some of them,

indeed, amused themselves by turning the hand round until the register

showed that the omnibus had carried an impossible number of people.

This amusement was getting very popular when Shillibeer put an end to

it by removing the clocks and trusting to his conductors’ honour--a

confidence which was proved, time after time, to be entirely misplaced.

[Illustration: SHILLIBEER’S THIRD OMNIBUS.]

But, in spite of all obstacles, Shillibeer prospered, and in less than

nine months had twelve omnibuses at work. A few of these were two-horse

omnibuses carrying twelve passengers inside and two outside. Some ran

from Paddington to the Bank, _viâ_ Oxford Street and Holborn. On all

these new vehicles “Shillibeer” was painted in large letters on the

sides, instead of “Omnibus.”

The Post Office authorities were the first to copy Shillibeer’s

vehicles. They had four built, resembling the originals in every

respect save the painting and lettering. On September 23, 1829, these

vehicles--accelerators they were called--started at half-past eight in

the morning from the back of the General Post Office for the western

and north-western districts. Each accelerator carried twelve or

thirteen letter-carriers, who were put down at various points to begin

their delivery.

A little later, Shillibeer’s brother-in-law started some omnibuses

which ran along the Caledonian Road, and were known as “Caledonians.”

These, too, were successful, and many years later became the property

of Mr. Wilson, the once famous Islington omnibus proprietor. Wilson’s

“Favorites” were known to every Londoner, and the “Caledonians” were

merged into them. At the present day the “Favorites” belong to the

London General Omnibus Company, Limited, and on their way from the

Nag’s Head, Holloway, to West Kensington and Fulham traverse their

original road.

In 1832, wishing to still further increase the number of his

omnibuses, Shillibeer took into partnership Mr. William Morton, a

Southwell publican, who sold his business to join him. The partnership

was dissolved in January, 1834, Morton taking as his share of the

business the whole of the New Road omnibuses. He failed, however, to

make them pay, and sold them at a great loss. Eventually he became

so reduced in circumstances that he applied for, and obtained, a

position as an omnibus conductor, but was discharged for drunkenness,

and, in a fit of despondency, committed suicide at his lodgings in

Little Carlisle Street, Edgware Road. At the inquest, Shillibeer’s

enemies--of whom he had a large number among short-stage-coach

proprietors--endeavoured to prove that the deceased had been swindled

over his omnibus partnership. But these charges were shown to be the

outcome of jealousy and petty spite, and it was proved that, in giving

over the New Road omnibuses to his late partner, Shillibeer had behaved

with great generosity, for that was the only line on which there was

no opposition. The omnibuses were paying excellently at the time of

the dissolution of partnership, but Morton mismanaged them. The person

to whom he sold them soon made them as remunerative as they had been

under Shillibeer’s management. In fact, the New Road route was the best

patronised, and, in 1837, there were fifty-four omnibuses on that road.

The fares were then sixpence any distance.

In the same year that Shillibeer took Morton into partnership, there

were several lines of omnibuses running in opposition to him, for the

old short-stage-coach proprietors were now alive to the fact that there

was much money to be made out of omnibuses; but the original vehicles

had the reputation of being excellently conducted, and, consequently,

were preferred by the public. Aware of this, the proprietors of some

opposition omnibuses had the impudence to paint on the panels of their

vehicles the word “Shillibeer.” Shillibeer then named his omnibuses

“Shillibeer’s Original Omnibuses.”

Some of the opposition proprietors, however, were men of sufficient

enterprise to object to remaining mere imitators of Shillibeer, and

tried their hardest to make their omnibuses more attractive than those

of their great rival. One man made all his coachmen wear a wooden ring

on each arm with strings attached to them which ran along each side

of the roof of the omnibus and out at the back to the conductor. The

passenger would then pull the cord or tell the conductor which side he

wished to be put down, and if it were the near side the left string

would be pulled; but if the passenger desired to get out on the off

side the conductor would pull the right string, and the coachman would

drive across the road and come to a standstill on what is now the

wrong side of the road. It seems strange that such a proceeding should

have been allowed in London, but the arrangement was very popular with

passengers, who grumbled and wrote letters to the proprietors if the

strings were absent or defective. Very soon after the introduction of

such strings there were few omnibuses in London without them, and they

remained in fashion for many years.

Many omnibuses had clocks fixed in them for the convenience of

passengers, and to ensure conductor and coachman keeping their time.

Bells did not come into use until many years later. When a conductor

wanted his coachman to stop he usually shouted to him. When he wished

him to go on he shouted again or banged the door.

Mr. Cloud, who ran omnibuses from the White Horse, Haymarket, to

Chelsea and Hammersmith--fares one shilling and half a crown--eclipsed

Shillibeer in one respect. Shillibeer supplied his patrons with

newspapers and magazines; Cloud provided his with books by well-known

authors. A little bookcase, well filled, was fixed in each of his

omnibuses at the end near the horses. Books were expensive in those

days, and many people rode to Hammersmith and back for the sole purpose

of reading a particular one which they knew to be in the omnibus

library. But this admirable innovation was abused shamefully by the

passengers, who appeared to consider it no sin to purloin the volumes.

Disgusted at the dishonesty of his patrons, Mr. Cloud announced

publicly that, in consequence of the thefts, his libraries would be

discontinued. The bookcases were removed, and in place of each a seat

was fixed, thereby enabling the omnibus to accommodate thirteen inside

passengers instead of twelve. Other omnibus proprietors decided that

their vehicles should also carry thirteen passengers, but provided no

additional accommodation. A conductor would tell a person that there

was room inside, but when the passenger entered he would find the six

seats on either side occupied. If he happened to be a stout party,

the burning question was on which side ought he to sit. The matter was

generally settled by the new-comer flopping down on some one’s lap.

Then a quarrel would ensue. As late as 1882 an omnibus with a seat in

front of the fareboard was running from Oxford Circus to Hendon, _viâ_

Kilburn. It was a most uncomfortable seat, but, nevertheless, it was

nearly always occupied, for the conductor, being a very amusing fellow,

had a knack of quickly soothing passengers who protested against

sitting on a small, cramped seat.

Soon after the removal of the bookcases, some of the Hammersmith

omnibuses acquired the habit of loitering, and thereby obstructing

the streets. By Act of Parliament, the police had the power to take

into custody the driver of any public vehicle who obstructed the high

road and refused to move on. One morning they exercised their power

by pulling two omnibus-drivers from their boxes and taking them to

the police-station. The following day the drivers were fined forty

shillings or a month’s imprisonment. For a few days there was no

loitering on the Hammersmith Road. But one Saturday evening an omnibus

pulled up at Knightsbridge in such a position as to obstruct the

traffic. A policeman shouted fiercely to the driver to move on, but

the coachman calmly shook his head and would not budge an inch. Two

policemen promptly rushed forward to pull him from his seat and take

him into custody, but, to their astonishment, found that he was chained

to the box and the chain fastened by a huge padlock. Their attempts

to remove him were useless. Then several other omnibuses came along,

and pulled up close to the first one. The drivers of these were also

chained to their boxes, and amused themselves and the crowd by chaffing

the police and shaking their chains at them. After remaining at

Knightsbridge for some considerable time, they drove away in triumph,

only, however, to be fined a few days later.

About this time shopkeepers began to complain that omnibuses prevented

their customers driving up to their doors in their carriages, and Mr.

Shufflebotham, a silk mercer of Ludgate Hill, championing their cause,

applied for summonses against twenty-four conductors for loitering.

Under an old Act of Parliament, any stage-coach driver taking up or

setting down passengers in the streets was liable to a penalty of not

less than £5. All the conductors were fined, but public opinion was by

no means favourable to the shopkeepers, and further attempts to prove

that private carriages had a greater right to the public streets than

omnibuses failed completely. On one occasion an alderman had before him

a hundred and twenty conductors charged with the fearful offence--in

tradesmen’s eyes--of stopping their omnibuses a few moments in front

of a shop when a carriage was waiting to pull up there. The alderman

discharged every one of the defendants, and his action was so popular

that, until a year or two ago, no one had the impudence to suggest that

the days of class legislation should be restored--that omnibuses which

carry twenty-six passengers should be turned out of the main streets to

make room for private carriages with their burden of four.

On January 7, 1832, a new Stage-Coach Act came into force. It had been

passed specially to permit omnibuses and short-stage-coaches to take up

and set down passengers in the streets.

Omnibuses and cabs · 第 2 / 13 章