CHAPTER IV

THE CATHEDRAL: THE MURDER OF BECKET

It is by the south porch that the Cathedral is entered. Let none

suppose this to be the veritable Cathedral that Becket knew; that

was replaced, piece by piece, in the succeeding centuries, all save

the Norman transept where he met his fate. The nave, by whose lofty,

aspiring perspective we advance, was built in 1380 upon the site of

that of the twelfth century. According to the testimony of the time, it

was in a ruinous condition. Conceive, if you can, the likelihood of one

of those particularly massive Norman naves like those of Tewkesbury and

Gloucester, which this resembled, becoming ruinous! The more probable

truth of the matter is that the feeling of the time had grown inimical

to those cavernous interiors of the older architects, and sought

any excuse for tearing them down and building in their stead in the

lightsome character of the Perpendicular period.

This nave, then, much later than Becket's era, leads somewhat

unsympathetically to that most interesting spot in the whole Cathedral,

the north transept. Here is the "Martyrdom," as that massive Norman

cross-limb where Becket fell beneath the swords and axes of his

murderers is still called. You look down into it from the steps leading

into the choir and choir-aisles, as into a pit. Little changed, in the

midst of all else that has been altered, this north transept alone

remains very much as it was when he was slain, more than seven hundred

years ago, and the sight of its stern, massive walls does much to

bring back to those who behold them that fierce scene which, in the

passage of all those years and the heaping of dull verbiage piled up

by industrious Dryasdusts and beaters of the air, has been dulled and

blunted.

Barham--our witty and mirthful Tom Ingoldsby--felt a keen personal

interest in this scene, for was not his ancestor--as he conceived him

to be--Reginald FitzUrse, the chief actor in that bloody scene of

Becket's death? He is flippant, it must be allowed, in the reference he

makes to the occurrence in the _Ingoldsby Legends_:

A fair Cathedral, too, the story goes,

And kings and heroes lie entombed within her;

There pious Saints in marble pomp repose,

Whose shrines are worn by knees of many a sinner;

There, too, full many an aldermanic nose

Roll'd its loud diapason after dinner;

And there stood high the holy sconce of Becket,

--Till four assassins came from France to crack it.

Historians have not yet agreed upon the character of Becket, and

no final conclusion is ever likely to be arrived at upon the vexed

question of who was right and who wrong in the long-drawn contention

between King and Archbishop. It is easy to shirk the point and to

decide that neither was right; but another and a more just resort is

to declare, after due consideration, that in the attempted secular

encroachments of the Crown, and in the resistance of the Archbishop to

any interference with the prerogatives and jurisdiction of the Church

and the clergy, both sides were impelled by the irresistible force

of circumstances. Becket was of English origin, and the first of the

downtrodden Saxon race who had won to such preferment since the Norman

rule began. Thus, besides being bound to defend the Church, of which he

had become the head, he was regarded by the people, who idolised him,

as their champion against those ruling classes whose mailed tyranny

crushed them to earth.

A prime difficulty in judging the character of Becket is the

extraordinary change in his conduct after he had been induced to accept

the Primacy, that goal and crown of the clerical career ardently

desired by all, and attained by Becket in his forty-third year. Long

the favourite of the King, and already, as Chancellor, at the height of

power and magnificence, there was little advantage in this elevation

to the throne of Saint Augustine, and he seemed singularly unfitted to

fill it, for until that juncture he had been among the most worldly of

men. As Chancellor, his magnificence had outshone that of the King,

he himself was gay and debonnair, clothed in purple and fine linen,

feasting royally, and with hundreds of knights in his train. Nothing

that the world could give had he denied himself. He was not only

impressed personally with his unfitness, but the monks of Canterbury

themselves, in conclave, desired to elect one of their own choice. It

was, therefore, against the desire of the Church and against his own

better judgment, foreseeing as he did much of the trouble that was to

come, that he was given the headship.

But once enthroned, his conduct changed. He dismissed his magnificent

household, feasted no more, expended his substance in charity and

himself in good works; became, indeed, and in very truth, that

Right Reverend Father in God which the simulacra, the windbags, the

ravening wolves, the emptinesses that for hundreds of years have

occupied his place, are styled. The sinner saved must be prepared for

misunderstandings--it is part of the cross and burden he has taken up.

The scarlet sins of the unregenerate are remembered against the saint,

and his saintliness becomes to his old boon companions a hypocritical

farce. That is why Becket's contemporaries did not understand him;

that, too, is why so many, dimly fumbling by the rush-light glimmer of

their little sputtering intelligences, presently choked and dowsed in

the dusty, cobwebby garrets of incredible accretions of lies, mistakes,

perversions and general rag-bag of pitiful futilities, have been left

wandering in infinite darkness, and content so to wander in estimating

him.

It was the sinners whose poisonous tongues did, by dint of much

persistence, estrange the King's affections from Becket within a year,

and their innuendoes were remembered when a growing struggle over

disputed privileges found the Archbishop immovably set upon what he

regarded as his duty, and not at all prepared to favour the King. If

Henry had supposed the Archbishop whom he had created would be in every

sense his creature, he must have been furious at his gross mistake.

The fury of the Norman kings was like the unrestrained paroxysms of a

raving maniac, and opposition threw them into transports of rage, felt

severely by animate and inanimate objects alike. This second Henry,

whose eyes were said to have in repose been gentle and dove-like, is

no exception. Ill fares the messenger who brings him bad news--as

ill sometimes as though he had brought about the untoward things of

which he tells. Slight displeasure means a thump, a resounding smack

on the face from the Royal hands, or a right Royal kick on that part

where honour is so easily hurt. May not enquiring minds, diligently

bent on running to earth the origin of the still existing etiquette of

retreating backwards from the presence of the sovereign, find it in a

natural desire of courtiers at all hazards to protect that honour?

Conceive, then, the really Royal rage of this King, bearded by someone

not to be dissuaded, persuaded, admonished, or let or hindered in any

particular. He became like a wild beast, tearing whatever came in

his way, flinging off his clothes, throwing himself on the floor and

gnawing the straw and rushes, and not merely kicking the posteriors of

messengers, but flying at them with intent to tear out their eyes.

What was that which wrought such enmity between such old-time friends?

Not merely one, but many things, but first and last among them the

determination of the King that the clergy, instead of being amenable

for offences only to the ecclesiastical courts, should be answerable

to the civil tribunals. This, the earliest of the at last happily

successful series of blows at clerical privilege, seemed to Becket

almost sacrilegious, and he determined to protect the Church against

what was, he honestly thought, according to his lights and his

sacerdotal sympathies, an unwarranted attack.

By all accounts this saint was not, in his new character, the most

tactful of men. With the old courtier days gone by, he had discarded

the courtier-like speech, and austerely held his own. Jealous of him,

several great dignitaries of the Church supported the King: among

them the Archbishop of York, and the Bishops of London and Salisbury.

Becket, as their spiritual chief, hurled excommunication at them, and

it was even feared that he would do the same by the King. Then, in fear

of his life, he went into six years' exile, ended by a pretence of

reconciliation that was patently a pretence, even before he sailed for

England. He was weary of exile, and ready to lay down his life for the

Church.

It was early in December 1170 that he returned to Canterbury, "to die,"

as he prophetically had said, before embarking. Quarrels, insults, and

petty persecutions met him, and thus sped December to its close. On

Christmas Day he preached in the Cathedral on the text, as he read it

(an all-important reservation), "On earth, peace to men of good will."

"There is no peace," he declared, "but to men of good will," and with

solemn meaning, readily understood by the great congregation that

heard him, spoke of the martyrs who had fallen in olden days. It was

possible, he added, that they would soon have another.

"Father," wailed that assembled multitude, "why do you desert us so

soon? To whom will you leave us?" But, heedless of the interruption, he

passed from a plaintive strain to one of fiery indignation, ending, in

a voice of thunder, by a full and particular excommunication of many of

his enemies and persecutors. "May they be cursed," his voice resounded

through the building, "by Jesus Christ, and may their memory be blotted

out of the assembly of the saints, whoever shall sow discord between me

and my lord the King." So saying, he, with mediæval symbolism, dashed

down a lighted candle upon the stones, to typify the extinction of

those accurst, and, with religious exaltation on his face, left the

pulpit, saying to his crossbearer, "One martyr, St. Alphege, you have

already; another, if God will, you will have soon."

Already, while he spoke, his furrow was drawing to its end. Over in

Normandy, where the King was keeping Christmas, the Archbishop of York

and the Bishops of London and Salisbury were suggesting that it would

be a good thing if there were no Becket. "So long as Thomas lives,"

said one, "you will have neither good days, nor peaceful kingdom, nor

quiet life."

The thought thus instilled into the King's mind threw him into a

frenzy. "A fellow," he shouted--"a fellow that has eaten my bread has

lifted up his heel against me; a fellow that I loaded with benefits has

dared to insult the King and the whole Royal family, and tramples on

the whole kingdom; a fellow that came to Court on a lame sumpter-mule

sits without hindrance on the throne itself. What sluggard wretches,

what cowards, have I brought up in my Court, who care nothing for their

allegiance to their master! Not one will deliver me from this low-born,

turbulent priest!" So saying, he rushed from the room, doubtless to

roll in one of those ungovernable Plantagenet rages upon the floor of

some secluded chamber.

The four knights who from among that Court sprang forth to prove

themselves, even to the awful extremities of sacrilege and murder,

true King's men, were Reginald FitzUrse, Hugh de Moreville, William de

Tracy, and Richard le Bret. In the light of later events, the monkish

chroniclers, eager to discover the marvellous in every circumstance of

the tragedy, found a dark significance in their very names. FitzUrse,

they said, was of truly bear-like character; De Moreville's name

proclaimed him to be of "the city of death"; Le Bret was "the brute."

With so much ingenuity available, it is quite surprising they could

not twist Tracy's name into something allusive to murder; but they

had to be content with the weak suggestion that he was of "parricidal

wickedness." All save Le Bret had been knights owning fealty to Becket

while he was Chancellor.

It is detailed in these pages, in the description of Saltwood Castle,

how they landed in England and made for Canterbury. A dreadful

circumstance is that they knew perfectly well on whom to call when

they reached the city, and waited upon a sympathiser with the King,

Clarembald, the Abbot of St. Augustine's, who is thus sufficiently

implicated.

From the Abbot's lodging they sent a command, ordering the Mayor to

issue a proclamation in the King's name forbidding any help being

given to the Archbishop. Then they took horse again and rode to the

Palace, accompanied by their men-at-arms, whom they posted in a house

hard by the gateway. The short day of December 29th was nearly at

its close when they drew rein in the courtyard beneath the great hall

of the Palace, where the Archbishop and his household had but just

retired from supper. They had left their swords outside, and came as

travellers, their mailed armour concealed under long cloaks. Entering

the hall they met the seneschal, who ushered them into the private room

where the Archbishop sat, among his intimates. "My lord," he said,

"here are four knights from King Henry wishing to speak with you"; and

they were bidden enter.

FitzUrse began the furious discussion. The knights had seated

themselves on the floor at the Archbishop's feet, and waited until he

should finish the conversation he was holding with a monk. When Becket

turned and looked calmly at each in turn, ending with saluting Tracy by

name, FitzUrse it was who broke in with a contemptuous "God help you!"

The Archbishop's face flushed crimson. He was a man of vehement nature,

and it is wonderful that he restrained himself from striking that

insolent intruder. "We have a message from the King over the water,"

continued FitzUrse; "tell us whether you will hear it in private, or in

the hearing of all."

Within the hearing of all that message, such as it was, was given.

It was but a reiteration of old demands and old grievances, made to

goad the Archbishop into fury, and to afford an excuse for an attack

upon him. The discussion aroused both sides to anger, and the knights,

calling upon all to prevent the Archbishop from escaping, dashed off,

with the cry of "To arms!" for their swords.

But Becket harboured no thoughts of escape. Although he perceived

that death was near, he made no retreat, being indeed, by this time,

fanatically bent upon the martyr's crown. Outside, the signal had been

already given to the men-at-arms, who now came pouring in, with shouts

of "Réaux!" or "King's men." The knights now returned, their swords

girt about them. Already, however, the Archbishop's attendants had

closed and barred the doors, and were endeavouring to save him from

that death he seemed to welcome. With kindly violence they pushed and

pulled him by obscure passages from the Palace and along the cloisters,

while the blows of axes and the splintering of wood told how in

their rear the murderers were hewing their way onward. Thus at last,

strenuously resisting, he was impelled towards the door that opened

from the cloisters into the north transept.

Once within the Cathedral the monks bolted the door behind them, and in

their haste excluded some of their brethren, thus left, unprotected,

to face the onrush of armed men. Hearing these unfortunate ones vainly

knocking for admittance, Becket, exerting all his authority, commanded

the door to be opened; and when he found his words disregarded, broke

away from those who held him and drew back the bolts with his own hands.

Seeing the way thus made clear for those pursuing men of wrath, the

crowd of anxious monks surrounding the Archbishop immediately turned

and fled to those hiding-places they knew of. Only three remained,

dauntless, by their chief. These were Robert of Merton, William

FitzStephen, and Edward Grim, who stood by him, vainly imploring him to

flee. Only one concession he made to their entreaties. He would go to

the choir, and there, before the high altar, the holiest place in the

Cathedral, with all dignity make an end.

It was as he was thus ascending the steps from the transept that the

knights burst into the sacred building. Bewildered at first by the

almost complete darkness, they could only shout at random, "Where is

Thomas Becket, traitor to the King?" No answer. Then, falling over a

monk, came an oath, from FitzUrse, and the question, "Where is the

Archbishop?" Becket himself answered, and descending again into the

transept, confronted them. He stood in front of what was then the the

Chapel of St. Benedict, and calmly asked, "Reginald, why do you come

into my church armed?" For answer FitzUrse thrust a carpenter's axe he

had found against his breast, and with a savage oath declared, "You

shall die: I will tear out your heart!" "Fly!" exclaimed another, not

so eager to commit the sin of sacrilege, before which the mediæval

world recoiled; "Fly! or you are a dead man!" striking him with the

flat of his sword, to emphasise the warning.

[Illustration: THE "MARTYRDOM," CANTERBURY CATHEDRAL.]

Then the four united their efforts to drag him from the Cathedral,

but without success. Himself a powerful man, he seized Tracy and

flung him heavily upon the pavement. FitzUrse, advancing upon him

with a drawn sword, he called by a vile name, adding, "You profligate

wretch, you are my man; you have done me fealty; you ought not to touch

me." No fear, it will be seen, in all this, but a not unreasonable

fury, somewhat obscuring the martyr spirit. Fury on both sides, for

FitzUrse, losing the last atom of restraint, and yelling "Strike!"

aimed a blow with his great, two-handed sword that, had it been better

directed, must have smote off the Archbishop's head. As it was, it

merely skimmed off his cap. Becket, who must have been momentarily

surprised to find himself still alive, then covered his eyes with his

hands, and bending his head, was heard to commend his cause and the

cause of the Church to God, to St. Denis of France, to St. Alphege

and all the saints of the Church. Tracy then dealt a blow, partly

intercepted by Grim, whose arm, protecting the Archbishop, was broken

by it. By this time blood was trickling down the Archbishop's face.

He wiped it away and murmured, "Into Thy hands, O Lord, I commend my

spirit;" and then, falling at a further blow from Tracy, "For the name

of Jesus, and for the defence of the Church, I am willing to die."

There he lay, and so lying, received a tremendous stroke from Richard

le Bret, who accompanied it with the exclamation, "Take this, for love

of my lord William, brother of the King!" That stroke not only clove

away the upper part of the skull, but the sword itself was broken in

two. Vengeance was accomplished.

When the assassins fled from that scene of blood, it was quite dark.

They went as they had come, by the cloisters, shouting that they were

"King's men," and cursing and stumbling over unfamiliar steps. A

servant of the Archdeacon of Sens was sufficiently unfortunate to be

wailing for the cruel death of the Archbishop when they passed, and

foolish enough to be in their way. They fell over him, and, still heady

with that struggle and the lust of blood, gave him in passing a mailed

kick, and so tremendous a sword-thrust that for long afterwards he had

sufficient occasion to lament for himself.

It was something of an anti-climax to their murderous passions that

they should, as they now did, repair to the Archbishop's Palace and

make a burglarious raid upon the gold and silver vessels of the church,

and loot from Becket's stables the magnificent horses he kept. With

this personal plunder, and with a mass of the Archbishop's documents

and papers seized on behalf of the King, they were preparing to

depart when the very unusual circumstance in December of a violent

thunderstorm set a final scene of horror upon that closing day.

The news fell heavily upon the people of Canterbury, who reverenced

Becket far more than did those within the Church who had immediately

surrounded him; and the citizens came rushing like an irresistible

torrent into the Cathedral as soon as they heard of the sacrilegious

deed.

Like the greater number of our cathedrals, this of Canterbury has been

greatly altered since that time. It was into a Norman nave that the

excited populace thronged--a building that must have closely resembled

the still-existing nave of that period at Gloucester, gloomy and dark

at the best of times, but on this December evening a well of infinite

blackness, faintly illuminated by the distant lights twinkling in

the choir and on the high altar. This horror-stricken crowd was only

with great difficulty forced back and at last shut out, and it was

long before the monks returned to the transept where the Archbishop

had fallen before the blows of the four. There his body lay in the

dark, as it had been left, his blood still wet on those cold stones,

as Osbert, the chamberlain, entering with a single light, held out at

arm's length in that cavern of blackness and unimaginable gloom, steps

in it, and, if he be not quite different from other men, shudders and

almost drops his glimmering candle when he finds what awful moisture

that is in which he has been walking. Osbert alone has ventured to seek

his master. Where, then, are the others of his household? In hiding,

like those monks who, now that all is still, venture, like rats, to

come from their hiding-holes in chapel and triforium, or from secret

places contrived for such emergencies in the roof.

The Archbishop lay upon his face, the upper part of his scalp sliced

off by that whirling blow of Tracy's, and the contents of his head

spilled over the pavement, just as a bowl of liquid might be overset.

Osbert, with rare fortitude, replaces that scalp as one might replace a

lid, and binding the head, he and the monks between them place the body

upon a bier and carry it to the high altar in the choir.

There were those among the monks who felt small sympathy for Becket. To

them he was but a proud worldling whose remarkable preferment to the

Primacy had been scandalous, and whose quarrels with the King had been,

they thought, dictated more for the advancement of his own personal

authority than for sake of a purely impersonal desire to preserve and

cherish the rights of the Church. He had been elected Archbishop by

desire of the King and against the feeling of the Priory, and they

thought he should, in consequence, have been more complaisant to Royal

demands. They were not a little jealous of the man set to rule over

them, and moreover, could not at once perceive the martyr and the saint

in the dignitary thus at last struck down in that long struggle. They

were horror-stricken at the sacrilege of it, but did not burst into

grief and lamentations for the individual until that happened which

put a very different complexion upon the dead Archbishop's character.

Far into the night, as the monks sat in the choir around that silent

figure, his aged friend and instructor, Robert of Merton, told them of

the secret austerities of his later life, and made a revelation that

wholly changed their mental attitude. To prove his words, he exposed

the many layers of the clothing to those who gathered round, and showed

how, beneath all, and next the skin, the "luxurious" Archbishop had

worn the habit of a monk, and had endured the disciplinary discomfort

of a hair-shirt. There, too, on the skin, were visible the weals of the

daily scourgings by which the Archbishop mortified the flesh. Nor was

this the sum of his virtues, for when, a little later, his garments

were removed, previous to interment, they were found to be swarming

with vermin; that hair-cloth, itself so penitential, densely populated

with a crawling mass whose presence must have made it more penitential

still. According to the accounts of those who beheld these transcendent

proofs of sanctity, the hair-cloth was bubbling over with these

inhabitants, like water in a simmering cauldron.

At sight of such unmistakable evidences of holiness the brethren went

into hysterics. "See, see," they said to one another, "what a true

monk he was, and we knew it not!"--an oblique and unpleasing reflection

upon the personal habits of the monastic orders. They kissed him, as

he lay dead there, and called him "St. Thomas," and at last, unwilling

that any tittle of his sanctity should be impugned, buried him in his

verminous condition.

Meanwhile, newly alive to the saintly character of him whom they now

clearly perceived to be a martyr, orders were given to rail off the

spot where he had fallen, and for every trace of his blood to be

jealously preserved. But unhappily for the Church, the common people,

who had from the moment of his death regarded their Archbishop as a

martyred saint, had already soaked up the greater part of that precious

blood in strips hastily torn from their clothes, and had been given

his stained and splashed outer garments. These were losses that could

never be made good, but they did not greatly matter to those who could

so dilute the little remaining blood that it sufficed to supply the

uncounted thousands of pilgrims who made pilgrimage to the shrine of

St. Thomas for the space of three hundred and fifty years, and took

away with them little phials containing, as they fondly believed, so

intimate a relic of England's most powerful saint.

In spite of the dark legends that tell how vengeance overtook the

assassins, it does not seem to be the fact that they were adequately

punished for their fearful crime, and certainly no Royal displeasure

lighted upon them. "The wicked," we are told, "flee when no man

pursueth," and the knights, fearful of the revenge that might be taken

upon them by the people of Canterbury, rode off, unhindered, with their

small escort of men-at-arms, to Saltwood. Within that stronghold they

felt safe. That they would have been equally safe at Canterbury we may

suppose, for Robert de Broc, shut up within the strong walls of the

Archbishop's Palace, felt strong enough to threaten the monks with what

he would do if they dared so honour the dead Prelate as to bury him

among the tombs of the Archbishops. He would, he declared, tear out the

body, hang it from a gibbet, hew it in pieces, and throw the fragments

by the highway, to be devoured by swine or birds of prey. It is quite

evident that Robert de Broc was a good hater and a very thorough

partisan of the King. The monks did well to be afraid of him, and

meekly forbearing from giving offence, laid their martyr in the crypt.

The four lay only one night at Saltwood. The next day they rode to

the old manor-house of South Malling, near Lewes, itself a property

belonging to the Archbishops, and throwing down their arms and

accoutrements upon a dining-table in the hall, gathered comfortably

round the cheerful hearth, when--says the legend--the table, unwilling

to bear that sacrilegious burden, started back and threw the repugnant

load on the ground. The arms were replaced by the startled servants,

who came rushing in with torches; but again they were flung away, this

time with even greater force. It was one of the knights who, with

blanched face, declared the supernatural nature of this happening.

The following morning they were off again, bound for Hugh de

Moreville's far distant Yorkshire castle of Knaresborough, where they

remained for one year. It would have been too scandalous a thing for

the King to receive his bravos at once, for he had a part of his own

to play that would have been quite spoiled by such indecent haste--a

dramatic part, but one that fails to carry any conviction of its

sincerity. It was at Argenton that he heard of the successful issue

of his commission, and on receipt of the news isolated himself for

three days, refused all food but milk of almonds, rolled himself in

penitential sackcloth and ashes, and grievously called upon God to

witness that he was not responsible for the Archbishop's death. "Alas!"

exclaimed that trembling hypocrite, "alas! that it ever happened."

But it is not in empty lamentations, real or feigned, that penitence

is found. The assassins went unpunished, and, together with others

of Becket's bitterest enemies within and without the Church, were

even promoted. Before two years had passed the four knights were

found constantly at the King's Court, on familiar terms with him

and his companions in hunting. It is a cynical commentary upon the

kingly penitence that one of the murderers, William de Tracy, became

Justiciary of Normandy. But something had to be done to expiate a

deed whose echoes rumbled horrifically throughout Europe. The Pope,

Alexander III., indicated a course of fighting against the infidel

in the Holy Land, and it seems probable that they did so work off

their sins; all except Tracy, who, having made over his Devonshire

manor of Daccombe to the Church, for the maintenance of a monk for

ever, to celebrate masses for the repose of the souls of the living

and the dead, set out for Palestine, but was for so long driven back

by contrary winds that he almost despaired of setting foot abroad.

This especial retribution meted out to him was for the particular

heinousness of having dealt the first effective blow at the martyr.

When at last he was carried to the coast of Calabria, he was seized

with a mysterious disease at Cosenza, a disease whose agonies made him

tear the flesh from his bones with his own hands. Thus entreating,

"Mercy, St. Thomas!" he perished miserably.

The mysticism of the time told many dreadful legends. Dogs refused to

eat from the tables of the murderers; grass would not grow where their

feet went; those they loved were doomed to misery and death.

From the King a certain humiliation was demanded, but it amounted to

little beyond an oath, taken on the gospels before the Papal legates,

that he had not ordered or desired the murder, and an expressed

readiness to restore property belonging to the See of Canterbury. This

easy satisfaction was given at Avranches, in May 1172, but if it was

sufficient for the Pope it did by no means calm the English people,

who saw in the cumulative domestic troubles and foreign disasters

of the time the wrath of Heaven. The greater penance of 1174 was

accordingly decided upon. Arriving from Normandy on July 8th, he

journeyed to Canterbury, to the shrine of the already sainted martyr,

by the Pilgrims' Road, living the while upon bread and water. Coming to

Harbledown, he resigned horseback for a barefooted walk into the city.

Thus, with a mere woollen shirt and a cloak, he came to the Cathedral,

kneeling in the porch, and then proceeding directly to the scene of

the martyrdom, where he again knelt and kissed the stone where the

Archbishop had died. From that spot, he was conducted to the crypt,

where the tomb still remained, and, placing his head and shoulders in

the tomb itself, received on his shoulders five strokes of a rod from

each bishop and abbot present, and three each from the by-standing

eighty monks. This discipline must have killed him had those monks laid

on with the hearty goodwill customary with prison warders; but their

stripes were mere formalities, and the King departed the next morning,

after passing a solitary fasting vigil in the crypt, where, during the

solemn hours of the night, he had had ample opportunity of repentance.

From Canterbury he rode to London, absolved and with a whole skin.

The nation saw much virtue in this public reparation. How could they

fail so to do when the affairs of the realm took an immediate and

decided turn for the better, when the King of Scots, long a terror

in the north, was captured at Alnwick, and when the invading fleet

of Henry's own rebellious son was repulsed? The forgiveness and the

miraculous intercession of the beatified Thomas were prompt and

efficacious.

The cult of this peculiarly sainted person was extraordinary, and

far transcended that of any other martyr. To his shrine, erected in

a place of especial honour, and encrusted with gold and gems, the

pilgrims of many nations and many centuries flocked, greatly to the

enrichment of the Church. The miraculous cures wrought at his tomb,

and the marvellous legends that clustered around the story of his life

and death, were the theme of ages. But the gross superstitions, and

the grosser scandals, tricks, and miscellaneous knaveries that were

encouraged by that martyr-worship had discredited him by the time of

Henry VIII., that less superstitious age when it was possible for the

King and his advisers to declare "Thomas Becket" a traitor, to submit

his relics to every indignity, to destroy them and his shrine, and to

seize all the endowments and valuables connected with his worship.

The great destruction wrought at the Reformation accounts for the

scantiness of Becket's memorials. Here, in the "Martyrdom," only the

Norman walls that looked down upon the scene, and some portions of the

pavement, are left. A square piece of stone, inserted in the middle of

a large slab, marks the exact spot where he fell, and tells how the

original stone, regarded as of a peculiar sanctity, had been at some

time or another removed.

The Ingoldsby Country: Literary Landmarks of the "Ingoldsby Legends" · 第 4 / 18 章