CHAPTER XV.

CONCLUSION.

More strange than true. I never may believe

These antique fables, nor these fairy toys.

Lovers and madmen have such seething brains,

Such shaping fantasies, that apprehend

More than cool reason ever comprehends.

The lunatic, the lover, and the poet

Are of imagination all compact;

One sees more devils than vast hell can hold;

That is the madman: the lover, all as frantic,

Sees Helen's beauty in a brow of Egypt;

The poet's eye, in a fine frenzy rolling,

Doth glance from heaven to earth, from earth to heaven,

And, as imagination bodies forth

The forms of things unknown, the poet's pen

Turns them to shapes, and gives to airy nothing

A local habitation and a name.

Such tricks hath strong imagination:

That, if it would but apprehend some joy,

It comprehends some bringer of that joy;

Or, in the night, imagining some fear,

How easy is a bush supposed a bear.

_Shakspere._

In the preceding chapters the chief object I have had in view has been

to show that many superstitions and legends yet, or recently, familiar

to the people of our northern counties, were, like their congeners in

other portions of Europe, descendants from one common parentage. I have

dealt almost entirely with that species of folk-lore which I think has

been originally communicated _orally_ from one generation to another,

and not so much with that which may be termed the _literary_ fictions of

Europe and the East, except in so far as there is good reason to know

that the latter are built upon the former. Still Oriental scholars

assure us that "many of our best European fictions, as well single

stories as whole collections, may be traced from Europe to Arabia, and

from Arabia to India, and that the _Indian_ form of the story or

collection _almost invariably bears the marks of an earlier origin than

any other form_, and appears to be, if not the original form, at least

the oldest surviving one."[36]

Doubtless many other traditionary observances, now nearly obsolete,

might be traced to a similar origin to that which I have ascribed to

those treated of in this work. Sufficient, however, I believe, has been

done to demonstrate the fact that many of them are of much greater

antiquity than has generally been supposed. A national religion may be

changed in a relatively short period of time, but superstition and

tradition, in some form or other, hold their own amongst the populace

for ages after their original significance has perished.[37] Hallam,

referring to the religious condition of the Britons at the time of the

heptarchy, says "the retention of heathen superstitions was not

incompatible, in that age, with a cordial faith" in Christianity.

The late war in Mexico has afforded a striking modern instance of the

truth of this proposition. The Christianity of the native Mexican

Indians, according to a writer in the _Pall Mull Gazette_ (July, 1867),

"is of a very crude and undeveloped kind, and indeed it is very doubtful

whether in some parts of the country it has ever really eradicated the

old religion. _But it is quite certain that it has not eradicated the

old superstitions._ Just as many Pagan feasts in Southern Italy have

been converted into Christian feasts by mere change of name, so has the

Christianity of the Mexicans been grafted on to their old belief and

superstitions, and although they may not quite have believed that the

arrival of the Emperor Maximilian was really the fulfilment of the long

promised second advent of their ancient god Quetzalcoatle, yet he

nevertheless had a white face and a yellow beard, and came from the West

in a ship, and was of an illustrious descent, and there is no doubt of

the fact that the Mexican Indians received him with open arms, and with

a more or less superstitious veneration, looking to him for the

regeneration of their country and for a release from the dominion of the

Spanish creoles."

The Maories, like several branches of the Aryan race, deified, during

life, some of their own warriors. "Watches and white men also were at

first regarded as deities; the latter," says Sir John Lubbock, "not

perhaps unnaturally, as being armed with thunder and lightning." The

Dyaks of Saráwak regard the late Sir James Brooke as a species of deity.

After explaining the conditions under which they lived previous to his

advent amongst them, and the vast amelioration in the conditions of

their existence attendant upon his rule, Mr. Alfred Russel Wallace, in

his "Malay Archipelago," says,--

"And the unknown stranger who had done all this for them, and asked for

nothing in return, what could he be? How was it possible for them to

realise his motives? Was it not natural that they should refuse to

believe he was a man? for of pure benevolence combined with great power,

they had had no experience amongst men. They naturally concluded that he

was a superior being, come down upon earth to confer blessings upon the

afflicted. In many villages where he had not been seen, I was asked

strange questions about him. Was he not as old as the mountains? Could

he not bring the dead to life? And they firmly believe that he can give

them good harvests, and make their fruit trees bear an abundant crop."

Historians are now pretty generally satisfied, from the combined

evidences of philology, ethnology, and tradition, that the bulk of the

European nations had a common origin in the East, and that some Asiatic

tribes are descendent from the same original stock. I am not, however,

insensible to the value of the fact that the early action and thought of

all tribes or nations present a certain amount of resemblance, on

account of the similar conditions to which each has been subjected. The

aborigines of Australia, the South Sea Islands, and America, procured

fire by means of an instrument similar to the "chark" of the modern

Hindoos and their Aryan ancestors, but they did not give it the same

name. The modern Jews, of Semitic origin, sacrifice the common fowl on

the eve of the Feast of the Atonement. The belief in the mystical

character of chanticleer is equally shared by the Lancashire and Cornish

peasant, the Norseman, the Welshman, the ancient Roman, the modern

Hindoo, and some of the North-African tribes. Mr. Lapham, in describing

the "Animal Mounds" of Wisconsin, speaks of one carved into the shape of

a great serpent, in Adams County. He says,--"Conforming to the curve of

the hill, and occupying its very summit, is the serpent, its head

resting near the point, and its body winding back for seven hundred

feet, in graceful undulations, terminating in a triple coil at the tail.

The entire length, if extended, would be not less than one thousand

feet.... The outline of the work is clearly and boldly defined.... The

neck of the serpent is stretched out, and slightly curved, and its mouth

is opened wide, as if in the act of swallowing or ejecting an oval

figure, which rests partially within the distended jaws. This oval is

formed by an embankment of earth, without any perceptible opening, four

feet in height, and is perfectly regular in outline, its transverse and

conjugate diameters being one hundred and sixty, and eighty feet,

respectively." This looks, certainly, very like the gigantic Scotch

serpent mound, referred to at page 51 of this work, and the huge worm

hills of Durham and the North of England. Sir John Lubbock has treated

this branch of the subject exhaustively in his recent work on "The

Origin of Civilization and the Primitive Condition of Man."

The Arabs and other Semitic tribes worshipped the sun as well as the

Aryans. The sun and fire worship, likewise, was found to obtain in more

than one state on the discovery of South America. Many writers have

arrived at the conclusion that "there was communication between the Old

World and America in very remote times." Mr. Baldwin (Pre-historic

Nations, p. 393) contends that "the antiquities of Mexico and Central

America reveal religious symbols, devices, and ideas nearly identical

with those found in all countries of the Old World where Cushite

communities formerly existed. They show us planet worship with its usual

orphic and phallic accompaniments. Humboldt, having travelled in

America, and observed remains of these civilisations, was convinced that

such communications formerly existed. He found evidence of it in the

religious symbols, the architecture, the hieroglyphics, and the social

customs made manifest by the ruins, which he was sure came from the

other side of the ocean; and, in his view, the date of this

communication was older than 'the present division of Asia into Chinese,

Mongols, Hindus,' etc. Humboldt did not observe symbols of phallic

worship, but the Abbé Brasseur de Bourbourg shows that they were

described by Spanish writers at the time of the Conquest. He points out

that they were prevalent in the countries of Mexico and Central

America, being very abundant at Colhuacan, on the Gulf of California,

and at Panuco. Colhuacan was a flourishing city, and the capital of an

important kingdom; 'there,' he says, 'phallic institutions had existed

from time immemorial.' At Panuco phallic symbols abounded in the temples

and on the public monuments. These, with the serpent devices, the sun

worship, and the remarkable knowledge of astronomy that existed in

connection with them, show a system of religion of which the Abbé is

constrained to say: 'Asia appears to have been the cradle of this

religion, and of the social institutions which it consecrated.'" The

ancient traditions preserved by the inhabitants seem to countenance this

view. They speak of a race of "bearded white men who came across the

ocean from the East."

A writer in a recent number of the _Gentleman's Magazine_ has the

following pertinent remarks on this curious and interesting

subject:--"One fact corroborative of the idea that the Old World, or at

least some of the inhabitants of Asia, were once aware of the existence

of America before its discovery by Columbus, is that many of the Arabian

ulema with whom I have conversed on this subject are fully convinced

that the ancient Arabian geographers knew of America; and, in support of

this opinion, point to passages in old works in which a country to the

west of the Atlantic is spoken of. An Arab gentleman, a friend of mine,

General Hussein Pasha, in a work he has just written on America, called

'En-Nesser-Et Tayir,' quotes from Djeldeki and other old writers to show

this."

This writer favours the view that the Chinese, at a very remote period,

became acquainted with the American continent, _via_ the Pacific Ocean.

Some writers regard the inscription on the celebrated Dighton rock, on

the east bank of the Taunton river, as Ph[oe]nician. This, however, has

been disputed. Others regard it as commemorative of an Indian triumph at

some remote period.

Dr. Charles Frederick Winslow, in his recently published work, "Force

and Nature," expresses himself strongly in favour of the truth of the

presumed ancient communication between the Asian and the American

continents. He says:--

"In order to sustain this position, I might, were it admissible, adduce

here, as collateral proof, an important and hitherto unpublished fact,

of an archæological character, in addition to my geographical and

geological observations made upon the coasts and islands of the Pacific

Ocean. The fact is this, brought to my knowledge by an unusually

extensive practice of my profession, that a uniform custom of

_dorsocision_ has existed throughout the Polynesian islands from periods

unknown, and beyond all tradition, embracing alike New Zealand, Esther

Island, Tahiti, the Marquesas, and Hawaii--a rite wholly different from,

but similar in its results to, the Jewish one of circumcision; and that

this has been performed at the eighth or ninth year in all of them, and

transmitted by father to son, with undeviating precision, from

generation to generation. A fact of this character so deeply rooted in

the moral, social, and traditional life of many peoples thus widely

distributed throughout that vast ocean, so remotely separated from each

other, and without intercourse, indicates even more strongly than

colour, caste or language, not only the unity of their progenitors, but

also the wide-spread existence of a single race, the vestiges of which

were left here and there above the waters when the land sank between

America and Asia, and received the older seas into a new basin."

Various hypotheses have been suggested as to the direction in which the

flora of the "Old World," and especially of the _miocene_ division of

the tertiary formations, migrated to America, or _vice versa_. Heer, the

celebrated Swiss naturalist, favours the Atlantic route, and regards

certain important relations between the fauna of the continents of

Europe and America as corroborative, to some extent, at least, of the

truth of the statement of the Egyptian priests to Plato, that there, at

one time, existed a continent named Atlantis, in the midst of the space

now occupied by the Atlantic ocean. Sir Charles Lyell, however, on

geological grounds, dissents from this view, and rather inclines to the

one propounded by Dr. Asa Gray and Mr. Bentham, that the route of the

migration was in the opposite or Pacific direction, "and took a course

four times as long across America and the whole of Asia." Lyell

says,--"It is the enormous depth and width of the Atlantic which makes

us shrink from the hypothesis of a migration of plants, fitted for a

sub-tropical climate in the Upper Miocene period, from America to

Europe, by a direct course from west to east. Can we not escape from

this difficulty by adopting the theory that the forms of vegetation

common to recent America and Miocene Europe, first extended from east to

west across North America and passed thence by Behring's Straits and the

Aleutian Islands to Kamtschatka, and thence by land, placed between the

40th and 60th parallels of latitude where the Kurile Islands and Japan

are now situated, and thence to China, from which they made their way

across Asia to Europe?"

Mr. Consul Plowden, in a report to the Earl of Clarendon, a few years

ago, mentions some Abyssinian superstitions which much resemble others

of Aryan origin. Although the Abyssinians are said to be descended from

the Semitic[38] branch of the human family, it must not be forgotten

that Christianity has prevailed amongst them from a very early period;

and, consequently, sympathetic intercourse must have taken place in the

less remote past between them and some of the offshoots of the Aryan

stock. Mr. Plowden says,--

"The Abyssinians are superstitious; they believe in the efficacy of

amulets; of writings in jargon mixed with Scripture; in the charms of

Mussulmans to control the hail and the rain; in spirits of the forest

and the river; in omens; in fortune-tellers; and in devils that may be

cast out by spells from their human victims, quoting the authority of

the New Testament for their belief--to these they attribute epilepsy and

other incurable diseases. One absurdity has, however, led to the death

of many innocent individuals; all workers in iron, and some others, are

supposed to convert themselves into hyenas, and to prey invisibly on

their enemies, and many have been slaughtered in this belief. This

singular idea, which is universal and tenacious, has its parallel in the

'loup-garou' of France and the 'wehr-wolf' of Germany."

Speaking of the natives of Minahasa, the north-east promontory of the

island Celebes, in the Malayan Archipelago, Mr. Russel Wallace, after

commending their modern qualities, refers to their original condition

when first discovered by Europeans. He says,--

"Their religion was that naturally engendered in the undeveloped human

mind by the contemplation of grand natural phenomena and the luxuriance

of tropical nature. The burning mountain, the torrent and the lake, were

the abode of their deities; and certain trees and birds were supposed to

have especial influence over men's actions and destiny. They held wild

and exciting festivals to propitiate these deities or demons; and

believed that men could be changed by them into animals, either during

life or after death."

These superstitions would themselves suggest some remote connection with

India; and, singularly enough, Mr. Wallace, in his map of the Malay

Archipelago, just includes them within the boundary line which divides

the Hindoo-Malayan from the Austro-Malayan region of this district.

Indeed, as has been before observed, he shows that in the neighbouring

island of Bali, the religion of the Brahmins still obtains, and that

magnificent ruins of their temples still exist in the island of Java.

Therefore it is not improbable some of these now reclaimed savages may

be only degenerate descendants from the original Hindoo-Aryan stock.

There is doubtless much force in Hallam's observation that "similarity

of laws and customs _may often_ be traced to natural causes in the state

of society rather than to imitation." Yet the strong tendency of all

humanity to imitation of every kind, the "toughness of tradition," and

the longevity of superstitious belief, are nevertheless equally powerful

agents in the mental development of humanity, and demand the most

careful consideration and regard, when the nature and character of

progressive civilisation, in any age or country, is subjected to

philosophical analysis.

It will be seen from the preceding chapters, that many traditions and

superstitions appear insensibly to glide into each other. Sometimes two

or more seem, as it were, to overlie one another, or to have become

indeed even more intimately compounded. With regard to superstitions,

this is very apparent in those which relate to witchcraft, were-wolves,

transformations, the furious host, the spectre huntsman, giants, heroes,

tyrant lords, etc. This is parallelled by many traditionary beliefs both

general and local. In whatever part of the country stands a ruined

castle or abbey or other religious establishment, the nearest peasant or

even farmer, will assure an enquirer that it was battered into ruin by

Oliver Cromwell! Here the secretary Cromwell, of Henry the Eighth's

reign, and the renowned Protector of the following century are evidently

amalgamated. Indeed the redoubted Oliver himself seems to have absorbed

all the castle-destroying heroes of the national history, Old Time

included. The Arthur legends appear to have been constructed upon a

somewhat similar principle. At the "pass of the Ribble," near Preston,

the site of Cromwell's victory over the Duke of Hamilton, every human

skull which is dug up or washed by the swollen river from out of its

banks, is believed to pertain to a "Scotch warrior" who fell in that

battle. Scottish armies have crossed the pass on several occasions from

the days of Athelstan to those of the "Young Pretender," but tradition

has fused them nearly all into one.

The sites of ruined churches, abbeys, etc., are believed yet to entomb

the ancient edifices, and superstitious people say that, by applying the

ear to the earth at midnight, on Christmas eve, they can hear the bells

ringing. It is not unlikely, when this practice was a common one, that

the sound of some distant bells might occasionally be feebly conducted

by the earth, and give countenance to this very universal superstition.

The strength of this species of traditionary faith was forcibly

illustrated, a few years ago, at the "Maudlands," Preston. Historical

records and discovered remains, as well as tradition, marked the

locality as the site of a Mediæval Hospital, dedicated to St. Mary

Magdalen. A "square mound," evidently an artificial earthwork, was a

conspicuous object. Learned antiquaries regarded this as of Roman

construction, although no actual remains had been discovered to attest

the truth of the conjecture. Popular superstition, however, declared

that the mound resulted from the pressure of the steeple of the church

of the Hospital, which was entombed beneath it, and that the truth of

this could be attested on any Christmas-Eve by the experiment referred

to. Doubts being entertained as to the Roman character of the work, some

local antiquaries caused excavations to be made in the mound. So

prevalent was this superstition, that, on the discovery of a small brick

chamber, scores of people eagerly visited the spot, and retired fully

convinced they had seen a portion of the steeple of the sunken edifice,

and that its discovery demonstrated the truth of the ancient tradition!

Singularly enough, in this instance, "antiquarianism" and "folk-lore"

proved equally at fault. Remains of pottery, bulbous shaped tobacco pipe

bowls, called by the populace both "fairy pipes" and "Cromwell pipes,"

etc., together with documentary and other evidence, enabled me, in my

"History of Preston and its Environs," to demonstrate that the mound in

question was the most modern structure then on the ground; that it

formed part of the defences of Preston constructed by Colonel Rosworm,

after the capture of the town by the Parliamentary troops under Sir John

Seaton, in 1643; and that the small brick chamber, in all probability,

was the remains of a powder and "match" magazine. However satisfactory

this appears to intelligent historical students and general readers,

still the sunken church and the Christmas-Eve bell-ringing yet finds

favour with some not otherwise ignorant persons. A precisely similar

legend is implicitly believed by many in connection with the Roman

outwork on Mellor Hill, on the line of ancient road from Manchester to

Ribchester.

Ancient castles and monasteries were supposed to have underground means

of intercommunication. One tradition of this class, near Preston,

presents some remarkable features. In my youth I and the public

generally firmly believed that some such work as the celebrated "Thames

tunnel" had, ages ago, been constructed beneath the bed of the Ribble

and its broad valley, to enable the monks at Tulketh to communicate

with the inmates of the priory on the opposite table land at Penwortham.

In the "History of Preston and its Environs," I have endeavoured to sift

out the little truth that may underlie this strange tradition. Finding

good evidence that each of these promontories had been occupied as

outposts or _speculæ_ in connection with the Roman station at the "Pass

of the Ribble," previously referred to, I have suggested that it is not

improbable the results of the rude system of telegraphy then in use

would be sufficient to utterly confound the ignorant peasantry of the

day, who would be unable to account for the rapid communication of

intelligence except by means of a secret underground passage. The monks

from Evesham, on the establishment of their "cell" at Penwortham, might,

from policy, countenance the tradition of their predecessors, especially

in troubled times, on account of the impression of power which such a

belief would naturally engender amongst the more ignorant of the

population. This way of accounting for the transmission of secret

information and even war material is by no means an uncommon one amongst

uneducated people in various parts of the world. In Abyssinia, according

to Mansfield Parkyns, the people firmly believe that the German

missionaries had "in the course of only a few days, perforated a tunnel

all the way (from Adowa) to Massowa, on the coast of the Red Sea, a

distance of above a hundred and fifty miles, whence they were to obtain

large supplies of arms, ammunition, etc."

In the churchyard at Ribchester the remains of a Roman temple dedicated

to Minerva have been discovered. Long before this, however, a singular

tradition was current respecting it. Leland, King Henry the Eighth's

antiquary, after visiting the spot, says:--"Ther is a place wher the

people fable that the _Jues_ had a Temple." Doubtless the edifice

discovered in the early part of the present century was the temple

referred to. In the middle period of Christianity in England, the only

old, or indeed, different religion to their own, known to the mass of

the people, would be the Jewish. Hence the confounding of the Pagan

Romans with their Israelitish successors.

The _Athenæum_ (Feb. 1868) contained the following paragraph, which

affords a marked modern illustration of this tendency to the confusion

of various traditions in the popular mind:--

"SAMSON MOHAMMEDAN.--At Miss Heraud's reading of 'Samson Agonistes,' the

Rev. Henry Allon, who presided, mentioned a fact illustrative of the way

in which tradition deals with ancient legends. As he stood on the site

of the Temple of Gaza, two learned Mussulmans assured Mr. Allon that

Samson was not a Jew but a Mussulman, and that he pulled down the

temple, not on the head of the Philistines, but on that of the assembled

Christians who had persecuted the Mohammedans."

I have before observed that the European languages referred to are _not

asserted to have sprang from the Sanscrit_, but that all, on the

contrary, have a common source. The Vedic hymns, however, are the oldest

preserved specimens of any of these cognate tongues.[39] Considerable

change must have taken place in the southern Aryan speech before the

period when they were written; yet they retain to a great extent,

reliable evidence of the common origin of the languages referred to. Max

Müller is very explicit on this subject. He says,--

"Even in the Veda, where _dyu_ occurs as a masculine, as an active noun,

and discloses the same germs of thought which in Greece and Rome grew

into the name of the supreme god of the firmament, Dyu, the deity, the

lord of heaven, the ancient god of light, never assumes any powerful

mythological vitality, never rises to the rank of a supreme deity. In

the earlier lists of Vedic deities, Dyu is not included, and the real

representative of Jupiter in the Veda is not Dyu, but Indra, a name of

Indian growth, and unknown in any other independent branch of Aryan

language. _Indra_ was another conception of the bright sunny sky, but,

partly because its etymological meaning was obscured, partly through the

more active poetry and worship of certain Rishis, this name gained a

complete ascendancy over that of Dyu, and nearly extinguished the memory

in India of one of the earliest, if not _the_ earliest, name by which

the Aryans endeavoured to express their first conception of the deity.

Originally, however, and this is one of the most important discoveries

which we owe to the study of the Veda--originally _Dyu_ was the bright

heavenly deity in India as well as in Greece."

The early mythology of the Aryans, and doubtless of all other savage

nations, was more or less a species of, perhaps unconscious,

anthropomorphism or a personification of the powers or forces of nature.

This is beautifully illustrated by a superstition yet existent among

the Ojibbeway Indians in North America. North-west of Fort Garry lies

the lake Manitobah, which has recently given its name to the new

province formed out of the Red River region. This name is derived from

the circumstance that a "mysterious voice" is said to be occasionally

heard at night in a small island in its midst. The Indians never

approach it, believing it to be the home of the Manitobah, or the

"Speaking God." The "voice" is said to result, as in the case of

Charybdis, from the beating of the waves upon the rocks and shingle of

the shore. One writer says:--"Along the northern coast of the island

there is a long low cliff of fine grained compact limestone, which,

under the stroke of the hammer, clinks like steel. The waves beating on

the shore at the foot of the cliff cause the fallen fragments to rub

against each other, and to give out a sound resembling the chimes of

distant church bells. This phenomenon occurs when the gale blows from

the north, and then, as the winds subside, low, wailing sounds, like

whispering voices, are heard in the air. Travellers assert that the

effect is very impressive, and they have been awakened at night under

the impression that they were listening to church bells."[40]

The kind of personification referred to would, in the case of primæval

man, have certainly but a very remote affinity to that conscious

artistic personification employed by the cultivated poets and sculptors

of after ages. Mr. G. W. Cox, in his "Mythology of the Aryan Nations,"

presents this distinction in very forcible language. He says,--

"The sun would awaken both mornful and inspiriting ideas, ideas of

victory and defeat, of toil and premature death. He would be the Titan,

strangling the serpents of the night before he drove his chariot up the

sky; and he would also be the being who, worn down by unwilling labour

undergone for men, sinks wearied into the arms of the mother who bore

him in the morning. Other images would not be wanting; the dawn and the

dew and the violet clouds would not be less real and living than the

sun. In his rising from the east he would quit the fair dawn, whom he

should see no more till his labour drew towards its close. And not less

would he love and be loved by the dew and by the morning herself, while

to both his life would be fatal as his fiery car rose higher in the sky.

So would man speak of all other things also; of the thunder and the

earthquake and the storm, not less than of summer and of winter. But it

would be no personification, and still less would it be an allegory or

metaphor. It would be to him a _veritable reality_, which he examined

and analysed as little as he reflected on himself. It would be a

sentiment and a belief, but in no sense a religion."

In other words, primæval savages did not work artistically, but simply

observed, thought, and expressed themselves in the only manner in which

they were able.

Kelly describes the usual course of a myth as "beginning in a figurative

explanation of meteoric facts, it next became a hieratic mystery, and

then descended from the domain of religion to that of magic and popular

story."

I have previously observed that the word "Edda," the title of the work

which records the wild mythical cosmogony of the Scandinavian race, (a

mixture of oriental and northern legend), means "Mother of Poetry."

Language itself is largely made up of figures of speech, or as Jean Paul

Richter says it is a "dictionary of faded metaphors," the original

meaning of which is fully understood but by the philologist. It is not

surprising, therefore, that the unknown should, under certain

conditions, be figuratively described by means of the known, or that

personifications of this class eventuated in the belief in absolute

personal existences, in the minds of doubtless well-meaning, but,

nevertheless, ignorant men. A few verses from H. H. Wilson's translation

of the Vedic hymns will show the nature of this personification:--

"Dyaus (Sky) father, and Prithivi (Earth) kind mother,[41] Agni

(Fire) brother, ye Vasus (Bright ones) have mercy on us."

. . . . . . . .

"How long is it that the dawns have risen? How long will they rise?

"Those mortals who beheld the pristine Ushas dawning have passed

away: to us she is now visible, and they approach who will behold

her in after times.

"Ushas, endowed with truth, who art the sister of Bhava, the sister

of Varuna, be thou hymned first of the gods.

"Unimpeding divine rites, although wearing away the ages of mankind,

the dawn shines the likeness of the mornings that have passed, or

that are to be for ever, the first of those that are to come.

"She shines upon us like a young wife, rousing every living being to

go to his work. The fire had to be kindled by men: she brought light

by striking down darkness.

"She rose up, spreading far and wide, and moving towards every one

she grew in brightness, wearing her brilliant garment. The mother of

the cows, the leader of the dogs, she shone gold-coloured, lovely to

behold.

"She, the fortunate, who brings the eye of the god, who leads the

white and lovely steed (of the sun), the Dawn was seen revealed by

her rays, with brilliant treasures she follows every one.

"Thou, who art a blessing when thou art near, drive far away the

unfriendly; make the pastures wide, give us safety. Remove the

haters, bring treasures, liaise up wealth to the worshipper, thou

mighty Dawn.

"Shine for us with thy best rays, thou bright Dawn, thou who

lengthenest our life, thou the love of all, who givest us wealth in

cows, horses, and chariots."

Max Müller thus further illustrates the process of the transition

referred to:--

"To us it is clear that the story of Zeus descending as a golden rain

into the prison of Danaê was meant for the bright sky delivering the

earth from the bonds of winter, and awaking in her a new life by the

golden showers of spring. Many of the stories that are told about the

love of Zeus for human and half human heroines have a similar

origin.[42] The idea which we express by the phrase, 'King by the grace

of God,' was expressed in ancient language by calling Kings the

descendants of Zeus. This simple and natural conception gave rise to

innumerable local legends. Great families and whole tribes claimed Zeus

for their ancestor; and as it was necessary in each case to supply him

with a wife, the name of the country was naturally chosen to supply the

wanting link in these sacred genealogies. Thus _Æacus_ the famous king

of _Ægina_, was fabled to be the offspring of Zeus. This need not have

meant more than that he was a powerful, wise, and just king. But it soon

came to mean more. Æacus was fabled to have been really the son of Zeus,

and Zeus is represented as carrying off Ægina and making her the mother

of Æacus.... It is said that Zeus in the form of a bull carried off

_Europâ_. This means no more if we translate it back into Sanscrit, than

that the strong rising sun (Vrishan) carries off the wide-shining dawn.

This story is alluded to again and again in the Veda. Now _Minos_, the

ancient King of Crete, required parents; so Zeus and Europâ were

assigned to him."

The fabled ravishment of Leda by Jupiter in the form of a swan is

capable of a like interpretation. Light clouds were called swans, and

Mr. Cox regards a white mist, in this instance, to form an equivalent to

the golden shower of the Danaê legend.

In like manner the myth which fabled that [OE]dipus married his mother

after murdering his father, is divested of its revolting features. It is

held to imply no more than that the sun destroys the darkness and sinks

at evening into the twilight from whence he sprung.

Max Müller, in his "History of Sanscrit Literature," points out that

similar meanings clearly underlie the Vedic myths. He says:

"It is fabled that Prajâpati, the Lord of Creation, did violence to his

daughter. But what does it mean? Prajâpati, the Lord of Creation, is the

name of the sun; and he is called so because he protects all creatures.

His daughter Ushas is the dawn. And when it is said that he was in love

with her, this only means that, at sunrise, the sun runs after the dawn,

the dawn being at the same time called the daughter of the sun, because

she rises when he approaches. In the same manner it was said that Indra

was the seducer of Ahalyâ, this does not imply that the god Indra

committed such a crime; but Indra means the sun, and Ahalyâ the night;

and as the night is seduced and ruined by the sun of the morning,

therefore is Indra called the paramour of Ahalyâ."

This throws a new and satisfactory light upon what has long been

regarded as a serious blot upon the morals of the ancient Greeks, as

exhibited by the conduct of the most exalted of the deities which figure

in their picturesque and poetic, but certainly not very decorous,

mythological theogony.

Mr. Ruskin, in his lecture on "Light," delivered at Oxford recently,

gives several excellent examples of Greek personifications of this

class. He concludes as follows:--

"Then join with these the Northern legends connected with the air. It

does not matter whether you take Dorus as the son of Apollo or the son

of Helen; he equally symbolises the power of light; while his brother

Æolus, through all his descendants, chiefly in Sisyphus, is confused or

associated with the real god of the winds, and represents to you the

power of the air. And then, as this conception enters into art, you have

the myths of Dædalus, the flight of Icarus, and the story of Phrixus and

Helle, giving you continual associations of the physical air and light,

ending with the power of Athena over Corinth as well as over Athens.

Now, once having the clue, you can work out the sequels for yourselves

better than I can for you; and you will soon find even the earliest or

slightest grotesques of Greek art become full of interest to you. For

nothing is more wonderful than the depth of meaning which nations in

their first days of thought, like children, can attach to the rudest

symbols; and what to us is grotesque or ugly, like a little child's

doll, can speak to them the loveliest things."

We have already seen, in Chapter X., that Lord Bacon regarded the great

mass of the Greek myths as allegories. Another ingenious mode of

interpreting the artistically beautiful mythology of the Greeks is

eloquently expressed by Wordsworth, in his poem, "The Excursion":--

In that fair clime, the lonely Herdsman, stretched

On the soft grass through half a summer day,

With music lulled his indolent repose;

And, in some fit of weariness, if he,

When his own breath was silent, chanced to hear

A distant strain, far sweeter than the sounds

Which his poor skill could make, his fancy fetched

Even from the blazing chariot of the Sun

A beardless youth who touched a golden lute,

And filled the illumined groves with ravishment.

The mighty Hunter, lifting up his eyes

Towards the crescent Moon, with grateful heart

Called on the lovely Wanderer who bestowed

That timely light to share his joyous sport,

And hence a beaming Goddess with her nymphs

Across the lawn and through the darksome grove

(Not unaccompanied with tuneful notes

By echo multiplied from rock or cave)

Swept in the storm of chase, as moon and stars

Glance rapidly along the clouded heaven

When winds are blowing strong. The traveller slaked

His thirst from rill or gushing fount, and thanked

The Naiad. Sunbeams upon distant hills

Gliding apace, with shadows in their train,

Might, with small help from fancy, be transformed

Into fleet Oreads sporting visibly.

The Zephyrs, fanning, as they passed, their wings,

Lacked not for love fair objects whom they wooed

With gentle whisper. Withered boughs grotesque,

Stripped of their leaves and twigs by hoary age,

From depth of shaggy covert peeping forth

In the low vale, or on steep mountain side;

And sometimes intermixed with stirring horns

Of the live deer, or goat's depending beard;

These were the lurking Satyrs, a wild brood

Of gamesome deities; or Pan himself,

The simple shepherd's awe-inspiring god.

This figurative or poetical element in the classical mythology would,

doubtless, be understood by the more cultured sections of the ancient

populations of the later period, at least to a certain extent. For

instance; Ovid distinctly states that under the name Vesta direct

reference is made to fire. Socrates, too, understood nothing more than

the north wind in the name Boreas. I have previously referred to the

statement of Diodorus Siculus, that although the mythographers spoke of

Prometheus stealing fire from heaven, they merely intended to imply that

he was the inventor of the "chark," or fire-producing instrument. Some,

if not all, of the earlier Greek writers, however, including Homer and

Hesiod, appear, like the mass of the populace, to have treated their

mythic personages as actual concrete beings.

Farrer, in his "Origin of Language," forcibly illustrates the figurative

character of much of our ordinary every-day speech. He says,--"The

continual metaphors by which we compare our thoughts and emotions to the

changes of the outer world--sadness to a cloudy sky, calm to the silvery

rays of the moonlight, anger to waves agitated by the wind--are not, as

Schelling observed, a mere play of the imagination, but are an

expression, in two different languages, of the same thought of the

Creator, and one serves to interpret the other. 'Nature is visible

spirit, spirit invisible nature.'"

Shakspere is supposed to have founded some portions of his Tempest on a

narrative of the shipwreck of Sir John Somers on one of the Bermuda

islands. These islands were then uninhabited by man, and generally

believed to be "enchanted." Old Stowe, in his "Annals," speaking of this

shipwreck, among other things, says these islands "were, of all nations,

said and supposed to be enchanted and inhabited with witches and

devills, which grow by reason of accustomed monstrous thunder, storms,

and tempests." One of Shakspere's commentators, referring to this

passage, says,--"This account by old Stowe of the elemental growth and

generation of the hags and imps and devils and abortions of the island,

is fearfully fine. Caliban and Sycorax and Setebos, might well be

imagined to have first glared into life through the long fermenting

incantation of 'accustomed monstrous thunder.'" Ruskin says "the whole

play of the Tempest is an allegorical representation of the powers of

true, and, therefore, spiritual, liberty, as opposed to true, and,

therefore, carnal and brutal, slavery. There is not a sentence nor a

rhyme sung or uttered by Ariel or Caliban throughout the play which has

not this under meaning."

Herbert Spencer has truly said, "We too often forget that not only is

there 'a soul of goodness in things evil,' but very generally also, a

soul of truth in things erroneous."

Thus, these despised and contemned traditionary superstitions of our

progenitors are found, nevertheless, to enshrine much valuable material,

by a careful study of which we may obtain a deeper insight into some of

the more subtle or hidden features of the human soul, the nature and

progress of man's intellectual growth, of the origin and development of

language as a medium of mental intercommunion, and of the true natural

basis on which rest some of the greatest triumphs of plastic and poetic

art that have astonished, delighted, and instructed mankind for

countless generations.

FOOTNOTES:

[36] Penny Cyclop., article Syntipas.--Syntipas is the "title of a

collection of stories written in Greek, and bearing the name of Michael

Andreopulos, but the collection is evidently translated from an Oriental

work.... Many of the stories of Syntipas are found in an Arabic

manuscript of the 'Arabian Nights,' in the British Museum. The whole

style of the stories points evidently to an Indian origin. The same may

be said of the collection named Pancha Tantra, the original of the

Fables of Pilpay, and some other Indian stories."

[37] Sir John Lubbock, in his "Pre-historic Times," says,--"Nor will

tradition supply the place of history. At best it is untrustworthy and

short-lived. Thus in 1770 the New Zealanders had no recollection of

Tasman's visit. Yet this took place in 1643, less than 130 years before,

and must have been to them an event of the greatest possible importance

and interest. In the same way the North American Indians soon lost all

tradition of De Soto's expedition, although 'by its striking incidents

it was so well suited to impress the Indian mind.'" This is no doubt

true in relation to many matters which leave behind no religious or

superstitious element. When this, however, is superadded, tradition

becomes, as Dasent expresses it, remarkable for its toughness, or

enduring vitality. Other authorities say, however, that on Cook's

arrival, the tradition of Tasman's visit was preserved amongst the

natives of the Tonga or Friendly Islands.

[38] This is denied, however, as we have already seen, by Mr. Baldwin,

who traces the ancient Ethiopians, as well as the Egyptians and

Ph[oe]nicians, from the Cushites of Arabia.

[39] In Chapter I. I have referred to the reported discovery by the

French _savan_, M. Lejean, of a spoken language between Kashmir and

Afghanistan containing older idioms than Sanscrit, and nearer in

affinity to the cognate European tongues. At a recent meeting of the

Philological Society, Professor Goldstücker mentioned, as a curious

fact, that, in old Sanscrit musical manuscripts, the word _laya_ occurs

with the same meaning as in French and English. The word _laya_ has not

yet found its way into any Sanscrit glossary.

[40] How charmingly this is illustrated by the childish faith with which

we have all placed large whelk or other univalve shells to the ear, and,

after listening with wonder for a time at the musical murmurings there

heard, exclaimed that the tide was then flowing landward. Wordsworth

refers to this in the following beautiful lines:--

... I've seen

A curious child, who dwelt upon a tract

Of inland ground, applying to his ear

The convolutions of a smooth-lipped shell,

To which, in silence hush'd, his very soul

Listened intently; for murmuring from within

Were heard sonorous cadences, whereby,

To his belief, the monitor expressed

Mysterious union with its native sea.

[41] May not this Prithivi be the forerunner of the Greek Dêmetêr and

the Roman Ceres, as well as of the harvest queen, or "kern-baby," and

the "mell-doll" of the autumnal festivals of the North of England?

[42] How beautifully and how truly has Eliza Cook expressed this

sentiment, without any reference to, or even knowledge of, the

philologist's interpretation of the Grecian or Aryan myth, in one

stanza, in her poem entitled "A Thing of Beauty is a Joy for ever":--

Oh! "beautiful for ever" is the sheen

Of April's sun, that, with a bridegroom's smile,

Nestles in nature's breast of balmy green;

With larks to sing a marriage song, the while

The "bridal of the earth and sky" is seen

Before the priest that bars all greed and guile;

With blissful promise there shall soon be born

Fair offspring in red grapes and yellow corn.

INDEX.

Abbeys, ruined, 290.

Abracadabra, 255.

Abury, 8.

Adonis, 160.

Æsir gods, the, 67, 169, 207.

Æsculapius (Asklêpios), 51, 135, 154.

Agni, 14, 16.

Ahi, the Dragon, 14, 41, 44, 47, 51.

Alchemy, 50.

Alisaunder, Kyng, romance, 47.

Allectricium, a precious stone, 135.

Allegorical theory of Greek Myths, 211, 298.

Allhalloween, 29.

Amara, lake, 23.

America, its ancient connection with Asia, 286.

Apollo, 241, 249, 298.

Apple howling, 66.

Arthur, King, 50, 161, et seq., 211, et seq., 241, 248, 272.

Aryan races, 2, 112, 162, 283, 289.

Ash trees, 68, 117, 150, 253, et seq.

Ashton black lad, 187, et seq.

Asuras, 23, 44.

Asvattha, 68, 257.

Asvins, 25.

Athenê, 245, 298.

Athenian ghost, 140.

Aubépine, see thorns.

Avalun, island of, 165.

Baal, Bel, 6, 10, 28, 31, 38, et seq., 57, 67, 83.

Baalbec, 8.

Baker's daughter, the, 235.

Baldr, 10, 67, 149, 159.

Ball-playing, Easter, 72.

Bargaist, 127.

Bean-geese, 182.

Bean-stalk, 68.

Beans, 68, 79, 225.

Bears, 231.

Beauty and the Beast, 224.

Belatucadrus, 11, 16.

Belisama, 6, 12, 15, 18.

Beltain fires, 31, 34, 83.

Beltane-day, 38.

Beowulf, 45, et seq., 213, 249.

Besoms, 96, 101, 116.

Bhrigus, 14.

Bible, divination by, 262.

Birds, lightning, 224, 235, 238, 242, et seq.

Birds, sacred and ominous, 67, 101, 132, 136, 157, 237, 242, et seq.

Black dog, see hound.

Black lad, Ashton, 187, et seq.

Blossoming staffs, 91.

Bluebeard, 195.

Boadicea's hare, 114.

Boars, 69, 111, 159, 163, 183, 255.

Boggart Ho' Clough, 128, 147, 151.

Boggarts, 124, et seq., 138, 184.

Bones, huge fossil, 110.

Bonfires, 30, 33, 40.

Book of Sports, 88.

Bottomless pools, 189, et seq, 213.

Boulders, erratic, 162, 221.

Boundary perambulation, 186.

Braggat Sunday, 78.

Brahmin temples at Java, etc., 290.

Bramham rocks, Yorkshire, 34, 223.

Brewing storms, 14, 17, 107, 114, 132, 156, et seq.

Brigantes, 5, 12.

Briony, 256.

Bronze age, 10, 44.

Broom, see besoms.

Brownies, 126.

Brutus and his Trojans, 5, 23, 197.

Buddhism, 4.

Bugbear, 128.

Bull or Bovine worship, 84, 112.

Buns, see cross-buns and cakes.

Bush (Inn sign), 117.

Cabalistic art, 119.

Cakes, 75, 77.

Calendar, the, 56.

Candles, Christmas and Easter, 55, 60, 71.

Carling Sunday, 78.

Carols, Christmas, 56.

Carr gulds, 186.

Castles, ruined, 290.

Cat, the white, 224.

Cats, 96, 114, 164, 224, 232, 233.

Cauldrons, 96, 107.

Cavalcade of the dead, 176.

Caverned heroes, 164, et seq.

Chark, 24, 35, 91, 208, 257, 285.

Charon, 15, 179.

Chasse Maccabei, 157.

Cheetham's, George, boggart, 128.

Cheshire May games, 90.

Chivalry, origin of, 221.

Chives, 272.

Christmas observances and superstitions, 53, et seq., 134, 144, 290.

Church-builders, goblin, 127.

Churches, sunken, 290.

Cinderella, 210.

Cloud-land, 68, 72.

Cloud-maidens, 18, 47, 97.

Cloud-water, 17, 110.

Coach, black, legend, 171, 192.

Coccium, 15.

Cocidius, 14.

Cockatrice, 136.

Cocks and hens, see fowls, barn door.

Colt-hole at Preston, 186.

Comets, 49.

Coral, 255.

Corpse candles, 266.

Country Justice in 1618, 105.

Cow-path, see milky-way.

Cows, dun, etc., 110, 112, 182.

Cows, heavenly, 47, 182.

Crickets, 274.

Crocodiles, 235.

Cromwell's castle battering, 290.

Cross-buns and crosses, 73, 75, 262.

Crows, 248.

Cuckoo, 235, 237, 245, et seq.

Cudgel, magic, 161.

Cuerdale hoard, 252.

Cushites, 6, 10, 203, 286, 289.

Cyclopean cities, etc., 203.

Cyclops, 203, 209.

Cymri, 13.

Darvell Gatheron, 37.

Davenport Brothers, 129.

Dawn, the, 47, 95, 111.

Dead, food for the, 61.

Deæ Matres, 107.

Dee, river, 21.

Demon pigs, 163.

Deva, 21, 44, 298.

Devil, 21, 97, 100, 130, 137, 144, 163, 178, 181, 190, 194, 206, 278,

289.

Dew, 94.

Diamonds, male and female, 94.

Divination, 30, 64, 91, 134, 155, see wish-rod, 218, 252, et seq.,

269, et seq.

Dogs, 130, 171, et seq., 240, 244.

Dorsocision, 288.

Dosmery pool, 189.

Dowzing rod, 263.

Dragon slayers, 43.

Dragons, 40, et seq., 80.

Druids, 6, 11, 29, 34, 67, 98, 221, 224, 246.

Dwarfs, 130, 139, 211, 222.

Eagles, 235, 238.

Easter superstitions and ceremonies, 70, et seq.

Eden, river, 18.

Egg, the, a sun-type, 71, 161.

Eggs, Easter, 71, 73, 114.

Elephants, fossil, 204.

Elves, 19, 25, 184.

Eôs, see dawn.

Equinox, vernal, 83.

Erratic boulders, 162, 221.

Evil, see king's evil.

Fairies, 92, 107, 124, et seq., 143.

Falcons, 257.

Familiar spirit, transfer of, 123.

Fates, the, 97.

Feathers, cock and pigeon, 138.

Fern-seed, 143, et seq., 258.

Fetiches, 240, 259.

Fire, need, 24, 36, 71.

Fire-worship, 9, 16, 28, 38, et seq., 267, 285.

Floralia, flowers, and well-dressing, 74, 83, 87, 93, 122, 275.

Fortune telling, 119.

Fossil bones, gigantic, 204.

Fowls, barn-door, 132, et seq., 253, 285.

Freyja, 19, 67, 113, 115, 149, 177.

Friday, Good, 75, 101.

Frost giants, 19, 26, 169, 231.

Furious host, 153, et seq.

Gabriel Ratchets, 153, 181.

Gaels, 5, 13.

Gallows, 160, 256.

Garland, the, 44, 87.

Geoffrey of Monmouth, 5, 22.

Gertrude's bird, 236.

Ghosts, 92, 130, 134, 140, 151, 171, 179.

Giants, 17, 111, 162, 186, 197, et seq., 290.

Gipsies, 118.

Gjallar bridge, and horn, 166, 182.

Glastonbury thorn, 91.

Gnostics, 43, 116.

Goblin church builders, 163.

Gogmagog, 199, 208.

Goodfellow, Robin, variations of, 124, 138.

Gorillas, 198, 239, 259.

Greenteeth, Jenny, 279.

Grendel, 46, 213.

Gunpowder Plot, 32.

Guy of Warwick, 110.

Hakelberg, 156, 162, 164.

Halloween, 30, 38.

Halter, magic, 233.

Hares, 96, 113, 228, 243.

Hart, white, 154, 177.

Harvest blaster, 41, 48.

Havelock the Dane, lay of, 77.

Hecate, 109, 115.

Hel or Hela, 177, et seq., 240.

Helmwind, the, 166.

Heorot (Hartlepool), 45, 191.

Heriot, 182, 194.

Heroes, caverned, 164, et seq.

Hobgoblin, 128.

Hopkins, witchfinder, 105.

Horseshoes, 38, 255.

Hound, Odin's, and the headless, 171, et seq., 192.

Howling dog, see hound.

Huli, Indian festival, 58, 85.

Humber, river, 24.

Huntsman, Spectre, 153, et seq., 290.

Idunn, the goddess of youth, 19.

Indra, 8, 16, 22, 41, 45, 153, et seq., 222, 298.

Invisibility, 80, 143, et seq.

Iron forgers, mythic, 281.

Ituna Estuarium, 18.

Jack and the Bean-stalk, 68, 71.

Jack, the Giant-killer, 210, et seq.

Jackdaws, 248.

Jew, Wandering, 157, et seq., 237.

Jewish temple at Ribchester, 292.

Kelpies, water, 278, 280.

King's evil, touching for, 81.

Kings, divine right of, 8, 81.

Kjökkenmöddings, 243.

Kuyava, the harvest spoiler, 41.

Lady-bird, 250.

Lake dwellings, 114, 276.

Lakes, sacred and medicinal, 276, et seq.

Lambton worm, 44.

Lent-Mid, Sunday, 76.

Lifting of women at Easter, 74.

Lituus, or Augur's staff, 261.

Lizards, huge fossil, 52.

Luck of Eden Hall, 19.

Lykanthropy, 240.

Magpies, 248, 250.

Maidens, imprisoned, 47.

Mandrakes, 144, 255.

Mare's nest, 114.

Marriage, 36, 67, 75, 91, 146.

Maruts, 19, 153, 176, 184, 188, 240.

May-day superstitions and ceremonies, 74, 83, et seq., 97, 113.

Mead, 17, 260.

Medicines, 50, 68, 80, 94, 102, 112, 136, 271, et seq.

Merlin, 48.

Mermaids, 231.

Mersey, river, 25.

Metempsychosis, 224, et seq.

Midsummer fires, 38.

Milesians, 13.

Milk, red cow's, 111.

Milky-way, 182, 238.

Mimosa catechu, 257.

Miocene flora, migration of, 288.

Mistletoe, 67, 149, 255.

Mithras, 9, 16, 43.

Moa, remains of, 52.

Monkey tribes, 197.

Monsters, see dragons and giants.

Moon and Sun, African notions of, 32.

Morris dancing, 88.

Mother goddesses, 107.

Mothering Sunday, 76.

Mysteries, moralities, or miracle plays, 72, 91.

Myths, growth of, 26, 98, 114, 159, 165, 176, 183, 209, 298, et seq.

Nativity, time of the, 55.

Need-fire, see fire.

New Year, 56, et seq.

New Year's day superstitions, 62.

New Year's gifts, 58.

Nickers, "Old Nick," 46, 73, 194, 208, 278.

Nightmare, 184, 233.

November fires, 32.

Oak, the, 67, 75.

Obolus, 179, 181.

Odin, 8, 14, 16, 19, 46, 75, 155, et seq., 279.

Ogres, 206, 222.

Oguisi (African spirit), 35, 169, 239.

Orion, 154.

Oromasdes, 9, 16.

Orpheus, 184.

Osmunda regalis, 149.

Owls, 193, 235, 243.

Pace-egging, 73.

Palm Sunday, 78.

Pani, 47, 220.

Pantomimes, 54.

Peas, 68, 78.

Pennygent, mountain, 18.

Personifications, mythical, 16, et seq., 183, 209, 298.

Phallic worship and emblems, 20, 36, 75, 83, 88, 92, 216, 262, 286.

Ph[oe]nicians, 6, 203.

Picumnus, 249.

Pilumnus, 249.

Pitris, or fathers, 139, 240.

Plague stones, 213.

Plants, lightning, 67, 69, 80, 144, et seq., 252, et seq.

Plovers, 237.

Poison, ordeal by, 122.

Polyphêmos, 210.

Predictions, or Prophecy, 49, 50, 65, 119, 245, 248.

Prometheus (Pramathas) 35, 249.

Puck, 124, et seq., 225.

Pyanots, 248.

Pythagoras, 79, 225.

Quetzalcoatle, Mexican god, 285.

Rain, 17, 23, 26.

Râkshasas (demons), 206.

Ramayana, 197.

Rats, 250.

Ravens, 165, 168, 247, et seq.

"Raw head and bloody bones," 131.

Red thread, berries, etc., 110, 112, 138.

Ribble, the, 6, 15, 18.

Ribhus, 25, 66, 184, 188.

Riding Hood, Little Red, 224, 241.

Rings, fairy, 141.

River worship, 18, 275, et seq.

Robin, 237, 242.

Roby's traditions, 128.

Rods, divining, etc., 91, 155, 252, et seq.

Round table, see table, round.

Rowan, see ash trees.

Rudra, 153, 247.

Rush-bearing, 71, 87.

Sailors' superstitions, 115, 116, 250.

St. John's eve, 39, 144.

St. John's-wort superstitions, 143, et seq.

Salt, 181.

Samson, a Mohammedan, 292.

Sangreal, 20, 217, 219.

Sanscrit, 3, 5, 293.

Seals, 231.

Seasons, wet and dry, 68, 282.

Secret passages, 290.

Semitic races, 2, 11, 112, 289.

Serpents, 24, 41, 45, 51, 286.

Sesha, serpent, 23, 44.

Setantii, 5, 14, 23.

Setantiorum, Portus, 10, 23.

Seven Whistlers, see whistlers.

Shere Thursday, 80.

Sieves, 96, 108.

Simnels, 76, et seq.

Skriker, 173, 175.

Solar myths, 43, 98, 208, 211.

Soma, 16, 18, 23, 31, 42, 44, 68, 108, 117, 257.

Soul bringers, 243, 249.

Souls, damned, wandering or unquiet, 158, 170, 179, 231.

Speaking god at Manitobah, 294.

Spectre huntsman, see huntsman.

Spectre-hound, see hound.

Spiritualism and Spirit-rapping, 96, 129, 131.

Springwort, see St. John's-wort.

Stone weapons, 10, 43, 162.

Stonehenge, 6.

Stork, 237, 242.

Storm brewing, 14, 17, 107, 132, 156, et seq.

Style, old and new, 58, 65.

Sun-dancing, 70, 83.

Sun-worship, 8, 28, 32, et seq., 57, 70, see Fire-worship.

Swallows, 243, 247.

Swan maidens, 19, 230.

Swords and spears, mythical, 161.

Table, round, 214, et seq., 262.

Taliesin, Romance of, 227.

Tarquin's castle at Manchester, 168, 213.

Teanla fires, 31, 34.

Templars, Knights, 116.

Thor, 16, 26, 57, 64, 75, 80, 92, 107, 150, 160, 242, 262.

Thorns, sacred, 69, 72, 86, 91, 258.

Three, magic number, 255, 273.

Thunder, Anglo-Saxon notions of, 42, 49.

Thunderstorms 49, 67, 156, et seq.

Tom Thumb, 222.

Torchlight processions, 34, 39.

Transmigration, 113, 222, 224, et seq., 289.

Trash, dog-fiend, 173.

Treasures, hidden or buried, 41, 46, 195, 252, 262.

Trees, sacred or lightning, 67, 252, 259.

Tregeagle, 187, et seq., 210.

Trident, 255, 257, 262.

Trimürtti or Triad, 16, 273.

Trolls, see giants.

Tyrant lord or magistrate, 187, et seq., 222, 290.

Underground passages, 291.

Urien, the Arthur of the North of England, 217.

Ushas, see dawn.

Vampires, 232.

Varuna, 14, 22, 26.

Vedas and Vedic literature, 3, 16, 295.

Vishnu, 41, 222.

Vritra, 14, 22, 41, 47, 161.

Wandering Jew, 157, et seq.

Wash, the, 26.

Wassail bowl, 60.

Wells and water, superstitions respecting, 80, 87, 267, et seq.

Were-wolves, 224, et seq., 289.

Whales' bones, 110, 111.

Wheel, sun type, 36, 40, 57.

Whinney moor, a soul path, 180.

Whistlers, seven, 157, 181, 237, 248.

White doe, 154, 237.

Whitsun ales, 88.

Wild huntsman, 19, 69, 153, 187, et seq.

Will-o'-whisp, 175.

Wish-rod, 91, 155, 252, et seq.

Wishtness, 155, 192.

Witchcraft, 38, 45, 73, 91, 96, et seq., 126, 133, 184, 232, et seq.,

255, 261, 274.

Woodpecker, 235, 236, 242, 248, et seq.

Wren, 237, 246.

Yggdrasil, or cloud tree, 68.

Yule tide and yule logs, 55, et seq., 85.

Zwergs, 80, 139.

[Decoration]

A. Ireland and Co., Printers, Manchester.

Traditions, Superstitions and Folk-lore (Chiefly Lancashire and the North of England:) Their Affinity to Others in Widely-Distributed Localities; Their Eastern Origin and Mythical Significance. · 第 15 / 15 章