CHAPTER II.

FIRE OR SUN WORSHIP AND ITS ATTENDANT SUPERSTITIONS.

Most glorious orb! thou wert a worship, ere

The mystery of thy making was reveal'd!

Thou earliest minister of the Almighty,

Which gladden'd, on their mountain tops, the hearts

Of the Chaldean shepherds, till they pour'd

Themselves in orisons! Thou material God!

And representative of the Unknown--

Who chose thee for his shadow!

_Byron._

Let us meditate on the adorable light of the divine ruler,

(Savitri, the sun); may it guide our intellects.

_Vedic Hymn._

In his own image the Creator made,

His own pure sunbeam quicken'd, thee, O man!

Thou breathing dial! Since thy day began

The present hour was ever markt with shade.

_W. Savage Landor._

I have said that some remains of the fire worship of Bel or Beil, until

very recently, might be found in Lancashire and the North of England, as

well as at present in Scotland and Ireland. Indeed, I am inclined to

think certain English customs of the peasantry, at the present day, may,

with perfect truthfulness, be referred to this source, although the

original objects of the ceremonies may have been, either wholly or in

part, obliterated by time, or obscured by the action of more recent

rites and traditional observances.

Amongst these may be instanced a superstition prevalent in the North of

England and many other places, that a funeral procession, when arrived

at the churchyard, must move in the sun's course; that is, from east to

west; otherwise evil resulted to the spirit of the departed. This

sentiment is not confined to religious ceremonies, but is respected when

passing the bottle in convivial assemblies; and in several other matters

of ordinary every-day life. The fact that Brand, and most of the earlier

writers after the Reformation, speak of these superstitions as "Popish,"

in no way invalidates the assignment to them of an Aryan origin. As

early as the eleventh century, in the reign of Canute the Great, we

find laws strictly prohibiting the people from worshipping, or

venerating, "the sun, moon, sacred groves and woods, and hallowed hills

and fountains." Decrees were again and again pronounced in vain against

many of these practices by the ecclesiastical authorities. In the canons

of the Northumberland clergy, quoted by Wilkins and Hallam, we read as

follows:--

"If a king's thane deny this (_the practice of heathen superstition_),

let twelve be appointed for him, and let him take twelve of his kindred

(or equals, _maga_), and twelve British strangers; and if he fail, then

let him pay for his breach of law, twelve half-marcs: if a landowner (or

lesser thane) deny the charge, let as many of his equals and as many

strangers be taken as for a royal thane; and if he fail, let him pay six

half-marcs: If a ceorl deny it, let as many of his equals and as many

strangers be taken for him as for the others; and if he fail, let him

pay twelve oræ for his breach of law."

This demonstrates that all classes, whatever their rank, found it

difficult to shake off the superstitions of their forefathers. Some of

them became amalgamated with more modern festive ceremonies, and were

eventually intermingled with the formulæ of the Christian worship

itself. Sir Jno. Lubbock, in his recent work, "The Origin of

Civilization and the Primitive Condition of Man," endorses this view. He

says: "When man, either by natural progress, or the influence of a more

advanced race, rises to the conception of a higher religion, _he still

retains his old beliefs, which long linger on, side by side with_, and

yet in utter opposition to, the higher creed. The new and more powerful

spirit is an addition to the old Pantheon, and diminishes the importance

of the older deities; gradually, the worship of the latter sinks in the

social scale, and becomes confined to the ignorant and the young. Thus a

belief in witchcraft still flourishes among our agricultural labourers

and the lowest classes in our great cities, and the deities of our

ancestors survive in the nursery tales of our children. We must,

therefore, expect to find in each race, traces--nay, more than

traces--of lower religions."

In the Irish Glossary of Cormac, Archbishop of Cashel, written in the

beginning of the tenth century, the author says, in his time "four great

fires were lighted up on the four great festivals of the Druids, viz.,

in February, May, August, and November." General Valancey says the Irish

have discontinued their November fires and substituted candles; while

the Welsh, though they retain the fire, "can give no reason for the

illumination." All Saints' Day is on the first of November, and its

vigil is termed Allhalloween, or Nutcrack night. Those festivals had

all reference to the seasons, and their influence on the fruitfulness of

the earth. Brand says "it is customary on this night with young people

in the north of England to dive for apples, or catch at them, when stuck

upon one end of a kind of hanging beam, at the other extremity of which

is fixed a lighted candle, and that with their mouths only, their hands

being tied behind their backs." Robert Burns tells us that Halloween is

thought to be a "night when witches, devils, and other mischief making

beings, are all abroad on their baneful midnight errands; particularly

those ærial people, the fairies, are said on that night to hold a grand

anniversary." Scotch girls, on this evening, pull, blindfolded, cabbage

stalks, in order to divine the size and figure of their future husbands.

Nuts are roasted or flung into the fire for a similar purpose both in

Scotland and England. Gay describes the latter ceremony as follows:--

Two hazel nuts I threw into the flame,

And to each nut I gave a sweetheart's name;

This with the _loudest bounce_ me sore amazed,

That in a _flame of brightest colour_ blazed;

_As blazed the nut so may thy passion grow_,

For 'twas thy nut that did so brightly glow!

We possess some interesting accounts of these gatherings in various

parts of Scotland during the latter portion of the last century. In

Perthshire, heath, broom, and dressings of flax were tied to poles,

lighted, and carried round the villages and fields. One minister says

the people "set up bonfires in every village. When the bonfire is

consumed, the ashes are carefully collected into the form of a circle.

There is a stone put in near the circumference, for every person of the

several families interested in the bonfire; and whatever stone is

removed out of its place or injured before the next morning, the person

represented by that stone is devoted, or _fey_, and is supposed not to

live twelve months from that day. The people received the consecrated

fire from the Druid priests next morning, the virtues of which were

supposed to continue a year." A similar authority says, "the custom of

making a fire in the fields, baking a consecrated cake, &c., on the 1st

of May is not yet quite worn out."

In Derbyshire these fires were called _Tindles_, and were kindled at the

close of the last century. In some localities the ceremony is called a

_Tinley_. Sir William Dugdale says, "On All-Hallow Even the master of

the family anciently used to carry a bunch of straw, fired, about his

corne, saying--

"Fire and red low

Light on my _teen low_."

In Lancashire they are called _tandles_ and _teanlas_. In Ireland

May-day eve is called _neen na Bealtina_, the eve of Bael fires. The

practice of divination by the roasting of nuts is yet common in

Lancashire. The hollow cinder, too, which leaps from a coal fire, is

supposed to augur wealth or death to the person against whom it strikes,

in proportion as its shape nearest resembles a purse or a coffin.

Mr. Thornber, the historian of Blackpool, and Mr. T. T. Wilkinson, of

Burnley, author of a series of valuable papers on Lancashire

superstitions published in the "Transactions of the Lancashire and

Cheshire Historic Society," have furnished some curious information of a

local character with reference to this ancient fire-worship. The latter

says:--"Such fires are still lighted in Lancashire, on Hallowe'en, under

the names of Beltains or Teanleas; and even the _cakes_ which the Jews

are said to have made in honour of the Queen of Heaven, are yet to be

found at this season amongst the inhabitants of the banks of the

Ribble.... Both the fires and cakes, however, are now connected with

superstitious notions respecting purgatory, &c., but their origin and

perpetuation will scarcely admit of doubt." He further observes:--"The

practice of 'causing children to pass through the fire to Moloch,' so

strongly reprobated by the prophet of old, may be cited as an instance

in which Christianity has not yet been able to efface all traces of one

of the oldest forms of heathen worship."

Mr. Thornber says:--"The conjoint worship of the sun and moon, the Samen

and Sama, husband and wife of nature, has been from these early times so

firmly implanted that ages have not uprooted it. Christianity has not

banished it.... In my youth, on Hallowe'en, under the name of Teanla

fires, I have seen the hills throughout the country illuminated with

sacred flames, and I can point out many a cairn of fire-broken

stones--the high places of the votaries of Bel--where his rites have

been performed on the borders of the Ribble age after age. Nor at this

day are these mysteries silenced; with a burning whisp of straw at the

point of a fork on Sama's festival at the eve of All-hallows, the farmer

in some districts of the Fylde encircles his field to protect the coming

crop from noxious weeds, the tare and darnel; the old wife refuses to

sit the eggs under her crackling hen after sunset; the ignorant boy sits

astride a stile, as he looks at the new moon; the bride walks not

widdershins to church on her nuptial moon; and if the aged parent

addresses not the young pair in the words of Hanno, the Carthaginian in

the P[oe]nula of Plautus, 'O that the good Bel-Samen may favour them,'

or, like the Irish peasant, 'The blessing of Sama and Bel go with you;'

still, we have often heard the benediction, 'May the sun shine bright

upon you,' in accordance with the old adage,

'Blest is the corpse the rain fell on,

Blest the bride on whom the sun shone.'"

M. Du Chaillu, in his recent "Journey into Ashango-land and further

penetration into Equatorial Africa," speaks of a certain superstitious

reverence for fire and faith in its medical virtues by the inhabitants

of the region he traversed. He relates the following beautiful story

respecting their astronomical notions:--"I was not always so solitary in

taking my nightly observations, for sometimes one and another of my men

or Mayola" (the king or chief), "would stand by me. Of course, I could

never make them comprehend what I was doing. Sometimes I used to be

amused by their ideas about the heavenly bodies. Like all other

remarkable natural objects, they are the subject of whimsical myths

amongst them. According to them, the sun and moon are of the same age,

but the sun brings daylight and gladness and the moon brings darkness,

witchcraft, and death--for death comes from sleep, and sleep commences

in darkness. The sun and moon, they say, once got angry with each other,

each one claiming to be the eldest. The moon said, 'Who are you, to dare

to speak to me? You are alone; you have no people. What! are you to

consider yourself equal to me? Look at me,' she continued, showing the

stars shining around her, 'these are my people; I am not alone in the

world like you.' The sun answered, 'Oh, moon, you bring witchcraft, and

it is you have killed all my people, or I should have as many attendants

as you.' According to the negroes, people are more liable to die when

the moon first makes her appearance and when she is last visible. They

say that she calls the people her insects and devours them. The moon

with them is the emblem of time and death."

The Teutonic tribes appear, contrary to the general faith of their Aryan

kindred, to have regarded the sun as a female and the moon as a male

deity. Palgrave, in his "History of the Anglo-Saxons," says:--"They had

an odd notion that if they addressed that power as a goddess, their

wives would be their masters."

I am strongly inclined to think that the continuance of the practice of

lighting bonfires on the 5th of November owes quite as much to the

associations connected with the ancient teanla fires of Allhalloween, as

to any present Protestant horror of the treason of Guy Fawkes and his

band of conspirators. It may be quite true that the House of Commons, in

February, 1605-6 did ordain that the 5th of November should be kept as

"_a holiday_ FOR EVER in thankfulness to God for our deliverance, and

detestation of the Papists;" but ordinances of this class seldom produce

more than a temporary excitement amongst large masses of the people. I

remember, in my youth, "assisting" at the celebration of several

"bonfire days" in Preston and its neighbourhood, sometimes as amateur

pyrotechnic artist, when we enjoyed our "fun" without any reference to

Protestant or Catholic proclivities. Few, except the better educated,

knew what the "Gunpowder Plot" really meant. Some associated it mainly

with our own pyrotechnic efforts and other attendant consumption of the

explosive compound, on the then special occasion. I rather fancy the

ancient November "Allhallow fires" have in their decadence, merged into

the modern "Gunpowder Plot" bonfires; and hence the reason why, in some

rural districts, they yet abound, while they are fast disappearing from

our more populous towns. I was surprised to find, when riding on an

omnibus from Manchester for about five miles on the Bury-road, on the

evening of a recent anniversary of this "holiday," that I could count,

near and on the horizon, fires of this description by the dozen, and

yet, while in Manchester, I had remained ignorant of the fact that

bonfire associations were influencing the conduct of any section of

society. The merging of one superstition, custom, habit, or tradition,

into another, is one of the most ordinary facts of history.

Mr. Richard Edwards, in his "Land's End District," gives a very graphic

account of the bonfires lighted up in Cornwall on _Midsummer eve_. Some

of the details sufficiently resemble those of our northern "gunpowder

plot" demonstrations to prove that a Guy Fawkes and an Act of Parliament

are not absolutely necessary to make a bonfire festivity attractive to

the descendants of the fire-worshippers of old. He says:--

"On these eves a line of tar barrels, relieved occasionally by large

bonfires, is seen in the centre of each of the principal streets in

Penzance. On either side of this line, young men and women pass up and

down, swinging round their heads heavy torches made of large pieces of

folded canvas steeped in tar, and nailed to the ends of sticks between

three and four feet long; the flames of some of these almost equal those

of the tar barrels. Rows of lighted candles, also, when the air is calm,

are fixed outside the windows or along the sides of the streets. In St.

Just and other mining parishes, the young miners, mimicking their

father's employments, bore rows of holes in the rocks, load them with

gunpowder, and explode them in rapid succession by trains of the same

substance. As the holes are not deep enough to split the rocks, the same

little batteries serve for many years.... In the early part of the

evening, children may be seen wreathing wreaths of flowers,--a custom in

all probability originating from the ancient use of these ornaments when

they danced around the fires. At the close of the fireworks in Penzance,

a great number of persons of both sexes, chiefly from the neighbourhood

of the quay, used always, until within the last few years, to join hand

in hand, forming a long string, and run through the streets, playing

'thread the needle,' heedless of the fireworks showered upon them, and

ofttimes leaping over the yet glowing embers. I have, on these

occasions, seen boys following one another, jumping through flames

higher than themselves. But while this is now done innocently, in every

sense of the word, we all know that the passing of children through fire

was a very common act of idolatry; and the heathen believed that all

persons, and all living things, submitted to this ordeal, would be

preserved from evil throughout the year."

I remember well the bonfire processions during election periods, at

Preston, above forty years ago, in the palmy days of the late Mr. Henry

Hunt. It is not improbable that a remnant of the old superstition

hovered about them; and that a latent belief in the "luck-bringing"

qualities of fire, to a slight extent, influenced their promoters.

A few years ago I visited, in company with Mr. Thornber, a field at

Hardhorn, near Poulton, and was shown by that gentleman some of the

stones yet remaining of what he has for many years regarded as the

remains of a very ancient Teanlea cairn. Some of the stones bore marks

of fire. The mound must, however, have been neglected for a length of

time, inasmuch as the shrewd old farmer who had destroyed it had no

recollection or traditionary knowledge respecting the use to which it

had been appropriated. But from the ashes and other indications of fire

which the upper portion of the cairn presented, the worthy husbandman

felt confident that "it hed bin a blacksmith's forge i' th' olden time."

Godfrey Higgins in his "Celtic Druids," asserts, on the authority of

Hayman Rooke, that "so late as the year 1786, the custom of lighting

fires was continued at the Druid temple at Bramham, near Harrowgate,

Yorkshire, on the eve of the summer solstice." The Bramham crags

referred to present a singularly curious specimen of the partial

disintegration of huge rocks belonging to the millstone grit series.

Their present peculiar forms are not now attributed by the learned to

human agency, in any marked degree at least, but to the denuding action

of water, frost, and other geological conditions or phenomena.

Nevertheless, from the wild and even weird aspect of the group and its

elevated site, it is by no means improbable that it has been used in

early times as a place of worship, or as the locality for the

performance of superstitious rites of the class referred to. Doubtless,

other localities of a similar character might be pointed out. "Beacon

Fell," near "Parlick Pike," and the "Tandle Hills," near Rochdale, may

have been used as places of public assembly, and for the performance of

similar superstitious observances. The same may be said of Ingleborough,

which yet exhibits remains of Keltic occupation.

This fire-worship, amongst a barbarous people, appears to have had by no

means a strange or unnatural origin. Mr. Walter Kelly, after a very

elaborate analysis, concludes that the Prometheus of the Greeks and the

Vedic Mâtarisvan are "essentially the same." "The elder fire-gods, Agni

and Rudra," he says, "had a troop of fire-kindling attendants, called

Pramathas or Pramâthas," and he regards Prometheus as the Greek form of

this word. He calls attention to the fact that Diodorus says of the

celebrated Titan, that "according to the mythographers he stole fire

from the gods, but that in reality he was the inventor of the

fire-making instrument." The discoverer of the chark, or "fire-drill,"

an instrument for obtaining fire by artificial means, would be so great

a benefactor to a people that had to suffer all the inconveniences

resulting from occasional fireless hearths, that we may well understand

why he should be invested by his astonished and delighted fellow-savages

with miraculous or supernatural powers.[11] Doubtless the production of

fire by the rubbing together of two pieces of dry timber preceded this

discovery, but, under many circumstances, the operation must have been a

most laborious one, and ofttimes impracticable. But with the "chark" the

result was nearly as certain as when flint, steel, and tinder were

employed for this purpose. It was a very simple instrument indeed, but

it has nevertheless exercised a marvellous influence on the destinies of

mankind. It consisted merely of a piece of soft dry wood with a hole

drilled in its centre, into which a rod of hard wood, ash, or oak, was

placed, and caused to revolve with rapidity by a cord, passed round it,

being pulled and slackened at each end alternately. A wheel and its axle

have hence become types of the sun and the thunderbolt. Fire produced in

this original way was considered sacred. Even the Greeks and Romans, as

well as the Kelts, and some Christian populations until recent times,

adopted the same or a similar process in the lighting of fires connected

with religious ceremonies. Mr. Kelly says "the Church has not quite yet

succeeded in effacing the vestiges of their heathen origin. This is

especially evident in the usages of many districts, where the purity of

the Easter fire (an idea borrowed from Pagan tradition) is secured by

deriving the kindling flame either from the consecrated Easter candles,

or from the new-born and perfectly pure element produced by the priest

from flint and steel." The Vedic chark was made from the wood of two

sacred trees; "the sami sprang from heavenly fire sent down to earth,

and the asvattha from the vessel which contained it." Kelly adds:--"The

idea of marriage, suggested by such a union of the two trees, is also

developed in the Veda with great amplitude and minuteness of detail, and

is a very prominent element in the whole cycle of myths connected with

the chark." Doubtless, we have here exposed the root of the entire

system of phallic worship, stripped of much, if not all, of the

grossness afterwards attendant upon it. It appears that amongst the

Peruvians, who were sun-worshippers, the great national festival was

held at the summer solstice. They collected the rays of that luminary in

a concave mirror, by which means they rekindled their fires. Sometimes,

indeed, they obtained their "need-fire" by friction of wood. Amongst the

Mexicans likewise grand religious celebrations took place at the close

of the fifty-second year, when the extinguished fires were rekindled "by

the friction of sticks." This is a very general practice amongst savage

tribes at the present day. Mr. Angus says some of the western tribes of

Australia "have no means of kindling fire. They say that it formerly

came from the north." Should that of one tribe unfortunately become

extinguished, there was nothing for it but journeying to a neighbouring

encampment and borrowing a light. The Tasmanians are in the same

predicament. The Fegeeans obtain fire by friction. So do other South Sea

Islanders, as well as many of the North American Indians. The Dacotahs

and Iroquois use an instrument not unlike the drilling bow at present

employed for a certain class of work in Europe. According to Father

Gabian, fire was utterly unknown to the natives of the Ladrone Islands

"till Magellan, provoked by their repeated thefts, burned one of their

villages. When they saw their wooden houses blazing, they first thought

the fire a beast which fed upon wood, and some of them, who came too

near, being burnt, the rest stood afar off, lest they should be devoured

or poisoned by this powerful animal."

The practice of kindling original or "need-fire" from a superstitious

reverence of its sacred character, is yet very common in various parts

of Germany, Scotland, and Ireland, and even in England. Mr. Kemble

quotes, from the Lanercost Chronicle, of the year 1268, a denunciation

by the pious writer, of a practice which "certain bestial persons, monks

in garb but not in mind," had taught the ignorant peasantry. This

practice consisted in the extraction of fire from wood by friction, and

the setting up of what he styles a "simulacrum Priapi," with a view to

protect their cattle from disease. This image of Priapus is supposed to

refer to the sun-god Fro or Fricco, who, according to Wolf, was

worshipped until a very recent period in Belgium, under the form of

Priapus. Priapus, the god of gardens or fertility, was the son of

Bacchus and Venus. In the more mountainous portions of Wales a remnant

of evidently heathen image-worship, of a somewhat similar character,

survived till relatively modern times. In the reign of Henry the Eighth,

an idol, or what old Fuller calls "a great lubberly image," was removed

from the diocese of St. Asaph, and publicly burnt in Smithfield. This

image was known by the name of "Darvell Gatheron;" and it was said that

the country people were in the habit of sacrificing oxen and sheep to

it. Hence its condemnation by the church authorities.

Grimm refers to a remarkable instance of this superstition, which

occurred in the island of Mull as recently as 1767, which vividly

illustrates the "toughness" of tradition, as Dasent expresses it. He

says:--"In consequence of a disease amongst the black cattle, the people

agreed to perform an incantation, though they esteemed it a wicked

thing. They carried to the top of Carnmoor a wheel and nine spindles,

long enough to produce fire by friction. If the fire were not produced

before noon, the incantation lost its effect. They failed for several

days running. They attributed this failure to the obstinacy of one

householder, who would not let his fires be put out for what he

considered so wrong a purpose. However, by bribing his servants, they

contrived to have them extinguished, and on that morning raised their

fire. They then sacrificed a heifer, cutting in pieces and burning,

while yet alive, the diseased part. They then lighted their own hearths

from the pile, and ended by feasting on the remains. Words of

incantation were repeated by an old man from Morven, who came as the

master of the ceremonies, and who continued speaking all the time the

fire was being raised. This man was living a beggar at Bellochroy. Asked

to repeat the spell, he said the sin of repeating it once had brought

him to beggary, and that he dared not say those words again." Many other

instances might be cited in Scotland and Ireland: but the one most to

the present purpose is related by Mr. T. T. Wilkinson, in which a

Lancashire man "unconsciously resorted to the old worship of Baal, and

consumed a live calf in a fire, in order to counteract the influences of

his unknown enemies." This individual was well known to Mr. Wilkinson.

He firmly believed that witchcraft was at the root of all his troubles,

and that his cattle had died in consequence of its spells. It appears he

had previously tried the famous Lancashire expedient to render his

stables and shippons proof against his supernatural enemies--the nailing

of horseshoes on all his doors--without obtaining the desired result;

so, in desperation, knowing the tradition, he sacrificed a living calf

to the fire-god Bel!

The following paragraph appeared in the _Pall Mall Gazette_, on the 29th

of June, 1867:--

"The accounts given by the Irish newspapers of the extent to which the

old superstition of fire-lighting on Midsummer eve still prevails show

how slowly the relics of Paganism disappear among country people, and

how natural it was that the old idolatries should come at last to be

known as the creed of the 'Pagana,' the dwellers in villages. These

Midsummer fires, lighted annually on the hills, are simply relics of the

worship of Bel. Beltane-day, or Belteine, is still a May-day as well as

a Midsummer festival in the more ignorant districts of Scotland as well

as of Ireland, and similar superstitious practices are connected with

the lighting of the fires; and, what is still more remarkable, the word

is still used in some Scotch almanacs as a term well-known to everybody.

In a number of the _Scotsman_ a few years ago appeared the announcement

that 'On Beltane-day Mr. Robertson was elected convener of the Trades of

Cannongate in Edinburgh.' The next year the following is to be

found:--'On Beltane-day the weavers, dyers, etc., of the Cannongate

re-elected their office bearers.'"[12]

The records of the Presbytery of Dingwall show that as recently as the

latter portion of the seventeenth century, on the island of Innis Maree,

in Loch Maree, bulls were offered up as a sacrifice, and milk offered on

the hill sides as a libation. In the year 1678, the Presbytery took

action against some of the Mackenzie family, "for sacrificing a bull in

a heathenish manner, in the island of St. Rufus, for the recovery of the

health of Cirstane Mackenzie, who was formerly sick and valetudinarie."

Mr. Henderson, in his "Folk-Lore of the Northern Counties," mentions an

instance, "within fifteen years ago," of "a herd of cattle, in that

county (Moray) being attacked with fever," when, "one of them was

sacrificed by burning alive, as a propitiatory offering for the rest."

Mr. Robert Hunt, in his "Drolls, Traditions, and Superstitions of Old

Cornwall," published in 1865, says that he has been informed "that

within the last few years a calf has been thus sacrificed by a farmer in

a district where churches, chapels, and schools abound." He afterwards

adds:--"While correcting these sheets I am informed of two recent

instances of this superstition. One of them was the sacrifice of a calf

by a farmer near Pontreath, for the purpose of removing a disease which

had long followed his horses and cows. The other was the burning of a

living lamb, to save, as the farmer said, 'his flocks from spells which

had been cast on 'em.'"

The Midsummer fires, at the vigil of St. John the Baptist, and the yule

log ceremonies at Christmas, may be referred to a similar origin. Brand

says:--"The Pagan rites of this festival (Midsummer Eve) at the summer

solstice may be considered as a counterpart of those used at the winter

solstice at Yule-tide." The wheel, the type of the sun, was common to

both festivities. Darand describes the practice, at the feast of St.

John, of rolling about a wheel, "to signify that the sun, then occupying

the highest place in the zodiac, was beginning to descend." The old

poet, Naogeorgus, describes the wheel as being covered with straw, which

was set on fire at the top of a high mountain, and then despatched on

its downward course. He adds that the people imagined all their ill luck

accompanied the wheel in its descent.

The writer of the old homily _De Festo Sancti Johannis Baptistæ_, when

referring to these observances, speaks of three fires being kindled, one

of which was called "a Bone fire; another is clene woode and no bones,

and that is called a Wode fire, for people to sit and wake thereby; the

third is made of wode and bones, and is called Saynt Johanny's Fyre.[13]

The first fyre, as a great clerke, Johan Belleth, telleth he saw in a

certayne countrey, so in the countrey there was soo greate hete the

which causid that dragons to go together in tokenynge that Johan dyed in

brennynge love and charyté of God and man.... Then as these dragons

flewe in th' ayre, they shed down to the water froth of ther Kynde, and

so envenymed the waters, and caused moche people for to take theyr deth

thereby, and many dyverse sykenesse. Wyse clerkes knoweth well that

dragons hate nothyng more than the stenche of brennynge bones, and

therefore they gaderyd as many as they mighte fynde, and brent them; and

so with the stenche thereof they drove away the dragons, and so they

were brought out of greete dysease."

Brand regards this as a "pleasant piece of absurdity;" but it appears

that the quaint old writer, after all, is but relating that which was

believed to be true in his own age, and which after-gained knowledge

enables us to distinguish as a remnant of the old Aryan superstition or

myth, in a mediæval dress. These rolling fiery wheels, burning brands,

bonfires, and processions round fields, &c., are common to both the

Keltic and Teutonic branches of the Aryan race, and have evidently a

similar origin. Kemble quotes an ancient Latin MS., which he found

among the Harleian collection, which gives a precisely similar

description of the St. John's fires. It is not improbable that it may

have been written by the "learned clerke Johan Belleth," to whom the

writer of the homily refers. Walter Kelly, speaking of it says, "Here we

have again the primitive Aryan dragon Ahi, at his old work in the sultry

midsummer weather." He contends that all the details referred to, as

attendant on the St. John's fires, have been demonstrated by Dr. Kuhn to

be "in striking accordance with the Vedic legend of Indra's fight with

the midsummer demons. The passage quoted by Kemble, besides stating

expressly that the course of the blazing wheel was meant to represent

the descent of the sun from its solstitial height, brings the St. John's

fires in immediate connection with the dragons that poison the waters,

just as did the demon Vritra, otherwise called Ahi, the dragon. He

possessed himself of the sun-wheel and the treasures of Heaven, seized

the (white) women, kept them prisoners in his cavern, and laid a curse

on the waters, until Indra released the captives and took off the curse.

The same conception is repeated in countless legends of mountains that

open on St. John's day, when the imprisoned white women come forth, and

the hour approaches in which the spell laid upon them and upon the

buried treasures will be broken.... Here we see at once that the German"

(and Keltic) "custom was nothing else than a dramatic representation of

the great elemental battle portrayed in the sacred books of the southern

Aryans. In the one the blazing wheel stands on the top of the hill, in

the other the sun stands on the summit of the cloud mountain. Both

descend from their heights, and both are extinguished, the sun in the

cloud sea, behind the cloud mountain, the wheel in the river at the foot

of the hill." One name given to a combatant on the dragon's side is

Kuyava, which is interpreted the "harvest spoiler, or the spoiled

harvest." The following passage in the Rig Veda is uttered by Indra,

when he resolves to destroy the monster,--"Friend Vishnu, stride vastly;

sky give room for the thunderbolt to strike; let us slay Vritra and let

loose the waters." His worshippers likewise exclaim,--"When, thunderer,

thou didst by thy might slay Vritra, who stopped up the streams, then

thy dear steeds grew."

The Rev. G. W. Cox says:--"The Nemean lion is the offspring of Typhon,

Orthros, or Echidna; in other words it is sprung from Vritra, the dark

thief, and Ahi, the throttling snake of darkness, and it is as surely

slain by Heracles as the snakes which had assaulted him in his cradle.

Another child of the same horrid parents is the Lernaian Hydra, its

very name denoting a monster who, like the Sphinx or the Panis, shuts up

the waters and causes drought. It has many heads, one being immortal, as

the storm must constantly supply new clouds, while the vapours are

driven off by the sun into space. Hence the story went that although

Heracles could burn away its mortal heads, as the sun burns up the

clouds, still he can but hide away the mist or vapour itself, which at

its appointed time must again darken the sky."

Dr. Kuhn contends that the clothing of wheels with straw and the

extinguishing of them when set on fire by immersion in a river, as is

done in the vine-growing districts of Germany, with the view to secure a

good harvest, is to be referred to this source. In support of his view,

he enters into an elaborate philological argument to show that _yava_

must have originally meant grass in general, afterwards cereal grasses,

and that its root gave birth to the name of the grain from which the

oldest bread-stuff known was made. He says--"But I go still further, and

I believe that _Kuyava_ was also regarded as the spoiler of vegetation

in general, who parched up the plants used in making the fermented

liquor, soma, and amongst these plants the Hindus included _yava_,

which, in this case, meant barley or rice. It will be seen in the sequel

that the demon possesses himself also of the heavenly soma (the moisture

of the clouds), that he is robbed of it by Indra, and that the like

conception is found also among the Greeks and the Germans. This, then,

sufficiently explains the hope of a good wine year, which was associated

with the victory in the above-described German customs."

The Venerable Bede, in his treatise on the "Nature of Things," gives us

what may be termed the scientific view respecting rain and lightning

which obtained about his time. It is singularly in accordance with Dr.

Kuhn's interpretation of the myth now under consideration. He says:--

"Lightning is produced by the rubbing together of clouds, after the

manner of flints struck together, the thunder occurring at the same

time, but sound reaches the ears more slowly than light the eyes. For

all things the collision creates fire. Some say that while air draws

water in vapour from the depths, it draws also fire heat-wise, and by

their contact the horrid crash of thunder is produced; and _if the fire

conquer, it will be injurious to fruits; if water beneficial_; but that

the fire of lightning has so much the more penetrative power, from being

made of subtler elements than that which is in use by us."

It is merely necessary that the rhetorical figure, personification, be

freely applied to this passage, with due reverence towards the ancient

superstitions, and the mythic element which lies at the root of these

singular customs is reproduced.

It is evident the whole have reference to the influence of the burning

heat of the midsummer sun, which induces long droughts, and parches the

soil and the vegetation; and to the delight engendered when that heat is

mitigated, and the scorched earth is again rendered fruitful by copious

showers, the product of the thunderstorm. And to this source, Mr. Kelly

justly contends, may be referred all the supernatural dragon stories of

our nurseries, whether fought "by Pagan or Christian champions, from

Apollo, Hercules, and Siegfried, down to St. George, and to that modern

worthy More, of Morehall,

Who slew the dragon of Wantley."

The learned Pettingall has shown that the dragon slain by the English

champion and patron, St. George, was, by the ancient Orientals, engraved

on amulets, and that it was intended to symbolise the virtues of

Mithras, the sun. He says, "From the Pagans the use of these charms

passed to the Basilidians, and in their Abraxas, the traces of the

antient Mithras and the more modern St. George, are equally visible. In

the dark ages, the Christians borrowed their superstitions from the

heretics, but they disguised the origin of them, and transformed into

the saint the sun of the Persians and the archangel of the

Gnostics."[14]

Dr. Wilson, when speaking of the art examples pertaining to what is

termed, in Western Europe, the "Stone age," says,--

"In no single case is any attempt made to imitate leaf or flower, bird,

beast, or any simple, natural object; and when in the bronze work of the

later Iron period, imitative forms at length appear, they are chiefly

the snake and dragon shapes and patterns, borrowed seemingly by Celtic

and Teutonic wanderers, with the wild fancies of their mythology, from

the far Eastern cradle-land of their birth."

Marsden, in his "History of Sumatra," says that during an eclipse, the

natives make "a loud noise with sounding instruments, to prevent one

luminary from devouring the other, as the Chinese, to frighten away the

dragon, a superstition that has its source in the ancient systems of

astronomy (particularly the Hindu), where the nodes of the moon are

identified with the dragon's head and tail."

The dragon was the standard of the West Saxons, and of the English

previous to the Norman Conquest. It formed one of the supporters of the

Royal arms borne by all our Tudor monarchs, with the exception of Queen

Mary, who substituted the eagle. Several of the Plantagenet kings and

princes inscribed a figure of the dragon on their banners and shields.

Peter Langtoffe says, at the battle of Lewis, fought in 1264:--

"The King (Henry III.) schewed forth his schild his Dragon full

austere."

Another authority says the said king ordered to be made "a dragon in the

manner of a banner, of a certain red silk embroidered with gold; its

tongue like a flaming fire must always seem to be moving; its eyes must

be made of sapphire, or of some other stone suitable for that purpose."

Notwithstanding the transformations which several of them may have

undergone from relatively modern local influences, there can be little

doubt the fiery-dragon and the numerous huge-worm traditions of the

North of England enshrine relics of Aryan superstitions. Besides the

dragon Ahi, we have the Vedic great serpent Sesha, to which reference

has been made in the first chapter of this work. We find the Dêvas, when

at war with their enemies the Asuras, agreed to a truce in order that

they might "churn the ocean," and so procure some soma or drink of the

gods, or milk the heavenly cows (the clouds) wherewith to slake their

grievous thirst. They coiled this great serpent around a hill or

mountain in the sea, and used him as a rope under whose action the hill

spun rapidly round until the heavenly liquor (rain water) was procured

in sufficient quantity. The famous Lambton worm, when coiled round a

hill, was pacified with copious draughts of milk, and his blood flowed

freely when he was pierced by the spear heads attached to the armour of

the returned crusader.[15] The Linton worm coiled itself round a hill,

and by its poisonous breath, destroyed the neighbouring animal and

vegetable life. The knight who destroyed it used burning pitch in the

operation. The contractions of this huge worm in dying, are said to have

left indented spiral lines on the sides of Warmington hill. The Pollard

worm is described as "a venomous serpent which did much harm to man and

beast," while that of Stockburn is designated as the "worm, _dragon, or

fiery flying serpent_ which destroyed man, woman, and child." These

worms were said to have been slain by the spears or swords of knights,

evidently modern substitutes for the thunderbolt of Indra, the ancient

Aryan "god of the firmament." A _bonâ fide_ slain worm, however, seems

from the records to have been a very small affair in comparison with the

gigantic monsters of the Durham traditions. Towards the end of the

seventeenth century, a writer of the family history of the Somervilles,

referring to the worm which John Somerville slew, in the reign of

William the Lion, avers that it was "in length three Scots yards, and

somewhat bigger than an ordinary man's leg, with a head more

proportionable to its length than greatness, in form and colour like to

our common muir-edders." As the valour of Indra fertilised the earth; so

virtue of a similar quality in a high degree procured broad lands for

the earthly champion, from his grateful sovereign.

It is by no means improbable, if, as Mr. D. Haigh contends, in his

"Conquest of Britain by the Saxons," the scene of the fine old

Anglo-Saxon poem Beowulf, was near Hartlepool, in the county of Durham,

that these monster worm traditions of the north of England may be the

remains of the mythic superstitions therein embodied.[16] The giant and

sprite Grendel, the "Ghost-slayer," and his equally sanguinary mother,

are evidently personifications of evil influences. After Beowulf had

despatched the male monster, he proceeded to the pool, in the _depths of

which_ he successfully contended with the female. As he and his

followers sat in the deep shadow of the wood overhanging the

"_bottomless_" pool "they saw along the water many of the _worm-kind_,

strange _sea dragons_, also in clefts of the ness Nickers lying."

Professor Henry Morley, in his "English Writers," gives a summary of the

poem, the following passage in which demonstrates the great antiquity of

this superstition:--

"Afterward the broad land came under the sway of Beowulf. He held it

well for fifty winters, until in the dark nights a dragon, which in a

stone mound watched a hoard of gold and cups, won mastery. It was a

hoard heaped up in sin, its lords were long since dead; the last earl,

before dying, hid it in the earth-cave, and for three hundred winters

the _great scather_ held the cave, until some man, finding by chance a

rich cup, took it to his lord. Then the den was searched while the worm

slept; again and again when the dragon awoke there had been theft. He

found not the man, but _wasted the whole land with fire_; nightly, the

_fiendish air-flyer made fire grow hateful_ to the sight of men. Then it

was told to Beowulf.... He sought out the dragon's den and fought with

him in awful strife. One wound the poison-worm struck in the flesh of

Beowulf.... Then, while the warrior-king sat deathsick on a stone, he

sent his thanes to see the cups and dishes in the den of the dread

twilight-flyer.... He said, 'I for this gold have wisely sold my life;

let others care now for the people's need. I may be here no longer.'"

Mr. John Mitchell Kemble, who published an amended prose translation of

Beowulf, in 1833, considered the poem to be founded upon legends which

existed anterior to the conquest of the northern part of Britain by the

Angles. Beowulf he regarded as the name of a god, one of the ancestors

of Woden, and who appears in the poem "as a defender, a protecting and

redeeming being." The hero belonged to the tribe of Geáts or Goths. This

word etymologists trace to the Anglo-Saxon geótan and geát, which imply

a pouring forth. One of Odin's names amongst the gods, according to the

Edda, was Gautr, the god of abundance. The monster Grendel is thus

described in the English summary of the poem by Professor Henry

Morley:--

"The grim guest was Grendel, he that held the moors, the fen, and

fastness. Forbidden the homes of mankind, the daughters of Cain brought

forth in darkness misshapen giants, elves, and orkens, such giants as

long warred with God, and he was one of these." The reference to the

daughters of Cain would seem to suggest an interpolation by a

transcriber after the introduction of Christianity.

Geoffrey of Monmouth relates a story of a certain mythic King of

Northumbria named Morvidus, who was less fortunate than Beowulf,

inasmuch as he lost his life, and gained nothing for his people by its

sacrifice. But then, we are informed, he "was a most cruel tyrant." It

appears that the land north of the Humber was invaded in great force by

a king of the Moreni (near Boulogne). He was defeated by Morvidus, who

abused his victory by the most monstrous acts of cruelty. Whilst thus

engaged, Geoffrey informs us that "there came from the coasts of the

Irish Sea a most cruel monster, that was continually devouring the

people upon the sea coasts. As soon as he heard of it, he ventured to go

and encounter it alone. When he had in vain spent all his darts upon it,

the monster rushed upon him, and with open jaws swallowed him up like a

small fish."

These dragon monsters are often found in connection with imprisoned

maidens, and treasures buried in caves or the inner recesses of

mountains. Some mythographers regard the maiden as a personification of

the dawn imprisoned by the darkness of the night, and afterwards freed

by the rays of the sun. In the Vedic myths, besides Ahi, the throttling

snake, and Vritra, the dragon, there is Pani, the thief and seducer, who

stole the cows of Indra from their heavenly pastures, hid them in his

dark cloud cave, and attempted to corrupt Sarama (the dawn), when, at

the bidding of the lightning-god, she demanded the restoration of the

plundered cattle. Max Müller, the Rev. G. W. Cox, and others, contend

that these incidents underlie most of the mythical epics of all the

Aryan nations. They say that the siege of Troy, even, "is a reflection

of the daily siege of the East by the solar powers that every evening

are robbed of their brightest treasures in the West."

The celebrated mediæval metrical romance, "Kyng Alisaunder," translated

into English verse, in the thirteenth century, by an unknown author, is

a complete _repertoire_ of these dragon, worm, and monster

superstitions. According to it, the hero was the son of a magician who

appeared to his mother in the form of a great dragon of the air. At his

birth "the earth shook, the sea became green, the sun ceased to shine,

the moon appeared and became black, the thunder crashed." The original

is said to have been written by Simeon Seth, keeper of the imperial

wardrobe at Constantinople, about the year 1060. It is founded on

Oriental legends, and was translated and enlarged into Latin and French

before the English version appeared. Many of its monstrosities are

evidently degraded forms of Grecian and other Aryan myths.

The celebrated prophecy of Merlin, in Geoffrey of Monmouth's "History of

Britain," is full of malignant dragons, white and red, which fight

furiously, and "cast forth fire with their breath." The red dragon, in

one instance, the prophet says, "shall return to his proper manners, and

turn his rage upon himself. Therefore shall the _revenge of the

Thunderer show itself, for every field shall disappoint the husbandman_.

Mortality shall snatch away the people, and make a desolation over all

countries."

Dragons, huge worms, and serpents appear frequently to be confounded in

Merlin's prophecy.[17] One sentence reads thus: "She shall be

encompassed with the adder of Lincoln, who with a horrible hiss shall

give notice of his presence to a multitude of dragons. Then shall the

dragons encounter and tear one another to pieces. The winged shall

oppress that which wants wings, and fasten its claws into the poisonous

cheeks." In another instance, the Aryan dragon, or harvest destroyer, is

very apparent. Merlin says:--"To him shall succeed a husbandman of

Albania, at whose back shall be a serpent. He shall be employed in

ploughing the ground, that the country may become white with corn. _The

serpent shall endeavour to diffuse his poison, in order to blast the

harvest._" Again he says:--"There shall be a miserable desolation of the

kingdom, and the floors of the harvests shall return to the fruitful

forests. The white dragon shall rise again, and invite over a daughter

of Germany. Our gardens shall be again replenished with foreign seed,

and the red one shall pine away at the end of the pond. After that shall

the German worm be crowned, and the brazen prince buried." Merlin's red

and white dragons are intended directly to personify the British and

Saxon races of men, as the red and white roses in after time served as

emblems of the houses of Lancaster and York; but the origin of the

mythic form of expression is very apparent.

The _Saxon Chronicle_ contains a paragraph under the date 793, which

illustrates the power of this superstition in the North of England at

that period. The passage itself likewise supplies sufficient evidence to

connect its interpretation with the Aryan myth under consideration. We

read: "A. 793. This year dire forewarnings came over the land of the

North-humbrians, and miserably terrified the people; these were

excessive whirlwinds and _lightnings_; and _fiery dragons_ were seen

flying in the air. _A great famine soon followed these tokens._"

Mr. Baring-Gould says,--"In a Slovakian legend the dragon sleeps in a

mountain cave through the winter months, but at the equinox bursts

forth. 'In a moment the heaven was darkened and became black as pitch,

only illumined by the fire which flashed from the dragon's jaws and

eyes. The earth shuddered, the stones rattled down the mountain sides

into the glens; right and left, left and right, did the dragon lash his

tail, overthrowing pines and bushes, and snapping them as reeds. He

evacuated such floods of water that the mountain torrents were full. But

after a while his power was exhausted; he lashed no more with his tail,

ejected no more water, and spat no more fire.'" Mr. Gould adds,--"I

think it impossible not to see in this description a spring-tide

thunderstorm."

The following paragraph, published in the _Calcutta Englishman_ last

year (1871), demonstrates that this class of superstition still lingers

in India:--

"AN ASTRONOMICAL PREDICTION.--The _Urdu Akhbar_ says that Maulvi

Mohammed Salimuz-yaman, the famous astronomer of Rampur, whose

deductions have generally turned out right, has foretold that in the

coming year (1872) a blaze of light resembling a shooting star, the like

of which no mortal has yet seen, will be visible in the sky. 'It will

dazzle the eyes of the people of particular places with lustre, and,

after remaining for a _ghari_ (_i.e._, 24 minutes), will vanish. The

direction in which it will make its appearance will be the North Pole,

and accordingly the people of northern countries will see it distinctly.

Probably the natives of China and Persia will likewise have a sight of

it. The effect of this meteor will be that the extent of the globe over

which its light will fall will be visited by famine during the year, and

a large number of the people inhabiting it will be destroyed, while

vegetation will be also scanty.'"

Veritable comets appear to have at times been confounded with these

fiery dragons. On the death of Aurelius Ambrosius, brother to Uther,

father of the renowned Arthur, according to Geoffrey of Monmouth,

"there appeared a star of wonderful magnitude and brightness, darting

forth a ray, at the end of which was a globe of fire, in form of a

dragon, out of whose mouth issued two rays, one of which seemed to

stretch out itself beyond the extent of Gaul, the other towards the

Irish sea, and ended in seven lesser rays."

Geoffrey further informs us that, after Uther's first great victory,

"remembering the explanation which Merlin had made of the star above

mentioned, he commanded two dragons to be made of gold, in likeness of

the dragon which he had seen at the ray of the star. As soon as they

were finished, which was done with wonderful nicety of workmanship, he

made a present of one to the cathedral church of Winchester, but

reserved the other for himself to be carried along with him to his wars.

From this time, therefore, he was called Uther Pendragon, which, in the

British tongue, signifies the dragon's head; the occasion of this

appellation being Merlin's prediction, from the appearance of the

dragon, that he should be king." The same "historical" romancer likewise

informs us that the redoubtable Arthur himself, after he had embarked at

Southampton, on his expedition against Rome, about midnight, during a

brisk gale, in a dream, "saw a bear flying in the air, at the noise of

which all the shores trembled; also a terrible dragon flying from the

west, which enlightened the country with the brightness of its eyes.

When these two met they began a dreadful fight; but the dragon, with its

fiery breath, burned the bear which often assaulted him, and threw him

down scorched to the ground." This, of course, was interpreted to augur

Arthur's victory over the Emperor. Singularly enough, as has been before

observed, we find, in authentic history, that the "Golden Dragon" was

the standard of the _Saxon_ kings of Wessex. When Cuthred defeated

"Ethelbald the Proud," King of Mercia, at Beorgforda (Burford, in

Oxfordshire), in 752, "the golden dragon, the ensign of Wessex," was

borne by his general, Ethelhun, termed "the presumptuous alderman,"

owing to a previous unsuccessful act of rebellion.

Dragon superstitions appear to have been earnestly believed by mediæval

alchemists, and even early chemists and physicians. An old German work

on alchemy (1625) informs us, as "a great wonder and very strange," that

the dragon contains the greatest "medicament," and that "there is a

dragon lives in the forest who has no want of poison; when he sees the

sun or fire he spits venom, which flies about fearfully. No living

animal can be cured of it; even the basilisk does not equal him. He who

can properly kill this serpent has overcome all his danger. His colours

increase in death; physic is produced from his poison, which he

entirely consumes, and eats his own venomous tail. This must be

accomplished by him, in order to produce the noblest balm. Such great

virtue as we will point out herein that all the learned shall rejoice."

The poison spitted out on sight of the sun or fire is evidently

analogous to the breath of the Aryan dragon Ahi, who scorched the earth.

The conqueror of the said dragon takes the place of Indra, who, by

discharging his lightning spear into the rain cloud, subdues the

monster, and converts his poison (excessive heat), into a medicine or

balm, which aids in the fertilisation of the earth.

This is in accordance with the Greek legend, which asserted that

Æsculapius or Asklêpios, the god of medicine, "wrought his wonderful

cures through the blood of Gorgo." Hence the serpent became his symbol.

At Epidaurus the god was supposed to manifest himself in the form of a

yellowish brown snake, abundant in that neighbourhood. It frequented the

temple, was large in size, but harmless and easily tamed. The Rev. G. W.

Cox, says, "throughout Hellas, Asklêpios remained the healer and

restorer of life, and accordingly the serpent is everywhere his special

emblem, as the mythology of the Linga would lead us to expect." Again he

says, "the symbol of the Phallos in its physical characteristics

suggested the form of the serpent, which thus became the emblem of life

and healing, and as such appears by the side of the Hellenic Asklêpios,

and in the brazen crucified serpent venerated by the Jewish people until

it was destroyed by Hezekiah."

According to the Edda, the Scandinavians believed that after the various

gods had, for a considerable time, alternately overthrown each other,

the "fiery snake" would consume "universal nature with all-destroying

flames." The word "Edda" means "Mother of Poetry." The contents of the

Edda have been styled "half oriental and half northern."

Remains of ancient serpent worship have been recently discovered in

America and in Scotland. Some writers indeed regard the temples at Abury

and Stonehenge as belonging to this class. One in North America,

described by Mr. Squier, is a mound 700 feet long, fashioned in the form

of a serpent. At the recent meeting of the British Association in

Edinburgh, Mr. John S. Phené, F.G.S., described a mound of this

character, which he had discovered in Argyleshire. A large cairn forms

the head of the monster, which is 300 feet in length. The spinal column,

with its sinuous windings, is distinctly marked out by carefully

adjusted stones, now covered with peat. To detect the exact form of the

entire reptile, it is necessary that the whole should be seen at one

view from above. A megalithic chamber was found beneath the head of the

serpent, or saurian, which contained burnt earth and bones, charcoal,

and charred nutshells, and a flint implement with the edge serrated like

a saw. The mound is described as being in a remarkably perfect

condition, considering its great antiquity.

Some writers, and notably one, some years ago in "Chambers's Journal,"

discoursing on dragon superstitions, have suggested, as remains of the

traditionary Moa of New Zealand is still said to be found in some

portions of the islands, that our early ancestors may have had a slight

knowledge of the existence of some of the huge saurian reptiles, known

to us geologically in the fossil condition. This attempt to give a

naturalistic solution of the problem at first sight is very plausible;

but it falls to the ground at once, when the nature of geological time

is taken into consideration. The earliest remains of man, including the

flint implements in the higher river gravels, pertain to what Lyell

terms the post-pliocene period. The huge lizards or saurians of the

oolitic period had become extinct countless ages previously. The same

may be said, though in a relatively lesser degree, of the huge

Dinotherium found in the Upper Miocene formation. Some writers, indeed,

who advocate the hypothesis of man's descent by "natural selection" or

"evolution," from the lower animals, contend that some antitype of

humanity _may_ have lived in the Miocene period, but of this we have no

evidence. The extinct gigantic animals, found in connection with the

oldest known remains of man, are pachyderms, which in no way resemble,

either in their habits, or by the most strained metaphor, in their

forms, the dragons and serpents of the Aryan mythology or their modern

descendants in British history and tradition. The discovery of their

bones has undoubtedly had something to do with giants and other monsters

of the mythic class, of which more will be said in another chapter.

FOOTNOTES:

[11] Du Chaillu, in his "Journey to Ashango-land," relates a story in

which he suddenly struck a light with a lucifer match, to the

astonishment of the benighted Africans, who regarded the feat as an

additional proof of his being the "Oguisi" or "spirit" they had declared

him to be.

[12] The _Dundee Advertiser_, Nov. 1869, contained the following

paragraph:--

HALLOWE'EN AT BALMORAL CASTLE.--This time-honoured festival was duly

celebrated at Balmoral Castle on Saturday evening, in a manner not soon

to be forgotten by those who took part in the enjoyments of the evening.

As the shades of evening were closing in upon the Strath, numbers of

torch-lights were observed approaching the Castle, both from the

cottages on the eastern portion of the estate and also those on the

west. The torches from the western side were probably the more numerous,

and as the different groups gathered together the effect was very fine.

Both parties met in front of the Castle, the torch-bearers numbering

nearly one hundred. Along with those bearing the torches were a great

many people belonging to the neighbourhood. Dancing was commenced by the

torch-bearers dancing a "Huachan" in fine style, to the lilting strains

of Mr. Ross, the Queen's piper. The effect was greatly heightened by the

display of bright lights of various colours from the top of the

staircase of the Tower. After dancing for some time, the torch-bearers

proceeded round the Castle in martial order, and as they were proceeding

down the granite staircase at the northwest corner of the Castle, the

procession presented a singularly beautiful and romantic appearance.

Having made the circuit of the Castle, the remainder of the torches were

thrown in a pile at the south-west corner, thus forming a large bonfire,

which was speedily augmented with other combustibles until it formed a

burning mass of huge proportions, round which dancing was spiritedly

carried on. Her Majesty witnessed the proceedings with apparent interest

for some time, and the company enjoyed themselves none the less heartily

on that account. Mr. Begg, distiller, Lochnagar, had also a splendid

bonfire on Cairnbeg, round which merry groups danced torch in hand.

[13] I have not met with a thoroughly satisfactory etymology of the word

bonfire. It may mean good fire, that is sacred fire, or bone-fire, as

the old writer suggests; but I am inclined to think _boon_ fire is worth

consideration, as the ceremonies and sacrifices were performed in order

to extract a boon, a gift, or favour from the god Bel. Free service

rendered by a tenant to his lord, as part of his tenure, was called boon

work. Dr. Hibbert Ware records an old saying in the north of England to

the effect that when a man has been working for nothing he has "been

served like a boon-shearer."

[14] Since the above was written the following paragraph has appeared in

the newspapers:--

_An Apology for Fire Worship._--Tuesday, the 21st March, 1866, being the

entrance of Sol into the zodiacal sign of the Ram, there was held at the

Persian Embassy, Avenue d'Autin, Paris, the festival of Nourous

Sultaniez, or New Year's Day of the Shah. His Excellency Hassan Ali Khan

presided over a large assemblage of distinguished guests, and informed

them in the course of the festivity that they were celebrating a

red-letter day as old as nineteen centuries before the birth of Christ,

first instituted by Djemchid, of the dynasty of Pischdadiens, who

originated the solar computation of years. His excellency proceeded to

recall the fire-worship of his country, which sprang from the primæval

idolatry having for object that great luminary. It was still to fire

that he fondly looked for the regeneration of Persia. Fire had changed

the face of Europe. With the steam engine, the railroad, the electric

spark, the screw or paddle ship, far more than in gunpowder or rifled

cannon, fire was the great benefactor that would bless one day the land

of his forefathers, who had instinctively worshipped that element in

secret anticipation of what was to come. The remarks of his excellency

were cordially received.

[15] Sir Bernard Burke says the legend asserts that the knight consulted

a witch as to the best method of attacking the monster serpent or

dragon, as this worm is sometimes styled. The witch duly instructed him,

and he was victorious in the combat which followed. A condition,

however, was attached, namely that the knight should follow up the

achievement by slaying as a kind of sacrifice the first living thing he

met. If he failed in this, "for nine generations the lords of Lambton

would never die in their beds." It was intended that a dog should be

placed so as to immediately attract the eye of the conqueror, but

unfortunately the plot was accidentally marred, and the knight's father

first confronted him. Lambton refused to fulfil the condition, under

such circumstances. It is stated to be a fact that afterwards nine

successive lords of Lambton died otherwise than in their beds.

[16] Mr. Haigh fixes Heorot, the site of the mead-hall, or banqueting

home of Hrothgar, chief or king of the Scyldings, at Hartlepool. King

Oswy, brother and successor of St. Oswald, consecrated his daughter

Elfleda to the service of God as a nun, as an act of thanksgiving for

his victory over the pagan Mercian King Penda, at Winwidfield, near

Leeds (some say near Winwick, Lancashire.) Elfleda was placed in the

monastery called Herut-ed (Hartlepool), which is believed to be the

Heorot of the oldest Anglo-Saxon poem extant.

[17] Professor Owen (Palæontology, page 312) gives "slow-worms,

serpents," as the English equivalent of _Ophidia_, the name of his

eleventh order of the class _Reptilia_. Hence the confusion of

traditionary worms, serpents, and dragons is not quite so absurd as

modern non-scientific persons generally imagine. The Rev. G. W. Cox,

referring to the Greek aspect of these mythic monsters, says:--"When the

word Dragon, which is only another form of Dorkas, the clear-eyed

gazelle, became the name for serpents, these mythical beings were

necessarily transformed into snakes."

Traditions, Superstitions and Folk-lore (Chiefly Lancashire and the North of England:) Their Affinity to Others in Widely-Distributed Localities; Their Eastern Origin and Mythical Significance. · 第 2 / 15 章