CHAPTER IV

The Morals of the Period

Examples of the precocious talents displayed by Mademoiselle de

l'Enclos are not uncommon in the twentieth century, but the

application she made of them was remarkable and uncommon. Accomplished

in music, learned and proficient in the languages, a philosopher of no

small degree, and of a personal beauty sometimes called "beauté de

diable," she appeared upon the social stage at a time when a new idol

was an imperative necessity for the salvation of moral sanity, and the

preservation of some remnants of personal decency in the sexual

relations.

Cardinal Richelieu had just succeeded in consolidating the usurpations

of the royal prerogatives on the rights of the nobility and the

people, which had been silently advancing during the preceding reigns,

and was followed by the long period of unexampled misgovernment, which

oppressed and impoverished as well as degraded every rank and every

order of men in the French kingdom, ceasing only with the Revolution.

The great Cardinal minister had built worse than he had intended, it

is to be hoped; for his clerico-political system had practically

destroyed French manhood, and left society without a guiding star to

cement the rope of sand he had spun. Unable to subject the master

minds among the nobility to its domination, ecclesiasticism had

succeeded in destroying them by augmenting royal prerogatives which it

could control with less difficulty. Public maxims of government,

connected as they were with private morals, had debauched the nation,

and plunged it into a depth of degradation out of which Richelieu and

his whole entourage of clerical reformers could not extricate a single

individual. It was a riot of theological morality.

The whole body of the French nobility and the middle class of citizens

were reduced to a servile attendance on the court, as the only means

of advancement and reward. Every species of industry and merit in

these classes was sedulously discouraged; and the motive of honorable

competition for honorable things, being withdrawn, no pursuit or

occupation was left them but the frivolous duties, or the degrading

pleasures of the palace.

Next to the king, the women naturally became the first objects of

their effeminate devotion; and it is difficult to say which were

soonest corrupted by courtiers consummate in the arts of adulation,

and unwearied in their exercise. The sovereign rapidly degenerated

into an accomplished despot, and the women into intriguers and

coquettes. Richelieu had indeed succeeded in subjecting the State to

the rule of the Church, but Ninon was destined to play an important

part in modifying the evils which afflicted society, and at least

elevate its tone. From the methods she employed to effect this

change, it may be suspected that the remedy was equivalent to the

Hanemannic maxim: "Similia similbus curantur," a strange application

of a curative agent in a case of moral decrepitude, however valuable

and effective it may be in physical ailments.

The world of the twentieth century, bound up as it is in material

progress, refuses to limit its objects and aims to the problematic

enjoyment of the pleasures of Paradise in the great hereafter, or of

suffering with stoicism the pains and misfortunes of this earth as a

means of avoiding the problematic pains of Hell. Future rewards and

punishments are no longer incentives to virtue or right living. The

only drag upon human acts of every kind is now that great political

maxim, the non-observance of which has often deluged the earth with

blood; "Sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas," which is to say: So use

thine own as not to injure thy neighbor. It is a conventional

principle, one of contract in reality, but it has become a great

doctrine of equity and justice, and it is inculcated by our

educational systems to the exclusion of the purely religious idea, and

the elimination of religious dogma, which tends to oppressive

restraints, is carefully fostered.

There is another reason why men's minds are impelled away from the

purely sentimental moral doctrines insisted upon by sectarianism,

which is ecclesiasticism run riot, and the higher the education the

deeper we delve into the secret motives of that class of mankind, the

deceptive outward appearances of which dominate the pages of history,

which is, that the greatest and most glorious systems of government,

the wisest and most powerful of rulers, the greatest and most liberal

statesmen, heroes, and conspicuous conquerors, originated in

violations of the Decalogue, and those nations and kingdoms which have

been founded upon strictly ecclesiastical ideas, have all sunk beneath

the shifting sands of time, or have become so degenerate as to be

bywords and objects of derision.

From the same viewpoint, a strange phenomenon is observable in the

world of literature, arts, and sciences. The brightest, greatest

geniuses, whose works are pointed to with admiration; studied as

models and standards, made the basis of youthful education, imitated,

and even wept over by the sentimental, were, in their private lives,

persons of the most depraved morals. Why this should be the case, it

is impossible even to conjecture, the fact only remaining that it is

so. Perhaps there are so many different standards of morality, that

humanity, weary of the eternal bickering consequent upon the conflicts

entered into for their enforcement, have made for themselves a new

interpretation which they find less difficult to observe, and find

more peace and pleasure in following.

To take a further step in the same direction, it is curious that in

the lives of the Saints, those who spent their whole earthly existence

in abstinence, works of the severest penance, and mortifications of

the flesh, the tendency of demoniac influence was never in the

direction of Sabbath breaking, profanity, idolatry, robbery, murder

and covetousness, but always exerted itself to the fullest extent of

its power in attacks upon chastity. All other visions were absent in

the hair-shirted, and self-scourgings brought out nothing but sexual

idealities, sensual temptations. The reason for this peculiarity is

not far to seek. What is dominant in the minds always finds egress

when a favorable opportunity is presented, and the very thought of

unchastity as something to be avoided, leads to its contemplation, or

its creation in the form of temptation. The virtue of chastity was the

one law, and its observances and violations were studied from every

point of view, and its numberless permissible and forbidden

limitations expatiated upon to such a degree, that he who escaped them

altogether could well attribute the result to the interposition of

some supernatural power, the protection of some celestial guardian.

One is reminded of the expression of St. Paul: "I had not known lust

had the law not said: thou shalt not covet." Lord Beaconsfield's

opinion was, that excessive piety led to sexual disorders.

According to Ninon's philosophy, whatever tended to propagate

immoderation in the sexual relations was rigidly eliminated, and

chastity placed upon the same plane and in the same grade as other

moral precepts, to be wisely controlled, regulated, and managed. She

put all her morality upon the same plane, and thereby succeeded in

equalizing corporeal pleasure, so that the entire scale of human acts

produced a harmonious equality of temperament, whence goodness and

virtue necessarily followed, the pathway being unobstructed.

It is too much to be expected, or even to be hoped for, that there

will ever be any unanimity among moral reformers, or any uniformity in

their standards of moral excellence. The educated world of the present

day, reading between the lines of ancient history, and some that is

not so very ancient, see ambition for place and power as the moving

cause, the inspiration behind the great majority of revolutions, and

they have come to apply the same construction to the great majority of

moral agitations and movements for the reform of morals and the

betterment of humanity, with pecuniary reward or profit, however,

added as the sine qua non of maintaining them.

Cure the agitation by removing the occasion for it, and Othello's

occupation would be gone; hence, the agitation continues. As an

eminent theologian declared with a conviction that went home to a

multitude, at the Congress of Religions, when the Columbian Exposition

was in operation:

"If all the religions in the world are to be merged into one, who, or

what will support the clergy that will be deprived of their salaries

by the change in management?"

The Golden Calf and Aaron were there, but where was the angry Moses?

Life, letters, and Epicurean philosophy of Ninon de L'Enclos, the celebrated beauty of the seventeenth century · 第 4 / 18 章