IRRESPONSIBILITY

The spectacle of a $100,000,000 “trust” unable to get hay

for its horses on credit was seen recently in Sault Ste.

Marie, where the Consolidated Lake Superior Company went into

liquidation. The liquidation resulted from the failure of the

directors of this big concern to raise $5,000,000 to pay a loan

from the Speyer syndicate.

Here is a corporation which was paying seven per cent dividends,

and which began two or three years ago with a capital of

$102,000,000, so destitute of liquid assets or working capital

that it can not pay a loan of $5,000,000, for which its very

existence was pawned. Nothing appears to be left.

Lake Superior Consolidated, like all the other trusts, was

organized under the Connecticut corporation act, which, like

that of West Virginia, New Jersey, Delaware, and other States,

was expressly drawn to relieve all concerned of responsibility.

No one was responsible for anything in the prospectus. No

one could be held, in the promotion or direction, for any

statements, promises, or representations. The sidewalk vender is

more responsible for the razors and remedies that he sells in

the flare of his gasoline lamp than the promoters or directors

of an American trust to which millions of dollars flow.--New

York _American_.

(1680)

Cyclopedia of illustrations for public speakers · 第 1482 / 3174 题