BOOKS, THE SIZE OF

We are capable of believing, not only that we love books which

we do not love, but that we have read books which we have

not read. A lifelong intimacy with their titles, a partial

acquaintance with modern criticism, a lively recollection of

many familiar quotations--these things come in time to be

mistaken for a knowledge of the books themselves. Perhaps in

youth it was our ambitious purpose to storm certain bulwarks of

literature; but we were deterred by their unpardonable length.

It is a melancholy truth, which may as well be acknowledged

at the start, that many of the books best worth reading are

very, very long, and that they can not, without mortal hurt,

be shortened. Nothing less than a shipwreck on a desert island

in company with Froissart’s “Chronicles” would give us leisure

to peruse this glorious narrative, and it is useless to hope

for such a happy combination of chances. We might, indeed, be

wrecked--that is always a possibility--but the volume saved

dripping from the deep would be “Soldiers of Fortune,” or

“Mrs. Wiggs of the Cabbage Patch.”--AGNES REPPLIER,

“Compromises.”

(274)

Cyclopedia of illustrations for public speakers · 第 246 / 3174 题