Who are they? No one exactly knows. They are Miss A. and Miss B., and

they have collaterals of respectable name and standing; cousins in

Government offices; dead uncles of good military rank; perhaps a

father, dead or alive, with a quite unexceptionable position; but you

never see them with their natural belongings, and no one thinks of

visiting them at their own homes. They are sure to have a mother in

bad health, who never goes out and never sees any one; and if you

should by chance come across her, you find a shabby, painful, peevish

woman who seems at odds with life altogether, and who is as unlike her

showy daughter as a russet wren is unlike a humming-bird. The

drawing-room epiphyte introduces mamma, when necessary, with a

creditable effort at indifference, not to say content, with her

conditions; but if you can read signs, you know what she is feeling

about that suit of rusty black, and how little she enjoys the

rencounter.

Sometimes she has a brother, of whom she never speaks unless obliged,

and of whose occupation and whereabouts, when asked, she gives only

the vaguest account. He has an office in the City; or he has gone

abroad; or he is in the navy and she forgets the name of his ship;

but, whatever he is, you can get no clue more distinct than this. If

you should chance to see him, you get a greater surprise than you had

when you met the mother; and you wonder, with a deeper wonder, how

such a sister should have sprung from the same stock as that which

produced such a brother. Sometimes however, the brother is as

presentable as the sister; in which case he probably follows much the

same course as herself, and hangs on to the skirts of those of the

Upper Ten who recognize him--preferring to idle away his life and

energy as a well-dressed epiphyte of greatness rather than live the

life of a man in a lower social sphere. But, as a rule, stray damsels

have neither brothers nor sisters visible to the world, and only a

widowed mother in the background, whose health is bad and who does not

go out.

The ulterior object of the ladies who patronize these pretty epiphytes

is to get them married; partly from personal kindness, partly from the

pleasure all women have in bringing about a marriage that does not

interfere with themselves. But they seldom accomplish this object. Who

is to marry the epiphyte? The men of the society into which she has

been brought from the outside have their own ambitions to realize.

They want money, or land, or a good family connexion, to make the

sacrifice an equal bargain and to gild the yoke of matrimony with

becoming splendour. And the drawing room epiphyte has nothing to offer

as her contribution but a fine pair of eyes, a good-natured manner,

and a pretty taste for music. To marry well among the society in which

she finds herself is therefore almost impossible. And her tastes have

been so far formed as to render a marriage into lower circumstances

almost as impossible on the other side.

Besides, what could she do as the wife of a clergyman, say on three

hundred a year, with a poor parish to look after and an increasing

tribe of babies to feed and clothe? Her clear high notes, her splendid

register, her brilliant touch, will not help her then; and the taste

with which she makes up half-worn silk gowns, and transforms what was

a rag into an ornament, will not do much towards finding the necessary

boots and loaves which keep her sisters awake at night wondering how

they are to be got. She has been taught nothing of the art of home

life, if she has learnt much of that of the drawing-room. She cannot

cook, nor make a little go a long way by the cunning of good

management and a well-masked economy; she cannot do serviceable

needlework, though she may be great in fancy work, and quite a genius

in millinery; and the habit of having plenty of servants about her has

destroyed the habit of turning her hand to anything like energetic

self-help. Epiphyte as she is, penniless stray damsel more than half

maintained by the kindness of her grand friends, she has to keep up

the sham of appearances before those friends' domestics. And as

ladyhood in England is chiefly measured by a woman's uselessness, and

to do anything in the way of rational work would be a spot on her

ermine, the poor epiphyte of the drawing-room, with mamma in rusty

black in those shabby lodgings of theirs, learns in self-defence to

practise all the foolish helplessness of her superiors; and, to retain

the respect of the servants, loses her own.

What is she then but one of those misplaced beings who are neither of

one sphere nor of another? She is not of the _grandes dames_ on her

own account, yet she lives in their houses as one among them. She is

not a woman who can make the best of things; who, notable and

industrious, and by her clever contrivances of saving and substitution

is able to order a home comfortably on next to nothing; and yet she

has no solid claim to anything but the undercut of the middle classes,

and no right to expect more than the most ordinary marriage. She is

nothing. Ashamed and unable to work, she has to accept gratuities

which are not wages. Waiting on Providence and floated by her friends,

she wanders though society ever on the look-out for chances. Each new

acquaintance is a fresh hope, and every house that opens to her

contains the potentiality of final success. To be met everywhere is

the ultimate point of her ambition with respect to means; the end kept

steadily, if fruitlessly, in view, is that satisfying settlement which

shall take her out of the category of a hanger-on and give her a

_locus standi_ of her own. But it does not come.

Year by year we meet the drawing-room epiphyte in the old haunts--at

Brighton; at Ryde; at half-a-dozen good houses in London; on a visit

to the friends who make much of her one day and snub her the next--but

she does not 'go off.' She is pretty, she is agreeable, she is well

dressed, she is accomplished; but she does not find the husband for

whom all this is offered as the equivalent. Year by year she grows

fatter or thinner as her constitution expands into obesity or shrivels

into leanness; the lines about her fine eyes deepen; the powder is a

little thicker on her cheeks; and there are more than shrewd

suspicions of a touch of rouge or of antimony, with a judicious

application of patent hair-restorer to lift up the faded tints.

Fighting desperately with that old enemy Time, she disputes line by

line the tribute he claims; and succeeds so far as to continue a good

make-up for a year or two after other women of her own age have given

in and consented to look their years. But the drawing-room epiphyte is

nothing if she is not young--which is synonymous with power to

interest and amuse. Her friends, the great ladies who hold

drawing-rooms and gather society in shoals, want points of colour in

their rooms as well as serviceable foils. The apple-pie that was all

made of quinces was a failure, wanting the homely _couche_ from which

the savour of the more fragrant fruit might be thrown up. On the other

hand there are social meetings which are like apple-pies without any

quince at all; and then the epiphyte is invaluable, and her music

worth as much in its degree as if she were a prima donna, each of

whose notes ranked as gold. So that when she ceases to be young, when

she loses her high notes and has gout in her fingers, she fails in her

only _raison d'être_, and her occupation is gone. Hence her hard

struggles with the old enemy, and her half-heroic, half-tragic

determination not to give in while a shred of force remains.

On the day when she collapses into an old woman she is lost. She has

nothing for it then but to withdraw from the brilliant drawing-rooms

she has so long haunted into dingy lodgings in a back street, and live

as her mother lived before her. Forgotten by the world which she has

spent her life in waiting on, she has leisure to reflect on the

relative values of things, and to lament, as she probably will, that

she gave living grain for gilded husks; that she exchanged the

realities of love and home, which might have been hers had she been

contented to accept them on a lower social scale, for the barren

pleasures of the day and the delusive hope of marrying well in a

sphere where she had no solid foothold. She had her choice, like

others; but she chose to throw for high stakes at heavy odds, and in

so doing let slip what she originally held. The bird in the hand might

have been of a homely kind enough; still, it was always the bird;

while the two golden pheasants in the bush flew away unsalted, and

left her only their shadows to run after.

On the whole then, we incline to the belief that the drawing-room

epiphyte is a mistake, and that those stray damsels who wander about

society unattended by any natural protector and always more or less in

the character of adventuresses, would do better to keep to the sphere

determined by parental circumstances than to let themselves be taken

into one which does not belong to them and which they cannot hold.

And furthermore it seems to us that, irrespective of its present

instability and future fruitlessness, the position of a drawing-room

epiphyte is one which no woman of sense would accept, and to which no

woman of spirit would submit.

_THE EPICENE SEX._

There has always been in the world a kind of women whom one scarcely

knows how to classify as to sex; men by their instincts, women by

their form, but neither men nor women as we regard either in the

ideal. In early times they were divided into two classes; the Amazons

who, donning helmet and cuirass, went to the wars that they might be

with their lovers, or perhaps only for an innate liking for rough

work; and the tribe of ancient women, so withered and so wild, who

should be women yet whose beards forbade men so to account them, and

for whom public opinion usually closed the controversy by declaring

that they were witches--that is, creatures so unlike the rightful

woman of nature that only the devil himself was supposed to be

answerable for them. These particular manifestations have long since

passed away, and we have nowadays neither Amazons learning the

goose-step in our barrack-yards, nor witches brewing hell-broth on

Scottish moors; but we have the Epicene Sex all the same--women who

would defy the acutest social Cuvier among us to classify, but who

are growing daily into more importance and making continually fresh

strides in their unwholesome way.

Possessed by a restless discontent with their appointed work, and

fired with a mad desire to dabble in all things unseemly, which they

call ambition; blasphemous to the sweetest virtues of their sex, which

until now have been accounted both their own pride and the safeguard

of society; holding it no honour to be reticent, unselfish, patient,

obedient, but swaggering to the front, ready to try conclusions in

aggression, in selfishness, in insolent disregard of duty, in cynical

abasement of modesty, with the hardest and least estimable of the men

they emulate;--these women of the doubtful gender have managed to drop

all their own special graces while unable to gather up any of the more

valuable virtues of men. They are no more philosophical than the most

inconsequent sister who judges all things according to her feelings,

and commends or condemns principles as she happens to like or dislike

the persons advocating them; and they are as hysterical and

intemperate in their political cries as if the whole world wagged by

impulse only. They are no more magnanimous under rebuke than the

stanchest advocate of the sacredness of sex, but resent all hostile

criticism as passionately, and from grounds as merely personal, as if

they were still shrouded from public blame by the safety of their

privacy; and they are as little useful in their blatant energy as when

they spent their days in working monstrous patterns in crude-coloured

wools, or found spiritual satisfaction in cutting holes in strips of

calico to sew up again with a new stitch. They have committed the

mistake of abandoning such work as they can do well, while trying to

manipulate things which they touch only to spoil; they have ceased to

be women and not learnt to be men; they have thrown aside beauty and

not put on strength.

The latest development of the impulses which animate the epicene sex

has taken its expression in after-dinner oratory. If we were as

malicious to women as those whose follies we rebuke would have the

world believe, we should encourage them to fight it out with womanly

modesty and the world's esteem on this line. Their worst enemies could

not wish to see them inflict on themselves a greater annoyance than

the obligation of getting on their legs after the cheese has been

removed, to turn on a stream of verbal insipidity for a quarter of an

hour at a stretch. Only men who have something to say on the subject

that may be on hand, and so are glad of every opportunity for

elucidation or advocacy, or men who are eaten up with vanity, take

pleasure in speechifying after dinner. Its uselessness is apparent;

its mock hilarity is ghastly; even at political 'banquets,' when words

are supposed to have some deep meaning, we get very little substance

in it; while all the funny part of the business is the dreariest

comedy, the unreality of which brings it close to tragedy.

If anything were wanting to show how much vanity prompts a certain

class of women in their ways and works, and how tremendous is their

passion for notoriety and personal display, it would be this

assumption of the functions of the post-prandial orator. Indeed they

have taken greatly of late to public speaking all round; and some

among them seem only easy when they are standing before a crowd, to be

admired if they are pretty, applauded if they are pert, and, in any

case, the centre of attraction for the moment. We do not look forward

with pleasure to the time when ladies will rise after their champagne

and port, with flushed cheeks and eyes more bright than beautiful,

steadying themselves adroitly against the back of their chairs, and

rolling out either those interminable periods with no nominatives and

no climax under which we have all so often suffered, or spasmodically

jerking forth a few unconnected sentences of which the sole merit is

their brevity. In the beginning of things, when the wedge has to be

introduced, only the best of its kind puts itself forward; and

doubtless the ladies who have already varied the usual dull routine of

after-dinner oratory by their livelier utterances have done the thing

comparatively well, and avoided a breakdown; but we own that we

tremble at the thought of the flood of feminine eloquence which will

be let loose if the fashion spreads.

Fancy the heavy British matron rearing her ample shoulders above the

board, as she lays down the law on the duties of men towards

women--especially sons-in-law--and the advantage to all concerned if

wives are liberally dealt with in the matter of housekeeping money,

and let to go their own way without marital hindrance. Or think of the

woman's-rights woman, with her hybrid costume and her hard face,

showing society how it can be saved from destruction only by throwing

the balance of power into the hands of women--by the nobler and

brighter instincts of the oppressed sex swamping that rude, rough,

masculine element which has so long mismanaged matters. Or even think

of the coquettish and alluring little woman getting up before a crowd

of men and firing off the neatest and smartest park of verbal

artillery possible, every shot of which tells and is applauded to the

echo. How will men take it all? For ourselves, having too sincere a

respect for women as they ought to be, and as nature meant them to be,

we do not wish to see them turned into social buffoons, the mark for

jeering comments and angry hisses when what they say displeases their

hearers, told to 'sit down,' and 'shut up,' with entreaties to some

strong man to 'take them out of that and carry them home to the

nursery,' by a hundred voices roughened with drink and shouting. But

if women expect that hostile feelings and opinions will be tamed or

altogether suppressed in their honour because they choose to thrust

themselves where they have no business, they will find out their

mistake, perhaps when too late. If they abandon their safe cover and

come out into the open, they must look to be hit like the rest. We

cannot too often repeat that if they will mingle in the specialities

of men's lives, they must put up with men's treatment and not cry out

when they are struck home. In deference to them plain-speaking has

been banished from the drawing rooms of society; but it is too much to

expect men to sit in their own places under heavy boredom or fatuous

gabble without wincing; and it is childish to ask us to make a

free-gift of our truth and time to women who outrage one and waste the

other. On the other hand the cheers which would follow if they hit the

humour of the hour, or if, being specially pretty or specially smart,

they afforded so much more than the ordinary excitement to the guests,

would to our minds be just as offensive as the rougher truth, and

perhaps more so. The leering approbation of men never over-nice in

thought and now heated with wine, such as are always to be found at

public dinners, is an infliction from which we should have imagined

any woman with purity or self-respect would have shrunk with shame and

dismay. But women who take to after-dinner speeches cannot be either

nervous or fastidious.

Perhaps it is expecting too much of women of this kind if we ask them

to consider themselves in relation to men's liking. They profess to

despise the masculine animal they are so fond of imitating, and to be

careless of his liking; holding it a matter of supreme indifference

whether they are to his taste or not. But it may be as well to say

plainly that the disgust which we may presume the normal healthy woman

feels for men who paint and pad and wear stays and work Berlin

work--men who give their minds to chignons and costumes; who spy after

their maids' love-letters, and watch their boys as cats watch

mice--men who occupy themselves with domestic details they should know

nothing about; who look after the baby's pap-boat and the cinders in

the dust-heap, and can call the various articles of household linen by

their proper names--the disgust which the womanly woman feels for them

is exactly that which the manly man feels for the epicene sex.

Hard, unblushing, unloving women whose ideal of happiness lies in

swagger and notoriety; who hate home life and despise home virtues;

who have no tender regard for men and no instinctive love for

children; who despise the modesty of sex as they deny its natural

fitness--these women have worse than no charm for men, and their place

in the human family seems altogether a mistake. If there were any

special work which they could do better than manly men or feminine

women, we could understand their economic uses, and accept them as

eminently unlovely outgrowths of a natural law, but at least as

necessary and natural. But they are not wanted. They simply disgust

men and mislead women; and those women whom they do not mislead in

their own they often influence too strongly in the other direction by

way of reaction, rendering them sickly in their sweetness, and weak

rather than womanly. If the interlacing margins of certain things are

lovely, as colours which blend together are more harmonious than those

which are crudely distinct, it is not so with the interlacing margin

of sex. Let men be men, and women women, sharply, unmistakably

defined; but to have an ambiguous sex which is neither the one nor the

other, possessing the coarser passions and instincts of men without

their strength or better judgment, and the position and privileges of

women without their tenderness, their sense of duty, or their modesty,

is a state of things that we should like to see abolished by public

opinion, which alone can touch it.

_WOMEN'S MEN._

If songs are the expressions of a nation's political temper, novels

show the current of its social morality, and what the learned would

call its psychological condition. When French novelists devote half

their stories to the analysis of those feelings which end in breaking

the seventh commandment, and the other half to the gradual evolution

of the evidence which leads to the detection of a secret murderer, we

may safely assume, on the one hand, that the marriage law presses

heavily, and, on the other, that the national intellect is of that

ingenious kind which takes pleasure in puzzles, and is best

represented by the familiar examples of dovetailing and mosaic work.

When too, we see that their common feminine type is a creature given

over as a prey to nervous fancies and an exalted imagination, of a

feverish temperament and a general obscuration of plain morality in

favour of a subtilizing and misleading kind of thing which she calls

her _besoin d'âme_, we may be sure that this is the type most approved

by both writer and readers, and that anything else would be

unwelcome.

The French novelist who should describe, as his central figure, a

self-disciplined, straightforward, healthy young woman, honestly in

love with her husband, rationally fond of her children, not given to

dangerous musings about the need of her soul for an elective affinity

outside her marriage bond, nor spending her hours in speculating on

the philosophy of necessity as represented by Léon or Alphonse; who

should make her absolutely impervious to the sickly sentimentalism of

the inevitable _célibat_, and neither palter with peril nor lament

that sin should be sinful when it is so pleasant; who should paint

domestic morality as we know it exists in France no less than in

England, and trust for his interest to the quiet pathos of unfriendly

but cleanly circumstances, would be hard put to it to make his heroine

attractive and his story popular; and his readers would not be counted

by tens of thousands, as were those who gloated over the sins of

_Madame Bovary_ and the prurience of _Fanny_. The Scandinavian type of

woman again, strong-armed, independent, athletic, practical, would not

go down with the French reading public; wherefore we may assume that

the _Parisienne_, as we know her in romance--feverish, subtil,

casuistic, self-deluding, and always ready to sacrifice duty to

sentiment--is the woman best liked by the people to whom she is

offered, and that the novelist but repeats and represents the wish of

his readers.

So, too, when our own novelists carry their stock puppets through the

nine hundred pages held to be necessary for the due display of their

follies and disasters, we may be sure that they are of the kind which

finds favour in the eyes of the ordinary English reader; that the

girls are the girls who please young men or do not alarm mothers, and

that the men are the men in whom women delight, and think the ideals

of their sex. If, as it is said, the delineation of her hero is the

touchstone of a woman's literary power, it must be confessed that the

touchstone discloses, for the most part, a very feeble amount of

literary power, and that the female mind has but a small perception of

all that relates to man's needs and nature.

The Girl of the Period, and Other Social Essays, Vol. 2 (of 2) · 第 13 / 19 段