PLATE VI.--A NOBLE LADY OF VENICE

(At Lord Armstrong's seat, Rothbury Castle, Northumberland)

As a technical exercise, searching, precise, and careful, and yet

distinguished by a sumptuous breadth of effect, this memorable study of

a fine type of feminine beauty takes high rank among the artist's

smaller paintings. It bears most plainly the stamp of his correct and

cultivated taste.

[Illustration: PLATE VI.--A NOBLE LADY OF VENICE]

======================================================================

Into this decade fall two of the greater events of his life, his

election as President of the Royal Academy, and the execution of his

famous wall paintings, "The Arts of War," and "The Arts of Peace," in

the South Kensington Museum. On the death of Sir Francis Grant, who

had held the Presidential office since 1866, Leighton was chosen, on

November 13, 1878, to fill the vacant post. In making this selection,

the members of the Academy did honour to a man who had raised himself,

by sheer strength of personality, to a position of acknowledged

leadership in the art affairs of this country, but they also secured as

their President an artist who was almost ideally fitted to deal with

the many responsibilities which have necessarily to be incurred by the

head of such an institution. Leighton's commanding and yet attractive

presence, his great power of organisation and grasp of details, his

wide knowledge of the world, and his unusual capacity as a linguist,

gave him not only a high degree of authority as an official, but also

ensured to him the sincere confidence of those associated with him. To

every one outside the Academy he was the personification of all that

was best in academic art; and by his breadth of mind, his wise

toleration of all types of earnest effort, and his ready sympathy with

the struggling worker to whom merit had not brought success, he gained

the respect and even affection of the great mass of the profession. No

President since Reynolds has been so worthy to direct the policy of the

Academy, and it may fairly be said that none, Reynolds not excepted,

has ruled over it with more discretion, or with better appreciation of

the possibilities of the position.

The other event, the carrying out of the South Kensington wall

paintings, is specially notable because in these works Sir Frederic

Leighton--he received the honour of knighthood on his election as

President--was able to put to legitimate uses all his capacities as a

decorator, and to prove that in paintings on the largest scale he was

as much a master of his craft as in the easel pictures to which, for

want of greater opportunities, he was obliged to confine himself. He

had made a previous experiment in this direction in 1866, when he

executed the fresco of "The Wise and Foolish Virgins" in the church at

Lyndhurst, an admirable composition treated with rare intelligence and

distinctive originality; but the South Kensington lunettes were more

exacting undertakings, and calculated to test his powers to the utmost.

"The Arts of War" was begun towards the end of the 'seventies and took

several months to finish, the companion lunette was painted two or

three years later; and both of them, though some of the preliminary

work was done by assistants, are substantially from his hand.

In many respects "The Arts of War" is the more satisfying performance.

A scene from mediaeval Italian life, it is handled with something of his

earlier manner, but with an amount of breadth and freshness which he

scarcely approached in his younger days. It has infinite grace without

a hint of weakness, firmness without formality, and style without

conventionality; and it is, above all, a true decoration erring neither

in the direction of excessive pictorial effect, nor in that of dull

unreality. "The Arts of Peace" is less masculine and more studied, and

is neither so ingenious in design, nor so happy in its grouping; though

in parts it shows quite his finest art, and there are in it individual

figures which are delightful examples of his masterly skill as a

draughtsman. It suffers, perhaps, most of all from the want of freedom

of brush-work, and from the substitution of an over-careful precision

of touch for the looser and larger handling which is one of the sources

of the charm of "The Arts of War." Two other decorative achievements

must be added to the record of Sir Frederic's effort in this direction,

the ceiling for the music-room of Mr. Marquand's house in New York,

painted in 1886, and the admirable panel, "Phoenicians Bartering with

Britons," executed nine years later for the Royal Exchange.

It is greatly a matter for regret that it should be possible to include

in such a meagre list practically the whole of the artist's work as a

serious decoration. It is true that he was concerned in one of the

many schemes which have been devised for the decoration of St. Paul's

Cathedral, but this scheme was never advanced beyond the preliminary

stage, and his part in it is represented only by the cartoon symbolical

of the Resurrection--"And the Sea gave up the Dead which were in

it"--which now hangs in the Tate Gallery. The chances which he desired

were denied to him, as they were to G. F. Watts, and to other painters

of like ambitions, and the world has in consequence lost much which

would have been of supreme interest. That he, with his often renewed

memories of the frescoes of the Italian masters, must have felt

resentment at the British indifference to this noble form of art can

well be imagined. He knew that, with his aspirations, and his power,

triumphs as great as any of the old painters achieved were well within

his reach, but with all his earnest advocacy, even he was unable to

induce the stolid patron of art to believe that an artist should be

encouraged to produce anything but canvases of a convenient size, which

would serve for the furnishing of modern houses.

So it comes to this, that his only commission for mural decoration on a

large scale was for the two lunettes at South Kensington; the Lyndhurst

fresco was a gift he made to the church, as a thank-offering, it is

said, for his recovery from an illness, and the Marquand ceiling, the

Resurrection cartoon, and the Royal Exchange panel were only paintings

on canvas. It is a poor record, indeed, and one of which the people in

this country have every reason to feel ashamed. But the thwarting of

his ambitions in one direction did not make him in others a less

conscientious artist. "The Arts of Peace" was finished during 1885,

and for another ten years he went on painting pictures into which he

put all his love of ideal beauty, and all his striving for greater

perfection of technical expression. There is certainly no diminution

of power to be perceived in any of these later works, though for some

while before his death he suffered increasingly from the heart trouble

to which at last he succumbed on January 25, 1896.

======================================================================

Leighton · 第 15 / 18 题