One would assume that pregnant and lactating females require more water

than non-pregnant females. One might also assume that juveniles require

different amounts of water and food than adults. Juveniles have less

dense pelage than adults, and probably are affected more by their

immediate environment because of their relatively poor insulation.

Juveniles might also be in an unfavorable situation insofar as water

conservation is concerned, because they are actively growing, and in

most cases, acquiring new pelage; it is well known that these are times

of stress for the individual.

TABLE 10--Weights of Mice at Start and Finish of Experiments,

Showing Changes in Weight and Mean Weights, and Means of Changes

in Weight (mean delta).

========================================================================

_Peromyscus truei truei_

----+---------------------+----------------------+----------------------

| Lab Chow | Hog Chow | Corn

+------+------+-------+-------+------+-------+-------+------+-------

No. |Start | End |[Delta]| Start | End |[Delta]| Start | End |[Delta]

----+------+------+-------+-------+------+-------+-------+------+-------

1 | 31.0 | 31.3 | 0.3 | 31.3 | 32.3 | 1.0 | 32.3 | 29.0 | 3.3

5 | 31.1 | 30.5 | 0.6 | 30.5 | 32.8 | 2.3 | 32.8 | 28.7 | 4.1

6 | 27.6 | 27.1 | 0.5 | 27.1 | 29.5 | 2.4 | 29.5 | 27.3 | 2.2

7 | 28.0 | 26.3 | 1.7 | 26.3 | 27.5 | 1.2 | 27.5 | 22.2 | 5.3

13 | 25.8 | 30.6 | 4.8 | 30.6 | 27.0 | 3.6 | 27.0 | 22.2 | 4.8

14 | 26.9 | 30.7 | 3.8 | 30.7 | 31.4 | 0.7 | 31.4 | 27.3 | 4.1

15 | 25.4 | 29.4 | 4.0 | 29.4 | 29.8 | 0.4 | 29.8 | 24.0 | 5.8

16 | 33.0 | 32.9 | 0.1 | 32.9 | 30.5 | 2.4 | 30.5 | 26.0 | 4.5

19 | 37.6 | 38.1 | 0.5 | 38.1 | 31.8 | 6.3 | 31.8 | 22.0 | 9.8

20 | 23.5 | 25.8 | 2.3 | 25.8 | 26.2 | 0.4 | 26.2 | 22.9 | 3.1

----+------+------+-------+-------+------+-------+-------+------+-------

[=Y]| 28.9 | 30.2 | 1.8 | 30.2 | 29.8 | 2.0 | 29.8 | 25.2 | 4.7

----+------+------+-------+-------+------+-------+-------+------+-------

_Peromyscus maniculatus rufinus_

----+---------------------+----------------------+----------------------

| Lab Chow | Hog Chow | Corn

+------+------+-------+-------+------+-------+-------+------+-------

No. |Start | End |[Delta]| Start | End |[Delta]| Start | End |[Delta]

----+------+------+-------+-------+------+-------+-------+------+-------

2 | 23.0 | 20.7 | 2.3 | 20.7 | 21.1 | 0.4 | 21.1 | 18.6 | 2.5

3 | 22.7 | 23.1 | 0.4 | 23.1 | 23.8 | 0.7 | 23.8 | 20.7 | 3.1

4 | 22.0 | 21.1 | 0.9 | 21.1 | 21.8 | 0.7 | 21.8 | 21.3 | 0.5

8 | 26.3 | 28.1 | 1.8 | 28.1 | 15.8 | 2.3 | 25.8 | 23.8 | 2.0

9 | 21.5 | 24.0 | 2.5 | 24.0 | 25.1 | 1.1 | 25.1 | 21.8 | 3.3

10 | | | | | | | 22.5 | 20.0 | 2.5

11 | 21.0 | 22.1 | 1.1 | 22.1 | 20.8 | 1.3 | 20.8 | 19.0 | 1.8

12 | 22.3 | 23.2 | 0.9 | 23.2 | 21.3 | 1.9 | 21.3 | 20.4 | 0.9

17 | 18.9 | 20.0 | 1.1 | 20.0 | 19.2 | 0.8 | 19.2 | 19.4 | 0.2

18 | 17.0 | 17.5 | 0.5 | 17.5 | 19.5 | 2.0 | 19.5 | 17.3 | 2.2

21 | 18.9 | 18.1 | 0.8 | 18.1 | 20.2 | 2.1 | 20.2 | 17.3 | 2.9

----+------+------+-------+-------+------+-------+-------+------+-------

[=Y]| 21.4 | 21.8 | 1.2 | 21.8 | 21.8 | 1.3 | 21.9 | 19.9 | 2.2

----+------+------+-------+-------+------+-------+-------+------+-------

Lindeborg (1950:76) found that 15 days before parturition, pregnant and

non-pregnant females of _P. m. bairdii_ drank about the same amounts of

water, that females consumed more water after the young were born and

until they were weaned, and that water consumption increased with an

increase in weight in young, growing individuals. He found that in the

later stages of pregnancy, females of _P. m. bairdii_ required 36 per

cent more water than non-breeding females; at 14 days after parturition,

nursing females required 111 per cent more water than non-breeding

females, and at weaning time, 158 per cent more water. Dice (1922:35)

reported a 217 per cent increase in drinking of _P. m. bairdii_ before

parturition, and 171 per cent increase while nursing.

Several females of both species were bred prior to the start of the

experiments described herein. As a consequence, it was possible to

determine water and food consumption for lactating females of each

species, and later, for their litters. Pregnant and lactating females,

and newly-weaned litters, were fed laboratory chow throughout this

experiment. The litters were separated from their mothers as soon as the

young were observed to be eating, or no later than 33 days after birth.

Table 11 shows the amounts of water and food consumed by two females of

each species while they were either in the later stages of pregnancy, or

were nursing. Although the data in Table 11 do not cover the full

developmental time of the litters involved, it is obvious that both

lactating females of _P. truei_ and one female of _P. maniculatus_

consumed more water than the average for their species (Table 7). Water

and food consumption was measured for both females of _P. truei_ while

they were nursing. The female that gave birth to litter A was left in

the cage with the male for several days after the litter was born,

resulting in another litter being born about 27 days after the first.

Therefore, the record of this female represents an extreme case of

stress (probably a common occurrence in nature) in which a female is

nursing one litter while she is pregnant with a second.

The record of the female of _P. truei_ that gave birth to litter B is

the most complete, including data from the fifth day after parturition

until the young were weaned on the thirty-third day after parturition.

The record of the female of _P. maniculatus_ that gave birth to litter C

covers the last 10 days of nursing before the young were weaned. After

being separated from her litter, this female drank more than the average

amounts of water, on both high and low protein diets. Although the food

and water were lost several times for the female of _P. maniculatus_

with litter D, the period of time covered by the 14 days when water and

food consumption were measured includes times just prior to parturition

and to weaning of the young.

TABLE 11--Water and Food Consumed by Nursing Females of _P. truei_

and _P. maniculatus_. Consumption Is Calculated on the Basis of

Amount (Milliliters or Grams) Consumed per Gram of Body Weight

per Day, as well as Total Amounts Used per Day.

Column headings:

A: Water used

B: No. days

C: Average weight

D: ml. H_{2}O/gm./day

E: Total water/day

F: No. in litter

G: Food used

H: gms. food/gm./day

I: Total food/day

=====================+=======+====+=======+======+=======+===

Female | A | B | C | D | E | F

---------------------+-------+----+-------+------+-------+---

_P. truei_ (A) | 447 | 17 | 33.00 | .796 | 26.29 | 3

_P. truei_ (B) | 676 | 28 | 32.70 | .738 | 24.14 | 3

_P. maniculatus_ (C) | 191 | 10 | 19.45 | .983 | 19.10 | 5

_P. maniculatus_ (D) | 133 | 14 | 24.35 | .224 | 5.46 | 6

---------------------+-------+----+-------+------+-------+---

Female | G | B | C | H | I | F

---------------------+-------+----+-------+------+-------+---

_P. truei_ (A) | 214.7 | 26 | 33.00 | .250 | 8.26 | 3

_P. truei_ (B) | 120.5 | 24 | 32.70 | .153 | 5.02 | 3

_P. maniculatus_ (C) | 47.8 | 10 | 19.45 | .246 | 4.78 | 5

_P. maniculatus_ (D) | 180.1 | 21 | 27.42 | .312 | 8.58 | 6

---------------------+-------+----+-------+------+-------+---

It is interesting that the female of _P. maniculatus_ with litter C used

much more than the average amount of water for the species, and even

more per gram of body weight than lactating females of _P. truei_.

Conversely, water consumption of the female with litter D was within one

standard deviation of the mean for all adults of _P. maniculatus_. I

infer that at least some lactating females of _P. maniculatus_ are

better adapted to aridity than are some lactating females of _P. truei_.

Table 11 also shows food consumption of the four females discussed

above. All females, with the exception of the female with litter D,

consumed amounts of food that lie within one standard deviation of the

means for their species. The female with litter D had the most young,

consumed the most food but drank the least water of the four females.

Later, when separated from her litter and placed on the low protein

diet, this female drank only .046 milliliters of water per gram of body

weight per day. This figure is less than one-third of the average amount

(.174) for this species (Table 7).

The records of water and food consumption for litters A, C, and D are

given in Table 12; the mice in litter B persisted in placing wood

shavings in the opening of the spout on their water bottle, causing loss

of the water. The data show that mice in all three litters had an

average water and food consumption within one standard deviation of the

mean for adults of their respective species (Tables 7 and 12). It is

interesting that juveniles of both species require no more food and

water per gram of body weight than adults. This indicates that if a

young animal survives the rigors of postnatal life until it is weaned,

it is then at no disadvantage as far as food and water consumption are

concerned. This would be greatly advantageous to the species, as a

population, for the young could disperse immediately upon weaning, and

go into any areas that would be habitable for adults of the species.

TABLE 12--Food and Water Consumed by Young Mice in Litters, After

Weaning. Consumption Is Calculated on the Basis of the Amount

(Milliliters or Grams) Consumed per Gram of Litter Weight per

Day; Total Amounts Are Shown and Can Be Divided by Litter Size

for Average Individual Consumption. Litter Sizes Are as

Follows: A=3; C=5; D=6.

=====================+=======+=========+=====+=========+========+======

| Total | | | Average | ml. | Total

Litter | water | Total | No. | total |H_{2}O/ | water

| used |corrected|days | weight |gm./day | /day

---------------------+-------+---------+-----+---------+--------+------

_P. truei_ (A) | 1207 | 1120 | 57 | 58.30 | .337 | 19.64

_P. maniculatus_ (C) | 1427 | 1340 | 57 | 76.14 | .308 | 23.50

_P. maniculatus_ (D) | 700 | 670 | 31 | 58.80 | .367 | 21.61

---------------------+-------+---------+-----+---------+--------+------

| Total | | Average | Gms./ | Total

Litter | food | No. | total |gms. wt.| food

| used |days | weight | /day | /day

-----------------------------+---------+-----+---------+--------+------

_P. truei_ (A) | 651.2 | 50 | 58.30 | .223 | 13.02

_P. maniculatus_ (C) | 743.8 | 57 | 76.14 | .171 | 13.04

_P. maniculatus_ (D) | 471.1 | 31 | 58.80 | .258 | 15.19

-----------------------------+---------+-----+---------+--------+------

The young of pregnant and lactating females are the animals in the

population most likely to be affected by a deficient supply of water.

Drought could reduce the water content of the vegetation to such a level

that pregnant or lactating females might find it difficult, if not

impossible, to raise litters successfully. If such a drought persisted

throughout an entire breeding season, the next year's population would

be reduced in numbers, for even under normal climatic conditions it is

almost exclusively the juveniles that survive from one breeding season

to the next. If such a hypothetical drought occurred, lactating females

of _P. truei_ would be in a more critical position than lactating

females of _P. maniculatus_.

In order to determine how much water was available to mice in the peak

of the breeding season, samples of the three most common plants in the

study area were collected each week for analysis of their moisture

content. Plants were placed in separate plastic bags that were sealed in

the field. About a dozen plants of each species were used in each

determination. Only the new tender shoots of the plants were collected,

for it was assumed that mice would eat these in preference to the

tougher basal portions of the plants. The plants were taken immediately

to the laboratory and were weighed in the bag. Then the bag was opened

and it and the contents placed in an incubator at 85 degrees Fahrenheit

for a period of at least 72 hours. About 48 hours were required to dry

the plants to a constant weight. The dried plants were weighed and their

percentages of moisture were determined. Plants lose some water upon

being placed in a closed bag; small drops of water appear immediately on

the inner surface of the bag. Therefore, the bag must be weighed at the

same time as the plants and the weight of the dried bag must be

subtracted later.

The three kinds of plants chosen were among the most widely distributed

species in the study area, and all three grow close to the ground,

within reach of mice. Stems and leaves of two of the plants, _Comandra

umbellata_ and _Penstemon linarioides_, were readily eaten by captive

animals. Mice also were observed to eat leaves of _Comandra_ after being

released from metal live traps. The third species, _Solidago

petradoria_, differs from the other two in having a short woody stem

that branches at ground level. The more succulent shoots arise from this

woody stem. The leaves of _Solidago_ are coarse and were not eaten by

captive mice. Nevertheless, this species was chosen because it is widely

distributed and has the growth form of several other species of plants

in the area.

The graph in Figure 20 shows that _Comandra_ contains the highest

percentage of water through most of the summer. Water content of both

_Penstemon_ and _Comandra_ was greatly reduced in the dry period that

occurred in early July. _Solidago_ maintained a relatively constant

percentage of moisture; perhaps its woody stem serves for water storage.

The rains of July and August increased the percentage of moisture in the

plants, but not to the extent expected. Neither _Solidago_ nor

_Comandra_ reached the levels of hydration of early June. All plants

were collected at or about 11 A. M. At night, when mice are active,

these plants would be expected to contain a higher percentage of water

than in the daytime.

The data in Figure 20 indicate that mice probably are not endangered by

water shortages in most years. The average percentage of moisture in the

plants studied was as follows: _Comandra umbellata_ 62.33 per cent;

_Solidago petradoria_ 53.0 per cent; _Penstemon linarioides_ 49.28 per

cent. If a mouse were to eat ten grams of plant material containing 50

per cent moisture, it would provide him with five grams of food and five

grams of water, both of which exceed the minimum daily needs for

non-pregnant adults of either species.

The data indicate that there are sufficient differences in water

consumption between _P. maniculatus_ and _P. truei_ to account for their

habitat preferences in Mesa Verde National Park. In years having average

precipitation, water present in the vegetation has the potential for

providing enough moisture for the needs of both species. Extended

drought would affect individuals of _P. truei_ more adversely than

individuals of _P. maniculatus_.

[Illustration: FIG. 20: Graph showing percentages of moisture

contained during the summer of 1964, by three abundant and

widely-distributed species of plants in Mesa Verde National

Park, Colorado.]

PARASITISM

Ectoparasites were collected by placing specimens of _Peromyscus_ in

separate plastic bags soon after death, adding cotton saturated with

carbon tetrachloride, closing the bag for about five minutes, then

brushing the fur of the specimen above a sheet of white paper. The

ectoparasites were sorted and sent to specialists for identification.

Endoparasites were saved when stomach and intestinal contents were

examined. Larvae of botflies were collected from mice in the autumn of

1962, placed in sand in containers, and kept over winter until they

hatched. Eyelids of alcoholic specimens were inspected for mites by an

authority on these organisms.

In 1961, the incidence of parasitism by botflies was the highest for the

period 1960-1966. _P. maniculatus_ was more heavily infected with

warbles than was _P. truei_. In 84 individuals of _P. maniculatus_ taken

in September 1961, from Morfield Ridge, 32.1 per cent had warbles. The

average number of warbles per animal was 1.24, and it was not uncommon

to find two or three warbles per mouse. Sixty-nine per cent of the

warbles were in the third instar stage, and the rest were in the second

instar stage. Warble infestation was higher in the first half of

September (40 per cent of mice infected) than in the second half of the

month (30 per cent infected), but a larger percentage of the warbles

were found (69 per cent) in the second half of the month.

In October 1961, 12.9 per cent of 62 _P. truei_ were infected with

warbles. The average number of warbles per infected mouse was 1.37.

Seventy-three per cent of the warbles were in the third instar stage;

the rest were in the second instar stage. Warble infestation was higher

in the first half of October (16 per cent of the mice infected) than in

the second half of the month (5.5 per cent infected). These mice were

collected from several localities on Chapin Mesa, in pinyon-juniper

woodland.

In Mesa Verde the greatest incidence of infestations is in late

September and early October. This agrees with the finding of other

investigators (Sealander, 1961:58).

Sealander (1961) investigated hematological values in deer mice infected

with botflies, and found that infected mice had significantly lower

concentrations of hemoglobin than non-infected mice. Myiasis, associated

with infection by _Cuterebra_, is likely to lead to a lowering of the

physiological resistance of a segment of the population, and perhaps to

a subsequent decline in the population (Sealander, 1961:60).

Mice infected by warbles were less agile than non-infected mice. Other

investigators also have reported awkwardness in locomotion in infected

mice (Scott and Snead, 1942:95; Sealander, 1961:58). Test and Test

(1943:507) noted that parasitized mice did not appear to be emaciated,

and this was also true of parasitized mice at Mesa Verde. Healed wounds,

where warbles had emerged, were apparent on a number of mice. The

warbles, and wounds, usually were found on the flanks and backs of the

mice. The large, third instar larvae weighed about one gram apiece;

there is little doubt that such large larvae induce trauma in their

hosts.

The highest rate of infestation by botflies occurred in 1961, the year

in which the population density of _P. maniculatus_ was near its peak.

The population of this species was reduced considerably in 1962, and

remained low through 1964. In 1965, the density of _P. maniculatus_

appeared to be increasing. Other investigators have reported that

increased incidence of _Cuterebra_ infestation in deer mice coincides

with lower population densities and with a downward trend in the

population (Scott and Snead, 1942:95; Wilson, 1945). My data indicate

that this may not be the situation in Mesa Verde.

The intestines or stomachs of almost all individuals of _P. maniculatus_

contained parasites. Endoparasites were less abundant in individuals of

_P. truei_. This heavier infestation of _P. maniculatus_ by tapeworms,

roundworms, and spiny-headed worms probably reflects the larger

proportion of insects eaten by _P. maniculatus_ than by _P. truei_.

The most common endoparasite encountered was the nematode, _Mastophorus

numidica_ Seurat, 1914; it was found in the stomachs of many individuals

of both species of _Peromyscus_. This nematode has been reported from

_Felis ocreata_ in Algeria, _Bitis arietans_ in the Congo, and from the

following mammals in the United States: _Canis latrans_, _Peromyscus

crinitus_, _P. gossypinus_, _P. maniculatus_, _P. truei_, _Onychomys

leucogaster_, _Dipodomys ordii_, _Reithrodontomys megalotis_, and

_Eutamias minimus_.

Individuals of _P. maniculatus_ obtained on the northern end of

Wetherill Mesa in May and June of 1962 had numerous ectoparasites. At

this time, the population of _P. maniculatus_ was high, but on a

downward trend.

My data and observations lead me to conclude that individuals of _P.

maniculatus_ are more heavily parasitized by both botflies and

endoparasites than are individuals of _P. truei_. The reasons for this

unequal amount of parasitism in two species of mice occurring in the

same general area remain obscure.

The kinds of endoparasites and ectoparasites collected from _P.

maniculatus_ and from _P. truei_ are listed below (m = present in _P.

maniculatus_, t = present in _P. truei_).

ACARINA: Ixodidae: _Dermacentor andersoni_ mt, _Ixodes angustus_ mt,

_Ixodes spinipalpis_ m. Laelaptidae: _Androlaelaps glasgowi_ m.

Myobiidae: _Blarinobia_ sp. m. Trombiculidae: _Euschoengastia lanei_ mt,

_Euschoengastia criceticola_ m, _Euschoengastia dicipiens_ t,

_Euschoengastia peromysci_ m, _Leewenhoekia americana_ m, _Trombicula

loomisi_ m.

DIPTERA: Cuterebridae: _Cuterebra cyanella_ mt.

SIPHONAPTERA: _Callistopsyllus deuterus_ m, _Catallagia decipiens_ m,

_Epetedia stanfordi_ mt, _Malaraeus sinomus_ mt, _Malaraeus telchinum_

mt, _Megarthroglossus procus_ mt, _Monopsyllus wagneri wagneri_ mt,

_Orchopeas leucopus_ mt, _Peromyscopsylla hesperomys adelpha_ mt,

_Phalacropsylla allos_ t, _Rhadinopsylla sectilis goodi_ t,

_Stenistomera macrodactyla_ m, _Stenoponia_ (_ponera_ or _americana_)

mt.

CESTODA: _Choanotaenia_ sp. m, _Hymenolepis_ sp. t.

NEMATODA: _Mastophorus numidica_ mt, _Syphacia obvelata_ mt, _Trichuris

stansburyi_ t.

ACANTHOCEPHALA: _Moniliformis clarki_ mt.

PREDATION

In order to determine the relative numbers of each species of

_Peromyscus_ that were taken on a seasonal basis by predators, scats of

coyotes and foxes were collected from trails and roads at least twice

each month, from September 1963 through August 1964. Scats were

identified, labeled and dried; all bones and samples of hair were later

removed from each scat. Scats that were intermediate in size between the

droppings of foxes and coyotes, and that could not be identified readily

in the field, were not collected. Bones from the scats were identified

to species, and hair was identified to genus or species by comparing

color patterns or cuticular patterns with samples from known mammals.

More than 200 impression slides and whole mounts of guard hair and

underfur were prepared.

Seven individuals of _P. truei_ and three individuals of _P.

maniculatus_ were represented in 114 coyote scats (Table 13). Both

species of _Peromyscus_ comprised only 3.9 per cent of the 253 items of

food represented in the 114 scats. Rabbits, _Sylvilagus_ sp. and mule

deer, _Odocoileus hemionus_ were the major food items of coyotes. Mice

of the genus _Peromyscus_ apparently were preyed upon mostly in autumn

(September through November), when mouse populations were near their

yearly peaks.

Foxes also prey upon _Peromyscus_ in the park. One _P. truei_ was

represented in the 16 scats of foxes that were analyzed. This individual

was taken in the winter quarter (December through February).

The bobcat may be an important predator upon _Peromyscus_ in this

region, but few scats of this animal were found. Since these could not

be assigned to a specific month, they were not saved for analysis.

Anderson (1961:58) believed that bobcats and gray foxes were the most

abundant predators in the park. My observations over a period of two

years led me to conclude that coyotes were more abundant than foxes and

that foxes were, in turn, more abundant than bobcats.

TABLE 13--Food Present in 114 Coyote Scats Collected at Mesa Verde

National Park each Month from September 1963 through August 1964.

Comparative Ecology of Pinyon Mice and Deer Mice in Mesa Verde National Park, Colorado · 第 7 / 8 段