CHAPTER VII: SOME ILLUSTRATED BOOKS OF THE PERIOD BEFORE 1860

To draw up a complete list, with the barest details of title, artist,

author, and publisher of the books in the period with which this

volume is concerned would be unnecessary, and well-nigh impossible.

The _English Catalogue_, 1863-1872, covering but a part of the time,

claims to give some 30,000 entries. Many, possibly a large majority,

of these books are not illustrated; but on the other hand, the current

periodicals not included contain thousands of pictures. The following

chapters cannot even claim to mention every book worth the collector's

notice, and refer hardly at all to many which seemed to the compiler

to represent merely the commercial average of their time. Whether this

was better or worse than the commercial average to-day is of no moment.

Nearly all of the books mentioned have been referred to personally, and

the facts reported at first hand. In spite of taxing the inexhaustible

courtesy of the officials of the British Museum to the extent of eighty

or more volumes during a single afternoon, I cannot pretend to have

seen the whole output of the period, for it is not easy to learn from

the catalogue those particulars that are needed to identify which books

are illustrated.

So far as we are concerned here, the interest of the book lies solely

in its illustrations, but the catalogue may not even record the fact

that it contains any, much less attribute them to their author. Of

those in which the artist's share has been recognised by the publisher

in his announcements, I have done my best to find the first edition of

each. By dint of patient wading through the advertisements, and review

columns of literary journals, trade periodicals, and catalogues, a

good many have turned up which had otherwise escaped notice; although

for the last twenty years at least I have never missed an opportunity

of seeing every illustrated book of the sixties, with a view to this

chronicle, which had been shaping itself, if not actually begun, long

before any work on modern English illustrators had appeared. When a

school-boy I made a collection of examples of the work of each artist

whose style I had learned to recognise, and some of that material

gathered together so long ago has been of no little use now. These

personal reminiscences are not put forward by way of magnifying the

result; but rather to show that even with so many years' desultory

preparation the digesting and classification of the various facts has

proved too onerous. A staff of qualified assistants under a capable

director would be needed to accomplish the work as thoroughly as Mr.

Sidney Lee has accomplished a not dissimilar, if infinitely more

important, task--_The Dictionary of National Biography_. A certain

proportion of errors must needs creep in, and the possible errors of

omission are even more to be dreaded than those of commission. A false

date, or an incorrect reference to a given book or illustration, is

easily corrected by a later worker in the same field; but an omission

may possibly escape another student of the subject as it escaped me.

As a rule, in a majority of cases--so large that it is practically

ninety-nine per cent., if not more--the notes have been made side by

side with the publication to which they refer. But in transcribing

hasty jottings errors are apt to creep in, and despite the collation

of these pages when in proof by other hands, I cannot flatter myself

that they are impeccable. For experience shows that you never open the

final printed text of any work under your control as editor or author,

but errors, hitherto overlooked, instantly jump from the page and

force themselves on your notice. An editor of one of the most widely

circulated of all our magazines confesses that he has made it a rule

never to glance at any number after it was published. He had too often

suffered the misery of being confronted with obvious errors of fact and

taste which no amount of patient care on his part (and he is a most

conscientious workman) had discovered, until it was too late to rectify

them. In the matter of dates alone a difficulty meets one at first

sight. Many books dated one year were issued several months before the

previous Christmas, and are consequently advertised and reviewed in

the year before the date which appears upon their title-page. Again,

many books, and some volumes of magazines (Messrs. Cassell and Co.'s

publications to wit), bear no date. 'Women and books should never be

dated' is a proverb as foolish as it is widely known. Yet all the same,

inaccuracy of a few months is of little importance in this context;

a book or a picture does not cease to exist as soon as it is born,

like the performance of an actor or a musician. Consequently, beyond

its relative place as evidence of the development or decline of the

author's talent, it is not of great moment whether a book was issued in

1869 or 1870, whether a drawing was published in January or February.

But for those who wish to refer to the subjects noted, the information

has been made as exact as circumstances permitted. When, however, a

book has been reissued in a second, or later edition, with no reference

to earlier issues, it is tempting to accept the date on its title-page

without question. One such volume I traced back from 1868 to 1849, and

for all I know the original may have been issued some years earlier;

for the British Museum library is not complete; every collector can

point with pride to a few books on his shelves which he has failed to

discover in its voluminous catalogue.

To select a definite moment to start from is not easy, nor to keep

rigidly within the time covered by the dates upon the cover of this

book. It is necessary to glance briefly at some work issued before

1855, and yet it would be superfluous to re-traverse ground already

well covered in _The History of Wood Engraving_, by Chatto and Jackson,

with its supplementary chapter by H. G. Bohn (in the 1861 edition),

in Mr. W. J. Linton's _Masterpieces of Engraving_, in Mr. Joseph

Pennell's two sumptuous editions of _Pen Drawing and Pen Draughtsmen_

(Macmillan), and the same author's _Modern Illustrations_ (Bell), not

to mention the many admirable papers read before learned societies

by Messrs. W. J. Linton, Comyns Carr, Henry Blackburn, Walter Crane,

William Morris, and others. Still less is it necessary to attempt to

indorse their arguments in favour of wood-engraving against process,

or to repeat those which support the opposite view. So that here, in

the majority of cases, the question of the engraver's share has not

been considered. Mr. Pennell, for one, has done this most thoroughly,

and has put the case for process so strongly, that if any people yet

believe a wood-engraving is always something sacred, while a good

process block of line work is a mere feeble substitute, there is

little hope of convincing them. Here the result has been the chief

concern. The object of these notes is not to prove what wood-engraving

ruined, or what might or ought to have been, but merely to record

what it achieved, without too frequent expression of regret, which

nevertheless will intrude as the dominant feeling when you study many

of the works executed by even the better class wood-engravers.

One must not overlook the very obvious fact that, in the earlier years,

an illustration was a much more serious affair for all concerned than

it is to-day. In Jackson's _Pictorial Press_ we find the author says:

'Illustration was so seldom used that the preparation of even a small

woodcut was of much moment to all concerned. I have heard William

Harvey relate that when Whittingham, the well-known printer, wanted

a new cut for his Chiswick Press Series, he would write to Harvey

and John Thompson, the engraver, appointing a meeting at Chiswick,

when printer, designer, and engraver talked over the matter with as

much deliberation as if about to produce a costly national monument.

And after they had settled all points over a snug supper, the result

of their labours was the production a month afterwards of a woodcut

measuring perhaps two inches by three. At that time perhaps only a

dozen persons besides Bewick were practising the art of wood-engraving

in England.'

But this preamble does not seek to excuse the meagre record it

prefaces. A complete bibliography of such a fecund illustrator as Sir

John Gilbert would need a volume to itself. To draw up detailed lists

of all the various drawings in _The Illustrated London News_, _Punch_,

and other prominent weeklies, would be a task needing almost as much

co-operation as Dr. Murray's great Dictionary. The subject, if it

proves to be sufficiently attractive, will doubtless be done piece by

piece by future workers. I envy each his easy pleasure of pointing out

the shortcomings of this work, for no keener joy awaits the maker of a

handbook than gibbeting his predecessors, and showing by implication

how much more trustworthy is his record than theirs.

[Illustration: D. G. ROSSETTI

'THE MUSIC-MASTER'

BY WILLIAM ALLINGHAM

1855

THE MAIDS OF

ELFENMERE]

Few artistic movements are so sharply defined that their origin can be

traced to a particular moment, although some can be attributed more or

less to the influence of one man. Even the pre-Raphaelite movement,

clearly distinct as its origin appears at first glance, should not

be dated from the formal draft of the little coterie, January 13th,

1851, for, as Mr. W. M. Rossetti writes, 'The rules show or suggest

not only what we intended to do, but what had been occupying our

attention since 1848. The day when we codified proved also to be the

day when no code was really in requisition.' Nor has the autumn 1848

any better claim to be taken as the exact moment, for one cannot

overlook the fact that there was Ford Madox Brown, a pre-Raphaelite,

long before the pre-Raphaelites, and that Ruskin had published the

first volume of _Modern Painters_. There can be little doubt that it

was the influence of the so-called pre-Raphaelites and those in closest

sympathy with them, which awakened a new interest in illustration, and

so prepared the ground for the men of the sixties; but to confine our

notice from 1857 to 1867--a far more accurate period--would be to start

without sufficient reference to the work superseded by or absorbed

into the later movement. So we must glance at a few of the books which

preceded both the _Music-master_ of 1855 and the _Tennyson_ of 1857,

either volume, the latter especially, being an excellent point whence

to reckon more precisely 'the golden decade of British Art,' as Mr.

Pennell terms it so happily.

Without going back too far for our purpose, one of the first books that

contains illustrations by artists whose work extended into the sixties

(and, in the case of Tenniel, far beyond) is _Poems and Pictures_,

'A Collection of Ballads, Songs, and Poems illustrated by English

Artists' (Burns, 1846). So often was it reprinted that it came as a

surprise to discover the first edition was fourteen years earlier than

the date which is upon my own copy. Despite the ornamental borders to

each page, and many other details which stamp it as old-fashioned,

it does not require a rabid apologist of the past to discuss it

appreciatively. From the first design by C. W. Cope, to the last, _A

Storm at Sea_, by E. Duncan, both engraved by W. J. Linton, there is no

falling off in the quality of the work. The influence of Mulready is

discernible, and it seems probable that certain pencil drawings for the

_Vicar of Wakefield_, engraved in facsimile--so far as was within the

power of the craftsmen at that time--did much to shape the manner of

book-illustrations in the fifties.

Nor does it betray want of sympathy with the artists who were thus

influenced to regret that they chose to imitate drawings not intended

for illustration, and ignored in very many cases the special technique

which employs the most direct expression of the material. In _The

Mourner_, by J. C. Horsley (p. 22), you feel that the engraver

(Thompson) has done his best to imitate the softly defined line of a

pencil in place of the clearly accentuated line which is most natural

in wood. Yet even in this there is scarcely a trace of that elaborate

cross-hatching so easily produced in plate-engraving or pen drawing, so

tedious to imitate in wood. Another design, _Time_, by C. W. Cope (p.

88), shows that the same engraver could produce work of quite another

class when it was required. Curiously enough, these two, picked at

random, reappear in almost the last illustrated anthology mentioned in

these chapters, Cassell's _Sacred Poems_ (1867).

Several books earlier in date, including De la Motte Fouqué's

_Undine_, with eleven drawings by 'J. Tenniel, Junr.' (Burns, 1846),

and _Sintram and his Companions_, with designs by H. S. Selous and

a frontispiece after Dürer's _The Knight and Death_ need only be

mentioned. The _Juvenile Verse and Picture Book_ (Burns, 1848), with

many illustrations by Gilbert, Tenniel, 'R. Cruikshank,' Weigall, and

W. B. Scott, which was reissued with altered text as _Gems of National

Poetry_ (Warne, 1868), and _Æsop's Fables_ (Murray, 1848), with 100

illustrations by Tenniel, deserve a bare mention. Nor should _The 'Bon

Gaultier' Ballads_ (Blackwood, 1849) be forgotten. The illustrations

by Doyle, Leech, and Crowquill were enormously popular in their day,

and although the style of humour which still keeps many of the ballads

alive has been frequently imitated since, and rarely excelled, yet its

drawings have often been equalled and surpassed, humorous although they

are, of their sort.

_The Salamandrine_, a poem by Charles Mackay, issued in a small

quarto (Ingram, Cooke, and Co., 1853), with forty-six designs by John

Gilbert, is one of the early volumes by the more fecund illustrators

of the century. It is too late in the day to praise the veteran whose

paintings are as familiar to frequenters of the Royal Academy now as

were his drawings when the Great Exhibition entered a formal claim for

the recognition of British Art. Honoured here and upon the Continent,

it is needless to eulogise an artist whom all agree to admire. The

prolific invention which never failed is not more evident in this

book than in a hundred others decorated by his facile pencil, yet it

reveals--as any one of the rest must equally--the powerful mastery

of his art, and its limitations. Thomson's _Seasons_, illustrated

by the Etching Club (1852), S. C. Hall's _Book of British Ballads_

(1852), an edition of _The Arabian Nights_, with 600 illustrations by

W. Harvey (1852), and _Uncle Tom's Cabin_, with 100 drawings by George

Thomas, can but be named in passing. Gray's _Elegy_, illustrated by 'B.

Foster, G. Thomas, and a Lady,' (Sampson Low), _The Book of Celebrated

Poems_, with eighty designs by Cope, Kenny Meadows, and others (Sampson

Low), _The Vicar of Wakefield_, with drawings by George Thomas, _The

Deserted Village_, illustrated by members of the Etching Club--Cope, T.

Creswick, J. C. Horsley, F. Tayler, H. J. Townsend, C. Stenhouse, T.

Webster, R.A., and R. Redgrave--all published early in the fifties--may

also be dismissed without comment. About the same time the great mental

sedative of the period--Tupper's _Proverbial Philosophy_ (Hatchard,

1854)--was reprinted in a stately quarto, with sixty-two illustrations

by C. W. Cope, R.A., E. H. Corbould, Birket Foster, John Gilbert, J.

C. Horsley, F. R. Pickersgill and others, engraved for the most part

by 'Dalziel Bros.' and H. Vizetelly. The dull, uninspired text seems

to have depressed the imagination of the artists. Despite the notable

array of names, there is no drawing of more than average interest in

the volume, except perhaps _To-morrow_ (p. 206), by F. R. Pickersgill,

which is capitally engraved by Dalziel and much broader in its style

than the rest.

_Poems by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow_ (David Bogue, 1854) appears

to be the earliest English illustrated edition of any importance of

a volume that has been frequently illustrated since. This book is

uniform with the _Poetical Works of John Milton_ with 120 engravings

by Thompson, Williams, etc., from drawings by W. Harvey, _The Works

of William Cowper_ with seventy-five illustrations engraved by J.

Orrin Smith from drawings by John Gilbert; Thomson's _Seasons_ with

illustrations 'drawn and engraved by Samuel Williams,' and _Beattie

and Collins' Poems_ with engravings by the same hand from designs by

John Absolon. The title-page of the Longfellow says it is illustrated

by 'Jane E. Benham, Birket Foster, etc.' It is odd to find the not

very elegant, 'etc.' stands for John Gilbert and E. Wehnert, also

to note that the engravers have in each of the above volumes taken

precedence of the draughtsman. Except that we miss the pre-Raphaelite

group for which we prize the Moxon _Tennyson_ to-day, the ideal of

these books is very nearly the same as of that volume. This edition

of Longfellow must not be confused with another, a quarto, issued the

following year (Routledge, 1855), 'with over one hundred designs drawn

by John Gilbert and engraved by the brothers Dalziel.' This notable

instance of the variety and inventive power of the artist also shows

(in the night pieces especially, pp. 13, 360), that the engraver was

trying to advance in the direction of 'tone' and atmospheric effect;

and endeavouring to give the effect of a 'wash' rather than of a line

drawing or the imitation of a steel engraving. This tendency, which

was not the chief purpose of the work of the sixties, in the seventies

carried the technicalities of the craft to its higher achievements, or,

as some enthusiasts prefer to regard it, to its utter ruin, so that the

photographic process-block could beat it on its own ground. But these

opposite views have been threshed out often enough without bringing

the parties concerned nearer together to encourage a new attempt to

reconcile the opposing factions. The Longfellow of 1855 was reissued

with the addition of _Hiawatha_ in 1856. Another edition of _Hiawatha_,

illustrated by G. H. Thomas, issued about this time, contains some of

his best work.

Allingham's _Music-master_ (Routledge, 1855) is so often referred to

in this narrative that its mere name must suffice in this context.

But, as the book itself is so scarce, a sentence from its preface may

be quoted: 'Those excellent painters' (writes Mr. Allingham), 'who on

my behalf have submitted their genius to the risks of wood-engraving,

will, I hope, pardon me for placing a sincere word of thanks in the

book they have honoured with this evidence through art of their varied

fancy.' To this year belongs also _The Task_, illustrated by Birket

Foster (Nisbet, 1855).

_Eliza Cook's Poems_ (Routledge, 1856) is another sumptuously

illustrated quarto gift-book with many designs by John Gilbert, J.

Wolf, Harrison Weir, J. D. Watson, and others, all engraved by Dalziel

Brothers. A notable drawing by H. H. Armstead, _The Trysting Place_ (p.

363), deserves republication. In this year appeared also the famous

edition of Adams's _Sacred Allegories_ with a number of engravings

from original drawings by C. W. Cope, R.A., J. C. Horsley, A.R.A.,

Samuel Palmer, Birket Foster, and George C. Hicks. The amazing quality

of the landscapes by Samuel Palmer stood even the test of enormous

enlargement in lantern slides, when Mr. Pennell showed them at his

lectures on the men of the sixties; had W. T. Green engraved no other

blocks, he might be ranked as a great craftsman on the evidence of

these alone.

In _George Herbert's Poetical Works_ (Nisbet, 1856), with designs by

Birket Foster, John Clayton, and H. N. Humphreys, notwithstanding the

vitality of the text, the drawings are sicklied over with the pale cast

of religious sentimentality which has ruined so much religious art in

England. A draughtsman engaged on New Testament subjects of that time

rarely forgot Overbeck, Raphael, or still more 'pretty' masters. In the

religious illustrations of the period many landscapes are included,

some of them exquisite transcripts of English scenery, others of the

'Oriental' order dear to the Annuals. The delightful description of one

of these imaginary scenes, by Leland, 'Hans Breitmann,' will come to

mind, when he says of its artist that

'All his work expanded with expensive fallacies,

Castles, towered walls, pavilions, real-estately palaces.

In the foreground lofty palm-trees, as if full of soaring love,

Bore up cocoa-nuts and monkeys to the smiling heavens above;

Jet-black Indian chieftains--at their feet, too, lovely girls

were sighing,

With an elephant beyond them, here and there a casual lion.'

George Herbert the incomparable may be hard to illustrate, but, if the

task is attempted, it should be in any way but this delineation of

pretty landscapes, with 'here and there a casual lion.' This reflection

upon the mildly sacred compositions of 'gift-book' art generally,

although provoked by this volume, is applicable to nearly every one of

its fellows.

In _Rhymes and Roundelays_, illustrated by Birket Foster (Bogue, 1856),

the designs are not without a trace of artificiality, but it contains

also some of the earliest and best examples of a most accomplished

draughtsman, and in it many popular blocks began a long career of

'starring,' until from guinea volumes some were used ultimately in

children's primers and the like.

_The Works of William Shakespeare_ illustrated by John Gilbert

(Routledge, 1856-8) will doubtless be remembered always as his

masterpiece. At a public dinner lately, an artist who had worked with

Sir John Gilbert on the _Illustrated London News_, and in nearly

all the books of the period illustrated by the group of draughtsmen

with whom both are associated, spoke of his marvellous rapidity--a

double-page drawing done in a single night. Yet so sure is his touch

that in the mass of these hundreds of designs to Shakespeare you

are not conscious of any scamping. Without being archæologically

impeccable, they suggest the types and costumes of the periods they

deal with, and, above all, represent embodiments of actual human

beings. They stand apart from the grotesque caricatures of an earlier

school, and the academic inanities of both earlier and later methods.

Virile and full of invention, the book is a monument to an artist who

has done so much that it is a pleasure to discover some one definite

accomplishment that from size alone may be taken as his masterpiece, if

merely as evidence that praise, scantily bestowed elsewhere, is limited

by space only.

[Illustration: FORD MADOX BROWN

WILLMOTT'S 'POETS OF THE

NINETEENTH CENTURY,' 1857

THE PRISONER

OF CHILLON]

Scott's _Lady of the Lake_, illustrated by John Gilbert, appeared in

1856. The other volumes, _Marmion_, the _Lady of the Lake_, and the

_Lay of the Last Minstrel_, appear to have been published previously;

but to ascertain their exact date of issue, the three bulky volumes of

the British Museum catalogue devoted to 'Scott (Walter)' can hardly

be faced with a light heart. This year saw an edition of Bunyan's

_Pilgrim's Progress_ with outline drawings by J. R. Clayton, who is

sometimes styled 'J. R.,' and sometimes 'John.' An illustrated guinea

edition of a once popular 'goody' book, _Ministering Children_, with

designs by Birket Foster and H. Le Jeune (Nisbet, 1856), an edition

of _Edgar Allan Poe's Works_, illustrated by E. H. Wehnert and others

(Addey, 1856); Coleridge's _Ancient Mariner_, with pictures by Birket

Foster, A. Duncan, and E. H. Wehnert, are also of this year, to which

belongs, although it is post-dated, Pollok's _Course of Time_ (W.

Blackwood, 1857), a book containing fifty fine illustrations by Birket

Foster, John Tenniel, and J. R. Clayton, engraved by Edward Evans,

Dalziel Brothers, H. N. Woods, and John Green. A block by Dalziel,

after Clayton, on page 19, shows a good example of the white line,

used horizontally, for the modelling of flesh, somewhat in the way,

as Pannemaker employed it so effectively in many of Gustave Doré's

illustrations years after. The twenty-seven Birket Fosters are full of

the special charm that his work possesses, and show once again how a

great artist may employ a method, which, merely 'pretty' in inferior

hands, has something of greatness when he touches it.

In the next year appeared the famous '_Poems by Alfred Tennyson,

D.C.L._, Poet-Laureate. London. Edward Moxon, Dover St., 1857.' Not

even the bare fact that it was illustrated appears on the title-page.

As the book has been re-issued lately in a well-printed edition, a

detailed list of its contents is hardly necessary; nor need any of

the illustrations be reproduced here. It will suffice to say that

Dante Gabriel Rossetti is represented by five designs to _The Lady of

Shallott_ (p. 75), _Mariana_ (p. 82), _Palace of Art_ (pp. 113-119),

_Sir Galahad_ (p. 305); Millais has eighteen, W. Holman Hunt seven, W.

Mulready four, T. Creswick six, J. C. Horsley six, C. Stanfield six,

and D. Maclise two. A monograph by Mr. G. Somes Layard, _Tennyson and

his pre-Raphaelite Illustrators_ (Stock, 1894), embodies a quantity

of interesting facts, with many deductions therefrom which are not so

valuable. In the books about Rossetti and the pre-Raphaelites, and

their name is legion, this volume has rarely escaped more or less

notice, so that one hesitates to add to the mass of criticism already

bestowed. The whole modern school of decorative illustrators regard

it rightly enough as the genesis of the modern movement; but all the

same it is only the accidental presence of D. G. Rossetti, Holman

Hunt, and Millais, which entitles it to this position. It satisfies

no decorative ideal as a piece of book-making. Except for these few

drawings, it differs in no respect from the average 'quarto poets'

before and after. The same 'toned' paper, the same vignetted pictures,

appear; the proportions of the type-page are merely that in ordinary

use; the size and shape of the illustrations was left apparently to

pure chance. Therefore, in place of talking of the volume with bated

breath as a masterpiece, it would be wiser to regard it as one of the

excellent publications of the period, that by the fortuitous inclusion

of a few drawings, quite out of touch with the rest, has acquired a

reputation, which, considered as a complete book, it does not deserve.

The drawings by Rossetti, even as we see them after translation by the

engraver had worked his will, must needs be valued as masterpieces,

if only for the imagination and thought compressed into their limited

space, and from their exquisite manipulation of details. At first

sight, some of these--for instance, the soldier munching an apple in

the _St. Cecilia_--seem discordant, but afterwards reveal themselves

as commentaries upon the text--not elucidating it directly, but

embroidering it with subtle meanings and involved symbolism. Such

qualities as these, whether you hold them as superfluous or essential,

separate these fine designs from the jejune simplicity of the mass of

the decorative school to-day. To draw a lady with 'intense' features,

doing nothing in particular, and that in an anatomically impossible

attitude, is a poor substitute for the fantasy of Rossetti. No amount

of poorly drawn confused accessories will atone for the absence of the

dominant idea that welded all the disturbing elements to a perfect

whole. One artist to-day, or at most two, alone show any real effort

to rival these designs on their own ground. The rest appear to believe

that a coarse line and eccentric composition provide all that is

required, given sufficient ignorance of academic draughtsmanship.

[Illustration: JOHN GILBERT

WILLMOTT'S 'POETS OF THE

NINETEENTH CENTURY,' 1857

HOHENLINDEN]

[Illustration: F. R. PICKERSGILL

WILLMOTT'S 'POETS OF THE

NINETEENTH CENTURY,' 1857

THE WATER

NYMPH]

Another book of the same year, _The Poets of the Nineteenth Century_,

selected and edited by the Rev. Robert Aris Willmott (Routledge, 1857),

is in many respects quite as fine as the Tennyson, always excepting the

pre-Raphaelite element, which is not however totally absent. For in

this quarto volume Millais' _Love_ (p. 137) and _The Dream_ (p. 123)

are worthy to be placed beside those just noticed. Ford Madox Brown's

_Prisoner of Chillon_ (p. 111) is another masterpiece of its sort.

For this we are told the artist spent three days in a dissecting-room

(or a mortuary--the accounts differ) to watch the gradual change in a

dead body, making most careful studies in colour as well as monochrome

all for a foreshortened figure in a block 3-3/4 by 5 inches. This

procedure is singularly unlike the rapid inspiration which throws off

compositions in black and white to-day. In a recent book received with

well-deserved applause, some of the smaller 'decorative designs' were

produced at the rate of a dozen in a day. The mere time occupied in

production is of little consequence, because we know that the

apparently rapid 'sketch' by Phil May may have taken far more time than

a decorative drawing, with elaborately minute detail over every inch of

its surface; but, other qualities being equal, the one produced with

lavish expenditure of care and thought is likely to outlive the trifle

tossed off in an hour or two. In the _Poets of the Nineteenth Century_

the hundred engravings by the brothers Dalziel include twenty-one of

Birket Foster's exquisite landscapes, all with figures; fourteen by W.

Harvey, nine by John Gilbert, six by J. Tenniel, five by J. R. Clayton,

eleven by T. Dalziel, seven by J. Godwin, five by E. H. Corbould, two

by D. Edwards, five by E. Duncan, seven by J. Godwin, and one each

by Arthur Hughes, W. P. Leitch, E. A. Goodall, T. D. Hardy, F. R.

Pickersgill, and Harrison Weir--a century of designs not unworthy as

a whole to represent the art of the day; although Rossetti and Holman

Hunt, who figure so strongly in the Tennyson, are not represented. This

year John Gilbert illustrated the _Book of Job_ with fifty designs;

_The Proverbs of Solomon_ (Nisbet, 1858), a companion volume, contains

twenty drawings.

Another noteworthy volume is Barry Cornwall's _Dramatic Scenes and

other Poems_ (Chapman and Hall, 1857) illustrated by many of the

artists already mentioned. The fifty-seven engravings by Dalziel

include one block on p. 45, from a drawing by J. R. Clayton, which is

here reprinted--not so much for its design as for its engraving; the

way the breadth of the drapery is preserved, despite the elaborate

pattern on its surface, stamps it as a most admirable piece of work.

Thornbury's _Legends of the Cavaliers and Roundheads_ (Hurst and

Blackett, 1857), was illustrated by H. S. Marks.

So far the few books of 1857 noticed have considerable family likeness.

The Bunyan's _Pilgrim's Progress_ (Nisbet, 1857), illustrated with

twenty designs by G. H. Thomas, more slight in its method, reflects

the journalistic style of its day rather than the elaborate 'book'

manner, which in many an instance gives the effect of an engraving

'after' a painting or a large and highly-wrought fresco. As one of

the many attempts to illustrate the immortal Protestant romance it

deserves noting. To this year belongs _The Poetical Works of Edgar

Allan Poe_, illustrated with some striking designs by John Tenniel,

and others by F. R. Pickersgill, R.A., Birket Foster, Percival

Skelton; and besides these, Felix Darley, P. Duggan, Jasper Cropsey,

and A. W. Madot--draughtsmen whose names are certainly not household

words to-day. In the lists of 'artists' the portrait of the author

is attributed to 'daguerreotype'! one of the earliest instances I

have encountered of the formal appearance of the ubiquitous camera

as an artist. Longfellow's prose romance, _Kavanagh_ (Kent, 1857),

with exquisite illustrations by Birket Foster, appeared this year;

_Hyperion_ (Dean), illustrated by the same author, being issued the

following Christmas.

_Poetry and Pictures from Thomas Moore_ (Longman, 1857), the _Poems

and Songs of Robert Burns_ (Bell and Daldy, 1857), both illustrated by

Birket Foster and others, and _The Fables of Æsop_, with twenty-five

drawings by C. H. Bennett, also deserve a passing word. _Gertrude of

Wyoming_, by Thomas Campbell (Routledge, 1857), is only less important

from its dimensions, and the fact that it contains only thirty-five

illustrations, engraved by the brothers Dalziel, as against the

complete hundred of most of its fellows. The drawings by Birket Foster,

Thomas Dalziel, Harrison Weir, and William Harvey include some very

good work.

_Lays of the Holy Land_ (Nisbet, 1858), clad in binding of a really

fine design adapted from Persian sources, is another illustrated

quarto, with one drawing at least--_The Finding of Moses_--by J.

E. Millais, which makes it worth keeping; a 'decorative' _Song of

Bethlehem_, by J. R. Clayton, is ahead of its time in style; the rest

by Gilbert, Birket Foster, and others are mostly up to their best

average. The title-page says 'from photographs and drawings,' but as

every block is attributed to an artist, the former were without doubt

redrawn and the source not acknowledged--a habit of draughtsmen which

is not obsolete to-day.

[Illustration: J. R. CLAYTON

BARRY CORNWALL'S

'DRAMATIC SCENES'

1857

OLYMPIA AND

BIANCA]

[Illustration: J. E. MILLAIS

'HOME AFFECTIONS FROM

THE POETS,' 1858

THERE'S NAE LUCK

ABOUT THE HOUSE]

[Illustration: J. E. MILLAIS

'HOME AFFECTIONS FROM

THE POETS,' 1858

THE BORDER

WIDOW]

Perhaps the most important illustrated volume of the next year is

_The Home Affections [portrayed] by the Poets_, by Charles Mackay

(Routledge, 1858), which continues the type of quarto gilt-edged toned

paper table-books so frequent at this time. Its illustrations are a

hundred in number, all engraved by Dalziels. Its artists include Birket

Foster, John Gilbert, J. R. Clayton, Harrison Weir, T. B. Dalziel, S.

Read, John Abner, F. R. Pickersgill, R.A., John Tenniel, with many

others, 'and' (as play-bills have it) J. Everett Millais, A.R.A.

_There's nae Luck about the House_ (p. 245) and _The Border Widow_

(p. 359) are curiously unlike in motive as well as handling; the one,

with all its charm, is of the Mulready school, the other intense and

passionate, highly wrought in the pre-Raphaelite manner. Yet after the

Millais' all the other illustrations in the book seem poor. A landscape

by Harrison Weir (p. 193), _Lenore_, by A. Madot (p. 159), a very

typical Tenniel, _Fair Ines_ (p. 135), _Oriana_ (p. 115), _Hero and

Leander_ (p. 91), _The Hermit_ (p. 67), and _Good-night in the Porch_

(p. 195), by Pickersgill, claim a word of appreciation as one turns

over its pages anew. Whether too many copies were printed, or those

issued were better preserved by their owners than usual, no book is

more common in good condition to-day than this.

Another book of the same size, with contents less varied, it is true,

but of almost the same level of excellence, is _Wordsworth's Selected

Poems_ (Routledge, 1859), illustrated by Birket Foster, J. Wolf, and

John Gilbert. This contains the hundred finely engraved blocks by

the brothers Dalziel, some of them of the first rank, which was the

conventional equipment of a gift-book at that time.

Other noteworthy volumes of 1858-9 are _Merrie Days of England,

Sketches of Olden Times_, illustrated by twenty drawings by Birket

Foster, G. Thomas, E. Corbould, and others; _The Scouring of the

White Horse_, with designs by Richard Doyle (Macmillan), his Foreign

Tour of _Brown, Jones, and Robinson_, and the same artist's _Manners

and Customs of the English_, all then placed in the first rank by

most excellent critics; _Favourite English Poems of the last two

Centuries_, illustrated by Birket Foster, Cope, Creswick, and the rest;

Wordsworth's _White Doe of Rylstone_ (Longmans), also illustrated by

Birket Foster and H. N. Humphreys; _Childe Harold_, with many designs

by Percival Skelton and others; Blair's _Grave_, illustrated by

Tenniel (A. and C. Black); Milton's _Comus_ (Routledge, 1858), with

illustrations by Pickersgill, B. Foster, H. Weir, etc.; and C. H.

Bennett's _Proverbs with Pictures_ (Chapman and Hall). _Thomas Moore's

Poems_ (Longmans, 1858); _Child's Play_, by E. V. B., appeared also

about this time. Krummacher's _Parables_, with forty illustrations by

J. R. Clayton (Bohn's Library, 1858), is another unfamiliar book likely

to be overlooked, although it contains good work of its sort; inspired

a little by German design possibly, but including some admirable

drawings, those for instance on pages 147 and 347. _The Shipwreck_,

by Robert Falconer, illustrated by Birket Foster (Edinburgh, Black,

1858), contains thirty drawings, some of them charmingly engraved by W.

T. Green, Dalziel Brothers, and Edward Evans in 'the Turner vignette'

manner; they are delightful of their kind.

In 1859 there seems to be a falling off, which can hardly be traced

to the starting of _Once a Week_ in July, for Christmas books--and

nearly all the best illustrated volumes fall into that category--are

prepared long before midsummer. C. H. Bennett's illustrated Bunyan's

_Pilgrim Progress_ (Longmans) is one of the best of the year's output.

A survival of an older type is _A Book of Favourite Modern Ballads_,

illustrated by C. W. Cope, J. C. Horsley, A. Solomon, S. Palmer, and

others (Kent), which, but for the publisher's announcement, might well

be regarded as a reprint of a book at least ten years earlier; but its

peculiar method was unique at that time, and rarely employed since,

although but lately revived now for half-tone blocks. It consists in

a double printing, black upon a previous printing in grey, not solid,

but with the 'lights' carefully taken out, so that the whole looks like

a drawing on grey paper heightened by white chalk. Whether the effect

might be good on ordinary paper, these impressions on a shiny cream

surface, set in gold borders, are not captivating.

_Odes and Sonnets_, illustrated by Birket Foster (Routledge, 1859), has

also devices by Henry Sleigh, printed in colours. It is not a happy

experiment; despite the exquisite landscapes, the decoration accords

so badly that you cannot linger over its pages with pleasure. _Byron's

Childe Harold_, with eighty illustrations by Percival Skelton, is

another popular book of 1859.

_Hiawatha_, with twenty-four drawings by G. H. Thomas, and _The

Merchant of Venice_ (Sampson Low, 1860), illustrated by G. H. Thomas,

Birket Foster, and H. Brandling, with ornaments by Harry Rogers, are

two others a trifle belated in style. Of different sort is _The Voyage

of the Constance_, a tale of the Arctic Seas (Edinburgh, Constable),

with twenty-four drawings by Charles Keene, a singularly interesting

and apparently scarce volume which reveals powers of imagining

landscape which he had never seen in a very realistic manner. I once

heard him declare that he had never in his life been near either an

Irish bog or a Scotch moor, both subjects being very frequent in his

work.

_The Seasons_, by James Thomson (Nisbet, 1859), illustrated by

Birket Foster, F. R. Pickersgill, R.A., J. Wolf, G. Thomas, and Noel

Humphreys, is another small quarto gift-book with the merits and

defects of its class. Yet, after making all due allowance, one feels

that even these average volumes of the fifties, if they do not interest

us as much as those of the sixties, are yet ahead, in many important

qualities, of the average Christmas gift-book to-day. The academic

scholarship and fine craft of this era would equip a whole school of

'decorative students,' and leave still much to spare. Yet if we prefer,

in our heart of hearts, the Birmingham books to-day, this is merely

to confess that modernity, whether it be frankly actual, or pose as

mediæval, attracts us more than a far worthier thing out of fashion

for the moment. But such preference, if it exists, is hardly likely to

outlast a serious study of the books of 'the sixties.'

English Illustration 'The Sixties': 1855-70 With Numerous Illustrations by Ford Madox Brown: A. Boyd Houghton: Arthur Hughes: Charles Keene: M. J. Lawless: Lord Leighton, P.R.A.: Sir J. E. Millais, P.R.A.: G. Du Maurier: J. W. North, R.A.: G. J. Pinwell: Dante Gabriel Rossetti: W. Small: Frederick Sandys: J. Mcneill Whistler: Frederick Walker, A.R.A.: and Others · 第 7 / 13 章