CHAPTER XXII.

LORD BYRON'S MARRIAGE AND ITS CONSEQUENCES.

Lord Byron's marriage exercised such a deplorable influence over his

destiny, that it is impossible to speak of it succinctly, and without

entering into details; for this one great misfortune proved the fruitful

source of all others.

If we were permitted to believe that Providence sometimes abandons men

here below to the influence of an evil genius, we might well conceive

this baneful intervention in the case of Lord Byron's conjugal union,

and all the circumstances that led to it.

It was but a few months after having returned from his travels in the

East, that Lord Byron published his first cantos of "Childe Harold," and

obtained triumphs as an orator in the House of Lords. Presenting himself

thus for the first time to the public, surrounded by all the prestige

belonging to a handsome person, rank, and youth,--in a word, with such

an assemblage of qualities as are seldom if ever found united in one

person--he immediately became the idol of England. The enemies created

by his boyish satire, and augmented by the jealousy his success could

not fail to cause, now hid themselves like those vile insects that slink

back into their holes on the first appearance of the sun's rays, ready

to creep out again when fogs and darkness return. Living then in the

midst of the great world, in the closest intimacy with many of the fair

sex, and witnessing the small amount of wedded happiness enjoyed by

aristocratic couples within his observation, intending also to wing his

flight eventually toward climes more in unison with his tastes, he no

longer felt that attraction for marriage which he had experienced in

boyhood (like most youths), and he said, quite seriously, that if his

cousin, George Byron, would marry, he, on his part, would willingly

engage not to enter into wedlock. But his friends saw with regret that

his eyes were still seeking through English clouds the blue skies of the

East; and that he was kept in perpetual agitation by the fair ones who

would cast themselves athwart his path, throwing themselves at his head

when not at his feet. Vainly did he distort himself, give himself out to

the public as a true "Childe Harold," malign himself; his friends knew

that his heart was overflowing with tenderness, and they could not thus

be duped. If he had wished to cull some flowers idly, for the sake of

scattering their leaves to the breeze, as youth so often does, this sort

of amusement would have been difficult for him, for the fine ladies of

his choice, if once they succeeded in inspiring him with some kind of

tender feeling, fastened themselves upon him in such a passionate way

that his freedom became greatly shackled, and they generally ended by

making the public the confidante of their secret.

Lord Byron had some adventures that brought him annoyance and grief.

They made him fall into low spirits,--a sort of moral apathy and

indifference for every thing. His best friends, and the wisest among

them, thought that the surest way of settling him in England, and

getting him out of the scrapes into which he was being dragged by female

enthusiasm, would be for him to marry, and they advised him to it

pertinaciously. Lord Byron, ever docile to the voice of affection, did

not repel the counsels given, but he made them well understand that he

should marry from reason rather than choice; and the letter he wrote,

when Moore insisted on his choosing a certain beautiful girl of noble

birth,[138] well explains his whole state of mind at this time:--

"I believe," said he, "that you think I have not been quite fair with

that Alpha and Omega of beauty with whom you would willingly have

united me. Had Lady ---- appeared to wish it, I would have gone on, and

very possibly married with the same indifference which has frozen over

the Black Sea of almost all my passions. It is that very indifference

which makes me so uncertain and apparently capricious. It is not

eagerness of new pursuits, but that nothing impresses me _sufficiently_

to fix. I do not feel disgusted, but simply indifferent to almost all

excitements; and the proof of this is that obstacles, the slightest

even, stop me. This can hardly be timidity, for I have done some

imprudent things, too, in my time; and in almost all cases opposition is

a stimulus. In this circumstance it is not; if a straw were in my way I

could not stoop to pick it up. I have sent you this long tirade, because

I would not have you suppose that I have been trifling designedly with

you or others. If you think so, in the name of St. Hubert (the patron of

antlers and hunters) _let me be married out of hand, I don't care to

whom_, so it amuses any body else, and don't interfere with me much in

the daytime."

But that to which Lord Byron most aspired was always to wing his flight

to brighter skies.

"Your climate kills me," he wrote to Hodgson, directly after his return

from the East. And then again, "My inclinations and my health make me

wish to leave England; neither my habits nor constitution are improved

by your customs or your climate. I shall find employment in making

myself a good Oriental scholar. I shall buy a mansion in one of the

fairest islands, and describe, at intervals, the most interesting

portions of the East."

Lord Byron wrote this before he had attained great celebrity, but this

did not change either his sentiments or his tastes. Notwithstanding the

embarrassments arising from the legacy left him by his great uncle, and

which were principally caused by the action brought against him on

account of the illegal sale of the Rochdale mines (a suit which Lord

Byron gained, but the expenses of which were ruinous), he was

nevertheless sufficiently rich to live at ease, to let his needy friends

enjoy the profits arising from his works, and to allow himself acts of

beneficence and generosity that were the joy of his heart. And when he

had done all that, he still found that he could not spend the surplus

in England according to his tastes. After the death of his mother, no

longer bound by his promise to her of not selling Newstead, he resolved

on effecting the sale so as to settle his affairs definitively. The sale

having failed, the forfeit brought him in L25,000; and he wrote to

Moore, in September, 1814:--

"I shall know to-morrow whether a circumstance, of importance enough to

change all my plans, will occur or not.[139] If it does not, I am off

for Italy next month.

"I have a few thousand pounds which I can't spend after my own heart in

this climate, and so I shall go back to the south. Hobhouse, I think and

hope, will go with me; but whether he will or not, I shall. I want to

see Venice and the Alps, and Parmesan cheeses, and look at the coasts of

Greece, or rather Epirus, from Italy as I once did, or fancied I did,

that of Italy, when off Corfu."

A few days before writing this letter, his evil destiny had led him to

take a step fatal to all his future happiness.

A person, for whom he entertained both affection and deference,

observing one day how unsettled he appeared in his state of mind and

projects for the future, again reiterated, with more earnestness than

ever, the advice to marry.

After long discussions Lord Byron promised to do so. But who should be

the object of his choice? A young lady was named who seemed to possess

all the qualities requisite for giving happiness in marriage. Lord

Byron, on his side, suggested Miss Milbank, with whom he was then in

correspondence. She was a niece of Lady Melbourne, who had thought of

this union a year before; a circumstance which probably decided Lord

Byron's preference, for he liked Lady Melbourne very much.

On hearing Miss Milbank's name his friend protested with great energy,

begging him to remark, among other things, that Miss Milbank had no

actual fortune, that his affairs were too much embarrassed for him to be

able to marry a woman without money, and moreover that Miss Milbank was

a learned lady, a _blue-stocking_, who could not possibly suit him. Ever

docile to the voice of friendship, Lord Byron yielded, and allowed his

friend to write a proposal to the other lady. Soon after a negative

answer arrived, one morning, that the two friends were together.

"You see," said Lord Byron, "that after all it is Miss Milbank I am to

marry; I shall write to her!" He did so immediately; and when the letter

was finished, his friend feeling more and more opposed to such a choice,

took it from him. After having read it, he exclaimed:--

"Truly, this letter is so charming that it is a pity for it not to go. I

never read a better effusion." "Then go it shall," replied Lord Byron,

who sealed and sent it off, thus signing his own misfortune!

We have said that he was in correspondence with Miss Milbank. This is

how he had made her acquaintance.

Two years previously, at a London _soiree_, he saw sitting in the corner

of a sofa a young girl whose simplicity of dress made her look as if she

belonged to a less elevated position than most of the other girls in the

room; Moore told him, however, that she was a rich heiress, Miss

Milbank, and that if he would marry her she might help him to restore

the old Abbey of Newstead. Her modest look, in striking contrast with

the stiffness and formality common to the aristocracy, interested Lord

Byron. He had himself introduced, and some time after ended by asking

her to marry him. His proposal, from motives that could not wound him,

was not accepted then. But a year later Miss Milbank testified the

desire of entering into correspondence with him. Thus the ground was

prepared. When he sent his letter with a fresh proposal, it was accepted

all the more eagerly that a report had been spread of his wishing to

marry a young and beautiful Irish girl, which did not please Miss

Milbank. Her answer was couched in very flattering terms, and the fatal

marriage was thus decided on. This was perhaps the only time in his life

that Lord Byron did not follow the counsels of friendship. It would

indeed seem as if an evil genius had taken possession of his will.

Warnings were not wanting; but he refused to listen to them. "If you

have any thing to say against my decision," wrote he to Moore, in his

usual jesting way, after the marriage had been agreed on, "I beg you to

say it. My resolve is taken, so positively, fixed, and irrevocably,

that I can very well listen to reason, since now it can do me no more

harm."

And so he married Miss Milbank three months afterward. During the

interval between the promise exchanged and the ceremony concluded, Lord

Byron saw his betrothed frequently. Had he no warning, no inspiration

from his good genius during all that time? Had he no fear of such

perfection? Did he not feel that a faultless coat of mail, like hers,

might so have pressed upon her heart that no pulse would be left giving

earnest of life? Might not tenderness, piety, indulgence, forbearance,

the most amiable and sublime virtues belonging to a Christian woman,

have their place filled in the breast of this perfect creature by

another kind of sublimity? and was it not very possible that she would

increase by one the number of those chaste wives who judge, condemn,

punish, and never forgive any thing that does not enter into the

category of their virtues, or rather of the single virtue they practice,

and under shadow of which they consider themselves able to dispense with

all others? Did he not fear that the profound mathematical knowledge of

that learned person might have slightly deadened her heart and given a

dogmatic tone to her mind, of which he doubtless with his usual

penetration suspected the narrowness, likely to render its science

pernicious to the heart? All this is easily to be believed, when we see

how preoccupied he was before marriage.

"At the beginning of the month of December, being called up to town by

business, I had opportunities, from being a good deal in my noble

friend's society, of observing the state of his mind and feelings under

the prospect of the important change he was now about to undergo; and it

was with pain I found that those sanguine hopes with which I had

sometimes looked forward to the happy influence of marriage, in winning

him over to the brighter and better side of life, were, by a view of all

the circumstances of his present destiny considerably diminished. While,

at the same time, not a few doubts and misgivings, which had never

before so strongly occurred to me, with regard to his own fitness, under

any circumstances, for the matrimonial tie, filled me altogether with a

degree of foreboding anxiety as to his fate, which the unfortunate

events that followed but too fully justified."

Lord Byron might still have avoided this misfortune by giving up

marriage; but the die was cast. His evil genius presented him with no

other alternative than to rush on to the catastrophe.

We must add that if, unfortunately, the halo of perfection supposed to

encircle the heiress was calculated to make him tremble, it was also of

a nature to flatter his self-love. This reputation was, in the eyes of

Moore, the principal cause of his preference for Miss Milbank. However

that may be, in the last days of December, accompanied by his friend Mr.

Hobhouse, he set out for Seaham, the residence of Sir Ralph, Miss

Milbank's father. And on the morning of the 2d of January, surrounded by

visions of the past, by gloomy forebodings, having in his hand the fatal

ring that had been dug up in his garden at the moment when Miss

Milbank's consent arrived; with a beating heart, and eyes all dizzy,

that would have made him draw back, if his honor had not been too far

engaged, Lord Byron advanced toward the altar. From that fatal day, if

his star of glory did not cease to shine, or even if it shone more

brightly seen through the atmosphere of misfortune, nevertheless repose

and lasting happiness were gone for him.

An heiress for a wife, but who had no actual fortune, naturally forced

him into great expenses, that soon went beyond his resources. His

creditors, lured by the riches said to belong to Miss Milbank, came down

upon him, as if the wife's fortune could be used to pay the husband's

debts.

His marriage had taken place in January, and already, in October, he was

obliged to sell his library. Shortly afterward his furniture was seized,

and he had to undergo humiliations, all the more keenly felt, that they

were quite unmerited, since his debts were inherited with the property.

Lord Byron--who had a real horror of debt--with his spirit of justice,

moderate desires, simple tastes, detached as he was from material

enjoyments, and even, perhaps, through pride, would never have fallen

into such embarrassments if he had remained _unmarried_. Indeed, his

creditors were patiently awaiting the sale of some property. Besides, he

was rich enough while unmarried; he could exercise hospitality, travel

in good style, not even keep for himself the produce of his works, and,

above all, never refuse to perform works of charity and benevolence. He

wrote to one of his friends before marriage that his affairs were about

to be settled, that he could live comfortably in England, and buy a

principality, if he wished, in Turkey.

Thus, then, marriage alone drew upon him this new disaster, which he

must have felt severely, and which, doubtless, led him to make

reflections little favorable to the tie so fatally contracted. Then it

was that he would have required to meet with kindness, indulgence, and

peace at home; thus supported, his heart would have endured every thing.

Instead of that, what did he find? A woman whose jealousy was extreme,

and who had her own settled way of living, and was unflinching in her

ideas; who united a conviction of her own wisdom to perfect ignorance of

the human heart,[140] all the while fancying that she knew it so well;

who, far from consenting to modify her habits, would fain have imposed

them on others. In short, a woman who had nothing in common with him,

who was unable to understand him, or to find the road to his heart or

mind; finally, one to whom forgiveness seemed a weakness, instead of a

virtue. Is it, then, astonishing that he should have suffered in such a

depressing atmosphere; that he should sometimes have been irritable, and

have even allowed to escape him a few words likely to wound the

susceptible self-love of his wife?

Lady Byron possessed one of those minds clever at reasoning, but weak in

judgment; that can _reason_ much without being _reasonable_, to use the

words of a great philosophical moralist of our day; one of those minds

that act as if life were a problem in jurisprudence or geometry; who

argue, distinguish, and, by dint of syllogisms, _deceive themselves

learnedly_. She always deceived herself in this way about Lord Byron.

When she was in the family way, and her confinement drawing near, the

storm continued to gather above her husband's head. He was in

correspondence with Moore, then absent from London. Moore's

apprehensions with regard to the happiness likely to result from a union

that had never appeared suitable in his eyes, had, nevertheless, calmed

down on receiving letters from Lord Byron that expressed satisfaction.

Yet during the first days of what is vulgarly termed the "honey-moon,"

Lord Byron sent Moore some very melancholy verses, to be set to music,

said he, and which begin thus:--

"There's not a joy the world can give like that it takes away."

Moore had already felt some vague disquietude, and he asked why he

allowed his mind to dwell on such sorrowful ideas? Lord Byron replied

that he had written these verses on learning the death of a friend of

his childhood, the Duke of Dorset, and, as his subsequent letters were

full of jests, Moore became reassured. Lord Byron said he was happy, and

so he really was; for Lady Byron, not being jealous then, continued to

be gentle and amiable.

"But these indications of a contented heart soon ceased. His mention of

the partner of his home became more rare and formal, and there was

observable, I thought, through some of his letters, a feeling of unquiet

and weariness that brought back all those gloomy anticipations which I

had, from the first, felt regarding his fate."

Above all, there were expressions in his letters that seemed of sad

augury. For instance, in announcing the birth of his little girl, Lord

Byron said that he was absorbed in five hundred contradictory

contemplations, although he had only one single object in view, which

would probably come to nothing, as it mostly happens with all we

desire:--

"But never mind," he said, "as somebody says, '_for the blue sky bends

over all_.' I only could be glad if it bent over me where it is a little

bluer, like _skyish top of blue Olympus_."

On reading this letter, dated the 5th of January, full of aspirations

after a blue sky, Moore was struck with the tone of melancholy pervading

it; and, knowing that it was Lord Byron's habit when under the pressure

of sorrow and uneasiness, to seek relief in expressing his yearnings

after freedom and after other climes, he wrote to him in these terms:--

"Do you know, my dear Byron, there was something in your last letter--a

sort of mystery, as well as a want of your usual elasticity of

spirits--which has hung upon my mind unpleasantly ever since. I long to

be near you, that I might know how you really look and feel, for these

letters tell nothing, and one word _a quattr' occhi_, is worth whole

reams of correspondence. But only do tell me you are happier than that

letter has led me to fear, and I shall be satisfied."

"It was," says Moore, "only a few weeks after the exchange of these

letters, that Lady Byron took the resolution of separating from him. She

had left London at the end of January, on a visit to her parents, in

Leicestershire, and Lord Byron was to come and join her there soon

after. They had parted with mutual demonstrations of attachment and of

good understanding. On the journey Lady Byron wrote a letter to her

husband, couched in playful, affectionate language. What, then, must

have been his astonishment when, directly after her arrival at Kirby

Mallory, her father, Sir Ralph, wrote to tell Lord Byron that his

daughter was going to remain with them, and would return to him no

more."

This unexpected stroke fell heavily upon him. The pecuniary

embarrassments growing up since his marriage (for he had already

undergone eight or nine executions in his own house), had then reached

their climax. He was then, to use his own energetic expression, _alone

at his hearth, his penates transfixed around_; and then was he also

condemned to receive the unaccountable intelligence that the wife who

had just parted from him in the most affectionate manner, had abandoned

him forever.

His state of mind can not be told, nor, perhaps, be imagined. Still he

describes it in some passages of his letters, showing at the same time

the firmness, dignity, and strength of mind that always distinguished

him. For example, he wrote to Rogers, two weeks after this thunderbolt

had fallen upon him:--

"I shall be very glad to see you if you like to call, though I am at

present contending with the 'slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,'

some of which have struck me from a quarter whence I did not, indeed,

expect them; but, no matter, there is a 'world elsewhere,' and I will

cut my way through this as I can. If you write to Moore, will you tell

him that I shall answer his letter the moment I can muster time and

spirits. Ever yours,

BYRON."

This strength of mind he only found a month afterward, and then he wrote

to him:--

"I have not answered your letter for a time, and at present the reply to

it might extend to such a length that I shall delay it till it can be

made in person, and then I will shorten it as much as I can. I am at war

_with all the world and my wife_, or, rather, all the world and my wife

are at war with me, and have not yet crushed me, and shall not crush me,

whatever they may do. I don't know that in the course of a hair-breadth

existence I was ever, at home or abroad, in a situation so completely

uprooted of present pleasure, or rational hope for the future, as this

time. I say this because I think so, and feel it. But I shall not sink

under it the more for that mode of considering the question. I have made

up my mind.

"By the way, however, you must not believe all you hear on the subject;

but don't attempt to defend me. If you succeeded in that it would be a

mortal, or an immortal, offense. Who can bear refutation?"[141]

And, after having spoken of his wife's family, he concludes in these

terms:--

"Those who know what is going on say that the mysterious cause of our

domestic misunderstandings is a Mrs. C----, now a kind of house-keeper

and spy of Lady N----, who was a washer-woman in former days."

Swayed by this idea, he went so far then in his generosity as to

exonerate his wife, and accuse himself; whereupon Moore answered that,

"_after all, his misfortunes lay in the choice he had made of a wife,

which he_ (Moore) _had never approved_."

Lord Byron hastened to reply that he was wrong, and that Lady Byron's

conduct while with him had not deserved the smallest reproach, giving

her, at the same time, great praise. But this answer, which, according

to Moore, _forces admiration for the generous candor of him who wrote it

while adding to the sadness and strangeness of the whole affair_--this

answer, of such extraordinary generosity, will better find its place

elsewhere. It contains expressions that show his real state of soul

under the cruel circumstances:--

"I have to battle with all kinds of unpleasantness, including private

and pecuniary difficulties, etc.

" ...It is nothing to bear the _privations_ of adversity, or, more

properly, ill-fortune, but my pride recoils from its _indignities_.

However, I have no quarrel with that same pride, which will, I think, be

my buckler through every thing. If my heart could have been broken it

would have been so years ago, and by events more afflicting than

these.... Do you remember the lines I sent you early last year? I don't

wish to claim the character of 'Vates' the prophet, but were they not a

little prophetic? I mean those beginning: 'There's not a joy the world

can,' etc. They were the truest, though the most melancholy, I ever

wrote."

To this letter Moore answered immediately:--

"I had certainly no right to say any thing about the _unluckiness of

your choice_, though I rejoice now that I did, as it has drawn from you

a tribute which, however unaccountable and mysterious it renders the

whole affair, is highly honorable to both parties. What I meant in

hinting a doubt with respect to the object of your selection, did not

imply the least impeachment of that perfect amiableness which the world,

I find, by common consent, allows to her. I only feared that she might

have been too perfect, too _precisely_ excellent, _too matter-of-fact a

paragon for you to coalesce with comfortably_, ... and that a person

whose perfection hung in more easy folds about her, whose brightness was

softened down by some of 'those fair defects which best conciliate

love,' would, by appealing more dependently to your protection, have

stood a much better chance with your good-nature. All these

suppositions, however, I have been led into by my intense anxiety to

acquit you of any thing like a capricious abandonment of your wife; and,

totally in the dark as I am with respect to all but the fact of your

separation, you can not conceive the solicitude--the fearful

solicitude--with which I look forward to a history of the transaction

from your own lips when we meet--a history in which I am sure of at

least one virtue, manly candor."

Those who knew Lord Byron, gifted as he was with so much that seemed to

render it impossible for any woman to resign herself to the loss of his

love; with so much to make a wife proud of bearing his name; may well

ask what strange sort of nature Lady Byron could have possessed to act

as she did toward him; and whether, if she really married out of vanity

(as Lord Byron one day told Medwin, at Pisa), and her heart being full

of pride only, she found some greater satisfaction for her vanity in the

courage and perseverance she fancied displayed in deserting him. But, in

order to view her inexplicable conduct with any sort of indulgence, we

must say that Lady Byron was an only and a spoilt child, a slave to

rule, to habits and ideas as unchanging and inflexible as the figures

she loved to study; that, being accustomed to the comforts of a rich

house, where she was idolized, she could not do without her regular

comforts, so generally appreciated and considered necessary by English

people. But it was no easy matter to satisfy all her tastes with

mathematical regularity, to let her keep up all her habits, and, above

all, to make Lord Byron share them in their married life. In the first

place, Lord Byron, who was naturally un-English in taste, had, moreover,

through his long stay abroad, given up the peculiarities of English

habits. He did not dine every day, and when he did it was a cenobite's

meal, little suited to the taste of a true Englishman. He breakfasted on

a cup of green tea, without sugar, and the yolk of an egg, which was

swallowed standing. The comfortable fireside, the indispensable

roast-beef, and the regular evening tea, were not appreciated by him;

and, indeed, it was a real pain to him to see women eat at all. Not one

of his young wife's habits was shared by him. He did not think his soul

lost by going to bed at dawn, for he liked to write at night; or by

doing other things at what she called irregular hours; and he must have

been at least astonished on hearing himself asked, three weeks after

marriage, _when he intended giving up his versifying habits_?

But he did not give them up; nor could he have done so had he wished it.

Lady Byron must have flattered herself with the idea of ruling him, of

showing the world her power over her husband. As long as their resources

sufficed for a life of luxury, both parties might have cherished

illusion, and put off reflection. But when creditors, attracted by the

name of the wealthy heiress--who in reality had only brought her

expectations with her--began to pour in, and that pecuniary

embarrassment and humiliations were added to home incompatibilities,

then, perhaps, Lord Byron became irritable sometimes, and Lady Byron

must have felt more than ever the painful absence of those comforts

whose enjoyment cause many other annoyances to be forgotten. She must

often have compared her life then, full of mortifications, and, perhaps,

of solitude, with the one so comfortable and agreeable (for her) she

formerly led at Kirby Mallory, in the midst of her relatives. Indeed,

they had spent two months there, both saying they were happy; for at

this period of the honey-moon, Lord Byron, kind as he was, doubtless

yielded to all the caprices and habits of his hosts. Nevertheless,

through the veil of his customary jests and assurances to Moore that he

was quite satisfied, it is easy to see how tired he was, and how little

the life at Seaham was suited to him.

"I am in such a state of sameness and stagnation, and so totally

occupied in consuming the fruits, and sauntering, and playing dull games

at cards, and yawning, and trying to read old 'Annual Registers' and the

daily papers, and gathering shells on the shore, and watching the growth

of stunted gooseberry bushes in the garden, that I have neither time nor

sense to say more than yours ever,

BYRON."

And then another time he wrote,--

"I have been very comfortable here, listening to that d----d monologue

which elderly gentlemen call conversation, and in which my pious

father-in-law repeats himself every evening, except when he plays upon

the fiddle. However, they have been very kind and hospitable, and I like

them and the place vastly."

Again, feeling his thought in bondage at Seaham, when it would fain have

wandered free beneath some sunny sky, he wrote to Moore, "By the way,

don't engage yourself in any travelling expedition, as I have a plan of

travel into Italy, which we will discuss. And then, think of the poesy

wherewithal we should overflow from Venice to Vesuvius, to say nothing

of Greece, through all which--God willing--we might perambulate."

But on quitting Seaham to return home, without preventing Lady Byron

from continuing to follow her own tastes, it is likely that he wished to

resume his old habits: his beloved solitude, so necessary to him, his

fasts, his hours for study and rest, very different from those of

Seaham. And then she must have found it troublesome to have a husband,

who was not only indifferent to English comforts, but who even disliked

to see women eat! who, despite his embarrassments, continued to refuse

appropriating for his own use the money given and offered by his

publisher, making it over instead to the poor, and even borrowing to

help his friends and indigent authors.[142] She could not have known how

he would ever get disentangled. Being _extremely jealous_, she became

the easy dupe of malicious persons; and under the influence of that

wicked woman, Mrs. Claremont, allowed herself to be persuaded that her

husband committed grave faults, though in reality they were but slight

or even imaginary ones. She forced open his writing-desk, and found in

it several proofs of intrigues that had taken place _previous_ to his

marriage. In the frenzy of her jealousy, Lady Byron sent these letters

to the husband of the lady compromised, but he had the good sense to

take no notice of them. Such a revolting proceeding on the part of Lady

Byron requires no commentary: it can not be justified. Meanwhile the

conjugal abode was given up to bailiffs, and desolation reigned in Lord

Byron's soul. He had lately become a father. This was the moment that

his wife chose for leaving him; and the first proof of love she gave

their daughter, as soon as she set foot in her own home, was to abandon

that child's father and the house where she could no longer find the

mode of life to which she had been accustomed. At Kirby Mallory, the

vindictive Lady Noel, who detested Lord Byron, doubtless did the rest,

together with the governess. And the young heiress, just enriched by a

legacy inherited from an uncle, thus newly restored to wealth, had not

courage to leave it and them all again. With the kind of nature she

possessed, she must have taken pride in a sort of exaggerated firmness;

thus seeking to gain strength for trampling under foot all

heart-emotions, as if they were so many weaknesses, incompatible with

the stern principles that she considered virtues. By assuming the point

of view proper to some minds, it is easy to conceive all this,

especially when one knows England.

But was it really for the purpose of allowing her to give such a

spectacle to the world, and to secure for herself the comforts of life,

that God had given to her keeping Lord Byron's noble spirit? Did she

forget that it was not simply a good, honest, ordinary man, like the

generality of husbands, that she had married; but that Heaven, having

crowned his brow with the rays of genius, imposed far other obligations

on his companion? Did she forget that she was responsible before God and

before that country whose pride he was about to become? Ought she to

have preferred an easy life to the honor of being his wife; of

sustaining him in his weaknesses; of consoling and forgiving him, if

necessary; in short, of being his guardian angel? If she aspired to the

reputation of a virtuous woman, could true virtue have done otherwise?

Ere this God has judged her above; but, here below, can those possessing

hearts have any indulgence for her?

We hear constantly repeated--because it was once said--that men of great

genius are less capable than ordinary individuals of experiencing calm

affections and of settling down into those easy habits which help to

cement domestic life. By dint of repeating this it has become an axiom.

But on what grounds is it founded? Because these privileged beings give

themselves to studies requiring solitude, in order to abstract and

concentrate their thoughts; because, their mental riches being greater,

they are more independent of the outer world and the intellectual

resources of their fellow-creatures; because, through the abundance of

their own resources, their mind acquires a certain refinement, likely to

make them deem the society of ordinary persons tiresome; does it

therefore necessarily follow that the goodness and sensibility of their

hearts are blunted, and that there may not be, amid the great variety of

women, hearts and minds worthy of comprehending them, and of making it

their duty to extend a larger amount of forbearance and indulgence in

return for the glory and happiness of being the companions of these

noble beings? It is remarked, in support of the above theory, that

almost all men of genius who have married--Dante, Milton, Shakspeare,

Dryden, Byron, and many others--were unhappy. But have these observers

examined well on which side lay the cause of unhappiness? Who will say

that if Dante, instead of Gemma Donati, "the ferocious wife" (a thought

expressed by Lord Byron in his "Prophecy," evidently to appropriate it

to himself, speaking of "_the cold companion who brought him ruin for

her dowry_);" who will say that if Dante, instead of Gemma Donati, had

married his Beatrice Portinari, she would not have been the companion

and soother of his exile? that the bread of the foreigner shared with

her would not have seemed _less bitter_? and that he would not have

found it _less fatiguing to mount, leaning on her, the staircase leading

to another's dwelling_?--

"Lo scendere e il salio per l'altrin scale."--DANTE.

And can we doubt that Milton's misfortune was caused by his unhappy

choice of a wife, since almost directly after her arrival at their

conjugal home she became alarmed at her husband's literary habits and

also at the solitude and poverty reigning in the house, and finally

abandoned him after a month's trial? To speak only of England, was it

not from similar causes, or nearly so, that the amiable Shakspeare's

misfortune arose--also that of Dryden, Addison, Steele? And, indeed, the

same may be said of all the great men belonging to whatsoever age or

country.

If we were to enter into a polemic on this subject, or simply to make

conscientious researches, there would be many chances of proving, in

opposition to the axiom, that the fault of these great men lay in the

bad choice of their helpmates. In truth, if there have been a Gemma

Donati and a Milbank, we also find in ancient times a Calpurnia and a

Portia among the wives of great men; and, in modern times, wives of

poets, who have been the honor of their sex, proud of their husbands,

and living only for them. Ought not these examples at least to destroy

the absolute nature of the theory, making it at best conditional? The

larger number of great men, it is true, did not marry; of this number

we find, Michael Angelo, Raphael, Petrarch, Ariosto, Tasso, Cervantes,

Voltaire, Pope, Alfieri, and Canova; and many others among the poets and

philosophers, Bacon, Newton, Galileo, Descartes, Bayle, and Leibnitz.

What does that prove, if not that they either would not or could not

marry, but certainly not that they were incapable of being good

husbands? Besides, a thousand causes--apart from the fear of being

unhappy in domestic life, considerations of fortune, prior attachments,

etc.--may have prevented them. But as to Lord Byron, at least, it is

still more certain with regard to him than to any other, that he might

have been happy had he made a better choice: if circumstances had only

been tolerable, as he himself says. Lord Byron had none of those faults

that often disturb harmony, because they put the wife's virtue to too

great a trial. If the best disposition, according to a deep moralist, is

that which gives much and exacts nothing, then assuredly his deserves to

be so characterized. Lord Byron exacted nothing for himself. Moreover,

discussion, contradiction, teasing, were insupportable to him; his

amiable jesting way even precluded them. In all the circumstances and

all the details of his life he displayed that high generosity, that

contempt of petty, selfish, material calculations so well adapted for

gaining hearts in general, and especially those of women. Add to that

the _prestige_ belonging to his great beauty, his wit, his grace, and it

will be easy to understand the love he must have inspired as soon as he

became known.

"Pope remarks," says Moore, "that extraordinary geniuses have the

misfortune to be admired rather than loved; but I can say, from my own

personal experience, that Lord Byron was an exception to this

rule."[143]

Nevertheless, Lord Byron, though exceptional in so many things, yet

belonged to the first order of geniuses. Therefore he could not escape

some of the laws belonging to these first-rate natures: certain habits,

tendencies, sentiments--I may almost say infirmities--of genius deriving

their _origin from the same sympathies, the same wants_.

He required to have certain things granted to him: his hours for

solitude, the silence of his library, which he sometimes preferred to

every thing, even to the society of the woman he loved. It was wrong to

wish by force to shut him up to read the Bible, or to make him come to

tea and regulate all his hours as a good priest might do. When he was

plunged in the delights of Plato's "Banquet," or conversing with his own

ideas, it was folly to interrupt him. But this state was exceptional

with him. "_One does not have fever habitually_," said he of himself,

characterizing this state of excitement that belongs to composition; and

as soon as he returned to his usual state, and that his mind, disengaged

from itself, came down from the heights to which it had soared, what

amiability then, what a charm in all he said and did! Was not one hour

passed with him then a payment with rich usury for all the little

concessions his genius required? And lastly, if we descend well into the

depths of his soul, by all he said and did, by all his sadness, joy,

tenderness, we may be well convinced that none more than he was

susceptible of domestic happiness.

"If I could have been the husband of the Countess G----," said he to

Mrs. B----, a few days only before setting out for Greece, "we should

have been cited, I am certain, as samples of conjugal happiness, and our

retired domestic life would have made us respectable! But alas! I can

not marry her."

It is also by his latest affections that he proved how, if he had been

united to a woman after his own heart, he might have enjoyed and given

all the domestic happiness that God vouchsafes us here below, and that

when love should have undergone the transformations produced by time and

custom, he would have known how to replace the poetic enchantments of

love's first days, by feelings graver, more unchanging too, and no less

tender and sacred.

But we must interrogate those who knew and saw him personally, and in

the first place Moore; for not only was Moore acquainted with Lord

Byron's secret soul, but to him had the poet confided the treasure of

his memoirs, whose principal object was to throw light on the most fatal

event of his life, and whose sacrifice, made in deference to the

susceptibilities of a few living nullities, will be an eternal remorse

for England. Now this is how Moore expresses himself on this subject:--

"With respect to the causes that may be supposed to have led to this

separation, it seems needless, with the characters of both parties

before our eyes, to go in quest of any very remote or mysterious reasons

to account for it."

After observing that men of great genius have never seemed made for

domestic happiness, through certain habits, certain wants of their

nature, and certain faults, which appear, he says, like the shade thrown

by genius in proportion to its greatness, Moore adds that Lord Byron

still was, in many respects, _a singular exception to this rule_, for

his heart was so sensitive and his passions so ardent, that the world of

reality never ceased to hold a large place in his sympathies; that for

the rest, his imagination could never usurp the place of reality,

neither in his feelings nor in the objects exciting them.

"The poet in Lord Byron," says Moore, "never absorbed the man. From this

very mixture has it arisen that his pages bear so deeply the stamp of

real life, and that in the works of no poet with the exception of

Shakspeare, can every various mood of the mind--whether solemn or gay,

whether inclined to the ludicrous or the sublime, whether seeking to

divert itself with the follies of society or panting after the grandeur

of solitary nature--find so readily a strain of sentiment in accordance

with its every passing tone."

Nevertheless he did not completely escape the usual fate of great

geniuses, since he also experienced, though rarely, and always with good

cause, that sadness which, as Shakspeare says,--

"Sicklies the face of happiness itself."

"To these faults, and sources of faults, inherent in his own sensitive

nature, he added also many of those which a long indulgence of self-will

generates--the least compatible, of all others, with that system of

mutual concession and sacrifice by which the balance of domestic peace

is maintained. In him they were softened down by good-nature. When we

look back, indeed, to the unbridled career, of which this marriage was

meant to be the goal--to the rapid and restless course in which his life

had run along, like a burning train, through a series of wanderings,

adventures, successes, and passions, the fever of all which was still

upon him, when, with the same headlong recklessness, he rushed into

this marriage, it can but little surprise us that, in the space of one

short year, he should not have been able to recover all at once from his

bewilderment, or to settle down into that _tame level_ of conduct which

the close observers of his every action required. As well might it be

expected that a steed like his own Mazeppa's--

'Wild as the wild deer and untaught,

With spur and bridle undefiled,'

should stand still, when reined, without chafing or champing the

bit.[144]

"Even had the new condition of life into which he passed been one of

prosperity and smoothness, some time, as well as tolerance, must still

have been allowed for the subsiding of so excited a spirit into rest.

But, on the contrary, his marriage was at once a signal for all the

arrears and claims of a long-accumulating state of embarrassment to

explode upon him; his door was almost daily beset by duns, and his house

nine times during that year in possession of bailiffs; while, in

addition to these anxieties, he had also the pain of fancying that the

eyes of enemies and spies were upon him, even under his own roof, and

that his every hasty word and look were interpreted in the most

perverted light.

"He saw but little society, his only relief from the thoughts which a

life of such embarrassment brought with it was in those avocations which

his duty, as a member of the Drury Lane Committee, imposed upon him. And

here, in this most unlucky connection with the theatre, one of the

fatalities of his short year of trial, as husband, lay. From the

reputation which he had previously acquired for gallantries, and the

sort of reckless and boyish levity to which--often in very bitterness of

soul--he gave way, it was not difficult to bring suspicion upon some of

those acquaintances which his frequent intercourse with the green-room

induced him to form, or even (as in one instance was the case) to

connect with his name injuriously that of a person to whom he had

scarcely ever addressed a single word.

"Notwithstanding, however, this ill-starred concurrence of

circumstances, which might have palliated any excesses either of temper

or conduct into which they drove him, it was, after all, I am persuaded,

to no such serious causes that the unfortunate alienation, which so soon

ended in disunion, is to be traced.

"'In all the unhappy marriages I have ever seen,' says Steele, 'the

great cause of evil has proceeded from slight occasions,' and to this

remark, I think, the marriage under our consideration would not be

found, upon inquiry, to be an exception. Lord Byron himself, indeed,

when at Cephalonia, a short time before his death, seems to have

expressed, in a few words, the whole pith of the mystery.

"An English gentleman, with whom he was conversing on the subject of

Lady Byron, having ventured to enumerate to him the various causes he

had heard alleged for the separation, the noble poet, who had seemed

much amused with their absurdity and falsehood, said, after listening to

them all: 'The causes, my dear sir, were too simple to be easily found

out.'

"In truth, the circumstances, so unexampled, that attended their

separation, the last words of the wife to the husband being those of the

most playful affection, while the language of the husband toward the

wife was in a strain, as the world knows, of tenderest eulogy, are in

themselves a sufficient proof that, at the time of their parting, there

could have been no very deep sense of injury on either side. It was not

till afterward that, in both bosoms, the repulsive force came into

operation, when, to the party which had taken the first decisive step in

the strife, it became naturally a point of pride to persevere in it with

dignity, and this unbendingness provoked, as naturally, in the haughty

spirit of the other, a strong feeling of resentment which overflowed, at

last, in acrimony and scorn. If there be any truth, however, in the

principle, that they never pardon who have done the wrong, Lord Byron,

who was, to the last, disposed to reconciliation, proved, at least, that

his conscience was not troubled by any very guilty recollections.

"But though it would have been difficult perhaps, for the victims of

this strife themselves to have pointed out the real cause for their

disunion, beyond that general incompatibility which is the canker _of

all such marriages_, the public, which seldom allows itself to be at

fault on these occasions, was, as usual, ready with an ample supply of

reasons for the breach, all tending to blacken the already-darkly

painted character of the poet, and representing him, in short, as a

finished monster of cruelty and depravity. The reputation of the object

of his choice for every possible virtue, was now turned against him by

his assailants, as if the excellences of the wife were proof positive of

every enormity they chose to charge upon the husband. Meanwhile, the

unmoved silence of Lady Byron under the repeated demands made for a

specification of her charges against him, left to malice and imagination

the fullest range for their combined industry. It was accordingly

stated, and almost universally believed, that the noble lord's second

proposal to Miss Milbank had been but with a view to revenge himself for

the slight inflicted by her refusal of the first, and that he himself

had confessed so much to her on their way from the church. At the time

when, as the reader has seen from his own honey-moon letters, he in all

faith fancied himself happy, and even boasted, in the pride of his

imagination, that if marriage were to be upon lease, he would gladly

renew his own for a term of ninety-nine years!

"At this very time, according to these veracious chronicles, he was

employed in darkly following up the aforesaid scheme of revenge, and

tormenting his lady by all sorts of unmanly cruelties--such as firing

off pistols, to frighten her as she lay in bed, and other such

freaks.[145] To the falsehoods concerning his green-room intimacies, and

particularly with respect to one beautiful actress, with whom, in

reality, he had hardly ever exchanged a single word, I have already

adverted; and the extreme confidence with which this tale was circulated

and believed affords no unfair specimen of the sort of evidence with

which the public, in all such fits of moral wrath, is satisfied. It is,

at the same time, very far from my intention to allege that, in the

course of the noble poet's intercourse with the theatre, he was not

sometimes led into a line of acquaintance and converse, unbefitting, if

not dangerous to, the steadiness of married life. But the imputations

against him on this head were not the less unfounded, as the sole case

in which he afforded any thing like real grounds for such an accusation

did not take place till after the period of the separation.

"Not content with such ordinary and tangible charges, the tongue of

rumor was emboldened to proceed still further; and, presuming upon the

mysterious silence maintained by one of the parties, ventured to throw

out dark hints and vague insinuations, of which the fancy of every

hearer was left to fill up the outline as he pleased. In consequence of

all this exaggeration, such an outcry was now raised against Lord Byron

as, in no case of private life, perhaps, was ever before witnessed; nor

had the whole amount of fame which he had gathered, in the course of the

last four years, much exceeded in proportion the reproach and obloquy

that were now, within the space of a few weeks, heaped upon him. In

addition to the many who, no doubt, conscientiously believed and

reprobated what they had but too much right, whether viewing him as poet

or man of fashion, to consider credible excesses, there were also

actively on the alert that large class of persons who seem to think that

inveighing against the vices of others is equivalent to virtue in

themselves, together with all those natural haters of success who,

having long been disgusted with the splendor of the poet, were now

enabled, in the guise of champions for innocence, to wreak their spite

on the man. In every various form of paragraph, pamphlet, and

caricature, both his character and person were held up to odium. Hardly

a voice was raised, or at least listened to, in his behalf; and though a

few faithful friends remained unshaken by his side, the utter

hopelessness of stemming the torrent was felt as well by them as by

himself, and, after an effort or two to gain a fair hearing, they

submitted in silence."

As to Lord Byron, he hardly attempted to defend himself. Among all these

slanders, he only wished to repel one that wounded his generous pride

beyond endurance; and so he wrote to Rogers:--

"You are of the few persons with whom I have lived in what is called

intimacy, and have heard me at times conversing on the untoward topic of

my recent family disquietudes. Will you have the goodness to say to me

at once, whether you ever heard me speak of her with disrespect, with

unkindness, or defending myself at her expense by any serious imputation

of any description against her? Did you never hear me say, 'that when

there was a right or a wrong, she had the right?' The reason I put these

questions to you or others of my friends is, because I am said, by her

and hers, to have resorted to such means of exculpation."

It makes one's heart bleed to see this noble intellect forced by the

stupid cruel persecution of wicked fools to descend into the arena and

justify himself. But he soon ceased all kind of defense. A struggle of

this sort was most repugnant to him. At first Lord Byron had counted on

his wife's return, which would, indeed, have proved his best

justification. When he saw this return deferred, he asked simply for an

inquiry, but could not obtain what he solicited. His accusers, unable to

state any thing definite against him, naturally preferred calumny and

_magnanimous_ silence to inquiry! At last, when he felt that reunion had

become improbable, and that his friends, for want of moral courage and

independence, confined themselves to mere condolence, he sought for

strength in the testimony of conscience and in his determination of one

day making the whole truth known. And he did so in effect, a year later,

while he was in Italy, and when all hope of reunion was over. Then it

was that he wrote his memoirs.

Here perhaps I ought to speak of one of England's greatest crimes, or

rather, of the crime committed by a few Englishmen: I mean _the

destruction of his memoirs_, a deed perpetrated for the sake of

screening the self-love and the follies, if not the crimes, of a whole

host of insignificant beings. But, having already spoken of that in

another chapter, I will content myself with repeating here that these

memoirs were all the more precious, as their principal object was to

make known the truth; that the impression they left on the mind was a

perfect conviction of the writer's sincerity; that Lord Byron possessed

the most generous of souls, and that the separation had no other cause

but incompatibility of disposition between the two parties. Had he not

given irrefragable proof of the truth of these memoirs, by sending them

to be read and _commented on_ by Lady Byron? We know with what cruel

disdain she met this generous proceeding. As to their morality, I will

content myself with quoting the exact expressions used by Lady B----,

wife of the then ambassador in Italy, to whom Moore gave them to read,

and who had copied them out entirely:--

"_I read these memoirs at Florence_," said she to Countess G----, "_and

I assure you that I might have given them to my daughter of fifteen to

read, so perfectly free are they from any stain of immorality._"

Let us then repeat once more, that they, as well as the last cantos of

"Don Juan," and the journal he kept in Greece, were sacrificed for the

sole purpose of destroying all memento of the guilty weakness of persons

calling themselves his friends, and also of hiding the opinions, not

always very flattering, entertained by Lord Byron about a number of

living persons, who had unfortunately survived him. It is difficult to

conceive in any case, how these memoirs written at Venice, when his

heart was torn with grief and bitterness, could possibly have been

silent as to the injustice and calumny overwhelming him, or even as to

the pusillanimous behavior of so-called friends; while even writers

generally hostile no longer took part against him.

For example, this is how Macaulay speaks of him,--Macaulay who was not

over-lenient toward Lord Byron, whom he never personally knew, and who

is seldom just as well from party spirit as from his desire of shining

in antithesis and high-sounding phrases:--

"At twenty-four he found himself on the highest pinnacle of literary

fame, along with Walter Scott, Wordsworth, Southey, and a crowd of other

distinguished writers. There is scarcely an instance in history of so

sudden a rise to so dizzy an eminence. Every thing that could stimulate,

and every thing that could gratify the strongest propensities of our

nature, the gaze of a hundred drawing-rooms, the acclamation of the

whole nation, the applause of applauded men, the love of lovely

women,--all this world, and all the glory of it, were at once offered to

a youth to whom nature had given violent passions, and whom education

had never taught to control them. He lived as many men live who have no

similar excuse to plead for their faults. But his countrymen and

countrywomen would love and admire him. They were resolved to see in his

excesses only the flash and outbreak of that same fiery mind which

glowed in his poetry. He attacked religion; yet in religious circles his

name was mentioned with fondness, and in many religious publications his

works were censured with singular tenderness. He lampooned the prince

regent, yet he could not alienate the Tories. Every thing, it seemed,

was to be forgiven to youth, rank, and genius.[146]

"Then came the reaction. Society, capricious in its indignation as it

had been capricious in its fondness, flew into a rage with its froward

and petted darling. He had been worshiped with an irrational idolatry.

He was persecuted with an irrational fury. Much has been written about

those unhappy domestic occurrences which decided the fate of his life.

Yet nothing is, nothing ever was, positively known to the public but

this,--that he quarrelled with his lady, and that she refused to live

with him. There have been hints in abundance, and shrugs and shakings of

the head, and '_Well, well, we know_,' and '_We could if we would_,' and

'_If we list to speak_,' and '_There be that might an they list._' But

we are not aware that there is before the world, substantiated by

credible, or even by tangible evidence, a single fact indicating that

Lord Byron was _more to blame than any other man who is on bad terms

with his wife_."

And after having said how the persons consulted by Lady Byron, and who

had advised her to separate from her husband, formed their opinion

without hearing both parties, and that it would be quite unjust and

irrational to pronounce, or even to form, an opinion on an affair so

imperfectly known, Mr. Macaulay continues in these words:--

"We know no spectacle so ridiculous as the British public in one of its

periodical fits of morality. In general, elopements, divorces, and

family quarrels, pass with little notice. We read the scandal, talk

about it for a day, and forget it. But once in six or seven years our

virtue becomes outrageous. We can not suffer the laws of religion and

decency to be violated. We must make a stand against vice. We must teach

libertines that the English people appreciate the importance of domestic

ties. Accordingly some unfortunate man, in no respect more depraved than

hundreds whose offenses have been treated with lenity, is singled out as

an expiatory sacrifice. If he has children, they are to be taken from

him. If he has a profession, he is to be driven from it. He is cut by

the higher orders, and hissed by the lower. He is, in truth, a sort of

whipping-boy, by whose vicarious agonies all the other transgressors of

the same class are, it is supposed, sufficiently chastised. We reflect

very complacently on our own severity, and compare with great pride the

high standard of morals established in England with the Parisian laxity.

At length our anger is satiated. Our victim is ruined and heart-broken,

and our virtue goes quietly to sleep for seven years more. It is clear

that those vices which destroy domestic happiness ought to be as much as

possible repressed. It is equally clear that they can not be repressed

by penal legislation. It is therefore right and desirable that public

opinion should be directed against them. But it should be directed

against them uniformly, steadily, and temperately; not by sudden fits

and starts. There should be one weight and one measure. Decimation is

always an objectionable mode of punishment. It is the resource of judges

too indolent and hasty to investigate facts and to discriminate nicely

between shades of guilt. It is an irrational practice, even when adopted

by military tribunals. When adopted by the tribunal of public opinion,

it is infinitely more irrational. It is good that a certain portion of

disgrace should constantly attend on certain bad actions. But it is not

good that the offenders should merely have to stand the risks of a

lottery of infamy, that ninety-nine out of every hundred should escape,

and that the hundredth, perhaps the most innocent of the hundred, should

pay for all. We remember to have seen a mob assembled in Lincoln's Inn

to hoot a gentleman against whom the most oppressive proceeding known to

the English law was then in progress. He was hooted because he had been

an unfaithful husband, as if some of the most popular men of the age,

Lord Nelson for example, had not been unfaithful husbands. We remember a

still stronger case. Will posterity believe that, in an age in which men

whose gallantries were universally known, and had been legally proved,

filled some of the highest offices in the state and in the army,

presided at the meetings of religious and benevolent institutions, were

the delight of every society, and the favorites of the multitude, a

crowd of moralists went to the theatre, in order to pelt a poor actor

for disturbing the conjugal felicity of an alderman? What there was in

the circumstances either of the offender or of the sufferer to vindicate

the zeal of the audience we could never conceive. It has never been

supposed that the situation of an actor is peculiarly favorable to the

rigid virtues, or that an alderman enjoys any special immunity from

injuries such as that which on this occasion roused the anger of the

public. But such is the justice of mankind. In these cases the

punishment was excessive, but the offense was known and proved. The case

of Lord Byron was harder. True Jedwood justice was dealt out to him.

First came the execution, then the investigation, and last of all, or

rather not at all, the accusation. The public, without knowing any thing

whatever about the transactions in his family, flew into a violent

passion with him, and proceeded to invent stories which might justify

its anger. Ten or twenty different accounts of the separation,

inconsistent with each other, with themselves, and with common sense,

circulated at the same time. What evidence there might be for any one of

these the virtuous people who repeated them neither knew nor cared. For

in fact these stories were not the causes, but the effects of the public

indignation. They resembled those loathsome slanders which Lewis

Goldsmith, and other abject libellers of the same class, were in the

habit of publishing about Bonaparte; such as that he poisoned a girl

with arsenic when he was at the military school, that he hired a

grenadier to shoot Desaix at Marengo, that he filled St. Cloud with all

the pollutions of Capreae. There was a time when anecdotes like these

obtained some credence from persons who, hating the French Emperor

without knowing why, were eager to believe any thing which might justify

their hatred.

"Lord Byron fared in the same way. His countrymen were in a bad humor

with him. His writings and his character had lost the charm of novelty.

He had been guilty of the offense which, of all offenses, is punished

most severely; he had been overpraised; he had excited too warm an

interest; and the public, with its usual justice, chastised him for its

own folly. The attachments of the multitude bear no small resemblance to

those of the wanton enchantress in the Arabian Tales, who, when the

forty days of her fondness were over, was not content with dismissing

her lovers, but condemned them to expiate, in loathsome shapes, and

under cruel penances, the crime of having once pleased her too well.

"The obloquy which Byron had to endure was such as might well have

shaken a more constant mind. The newspapers were filled with lampoons.

The theatres shook with execrations. He was excluded from circles where

he had lately been the _observed_ of all _observers_. All those creeping

things that riot in the decay of nobler natures hastened to their

repast; and they were right; they did after their kind. It is not every

day that the savage envy of aspiring dunces is gratified by the agonies

of such a spirit, and the degradation of such a name. The unhappy man

left his country forever. The howl of contumely followed him across the

sea, up the Rhine, over the Alps; it gradually waxed fainter; it died

away; those who had raised it began to ask each other, what, after all,

was the matter about which they had been so clamorous, and wished to

invite back the criminal whom they had just chased from them. His poetry

became more popular than it had ever been; and his complaints were read

with tears by thousands and tens of thousands who had never seen his

face."

These observations of Macaulay are applied by Mr. Disraeli to Lord

Cadurcis, who, in his novel called "Venetia," is no other than Lord

Byron:--

"Lord Cadurcis," says he, "was the periodical victim, the scapegoat of

English morality, sent into the wilderness with all the crimes and

curses of the multitude on his head. Lord Cadurcis had certainly

committed a great crime, not his intrigue with Lady Monteagle, for that

surely was not an unprecedented offense; nor his duel with her husband,

for after all it was a duel in self-defense: and, at all events,

divorces and duels, under any circumstances, would scarcely have excited

or authorized the storm which was now about to burst over the late

spoiled child of society. But Lord Cadurcis had been guilty of the

offense which, of all offenses, is punished most severely. Lord Cadurcis

had been overpraised. He had excited too warm an interest; and the

public, with its usual justice, was resolved to chastise him for its own

folly. There are no fits of caprice so hasty and so violent as those of

society. Cadurcis, in allusion to his sudden and singular success, had

been in the habit of saying to his intimates that he 'woke one morning

and found himself famous.' He might now observe, 'I woke one morning and

found myself infamous.' Before twenty-four hours had passed over his

duel with Lord Monteagle, he found himself branded by every journal in

London as an unprincipled and unparalleled reprobate. The public,

without waiting to think, or even to inquire after the truth, instantly

selected as genuine the most false and the most flagrant of the fifty

libellous narratives that were circulated of the transaction. Stories,

inconsistent with themselves, were all alike eagerly believed, and what

evidence there might be for any one of them, the virtuous people, by

whom they were repeated, neither knew nor cared. The public, in short,

fell into a passion with their daring, and, ashamed of their past

idolatry, nothing would satisfy them but knocking the divinity on the

head."

And this same Mr. Disraeli, whose testimony is all the more precious as

coming from a Tory celebrity, after having described the shameful

reception given by the noble House to Lord Cadurcis, when he presented

himself there after the duel, and the atrocious conduct of the stupid

populace clamoring against him outside, goes on in these terms:--

"And indeed to witness this young, and noble, and gifted creature, but a

few days back the idol of the nation, and from whom a word, a glance

even, was deemed the greatest and most gratifying distinction--whom all

orders, classes, and conditions of men had combined to stimulate with

multiplied adulation, with all the glory and ravishing delights of the

world, as it were, forced upon him--to see him thus assailed with the

savage execrations of all those vile things who exult in the fall of

every thing that is great and the abasement of every thing that is

noble, was indeed a spectacle which might have silenced malice and

satisfied envy!"

To these just appreciations formed by some of Lord Byron's biographers

we might add many more; but the limits we have assigned to this work not

admitting of it, we will only add, as a last testimony, the most severe

of all; him of whom Moore said, "that, if one wished to speak against

Lord Byron, one had only to apply to him," that is, to Lord Byron

himself.

In 1820, when Lord Byron was at Ravenna, an article from "Blackwood's

Magazine," entitled "Observations on Don Juan," was sent him.

It contained such unfounded strictures on his matrimonial conduct, that,

for once, Lord Byron infringed his rule and could not help answering it.

The extracts from his defense, "_if defense it can be called_," says

Moore, "_where there has never yet been any definite charge, will be

read with the liveliest interest._" Here, then, is a part of these

extracts:--

"It is in vain, says my learned brother, that Lord Byron attempts in any

way to justify his own behavior with regard to Lady Byron.

"And now that he has so openly and audaciously invited inquiry and

reproach, we do not see any good reason why he should not be plainly

told so by the voice of his countrymen."

"How far the openness of an anonymous poem, and the audacity of an

imaginary character, which the writer supposes to be meant for Lady

Byron, may be deemed to merit this formidable denunciation from their

most sweet voices, I neither know nor care; but when he tells me that I

can not 'in any way justify my own behavior in that affair,' I

acquiesce, because no man can justify himself until he knows of what he

is accused; and I have never had--and, God knows, my whole desire has

ever been to obtain it--any specific charge, in a tangible shape,

submitted to me by the adversary, nor by others, unless the atrocities

of public rumor and the mysterious silence of the lady's legal advisers

may be deemed such.

"But is not the writer content with what has been already said and done?

Has not the general voice of his countrymen long ago pronounced upon the

subject sentence without trial, and condemnation without a charge? Have

I not been exiled by ostracism, except that the shells which proscribed

me were anonymous? Is the writer ignorant of the public opinion and the

public conduct upon that occasion? If he is, I am not: the public will

forget both long before I shall cease to remember either.

"The man who is exiled by a faction has the consolation of thinking that

he is a martyr; he is upheld by hope and the dignity of his cause, real

or imaginary: he who withdraws from the pressure of debt may indulge in

the thought that time and prudence will retrieve his circumstances; he

who is condemned by the law as a term to his banishment, or a dream of

his abbreviation; or, it may be, the knowledge or the belief of some

injustice of the law, or of its administration, in his own particular.

But he who is outlawed by general opinion, without the intervention of

hostile politics, illegal judgment, or embarrassed circumstances,

whether he be innocent or guilty, must undergo all the bitterness of

exile, without hope, without pride, without alleviation. This case was

mine. Upon what grounds the public founded their opinion I am not aware;

but it was general, and it was decisive. Of me or of mine they knew

little, except that I had written what is called poetry, was a nobleman,

had married, became a father, and was involved in differences with my

wife and her relatives, no one knew why, because the persons complaining

refused to state their grievances. The fashionable world was divided

into parties, mine consisting of a very small minority; the reasonable

world was naturally on the stronger side, which happened to be the

lady's, as was most proper and polite. The press was active and

scurrilous; and such was the rage of the day that the unfortunate

publication of two copies of verses rather complimentary than otherwise

to the subjects of both, was tortured into a species of crime, or

constructive petty treason. I was accused of every monstrous vice by

public rumor and private rancor; my name, which had been a knightly or a

noble one since my fathers helped to conquer the kingdom for William the

Norman, was tainted. I felt that, if what was whispered, and muttered,

and murmured, was true, I was unfit for England; if false, England was

unfit for me. I withdrew: but this was not enough. In other countries,

in Switzerland, in the shadow of the Alps, and by the blue depth of the

lakes, I was pursued and breathed upon by the light. I crossed the

mountains, but it was the same; so I went a little farther, and settled

myself by the waves of the Adriatic, like the stag at bay, who betakes

him to the waters.

"If I may judge by the statements of the few friends who gathered round

me, the outcry of the period to which I allude was beyond all precedent,

all parallel, even in those cases where political motives have sharpened

slander and doubled enmity."

One regrets not being able to go on reproducing these fine pages written

by Lord Byron, but the limits we have assigned ourselves force the

sacrifice.

And now, after all that has been placed before the reader, will he not

be curious to learn whether Lord Byron truly loved Lady Byron. The

answer admits of no doubt. Could love exist between two natures so

widely dissonant? But then it will be said, why did he marry her? This

question may be answered by the simple observation that two-thirds of

the marriages in high life, and indeed in all classes, are contracted

without any love, nor are the parties, therefore, condemned to

unhappiness. Still it is as well to recall that not only it did not

enter into Lord Byron's views to marry for love and to satisfy passion,

but that he married rather for the sake of escaping from the yoke of his

passions! "If I were in love I should be jealous," said he, "and then I

could not render happy the woman I married." "Let her be happy," added

he, "and then, for my part, I shall also be so." Then again we find,

"Let them only leave me my mornings free." Lastly, he wrote in his

journal, before marrying Miss Milbank, and while in correspondence with

her, "It is very singular, but there is not a spark of love between me

and Miss Milbank." If, then, Miss Milbank married Lord Byron out of

self-love, and to prevent his marrying a young and beautiful Irish girl,

Lord Byron, on his part, married Miss Milbank from motives the most

honorable to human nature. It was her _simple modest_ air that attracted

him and caused his delusion, and the fame of her virtues quite decided

him. As to interested motives, they were at most but secondary; and his

disinterestedness was all the more meritorious, since the embarrassed

state of his affairs made him really require money, and Miss Milbank had

none at that period. She was an only daughter, it is true; but her

parents were still in the prime of life, and her uncle, Lord Wentworth,

from whom her mother was to inherit before herself, might yet live many

years. His marriage with Miss Milbank was thus not only disinterested as

regards fortune, but even _imprudently generous_; for she only brought

him a small dowry of L10,000--a mere trifle compared to the life of

luxury she was to lead, in accordance with their mutual rank.[147] And

these L10,000 were not only returned by Lord Byron on their separation,

but generously doubled.

And now let us hasten to add that although Lord Byron was not in love

with Miss Milbank, he had no dislike to her person, for she was rather

pretty and pleasing in appearance. Her reputation for moral and

intellectual qualities, standing on such a high pedestal, Lord Byron

naturally conceived that esteem might well suffice to replace

tenderness. It is certain that, if she had lent herself to it more, and

if circumstances had only been endurable, their union might have

presented the same character common to most aristocratic couples in

England, and that even Lord Byron might have been able to act from

virtue in default of feeling; but that little requisite for him was

wholly wanting.

His celebrated and touching "Farewell" might be brought up as an

objection to what we have just advanced. It might be said that the word

_sincere_ is a proof of love, and _insincere_ a proof of _falsehood_.

Lastly, that in all cases there was a want of delicacy and refinement in

thus confiding his domestic troubles to the public. Well, all that would

be ill-founded, unjust, and contrary to truth. This is the truth of the

matter. Lord Byron had just been informed that Lady Byron, having sent

off by post the letter wherein she confirmed all that her father, Sir

Ralph, had written, namely, her resolution of not returning to the

conjugal roof, had afterward caused this letter to be sought for, and on

its being restored, had given way to almost mad demonstrations of joy.

Could he see aught else in this account save a certainty of the evil

influences weighing on her, and making her act in contradiction to her

real sentiments? He pitied her then as a victim, thought of all the

virtues _said_ to crown her, the illusive belief in which he was far

then from having lost; he forgot the wrongs she had inflicted on

him--the spying she had kept up around him--the calumnies spread against

him--the use she had made of the letters subtracted from his desk. Yes,

all was forgotten by his generous heart; and, according to custom, he

even went so far as to accuse himself--to see in the victim only his

wife, the mother of his little Ada! Under this excitement he was walking

about at night in his solitary apartments, and suddenly chanced to

perceive in some corner different things that had belonged to Lady

Byron--dresses and other articles of attire. It is well known how much

the sight of these inanimate mementoes has power to call up

recollections even to ordinary imaginations. What, then, must have been

the vividness with which they acted on an imagination like Lord Byron's?

His heart softened toward her, and he recollected that one day, under

the influence of sorrows which well-nigh robbed him of consciousness, he

had answered her harshly. Thinking himself in the wrong, and full of the

anguish that all these reflections and objects excited in his breast, he

allowed his tears to flow, and, snatching a pen, wrote down that

touching effusion, which somewhat eased his suffering.

The next day one of his friends found these beautiful verses on his

desk; and, judging of Lady Byron's heart and that of the public

according to his own, he imprudently gave them to the world. Thus we

can no more doubt Lord Byron's sincerity in writing them than we can

accuse him of publishing them. But what may cause astonishment is that

they could possibly have been ill-interpreted, as they were; and, above

all, that this touching "Farewell"--which made Madame de Stael say she

would gladly have been unhappy, like Lady Byron, to draw it forth--that

it should not have had power to rescue her heart from its apathy, and

bring her to the feet of her husband, or at least into his arms. Let us

add, in conclusion, that the most atrocious part of this affair, and

doubtless the most wounding for him, was precisely Lady Byron's conduct;

and in this conduct the worst was _her cruel silence_!

She has been called, after his words, the moral Clytemnestra[148] of her

husband. Such a surname is severe; but the repugnance we feel to

condemning a woman can not prevent our listening to the voice of

justice, which tells us that the comparison is still in favor of the

guilty one of antiquity. For she, driven to crime by fierce passion

overpowering reason, at least only deprived her husband of physical

life, and in committing the deed exposed herself to all its

consequences; while Lady Byron left her husband at the very moment that

she saw him struggling amid a thousand shoals, in the stormy sea of

embarrassments created by his marriage, and precisely when he more than

ever required a friendly, tender, and indulgent hand to save him from

the tempests of life. Besides, she shut herself up in silence a thousand

times more cruel than Clytemnestra's poniard, that only killed the body;

whereas Lady Byron's silence was destined to kill the soul, and such a

soul! leaving the door open to calumny, and making it to be supposed

that her silence was magnanimity destined to cover over frightful

wrongs, perhaps even depravity. In vain did he, feeling his conscience

at ease, implore some inquiry and examination. She refused, and the only

favor she granted was to send him, one fine day, two persons to see

whether he were not mad. Happily Lord Byron only discovered at a later

period the purport of this strange visit.

In vain did Lord Byron's friend, the companion of all his travels, throw

himself at Lady Byron's feet, imploring her to give over this fatal

silence. The only reply she deigned was, that she had thought him mad!

And why, then, had she believed him mad? Because she, a methodical

inflexible woman, with that unbendingness which a profound moralist

calls the worship rendered to pride by a feelingless soul;--because she

could not understand the possibility of tastes and habits different to

those of ordinary routine, or of her own starched life! Not to be hungry

when she was--not to sleep at night, but to write while she was

sleeping, and to sleep when she was up--in short, to gratify the

requirements of material and intellectual life at hours different to

hers:--all that was not merely annoying for her, but it must be

_madness!_ or if not, it betokened depravity that she could neither

submit to nor tolerate without perilling her own morality!

Such was the grand secret of the cruel silence which exposed Lord Byron

to the most malignant interpretations--to all the calumny and revenge of

his enemies.

She was perhaps the only woman in the world so strangely organized--the

only one, perhaps, capable of not feeling happy and proud at belonging

to a man superior to the rest of humanity! and fatally was it decreed

that this woman _alone_ of her species should be Lord Byron's wife!

Before closing this chapter it remains for us to examine if it be true,

as several of his biographers have pretended, that he wished to be

reunited to his wife. We must here declare that Lord Byron's intention,

in the last years of his life, was, on the contrary, not to see Lady

Byron again. This is what he wrote from Ravenna, to Moore, in June,

1820:--

"I have received a Parisian letter from W. W----, which I prefer

answering through you, as that worthy says he is an occasional visitor

of yours. In November last he wrote to me a well-meaning letter, stating

for some reasons of his own, his belief that a _reunion_ might be

effected between Lady Byron and myself.

"To this I answered as usual; and he sent me a second letter, repeating

his notions, which letter I have never answered, having had a thousand

other things to think of. He now writes as if he believed that he had

offended me by touching on the topic; and I wish you to assure him that

I am not at all so, but on the contrary, obliged by his good-nature. At

the same time _acquaint him the thing is impossible. You know this as

well as I, and there let it end._"

A year later, at Pisa, he again said to M----"_that he never would have

been reunited_ to Lady Byron; that the time for such a possibility was

passed, and he had made _quite sufficient advances_."

Let us add likewise that during the last period of his stay at Genoa, a

person whose acquaintance he had just made, thought fitting, for several

reasons and even by way of winning golden opinions among a certain set

in England, to insist on this matter with Lord Byron.

In order to succeed, this person represented Lady Byron as a victim,

telling him she was very ill physically and morally, and declaring the

secret cause to be, no doubt, grief at her separation from him and dread

of his asserting his rights over Ada.

Lord Byron, kind and impressionable as he was, may have been moved at

this; but assuredly his resolution of not being reunited to Lady Byron

was not shaken. His only reply was to show me a letter he had written

some little time before:--

"The letter I inclose," said he, "may help to explain my sentiments....

I was perfectly sincere when I wrote it, and am so still. But it is

difficult for me to withstand the thousand provocations on that subject,

which both friends and foes have for seven years been throwing in the

way of a man whose feelings were once quick, and whose temper was never

patient. But 'returning were as tedious as go o'er.' I feel this as much

as ever Macbeth did; and it is a dreary sensation, which at least

avenges the real or imaginary wrongs of one of the two unfortunate

persons whom it concerns."

Here is the letter he wrote from Pisa to Lady Byron:--

"I have to acknowledge the receipt of Ada's hair, which is very soft and

pretty, and nearly as dark already as mine was at twelve years old, if I

may judge from what I recollect of some in Augusta's possession, taken

at that age. But it don't curl, perhaps from its being let grow.

"I also thank you for the inscription of the date and name, and I will

tell you why: I believe that they are the only two or three words of

your handwriting in my possession. For your letters I returned, and

except the two words, or rather the one word, 'household,' written twice

in an old account-book, I have no other. I burnt your last note for two

reasons:--firstly, it was written in a style not very agreeable; and,

secondly, I wished to take your word without documents, which are the

worldly resources of suspicious people.

"I suppose that this note will reach you somewhere about Ada's

birthday--the 10th of December, I believe. She will then be six, so that

in about twelve more I shall have some chance of meeting her; perhaps

sooner, if I am obliged to go to England by business or otherwise.

Recollect, however, one thing, either in distance or nearness: every day

which keeps us asunder should, after so long a period, rather soften our

mutual feelings, which must always have one rallying-point as long as

our child exists, which I presume we both hope will be long after either

of her parents.

"The time which has elapsed since the separation has been considerably

more than the whole brief period of our union, and the not much longer

one of our prior acquaintance. We both made a bitter mistake; but now it

is over, and irrevocably so. For at thirty-three on my part, and a few

years less on yours, though it is no very extended period of life, still

it is one when the habits and thoughts are generally so formed as to

admit of no modification; and as we could not agree when younger, we

should with difficulty do so now.

"I say all this, because I own to you that, notwithstanding every thing,

I considered our reunion as not impossible for more than a year after

the separation; but then I gave up the hope entirely and forever. But

this very impossibility of reunion seems to me, at least, a reason why,

on all the few points of discussion which can arise between us, we

should preserve the courtesies of life, and as much of its kindness as

people who are never to meet may preserve, perhaps more easily than

nearer connections. For my own part, I am violent, but not malignant;

for only fresh provocations can awaken my resentment. To you, who are

colder and more concentrated, I would just hint that you may sometimes

mistake the depth of a cold anger for dignity, and a worse feeling for

duty. I assure you that I bear you now (whatever I may have done) no

resentment whatever. Remember that if you have injured me in aught, this

forgiveness is something; and that if I have injured you, it is

something more still, if it be true, as moralists say, that the most

offending are the least forgiving.

"Whether the offense has been solely on my side or reciprocal, or on

yours chiefly, I have ceased to reflect upon any but two things, viz.,

that you are the mother of my child, and that we shall never meet again.

I think if you also consider the two corresponding points with reference

to myself, it will be better for all three. Yours ever,

"NOEL BYRON."

This letter, though never sent, requires no further proofs. It can now

be understood, although the contrary has been said, that Lord Byron's

resolution never again to unite with Lady Byron was irrevocable; but

that, however, a reconciliation would have pleased him, on account of

his daughter, and because no feeling of hatred could find room in his

great _soul_.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 138: "In none of the persons he admired," says Moore, "did I

meet with a union of qualities so well fitted to succeed in the

difficult task of winning him into fidelity and happiness as in the lady

in question. Combining beauty of the highest order with a mind

intelligent and ingenuous, having just learning enough to give

refinement to her taste, and far too much taste to make pretensions to

learning; with a patrician spirit proud as Lord Byron's, but showing it

only in a delicate generosity of spirit, a feminine high-mindedness,

which would have led her to tolerate the defects of her husband in

consideration of his noble qualities and his glory, and even to

sacrifice silently her own happiness rather than violate the

responsibility in which she stood pledged to the world for his."]

[Footnote 139: This circumstance was his proposal for Miss Milbank; we

shall see presently how it had taken place.]

[Footnote 140: "Lady Byron," said Lord Byron at Pisa, "and Mr. Medwin

were continually making portraits of me; each one more unlike than the

other."]

[Footnote 141: Moore, Letter 233.]

[Footnote 142: At this time of embarrassment he borrowed a large sum to

give to Coleridge.]

[Footnote 143: Moore, p. 389.]

[Footnote 144: Moore's Life, vol. iii. p. 209.]

[Footnote 145: It is true that once Lord Byron discharged a pistol, by

accident, in Lady Byron's room, when she was _enciente_. This action,

coupled with the preoccupations and sadness overwhelming Lord Byron's

mind at this time, and further aided by the insinuation of Mrs.

Claremont, made Lady Byron begin and continue to suspect that he was

mad, and so fully did she believe it, that from that hour, she could

never see him come near her without trembling. It was under the

influence of this absurd idea that she left him. Lady Byron was not

guilty of the reports then current against him. They were spread abroad

by her parents: she, on the contrary, as long as she thought him mad,

felt great sorrow at it. It was only when she had to persuade herself

that he was not mad, that she vowed hatred against him, convinced as she

was that he had only married her out of revenge, and not from love. But

if an imaginary fear, and even an unreasonable jealousy may be her

excuse (just as one excuses a monomania), can one equally forgive her

silence? Such a silence is morally what are physically the poisons which

kill at once, and defy all remedies, thus insuring the culprit's safety.

This silence it is which will ever be her crime, for by it she poisoned

the life of her husband.]

[Footnote 146: All this is either _false_ or _exaggerated_. Religious

criticisms were not so mild, though he had not in any way _attacked

religion_, and the Tories _never forgave_ his attack on the prince

regent, which they made a great noise about.]

[Footnote 147: See the description of her life made by him to Medwin

during his stay at Pisa.]

[Footnote 148: Lord Byron, in lines wrung from him by anguish and anger,

says _the moral Clytemnestra of thy lord_.]

My Recollections of Lord Byron · 第 23 / 27 章