John Kulamer was born on May 3, 1876, at Spisske Podhradie, Spisska

Zupa, Czecho-Slovak Republic, and came to this country in 1891,

alone. In June, 1909, he was admitted to the bar in Allegheny County,

Pennsylvania.

In an article, entitled “Americanization: the Other Side of the

Case,” contributed to the _Atlantic Monthly_, March, 1920, he says:

“Although born in far-off Czecho-Slovakia, under the shadow of the

snow-capped Tatra, I can without boasting say that I yield to no one

in my loyalty to the Stars and Stripes; and if I differ in my views

as to the methods to be used in Americanizing those who, like me,

were born in other countries, I do it out of love for my adopted

country, and because I am anxious to see these efforts crowned with

success.”

Mr. Kulamer has favored us with the following essay, in which he

further presents his ideas on this subject.

THE AMERICAN SPIRIT AND AMERICANIZATION

No matter how uncouth in appearance the immigrant when he sets foot

on American soil, the criminal fleeing from the hands of justice

excepted, there burns in his soul an intense love for the country of

his nativity, inherited from generations of his ancestors; the more

primitive his heart, the simpler and stronger is this love. He may have

come to this country only to earn sufficient money to relieve his wants

at home or to enlarge his means of living, or he may have come here as

to a land of promise of whose great opportunities and larger freedom he

has heard, still his heart remains in the land of his birth where the

ashes of his forefathers are resting and to which the memories of his

happiest childhood days are clinging. Leaving his home-nest, forsaking

friends and family and turning his face to a strange land to mix with

people whose customs and language he knows not, is a thrilling and

tragic adventure to every immigrant. And it is well that his soul is so

constituted, because he has the capacity to become a true patriot. Your

cosmopolite is of different stuff; he is callous and incapable of those

noble sentiments which urge the patriot to sacrifice even his life for

his country, either of birth or adoption. A man who pays no homage to

any land is incapable of harboring those feelings of brotherly love and

kinship on which the solidarity of a nation rests. If Americanizers

wish to wean the immigrant from the old to the new, they must have

genuine respect for his feelings and not wound them; he must be wooed,

he cannot be forced.

What is the object of this Americanization which is so much talked

about and on which so much energy and money is spent? Is it simply to

wipe out the difference between the customs and habits of the older

and newer settlers; or is it to amalgamate the various human elements

into one homogeneous mass, into one nation? If it is the former, it is

wasted energy; time will accomplish it. If it is the latter, then the

aliens must be considered as human beings whose souls are made of the

same material as those of the Pilgrim Fathers. Nations do not appear

on the earth spontaneously; they are the result of historical growth,

lasting for centuries. Many factors exert their influences upon a

nation in the formative stage. Stop immigration, if you can get along

without it, and in another generation the inhabitants of this country

will be such Americans as America will have made them. If they should

not turn out to be true Americans, it will be America’s fault. Even now

the children of alien parents speak the same language, dress the same

way, dance the same dances, sing the same songs, have the same good

qualities and the same faults as the children whose ancestors came here

sooner. If you want to convert the old folks into Americans, then it is

necessary to handle the situation with tact. Love is a tender plant;

it does not take root easily, and the least inclement weather will

blast it; but it is very sturdy when full grown, nothing less than a

thunderbolt will shatter it. Furthermore, it is of a spiritual essence,

and money cannot buy it.

To succeed in this purpose it is, first of all, necessary to study each

nationality separately. The very fact that all of them are treated

alike is detrimental. It is unfair to class them all alike. They

all have their good and bad qualities; and justice demands that the

latter be not attributed to those who do not possess them. There is

not one nationality that would admit its inferiority to the others,

and every one of them considers itself equal to, if not better than,

many others. Consequently, to be classed with races looked down upon

is a humiliation to which no one with self-respect will submit without

protest. This is a fact which must not be lost sight of; it is rooted

in human nature. It is further necessary to study the habits, customs,

prejudices and inclinations of every nationality separately, so that

such as are too deeply rooted may not be violently antagonized.

Take, for example, the matter of language. The Swede or the Spaniard

may not object to being forced by law to learn English, because in his

mother country this question never arose, it did not enter into his

daily life. It is different with the Slovak or the Pole, whose soul was

stirred to its very depths because the Magyar or the Prussian wanted

by law to force a strange tongue on him. It was a tradition with him

to resist such an attempt; he looked upon it as an oppression in his

mother country, and he is likely to look upon it in the same light

here. The conditions in Europe and here may be different; he may be

justified in objecting there and not here; but his mind is habituated

to opposing the ruling powers in their efforts to force upon him a

strange language. A common workingman is not used to psychological

self-analysis or to studying archæology; he is controlled mainly by his

impulses. He will note only that he is required to submit here to laws

which he considered oppressive and tyrannical in the old country.

The glories and advantages of this country should not be fed to the

immigrant in excessive doses, but presented tactfully. He is liable

to look upon it as an attempt to humiliate him, as unwarranted

boasting. It is not difficult to pick flaws in the armor of American

complacency. Every man is a hero-worshipper at heart, and every man

has his childhood heroes to whom he clings. Judged by an absolute

standard, if there is such a standard, the American heroes may stand

on a higher plane; but if rude hands are placed upon the childhood

heroes of the alien he is likely to resent it. The skies are just as

blue, the fields are carpeted just as beautifully with flowers and the

nights are illuminated with the same glorious stars on the Eastern as

on the Western Hemisphere. The majority of the aliens enjoyed more of

these beauties at home than they do in the mines and smoke-infested

atmosphere of the industrial American cities. It is true that they earn

more money here in dollars and cents; but they work harder for it and

sometimes under the most cruel taskmasters.

Teaching aliens the English language, American customs, ideals,

political institutions and history, will, of course, go a great way

in making them formal Americans, and, in some cases, it may awaken

in them a love for their new home; but it is indispensably necessary

that in their daily contact with the older Americans they see that

these ideals are put into practice. They have a very high idea of

Americanism, and they scrutinize very critically the conduct of the

Americans with whom they come into contact, to see whether it squares

with these ideals. They watch the manner in which the laws are enforced

by the officials, and compare it with the way in which they are

enforced in their native land; and, if they find out that the Americans

do not practice what they preach, that the administration of public

affairs is not essentially different here from what they know it to

be at home, their opinion of America is not exalted. They look upon

all the loud protestations as bluff and hypocrisy, and no amount of

Americanization work will change their views. They are on trial here,

but they also put the Americans to a test.

This Americanization work must be looked upon as the molding of human

souls. When men’s habits of thought and action have become fixed by

age, when they have lost their youthful plasticity, to recast their

souls into predetermined molds without subjecting them first to the

gentle heat of sympathy is like forging cold steel into new shapes. It

can be done, but it requires enormous energy and the results are never

as satisfactory as when the steel is first heated into a flux and then

cast.

If Americanization is to accomplish its purpose,--the amalgamation of

all the races and nationalities that inhabit the United States into one

nation, the transformation of the aliens into one hundred per cent.

Americans,--if it is to be beneficial and not harmful, it must be

looked upon as a spiritual regeneration. Naturalization makes a citizen

out of an alien; learning the English language makes him more efficient

both for good and evil; conformity to American habits and customs wipes

out social differences; knowledge of American institutions and laws

enables him to live up to them or to break them consciously; but none

of these nor all combined will make him an enthusiastic American unless

his heart has been alienated from his mother country and his affections

transferred to his adopted home. Not until the alien will love America

above all, not until he will boast of it and defend its faults, can he

be considered a true American. And he will do neither unless he has

placed America above his mother country in his estimation. This means a

re-birth in his soul.

ENRICO C. SARTORIO

“The Social and Religious Life of Italians in America,” by Enrico

C. Sartorio, is written from the viewpoint of one who came as a

foreigner to America when he was already a young man. It aims to show

how a foreigner really feels. In the words of Dean George Hodges,

who writes the Introduction to the book, it “is a timely revelation

of the width and depth of a racial gulf which must first be bridged

and then filled. His suggestions as to the accomplishing of this

necessary work are definite and practical inferences from his own

successful experience.”

Mr. Sartorio studied at the Cambridge Episcopal Theological School

and has since been successfully engaged in pastoral work in the city

of Boston.

PATRONIZING THE FOREIGNER

Among certain people there still exists the old prejudice that there

must be something the matter with a foreigner. Exclusiveness on one

side, loneliness on the other, do not help to interpret American life

in the right spirit to the foreigner. If educated Italians thus do not

know the real America, you can easily imagine what the immigrant’s

conception of America may be. My barber, who has been in this country

twenty-eight years, was dumbfounded when I told him the other day that

six people out of seven in America are Protestant. The poor fellow had

gone about for twenty-eight years tipping his hat to every church,

thinking that they were all Roman Catholic churches. I have found over

and over again Italian couples living together in the belief that

they were husband and wife, because they misunderstood American law.

They had been told that in America a civil marriage was as valid as a

religious one, so they went to the City Hall, and by going through the

process of answering questions in taking out the marriage license, they

thought they had been married and went happily home to live together

as husband and wife. An Italian tried to explain to me the meaning

of Thanksgiving Day. “You see,” he said, “the word explains itself,

‘Tacchins-giving Day’”; “tacchin” meaning turkey in Italian, it was,

according to this man, the day on which Americans gave away turkeys.

And what opportunity has an immigrant to know this country when he sees

America only at its worst? Through the gum-chewing girls whom he meets

in factories, through the hard-drinking and hard-swearing “boss” who

orders him about, through the dubious type of youth whom he meets at

the saloon and in the dance hall, through the descriptions given in

Italian newspapers and by cheap orators he comes to know America. Add

to that poor wages, quarters in the slums, policemen, car conductors

and ushers who laugh at him when he asks for information, “bosses” who

claim a fee for securing him a job, and the sweet names of “Dago” and

“Guinea” by which the supposed American thinks himself entitled to call

him, and you can imagine what a delightful feeling the average Italian

has toward this country.

Where does the fault lie? In prejudice and indifference, and in the

spirit of patronage. Americans who judge by appearances, who have not

travelled in Italy or studied modern Italian life, scornfully turn

away from the Italian immigrant because he is not as clean-shaven

or as well-kempt as the American workingman. Other Americans do not

concern themselves with foreigners. They have a vague knowledge that

there is somewhere, in some God-forsaken corner of the city, a foreign

population, and that is all. Still others take a sentimental view of

the matter; they have somewhat the feeling that existed in the bosom of

an Irishwoman, a neighbor of mine. On Saturday night,--she was always

affectionate on that special night,--she would wipe her eyes and say,

“Thim poor Eyetalians.” This kind of person means well, but generally

has zeal without knowledge.

A lady of refinement, born in a leading city of Italy, married to an

Italian Protestant minister who is now at the head of an important

religious movement in Italy, one day received the following letter:--

“_Dear Madam_:

“We are going to have a bazaar for the benefit of Italians. Please

come to help us, _dressed in the national costume that you used to

wear in Italy_.”

A son of a leading lawyer of Naples came to this country and was soon

holding a fine position and making a good living. He met at church an

American lady, who told him that she would be very glad to see him

the next day at her house. At the appointed hour our young gentleman

went there and handed his card to the servant. “Oh, yes,” she said,

“the lady gave me something for you,” and she thrust into his hand a

dilapidated suitcase and a note. The note read:--

“_Dear Sir_:

“I have been called away suddenly, but my maid will give you the

article which I intended to present to you in asking you to call. As

I no longer have use for this suitcase, perhaps it would serve you on

your next trip to Italy.

“Trusting to see you at church next Sunday,

“Sincerely yours,

---- ----.”

On another occasion an Italian minister was sent to a new field. A few

days after he had settled down he had a telephone call from the wife

of a minister of the town, who invited him to call at her house. At

the appointed hour he went and was met by the servant, who gave him a

newspaper bundle. The young man protested, saying that he had come to

call in response to an invitation. The servant went upstairs, but came

back, saying there was no mistake, that the lady wished that given to

him. On reaching home he found that the contents consisted of cast-off

clothing for his children. He bought a handsome edition of an Italian

book for children, translated into English, and sent it with his

regards to the patronizing lady.

TRAINING FOR CITIZENSHIP

There should be, in the large foreign colonies, organized lectures,

clubs, stereopticon lectures, distribution of information, both in

Italian and in English, to explain and to instruct in regard to

American history, laws, institutions, and ideals. There should be

free courses on a university extension plan for Italian professional

men, with a view to preparing them to expound to their people in the

right way the principles and standards of American life. A regular

and carefully carried out campaign should be started in the Italian

newspapers, with well-written articles by leading men on the subject of

American life; and a careful censorship of Italian newspapers should be

established to challenge every article that is unduly depreciatory of

America.

Churches should be centres where American volunteers of the best

kind can in deed and word represent their country to the foreigner.

Churches furnish a good means to bring about Americanization. Italians

are apt to move from place to place, and those who become attached

to Evangelical churches, besides the good which they eventually get

in their own churches, are also brought into contact with American

congregations, who by their example initiate them into the ways of

American life.

A campaign to enlighten the immigrant as to his duties towards his new

country should be started on a somewhat different basis from those

already tried. The immigrant is often made to feel how great the

material advantage is for him in becoming an American citizen, and

thus is trained to enter into American public and political life in a

mercenary spirit. When I applied for citizenship papers, I received

this letter from the Bureau of Naturalization, Washington, D.C.:--

“_Dear Sir_:

“You have just filed your petition for naturalization to become a

citizen of the United States, and because of this the United States

Bureau of Naturalization is sending this letter to you, as it desires

to show you how you can become an American citizen. It also wants to

help you to get a better position that pays you more money for your

work. In order to help you better yourself it has sent your name to

the public schools in your city, and the superintendent of those

schools has promised to teach you the things which you should know

to help you to get a better position. If you will go to the public

school building nearest where you live the teacher will tell you what

nights you can go to school and the best school for you to go to.

You will not be put in a class with boys and girls, but with grown

people. It will not cost you anything for the teaching which you will

receive in the school, and it will help you get a better job and also

make you able to pass the examination in court when you come to get

your citizen’s papers.

“You should call at the schoolhouse as soon as you receive this

letter so that you may start to learn and be able to get a better job

as soon as possible.

“Very truly yours,

N. N.”

As you see, four times there occurs in this letter the exhortation

to become a citizen and to learn the English language in order to

get “a better job.” The letter contains not a single appeal to

higher motives nor a reference to the duties and responsibilities of

American citizenship, yet it is sent to every foreigner who applies

for citizenship. I think a letter of this kind is demoralizing. I

wonder whether America is better off for exhorting foreigners to become

citizens from such motives, or whether it would not be more desirable

to instruct immigrants carefully on the altruistic side as to the duty

of sharing the responsibilities of American life.

It may be worth mentioning that thirty years of residence in the city

of Rome is required of any man, even of Italian birth, in order to

become a Roman citizen.

Human nature, fortunately, is always longing for an appeal to its best

side. I accompanied a friend when the American citizenship was granted

to him. The judge, a man with a fine, clean-cut face, turned toward the

candidates--there were about a hundred in the room--and told the story

of the Pilgrim Fathers who, although starved and in great distress,

refused the opportunity of going back to England, where religious and

political freedom was denied them. The words were to me an inspiration,

and in glancing around I saw the faces of those present light up and

show signs of emotion. Big Irishmen, heavy-faced Slavs, small, dried-up

Jews, dark Italians, small-headed Greeks, I could see in the eyes of

them all the light of men who were seeing a vision. The appeal to

the best there is in man should be the leading thought in educating

immigrants to a desire for American citizenship.

OTTO HERMANN KAHN

Otto H. Kahn was born at Mannheim, Germany, February 21, 1867. His

father had emigrated to the United States in 1848, where he became a

naturalized citizen, returning to Germany ten years later. The son

was educated in Germany and served one year in the German army. He

then learned banking, and for five years was with the London branch

of the Deutsche Bank. In 1893 he came to the United States, where he

became connected with the banking house of Speyer & Co., and later

with the firm of Kuhn, Loeb & Co.

During the Great War Mr. Kahn delivered several patriotic speeches

which were collected under the title, “Right Above Race.”

The following excerpt is part of an address given at Carnegie

Institute, Pittsburgh, April 24, 1919.

CAPITAL AND LABOR--A FAIR DEAL

We have often heard it said recently--it has become rather the fashion

to say it--that the rulership of the world will henceforth belong to

labor. I yield to no one in my respect and sympathy for labor, or in my

cordial and sincere support of its just claims. The structure of our

institutions cannot stand unless the masses of workmen, farmers, indeed

all large strata of society, feel that under and by these institutions

they are being given a square deal within the limits, not of Utopia,

but of what is sane, right and practicable.

But the rulership of the world will and ought to belong to no one

class. It will and ought to belong neither to labor nor to capital,

nor to any other class. It will, of right and in fact, belong to

those of all classes who acquire title to it by talent, hard work,

self-discipline, character and service.

He is no genuine friend or sound counselor of the people nor a

true patriot who recklessly, calculatingly or ignorantly raises or

encourages expectations which cannot or which ought not to be fulfilled.

We must deal with all these things with common sense, mutual trust,

with respect for all, and with the aim of guiding our conduct by the

standard of liberty, justice and human sympathy. But we must rightly

understand liberty. We must resolutely oppose those who in their

impatient grasping for unattainable perfection would make of liberty a

raging and destructive torrent instead of a majestic and fertilizing

stream.

Liberty is not fool-proof. For its beneficent working it demands

self-restraint, a sane and clear recognition of the reality of things,

of the practicable and attainable, and a realization of the fact that

there are laws of nature and of economies which are immutable and

beyond our power to change.

Nothing in history is more pathetic than the record of the instances

when one or the other of the peoples of the world rejoicingly followed

a new lead which it was promised and fondly believed would bring it to

freedom and happiness, and then suddenly found itself, instead, on the

old and only too well-trodden lane which goes through suffering and

turmoil to disillusionment and reaction.

I suppose most of us when we were twenty knew of a short cut to the

millennium, and were impatient, resentful and rather contemptuous of

those whose fossilized prejudices or selfishness, as we regarded them,

prevented that short cut from becoming the high road of humanity.

Now that we are older, though we know that our eyes will not behold the

millennium, we should still like the nearest possible approach to it;

but we have learned that no short cut leads there, and that anybody who

claims to have found one is either an impostor or self-deceived.

Among those wandering signposts to Utopia we find and recognize certain

recurrent types:--

There are those who, in the fervor of their world-improving mission,

discover and proclaim certain cure-alls for the ills of humanity, which

they fondly and honestly believe to be new and unfailing remedies, but

which, as a matter of fact, are hoary with age, having been tried on

this old globe of ours at one time or another, in one of its parts or

another, long ago,--tried and found wanting and discarded after sad

disillusionment.

The American Spirit in the Writings of Americans of Foreign Birth · 第 9 / 12 段