CHAPTER XII

THE AMERICAN MIGRATION

From the first the problem of governing the settlements

above Montreal perplexed the authorities. It was very

early proposed to erect them into a separate province,

as New Brunswick had been erected into a separate province.

But Lord Dorchester was opposed to any such arrangement.

'It appears to me,' he wrote to Lord Sydney, 'that the

western settlements are as yet unprepared for any

organization superior to that of a county.' In 1787,

therefore, the country west of Montreal was divided into

four districts, for a time named Lunenburg, Mecklenburg,

Nassau, and Hesse. Lunenburg stretched from the western

boundary of the province of Quebec to the Gananoqui;

Mecklenburg, from the Gananoqui to the Trent, flowing

into the Bay of Quinte; Nassau, from the Trent to a line

drawn due north from Long Point on Lake Erie; and Hesse,

from this line to Detroit. We do not know who was

responsible for inflicting these names on a new and

unoffending country. Perhaps they were thought a compliment

to the Hanoverian ruler of England. Fortunately they were

soon dropped, and the names Eastern, Midland, Home, and

Western were substituted.

This division of the settlements proved only temporary.

It left the Loyalists under the arbitrary system of

government set up in Quebec by the Quebec Act of 1774,

under which they enjoyed no representative institutions

whatever. It was not long before petitions began to pour

in from them asking that they should be granted a

representative assembly. Undoubtedly Lord Dorchester had

underestimated the desire among them for representative

institutions. In 1791, therefore, the country west of

the Ottawa river, with the exception of a triangle of

land at the junction of the Ottawa and the St Lawrence,

was erected by the Constitutional Act into a separate

province, with the name of Upper Canada; and this province

was granted a representative assembly of fifteen members.

The lieutenant-governor appointed for the new province

was Colonel John Graves Simcoe. During the war Colonel

Simcoe had been the commanding officer of the Queen's

Rangers, which had been largely composed of Loyalists,

and he was therefore not unfitted to govern the new

province. He was theoretically under the control of Lord

Dorchester at Quebec; but his relations with Dorchester

were somewhat strained, and he succeeded in making himself

virtually independent in his western jurisdiction. Though

he seemed phlegmatic, he possessed a vigorous and

enterprising disposition, and he planned great things

for Upper Canada. He explored the country in search of

the best site for a capital; and it is interesting to

know that he had such faith in the future of Upper Canada

that he actually contemplated placing the capital in what

was then the virgin wilderness about the river Thames.

He inaugurated a policy of building roads and improving

communications which showed great foresight; and he

entered upon an immigration propaganda, by means of

proclamations advertising free land grants, which brought

a great increase of population to the province.

Simcoe believed that there were still in the United States

after 1791 many people who had remained loyal at heart

to Great Britain, and who were profoundly dissatisfied

with their lot under the new American government. It was

his object to attract these people to Upper Canada by

means of his proclamations; and there is no doubt that

he was partly successful. But he also attracted many who

had no other motive in coming to Canada than their desire

to obtain free land grants, and whose attachment to the

British crown was of the most recent origin. These people

were freely branded by the original settlers as 'Americans';

and there is no doubt that in many cases the name expressed

their real sympathies.

The War of the Revolution had hardly been brought to a

conclusion when some of the Americans showed a tendency

to migrate into Canada. In 1783, when the American Colonel

Willet was attempting an attack on the British garrison

at Oswego, American traders, with an impudence which was

superb, were arriving at Niagara. In 1784 some rebels

who had attempted to pose as Loyalists were ejected from

the settlements at Cataraqui. And after Simcoe began to

advertise free land grants to all who would take the oath

of allegiance to King George, hundreds of Americans

flocked across the border. The Duc de la Rochefoucauld,

a French _emigre_ who travelled through Upper Canada in

1795, and who has given us the best account of the province

at that time, asserted that there were in Upper Canada

many who falsely profess an attachment to the British

monarch and curse the Government of the Union for the

mere purpose of getting possession of the lands.' 'We

met in this excursion,' says La Rochefoucauld in another

place, 'an American family who, with some oxen, cows,

and sheep, were emigrating to Canada. "We come," said

they, "to the governor," whom they did not know, "to see

whether he will give us land." "Aye, aye," the governor

replied, "you are tired of the federal government; you

like not any longer to have so many kings; you wish again

for your old father" (it is thus the governor calls the

British monarch when he speaks with Americans); "you are

perfectly right; come along, we love such good Royalists

as you are; we will give you land."'

Other testimony is not lacking. Writing in 1799 Richard

Cartwright said, 'It has so happened that a great portion

of the population of that part of the province which

extends from the head of the Bay of Kenty upwards is

composed of persons who have evidently no claim to the

appellation of Loyalists.' In some districts it was a

cause of grievance that persons from the States entered

the province, petitioned for lands, took the necessary

oaths, and, having obtained possession of the land, resold

it, pocketed the money, and returned to build up the

American Union. As late as 1816 a letter appeared in the

Kingston _Gazette_ in which the complaint is made that

'people who have come into the country from the States,

marry into a family, and obtain a lot of wild land, get

John Ryder to move the landmarks, and instead of a wild

lot, take by force a fine house and barn and orchard,

and a well-cultivated farm, and turn the old Tory (as he

is called) out of his house, and all his labor for thirty

years.'

Never at any other time perhaps have conditions been so

favourable in Canada for land-grabbing and land-speculation

as they were then. Owing to the large amount of land

granted to absentee owners, and to the policy of free

land grants announced by Simcoe, land was sold at a very

low price. In some cases two hundred acre lots were sold

for a gallon of rum. In 1791 Sir William Pullency, an

English speculator, bought 1,500,000 acres of land in

Upper Canada at one shilling an acre, and sold 700,000

acres later for an average of eight shillings an acre.

Under these circumstances it was not surprising that many

Americans, with their shrewd business instincts, flocked

into the country.

It is clear, then, that a large part of the immigration

which took place under Simcoe was not Loyalist in its

character. From this, it must not be understood that the

new-comers were not good settlers. Even Richard Cartwright

confessed that they had 'resources in themselves which

other people are usually strangers to.' They compared

very favourably with the Loyalists who came from England

and the Maritime Provinces, who were described by Cartwright

as 'idle and profligate.' The great majority of the

American settlers became loyal subjects of the British

crown; and it was only when the American army invaded

Canada in 1812, and when William Lyon Mackenzie made a

push for independence in 1837, that the non-Loyalist

character of some of the early immigration became apparent.

The United Empire Loyalists: A Chronicle of the Great Migration [1914 ed.] · 第 12 / 13 章