CHAPTER XXIV.

CRITICAL NOTES.--+5. A man of knowledge,+ rather _"a man of

understanding,"_ +increaseth strength,+ literally _"maketh power

strong."_ Miller translates the entire verse thus:--_"A strong man,

if wise, is as a power indeed; and a man of knowledge makes strength

really strong."_ +7. Wisdom is too high,+ etc. Delitzsch here reads,

_Wisdom seems to the fool to be an ornamental commodity,_ and thinks

"the comparison lies in the rarity, costliness, and unattainableness

of wisdom." "The word," says Miller, "occurs but three times in the

Bible; once in Job xxviii. 18, translated _coral;_ once in Ezekiel

xxvii. 16, translated _coral_ and agate; and once in this passage,

where it ought to be translated _coral_ again." Some, from this

rendering, understand the verse to signify that a fool uses wisdom

like a precious stone, only for ornament. +8. Mischievous person,+

literally _a master or lord of mischief._ +9. The thought,+ etc.,

rather, "the _device_ or _undertaking._" +10. If thou faint,+ etc.,

rather _"If thou hast been straitened in the day of straitness,

strait is thy strength."_ +11.+ Literally, _"Deliver them who are

dragged forth_ unto _death, and them that totter to the slaughter,

oh, rescue them."_ +12. He that pondereth,+ literally, _the Weigher

of hearts._ +He that keepeth,+ rather _"watcheth."_ +14. There shall

be a reward,+ rather, _"there is a future,"_ as in chap. xxiii. 18.

+16. The wicked shall fall.+ Delitzsch reads, _"the wicked are

overthrown when calamity falls on them," i.e.,_ they do not rise

again and again as the just man does. +20. Reward.+ The same word

used in verse 14, and in chap. xxiii. 18. Its literal meaning is "a

hereafter." Zöckler translates it _end_ in the first two instances,

but in this case he reads _future._ Delitzsch and Miller render it

_hereafter_ or _future_ in every verse. +21. Given to change,+

literally _otherwise disposed,_ or, according to Miller, _repeaters,

turners back._ +22. The ruin of them both,+ etc. This phrase is

variously rendered, and different meanings are also attached to the

same rendering. Delitzsch follows the Syriac version, and reads,

_"the end of their years, who knoweth it?"_ But Zöckler adapts the

reading of the Authorised Version, which is supported by the Vulgate,

by Luther, Ewald, Elster, and others. Some understand the word _both_

to refer to those who rebel against God, and those who rebel against

the king (so Zöckler), while others apply it to God and the king, and

the _ruin_ foretold as that proceeding from them. Here begins a short

appendix to the third main division of the book of Proverbs, the

first clause of verse 33 being its superscription, which is almost in

the same words as that which introduces the division itself. (See

chap. xxii. 17.) It extends only to the end of the chapter, and

consists of maxims which have no apparent connection with each other.

+23. These things also belong to the wise.+ Rather _"These_ (the

proverbs which follow) _are also from wise men."_ The word _also_

connects this introduction with that in chap. xxii. 17. +25. To them

that rebuke,+ etc. The word _him_ is not in the original, and spoils

the sense. If this rendering of the verb is accepted, _iniquity_ must

be understood to be the subject of rebuke. Delitzsch however reads,

_"To them who rightly decide,"_ and Miller renders, _"To them that

set the thing right."_ +26. A right answer,+ _i.e._, a _faithful,

straightforward_ answer. "The word comes," says Miller, "from a verb

meaning _to be in front._" "The mention of the _lips,_" Zöckler

remarks, "is to be explained simply by the remembrance of the

_question_ to which the upright and truthful answer corresponds."

+27. House.+ This word may mean here as it does in Exod. i. 21, Ruth

iv. 11, 2 Sam. vii. 27, etc., the family--the household interests.

_MAIN HOMILETICS OF THE PARAGRAPH.--Verses_ 1-6.

HOUSE BUILDING.

+I. An undertaking founded upon wickedness lacks the first element of

stability.+ A house built upon a sandy foundation, we all know, does

not possess the first requisite of safety. It is useless to erect any

building for fine weather purposes only--if it is not able to stand a

storm all the labour expended upon it is lost. Those places are very

few where the tempest does not come sometimes, and even if we could

find so favoured a spot, a sandy foundation would not be a permanent

one. The ordinary play of the elements and the changes of the seasons

would be ever at work upon the loose and shifting soil, and in time

the house must fall. So it is with any work undertaken with an evil

purpose or from wicked motives. There are laws at work in God's

universe which will forbid such a building to remain long in

existence. It is very easy work to lay the stones in the sand--much

more easy than to hew out a place for them in the solid rock--and the

apparently rapid success of evil men and evil deeds tempts many an

unwise builder to work after their method. But the experience of the

Psalmist is repeated in every age and must be to the end of time: _"I

have seen the wicked in great power, and spreading himself like a

green bay tree. Yet he passed away, and, lo, he was not; yea, I

sought him, but he could not be found"_ (Psalm xxxvii. 35, 36).

+II. True wisdom consists in patient continuance in well-doing.+ In

this passage, as throughout the entire Book of Proverbs, wisdom is

set up as the rival of evil, and sin is accounted as the height of

folly. The wise man accounts everything foolishness which is against

the moral law of the universe, and the _good_ man in his estimation

the only _wise_ man. That this is a just and true estimate is

apparent to all who look a little beneath the surface of things--to

all who realise that it is one thing to _seem_ and another thing _to

be._ The mansion upon the sand-bank _appears_ to be a more desirable

dwelling place than the cottage upon the rock, but time will prove

which is the safer of the two. But permanence or safety are not the

only recommendations to the home of wisdom. There is a satisfaction

and a positive joy to be found in doing the right to which the

evil-doer is a stranger. To be on the right side of the good is to be

on the side of God and of conscience, to know from experience that

all the moral powers of the soul grow stronger with use, and such

experimental knowledge fills the chambers of the soul "with all

precious and pleasant riches" (verse 4). These considerations ought

to make it easy to obey Solomon's precept: "Be not envious against

evil men, neither desire to be with them." The mariner on even a

stormy sea would not envy the dweller in the lighthouse if he knew

that the waves were rapidly undermining its foundation and rendering

its speedy fall certain, and to envy a man a short-lived prosperity

which must have a sad end is as contrary to the dictates of reason

and self-love. A consideration of their "end" (Psalm lxxiii. 17) is a

good preservative against such an envy, and has been tried by many

men since the days of Asaph with the same success. But without

bringing the future into the present, envy of the wicked may be

effectually prevented if we can realise their present loss. The

inhabitant of the dwelling filled with materials to satisfy his

bodily and mental appetites and wants does not envy him whose house

is destitute of such comforts. Yet that would be more reasonable than

for him who has the opportunity of rearing for himself a

well-furnished house of wisdom--of building a character which shall

be in itself a source of satisfaction and joy to his better

nature--to desire the empty and unsatisfying portion of evil doers.

For Homiletics on verse 6 considered by itself see on chap. xi. 14,

page 214, and on chap. xx. 18, page 590.

_OUTLINES AND SUGGESTIVE COMMENTS._

Verse 1. Sin is like sound, and it finds the moral nature of fallen

man, like the atmosphere, a good conducting medium. The word or deed

of evil does not terminate where it is produced. It radiates all

round; and beside the direct propagation from a centre by diverging

lines, it further reduplicates itself by rebounding like an echo from

every object upon which it falls. Human beings may well stand in awe

when they consider the self-propagating power of sin, and the

facilities which their own corruption affords it. Different persons

are affected in different ways. One is shaken by the example of

wickedness in its first out-go, another by its rebounding blow. One

is carried away in the stream, another hurts himself by his violent

efforts to resist it. Some imitate the sin. Others fret against the

sinner. Both classes do evil and suffer injury. Whether you be

impatiently "envious against evil men," or weakly "desirous to be

with them," you have sustained damage by the contact.--_Arnot._

To be envious against evil men is plainly to confess ourselves to be

worse than they are. For, as St. Gregory speaketh, we cannot envy

except it be those who we think to be better than ourselves. Indeed,

to envy against evil men is to make wickedness to be goodness, and to

show no goodness to be in his heart that is so envious. . . .

Whosoever thou be that envieth evil men, I cannot tell who should

envy thee, except the devil, because thou strivest to be more wicked

than he is. For they are only the godly that he is envious

against.--_Jermin._

Verse 4. The last virtue here spoken of is knowledge, whereby the

inward rooms of the house are filled with all precious substance;

unto the providing and treasuring up of food, of money, and all

things necessary and comfortable, the knowledge of times, the prices

of things, and of the means whereby commodities may be obtained, is

requisite. . . . It is not to be marvelled at that many young married

folk and householders in these days have nothing in their families

but want of necessaries and bare walls, seeing they want both wisdom

and understanding, and knowledge.--_Muffett._

Riches imply (1) plenty of that which is precious and pleasant.

(2) Propriety. They must be that which is their own; and hereunto

economical prudence much conducteth. God bestoweth abundance on the

wicked _ex largitate,_ only out of a general providence; but upon his

people that are good husbands _ex promisso,_ by virtue of this and

the like promises.--_Trapp._

Verse 5. _A strong man._ (See Miller's rendering in the Critical

Notes.) A _common_ man, a _better sort_ of man, are the four words

for man in the Bible. This is a _strong man._ It means _strong_ in a

worldly sense. That man, _if wise, is a power indeed._ . . . The

meaning is that a _"strong"_ man, if not _"wise,"_ is not _"strong"_

at all; that piety is itself strength; that the stronger a man

without it, the weaker he is; that a strong man who is pious, not

only becomes strong in that, but strong really by his worldly

strength; because piety gives realness to every gift.--_Miller._

I. Intelligence _apart from_ piety is power. A man who has great

intelligence, and knows how to use it, possesses a power superior to

any physical force. . . . II. Piety _apart from_ intelligence is a

_higher kind_ of power. It is the patience of love, endurance,

patience, compassion; it is a power which will touch men's hearts,

move the very arm of Omnipotence, "take hold upon the strength of

God." III. Piety _associated with_ intelligence is the _highest

creature_ power. What power on earth is equal to that possessed by

the man of vast intelligence and consecrated affections, the man of

sunny intellect and Heaven-inspired sympathies and aims?--_Dr. David

Thomas._

A wise man is not only strong in having wisdom, but in getting

strength also. . . . For by wisdom knowing well the want and need of

strength, he is careful and diligent to procure it; whereas many

times strength, being presumptuous upon its own might, seeks not for

wisdom to support it, and falls for want of having it.--_Jermin._

_MAIN HOMILETICS OF VERSE_ 7.

A FALSE ESTIMATE AND A TRUE ONE.

+I. The fool's estimate of wisdom.+ Solomon here gives the fool's own

reason for remaining in his folly, viz., that wisdom is difficult to

acquire--that neither intellectual or spiritual knowledge can be

gained without pains and self-denial. This is of course saying in

effect that they are worthless, and this false estimate lies at the

root of all ignorance, whether it be mental or moral. For if we can

make a man feel that a thing is good and will bring him good, he will

not be unwilling to seek to possess it, and his search and his

pursuit will be diligent, and eager, and continuous, in proportion to

the good which he believes the possession will bring him. The idle

schoolboy complains of the difficulty of his tasks, and of the

severity of his teacher, because he does not rightly estimate the

value of knowledge, and the moral fool finds fault with the methods

of becoming spiritually wise, because he has no sense of the worth of

such wisdom. But it must not be forgotten that the longer the fool

makes the excuse of the text, the more true it becomes. The powers of

the intellect, like those of the body, are less capable of use the

longer they remain idle. If a healthy man is so indolent as to refuse

to walk, his legs by long disuse may become unable to perform their

office, and if the mental powers are left unexercised in youth, it is

more difficult to use them to purpose in middle life. And it is so,

too, with the spiritual perceptions and capabilities. Although it is

never too late to acquire the highest wisdom, it certainly seems more

out of the reach of the man who has neglected to seek it throughout a

long life, than of him who gives to its pursuit the vigour and

freshness of his youth.

+II. The consequent estimate which wise men form of the fool.+ If men

undervalue wisdom, they themselves are little valued, and their words

and opinions have no weight with wise men. As it is a mark of folly

generally to "open the mouth," although nothing comes therefrom that

is worth anything, the declaration that a fool "openeth not his mouth

in the gate" must point, not to his own modesty or conscious

inability to speak wisely, but to the estimation in which he is held

by others.

_OUTLINES AND SUGGESTIVE COMMENTS._

In bodily things, the more weighty they are, the lower they fall; the

lighter they are, the higher they go. Contrariwise is it in the

things of the soul, and the more weighty they are, the higher they

are; the lighter they are, the lower they lie. It is therefore the

lightness of a fool's brain that makes wisdom too high for him: the

giddiness of his head is not able to look up unto the height of

it. . . . Therefore St. Gregory saith, If thou wilt find wisdom,

tread upon the waves of this world, and walk upon the waters of this

life, as St. Peter did, and she will reach forth her right hand to

thee, as she did to Peter.--_Jermin._

Verses 8 and 9 treat of subjects which have occurred more than once

before. See on chap. vi. 12-19, page 81.

_MAIN HOMILETICS OF VERSE_ 10.

THE DAY OF ADVERSITY.

+I. The inevitable in human experience.+ The day of adversity is an

ordination of God, as a necessary element in man's moral training.

The human rulers of a well-ordered State make certain provisions for

the education of the young, and these provisions necessarily include

many things that are distasteful, and even painful, to the pupils.

But if they were left to map out their own course, and to arrange for

themselves the plan of their education, we well know that the result

in the end would be unsatisfactory to everybody, and most of all to

themselves when they were old enough to judge. Even so it is with

mankind and the Ruler of the world. God has purposed that men shall

be subject to such a course of instruction and discipline as shall at

least give them an opportunity of becoming wiser and better, and the

day of adversity is an indispensable element in such a training. It

therefore does not come to us by chance, nor is it always to be

regarded in the light of a penalty for special sin, but is a token of

Divine interest in our real welfare--an expression of Divine desire

for our moral growth. It is wise, then, for all to recognise the fact

that adversity in some form or other, at some period or other, is an

inevitable event in their human life.

+II. The test of human character.+ No man knows his moral strength

until he comes face to face with trial. The chain that holds the

vessel to the quay is only as strong as the weakest link, and if that

one gives way the vessel is loosed from her moorings as surely as if

every link was broken. So human character is only as strong as its

weakest point, and if a severe strain is brought to bear upon a man,

he will break down there. In the day of adversity every virtue and

excellence that we possess will be subjected to a severe test, and if

only one of them is found unequal to the trial, the whole character

suffers, and we are in danger of losing our hold upon God, and so

drifting from the right course. A man may have a high opinion of his

own physical strength, and fancy that he is well able to grapple with

any foe who might attack him. But it is not till he is in the grip of

his antagonist that he knows how much or how little he is able to do

and to bear. If he finds himself on the ground, stunned and bleeding,

he rises from the struggle with a lower estimate of his own muscular

strength than he had before. And so it is with the inner man when the

day of adversity over takes it--we think that our faith and moral

courage are equal to any emergency, but we are sometimes stricken

down to the dust and "faint" from the weight of a blow which we

thought beforehand we could withstand, and for the rest of our lives

have less confidence in our spiritual strength.

+III. A strengthener of human character.+ Although men often "faint"

in the day of adversity, or find their resources insufficient to meet

their needs in the hour of trial, it is not necessarily the case, nor

is it always so. Indeed, the intention of trial is not to take away

our strength, but to _increase_ it. If the day of adversity proves

too much for our strength, the encounter may leave us morally weaker

than we were before; but if we bear it courageously, and do not allow

it to drive us to despair, or even to doubt, we come out of the

ordeal stronger than when we entered into it. If a tree has too firm

a hold upon the soil to be uprooted by the tempest, the shaking will

but make it firmer still, and if our confidence and hope in God are

not lessened by the blasts of adversity, they are rendered stronger

and brighter, and more fitted to encounter the next storm. But

fainting at the first blow of adversity leaves very little strength

to meet the next trial, and this thought seems also to be in the

proverb as it stands in the Hebrew.

_OUTLINES AND SUGGESTIVE COMMENTS._

If you were to hear some men's experience you would think they grew

as the white pine grows, with straight grain and easily split, for I

notice that all that grow easy split easy. But there are some that

grow as the mahogany grows, with veneering knots, with all the quirls

and contortions of grain; that is the best timber of the forest which

has the most knots. . . . There are many who are content to grow

straight, like weeds on a dunghill; but there are many others who

want to be stalwart and strong like the monarchs of the forest, and

yet when God sends the winds of adversity to sing a lullaby in their

branches, they do not like to grow in that way. They dread the

culture that is really giving toughness to their soul and strength to

its fibre.--_Beecher._

The times of man's distress, though it be a night of sorrow and

trouble, which it bringeth to the soul, yet is it a day also, because

it showeth truly to the soul what a man is.--_Jermin._

_MAIN HOMILETICS OF VERSES_ 11 _and_ 12.

POSITIVE PUNISHMENT FOR A NEGATIVE CRIME.

+I. The negative crime.+ The question "Am I my brother's keeper?" is

here answered with an emphatic affirmative, for whatever may be the

special reference of the words it is plain that they condemn as

criminal the non-interposition of the strong on behalf of the weak

and distressed. This crime may be committed from various causes.

Those who are guilty of it may be entirely indifferent to the

sufferings of others. There are many men and women who, if they are

at ease themselves, never concern themselves about the sufferings of

others--it matters not to them who is hungry so as they are well fed,

and what privations others may be enduring while their needs are

supplied. But the crime is oftener chargeable to moral cowardice and

unwillingness to practice self-denial. A man may be sufficiently

concerned for the danger of a drowning brother to throw him a rope,

but he may shrink from throwing himself into the water and risking a

watery grave on his behalf. So he may pity the ignorant and the

erring and feel sad when he thinks of their sorrows and their sins,

and yet be unwilling to sacrifice his money or his leisure or his

social position in endeavours to save them. But the proverb seems to

deal especially with what seems at first sight to be a less

blameworthy class of persons than either of these--with those who

have never considered the claims which others have upon them--who are

really ignorant how many hearts are breaking around them and how many

are perishing for the want of a helping hand. But this ignorance is

here regarded as criminal. "Evil is wrought for want of thought, as

well as want of heart," but it is as much evil in the one case as in

the other, and the want of thought is a sin in itself. And so is the

want of knowledge here. God will not admit the plea "I knew it not,"

but holds him who utters it guilty for his ignorance as well as for

his neglect.

+II. The positive punishment.+ No truth is taught more plainly in the

Bible, than that men will not escape retribution of some kind because

they have simply abstained from doing ill. The possessor of the one

talent did not put it to a bad use, or throw it away. He kept it

carefully wrapped in a napkin. But the sentence passed upon him was

not merely that he should be deprived of his privilege, or that

reward should be withheld, but:--_"Cast ye the unprofitable servant

into outer darkness"_ (Matt. xxv. 30). "The tree that was only barren

was burned," says an old writer. The justice of this will be seen the

more we consider how much actual _wrong-doing_ on the part of some is

chargeable to the _not-doing_ of others. How much sin might be

prevented if those who have it in their power sought to deliver

others from bodily, or social, or moral death.

_OUTLINES AND SUGGESTIVE COMMENTS._

_"He that keepeth thy soul, doth not He know it."_ This favour of God

may be here mentioned partly as a strong obligation upon Him to

preserve him who was made after God's image, and whom God hath

commanded him to love and preserve; partly to an encouragement to the

performance of his duty herein from the consideration of God's

special care and watchfulness over those who do their duty; and

partly to intimate to them the danger of neglect of this duty whereby

they will forfeit God's protection over themselves.--_Poole._

The condition of _sinners_ may be regarded as here very aptly set

forth. They are "drawn unto death"--_seized,_ or _apprehended_ for

death, and "ready to be slain:"--and the death to which they are

doomed,--O how unutterably fearful! But you may naturally meet me

with an objection here. In _their_ condition there is _no_ injustice;

_no_ unrighteous and cruel oppression. The sentence of death under

which they lie is a _divine_ sentence--in perfect accordance with all

the principles of equity:--the sword with which they are "ready to be

slain" is the sword of Divine justice itself. They deserve to die the

death. To attempt to prevent it would be to arrest the hand of God.

Ought not divine, and therefore unimpeachable, justice too have its

course? The objection--otherwise irresistible--God has Himself

removed. Justice, infinite justice, had all its claims acknowledged

and fulfilled on Calvary. On the ground of the sacrifice there

offered, the atonement there made, the God of justice and mercy has

called on sinners to accept pardon, in the name and for the sake of

His Son. His call comes with authority. It is a command. It is in

virtue of the satisfaction of justice in the atonement of Christ,

that _we ourselves_ enjoy _our own_ deliverance from the death and

destruction to which, in common with all, we were devoted. And the

very same authority that commanded us to believe and be saved,

enjoins on us to be agents in attempting the rescue of others. O!

what should we not be ready to do, to sacrifice, to suffer for such

an end!--to effect such a rescue!--_Wardlaw._

While Samuel Romilly's Bill to abolish the punishment of death for a

theft amounting to the sum of five shillings passed the English House

of Commons, it was thrown out by a majority in the House of Lords.

Among those who voted against the Bill were one archbishop and five

bishops. Our poet here in the Proverbs is of a different mind. Even

the law of Sinai appoints the punishment of death only for

man-stealing. . . . In expressions like the above a true Christian

spirit rules the spirit which condemns all bloodthirstiness of

justice, and calls forth to a crusade, not only against the

inquisition, but against all unmerciful and cruel

executions.--_Delitzsch._

The Hebrew midwives, and Esther in after ages, thus delivered their

own _people drawn unto death._ Reuben _delivered_ Joseph from the

pit. Job was the _deliverer_ of the poor in the extremity. Jonathan

saved his friend at imminent risk to himself. Obadiah hid the Lord's

prophets. Ahikam and Ebed-melech saved Jeremiah. Johanan attempted to

_deliver_ the unsuspecting Gedaliah. Daniel preserved the wise men of

Babylon. The Samaritan rescued his neighbour from death. Paul's

nephew _delivered_ the great Apostle by informing him of the

murderous plot. The rule includes all oppression, which has more or

less of the character of murder.--_Bridges._

"Who is lord over us?" is the watchword of the life-long battle

between an evil conscience and a righteous Judge. Here the

commandment is exceeding broad. Like Divine omniscience, it compasses

the transgressor before and behind. It checks his advance, and cuts

off his retreat. Although a man should actually maintain in relation

to every brother the neutrality he professes, it would avail him

nothing. . . . What ails our brother, that he needs the compassion of

a tender heart and the help of a strong hand? He is "drawn unto

death," and "ready to be slain." This is the very crisis which at

once needs help and admits it. If the danger were more distant, he

might not be sensible of his need; if it were nearer, he might be

beyond the hope of recovery. He is so low that help is necessary; yet

not so low as would render help vain. He is "drawn unto death," and

therefore is an object of pity; but his life is yet in him, and

therefore he is a subject of hope.--_Arnot._

_MAIN HOMILETICS OF VERSES_ 13 _and_ 14.

HONEY AND WISDOM.

+I. An analogy.+ 1. Honey is found by man ready prepared for his use;

no human skill is needed to make it fit for food--nothing that man

can do can render it more palatable than it is as it flows from the

comb. So the revealed wisdom of God as it is found in the Scriptures

needs no intervention of man to make it suitable to human needs.

2. As honey is evidently designed by God to furnish a wholesome and

pleasant food for the body, so has He designed that the revelation of

His mind and will by His inspired messengers shall provide wholesome

and congenial food for the soul of man. The great abundance of honey

in Palestine led to its forming a more prominent part of daily food

than in western countries, and its possessing these two qualities

made it very fit for general and constant use, and was a perpetual

testimony to the providence of God in relation to the needs and

enjoyment of His creatures. So is the provision which God has made

for the spiritual wants of the children of men. On this point we must

take the testimony of those who have tasted this soul-food. We should

not ask a man whether honey was pleasant to the taste if he had never

eaten it, and those are not qualified to bear witness concerning the

spiritual enjoyment and benefit to be derived from the "wisdom of

God" who have not tested it. All those who have done so, whatever

their condition in life, in whatever age they have lived, or whatever

part of the world they have called their home, have agreed with

David's testimony that it is _"more to be desired than gold, yea,

than much find gold: sweeter than honey and the honey-comb"_ (Psa.

xix. 10).

+II. A contrast.+ 1. Honey may be eaten unto it cloys the appetite

and injures the eater, but not so with the Word of God. Those who eat

the most of this spiritual food are the most spiritually healthy, and

have the keenest appetite for it. 2. Although this God-given bodily

food may do much to nourish and sustain a healthy man, it cannot cure

a diseased body, or prevent the inroads of sickness and decay. But

there is a soul-transforming power in the spiritual food of which it

is here an emblem. Those who eat of it are by it healed of spiritual

disease, and are continually and unceasingly growing in moral health

and vigour. 3. The blessings flowing from eating the spiritual food

are only fully realised in the life beyond the present. To this the

wise man refers in the last clause. (For Homiletics on this thought,

see on chaps. xi. 7, xiv. 32, pages 201 and 391.)

_OUTLINES AND SUGGESTIVE COMMENTS._

Verse 13. The wise man's feast which he makes his son is but one

dish. And what need of more when that is both good and pleasant? The

glutton provideth many dishes, and costly to make them luscious, but

they are not _good,_ not good for the health of the body. . . . On

the other side, the physician provideth divers meats, and they are

_good_--good either for the preservation of heath or for the recovery

of it, but they are not pleasant and grateful to the palate. That is

the best feeding when those are joined together. . . . Or else if

they are not joined together, notice that the wise man putteth good

in the first place; as teaching thee rather to take that which is

good though not pleasant, than that which is pleasant but not

good.--_Jermin._

Verse 14. _When thou hast found it._ That is, when thou hast so found

it that thou canst feed upon it and convert it into nourishment, then

thy pains of seeking shall be rewarded. And though it be a late

reward, for wisdom is not quickly found, yet there shall be a reward,

and that so full, that in nothing thine expectation shall be cut off.

For though hardly yet it is well-gotten; and with pleasure will

sweeten the pains, with good will satisfy the tarrying and recompense

the delay. The Chaldee rendereth the middle part of the verse, _"If

thou hast found, the last will come better than the first."_ As if

this were a mark whereby to know whether we have found wisdom or not,

because then the further we go on the more sweetness we shall

find.--_Jermin._

_MAIN HOMILETICS OF VERSES_ 15 _and_ 16.

A SOCIAL AMBUSH.

+I. A common practice of the wicked man in relation to the good.+

When we think of an ambush of men lying in wait to spring upon their

foes at a fitting opportunity, two hostile parties are at once

brought before us, we feel that there must be deep enmity on one side

at least, or men would not be at such pains to overthrow their

fellow-men. And this is indeed the case in society as a whole. Men

are divided into two great parties. On one side stand the lovers of

righteousness, and on the other the lovers of sin; and the latter

must ever be more or less actively opposed to the former. But their

favourite and most common method of attack is that indicated in the

text. Wrong-doers are naturally cowards, and in their endeavours to

injure better men than themselves they shrink from open attack. They

are fully conscious that they could not stand their ground in a fair

fight in the open field, and so they try to fall upon their foe in a

moment when he is off his guard and in a place where he least expects

to meet them. In other words, evil men do not openly assail either

the character or the position of a good man, but by lying words

spoken in his absence they try to blacken the first, and by secret

schemes to overthrow the second.

+II. An utterly useless attempt of the wicked man in relation to the

good.+ It is useless to try to kill a tree by lopping off the

branches. Such a process may for a time deprive it of its beauty and

stop its growth, but while the root has its hold upon the soil and

can draw nourishment to itself from unseen sources beneath the

surface it will live, and as soon as the axe has ceased to strike it

will begin again to clothe itself in greenness and beauty. So it is

with a righteous man. His enemies may succeed in bringing about his

temporary overthrow and in depriving his outward life of much

comfort, but the springs of his existence are fed from an invisible

and unfailing source, and his well-being is not dependent upon

external circumstances. And so even if the malice of the wicked is

permitted to strip him of some things which made his life more

apparently prosperous and secure, there is an inner life which they

cannot touch, and which enables him in due time to recover from the

wounds which they inflict either upon his character or his

circumstances. For _"This is the heritage of the servants of the

Lord. No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every

tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn"_

(Isa. liv. 17).

_OUTLINES AND SUGGESTIVE COMMENTS._

Verse 15. Because it spites the wicked, that the godly dwell in

safety, therefore they lay wait against their dwelling, by affliction

and miseries seeking to throw it down, and . . . because the virtues

of the godly condemn the vices of the wicked, therefore they lay wait

and search into their _dwelling houses_ to espy out their faults,

because the goodness of the righteous shameth the naughtiness of the

wicked, therefore they seek to break in even into their bedchambers

and _places of rest,_ and there to discover their errors and

infirmities. Solomon forbidding them to do it, showeth it to be their

manner to do it.--_Jermin._

Verse 16. Perhaps you will say, had I fallen only once, I would not

be much afraid; but I have often fallen before the enemy, and one day

I must perish. But hear what God says:--The righteous man falls not

once or twice, but many times, and still he rises. Your experience of

former deliverances should encourage your hopes of new deliverances,

for the salvations of the Lord are never exhausted. In six troubles

He will deliver, and in seven there shall no evil touch

you.--_Lawson._

God's saints are bound to "rejoice when they fall into divers

temptations." What though they _fall_ into them? not go in step by

step, but be precipitated, plunged over head and ears. Say they fall

not into one, but into many crosses--as they seldom come single--yet

"be exceeding glad" says the apostle, as the merchant is to see his

ships come laden in.--_Trapp._

_MAIN HOMILETICS OF VERSES_ 17 _and_ 18.

THE FALL OF AN ENEMY.

Joy at the overthrow of an enemy is a feeling which is natural to an

unspiritual man, but it is one which is here declared to be

displeasing to God. Three reasons suggest themselves why this should

be so.

+I. Such an emotion is inconsistent with a man's own well-being and

happiness.+ The nature that can be indifferent to the calamities of

another, even although that other has been an enemy in the past, is a

nature destitute of all generosity and nobility. But the heart that

can be _glad_ at such an event is altogether possessed with the

spirit of the devil--the flames of exultation that burn upon such an

altar have been set on fire of hell. And as God loves the creature

whom He at first created in His own image, it displeases Him to see

him give place to a feeling so unworthy of his origin, and at the

same time so productive of misery to himself. For the so-called joy

that arises from such a cause is not only very short-lived, but is

like a fire that blazes and burns brightly for a time, and then

leaves nothing but a heap of ashes behind. The exultation over the

fall of an enemy soon dies out, and leaves the heart scorched and

dried by the heat of the unworthy passion.

+II. It is inconsistent with the spirit of brotherhood that God

desires to exist among men.+ If there has been a break in the harmony

of a family, and one member has been at enmity with another, the

oneness of the parentage ought to be sufficient to erase all memory

of past wrongs when the offender is overtaken by misfortune. Such

would be the case where there was any real family affection. God

desires all His creatures to recognise a universal brotherhood in

virtue of their relation to Him, their common Father. He desires men

to be ever ready to seek occasions to draw together in unity, and to

avoid all that deepens an opposite feeling. If a man retains his

enmity against his offending brother when that brother by reason of

misfortune might be reconciled to him, he ignores entirely the law of

brotherly love which God desires to rule in His human family.

+III. It is inconsistent with a right recognition of our need of

Divine mercy.+ However much our offending brother may have wronged

us, the amount of the debt of his trespass against us will bear no

comparison to the amount of our indebtedness to God. In sinning

against us he has but wronged an erring human creature like himself,

and one who has very possibly failed in his duty towards him. But

when we sin against God, we sin against One whose character is

altogether fitted to win us to obedience, and whose every action in

relation to us has been dictated by perfect love. It is only when we

fail to recognise this truth that an unforgiving spirit can possess

our hearts, and it is only when such a spirit has full sway that any

man can exult in the downfall of his enemy.

_OUTLINES AND SUGGESTIVE COMMENTS._

For prevention hereof think thus with thyself: Either I am like mine

enemy, or else I am better or worse than he. If like him, why may I

not look for the like misery? If better, who made me to differ? If

worse, what reason have I to insult? (See Obadiah 12.)--_Trapp._

St. Gregory saith it is only the keeping of charity that doth prove

us to be the disciples of God, and that we have charity is shewn in

two ways, namely, if we love our friends in God, and if we love our

enemies for God. . . . Because another is an enemy to thee, be not

thou an enemy to goodness, an enemy to thyself. For he that rejoiceth

when his enemy falleth, doth himself fall much worse, and hath more

cause to be grieved for his own wretchedness; he that is glad in his

heart when his enemy stumbleth, stumbleth more dangerously in his own

heart.--_Jermin._

For Homiletics on the subjects of verses 19 and 20 see verse 1 of

this chapter, page 676, and chap. xiii. 9, page 303.

_MAIN HOMILETICS OF VERSES_ 21 _and_ 22.

RULE AND REVERENCE.

TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: Be very careful with the word

"niggardly" because it can sound like a racial slur,

especially to those who do not know the word or who are not

paying attention. Consider substituting "miserly,"

"sparing," or "parsimonious."

+I. The rule of some men and the subjection of others is a Divine

ordination.+ God, by creating men with such different gifts and with

powers of mind and body so unequal, evidently intends that society

should not be on a dead level, but that in all communities there

should be some recognised head. And the tendency of men in all ages

to unite under some leader whom they deem worthy to be their head

points to an instinct in human nature which we must refer to a Divine

origin. The law of subjection and dominion has its place in the

natural world. The entire solar system is held together by the

subjection of the lesser bodies to one which is greater than all, and

as the planets move in their orbits around the sun they seem like so

many obedient subjects doing homage to their monarch, while their

attendant satellites are in their turn subject to them. And the

constant operation of this material law is productive of the most

beneficial results. In like manner the observation of some such law

among free and intelligent creatures is necessary to the order and

consequent peace of society.

+II. But the deference of the subject to his earthly ruler must be

always subordinate to the will of the Divine ruler of both.+ There

are cases in which to _"fear the king,"_ in the sense of obeying him,

would be to dishonour God, and times when he who demands obedience

refuses to comply with the Divine demands upon himself. It is obvious

therefore that the fear of the earthly king can only be carried so

far as is consistent with loyal obedience to the "King of all the

kings on the earth." The first precept of the wise man in this verse

admits of no limitation, but the second must be limited by the first.

But those who have been the most faithful servants of God have ever

been most ready to render _"honour to whom honour is due"_ (Rom.

xiii. 7); and when duty has compelled them to disobey their commands

they have done so with all due respect for their lawful authority.

That fear of God which compels them to disobey unrighteous laws makes

them obedient subjects to lawful rule, and constrains them, so far as

is possible, to live as peaceable citizens.

+III. Therefore the peace of a kingdom and the stability of a throne

will be in proportion to the reverence of king and people for the

Divine Will.+ The fear of God is the great adjusting power in all

relations of life. When it governs in the family the parents are

loved and honoured by the children, and the children's welfare is the

constant care of the parents. It is this fear of God alone that can

solve the vexed problem of the relations between masters and

servants, between capital and labour, and between monarchs and

people. Where it is wanting there will be a weak rule on the one

hand, and a niggardly service and a half-hearted obedience on the

other, and both are responsible for those outbursts of disorder which

involve both in a common calamity.

_OUTLINES AND SUGGESTIVE COMMENTS._

The connection of the two fears in the passage before us is evidently

intended to impress the one by the other:--If you fear God, fear the

king. God, whom you are bound supremely to fear, and whose fear

should produce obedience to His Will, has enjoined the fear of

earthly rulers: so that a failure in the fear due to _them_ becomes a

violation of the fear due to _Him._

I need hardly say, that by _the king_ we are to understand the

_government of the country._ It may be monarchical, or it may not. We

are by no means to look upon such expressions as this, in Scripture,

as attaching the authority of inspiration to one form of government

more than to another. Respecting the comparative merits of different

forms, the Word of God should not be regarded as giving any decision,

whether for the kingly, the aristocratical, the popular, or the

mixed. The respect, or fear, is due to _the legislative and executive

powers,_ of whichsoever description these may be.--_Wardlaw._

Submission of heart and life to the King Eternal overrides and

controls, yet does not injure a citizen's allegiance to an earthly

ruler. . . . The fear of the Lord must go first, but the fear of the

king may follow. The supreme does not crush, it protects the

subordinate. Although the heart is full of piety, there is plenty of

room for patriotism. Nay, more, patriotism nowhere gets full scope

except in a heart that is already pervaded by piety. These elements

are like the two chief constituent gases of the atmosphere. The space

which envelopes the globe is full of one gas--it is also full of the

other. To discharge the nitrogen would not make the space capable of

containing more of the oxygen. The absence of the one constituent

destroys the quality but does not enlarge the quantity of the other.

Take away godliness, and your loyalty, without being increased in

amount, is seriously deteriorated in kind. Take away loyalty, and you

run great risk of spoiling the purity of the remanent godliness.

God's works are all good--His combinations are all beneficial. If we

attempt to mend, we shall certainly mar them. . . . Go forward in

your allegiance to "the powers that be," not until you think you have

gone far enough, but until you come upon the law of God, claiming the

space in front for Himself, and absolutely forbidding your advance.

Go forward with the fear of the king, unless and until the fear of

the Lord cross your path like a wall. . . . No feasible rule can be

laid down except what the Scriptures contain. Let any man try to

write down a scale showing when and where private persons may

lawfully resist public authority, and he will soon be convinced that

the case is hopeless. Every attempt to define the liberty of

rebellion will be found to open a door to anarchy. In point of fact,

very little of the liberty that now exists in the world has been

achieved by violent resistance to governments because of oppression

in temporal things.--_Arnot._

_MAIN HOMILETICS OF THE PARAGRAPH.--Verses_ 23-26.

IMPARTIALITY OF TRUTH.

+I. Two blessings to society.+ While there is nothing that more

certainly undermines the moral tone of any community than that

"respect of persons" which the Bible so emphatically and constantly

condemns (Lev. xix. 15; Jas. ii. 1), there is no person who more

contributes to the welfare of society, and contributes more to its

well-being than the man who judges all men by the same standard,

viz., their character. It is especially indispensable that those who

are set apart to administer the laws of the land should be men above

all suspicion of partiality. For, wherever there is a code of law, it

is a testimony to that inborn sense of justice which is more or less

active in every human being; and although it may sometimes be but an

imperfect attempt to render to every man his right, if it is

administered by men of integrity it is one of the greatest bulwarks

of national prosperity and security. It may well be a matter of

thankfulness to every Englishman that the judicial bench of this land

occupies the high position that it does in this respect as in all

others, and that the days when men thought it possible to use

unlawful influences with an English judge have passed away. But to

what do we owe this blessing, if not to the greater hold which the

principles of the Bible has upon our national life? But Solomon

brings before us another character which is as necessary to a

nation's moral health, which is, perhaps, rarer than the first, but

which might and ought to belong to every man. Those who are called to

sit in judgment are the few, but those who in various ways are called

to bear witness concerning persons and things, are the many. And some

who would deem it a crime to have respect of persons in judgment, do

not realise how much the cause of truth and righteousness would be

furthered if men, in their every-day intercourse, would give a "right

or straightforward answer" (see rendering in Critical Notes) to the

questions put to them. If it was the habit of merchants and

statesmen, of masters and servants, in the market and in the social

circle, to speak the "truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the

truth," how much purer would be the moral atmosphere which we

breathe, and how much more nearly would society on earth be like that

of heaven.

+II. The recognition which such characters receive from their

fellow-men.+ In a world where the unrighteous far outnumber the

righteous, and where most men are but half loyal to truth, it is

remarkable that it should be so. But history in general and

individual experience in particular bears witness that Solomon was

right. Even unrighteous men cannot help admiring a just and truthful

man, and their consciences and their experience combine to testify

that they themselves have more to hope from those who are morally

above them than from those who are on a level with themselves. It is

probable that both moral sense and self-interest combine to bring

people as a whole to bless him who rebukes the wicked and to "kiss

his lips" who giveth a right answer.

_OUTLINES AND SUGGESTIVE COMMENTS._

Verse 26. The meaning of that ceremony of kissing him that was

anointed to be king, St. Gregory giveth to be this, that it was to

teach him that was so kissed that God hath brought him to that

dignity to the end that he might make peace between God and his

people that were under him, whereof a kiss is a sign and pledge. For

by sinning we procure the enmity of God, when therefore a ruler is

set up for the correction of sinners, thereby is taken away that

which made us enemies to God. If, therefore, we read this verse as

the English doth, we may understand it that everyone may acknowledge

him to be a peacemaker between God and them, who by _right_ judgment

punisheth the wicked.--_Jermin._

_MAIN HOMILETICS OF VERSE_ 27.

PLAN AND PATIENCE.

+I. Here is a lesson in working with method.+ In all undertakings it

is necessary to consider what is the most important and indispensable

element of success, and to make sure of that first. In the building

of a house in the literal sense, the first thing to be done is to

have a well-considered plan, and to gather and prepare suitable and

sufficient materials. If, when the building is half finished, it is

found that some great difficulty has been overlooked, or that the

materials and the means to procure them are inadequate, failure and

disgrace are the result, and all the time and money hitherto spent

upon the work is thrown away. So in any other undertaking. If a man

desires a certain position in life for which special qualifications

are needed, he must first endeavour to know exactly what the

requirements are, and then make sure that he is able to fulfil them.

If he makes a start without well considering these things he may

waste much precious time and energy, and ruin his prospects for life.

The same principle may be applied to any philanthropic enterprise.

These often fail, because they are entered upon without any just

conception of the difficulties to be encountered, or of the resources

which will be required to carry them on to a successful issue.

+II. A lesson in working with patience.+ The proverb seems to warn

men not to be in too great a hurry to realise the fulfilment of their

desires; not to be impatient to reap the harvest before the crop has

had time to ripen. Men are sometimes so eager to obtain a certain

good which to them appears desirable that they make a desperate and

reckless attempt to gain it by some other road than that of patient

perseverance. A man makes up his mind that he must live in a certain

style, and keep up a certain appearance before the world, and he sets

out to build a stately mansion without waiting until he has acquired

the means whereby he can do it honestly. Men often desire to be at

the beginning of their career where they can be only after days and

years of toil, and if they act under the inspiration of this spirit

of impatience they often most effectually shut themselves out

entirely from the realisation of their desires.

_OUTLINES AND SUGGESTIVE COMMENTS._

This wisdom the very little bees do practise and show us, who first

get honey and bring it into their hives, and afterwards make their

seats and honeycombs. Against this rule here set down divers sorts of

people offend, yea, all that take a preposterous course, whether in

the matters of this life, or in those things that are spiritual. Some

enter into the state of marriage before either they have wit, or have

provided and gotten by their labour sufficient food or wealth to

maintain them. Others lay out much on banquets, buildings, pastimes,

or apparel, before they have a good stock or large comings in. Others

meddle with hard points of controversy before they have learned the

plain principles of religion. Others first and especially seek after

the goods of this world, and, in the second place, at their leisure,

and very slowly, they follow after the kingdom of God.--_Muffet._

Possibly a spiritual meaning here, as elsewhere, lies beneath the

prudential maxim. The "field" may be the man's outer common work, the

"house" the dwelling-place of his higher life. He must do the former

faithfully in order to attain the latter.--_Plumptre._

_MAIN HOMILETICS OF VERSES_ 28 _and_ 29.

AN UNCALLED-FOR TESTIMONY.

+I. There are times and circumstances in which it is our duty to

witness against our neighbour.+ When the interests of right and truth

are at stake, it is wrong for any man to be silent when by declaring

what he knows, he could establish those interests, even although by

so doing he brings punishment upon a fellow-man. It is often

indispensable to the safety of innocent people that the wrong-doer

should be exposed and brought to justice, and every man in such a

case is not only blameless when he witnesses against such a

_"neighbour,"_ but blameworthy when he does not do so. This is not

witnessing against him "without cause," for there is a good and

sufficient reason for the action.

+II. Such witness-bearing is of quite a different character from that

which springs from malice.+ There are men in society who seem to live

like beasts of prey. As the lion or the tiger is ever watching his

opportunity to spring upon some defenceless creature at an unguarded

moment, so these men seem to make it their business to watch their

fellow-creatures for opportunities to injure their reputation and

mangle their character. And in a world of faulty human beings, it is

not difficult for such men to find food for their malicious

appetites, without transgressing the limits of truth. In most men

there is enough imperfection, and in many of actual sin, to render it

easy to make out a case against them. But if no actual good can come

to anybody by exposing their failings, much harm will come to the man

who thus bears witness against them without a cause. The evil

tendencies of his own evil nature will be strengthened by the act,

and he will be exposing himself to the danger of having a causeless

testimony borne against himself in his turn.

+III. There are circumstances in which there is a strong temptation

to bear a causeless testimony.+ It is against this temptation that

the proverb is especially directed. When a man has spoken evil of us

without cause, when he has made public some hidden infirmity, or some

secret fall, there is a great temptation to retaliate if opportunity

offers--to tell what we know about him that will lower him in the

estimation of his fellow-men. But this temptation must be resisted,

both for our own sake and for his, and for this reason among others,

that we are in the worst possible condition for bearing a truthful

testimony. A man under the influence of intoxicating drink would be

altogether unfit to bear witness for or against another. But the

passion of revenge is as intoxicating to the human soul as the most

potent liquor is to the human brain. It distorts the judgment, and

dethrones the reason, and tramples under foot all the noblest

emotions of our nature. A man under its sway would be very unlikely

to be just to the object to whom he sought to return evil for evil;

nay, he would be unable to confine himself within the limits of

strict truth and pure justice. And, therefore, one who has wronged us

is the man above all other men of whose faults we should never speak,

unless there is an overwhelming moral necessity for it.

_OUTLINES AND SUGGESTIVE COMMENTS._

Verse 28. _"And mayhap, deceive with thy lips."_ This is expressed by

a little participle before the verb. It helps in the ancillary

thought, that not only is speaking evil wicked if it can do no good,

but also it may prove actually unjust. All statement has a hazard of

mistake. If it can do some good, we may risk something so as to

_witness;_ but if there can be no good, we should risk

nothing.--_Miller._

Verse 29. It is a great wickedness, when God is made a pattern for

wickedness; and it is a strong temptation to wickedness, when the

example of the Lord seemeth to countenance that which is proposed to

be done. It is therefore against this that the wise man adviseth in

this verse. For though God say, I will render to everyone according

to his works, thou mayest not say, I will render to the man according

to his works. God speaketh as a Judge to whom it belongeth to

consider the works of everyone, and accordingly to reward them; but

no man may be a judge in his own cause, no particular man may do that

for himself which a judge may do for him. Wherefore it is a bad

imitation thus to imitate the Lord, for we are not to do all things

that the Lord doth, but all things that the Lord commandeth us to

do.--_Jermin._

_MAIN HOMILETICS OF THE PARAGRAPH.--Verses_ 30-34.

THE SLUGGARD'S VINEYARD.

+I. We have here a precious possession in the hands of an unworthy

proprietor.+ A vineyard is not a heritage of little or no value--if

rightly cared for and cultivated it will yield to its owners the

means of obtaining an honest living, and, it may be, put him in

possession of wealth. Many a toiling, struggling man without an inch

of ground on God's earth to call his own would feel as if he had

nothing left to desire if he had such a barrier between himself and

poverty, and would joyfully toil from dawn to sunset to make the best

of that which God's providence had entrusted to him. But here is

property which would be prized and cultivated by many in the hands of

one who neglects and wastes it. The picture of our text is a

parabolic representation of what is before our eyes every day. A

vineyard of bodily strength is given to a man who by dissipation

breaks down its wall and invites disease to enter. A vineyard of

opportunities is inherited by a slothful youth who is too indolent

and careless to improve them. The vineyard of a vast fortune or of a

position of great influence is entrusted to one who is "void of

understanding"--who does not realise his responsibility to God or to

men.

+II. We have man, by neglecting to use God's gifts, limiting God's

power to bless him.+ It was God's purpose that this vineyard should

bring forth better things than thorns and nettles. He desired to see

it covered with choice vines, whose branches should be loaded with

clusters of refreshing fruit. But this could not be unless man would

be a co-worker with Him. God did His part. The rain watered the soil,

the sun shone upon it, but man refused to dig and plant, to weed and

cultivate. And by withholding his power to labour he limited God's

power to bless. Men do the same in other fields of labour, and in

connection with the other opportunities of receiving the Divine

blessing. Many good gifts come alike to the slothful and to the

industrious man--to him who diligently "keeps" his vineyard and to

him who neglects it. God makes His sun to shine, and sends His rain

upon the fields of both. But in the one case sun and rain find a soil

prepared to receive the full benefit of the blessings they can give,

and in the other they can only strengthen the hold of the weeds upon

the earth, and to increase the unfruitfulness of the vineyard. So men

often limit God's power to bless them by His providence.

Opportunities are given to them of bringing great blessings upon

themselves or upon others, but only on condition that they labour

earnestly and diligently at some work which God gives them to do.

They may be called only to the special cultivation of their own

intellectual and spiritual powers, or they may also be in a position

to transform others from weeds in the social and moral vineyard into

plants of beauty and trees yielding fruit. But whether the field open

to them is a wide one, or comparatively narrow, all God's willingness

to give the increase will be of no avail if they refuse to till the

ground and sow the seed.

+III. We have a swift and sure-footed avenger advancing to awaken the

slothful sleeper.+ That slumber, though long and deep, will not go on

for ever. It would indeed be unjust to the active and industrious man

if the slothful never felt the consequences of his indolence. But

this would be contrary to the laws by which God governs the world.

One of these laws is, that bodily want, or intellectual or spiritual

beggary, will in due time overtake him who neglects to exercise the

faculties and capabilities which God has given him to enrich every

part of his nature.

_OUTLINES AND SUGGESTIVE COMMENTS._

This is a picture of sloth. At the same time it is a picture of sloth

under attacks upon our faith. The world moves on, and, in our

laziness, our garden gets all choked with new dogmas against the

Gospel. The writer has already said that we are not to yield to

"them that are given to change" (verse 21). He has also said that we

are not to answer them with deceit (verse 28): and, now, what

remains? Why, that we baffle them, that we work as hard as they do. I

know no proverb more useful for the men of our times. We lie upon our

lees till we think philosophy a sort of wickedness; till we think

quiet under its advances a sort of Christian faith. We let science

work on, till, by sap and mine, it is near our citadel. Great bodies

of learned work are built up while the Church sleeps. If she fights,

it is with a sort of chicane, with the gongs and bright paper, like a

Chinese troop; when duty plainly is, to work up abreast of science.

If the Church has more light, she must expect more contest. If she

has better arms, she must expect more battles; with more mind, of

course more to oppose; otherwise she has less to do than less capable

believers. The world's science must be met by the Church's science,

and new, sturdy brambles in her prolific fields must be ploughed

under by improved implements. Otherwise, old-time arguments, and a

sort of a chicane of a retort; responses like those of women, rather

intended to say _No_ than to be an actual reply, become indicative of

a sluggard-Church, and of a garden cumbered like that before us.

_Slothful,_ literally _sluggard man._ Man is here the better _sort of

man_ (see Miller's comment of verse 5); in the last clause it is _"a

common man."_ The first has a _field,_ the second a _vineyard._ All

classes of men are bound to read up and get rid of occasions for

cavil. . . . _"The wall;"_ necessary to keep a church at all. Let

scientists trample in upon the vineyard with nothing but a few old

clothes to scare them, and presently we will have no Church whatever.

Not _"stone wall"_ (E. V.), but _"the wall, as to its stones,"

"pulled down."_ It will not slowly crumble, but interested parties

will help it when it begins to totter. _"I saw, or looked."_ Seeing

such things requires an effort. Not the slothful man's business

alone! but mine! I am sufficiently like him. A vineyard with

brambles, like that of Geneva, or England, or that of the

cis-Atlantic Socinian States, is a picture for all mankind. . . .

_"Come, etc.," "sauntering along."_ Hithpael of walk. _"Armed man."_

Both these descriptions mean (1) _slowness,_ and (2) _certainty;_

(1) unobserved ease of gait; but (2) doomlike certainty in coming. A

Church that enjoys her ease may super-eminently prosper. Her foe may

be behind the hill, and her doom may be sauntering noiselessly up,

but their coming is as certain as the dawn. . . . A "little sleep"

more, and the thing has been actually achieved.--_Miller._

Let _us_ learn from the scene described: 1. How _gradual_ may be the

approaches of the evils of sloth, while, at the same time, they are

_irresistible_ in the end. This is the lesson of the thirty-fourth

verse. The traveller approaches by degrees. When comparatively at a

distance, he appears harmless; but, when he has advanced a certain

length, he is discovered to be _"an armed man,"_--all resistance to

whom is too late, and consequently vain. Famine, though gaunt, is

irresistibly mighty. Who can stand before it? Not the man of habitual

sloth. The very habit has the more thoroughly incapacitated him for

plucking up any spirit to ward off the final ravages of the frightful

enemy. He succumbs, sinks and dies.--2. Our souls are committed by

God to our own spiritual cultivation. This is no sinecure. They will

not thrive themselves. If we would have them "as a watered garden,

and as a field which the Lord hath blessed," we must apply spiritual

activity and labour, to stock them with the appropriate graces,

affections, and virtues, and to promote the growth and productiveness

of them all. We must sow the seed, and seek by prayer the showers of

the Divine blessing--the promised influences of the Divine Spirit. We

must watch over the germination, the springing, the growth, and the

fructifying of the seed. Without this all will be stunted and

sterile. The noxious and unsightly weeds of sin will spring and

luxuriate, and overspread the soil; all growing that ought not to

grow, and nothing growing that should. Let parents apply the

principle to the spiritual instruction of their children. Your

families are as vineyards committed to your care and culture. Imagine

not that, when left to themselves, they will spontaneously yield good

fruit. The experience of all generations reads you an opposite

lesson. You must enclose; you must dig, and sow, and water, and

watch, and protect the springing blade, till it comes to the ear, and

the full corn in the ear. You must train from their earliest germs

your tender plants, and guard, and support, and prune them, and clear

and manure the soil around them. The incessant care of both parents

must be bestowed upon this; and all little enough. They must look for

the help and for the blessing of God. O see to it, that the verses

before us be not a just description of any of your families--from

your parental negligence, indifference, and sloth. Let every family

be as a sacred enclosure for God; fenced in from the blasts and

blights of the world, where the "plants of his right hand's planting"

are reared from the seed, for future productiveness.--_Wardlaw._

Verse 32. The owner did nothing for the farm, and the farm did

nothing for the owner. But even this neglected spot did something for

the passing wayfarer, who had an observant eye and a thoughtful mind.

Even the sluggard's garden brought forth fruit, but not for the

sluggard's benefit. The diligent man reaped, and carried off the only

harvest that it bore--a warning. The owner received nothing from it;

and the onlooker "received instruction.". . . People complain that

they have few opportunities and means of instruction. Here is one

school open to all. Here is a schoolmaster who charges no fee. If we

are ourselves diligent, we may gather riches even in a sluggard's

garden. He who knows how to turn the folly of his neighbours into

wisdom for himself, cannot excuse defective attainments by alleging a

scarcity of the raw material.--_Arnot._

* * * * * *

The Preacher's Complete Homiletic Commentary on the Books of the Bible, Volume 13 (of 32) The Preacher's Complete Homiletic Commentary on the Book of the Proverbs · 第 32 / 39 章