CHAPTER IV.

POLITICAL DISPUTATIONS.

BALDWIN--A YANKEE'S POLITICAL STABILITY--THE YAZOO QUESTION--PARTY

FEUDS AND FIGHTS--DEAF AND DUMB MINISTERS--CLAY--JACKSON--BUCHANAN--

CALHOUN--COTTON AND FREE-TRADE--THE CLAY AND RANDOLPH DUEL.

Among the early immigrants into Georgia were Abraham Baldwin and

William H. Crawford. Baldwin was from Connecticut, Crawford from

Virginia. Baldwin was a man of liberal education, and was destined for

the ministry; indeed, he had taken orders, and was an officiating

clergyman for some time in his native state. His family was English,

and has given many distinguished men to the nation. After he arrived

in Georgia, where he came to engage in his vocation, he very soon

ascertained his profession was not one which in a new country promised

much profit or distinction; and possessing in an eminent degree that

Yankee "_cuteness_" which is quick to discover what is to the interest

of its possessor, he abandoned the pulpit for the forum, and after a

brief probation in a law office at nights and a school-house by day,

he opened an office, and commenced the practice of law in Augusta. He

had been educated a Federalist in politics, and had not concealed his

sentiments in his new home.

Mr. Jefferson and his political principles were extremely popular in

Georgia, and though there were some distinguished Federalists in

Augusta who were leaders in her society, their number in the State was

too insignificant to hold out any prospect of preferment to a young,

talented, and ambitious aspirant for political distinction. Baldwin

was not slow to discover this, and, with the facile nature of his

race, abandoned his political creed, as he had his professional

pursuits. He saw Crawford was rising into public notice, and he knew

his ability, and with characteristic impudence he thrust himself

forward, and very soon was made a member of Congress. Here he was true

to his last love, and became a leading member of the Republican party.

By his conduct in this matter he made himself odious to his New

England friends, who were unsparing of their abuse because of his

treachery.

For this he cared very little; but bore well in mind that "the blood

of the martyrs was the seed of the church," and that the hate of the

Federalists was the passport to Republican favor. His zeal was that of

the new convert, and it won for him the confidence of his party, and

rapid preferment in the line of distinction. He was a man of decided

abilities, and seemed destined to high distinction; but dying early, a

member of the United States Senate, his hopes and aspirations here

terminated. The State has honored and perpetuated his name by giving

it to the county wherein is situated her seat of government.

Crawford, like Baldwin, taught, and studied law at the same time. He

was usher in a school taught by his life-long friend, Judge Yates.

When admitted to practise law, he located in the little village of

Lexington, in the County of Oglethorpe, and very soon was not only the

leading lawyer, but the leading man of all the up-country of Georgia.

Eminence is always envied: this was conspicuously the fortune of

Crawford. The population of the State was increasing rapidly, and

young aspirants for fame and fortune were crowding to where these were

promised most speedily.

The Yazoo question had created deep animosities. General Elijah

Clarke, and his son John, subsequently governor of the State, were

charged with complicity in this great fraud. The father had

distinguished himself in repelling the Indians in their various forays

upon the frontiers, and was a representative man. With strong will and

distinguished courage, he, without much talent, was conspicuous among

a people who were, like himself, rude, unlettered, but daring, and

abounding in strong common-sense.

There was a young man at the same time, a devoted friend of young

Clarke, and follower of his father: he was an emigrant from one of the

Middle States. Violent in his character, and incautious in the use of

language, he very soon became offensive to his opponents, and sought

every opportunity to increase the bad feeling with which he was

regarded. Siding with the Yazoo Company, he soon made himself odious

to their enemies. The parties of Republicans and Federalists were

bitter toward each other, and feuds were leading to fights, and some

of these of most deadly character. The conflicts with the Indians had

kept alive the warlike spirit which the partisan warfare of the

Revolution had cultivated at the South, and no virtue was so

especially regarded by these people as that of personal courage. The

consequence was that no man, whatever his deportment or

qualifications, could long fill the public eye without distinguishing

himself for the possession of personal bravery.

The Clarkes were the undisputed leaders of public opinion in the

up-country, until Crawford came, and, by his great abilities and

remarkable frankness of manner, won away to his support, and to the

support of his opinions, a large majority of the people. This was not

to be borne; and young Van Allen was willingly thrust forward to test

the courage of Crawford. Duelling was the honorable method of settling

all difficulties between gentlemen, and Crawford was to be forced into

a duel. If he refused to fight, he was ruined. This, however, he did

not do; and Van Allen was slain in the affair.

This but whetted the rage of the Clarkes, and John Clarke was not long

in finding an excuse to call to the field his hated foe. In this duel

Crawford was shot through the left wrist, which partially disabled

that arm for life. But this did not heal the animosity; its rancor

became contagious, and involved the people of the State almost to a

man; nor did it end until both Clarke and Crawford were in the grave.

The history and consequences of this feud, and the two factions which

grew out of it, would be the history of Georgia for more than forty

years. Each had an army of followers; and all the talent of the State

was divided between and leading these factions. There were many young

men of decided talent rising into distinction in the professions, who

were of necessity absorbed by these factions, and whose whole

subsequent career was tainted with the ignoble prejudices arising out

of this association. Among the most prominent and talented of these

was John Forsyth, Peter Early, George M. Troup, the man _sans peur,

sans reproche_, Thomas W. Cobb, Stephen Upson, Duncan G. Campbell, the

brother-in-law of Clarke, and personally and politically his friend,

and who, from the purity of his character and elevated bearing, was

respected, trusted, and beloved by all who knew him; Freeman Walker,

John M. Dooly, Augustus Clayton, Stephen W. Harris, and Eli S.

Sherter, perhaps mentally equal to any son of Georgia.

With the exception of Upson and Troup, these were all natives of the

State. Upson was from Connecticut, and was the son of a button-maker

at Watertown, in that State. He was a thorough Yankee in all the

qualities of perseverance, making and saving money. He was a pure man,

stern and talented; and as a lawyer, was scarcely equalled in the

State. He and Cobb were students, and _protégés_ of Crawford, and both

signalized their whole lives by a devotion, amounting almost to

fanaticism, to Mr. Crawford and his fortunes.

George Michael Troup was born at McIntosh's Bluff, on the Tombigbee

River, in the State of Alabama. His father was an Englishman, who,

during the Revolution, removed to the place since called McIntosh's

Bluff. Mr. Crawford soon became prominent as a politician, and

adopting the party and principles of Jefferson, was transferred in

early life to the councils of the nation. In the United States Senate

he was the compeer of Felix Grundy, John C. Calhoun, Harrison Gray

Otis, Rufus King, Daniel D. Tompkins, William B. Giles, Henry Clay,

and many others of less distinction; and was the especial friend of

those remarkable men, Nathaniel Macon and John Randolph.

At this period, there was an array of talent in Congress never

equalled before or since. The aggressions of English cruisers upon our

commerce, and the impressing of our seamen into the English service,

had aroused the whole nation, and especially the South; and the fiery

talent of this section was called by the people, breathing war, into

the national councils.

Crawford was in the Senate from Georgia, and was a war-man. John

Forsyth, John C. Calhoun, David R. Williams, George M. Troup, John

Randolph, Philip Doddridge, James Barbour, Henry Clay, and William

Lomax from South Carolina, were all comparatively young men.

Lowndes, Calhoun, Clay, and Troup were little more than thirty years

of age, and yet they became prominent leaders of their party,

exercising a controlling influence over the public mind, and shaping

the policy of the Government. Crawford was the Mentor of this ardent

band of lofty spirits--stimulating and checking, as occasion might

require, the energies and actions of his young compeers. So

conspicuous was he for talent, wisdom, and statesmanship, that he was

proposed by the Republican party as a proper person to succeed Mr.

Madison; and nothing prevented his receiving the nomination of that

party but his refusal to oppose Mr. Monroe. His magnanimity was his

misfortune. Had he been nominated, he would have been elected without

opposition. The golden opportunity returned no more. He had succeeded

Chancellor Livingston as minister to France, and of these two, Napoleon

said "the United States had sent him two plenipotentiaries--the first

was deaf, the latter dumb." Livingston was quite deaf, and Crawford

could not speak French. At the court of Versailles, he served

faithfully and efficiently the interests of his country, and returned

with increased popularity. He filled, under Mr. Monroe, the office of

Secretary of War for a short time, and then was transferred to the

Secretaryship of the Treasury.

In the Cabinet of Mr. Monroe there were three aspirants for the

Presidency: Adams, Crawford, and Calhoun. Between Crawford and Calhoun

a feud arose, which was mainly the cause of Mr. Calhoun's name being

withdrawn as a candidate, and the substitution of that of General

Jackson. Crawford was one of the three highest returned to the House,

and from whom a choice was to be made.

Some twelve months anterior to the election he was stricken with

paralysis; and both body and mind so much affected that his friends

felt that it would be improper to elect him. Nevertheless he continued

a candidate until Mr. Adams was chosen.

Mr. Clay had been voted for as a fourth candidate, but not receiving

electoral votes enough, failed to be returned to the House. Being at

the time a member of the House of Representatives, it was supposed he

held the control of the Western vote; and consequently the power to

elect whom he pleased. Mr. Clay was a great admirer of Mr. Crawford,

though their intimacy had been somewhat interrupted by a personal

difficulty between Mr. Randolph and Mr. Clay. Mr. Randolph being an

especial friend and constant visitor at Mr. Crawford's, it would have

been unpleasant to both parties to meet at his house.

Only a few years anterior to Mr. Clay's death, and when he was

visiting New Orleans, the writer had frequent interviews with him, and

learned that he preferred Mr. Crawford to either Adams or Jackson; and

was only prevented voting for him by the prostration and hopeless

condition of his health.

The political friends of Mr. Clay from the West knew of this

preference, and would have acted with him, only upon condition that

Mr. Crawford should make him a member of his Cabinet. This was

communicated to Mr. Clay, who assigned his reasons for declining to

vote for Mr. Crawford, and avowed his intention of giving his vote for

Mr. Adams. Upon this announcement, it was urged upon Mr. Clay that Mr.

Adams was uncommitted upon the policy which he had inaugurated as the

American System; that he stood pledged to the country for its success;

and that, without some pledge from Mr. Adams upon this point, he would

be hazarding too much to give him his support--for this would

certainly make him President. Mr. Clay's reply was:

"I shall, as a matter of necessity, give my vote for Mr. Adams: Mr.

Crawford's health puts him out of the question, and we are compelled

to choose between Adams and Jackson. My opinion with regard to General

Jackson is before the nation, it remains unaltered. I can never give a

vote for any man for so responsible a position whose only claim is

military fame. Jackson's violent temper and unscrupulous character,

independent of his want of experience in statesmanship, would prevent

my voting for him. I shall exact no pledge from Mr. Adams, but shall

vote for him, and hold myself at liberty to support or oppose his

administration, as it shall meet my approval or disapproval."

Mr. Adams was elected; and the friends of Mr. Clay insisted that he

should accept the position of Secretary of State in the new Cabinet,

which was tendered him by Mr. Adams. Mr. Clay thought it indelicate to

do so. Whether true or not, the nation awarded to him the making of

Mr. Adams President.

General Jackson had received a larger vote in the electoral colleges

than Adams, and his friends urged this as a reason that he was more

acceptable to the nation, and the voting for Adams on the part of Clay

and his friends was a palpable disregard of the popular will; and that

Clay had violated all his antecedents, and had thus deserted the

principles of the Republican party.

The friends of Mr. Crawford were silent until the organization of the

new Cabinet. There had been a breach of amicable relations between

Crawford and Jackson for some years, and of consequence between their

party friends; and it was supposed from this cause that Mr. Crawford

would unite in the support of the Administration; and when it was

known that Clay had accepted the premiership, this was deemed certain,

from the friendship long existing between Clay and himself. The

terrible paralysis which had prostrated Mr. Crawford extended to his

mind, and he had ceased to hold the influence with his friends as

controller, and had become the instrument in their hands.

General Jackson received a hint that it would be well to have healed

the breach between himself and Crawford. This it was supposed came

from Forsyth, and it is further believed this was prompted by Van

Buren. It may or may not have been so: Mr. Jackson's acuteness rarely

required hints from any one to stimulate or prompt to action its

suggestions. All Washington City was astounded, one Sunday morning, at

seeing the carriage of Jackson pull up at the residence of Mr.

Crawford; for their quarrel was known to every one, and it was

heralded through the newspapers that a reconciliation had taken place

between these great men. The interview was a protracted one: what

occurred can only be known by subsequent developments in the political

world.

Van Buren had supported Crawford to the last extremity, and was

greatly respected by him. His intense acuteness scented the prey afar

off. Mr. Calhoun had been elected by the electoral colleges

Vice-President, and this position, it was thought, notwithstanding his

devotion to Jackson, would identify him with the Administration. He

was young, talented, extremely popular, ambitious, and aspiring, and

it was the opinion of all that he would urge his claims to the

succession.

The indignation which burst from the Southern and Middle States, and

from many of the Western, at Mr. Clay's course, and the great

unpopularity of the name of Adams, was an assurance that without great

changes in public opinion Mr. Adams' administration would be confined

to one term. Mr. Crawford was out of the question for all time, and it

was apparent the contest was to be between Calhoun, Clay, and Jackson.

They had all belonged to the Jeffersonian school of politics--had

grown upon the nation's confidence rapidly through their support of

and conducting the war to its glorious termination. But this party was

now completely disrupted; and from its elements new parties were to be

formed. It only survived the dissolution of the Federal party a short

time, and, for the want of opposition from without, discord and

dissolution had followed. The political world was completely

chaotic--new interests had arisen. The war had forced New England to

manufacturing; it had established the policy of home production, and

home protection; the agricultural interest of the West was connected

with the manufacturing interest of the North, and was to be her

consumer; but the planting interest of the South was deemed

antagonistic to them. Her great staple, forming almost the sole basis

of the foreign commerce of the country, demanded, if not free trade,

an exceedingly liberal policy toward those abroad who were her

purchasers.

The war had given a new impetus to trade, new channels had been

opened, the manufacture of cotton in England had become a source of

wealth to the nation, and was rapidly increasing. America was her

source of supply, and was the great consumer of her fabrics, and this

fact was stimulating the growth of cotton into an activity which

indicated its becoming the leading interest of the South, if not of

the nation. The course of trade made it the great competitor of home

manufactures: this would seem unnatural, but it was true--the one

demanding protection, the other free trade. The source of supply of

the raw material to both was the same, and America the great consumer

for both. Protection secured the home market to the home manufacturer,

compelling the consumer to pay more, and sell for less, by excluding

the foreign manufacturer from the market, or imposing such burdens, by

way of duties, as to compel him to sell at higher prices than would be

a just profit on his labor and skill under the operation of free

trade, and which should exempt from his competition the home

manufacturer in the American market.

All these facts were within the purview of the sagacious politicians

of the day; and were evidently the elements of new parties. Mr. Clay

had already given shape to his future policy, and had identified the

new Administration with it. It was certain the South with great

unanimity would be in opposition, and the sagacity of Van Buren

discovered the necessity of uniting the friends of Jackson and

Crawford. Should he, after feeling the political pulse of his own

people, conclude to unite with the opposition, such a union would

destroy Mr. Clay in the South, but might greatly strengthen Mr.

Calhoun; his destruction, however, must be left to the future. He was

not long in determining. The reconciliation of Crawford and-Jackson

made the union of their friends no very difficult matter. Mr.

Randolph, Mr. Macon, Mr. Forsyth, and Mr. Cobb had expressed

themselves greatly gratified at this restoration of amity; and at an

informal meeting of their friends, Randolph said, in allusion to this

adjustment:

"I have no longer a fear that the seat first graced by Virginia's

chosen sons will ever be disgraced by a renegade child of hers."

Soon after the inauguration of Mr. Adams, and the adjournment of

Congress, the nation was startled with the charge of corruption in the

election of Mr. Adams. At first this was vague rumor. Mr. Clay was

charged by the press throughout the country with bargaining with the

friends of Adams, to cast his vote, and carry his influence to his

support, upon the condition of his (Clay's) appointment to the

premiership in the Administration, should Adams be elected.

There was no responsible name for this charge; but at the ensuing

session of Congress, a member from Pennsylvania, George Creemer,

uttered from his seat the charge in direct terms. This seemed to give

assurance of the truth of this damaging accusation. There was no

public denial from Mr. Clay. The press in his support had from the

first treated the story as too ridiculous to be noticed other than by

a flat denial; but the circumstances were sufficiently plausible to

predicate such a slander, and the effect upon Mr. Clay was beginning

to be felt seriously by his friends. In the mean time, rumors reached

the popular ear that the proofs of its veracity were in the hands of

General Jackson, whose popularity was running through the country with

the warmth and rapidity of a fire upon the prairies.

There was now a responsible sponsor, and Mr. Clay at once addressed a

note to Creemer, demanding his authority for the charge. This was

answered, and General Jackson's was the name given, as his authority.

Mr. Clay sent his friend, General Leslie Combs, with a note to

Jackson, with a copy of Creemer's communication. Combs was a weak,

vain man, and so full of the importance of his mission that he made no

secret of his object in visiting Jackson at the Hermitage; and it was

soon running through the country in the party press, each retailing

the story as he had heard it, or as his imagination and party bias

desired it. It was soon current that Mr. Clay had challenged General

Jackson, and a duel was soon to occur between these distinguished men.

General Jackson, however, gave as his author, James Buchanan, of

Pennsylvania. In turn, Mr. Buchanan was called upon by Clay, but he

denied ever having made any such communication to General Jackson; at

the same time, making certain statements under the seal of secrecy to

Mr. Letcher, Clay's friend. What these revelations were will never be

known: death has set his seal on all who knew them; and no revelation

disclosed them in time. Long after this interview between Letcher and

Buchanan, the former called on the latter, and asked to be relieved

from this imputation, and for permission to give to the public these

statements; but Mr. Buchanan peremptorily refused. Mr. Letcher

insisted that they were important to the reputation of more than Mr.

Clay: still Buchanan refused; and to this day the question of veracity

remains unsettled between Jackson and Buchanan. The public have,

however, long since declared that General Jackson was too brave a man

to lie.

Toward the close of Mr. Clay's life, one Carter Beverly, of Virginia,

wrote Mr. Clay some account of the part he himself had taken in the

concoction of this slander, craving his forgiveness. This letter was

received by Mr. Clay while a visitor at the home of the writer, and

read to him: it dissipated all doubts upon the mind of Mr. Clay, if

any remained, of the fact of the whole story being the concoction of

Buchanan. Creemer was a colleague of Buchanan, and was a credulous

Pennsylvanian, of Dutch descent; honest enough, but without brains,

and only too willing to be the instrument of his colleague in any

dirty work which would subserve his purposes.

Beverly was one of those silly but presumptuous personages who thrust

themselves upon the society of men occupying high positions, and feel

their importance only in that reflected by this association; and ever

too fond of being made the medium of slanderous reports, reflecting

upon those whose self-respect and superior dignity has frowned them

from their presence. Creemer died without divulging anything; probably

under the influence of Buchanan, and it is not improbable he was in

ignorance of the origin of the slander. Beverly knew of its utter

falsity, and was as guilty as the originator, and his conscience smote

him too sorely to permit him to go to the grave without atonement, and

consequently he made a clean breast of it to Mr. Clay.

Mr. Clay and Mr. Buchanan entered public life about the same time,

when they were both young and full of zeal. They belonged to the same

political party, and became warmly attached. They were, however, men

of very different temperaments. The professions of Mr. Clay were

always sincere, his love of truth was a most prominent feature in his

nature, and his attachments were never dissimulations: to no other

person of his early political friends was he more sincerely attached

than to Buchanan--he was his confidential friend; he was never on any

subject reserved to him; and so deep was this feeling with him that he

had called a son after his friend--the late James Buchanan Clay. When

he learned that all his confidences had been misplaced, and that the

man whom he so loved had sought to rob him of his good name, he was

wounded to the heart. He struggled to believe Buchanan was wronged by

General Jackson; but one fact after another was developed--he could

not doubt--all pointing the same way; and finally came this letter of

Beverly's, when he was old, and when his heart was crushed by the loss

of his son Henry at Buena Vista, of which event he had only heard the

day before: he doubted no more. I shall ever remember the expression

of that noble countenance as, turning to me, he said: "Read that!"

Rising from his seat, he went to the garden, where, under a large

live-oak, I found him an hour after, deeply depressed. It was sorrow,

not anger, that weighed upon him. In reply to a remark from me, he

said:

"How few men have I found true under all trials! Who has a friend on

whom he can rely, and who will not, to gratify his own ambition,

sacrifice him? I was deeply attached to Buchanan; I thought him my

friend, and trusted him as such--through long years our intimacy

continued. You see how unwisely this attachment was indulged; I have

misplaced my confidence; I am willing to disbelieve this statement of

Beverly; he is known to you; I believe he is a miserable creature, but

his testimony is but a link in the chain of evidences I have of

Buchanan's being the author of this infamous story. It was artfully

concocted and maliciously circulated. He was too shrewd to commit

himself, and employed this creature to go to Jackson, who lent a

willing ear to it; and he communicated it to Creemer. Yet it was

settled upon him by Jackson. Beverly told Jackson he was sent by

Buchanan, and now the world has the story denied by Buchanan, and I

have it confessed by Beverly. All the mischief it could do, it has

done; and this death-bed repentance and confession must command my

forgiveness of poor old Beverly.

"I was not unaware of the hazards of accepting office under Mr. Adams,

and yielded my judgment to gratify my friends. I was deeply solicitous

of rendering the country independent: our population was increasing; I

was sure large immigration would add to the natural increase; and I

felt it was the true policy of the Government to commence the

manufacture of all articles necessary to its population, and

especially the articles of prime necessity, iron and clothing. We had

the minerals, the coal, and the cotton; and the sad experience of the

recent war warned us to prepare against the same consequences should

we unfortunately be again in a similar condition. I was satisfied that

this policy would meet powerful opposition by those who supposed their

interests affected by protection; and I knew, to build up the

manufactures at home, they must be protected against foreign

competition--at least for a time. Once capital was abundant and

largely invested in manufacturing, with an abundance of educated

skill, this protection could be withdrawn; as home protection would

not prevent home competition, and high prices would stimulate this

competition to the point of producing more than was necessary for home

consumption; which would force the manufacturer to find a market

abroad for his surplus; this would bring him into competition with the

European manufacturer, and he would be compelled to be content with

the prices he could obtain under this competition; this would

necessarily, by degrees, reduce prices at home, and finally obviate

the necessity of protection. Already this has come to pass. The good

of the country I thought demanded this; and for this I exerted all my

powers and all my influence; never for a moment doubting but that in

time and from results the whole people would approve the policy. Nor

did I ever anticipate any political result to my own interest. I have

never thought of self, in any great measure of policy I may have

advocated. I have looked to final results in benefits to the country

alone, with a hope that my name should not be a disgrace to my

children, who should witness the working and the effect of measures

connected with my public life. With an honest purpose, I feared no

consequences; and desiring, above temporary popularity, the good of

the country, I assumed all the hazards and consequences which my

enemies could torture out of the act of accepting office under Mr.

Adams. I have never regretted it, and have lived to see the slanderers

of my fame rebuked by the whole country.

"This terrible Mexican war now raging, I fear, is to result in

consequences disastrous to our Government. That we shall drive Mexico

to the wall there cannot be a doubt. We will avail ourselves of the

conqueror's right in demanding indemnity for the expenses of the war.

She has nothing to pay with, but territory. We shall dispossess her of

at least a third, perhaps the half of her domain; this will open the

question of slavery again, and how it is to be settled God only knows.

For myself, I see no peaceful solution of the question. The North and

the South are equally fanatical upon the subject, and the difficulties

of adjustment augmenting every day. You will agree with me that the

institution violates the sentiment of the civilized world. It is

unnatural, and must yield to the united hostility of the world. But

what is to be done with the negro? You cannot make a citizen of him,

and clothe him with political power. This would lead rapidly to a war

of races; and of consequence to the extinction of the negro. He will

not labor without compulsion; and very soon the country would be

filled with brigands; the penitentiaries would not hold the convicts;

and the public security would ultimately demand that they should be

sent from the country.

"To remove such a number, even to the West Indies, would involve an

expense beyond the resources of the Government; to force them into

Mexico would make her a more dangerous and disagreeable neighbor than

she is; besides, this would only be postponing the evil, for I

apprehend we shall want to annex all of Mexico before many years. As I

remarked, I can see no peaceful solution of this great social evil;

but fear it is fraught with fatal consequences to our Government."

John Randolph, soon after the election of Mr. Adams, was sent to the

United States Senate by Virginia. His enmity to Mr. Clay had received

a new whetting through the events of the year or two just past; and

the natural acerbity of his nature was soured into bitter malignity.

He believed every word of the story of Creemer, and harped upon it

with the pertinacity of the Venetian upon the daughter of Shylock. He

was scarcely ever upon the floor that some offensive allusion was not

made to this subject. It was immaterial to him what the subject-matter

was under discussion: he found a means to have a throw at the

Administration, and of consequence, at Clay; and bargain and

corruption slid from his tongue with the concentration of venom of the

rattlesnake. The very thought of Clay seemed to inspire his genius for

vituperation; his eye would gleam, his meagre and attenuated form

would writhe and contort as if under the enchantment of a demon; his

long, bony fingers would be extended, as if pointing at an imaginary

Clay, air-drawn as the dagger of Macbeth, as he would writhe the

muscles of his beardless, sallow, and wrinkled face, pouring out the

gall of his soul upon his hated enemy. It was in one of these

hallucinations that he uttered the following morsel of bitterness, in

allusion to the story of bargain and corruption: "This, until now,

unheard-of combination of the black-leg with the Puritan; this union

of Luck George with Blifell," (an allusion from Fielding's novel of

"Tom Jones.") Language could not have been made more offensive. But

the fruitful imagination of Randolph was not exhausted, and he

proceeded with denunciation which spared not the venerable mother of

Mr. Clay, then living--denouncing her for bringing into the world

"this being, so brilliant, yet so corrupt, which, like a rotten

mackerel by moonlight, shined and stunk."

This drew from Mr. Clay a challenge, and a meeting was the

consequence. There was no injury sustained by either party in this

conflict, the full particulars of which may be found in Benton's

"Thirty Years in the Senate;" and I have Mr. Clay's authority for

saying that this account is strictly correct.

In General Jackson's letter to Carter Beverly, he states that Buchanan

came to him and stated that the friends of Mr. Adams had made overtures

to Mr. Clay, to the effect that, if Mr. Clay would with his friends

support Mr. Adams, and he should be elected, then he would appoint

Clay to the position of Secretary of State; and that Buchanan

recommended Jackson to intrigue against this intrigue.

Buchanan denied the statement _in toto_. Beverly wrote a letter, in

1841, admitting the falsehood of a former letter of his; and again,

another to Mr. Clay, in 1844 or 1845, asking Clay's forgiveness for

the part he had acted in the matter.

The Memories of Fifty Years Containing Brief Biographical Notices of Distinguished Americans, and Anecdotes of Remarkable Men; Interspersed with Scenes and Incidents Occurring during a Long Life of Observation Chiefly Spent in the Southwest · 第 4 / 33 章