CHAPTER XI

AMERICAN WAR PRISONS

War-prisoners in other countries--The worst in the United

States--British prisoners during the Revolution--Prisoners during

the Civil War--Important Confederate prisons, Libby, Belle

Isle--Sufferings of Union prisoners--Attempts to tunnel

out--Andersonville; situation, crowding, lack of food--Horrible

suffering and high mortality--Conditions at Salisbury, North

Carolina--Federal prisons--Suffering at Fort Delaware--Descriptions

of prisoners held there--Johnson’s Island--Horrible suffering from

cold--Dr. Wyeth’s experiences at Camp Morton--Point Lookout and

Elmira--Mortality statistics--Responsibility for ill-treatment.

England and France are not the only countries in which prisoners of war,

and other non-criminal prisoners have suffered. Indeed the story of

those made captive by the fortune of war is so much worse in other

countries, that the hardships mentioned in the preceding chapters seem

trifling inconveniences in comparison. Strange to say the most horrible

prison pens have not been in Europe, but across the Atlantic, in the

latter half of the nineteenth century.

Imprisonment for debt was common in America during the colonial period,

and persisted after the adoption of the Constitution, but in a thinly

settled country, with no large cities, there was no great prison which

stands out like the Fleet or the King’s Bench.

During the Revolution, British prisoners were taken here and there, but

the numbers except at Saratoga, where General Burgoyne surrendered, in

1777, and at Yorktown, were not large. Generally they were treated as

well as circumstances allowed and besides were soon exchanged. The fact

that they were in a hostile country, where their power to work harm was

slight, made strict guarding unnecessary.

Burgoyne’s men under the convention signed by the British leader and

General Gates were promised transportation to England on parole, and

first were marched to the vicinity of Boston. The agreement was

repudiated, however, and Congress ordered that they be taken to

Charlottesville, Virginia. Madame Riedesel, the wife of the commander of

the Hessians, has given in her sprightly diary an interesting account of

their experiences, first at Charlottesville and then at Lancaster,

Pennsylvania. Evidently there was little suffering. Many simply walked

away and settled in the new country. Others joined the American army and

by the time peace was declared the camp had practically melted away.

Some dark pages tell of the experiences of American prisoners in New

York when the city was held by the British. Even worse were the

experiences in the British prison ships in the harbour. There

over-crowding, improper food and disease, took heavy toll of the

prisoners, but the story is the same, in its essential features, as the

account of the prison ships given in the preceding chapters. A prison

ship was a prison ship whether anchored in British or in American

waters.

With the great Civil War, we enter upon new ground. The contending

parties were not different nations, but sharers of a common heritage

joined both by tradition and by blood. War was waged upon an

extraordinary scale. Never before were so many prisoners taken and held.

While the figures are not entirely reliable, the best estimate places

the number captured by both sides at 674,045, and the number held in

prison for a longer or shorter time at 409,608, truly a stupendous army.

The proper care of such a number of men is task of surpassing

difficulty, even where the authorities are accustomed to handling men in

large masses. When they are not, the machinery must break down. Add to

the inherent difficulty the fact that prejudice was strong, that war

always brings out the petty and cruel as well as the nobler sentiments,

and that one of the contending parties was hard pressed for food for its

own soldiers, and you have the materials for tragedy.

Some prisoners were taken on both sides during 1861, and the number

increased the next year. In 1862 Edwin M. Stanton, Secretary of War of

the United States, stopped the exchanges because of a quarrel about

terms. The differences were patched up, however, and exchanges went on

until July, 1863, when Major-General Halleck again ordered exchanges to

stop. On the Federal side many negroes had been enlisted, a considerable

proportion of whom were runaway slaves. The Confederate authorities

declared that these were not subject to exchange but should be returned

to their masters. Both sides were firm, and few prisoners were exchanged

until near the close of the struggle.

An investigator has counted sixty-eight points where Confederate

prisoners were kept for a longer or shorter time, counting each town or

city as one even though several prisons were within the limits. The

number of Federal prisons was not so large as seldom was it necessary to

remove prisoners because of the approach of a Confederate army. Only a

few are important, however, on either side.

The best known Confederate prisons were Libby and Belle Isle in

Richmond, Va., Salisbury, N. C., Florence and Charleston, S. C.,

Andersonville and Millen, Ga., though at different times there were

large numbers at Danville, Va., Raleigh, N. C., Columbia, S. C., and

Savannah, Ga., but it is chiefly Libby and Belle Isle, Salisbury and

Andersonville, that have filled the popular imagination.

Libby was an old three-story warehouse 140 by 105 feet, in the centre of

Richmond. The building was divided by transverse brick walls into rooms

each about 105 × 45 feet. This was preëminently a prison for officers.

Few enlisted men were confined here, but it was so crowded at times

that it was difficult to walk among the sleeping bodies. There were no

bunks. Wrapped in the thin vermin-infested blankets the men lay upon the

hard floors. There was an abundant supply of good water for drinking and

cooking, limited bathing arrangements, and fair sanitary conveniences.

The ceiling and walls were whitewashed at intervals and the floor was

scrubbed every day. Lying upon the damp floor was, however, a cause of

much sickness.

The food in the early months of use was fair, though the Northern

stomach unaccustomed to corn meal revolted at times. Boxes from home

were promptly delivered, and the sutlers furnished dainties of a sort.

As the months went on supplies in the Confederacy grew scarcer and

rations were cut down. The portion of bread was smaller and of poorer

quality. Some prisoners declare that both cob and husk were ground with

the corn. The meat was poorer in quality and smaller in quantity. As it

was generally served raw, the prisoners cooked it badly. The supply of

vegetables was scanty and sometimes for days none was issued. Boxes were

no longer delivered promptly. Scurvy, dysentery, and severe stomach

troubles were prevalent, and hundreds died.

Yet hope was not given up. The men had resources within themselves.

Prisoners tell of dances, vaudeville performances, and attempts to give

special dinners. The hope of escape did not die. In the fall of 1863

several unsuccessful attempts to tunnel out were made. Col. Thomas E.

Rose of the 77th Pennsylvania regiment had conceived the plan of

tunnelling from the cellar under the street east of the prison into a

warehouse yard. The tunnel led through a fireplace in the cook room,

where the prisoners were permitted to go, down into the cellar. The

piles supporting the walls were cut through with pocket knives, and the

earth was attacked. The only implement was a chisel. A wooden spittoon,

to which strings were attached, brought the earth back into the cellar

where it was spread on the floor and concealed by straw.

The work went on for several weeks, when owing to a miscalculation the

tunnel came to the surface in the street. The hole was stopped, however,

and was undiscovered by sentinels or pedestrians, while the work went on

under the fence. On Feb. 8, 1864, one hundred and nine officers passed

through and fifty-three succeeded in reaching the Federal lines. Some of

the remainder died of exposure, and some preferred death to further

imprisonment. Those recaptured, among whom was Colonel Rose, were

brought back and all prisoners were more closely guarded thereafter.

Belle Isle, the prison for the enlisted men, was a wooded island in the

James, once a place of resort for pleasure. On it was constructed a

prison pen with few buildings. The supply of tents was insufficient, the

water supply not good, and the food worse than in Libby. During the

summer months the mortality was not excessive, but when the sharp winter

came on, the ill-fed, poorly-clothed, badly-sheltered prisoners suffered

terribly. On January 5th, 1864, five are said to have been frozen to

death. The general testimony seems to show that the officers were

humane, but many acts of cruelty on the part of the guards undoubtedly

occurred. Some of the prisoners were desperate characters, bounty

jumpers and the like, and they did not scruple to rob and even murder

their comrades. Many lost hope and observed no sanitary precautions. The

report of the U. S. Surgeon who received late in the war one hundred and

eighty-nine prisoners from this place, says: “Every case wore upon it

the visage of hunger, the expression of despair.... Their hair was

dishevelled, their beards long and matted with dirt, their skin

blackened and caked with the most loathsome filth, their bodies and

clothing covered with vermin.”

As the number of prisoners and the difficulty of feeding them in

Virginia increased, arrangements were made to send them southward.

Orders were given in November, 1863, to select a site for a prison in

southern Georgia. The little hamlet of Andersonville, sixty-two miles

south of Macon, was chosen and a log stockade fifteen feet high

enclosing about sixteen and a half acres was constructed. A small stream

about five feet wide and a foot deep divided the pen, and was expected

to furnish water and carry away the sewage. No shelters of any account

were constructed, and the bake house was so constructed that the waste

from it fouled the stream.

Prisoners began to arrive in February, 1864, before the work was

completed, and during August the number was nearly 33,000. Though the

stockade had been enlarged in June, to include twenty-six and a half

acres, three and a half acres of the area were too marshy to be used. In

addition a light railing fifteen feet from the wall indicated the “dead

line” across which a prisoner passed at his peril. A simple calculation

will show that only a few square feet were available for each of the

poor wretches, and the crowding if nothing else was bound to produce

sickness.

The regular Confederate ration was ordered issued at first, consisting

of one-third of a pound of pork and one and one-fourth pounds of corn

meal with beans, rice and molasses as often as practicable, but this was

soon reduced. Gen. J. H. Winder, commandant of prisons, telegraphed to

Richmond, July 25, 1864, that with 29,400 prisoners, 2,650 troops and

500 labourers, there was not a day’s ration on hand, and suggested that

at least ten days’ supplies should be always kept in reserve. He was

answered that Lee’s army could be furnished with only one day’s food at

a time, and that it was impossible to grant his request.

The quality of the food was bad, the bread was only half cooked, there

was insufficient wood for the prisoners to cook the meat, and some of

the scanty supply was appropriated by the hungry guards who fared

little, if any, better than the prisoners, so far as food was concerned.

The prison also contained many desperate characters who robbed their

fellow prisoners. These outrages became so frequent, that with the

consent of Capt. Henry Wirz, the commander of the stockade, the

prisoners themselves organised a court, tried, convicted and hanged six

of these miscreants, after which, the “raiders,” as they were called,

were more careful.

During the summer of 1864, the stockade was a hell on earth. Ten

thousand men might have lived within the enclosure with some degree of

decency. Thirty thousand could not. The stream could not carry away the

filth, and heavy rains spread it over a large part of the enclosure.

The hospital, though moved to the outside of the stockade, could not

care for the sick. Proper food, medicine, and appliances were lacking

even if the medical staff had been larger and more skilful. The United

States had made medicines contraband of war and many simple drugs could

not be had at any price. Truly the hospital was a “gigantic mass of

human misery.”

The rations issued grew smaller, and more uncertain. President Davis

declares that they were the same issued to the soldiers in the field and

that more could not be expected, particularly as the Confederacy was,

in the face of rebuffs, constantly urging an exchange of prisoners. A

visitor to the Executive Mansion in Richmond, who remained to dinner,

relates that the meal consisted of fried bacon and corn bread. In the

spring of 1864, General Lee had meat upon his table twice a week, but

his usual fare was cabbage, sweet potatoes and corn bread, while

sometimes the troops marched for days with no other food than parched

corn, which they pounded into a coarse powder and mixed with water. Yet

during all this time, there was food in some parts of the South, but

poor transportation facilities made it unavailable.

The mortality at Andersonville was fearful. During July, 1864, it was

62.7 per thousand prisoners. In all, from first to last, 49,485

prisoners were confined here, of whom more than 12,800 died, a rate of

twenty-six per cent. How many more died soon after exchange, or else

dragged out a miserable existence with shattered health and broken

spirits, can never be computed. That distinguished and impartial

historian, Mr. James Ford Rhodes, well says: “Thus insufficiently

nourished, exposed by day to the fierce Southern sun, by night to dews,

drenched with torrential rains, languishing amidst filth and stench,

breathing polluted air, homesick, depressed, desperate, these men were

an easy prey to the diseases of diarrhœa, dysentery, scurvy and

gangrene.”

In September, 1864, the near approach of General Sherman caused the

temporary abandonment of the prison. The inmates were sent to Savannah,

Ga., and Charleston, S. C., and thence to Florence, S. C., and Millen,

Ga. This last named place was soon abandoned and the prisoners sent back

to Andersonville. The place had been somewhat cleansed, by sun, wind and

rain, and as it was not again so crowded, conditions were decidedly

better.

At Florence, conditions were bad, but the officers in charge did all

that could be done with the scanty means at hand, and can not be charged

with neglect or cruelty. The same, perhaps, may be said of Salisbury, N.

C., where some of the Andersonville prisoners were sent, but this prison

deserves fuller mention.

The buildings of an abandoned cotton mill situated in a grove of sixteen

acres were purchased by the Confederate government in the fall of 1861

and at first were used as a prison for deserters and disloyal persons.

Gradually prisoners of war were sent and in March, 1862, there were

about fifteen hundred. There was abundance of room, plenty of good

water, and in spite of the coarse food there was little sickness. These

prisoners were soon exchanged, but others followed them. Still, up to

the latter part of 1864 conditions were endurable. In September of this

year, the commandant, Major Gee, was notified to expect a large increase

which arrived before he was ready for them. Early in October 5,000 came

and 10,000 more before the end of the month. Some tents were furnished,

the buildings already constructed sheltered a number, but the larger

part were left to their own resources. Many burrowed into the hillside,

built chimneys to their dugouts, and whittled shavings for a carpet.

Others built rude shelters from boxes and planks. A train was kept

running to bring fuel, but could not furnish an adequate supply. The

wells were drained by constant use and prisoners under guard brought

water from a neighbouring creek. Many of these escaped, and others broke

through the rickety fence in spite of the “dead line” which existed here

as it did at all enclosed prisons north and south.

The food was poor, the rough corn meal caused stomach trouble, and the

hospital arrangements were entirely inadequate. Preparations to build

more barracks were under way, when the officers were notified that the

prison was to be abandoned. Meanwhile Sherman’s triumphant northward

march threw everything into confusion, and conditions remained about the

same until the prisoners were released. To-day the rows of graves in the

Federal Cemetery, many of them containing unknown dead, show that here

as elsewhere disease and hardship reaped a heavy harvest.

Though much more has been written about prison horrors in the South than

in the North, conditions in the latter section were also deplorable.

Where the Federal soldier suffered from the Southern sun the

Confederate suffered from the Northern winter, and other conditions were

not so different as is generally supposed. James Ford Rhodes, quoted

above on Andersonville, says of Federal war prisons generally:[10]

“Prisons at the North were overcrowded ... bathing facilities hardly

existed, ventilation left much to be desired and the drainage was bad.

The policing was imperfect, vermin abounded.... Some of the commandants

were inefficient and others were intemperate.”

Some prisons were old forts and the prisoners occupied the barracks.

Generally they were enclosures like those at Belle Isle, or

Andersonville, though everywhere except at Point Lookout, there were

rude barracks for shelter, and at Point Lookout tents were supplied.

Conditions differed much at different places, depending somewhat upon

the officers. At Fort Warren in Boston Harbour apparently there was no

cause for complaint, while no former inmate speaks of Fort Delaware

without curses.

This last mentioned prison was built upon a small island in Delaware Bay

about two and a half miles from the mainland. Much of the island was

below low water mark and a dyke kept out the water. Canals of polluted

water crossed the prison enclosure, and poisoned any wound washed in

them. There was little or no drainage, food was scanty and bad, the

officers and guards were cruel, the mortality was high. Alexander Hunter

in “Johnny Reb and Billy Yank” says, describing some prisoners released

from that enclosure: “Scores seemed to be ill; many were suffering from

scurvy, while all bore marks of severe treatment in their thin faces and

wasted forms. They were in the dirtiest, filthiest condition imaginable,

and not a face there looked as if it had been washed for weeks. Their

clothes were torn and ragged; in fact some had not enough tatters to

cover their nakedness. Take it all in all, it was the saddest sight that

our eyes had ever looked upon and made the heart ache to witness it.” Of

one particular friend he says further: “In short, a month’s residence in

Fort Delaware had changed him from the very picture of health and

strength into a lame halting invalid whose body and mind seemed to have

received some great shock.”

Johnson’s Island in Lake Erie, near Sandusky, Ohio, was an officers’

prison, corresponding to Libby. The barracks were old wooden buildings

with many cracks and the prisoners suffered intensely from cold. Many of

them were from the far South and had never seen snow. To them, the sharp

winds from the lake represented a torture unknown, and when in January,

1864, the temperature went down to 25° below zero, the suffering was

intense. At first the food was good, but rations were cut down, sutlers

were excluded from the enclosures, and the prisoners declare that they

were always hungry. Some picked decaying food from the swill barrels, or

ate rats when they could be caught.

Camp Morton, at Indianapolis, was an old fair ground, which had been

turned first into a training camp for recruits and then into a prison.

Some of the barracks were the old stalls once used for cattle. It was

generally considered in the North one of the best managed of all the

prisons. Yet Dr. John A. Wyeth, now a distinguished physician of New

York City, who was captured when a boy of eighteen, in an article in the

_Century Magazine_ in 1891, giving his own experience and that of his

fellow-prisoners, says: “I had no disease. It was starvation pure and

simple,” and again, “No bone was too filthy or swill tub too nauseating

for a prisoner to devour. The eating of rats was common.” He further

says that the one thin blanket allowed a prisoner was sometimes covered

with snow which had sifted through the cracks, and some prisoners froze

to death. The guards are described as harsh and a few as tyrannical, and

even murderously inclined.

The prison at Point Lookout on the north shore of the Potomac River just

above the mouth is described by a Virginia officer, A. M. Keiley, in his

interesting book, “A Prisoner of War,” as consisting of two pens on land

only a few inches above water at high tide. The prisoners taken at

Gettysburg were the first to occupy these quarters. Here tents were

supplied in place of barracks, but the supply of wood was scanty, and

during the winter high winds drove water over the land, and converted

the whole pen into a sheet of ice.

The same officer was then transferred to Elmira, New York, where nearly

10,000 prisoners were confined during August, 1864. The ground had been

a receiving station for recruits. Both wooden barracks and tents were in

use. The water was good and the commanding officer was efficient and

humane, though some of his subordinates are charged with cruelty, as was

also a part of the medical staff. Though an abundance of bread was

supplied, little meat was issued, and after the sutlers were excluded,

August 18, 1864, an epidemic of scurvy followed. Speaking of some of his

fellow prisoners who were finally exchanged, he says: “On they came a

ghastly tide with skeleton bodies and lustreless eyes, and brains bereft

of but one thought, and hearts purged of all feelings but one--the

thought of freedom, the love of home ... some with the seal of death

stamped on their wasted cheeks and shrivelled limbs, yet fearing less

death than the added agony of death in the hands of enemies.”

Who was responsible for all this misery? Was this horrible suffering

deliberately inflicted by the authorities with a fixed purpose in view?

Such was undoubtedly the general belief in the North regarding the

Confederate government. Secretary Stanton as early as December, 1863,

declared that Union soldiers held captive “were deprived of shelter,

clothing and food and some have perished from exposure and famine.”

After the war, Captain Wirz, the keeper of Andersonville, was tried and

convicted by a military tribunal which returned a verdict that he had

conspired with Jefferson Davis and others against the lives of Union

soldiers. Wirz was hanged Nov. 10, 1865, and General Winder’s death

probably saved him from a similar fate.

On the other hand President Davis in a message to the Confederate

Congress in December, 1864, says the Union soldiers were given the same

rations “in quantity and quality as those served out to our own gallant

soldiers” while “the most revolting inhumanity has characterised the

conduct of the United States toward the prisoners held by them.”

Many similar official or semi-official statements were made on both

sides. Mr. Rhodes has weighed and sifted the evidence, perhaps more

thoroughly than any other historian, and his verdict is as follows:

“There was no intention on either side to maltreat the prisoners. A mass

of men had to be cared for unexpectedly. Arrangements were made in a

hurry, and as neither side expected a long duration of the war, they

were only makeshifts devised with considerable regard for economy and

expenditure. There was bad management at the North and worse at the

South owing to less efficient organisation with meagre resources. And

it plainly appears from the mass of the evidence that the prisoner at

the North was the better off of the two, as he always had food and

shelter.”

Mr. Rhodes then compares the revised statistics which show that of

194,743 Union prisoners held by the Confederacy, 30,218 or fifteen and a

half per cent. died, while of 214,865 Confederate prisoners 25,976 or

twelve per cent. died. He then declares that considering all things the

balance was nearly even and that the North has no cause to reproach the

South.

In making up this judgment he undoubtedly takes into consideration the

attitude of Secretary Stanton and General Grant. When the Confederate

authorities, burdened with the great mass of prisoners whom they could

not feed, finally and persistently besought exchange upon any terms,

General Grant said in August, 1864: “It is hard on our men held in

Southern prisons not to exchange them but it is humanity to those left

in the ranks. Every man we hold when released on parole or otherwise

becomes an active soldier against us, at once directly or indirectly. If

we commence a system of exchange which liberates all prisoners, then we

will have to fight on until the whole South is exterminated. If we hold

those caught they amount to no more than dead men.” Therefore, with iron

nerve he resisted all pressure brought to force an exchange, and was

sustained by Secretary Stanton. Both these men must share with the

Confederate authorities the responsibility for prison horrors.

Handling men in masses is always difficult. In the Crimea, just ten

years before the awful winter of 1864, the English army was reduced by

famine and disease to a mere skeleton. Here there was no animus, but

only incompetence to meet the difficulties of the situation. During the

Franco-Prussian War, in spite of the wonderful preparations on the part

of Prussia, bitter complaints of the treatment of French prisoners were

made. But the misfortunes or the failures of one nation do not excuse or

justify those of another. The treatment of the Civil War prisoners fills

some of the darkest pages of American history.

FOOTNOTES:

[1] A “fleet” in early English meant a “brook,” otherwise a “creek” or

“bay,” a term often met with in British geography in the names

Northfleet, Byfleet, Purfleet, etc.

[2] “State of Prisons,” i. 36.

[3] A free inmate who carried messages abroad.

[4] The doorkeepers and porters whose duty it was to recognise all

prisoners, and prevent them from passing through the gate.

[5] Oldys was for many years an inmate of the Fleet Prison. He was

permitted to go abroad to see his friends outside and even to spend the

whole night at large.

[6] The reader will remember Mr. Pickwick’s kindly relief of Mr. Alfred

Jingle and his faithful henchman Joe Trotter in the Fleet.

[7] The manufacture of straw plaiting was taxed and brought in a revenue

to the Exchequer.

[8] This is not correct. Compare with official report, _ante_, p. 194.

[9] Captain Stopford was an officer who had served with distinction in

the Indian Mutiny as adjutant of the 52d Light Infantry. He subsequently

became a Prison Commissioner and is now a gentleman usher to His Majesty

Edward VII.

[10] History of the United States. Vol. v, p. 487.

* * * * *

Typographical errors corrected by the etext transcriber:

the involvent debtor=> the insolvent debtor {pg 38}

que deux heros=> que deux héros {pg 79}

According to the acount there given=> According to the account there

given {pg 101}

the hospital and died there of “_langeur_,”=> the hospital and died

there of “_langueur_,” {pg 168}

detenus=> détenus {pg 234, 240, 274}

on supicion of being a spy=> on suspicion of being a spy {pg 253}

‘_Tuez moi ces coquins ci_’=> ‘_Tuez-moi ces coquins-ci_’ {pg 266}

_tres mauvais sujets_=> _trés mauvais sujets_ {pg 275, 276}

Non-Criminal Prisons English Debtor's Prisons and Prisons of War; French War Prisons; American War Prisons with References to Those of Other Lands · 第 11 / 11 章