CHAPTER X.

LONDON.

JOHN LETTOU, WILLIAM DE MACHLINIA, RICHARD PYNSON.

In 1480, printing was introduced into London by John Lettou, perhaps a

native of Lithuania, of which Lettou is an old form. The first product

of the press was an edition of John Kendale’s Indulgence asking for aid

against the Turks, another edition having just been issued by Caxton in

his large No. 2* type. As we have said, Lettou’s small neat type was

very much better suited for printing indulgences, and its appearance

very probably caused Caxton to make his small type No. 4, which he used

in future for such work. Besides two other editions of the indulgence,

Lettou printed only one book in this year, the _Quæstiones Antonii

Andreæ super duodecim libros metaphysice Aristotelis_. It is a small

folio of 106 leaves, of very great rarity, only one perfect copy being

known, in the library of Sion College, London. In 1481 another folio

book was printed, _Thomas Wallensis super Psalterium_, and probably in

the same year a work on ecclesiastical procedure, known only from two

leaves which were found in the binding of one of the Parker books in

Corpus Christi College, Cambridge.

From the workmanship of these books we can clearly see that Lettou was

a practised printer, though we know nothing as to where he learnt his

art. His type, which bears no resemblance to any other used in England,

is very similar to that of Matthias Moravus, the Naples printer; so

similar, indeed, as to make it certain that there must have been some

connexion between the two printers, or some common origin for their

types. Lettou was assisted by a certain William Wilcock, at whose

expense the two large books were printed.

About 1482, Lettou was joined by another printer, William de Machlinia,

a native no doubt of Malines in Belgium. These two printers employed a

new fount of type of the same school as the other English types, and

one suitable for the printing of the law-books, which were their sole

productions. In partnership they printed but five books, the _Tenores

Novelli_, the _Abridgment of the Statutes_, and the _Year-Books_ of

the 33rd, 35th, and 36th years of Henry VII. The first of these books

is the only one which has a colophon. It gives the names of the two

printers, and states that the book was printed in the city of London,

‘juxta ecclesiam omnium sanctorum;’ a rather vague address, since,

according to Arnold’s Chronicle, there were several London churches

thus dedicated.

After these books had been issued, about 1483-84, John Lettou

disappears, and Machlinia carried on his business alone. By himself he

printed at least twenty-two books or editions. Out of all this number

only four contain his name, and not one a date. He printed at two

addresses, ‘By Flete-brigge,’ and in Holborn. If these two addresses

refer to two different places, and we have no reason for supposing the

contrary, there is no doubt that ‘By Flete-brigge’ is the earlier.

How late he continued to carry on business it is not possible to find

out, as none of his books are dated. The Bull of Innocent VIII.,

relating to the marriage of Henry VII., which he printed, cannot

have been issued till after 2nd March 1486; and the occurrence of a

title-page in one of his books points to a still later date, for we

know of no other book having a title-page printed in England before

1491-92.

Machlinia’s use of signatures and initial directors seems to have been

entirely arbitrary, and it is impossible to arrange the books in any

certain order from their typographical peculiarities.

In the ‘Flete-brigge’ type there are nine books. Two works of Albertus

Magnus, the _Liber aggregationis_ and the _De secretis mulierum_;[34]

a _Horæ ad usum Sarum_, known only from fragments rescued from old

bindings; the _Revelation of St. Nicholas to a monk of Evesham_, of

which the two known copies show curious instances of wrong imposition.

There are, besides, three law-books and a school-book, the _Vulgaria

Terencii_. Of the _Horæ ad usum Sarum_ twenty leaves are known, all

printed on vellum. In size it might be called a 16mo, and was made up

in gatherings of eight leaves, each gathering containing two sheets of

vellum. These gatherings were folded in a peculiar way. As an ordinary

rule, when we find a quire of eight leaves formed of two sheets, leaves

1, 2, 7, 8 were printed on one sheet, leaves 3, 4, 5, 6 on the other.

But Machlinia adopted a different plan, and printed leaves 1, 4, 5,

8 on the one sheet, leaves 2, 3, 6, 7 on the other. It is impossible

to say whether there were any cuts in the volume; there are none in

the remaining fragments, but at the beginning of certain portions a

woodcut border was used, which surrounded the whole page. This border

was afterwards used by Pynson. A curious thing to be noticed about the

type in which these books are printed, is its very strong resemblance

to some of the founts of type used about the same period in Spain.

[34] The copy of this book in the University Library, Cambridge,

wanting all signature _c_, but in fine condition, and uncut, has on

the first blank leaf some early writing which refers to the year 1485,

showing probably that the book was not printed after that date.

[Illustration: PAGE OF THE SARUM HORÆ.

(_Printed by Machlinia._)]

In the Holborn type there are a larger number of books, at least

fourteen being known. Of these the best known and most common is the

_Speculum Christiani_, supposed, from the occurrence of the name in a

manuscript copy, to have been compiled by one Watton. It is interesting

as containing specimens of early poetry. Another book was popular

enough to run through three editions; this was the _Treatise on the

Pestilence_, written by Kamitus or Canutus, bishop of Aarhuus. It is

impossible to say when it was printed, or whether some panic connected

with the plague caused a run upon it. One of the editions must have

been almost the last book which Machlinia issued, for it contains the

title-page already referred to. The most important book in this set

in point of size is the _Chronicles of England_, of which only one

perfect copy is known. In the copy in the British Museum occurs a

curious thing. The book is a folio, but two of the leaves are printed

as quarto. In this type are three law-books, _Year-Books_ for years 34

and 37 of Henry VI., and the _Statutes_ of Richard III. There are also

two school-books, the _Vulgaria Terentii_ and an interesting _Donatus_

in folio, whose existence is known only from duplicate copies of one

leaf. The remaining books are theological, and comprise two separate

_Nova Festa_, or services for new feasts; one for the Visitation of

the Virgin, the other for the Transfiguration of our Lord. These

services were almost at once incorporated in the general volume of the

_Breviary_, so that in a separate form they are very uncommon. The last

book to be mentioned is the _Regulæ et ordinationes_ of Innocent VIII.,

which must have been printed some time after 23rd September 1484, when

that pope was elected. Of a later date still is a _Bull_ of the same

pope relating to Henry VII.’s title and marriage. It must have been

printed after 7th November 1485 (the date of Parliament), and after 2nd

March 1485-86 (the date of the _Bull_).

Another book should be mentioned here, which, though it cannot with

certainty be ascribed to any known English printer, resembles most

of all the work of Machlinia. It is an English translation by Kay of

the Latin description of the _Siege of Rhodes_, written by Caorsin; a

small folio of twenty-four leaves. Many of the letters seem the same as

Machlinia’s, but with variations and modifications.

The number of founts of type used in this office throughout its

existence was eleven, and of these two are very peculiar. One of the

larger sets of type seems to have been obtained from Caxton, but it was

hardly used at all. Another set of capital letters, which must have

been obtained from abroad, occur in some of the latest books. They bear

no resemblance to anything used by any other printer, and look rather

as though they belonged to a fount of Roman type.

Though 1486 is the latest date which we can fix to any of Machlinia’s

productions, it is probable that he continued to print up till about

the year 1490.

Soon after the cessation of Machlinia’s press, his business seems to

have been taken on by Richard Pynson, whose first dated book appeared

in 1493. Though it is impossible to prove conclusively that Pynson

succeeded Machlinia in business, many small points seem to show that

this was the case. We find leaves of Machlinia’s books in bindings

undoubtedly produced by Pynson, and he was also in possession of a

border used by Machlinia in his edition of the _Sarum Horæ_. It is

often said that Pynson was an apprentice of Caxton’s; but we have no

evidence of this beyond the words in the prologue to the _Chaucer_,

where Caxton is called ‘my worshipful master’—a title applied sometimes

to Caxton by printers living fifty years after.[35]

[35] Blades, in his _Life of Caxton_, not only says that Pynson was

Caxton’s apprentice, but that he used his mark in some of his books.

This mistake has arisen from a doctored copy of Bonaventure’s _Speculum

vite Christi_ in the British Museum, which has a leaf with Caxton’s

device inserted at the end.

In his patent of naturalisation of 30th July 1513, Pynson is described

as a native of Normandy; and we know that he had business relations

with Le Talleur of Rouen, who printed some law-books for him. These

books, three in number, may be ascribed to about 1490, or to some time

after Machlinia had ceased printing, and before Pynson had begun. It

was probably very soon after 1490 that Pynson set up his printing

establishment at the Temple Bar; for though his first dated book, the

_Dives and Pauper_, is dated the 5th July 1493, there are one or two

other books that can with certainty be placed before it.

A fragment of a grammar, consisting of the last leaf only, among the

Hearne fragments in the Bodleian, is all that remains of one of his

earliest books. It is printed entirely in his first large coarse type,

which bears so much resemblance to some of Machlinia’s; and was used as

waste to line the boards of a book before Passion Week, 1494.

The _Chaucer_, in which two types are used, one for the prose and

another for the verse, is also earlier than the _Dives and Pauper_.

It is illustrated with a number of badly executed woodcuts, cut

specially for the book, of the various pilgrims in the _Canterbury

Tales_. Some of these cuts were altered while the book was passing

through the press, and serve again for different characters. The

Sergeaunt with a little alteration reappears as the Doctor of Physick,

and the Squire is turned into the Manciple.

[Illustration: FROM THE ‘FESTUM NOMINIS JESU.’

PYNSON, C. 1493.]

In 1493 the _Dives and Pauper_ appeared. It is printed in a new type,

copied evidently from a French model, and strongly resembling some

used in Verard’s books. This type superseded the larger type of the

_Chaucer_, which we do not find in use again. To 1493 a number of

small books can be assigned, all printed in the type of the _Dives and

Pauper_, and having twenty-five lines to the page. Amongst them we may

mention the _Festum Nominis Jesu_; an edition of Lydgate’s _Churl and

Bird_; a _Life of St. Margaret_, which is known only from fragments,

and a legal work of which there is one leaf in Lambeth Palace Library.

The method of using signatures, which Pynson adopted in these early

books, affords another small piece of evidence to prove that he learnt

to print at Rouen, and not in England. In the quartos, the first leaf

of the quire is signed A 1, the second has no signature, while the

third is signed A 2. This way of signing (by the sheet instead of by

the leaf), not a very ordinary one, was commonly in use at Rouen; while

Caxton and De Worde signed in the more usual manner, with consecutive

signatures to each leaf for the first half of the quire.

For some unknown reason, Pynson was dissatisfied with the _Dives and

Pauper_ type, for after 1493 it never seems to have been used again.

From this time onwards, till about 1500, the majority of his books were

printed in the small type of the _Chaucer_, or in some newer types of

a more severe and less French appearance. In his earliest books Pynson

used a device consisting of his initials cut in wood, so as to print

white upon a black background. It resembles in many ways that of his

old associate Le Talleur, and may therefore have been cut in Rouen. In

1496 we find him using two new devices, one a large woodcut containing

his mark, and a helmet surmounted by a small bird,[36] which began to

break about 1497, and was soon disused. The other, which is a metal

cut, is in two pieces, a border of men and flowers, and an interior

piece with the mark on a shield and supporters. The border of this

device is a most useful guide in determining the dates of the books

in which it occurs. In the lower part is a ribbon pierced for the

insertion of type. The two ends of the piece below the ribbon were too

thin to be strong, so that the piece gets gradually bent in, the ribbon

becoming narrower and narrower. According to the bend of this piece

the exact year can be ascertained, from 1499, when it began to get

displaced, to 1513, when it broke off altogether.

[36] The bird above the helmet is a finch, no doubt a punning allusion

to Pynson’s name, Pynson being the Norman word for a finch. Very

probably the birds in the large coat of arms are finches also, though

Ames calls them eagles.

Among the books which appeared in 1494, the _Fall of Princis_,

translated by Lydgate from Boccaccio, is the most remarkable. It is

printed throughout in the smaller type of the _Chaucer_, and at the

head of each part is a woodcut of particularly good execution. The

copy of this book in the British Museum, unfortunately imperfect,

was rescued from the counter of a small shop where it was being used

to make little bags or ‘twists’ to hold pennyworths of sweets. Each

leaf has been divided into four pieces. A _Grammar of Sulpitius_ and

a _Book of Good Manners_ were also printed with a date in this year.

In 1495 no dated books were issued, but the _Petronylla_ and _The Art

and Craft to know well to Dye_ must have been issued about this time.

In 1496, Pynson printed a small supplement to the first edition of

the _Hymns and Sequences_ printed at Cologne by Quentell, and in the

following year he issued a complete edition of the book, and an edition

of the _Horæ ad usum Sarum_. In the same year (1497) he printed six of

Terence’s plays, each signed separately so that they could be issued

apart. About this year were issued two interesting folios, _Reynard the

Fox_, and a _Speculum vite Christi_, with illustrations. In 1500 was

issued the _Book of Cookery_, of which the only known copy is in the

library at Longleat, and the splendid _Sarum Missal_, printed at the

expense of Cardinal Morton, and generally known as the Morton Missal.

Of updated books printed about this time we may notice especially,

editions of _Guy of Warwick_, _Maundeville’s Travels_, _Informatio

Puerorum_, a few small school-books, and a number of year-books and

other legal works.

About 1502-3, Pynson changed his residence from outside Temple Bar to

the George in Fleet Street, where he continued to the end of his life.

His career as a printer is curiously different from Wynkyn de Worde’s.

The latter was the popular printer, publishing numbers of slight books

of a kind likely to appeal to the public. Pynson, on the other hand,

was in a more official position as King’s printer, and seems to have

been generally chosen as the publisher of learned books. Wynkyn de

Worde printed ten slight books for every one of a more solid character;

with Pynson the average was about equal.

From 1510 onwards we find frequent entries relating to Pynson in all

the accounts of payments made by Henry VIII., and these show that

he was clearly the royal printer, and in receipt of an annuity. In

September 1509, he issued the _Sermo fratris Hieronymi de Ferraria_,

which contains the first Roman type used in England. In 1513 appeared

the _Sege and Dystruccyon of Troye_, of which there are several copies

known, printed upon vellum.

Pynson’s will is dated 18th November 1529, and was proved on 18th

February 1530. He was succeeded in business by Robert Redman, who had

been for a few years previously his rather unscrupulous rival.

The last few years of the fifteenth century saw a great change in the

development of English printing. Up to the time of Caxton’s death

in 1491, there seems to have been little foreign competition, but

immediately after this date the state of things altered entirely.

Both France and Italy produced books for the English market, and sent

over stationers to dispose of them: Gerard Leeu at Antwerp printed a

number of English books, mostly of a popular character, while Hertzog

in Venice; and a number of printers in Paris, printed service-books of

Sarum use.

By 1493 two stationers were settled in England; one, Frederick Egmondt,

as an agent for Hertzog, the other, Nicholas Lecompte, who sold books

printed in Paris. Though we only know of these two as stationers

through their names appearing in the colophons of books with which

they were connected, there must have been many others of whom we have

no trace. After the Act of 1483, which so strongly encouraged foreign

importations, a very large number of books for the English market were

printed abroad. This was at first occasioned by the small variety

in the number of types and the scarcity of ornamental letters and

woodcuts. In 1487, Caxton commissioned George Maynyal, a Paris printer,

to print an edition of the _Sarum Missal_, and this is the first

foreign printed book for sale in England whose history we know. About

ten years previously, a _Sarum Breviary_ had been printed at Cologne,

and in 1483 another edition at Venice. The first edition of the _Sarum_

_Missal_ was printed about 1486 by Wenssler at Basle. In the fifteenth

century, at least fifty books are known to have been printed abroad

for sale in England. Most of these were service-books, but there were

a few of other classes. Gerard Leeu reprinted three of Caxton’s books,

_The Chronicles_, _The History of Jason_, and the _History of Paris

and the fair Vienne_, and added a fourth popular book to these, which

had not previously appeared in English, the _Dialogues of Salomon and

Marcolphus_. In addition to these, he printed editions of the _Sarum

Directorium Sacerdotum_ and _Horæ_.

Another class of books produced abroad were school-books, and the

earliest of these for English use is an edition of the grammatical

tracts of _Perottus_, printed at Louvain in 1486 by Egidius van der

Heerstraten. In the same year Leeu printed the _Vulgaria_, and very

shortly afterwards editions of the Grammars by Anwykyll and the

_Garlandia_ were issued from Deventer, Antwerp, Cologne, and Paris.

The greater portion, however, of this foreign importation consisted

of service-books, at least forty editions being sent over from abroad

before 1501. From Venice were sent Breviaries and Missals, printed for

the most part by Johannes de Landoia dictus Hertog. As we have said,

the first edition of the _Sarum Breviary_ was printed at Cologne by an

unknown printer, and the first edition of the _Sarum Missal_ at Basle

by Wenssler about 1486. From Paris and Rouen came the greater number

of _Horæ_, and such books as the _Legenda_, _Manuale_, and _Liber

Festivalis_.

It is impossible to enter here with any fulness into the history of the

earliest stationers and the books printed abroad for sale in England.

It is rather foreign to our present subject, but would well repay

careful study.

Early Printed Books · 第 10 / 13 章