I hesitated, nonplussed.

"Come!" he said impatiently. "Look here; I will prove that anarchy is

the ideal government, or that Heaven and Hell are the same place, or

that--"

"Prove that!" I said. "About Heaven and Hell."

"Easily. First we will endow my robot with intelligence. I add a

mechanical memory by means of the old Cushman delayed valve; I add a

mathematical sense with any of the calculating machines; I give it a

voice and a vocabulary with the magnetic-impulse wire phonograph. Now

the point I make is this: Granted an intelligent machine, does it not

follow that every other machine constructed like it must have the

identical qualities? Would not each robot given the same insides have

exactly the same character?"

"No!" I snapped. "Human beings can't make two machines exactly alike.

There'd be tiny differences; one would react quicker than others, or one

would prefer Fox Airsplitters as prey, while another reacted most

vigorously to Carnecars. In other words, they'd have--_individuality_!"

I grinned in triumph.

"My point exactly," observed van Manderpootz. "You admit, then, that

this individuality is the result of imperfect workmanship. If our means

of manufacture were perfect, all robots would be identical, and this

individuality would not exist. Is that true?"

"I--suppose so."

"Then I argue that our own individuality is due to our falling short of

perfection. All of us--even van Manderpootz--are individuals only

because we are not perfect. Were we perfect, each of us would be exactly

like everyone else. True?"

"Uh--yes."

"But Heaven, by definition, is a place where all is perfect. Therefore,

in Heaven everybody is exactly like everybody else, and _therefore_,

everybody is thoroughly and completely bored! There is no torture like

boredom, Dixon, and--Well, have I proved my point?"

The Ideal · 第 3 / 9 题