CHARACTER OF CROMWELL.

(_From the Buccaneer.--By Mrs. S.C. Hall_.)

There are two things that to a marvellous degree bring people under

subjection--moral and corporeal fear. The most dissolute are held in

restraint by the influence of moral worth, and there are few who would

engage in a quarrel if they were certain that defeat or death would be

the consequence. Cromwell obtained, and we may add, maintained his

ascendancy over the people of England, by his earnest and continually

directed efforts towards these two important ends. His court was a

rare example of irreproachable conduct, from which all debauchery

and immorality were banished; while such was his deep and intimate

though mysterious acquaintance with every occurrence throughout the

commonwealth, its subjects had the certainty of knowing that, sooner or

later, whatever crimes they committed would of a surety reach the ear

of the protector. His natural abilities must always have been of the

highest order, though in the early part of his career he discovered

none of those extraordinary talents that afterwards gained him so

much applause, and worked so upon the affections of the hearers

and standers-by. His mind may be compared to one of those valuable

manuscripts that had long been rolled up and kept hidden from vulgar

eyes, but which exhibits some new proof of wisdom at each unfolding. It

has been well said by a philosopher, whose equal the world has not known

since his day, "that a place sheweth the man." Of a certainty Cromwell

had no sooner possessed the opportunity so to do, than he showed to the

whole world that he was destined to govern. "Some men achieve greatness,

some men are born to greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon

them." With Cromwell greatness was achieved. He was the architect of

his own fortunes, owing little to what is called "chance," less to

patronage, and still less to crime, if we except the one sad blot upon

the page of his own history, as connected with that of his country.

There appears in his character but a small portion of that which is

evil, blended with much that is undoubtedly good. Although his public

speeches were, for the most part, ambiguous--leaving others to pick out

his meaning--or more frequently still, having no meaning to pick out,

being words, words, words--strung of mouldy sentences, scriptural

phrases, foolish exclamations, and such-like: yet when necessary, he

showed that he could sufficiently command his style, delivering himself

with so much energy, pith, propriety, and strength of expression, that

it was commonly said of him under such circumstances, "every word he

spoke was a thing." But the strongest indication of his vast abilities

was, the extraordinary tact with which he entered into, dissected, and

scrutinized the nature of human kind. No man ever dived into the manners

and minds of those around him with greater penetration, or more rapidly

discovered their natural talents and tempers. If he chanced to hear

of a person fit for his purpose, whether as a minister, a soldier, an

artisan, a preacher, or a spy, no matter how previously obscure, he sent

for him forthwith, and employed him in the way in which he could be made

most useful, and answer best the purpose of his employer. Upon this most

admirable system (a system in which, unhappily, he has had but few

imitators among modern statesmen,) depended in a great degree his

success. His devotion has been sneered at; but it has never been proved

to have been insincere. With how much more show of justice may we

consider it to have been founded upon a solid and upright basis, when we

recollect that his whole outward deportment spoke its truth! Those who

decry him as a fanatic, ought to bethink themselves that religion was

the chivalry of the age in which he lived. Had Cromwell been born a few

centuries earlier, he would have headed the crusades, with as much

bravery, and far better results than our noble-hearted, but wrong-headed

Coeur de Lion. It was no great compliment that was passed on him by the

French minister, when he called the protector "the first captain of the

age." His courage and conduct in the field were undoubtedly admirable:

he had a dignity of soul which the greatest dangers and difficulties

rather animated than discouraged, and his discipline and government of

the army, in all respects, was the wonder of the world. It was no

diminution of this part of his character, that he was wary in his

conduct, and that, after he was declared protector, he wore a coat of

mail concealed beneath his dress. Less caution than he made use of, in

the place he held, and surrounded as he was by secret and open enemies,

would have deserved the name of negligence. As to his political

sincerity, which many think had nothing to do with his religious

opinions, he was, to the full, as honest as the first or second Charles.

Of a truth, that same sincerity, it would appear, is no kingly virtue!

Cromwell loved justice as he loved his own life, and wherever he was

compelled to be arbitrary, it was only where his authority was

controverted, which, as things then were, it was not only right to

establish for his own sake, but for the peace and security of the

country over whose proud destinies he had been called to govern. "The

dignity of the crown," to quote his own words, "was upon the account of

the nation, of which the king was only the representative head, and

therefore, the nation being still the same, he would have the same

respect paid to his ministers as if he had been a king." England ought

to write the name of Cromwell in letters of gold, when she remembers

that, within a space of four or five years, he avenged all the insults

that had been lavishly flung upon her by every country in Europe

throughout a long, disastrous, and most perplexing civil war.

Gloriously did he retrieve the credit that had been mouldering and

decaying during two weak and discreditable reigns of nearly fifty years'

continuance--gloriously did he establish and extend his country's

authority and influence in remote nations--gloriously acquire the real

mastery of the British Channel--gloriously send forth fleets that went

and conquered, and never sullied the union flag by an act of dishonour

or dissimulation. Not a single Briton, during the protectorate, but

could demand and receive either reparation or revenge for injury,

whether it came from France, from Spain, from any open foe or

treacherous ally; not an oppressed foreigner claimed his protection but

it was immediately and effectually granted. Were things to be compared

to this in the reign of either Charles? England may blush at the

remembrance of the insults she sustained during the reigns of the first

most amiable, yet most weak--of the second most admired, yet most

contemptible--of these legal kings. What must she think of the treatment

of the elector palatine, though he was son-in-law to king James? And let

her ask herself how the Duke of Rohan was assisted in the Protestant war

at Rochelle, notwithstanding the solemn engagement of king Charles under

his own hand! But we are treading too fearlessly upon ground on which,

in our humble capacity, we have scarcely the right to enter. Alas! alas!

the page of history is but a sad one; and the Stuarts and the Cromwells,

the roundheads and the cavaliers, the pennons and the drums, are but

part and parcel of the same dust--the dust we, who are made of dust

animated for a time by a living spirit, now tread upon! Their words,

that wrestled with the winds and mounted on the air, have left no trace

along that air whereon they sported:--the clouds in all their beauty cap

our isle with their magnificence, as in those by-gone days; the rivers

are as blue, the seas as salt; the flowers, those sweet things! remain

fresh within our fields, as when God called them into existence in

Paradise, and are bright as ever. But the change is over us, as it has

been over them: we, too, are passing. O England! what should this teach?

Even three things--wisdom, justice, and mercy. Wisdom to watch

ourselves, and then our rulers, so that we neither do nor suffer wrong;

justice to the memory of the mighty dead, whether born to thrones or

footstools; mercy, inasmuch as we shall deeply need it from our

successors.

* * * * *

The Mirror of Literature, Amusement, and Instruction. Volume 20, No. 582, December 22, 1832 · 第 26 / 36 题