Chapter XIV

Mental Attitudes in Their Relation to Syphilis

One's way of looking at a thing has an immense influence on what one

does about it. Obvious as this principle is in the every-day affairs of

life, it becomes still more obvious as one studies a disease and watches

the way in which different individuals react to it. The state of mind of

a few people infected with a rare condition may not seem a matter of

more than passing interest, but in a disease which is a wide-spread and

disastrous influence in human life, the sum-total of our states of mind

about it determines what we do against it and, to no small degree, what

it does to us. Syphilis as a medical problem offers comparatively few

difficulties at the present day. What blocks our progress now is largely

an affair of mental attitudes, of prejudices, of fears, or shame, of

ignorance, stupidity, or indifference. Mental strain, a powerful

influence in many diseases, is a factor in syphilis also, and the state

of mind of the patient has often almost as much to do with the success

of his treatment as has salvarsan or mercury. For that reason it is

worth while to devote a chapter to picturing in a general way the mental

side of syphilis.

+The Public Attitude Toward Syphilis.+--First of all, in order to

understand the mental state of the patient, consider once more the

attitude of the world at large toward the victim of syphilis. A few who

are frankly ignorant of the existence of the disease to start with are

unprejudiced when approached in the right way. But ninety-eight persons

in a hundred who know that there is such a disease as syphilis are alive

to the fact that it is considered a disgrace to have it, and to little

else. Such a feeling naturally chokes all but secret discussion of it.

Most of us remember the day when newspaper copy containing reference to

tuberculosis did not find ready publication. Syphilis is just crossing

this same threshold into publicity. It is now possible to get the name

of the disease into print outside of medical works and to have it

referred to in other ways than as "blood poisoning" in quack

advertisements. The mention of it in lectures on sex hygiene is an

affair of the last twenty years, and the earlier discussions of the

disease on such occasions were only too often vague, prejudiced, and

inaccurate. There are many who still believe, as did an old librarian

whom I met in my effort to reach an important reference work on syphilis

in a great public library. "We used to keep them on the shelves," he

said, "until the high school boys began to get interested, and then we

thought we would reserve the subject for the profession." Syphilis has

been reserved for the profession for five hundred years and the disease

has grown fat on it. The lean times will come when a reasonable

curiosity about syphilis can be satisfied without either shame or

secrecy by a reasonable presentation of the facts. We need the light on

this subject and the light on reserved shelves is notoriously poor. The

stigma attaching to syphilis as a disease is one of the most tragic

examples of a great wrong done to do a little right. What if there are a

few who deserve what they got? We may well ask ourselves how free we are

to cast the first stone. And why single out syphilis as the badge of

venery? The "itch" is transmitted by sexual relations too. Why not make

the itch a sign of shame? The power that has done the damage is not the

intrinsic viciousness of syphilis, but the survival of the old idea of

sexual taboo, the feeling that sex is a secret, shameful thing,

essentially unclean. To this age-old myth some one added the idea of

punishment, and brutalized our conception of syphilis for centuries. If

there were a semblance of crude, stern justice in accepting syphilis as

the divinely established punishment for sexual wrong-doing, protest

would lose half its meaning. Not only does syphilis fail to punish

justly, but there is also something savage, akin almost to the mental

attitude that makes "frightfulness" possible in war, in the belief that

it is necessary to make headway against a sexual enemy by torturing,

ruining, and dismembering men, women, and children, putting out the eyes

of the boy who made a slip through bad companionship and mutilating the

girl who loved "not wisely but too well." Only innocence pays the

spiritual price of syphilis. The very ones whose punishment it should be

are the most indifferent to it, and the least influenced by fear of it

in their pursuit of sexual gratification. I always recall with a shock

the utterance of a university professor in the days when salvarsan was

expected to cure syphilis at a single dose. He rated it as a catastrophe

that any such drug should have been discovered, because he felt that it

would remove a great barrier to promiscuous relations between men and

women--the fear of venereal disease. This is the point of view that

perpetuates the disease among us. It is this attitude of mind that

maintains an atmosphere of disgrace and secrecy and shame about a great

problem in public health and muddles our every attempt to solve it.

Those who feel syphilis to be an instrument adapted to warfare against

sexual mistakes, and are prepared to concede "frightfulness" to be

honorable warfare, will, of course, fold their hands and smugly roll

their eyes as they repeat the words of the secretary of a London Lock

hospital, "I don't believe in making it safe."[14]

[14] Quoted by Flexner in "Prostitution in Europe."

+Syphilis as a "Disgrace" and a "Moral Force."+--If syphilis really

deterred, really acted as an efficient preventive of license, we might

have to tolerate this attitude of mind, even though we disagreed with

it. I had occasion, during a period of two years, to live in the most

intimate association with about 800 people who had syphilis--every kind

of person from the top to the bottom of the social scale. It was not a

simple matter of ordering pills for them from the pharmacy, or castor

oil from the medicine room. I had to sit beside their beds when they

heard the truth; I had to see the women crumple up and go limp; I had

to tell the blind child's father that he did it, to bolster up the weak

girl, to rebuild the wife's broken ideals, to suppress the rowdy and the

roysterer, to hear the vows of the boy who was paying for his first

mistake, and listen to the stories of the pimp and the seducer. What

made syphilis terrible to the many really fine and upright spirits in

the mass thus flung together in a common bondage? It was not the fear of

paresis, or of any other consequence of the disease. It was the torture

of disgrace, unearned shame, burnt into their backs by those who think

syphilis a weapon against prostitution and a punishment for sin. It

wrecked some of them effectually--left them nothing to live for. It

case-hardened others against the world in a way you and I can well pray

we may never be case-hardened. It left scars on others, and others

laughed it off. Hundreds of sexual offenders passed through my hands,

and in the closest study of their points of view I was unable to find

that in more than rare cases had the risk of syphilis any real power to

control the expression of their desires. Sexual morality is a complex

affair, in which the habit of self-control in many other activities of

life plays an important part. The man or woman who best deserves to be

called clean and honorable and sexually blameless has not become so

through a negative morality and an enlightened selfishness. The man who

does not have bred into him from childhood the instinct to say the

"everlasting no" to his passions will never learn to say it from the

fear of syphilis. Sexual self-control is a habit, not a reasoned-out

affair, and its foundation must rest on the rock bottom of character

and not in the muck of venereal disease.

+The Broader Outlook.+--If, then, it avails nothing in the uplifting of

our morals to treat syphilis as a disgrace, if the disease is

ineffective as a deterrent, and barbarously undiscriminating, inhuman,

and unjust as a punishment, let us in all fairness lay aside the

attitude of mind which has so hindered and defeated our efforts to deal

with it as an arch enemy to human health, happiness, and effectiveness.

In the face of all our harsh traditions it takes a good deal of breadth

of view to look on the disease impersonally, rather than in the light of

one or two contemptible examples of it whom we may happen to know. But,

after all, to think in large terms and with a sympathy that can separate

the sinner from his sin and the sick man from the folly that got the

best of him, is no mean achievement, well worthy of the Samaritan in

contrast with the Levite. To the remaking of the traditional attitude of

harsh, unkindly judgment upon those unfortunate enough to have a

terrible disease, we must look for our soundest hope of progress.

+The Mental States of Syphilitics.+--The mental outlook of the person

with syphilis is in its turn as important a factor in our campaign

against the disease as is that of the person without it. In order to

give some idea of the ways in which this can influence the situation it

may be well to sketch what might be called the four types of mind with

which one has to deal--the conscientious, the average, the

irresponsible, and the morbid. Under the morbid type are included those

persons who, without having syphilis, are in morbid fear of the disease,

or have the fixed belief that they are infected with it, even when they

are not.

+The Conscientious Type.+--Conscientious patients, speaking from the

physician's standpoint, are the product of intelligence and character

combined. Though distinctly in the minority, and usually met in the

better grades of private practice, one is often surprised how many there

are, considering the treacherous and deceptive features of the disease,

which leave so much excuse for laxity and misunderstanding on the part

of the laymen. A conscientious patient is one who is not content with

any ideal short of that of radical cure. It takes unselfishness and

self-control to go without those things which make the patient in the

infectious stage dangerous to others. For a time life seems pretty well

stripped of its pleasures for the man who may not smoke, must always

think beforehand whether any contact which he makes with persons or

things about him may subject others to risk of infection, and perhaps

must meet the misunderstanding and condemnation of others whom he has to

take into his confidence for the same purpose. An element of moral

courage and a keen sense of personal responsibility help to make the

ideal patient in this disease. To meet a treatment appointment promptly

at the same day and hour week after week, to go through the drudgery of

rubbing mercurial ointment, for example, to say nothing of the

unpleasantness of the method to a cleanly person, night after night for

weeks, takes unmistakable grit and a well-developed sense of moral

obligation. The man who has been cured of syphilis has passed through a

discipline which calls for the best in him, and repays him in terms of

better manhood as well as better health.

The physician's coöperation in the development of the necessary sense of

responsibility and the requisite character basis for a successful

treatment is invaluable. To the large majority of the victims of the

disease it is a severe shock to find out what ails them. Many of them,

without saying much about it, give up all hope for a worth-while life

from the moment they learn of their condition. Just as in the old days

the belief that consumption was incurable cost nearly as many lives as

the disease itself, by leading victims to give up the fight when a

little persistence would have won it, so among many who acquire

syphilis, especially when it is contracted under distressing

circumstances, there is a lowering of the victims' fighting strength, a

sapping of their courage which makes them an easy prey to the

indifference to cure that is so fatal in this disease. The person with

syphilis should have the benefit of all the friendly counsel,

reassurance, and moral support that his physician can give, and such

time and labor on the latter's part are richly repaid.

+The Average State of Mind.+--The average mental attitude stops

tantalizingly short of the best type of conscientiousness. Average

patients are good coöperators in the beginning of a course of treatment

or while the symptoms are alarming or obvious, but their energy leaves

them once they are outwardly cured. The average patient only too often

overrules his physician's good judgment on trivial grounds, slight

inconveniences, and temporary considerations, forgetting that cure is

what he needs more than anything else in the world. The deprivations go

hard with this type of patients, and it is difficult, almost impossible,

to persuade them to stop smoking or to abstain from sexual relations or

other contacts that are apt to subject others to risk. Average patients

will almost never remain under the care of a physician until cured. A

year, or at the most two years, is all that can be expected, and a

second or third negative blood test is usually the signal for their

disappearance. They are, of course, lost in the great unknown of

syphilis, and swell the total of deaths from internal causes of

syphilitic origin, such as diseases of the arteries and of the nervous

system. A good many have to be treated for relapses, but the amount of

infection spread by them, while of course unknown, is probably small

considering how many of them there are.

+Effect of the High Cost of Treatment.+--A factor which is extremely

influential in forcing average treatment and ideals on those who, if

opportunity were more abundant, would be conscientious about the

disease, has already been mentioned as the cost of treatment, which is

such that persons with small incomes, who are too proud or sensitive to

seek charitable aid, can scarcely be expected to meet. The cost of

salvarsan under present conditions is a burden that few can hope to

assume to the extent that modern treatment tends to require, and the

slower methods of treatment are more of a tax on the patient's courage

and determination, and less effective in preventing the danger of

infectiousness, although quite as reliable for cure. There is no more

serious problem in the public health movement against syphilis than to

get for the average man who can pay a moderate but not a large fee the

benefits of expensive and elaborate methods of recognizing and treating

a disease such as syphilis. Some practical methods of doing this will be

taken up in the next chapter.

+The Irresponsible.+--The irresponsible attitude of mind about syphilis

forms the background of the darkest and most repellent chapter in the

story of the disease. Yet we ought to confront it if we wish to master

the situation. The irresponsible person has either no regard for, or no

conception of, the rights of others where a dangerous contagious disease

is concerned, and often little conception of, and less interest in, what

is to his own ultimate advantage. Irresponsible syphilitics lack

character first and sense next. Many of them, through the gods-defying

combination of stupidity and ignorance, cannot be approached through any

channel of reason or persuasion. The only argument capable of

influencing such minds is compulsion. Others are, of course, mental

defectives with criminal and perverted tendencies. Yet it is both

amazing and discouraging to find how many irresponsibles there are in

the ordinary and even in the better walks of life. To the wilful type of

irresponsible person the transmission of a syphilitic infection is

nothing, and cannot weigh a straw against the gratification of his

desire or the pursuit of his own interest. The disease cannot teach such

people anything, and if it cannot, how can the physician? Such people

pursue their personal and sexual pleasure, marry, spread disaster around

them, and outlive it all, perhaps brazenly to acknowledge the fact.

Others, suave, attractive, agreeable, seductive, often masquerade as

respectability, or constitute the perfumed, the romantic, the elegant

carriers of disease. The proportion of ignorant to wilful

irresponsibility can scarcely be estimated. But there is little choice

between the two except on the score of the hopefulness of the latter. As

examples of the mixture of types with which a large hospital is

constantly dealing, I might offer the following at random, from my own

recollections: A milkman came to a clinic one morning with an eruption

all over his body and his mouth full of the most dangerously contagious

patches. Two of us cornered him and explained to him in full why he

should come in if only for twenty-four hours. He promised to be back

next morning and disappeared. Another, a butcher in the same condition,

put his wife, whom he had already infected, into the hospital, and in

spite of every argument by all the members of the staff, went home to

attend to his business--the selling of meat over the counter. A

lunch-room helper, literally oozing germs, was after several days

induced to come up for an examination and promised to begin treatment,

whereupon he disappeared. A college student reported with an early

primary sore. "X----," I said, "If you will pledge me your honor as a

gentleman never to take another chance and not to marry until I say you

are cured I will use salvarsan on you, which is just about as scarce as

gold now, and give you a chance for abortive cure." He pledged himself,

and six months later there was every sign that we were going to secure a

perfect result. Suddenly he failed to appear for a treatment

appointment, and I never saw him again. But I did see a letter written

to him by the clinic which showed that he had come up for the

examination with a newly acquired sore while he knew I was away--in all

probability a reinfection. He was not even man enough to face me with

his broken word. Three or four men with chancres may report in an

afternoon and leave, the clinic powerless to detain them or to protect

others against the damage they may do. One such, a Greek boy, had

exposed four different women to infection before we saw him, and only

the most strenuous efforts of the entire staff got him into the

hospital, because he had neither money nor sense. Half-witted tramps,

gang laborers, and foreigners who cannot understand a word of any other

language than Lithuanian or some other of the European dialects for

which no interpreter can be secured, pass in a steady stream through the

free clinics of large cities. The impossibility of securing even the

simplest coöperation from such patients is scarcely realized by any one

who is not called upon to deal with them face to face. Even with an

interpreter, they display the wilfulness of irresponsibility. One

Italian woman wiped her chancre, which was on her lip, with her fingers

at every other shake of the head. She was cooking for two boarders and

had two children. She did not like hospitals and was homesick and

pettish. Would she go over to the dispensary in the next block and find

out how to take care of herself? Not a bit of it. She was going home,

and she went. I saw the children later in the children's ward, both

infected with syphilis--a poor start in life. Criminal intent in the

transmission of syphilis is common enough, and the writer can think

off-hand of four or five cases in which men or women "got" their

estranged partners later in their careers.

+The Necessity for Legal Control.+--All these repulsive details have a

place in driving home a conception of the cost to society of the immoral

and irresponsible syphilitic. Syphilis is an infectious disease,

dangerous to the individual and to society. If it is rational to

quarantine a mouth and throat full of diphtheria germs, it is rational

to quarantine a mouth and throat full of syphilitic germs at least until

the germs are killed off for the time being. There can be no more excuse

for placing society at the mercy of the one than of the other.

+The Morbid Attitude of Mind: Syphilophobia.+--The morbid attitude of

mind, whether in persons who have the disease or in those who fear they

may have it, is one of the hardest the physician has to deal with. Any

one who knows anything of the disease naturally has a healthy desire to

avoid it, and if he is a victim of it, a considerable belief in its

seriousness. But certain types of persons, who are usually predisposed

to it by a nervous makeup, or who have a tendency to brood over things,

or who perhaps have heard some needlessly dreadful presentation of the

facts, become the victims of an actual mental disorder, a temporary

unbalancing of their point of view. To the victims of syphilophobia, as

this condition is called, syphilis fills the whole horizon. If they have

not been too seriously disturbed by the idea, a simple statement of the

facts does wonders toward relieving their minds. A few of them cling

with the greatest tenacity to the most absurd notions. For those victims

of the disease who are the prey of morbid anxiety the assurance that it

is one of the most curable of all the serious diseases, and that if they

are persistent and determined to get well, they can scarcely help doing

so, usually sets their minds at rest. The idea that there is a cloud of

disgrace over the whole subject, and the old-fashioned belief that

syphilis is incurable and hopeless, inflict needless torture and may do

serious damage to the highly organized sensitive spirits which it is to

society's best interest to conserve. The overconscientious syphilitic

hardly realizes that the real horrors of the disease are usually the

rewards of indifference rather than overanxiety. Persons who subject

themselves to the ordinary risks of infection which have been described

in the preceding chapters do well to be on their guard and to maintain

even a somewhat exaggerated caution. Those who do not expose themselves

need not look upon the disease with morbid anxiety or alarm. In the

relations of life in which syphilis is likely to be a factor it should,

of course, be ferreted out. But there is no occasion for panic. We need

a sane consciousness of the disease, a knowledge of its ways and of the

means of prevention and cure for the world at large. We do not need

hysteria, whether personal or general, and there is nothing in the facts

of the situation to warrant the development of such a mental attitude

either on the part of the syphilitic or of those by whom he is

surrounded. Insofar as morbid fear in otherwise normal persons is the

product of ignorance it can be dispelled by convincing them of this

fact.

The Third Great Plague A Discussion of Syphilis for Everyday People · 第 14 / 16 章