The following table exhibits the annual mortality in these classes.[5]

DEATHS IN 10,000.

Age Civilians Foot-Guards Home-Army

20 to 25 84 216 170

25 to 30 92 211 183

30 to 35 102 195 184

35 to 40 116 224 193

Through the fifteen years from 1839 to 1853 inclusive, the annual

mortality of all the army, excepting the artillery, engineers, and West

India and colonial corps, was 330 among 10,000 living; while that among

the same number of males of the army-ages, in all England and Wales, was

92, and in the healthiest districts only 77.[6]

There is no official account at hand of the general mortality in the

Russian army on the peace-establishment; yet, according to Boudin, in

one portion, consisting of 192,834 men, 144,352 had been sick, and

7,541, or 38 per 1,000, died in one year.[7]

The Prussian army, with an average of 150,582 men, lost by death, during

the ten years 1829 to 1838, 1,975 in each year, which is at the rate of

13 per 1,000 living.[8]

The mortality of the Piedmontese army, from 1834 to 1843 inclusive, was

158 in 10,000, while that of the males at home was 92 in the same number

living.

From 1775 to 1791, seventeen years, the mortality among the cavalry was

181, and among the infantry 349, out of 10,000 living; but in the ten

years from 1834 to 1843 these rates were only 108 and 215.[9]

Colored troops are employed by the British Government in all their

colonies and possessions in tropical climates. The mortality of these

soldiers is known, and also that of the colored male civilians in the

East Indies and in the West-India Islands and South-American Provinces.

In four of these, the rate of mortality is higher among the male slaves

than among the colored soldiers; but in all the others, this rate is

higher in the army. In all the West-Indian and South-American

possessions of Great Britain, the average rate of deaths is 25 per cent,

greater among the black troops than among the black males of all ages on

the plantations and in the towns. The soldiers are of the healthier

ages, 20 to 40, but the civilians include both the young and the old: if

these could be excluded, and the comparison made between soldiers and

laborers of the same ages, the difference in favor of civil pursuits

would appear much greater.

Throughout the world, where the armies of Great Britain are stationed or

serve, the death-rate is greater among the troops than among civilians

of the same races and ages, except among the colored troops in Tobago,

Montserrat, Antigua, and Granada in America, and among the Sepoys in the

East Indies.[10]

In the army of the United States, during the period from 1840 to 1854,

not including the two years of the Mexican War, there was an average of

9,278 men, or an aggregate of 120,622 years of service, equal to so many

men serving one year. Among these and during this period, there were

342,107 cases of sickness reported by the surgeons, and 3,416 deaths

from disease, showing a rate of mortality of 2.83 per cent., or two and

a half times as great as that among the males of Massachusetts of the

army-ages, and three times as great as that in England and Wales. The

attacks of sickness average almost three for each man in each year. This

is manifestly more than that which falls upon men of these ages at

home.[11]

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 10, No. 60, October, 1862 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 38 / 69 题