belonged to Sir Hugh Nevill, knight, and that the Lady Alice his
widow made a feoffment thereof, by the name of Leaden hall, with the
advowsons of the church of St. Peter upon Cornhill, and other churches,
to Richard, Earl of Arundell and Surrey, 1362. More, in the year 1380,
Alice Nevill, widow to Sir John Nevill, knight, of Essex, confirmed to
Thomas Gogshall and others the said manor of Leaden hall, the advowsons,
etc. In the year 1384, Humfrey de Bohun, Earl of Hereford, had the said
manor. And in the year 1408, Robert Rikeden, of Essex, and Margaret his
wife, confirmed to Richard Whittington, and other citizens of London,
the said manor of Leaden hall, with the appurtenances, the advowsons of
St. Peter’s church, St. Margaret’s Pattens, etc. And in the year 1411,
the said Whittington and other confirmed the same to the mayor and
commonalty of London, whereby it came to the possession of the city.
Then in the year 1443, the 21st of Henry VI., John Hatherley, mayor,
purchased license of the said king to take up two hundred fother of
lead, for the building of water conduits, a common granary, and the
cross in West Cheape, more richly, for the honour of the city. In the
year next following, the parson and parish of St. Dunston, in the east
of London, seeing the famous and mighty man (for the words be in the
grant, _cum nobilis et potens vir_), Simon Eyre, citizen of London,
among other his works of piety, effectually determined to erect and
build a certain granary upon the soil of the same city at Leaden hall,
of his own charges, for the common utility of the said city, to the
amplifying and enlarging of the said granary, granted to Henry Frowicke,
then mayor, the aldermen and commonalty, and their successors for
ever, all their tenements, with the appurtenances, sometime called the
Horsemill, in Grasse street, for the annual rent of four pounds, etc.
Also, certain evidences of an alley and tenements pertaining to the
Horsemill adjoining to the said Leaden hall in Grasse street, given
by William Kingstone, fishmonger, unto the parish church of St. Peter
upon Cornehill, do specify the said granary to be built by the said
honourable and famous merchant, Simon Eyre, sometime an upholsterer,
and then a draper, in the year 1419. He built it of squared stone, in
form as now it showeth, with a fair and large chapel in the east side of
the quadrant, over the porch of which he caused to be written, _Dextra
Domini exaltavit me_ (The Lord’s right hand exalted me). Within the said
church, on the north wall, was written. _Honorandus famosus mercator
Simon Eyre hujus operis_, etc. In English thus:--“The honourable and
famous merchant, Simon Eyre, founder of this work, once mayor of this
city, citizen and draper of the same, departed out of this life, the
18th day of September, the year from the Incarnation of Christ 1459,
and the 38th year of the reign of King Henry VI.” He was buried in
the parish church of St. Mary Woolnoth, in Lombard street: he gave by
his testament, which I have read, to be distributed to all prisons in
London, or within a mile of that city, somewhat to relieve them. More,
he gave two thousand marks, upon a condition, which not performed, was
then to be distributed to maids’ marriages, and other deeds of charity;
he also gave three thousand marks to the drapers, upon condition they
should, within one year after his decease, establish perpetually a
master or warden, five secular priests, six clerks, and two choristers,
to sing daily Divine service by note for ever, in his chapel of the
Leaden hall; also,[145] one master, with an usher, for grammar, one
master for writing, and the third for song, with housing there newly
built for them for ever; the master to have for his salary ten pounds,
and every other priest eight pounds, every other clerk five pounds six
shillings and eight pence, and every other chorister five marks; and
if the drapers refused this to do, within one year after his decease,
then the three thousand marks to remain to the prior and convent of
Christ’s church in London, with condition to establish, as is aforesaid,
within two years after his decease; and if they refused, then the three
thousand marks to be disposed by his executors, as they best could
devise, in works of charity. Thus much for his testament, not performed
by establishing of Divine service in his chapel, or free schools for
scholars; neither how the stock of three thousand marks, or rather five
thousand marks, was employed by his executors, could I ever learn. He
left issue, Thomas, who had issue, Thomas, etc. True it is, that in
one year, 1464, the 3rd of Edward IV., it was agreed by the mayor,
aldermen, and commonalty of London, that notwithstanding the king’s
letters patent, lately before granted unto them, touching the tronage or
weighing of wares to be holden at the Leaden hall, yet suit should be
made to the king for new letters patent to be granted to the mayor of
the staple for the tronage of wools to be holden there, and order to be
taken by the discretion of Thomas Cooke, then mayor, the counsel of the
city, Geffrey Filding, then mayor of the staple at Westminster, and of
the king’s council, what should be paid to the mayor and aldermen of the
city, for the laying and housing of the wools there, that so they might
be brought forth and weighed, etc.
Touching the chapel there, I find, that in the year 1466, by license
obtained of King Edward IV., in the 6th of his reign, a fraternity of
the Trinity, of sixty priests, besides other brethren and sisters, in
the same chapel, was founded by William Rouse, John Risbie, and Thomas
Ashby priests, some of the which sixty priests, every market-day in
the forenoon, did celebrate Divine service there to such market-people
as repaired to prayer; and once every year they met all together and
had solemn service, with procession of the brethren and sisters. This
foundation was in the year 1512, by a common council, confirmed to the
sixty Trinity priests, and to their successors, at the will of the mayor
and commonalty.
In the year 1484, a great fire happened upon this Leaden hall, by what
casualty I know not, but much housing was there destroyed, with all the
stocks for guns, and other provision belonging to the city, which was a
great loss, and no less charge to be repaired by them.
In the year 1503, the 18th of Henry VII., a request was made by the
commons of the city, concerning the usage of the said Leaden hall, in
form as followeth:--“Please it, the lord mayor, and common council, to
enact, that all Frenchmen bringing canvass, linen cloth, and other
wares to be sold, and all foreigners bringing wolsteds, sayes, staimus,
coverings, nails, iron work, or any other wares, and also all manner
of foreigners bringing lead to the city to be sold, shall bring all
such their wares aforesaid to the open market of the Leaden hall, there
and no where else to be sold and uttered, like as of old time it hath
been used, upon pain of forfeiture of all the said wares showed or
sold in any other place than aforesaid; the show of the said wares to
be made three days in the week, that is to say, Monday, Tuesday, and
Wednesday; it is also thought reasonable that the common beam be kept
from henceforth in the Leaden hall, and the farmer to pay therefore
reasonable rent to the chamber; for better it is that the chamber have
advantage thereby than a foreign person; and also the said Leaden hall,
which is more chargeable now by half than profitable, shall better bear
out the charges thereof; also the common beam for wool at Leaden hall,
may yearly pay a rent to the chamber of London, toward supportation
and charges of the same place; for reason it is, that a common office,
occupied upon a common ground, bear a charge to the use of the
commonalty; also, that foreigners bringing wools, felts, or any other
merchandises or wares to Leaden hall, to be kept there for the sale and
market, may pay more largely for the keeping of their goods than free
men.” Thus much for the request of the commons at this time.
Now to set down some proof that the said hall hath been employed and
used as a granary for corn and grain (as the same was first appointed),
leaving all former examples, this one may suffice: Roger Achley, mayor
of London in the year 1512, the 3rd of Henry VIII., when the said mayor
entered the mayoralty, there was not found one hundred quarters of wheat
in all the garners of the city, either within the liberties, or near
adjoining; through the which scarcity, when the carts of Stratford came
laden with bread to the city (as they had been accustomed) there was
such press about them, that one man was ready to destroy another, in
striving to be served for their money. But this scarcity did not last
long; for the mayor in short time made such provision of wheat, that the
bakers, both of London and Stratford, were weary of taking it up, and
were forced to take up much more than they would, and for the rest the
mayor laid out the money, and stored it up in Leaden hall, and other
garners of the city. This mayor also kept the market so well, that he
would be at the Leaden hall by four o’clock in the summer’s mornings;
and from thence he went to other markets, to the great comfort of the
citizens.
I read also that in the year 1528, the 20th of Henry VIII., surveyors
were appointed to view the garners of the city, namely, the Bridgehouse
and the Leaden hall, how they were stored of grain for the service of
the city. And because I have here before spoken of the bread carts
coming from Stratford at the Bow, ye shall understand that of old time
the bakers of bread at Stratford were allowed to bring daily (except the
Sabbath and principal feasts) divers long carts laden with bread, the
same being two ounces in the penny wheat loaf heavier than the penny
wheat loaf baked in the city, the same to be sold in Cheape, three or
four carts standing there, between Gutheron’s lane and Fauster’s lane
end, one cart on Cornhill, by the conduit, and one other in Grasse
street. And I have read, that in the 4th year of Edward II., Richard
Reffeham being mayor, a baker named John of Stratforde, for making bread
less than the assize, was with a fool’s hood on his head, and loaves
of bread about his neck, drawn on a hurdle through the streets of this
city. Moreover, in the 44th of Edward III., John Chichester being mayor
of London, I read in the _Visions of Pierce Plowman_, a book so called,
as followeth:
“At Londone, I leve,
Liketh wel my wafres;
And louren whan thei lakken hem.
It is noght longe y passed,
There was a careful commune,
Whan no cart com to towne
With breed fro Stratforde;
Tho gonnen beggaris wepe,
And werkmen were agast a lite;
This wole be thought longe.
In the date of oure Drighte,
In a drye Aprill,
A thousand and thre hundred
Twies twenty and ten,
My wafres there were gesene
Whan Chichestre was maire.”[146]
I read also in the 20th of Henry VIII., Sir James Spencer being mayor,
six bakers of Stratford were amerced in the Guildhall of London, for
baking under the size appointed. These bakers of Stratford left serving
of this city, I know not upon what occasion, about thirty years since.
In the year 1519 a petition was exhibited by the commons to the common
council, and was by them allowed, concerning the Leaden hall, how they
would have it used, viz. “Meekly beseeching, showeth unto your good
lordship and masterships, divers citizens of this city, which under
correction think, that the great place called the Leaden hall should,
nor ought not to be letten to farm to any person or persons, and in
especial to any fellowship or company incorporate, to have and hold the
same hall for term of years, for such inconveniences as thereby may
ensue, and come to the hurt of the common weal of the said city in time
to come, as somewhat more largely may appear in the articles following.
“First, If any assembly or hasty gathering of the commons of the said
city, for suppressing or subduing of misruled people within the said
city, hereafter shall happen to be called or commanded by the mayor,
aldermen, and other governors and councillors of the said city for the
time being, there is none so convenient, meet, and necessary a place,
to assemble them in, within the said city, as the said Leaden hall,
both for largeness of room, and their sure defence in time of their
counselling together about the premises. Also, in that place hath been
used the artillery, guns, and other armours of the said city, to be
safely kept in a readiness for the safeguard, wealth, and defence of
the said city, to be had and occupied at times when need required. As
also the store of timber for the necessary reparations of the tenements
belonging to the chamber of the said city, there commonly hath been
kept. Item, If any triumph or nobleness were to be done, or shown by
the commonalty of the city, for the honour of our sovereign lord the
king and realm, and for the worship of the said city, the said Leaden
hall is most meet and convenient place to prepare and order the said
triumph therein, and from thence to issue forth to the places therefore
appointed. Item, at any largess or dole of any money made unto the poor
people of this city, it hath been used to be done and given in the said
Leaden hall, for that the said place is most meet therefore. Item, the
honourable father, that was maker of the said hall, had a special will,
intent, and mind, that (as it is commonly said) the market men and
women that came to the city with victuals and other things, should have
their free standing within the said Leaden hall in wet weather, to keep
themselves and their wares dry, and thereby to encourage them, and all
other, to have the better will and desire the more plenteously to resort
to the said city, to victual the same. And if the said hall should be
letten to farm, the will of the said honourable father should never be
fulfilled nor take effect. Item, if the said place, which is the chief
fortress, and most necessary place within all the city, for the tuition
and safeguard of the same, should be letten to farm out of the hands
of the chief heads of the same city, and especially to another body
politic, it might at length by likelihood be occasion of discord and
debate between the said bodies politic, which God defend.
“For these and many other great and reasonable causes, which hereafter
shall be showed to this honourable court, your said beseechers think it
much necessary that the said hall be still in the hands of this city,
and to be surely kept by sad and discreet officers, in such wise, that
it may alway be ready to be used and occupied for the common weal of the
said city when need shall require, and in no wise to be letten to any
body politic.”
Thus much for the petition.
About the year 1534, great means were made about the Leaden hall to have
the same made a burse, for the assembly of merchants, as they had been
accustomed in Lombard street; many common councils were called to that
end: but in the year 1535, John Champneys being mayor, it was fully
concluded that the burse should remain in Lombard street as afore, and
Leaden hall no more to be spoken of concerning that matter.
The use of Leaden hall in my youth was thus:,--In a part of the north
quadrant, on the east side of the north gate, were the common beams for
weighing of wool and other wares, as had been accustomed; on the west
side the gate were the scales to weight meal; the other three sides were
reserved for the most part to the making and resting of the pageants
showed at Midsummer in the watch; the remnant of the sides and quadrant
was employed for the stowage of wool sacks, but not closed up; the lofts
above were partly used by the painters in working for the decking of
pageants and other devices, for beautifying of the watch and watchmen;
the residue of the lofts were letten out to merchants, the wool winders
and packers therein to wind and pack their wools. And thus much for
Leaden hall may suffice.
Now on the north of Lime street ward in the high street are divers fair
houses for merchants, and proper tenements for artificers, with an alley
also called Shaft alley, of the shaft or May-pole sometime resting over
the gate thereof, as I have declared in Aldgate ward. In the year 1576,
partly at the charges of the parish of St. Andrew, and partly at the
charges of the chamber of London, a water-pump was raised in Lime street
ward, near unto Lime street corner; for the placing of the which pump,
having broken up the ground, they were forced to dig more than two
fathom deep[147] before they came to any main ground, where they found a
hearth made of Britain, or rather Roman tile[148] every tile half a yard
square, and about two inches thick; they found coal lying there also
(for that lying whole will never consume); then digging one fathom into
the main, they found water sufficient, made their prall, and set up the
pump; which pump, with oft repairing and great charges to the parish,
continued not four-and-twenty years, but being rotted, was taken up and
a new set in place in the year 1600. Thus much for the high street.
In St. Marie street had ye of old time a parish church of St. Marie
the Virgin, St. Ursula, and the eleven thousand Virgins, which church
was commonly called St. Marie at the Axe, of the sign of an axe, over
against the east end thereof, or St. Marie Pellipar, of a plot of ground
lying on the north side thereof, pertaining to the Skinners in London.
This parish, about the year 1565, was united to the parish church of St.
Andrew Undershaft, and so was St. Mary at the Axe suppressed and letten
out to be a warehouse for a merchant. Against the east end of this
church was sometime a fair wall, now turned to a pump. Also against the
north end of this St. Mary street, was sometime one other parish church
of St. Augustine, called St. Augustine in the Wall, for that it stood
adjoining to the wall of the city, and otherwise called St. Augustin’s
Papey, or the poor, as I have read in the reign of Edward III. About
the year 1430, in the reign of Henry VI., the same church was allowed
to the brethren of the Papey, the house of poor priests, whereof I have
spoken in Aldgate ward. The parishioners of this church were appointed
to the parish church of Allhallows in the wall, which is in Broad street
ward, this brotherhood called Papey, being suppressed, the church of St
Augustin was pulled down, and in place thereof one Grey an apothecary
built a stable, hay-loft, etc. It is now a dwelling-house.[149] Those
two parish churches, both lying in the ward of Lime street, being thus
suppressed, there is not any one parish church or place for Divine
service in that ward, but the inhabitants thereof repair to St. Peter
in Cornhill ward, St. Andrew in Aldgate ward, Alhallows in the wall in
Broad street ward, and some to St. Denis in Langborne ward.
Now because of late there hath been some question, to what ward this
church of St. Augustine Papey should of right belong, for the same hath
been challenged by them of Aldgate ward, and without reason taken into
Bishopsgate ward from Lime street ward, I am somewhat to touch it. About
thirty years since the chamber of London granted a lease of ground, in
these words: “lying near London wall in the ward of Lime street, from
the west of the said church or chapel of St. Augustine Papey towards
Bishopsgate,” etc. On the which plot of ground the lease built three
fair tenements, and placed tenants there; these were charged to bear
scot and lot, and some of them to bear office in Lime street ward; all
which they did willingly without grudging. And when any suspected or
disordered persons were by the landlord placed there, the officers of
Lime street ward fetched them out of their houses, committed them to
ward, procured their due punishments, and banished them from thence;
whereby in short time that place was reformed, and brought into good
order; which thing being noted by them of Aldgate ward, they moved their
alderman, Sir Thomas Offley, to call in those houses to be of his ward;
but I myself showing a fair ledger book, sometimes pertaining to the
late dissolved priory of the Holy Trinity whithin Aldgate, wherein were
set down the just bounds of Aldgate ward, before Sir Thomas Offley, Sir
Rowland Heyward, the common council, and wardmote inquest of the same
Lime street ward, Sir Thomas Offley gave over his challenge, and so
that matter rested in good quiet until the year 1579, that Sir Richard
Pype being mayor, and alderman of Bishopsgate ward, challenged those
houses to be of his ward, whereunto (without reason showed) Sir Rowland
Heyward yielded. And thus is that side of the street, from the north
corner of St. Mary street almost to Bishopsgate, wherein is one plot
of ground, letten by the chamberlain of London to the parish of St.
Martin’s Oteswich, to be a churchyard or burying place for the dead of
that parish, etc., unjustly drawn and withholden from the ward of Lime
street. Divers other proofs I could set down, but this one following
may suffice.--The mayor and aldermen of London made a grant to the
fraternity of Papie in these words: “Be it remembered, that where now
of late the master and wardens of the fraternity of the Papie have made
a brick wall, closing in the chapel of St. Augustine called Papie
chapel, situate in the parish of All Saints in the Wall, in the ward of
Lime street, of the city of London; from the south-east corner of the
which brick wall is a scutcheon of twenty-one feet of assize from the
said corner eastward. And from the same scutcheon there to a messuage
of fifty-five feet and a half westward, the said scutcheon breaketh
out of line right southward betwixt the measures aforesaid three feet
and five inches of assize, upon the common ground of the said city
aforesaid, Ralph Verney, mayor, and the aldermen of the same city, the
22nd day of October, the 6th year of Edward IV., granted to John Hod,
priest, and to Master John Bolte, and Thomas Pachet, priests, wardens
of the fraternity of Papie aforesaid, and to their successors for ever,
etc., yielding four pence sterling yearly at Michaelmas.” And this is,
saith my book,[150] enrolled in the Guild hall of London; which is a
sufficient proof the same plot of ground to be of Lime street ward, and
never otherwise accounted or challenged.
On the south side of this street, stretching west from St. Mary street
towards Bishopsgate street, there was of old time one large messuage
built of stone and timber, in the parish of St. Augustine in the Wall,
now the parish of Allhallows in the same wall, belonging to the Earl of
Oxford, for Richard de Vere, Earl of Oxford, possessed it in the 4th of
Henry V.; but in process of time the lands of the earl fell to females,
amongst the which, one being married to Wingfielde of Suffolke, this
house with the appurtenances fell to his lot, and was by his heir, Sir
Robert Wingfield, sold to Master Edward Coke, at this time the queen’s
attorney-general. This house being greatly ruinated of late time, for
the most part hath been letten out to poulterers, for stabling of horses
and stowage of poultry, but now lately new built into a number of small
tenements, letten out to strangers, and other mean people.
One note more of this ward, and so an end. I find of record, that in
the year 1371, the 45th of Edward III., a great subsidy of one hundred
thousand pounds was granted towards the king’s wars in France, whereof
the clergy paid fifty thousand pounds, and the laity fifty thousand
pounds, to be levied to thirty-nine shires of England, containing
parishes eight thousand six hundred, of every parish five pounds sixteen
shillings, the greater to help the lesser. This city, as one of the
shires, then containing twenty-four wards, and in them one hundred and
ten parishes, was therefore assessed to six hundred and thirty-five
pounds twelve shillings, whereof Lime street ward did bear thirty-four
shillings and no more, so small a ward it was, and so accounted, as
having no one whole parish therein, but small portions only of two
parishes in that ward. This ward hath an alderman, his deputy, common
councillors four, constables four, scavengers two, wardmote inquest
sixteen, and a beadle; and is taxed to the fifteenth at one pound
nineteen shillings and two pence three farthings.
FOOTNOTES:
[144] “It is taxed to the fifteene in London at 46 _li._, and accounted
in the Exchequer to £45 10_s._”--_1st edition_, p. 113.
[145] “Three schoolemaisters, with an usher, to wit.”--_1st edition_, p.
118.