Labels help the fool to do what little dull thinking he manages to get

through. He knows whom to respect and whom to despise and what wine to

choose, and so on—all by the label. And then again, labels are very

useful to the fool by getting him taken for more than he is worth. Any

number of my friends have said to me at one time or another, when I was

having my laugh at the politicians: ‘A man does not get to a position

like that (Secretary of State for Drainage, or Prime Minister, or what

not) without abilities.’ Now this error shows how useful the label is

to the fool. For a matter of fact I can testify, if any living man

can, that the politicians who get their share of the swag are of all

degrees in the matter of intelligence. Some have first-rate abilities,

especially among the lawyers; many are of the ordinary second-rate,

fifty-eight per cent, β _minus_ or Wandsworth intelligence; and quite

a large proportion are Plumb Stuffed Fools, true Fools Absolute and of

the Nadir; Rooted Fools. I knew one Fool Secretary of State who, in his

Whitehall office, used to look at his official documents with a sort

of tragic stare, as men look on the dead, and slowly wag them up and

down in front of his face with a hopeless gesture. Then he would call

upon his permanent official, who would explain to him what they meant,

whereupon he would use one after another of the great Fool Phrases

which are the furniture of the Fool’s Mind, such as, ‘Yes,’ ‘I see,’

‘Quite,’ ‘Precisely,’ and then again ‘Yes.’ Having done this, he would

sign his name to a number of papers which meant no more to him than

so many Chinese tracts, and with a groan he would go off to spend his

hundred pounds a week at Brighton.

Even in those trades where you would think there must be activity of

brain for a man to advance at all, your fool drifts forward somehow.

You find him quite high up in armies, and as for his number in the

great cheating professions, notably share-shuffling, it is prodigious.

Half the wealthy share-shufflers I have known have been fools animal,

fools crass, fools to be driven blindfold or led about on a halter;

but to do that great modern profession justice, there is a minority

of share-shufflers as keen as needles and as wide-awake as ferrets.

They have no more luck, however, than their duller brethren, for Fate

rules them all, and alternate wealth and poverty is as much the rule

with them as with the stupidest men. I will bargain that if you were to

take samples of share-shufflers out of three sacks, the House of Lords,

Monte Carlo, and the gaols, you would find the same percentage of fools

in each sample.

Which leads me on to say that never was an old proverb of less accurate

modern application than the proverb about the fool and his money. You

will have heard it said that the fool and his money are soon parted.

That was true enough for the yokel at the fair, but in this modern city

life of ours it is just the other way. The Fool of Inherited Money

(not the Gambling Fool) holds on to it with fish-hooks. It is the

intelligent man, with many interests and (by some freak of nature) a

generous heart, who squanders his hoard. But your fool gets his legs

round the money-bag and crosses his ankles on the other side, clasps it

higher up with both arms right round it and fingers tightly interlocked

beyond; digs his teeth into the mouth of the same and, screwing up his

eyes, clutches it all over desperately with the rigour of death, making

himself wholly one with the beloved object. From this attitude nothing

can move him save the lure of a plausible fellow promising to increase

his wealth. I have seen a clot of fools thus hanging on to money-bags,

all pressed up together like bats in a steeple, when a repulsive,

overdressed young adventurer would slither by singing a light song of

great wealth to be made in some scheme of his devising; and, behold,

the fools would turn their round heads ungummed from their money-bags

and listen in rapture to that song, and many of them would even hand

over their bags to the young adventurer, never to see their gold again.

But I say that, save when they are thus tempted by their blind avarice,

fools are not easily parted from their money.

However, this harbour or pilot fool of mine was not, I think, troubled

in this regard, for had he been a Fool of Wealth he would not have been

blundering to get the Nona up-channel in the dark.

Five separate times did we touch and wait with increasing anger each

time till the flood released us, but at last we came to the pool, and

to reasonable deep water, and to a quay.

There did we put out our warping ropes, and springs, and the fenders

alongside, and there did we give money to the fool as a reward for all

the pain his folly had given us.

For also this is the rule in human life; that when you suffer anything

you must pay a good price for the entertainment.

It is true of bad cooking, and of bad wine, and of a painful illness,

started or continued by doctors, and of all the intolerable noisy

hotels, full of insolence and maddening bells. It is true of all the

bad things of the world. Nor does it follow that all cheap things are

good. Far from it! But all good things are cheap (except caviare), and

the way to get good things is to look for them as you would look for a

penny which you had dropped in the straw of the (once again!) dear old

omnibuses of my youth which were pulled by horses, and had standing at

their door a guardian of the poorest of the people, foul in speech,

grimy of skin, unshaven, bloodshot, from the gutter—but (oh, believe

me!) a better citizen of a better time than ours.

Nona, cruising and voyaging Nona, wanderer over the seas of Britain,

how in the solitude of your companionship my mind does lead me from one

thing to another!

But that’s all one. It is time for sleep.

The new day having come, we got the half-ebb a little before six

o’clock, and threaded away down the Channel for the open sea.

I ought, I suppose, to have stopped in Port Madoc, and renewed the

memories of my childhood. But a fig for the memories of my childhood,

at six o’clock in the morning: at six o’clock of a May morning, and

a nice little leading breeze, all cold and merry! The memories of

childhood and the contemplation of the divine are for the evening;

they go with candle-light, and with a wine I know, and with friends

of twenty years. But, so help me He that made me, when I find the

morning wind blowing well for the salt and myself freshly roused from

a good sleep, I am full of nothing but the coming of the course and an

eagerness for the line of the sea against the sky and the making of a

further shore.

It ought to be more dangerous to float down on the ebb without a local

trickster, than to come up upon the flood. But fortune served, and

the swirl of the ebb plainly marked the channel under that heartening

light, with the glory of the new day shooting over the tops of the

great and solemn mountains eastward, by the land.

Therefore, without misadventure, we came to the last marking buoy and

took the sea; running easily with the wind nearly aft, but a little on

the port quarter, so that all was well.

The great field or marsh before Harlech stretched there to landward;

and, on its splendid defiant height, the old castle watched us as we

went; the place where they hid poor Henry the Saint when the true

Plantagenet was pacing for his blood.

Here is a landscape inhabited everywhere by things not of this world;

by the gods of these hills whom our God has ousted; by the memory of

great men dead and their wraiths, I suppose; and by the troops of the

Empire, marching up the inland road, and by the chieftains, and by the

very saintly men who cast their spell fifteen hundred years ago over

the islands and the rocks of Lyonesse.

So we sailed on and on, heading over to the Atlantic southern corner of

Wales. Then, far away in the midst of the sea, we heard the tolling of

a bell....

The tolling of the bell was not only mournful (and at the same time

terrible), but had in it an odd quality of message; as though it were

not of the world through which we moved. For a bell is a land thing,

and even in salt water we think of it as sounding upon a buoy near

shore, or as the companion and regulator of human things, like the bell

on board ship. For Mr. Masefield is very just when he notes how the

clang of the ship’s bell by accident in the swoop of a ship down the

great waves of an Atlantic storm, has an unnatural call: being rung

without the aid of men’s hands.

Now this bell, as I heard it plainting away deeply, unable as yet to

see the thing on which it swung, mixed up its noise in my mind with

the great story of Saint Patrick: a story I had designed to write

many years ago in Arras, where I went to see the manuscript which

most vividly recalls him. But of that task I found myself incapable.

However, I did visit his staff in Rome.

For the bell thus swinging on its buoy far out to sea swings on the

western edge of that strange, long undersea road which they call the

‘Sarn Badrig’ (which means ‘The Causeway of Saint Patrick’) and cannot

but awake the great story of the coming of Europe to Ireland.

How right they were to call that sunken ridge pointing straight to

Ireland ‘The Roman Road of Patrick’! And how its sudden cessation

symbolises the break, the wound, the rupture, by which this island was

cut off from that: more than two hundred years ago! The ridge ends

suddenly in deep water and continues no more. But the bell tolls on,

appealing.

Saint Patrick is the second of those witnesses which remain to us of

the more than natural quality of Ireland. The first is the old pagan

story of the western harbours from which the dead were ferried over

by night to their felicity. The second is that undying phrase in the

‘Confessio,’ where Saint Patrick himself says that at night and in

dreams ‘he heard the voices of the Irish calling.’

It is gloom upon the mind to remember that the magnitude of the task

set to Britain (a Roman land) in the matter of Holy Ireland, has been

so missed: as though a man, having to encounter a mountain a little

before the day thought it no more than a slight hill against the dawn.

Here was the difficult land—but inspired—which Agricola said (and he

knew his business) he could have mastered for Rome and right order with

one legion. That legion was not given him, any more than the divisions

were given that might have made the break through before Cambrai. Would

that the officials at Rome had listened to him! Here was Ireland that

most difficult of subjects, most intriguing of friends, most tenacious

of enemies, set up against the western shores of Britain, of Roman

land; and through all those centuries nothing was done to enrich the

subject, to acquire the friend, to reconcile the enemy. But I am weak

enough to believe that this failure also was in the Providence of God.

The mountains look upon the mountains: the mountains of Britain to the

mountains of Ireland; from the east to the west, over a magic sea.

But they look in wrath and remain sullen giants. Nor is the battle

concluded.

As we sail past the bell very slowly (that Mark having come into sight)

we discovered it to be enclosed in a sort of great cage which swung

with slow dignity and bowed backwards and forwards upon the large

swell, unaffected by the light breeze which gave us our two knots

through sluggish water. My companion said to me, brutally enough, ‘How

would you like to be shut up in that cage, and left there to the night

and to the wind?’ I answered, ‘Not at all,’ and in this I told the

truth. But the bell did not repine, for it was fulfilling its function,

expiating its sins, pursuing its end, and consonant to the will that is

behind this world. It tolls there beyond the seaward end of the Sarn

Badrig to warn mariners of that long ledge submerged: barring the sea

ways.

My mind returned to that great Causeway, that shelf of rock and shingle

behind us, just hidden by the waves, pointing westward into the deep,

mile after mile, like some drowned giant’s pier: the beginning of a

bridge, as it were, between Britain and the Other Island; the marriage

of Britain with the older island, whence the dead are ferried over to

their repose.

But that Causeway was never completed: that bridge was never built; and

the weight, the future consequence, of such a failure lies not upon

Ireland, but (alas!) upon England.

For how many years did I not see the tragedy played out!

I knew its roots as well as any man. I knew that the gulf was a gulf

of religion. I knew that the riddle was without solution for men whose

eyes were cast downwards; who did not admit the unseen powers; who

could see nothing but the mud and wealth in which they stood—yet I

marvelled that the dreadful affair should drag on so long.

To the one set, to those sham ‘Liberals’ and ‘Unionists’ of the

wretched money game at Westminster, it was a lucrative jest. They cared

not for Ireland at all, and not too much for England. They treated the

martyrdom of Ireland as a counter in their play. To do them justice,

they thought that England could never suffer. To the others, to those

of Ireland, the struggle was (as they thought) a battle always lost.

In the beginning of their effort, the men who had organised a political

caucus for Ireland and had attempted, by what they called the

‘Nationalist’ Party, to get some settlement by way of the Parliamentary

morass, were sincere; yes, at first, flamingly sincere. Parnell I never

met; but Davitt I knew—and a man more heroically sincere I have never

had the fortune to meet and respect. To the very end the effort of the

Irishmen at Westminster retained some dwindling element of truth. And

this I say though I know that many Irishmen to-day may laugh at me for

saying it. But it is true. Down to the very end, sunk as they had grown

in the sodden Westminster habit, and conventional as had become the

repetition of their demand, some conception of a goal to be reached at

last still inhabited these men. I knew them and I can testify to it.

Right up to 1914—it sounds laughable, but it is true—the group at

Westminster which called itself ‘The Irish Party’ did, in some fading

way, still hold the idea of a ‘Parliamentary settlement.’ It was true

of John Redmond and his brother. I may fairly say that his brother died

for that idea.

They really did think (to me it was astonishing; to the younger Irish,

to many of them at least, incredible) that a solution was to be reached

through the working of those then undermined, moth-eaten, now crumbled

falsehoods of the professional politicians: that the farce of voting is

‘the voice of the people’; that the House of Commons is ‘a mirror of

England’; that ‘the nation rules through its representatives’—and all

the rest of the absurdities bred by the grafting of French democratic

attempts on to the decline of English aristocracy.

It sounds not possible that _any_ Irishman, even after a lifetime

at Westminster, could be so deceived. But, I say it again, I knew

these men. I can testify to the truth of what I have said. They did

right up to 1914 still faintly hope. I knew them as friends and as

opponents. They were my opponents when I took my share in defending the

Catholic schools in 1906, and they were angry at my going to see the

Pope in that year, to lay before him what I thought to be sufficient

amendments to Mr. Birrell’s Bill (for they regarded the Catholic

schools in England as their private domain). What is enormous, these

men, Redmond and his party, thought that their Westminster method could

still achieve something after the manifest betrayal of Ireland by the

politicians labelled ‘Liberal’ upon the outbreak of the Great War.

It is a process I have watched over and over again in the course of my

short but too long life; men not seeing what (one would imagine) should

be apparent to a child.

These men did not see that you cannot get strength out of rottenness;

nor justice, nor truth, nor generosity out of moribund institutions

(such as is now the House of Commons), which, after a certain stage in

decline, no longer live save for personal intrigue.

I say nothing, therefore, against them, in spite of their failure, and

I revere their memory. The Irish in good time will give to the last

protagonists in that futile attempt a due position in their annals; and

specially to William Redmond and his brother, John Redmond.

For writing this I may be assailed from either side; but it is true.

Anyhow, I saw the tragedy going on before my eyes, as a man on a shore

height may see a boat making straight for rocks under water, apparent

to him, but of which her steersman knows nothing. I saw it in the years

when I watched it as a young man from the gallery of the House of

Commons; I saw it during the two Parliaments in which I sat; I saw it

when I had left the place in disgust. I saw it in the last four years

before the Great War; England, still drifting hopelessly on to the

Irish reef: till she struck.

I saw, year after year, from my boyhood to my middle manhood and later,

the Parliamentary poison eating up the Irish effort and the English

face turned away from Ireland, failing to understand its own doom. For

England, a seat of vision, might have understood the opportunity and

the peril had the Irish themselves used pen and word directly. But the

wrong instrument was used: the broken and now useless instrument of the

Commons.

I saw the politicians whom the Irish sent over, or rather, who had the

machinery of the Irish protest in their hands, grow fonder and fonder

of the Westminster drug and degradation. I saw them half in doubt, at

last, whether it were not better to remain in London half enjoying

what had become second nature to them, the wretched pomposities of the

House of Commons. They should rather have nourished the flame of their

country. Yet they were honest men, and at heart and at root were Irish

to the end. But they thought that England was to be made to understand

by the use of a machine, the Parliamentary machine, which was already

worn out. It was their fundamental error. What man desiring to move men

would waste his time in Parliament?

If a man may boast of a small personal experience, I myself told

them what would come. But they would not believe me. They thought me

fanatical in this—and to the end. They put their trust in the slime of

the lobbies. It swallowed them up.

I saw the end; or rather the beginning of the end—for the true end

of the Irish quarrel is still hidden, and will be perhaps for us,

here in England, very terrible. I saw the professional politicians

carrying their silly labels of ‘Liberal’ and ‘Unionist,’ footling, on

the very edge of the war precipice in 1914, at a game for avoiding the

Irish issue, and (as they dined together) arranging tricks to put it

off on one side. I saw their vast relief when they were given their

chance to the threat of a mutiny against the salvation of England and

Ireland. And I saw—I lived to see—the contemptible capitulation: the

Parliamentary puppets (Lord Chancellors and the rest) shouting on a

Wednesday that ‘they would not rest until they had taken the last arm

from the hands of the last rebel,’ and on the following Friday, at the

bidding of their financial masters, surrendering to Ireland for ever:

Ireland that might have been the bulwark of England.... It is done.

So we sailed slowly on, past the end of Saint Patrick’s Causeway, past

that mournful great tolling bell which hangs there in the middle sea;

imprisoned in its cage, expiating the too careless sins of its youth.

The lamentable sound of it, the unsatisfied appeal, followed us over

the deep. So we sailed on, with our nose for the Atlantic headlands of

the south, and for the corners of Wales, where they face the Cornish

and the Devon seas and Ireland also, beyond, with the great ocean

rolling in between.

High as are the mountains on this shore, yet by a trick of the air they

were soon out of sight.

That is a thing I have never understood. High land which ought to be

plainly visible, and even overhanging one, disappears like this at

sea magically on a clear day. When the weather is thick, one expects

that; but the curious thing is that one may see clear air all around

and a sharp horizon, nothing but sky and sea, and yet know perfectly

well that the empty heaven at which one is gazing is really full

of great hills close at hand. I do not know whether this happens

in the clearer parts of the world. I have never seen it off North

Africa or California. But upon the coasts of these islands it happens

continually, and it is one of the hundred things which, I think, has

made their inhabitants familiar with mystery and amenable to the

unseen. For those of these islands, British and Irish, have always

been remarkable for the sense of mystery; and among them none feel the

effect of mystery more strongly than such as sail upon the sea.

It was an astonishing thing to sit there, at the end of the afternoon,

just past the end of Saint Patrick’s Causeway, heading for Strumbles

light below the horizon, with a slight air, now from the northwest,

giving the boat steering-way and no more, with the tiller lazily pushed

a little up to keep her course, and looking over the rail to the left,

eastward, and seeing nothing there but an horizon of empty sky; yet

knowing very well that the sky was not empty, but that the enormous

mass of Cader Idris and the enormous mass of Plinlimmon stood guarding

the sea. It was like the continual experience of this life wherein

the wise firmly admit vast Presences to stand in what is an apparent

emptiness, unperceived by any sense.

As I thus looked over the rail musing upon the strangeness of such

things, I remembered how, many years ago, in this same boat and holding

this same tiller, I had wondered, after a too rapid passage across the

Channel from France, under too much canvas and with too much wind, how

near I might be to England. For one could not see the coast at all.

The wind had dropped suddenly, it had grown dead calm, and the Nona

lolloped on the big lump which the breeze had left. I had no idea,

within ten miles, where I might be; it is a ridiculous confession to

make, but true. It was the height of the spring tides, and I only

roughly knew the set of them in mid-Channel. While I was so wondering,

I thought I saw some difference between the lower and the upper sky, as

though the lower grey were faintly darker than the upper. In a moment

the line was defined, and I found myself looking at the turn of the

high land east of Folkestone, where it runs away inland towards the old

Roman harbour of Lympne. I was not more than three miles from shore.

And as there is a concealment of reality at sea, corresponding to the

concealment of reality from our experience in human life, so also at

sea there is occasionally vision, corresponding to that occasional

vision which you also have in human life: but vision is much rarer than

the concealment of reality.

Once out near the Looe with an ugly thunderstorm glowering and

lumbering down from the north, full of zigzags of lightning, I, in this

same boat, was shortening sail rapidly to meet the gust when it should

come. Even as I did so, I saw a fierce red light beating upon the Seven

Sisters and Beachy Head, more than forty miles away. You could see

every detail of those chalk cliffs. You could have touched them with

your hand; yet the sea in between was vague: and that was a vision of

the unseen. I say that the sea is in all things the teacher of men.

With the afternoon the wind freshened, and, as it freshened, went right

round by north to a little east of north, whence it blew steadily

enough, and gave us about four knots at the fall of darkness.

The cruise of the Nona · 第 3 / 25 段